Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law
Reference:

Studenetskaya V.A. Evolution of Some Legal Instruments of National Innovation Systems of the United States of America and France

Abstract: This article describes the concept of national innovation systems (further — NIS), as a complex of interrelated elements that provide innovative development within national borders. There is no single model for the development of an innovative economy and the presence of positive characteristics and proven approaches in each country. The main law instrument to regulate the functioning of the NIS is the legislation. There is no single approach to the legislative model in this area in world practice. The author focuses on the legal institutions and mechanisms that have influenced the development of national innovation economies of the U.S. and France. In the U.S., analyzes the successful experience of the development of the legal institution of patent law and concludes the advancing the development of intellectual property legislation in Europe. In France, is prevailing high level of tax burden on business structure and discusses the improvement of legal acts that describes the tax benefits and legal status of individual actors of the NIS.


Keywords:

national innovation system, U.S. patent law, innovation tax credit.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Edquist C., ed., Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, London: Pinter, 1997.
2. Freeman S. The Economics of Hope. Essays in Technical change, Economic Growth and the Environment. Pinter Pub., London and New York. 1992, p. 227.
3. Freeman, C., Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan, London: Frances Pinter, 1987.
4. Porter M.E. Competitive advantage of nations. Macmillan. London.1990.
5. Rajneesh Narula, Understanding absorptive capacities in an “Innovation Systems” context: consequences for economic and employment growth. Research Memorundum series. 2004. C. 14 (www.merit.unu.edu)
6. Report of the Invest in France Agency on French R&D incentives dated April 2009. P. 124.
7. The annex to the French Financial Acts for 2009 and 2010 called “voies et moyens” dated respectively October 2008 and October 2009.
8. The Council’s report on the compulsory contributions (« Conseil des prélèvements libératoires ») dated October 2009.
9. Doklad senatskogo komiteta po torgovle, nauke i transportu, 21 aprelya 1986 g.
10. Doklad o progresse v realizatsii finansovykh instrumentov v sootvetstvii s dolgosrochnoi programmoi dlya malykh i srednikh predpriyatii, EUR-Lex, European Union law http://eur-lex.europa.eu/ LexUriServ/LexUriServ. do?uri=COM:2007:0235:FIN:ES:PD