Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Karpenko, A.S. Principle of Plentitude in Philosophy. Part I

Abstract: The author of the article analyzes logical consequence of the principle of abundance described by Arthur Lovejoy in his book ‘The Great Chain of Being’ (1936). Arthur Lovejoy asserts that all potentials of existence must be fulfilled. The principle of abundance is completed with the principle of plentitude that requires practical implementation of all what is thought to be possible. Fulfillment of the principle of plentitude causes numerous ‘stratifications’ of space, time, world and all. This is the conclusion modern cosmology has come to as well. To save ourselves from absolute chaos, we need to limit the principle of plentitude. Therefore, we approach the most fundamental problem in ontology: how does the impossible become possible? The series includes the following articles: 1. Introduction. 2. The Great Chain of Being. 3. The principle of abundance. 4. The unified. 5. Theodicy. 6. Ontological evidence of God’s existence. 7. The problem of eternity. 8. The limits. 9. The impossible. 10. Theories of incompleteness. 11. Borders of mind? 12. Destiny of human. 13. Everett worlds. 14. The principle of plentitude in action. 15. On the way to intelligent Multiverse. Annex. Alternative Reality: Gaius Iulius Caesar.

Keywords:

Everett worlds, borders of mind, undecidability, Godel about incompleteness, impossibility, eternity, theodicy, principle of abundance, Multiverse, symmetric distortion.

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Panayides C. Aristotle and the principle of plenitude. The case of De Caelo a. 12 // Filozofia. 2010. Vol. 65. ¹ 1. P. 49-62.
2. Oppy G. Ontological arguments // Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2011. URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ontological-arguments/.
3. Nahin, P.J. Time Machines: Time Travel in Physics, Metaphysics, and Science Fiction. New York: Springer, 2001.
4. Mahoney E.P. Lovejoy and the hierarchy of being // Journal of the History of Ideas. 1987. Vol. 48. ¹ 2. P. 221-230.
5. Lewis D. The paradoxes of time travel // American Philosophical Quarterly. 1976. Vol. 13. P. 145-52.
6. Lange M. Could the laws of nature change? // Philosophy of Science. 2008. Vol. 75. P. 69-92.
7. Kuntz P.G. A Formal Preface and an Informal Conclusion to "The Great Chain of Being": The Necessity and Universality of Hierarchical Thought // The Modern Schoolman. 1983. Vol. 60. ¹ 4. P. 273-282.
8. Kukkonen T. Plenitude, possibility, and the limits of reason: A medieval Arabic debate on the metaphysics of nature // Journal of the History of Ideas. 2000. Vol. 61. ¹ 4. P. 539-560.
9. Knuuttila S. Medieval theories of modality // Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2013. URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/modality-medieval/.
10. Kane R.H. Nature, plenitude and sufficient reason // American Philosophical Quarterly. 1976. Vol. 13. P. 23-31.
11. Jacob's Ladder and the Tree of Life: Concepts of Hierarchy and the Great Chain of Being. 2nd rev. ed. / Eds. M.L. Kuntz and P.G. Kuntz. New York: Peter Lang, 1988.
12. Hintikka J. Gaps in the great chain of being: Exercise in the methodology of history of ideas // Reforging the Great Chain of Being: Studies of the History of Modal Theories / Ed. S. Knuuttila. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1981. P. 1-17.
13. Hintikka J. Aristotle on the realization of possibilities in time // Hintikka J. Time and Necessity: Studies in Aristotle’s Theory of Modality. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973. V Chapter.
14. Gram M.S. and Martin R.M. The perils of plenitude: Hintikka contra Lovejoy // Journal of the History of Ideas. 1980. Vol. 41. ¹ 3. P. 497–511.
15. Fritzsch H. The Fundamental Constants. A Mystery of Physics. World Scientific, 2009.
16. Formigari L. Chain of Being // Dictionary of the History of Ideas: Studies of Selected Pivotal Ideas. Vol. I. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1968. P. 325-335.
17. Earman J. and Wüthrich C. Time machines // Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2010. URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/time machine/.
18. Dummett M. Bringing about the past // The Philosophical Review. 1964. Vol. 73. P. 338-359.
19. Dick S.J. Life on Other Worlds: The 20th-Century Extraterrestrial Life Debate. Cambridge University Press, 1998.
20. Dick S.J. Plurality of Worlds. The Origins of the Extraterrestrial Life Debate from Democritus to Kant. Cambridge University Press, 1982.
21. Crowe M.J. The Extraterrestrial Life Debate, 1750-1900. 2nd ed. Dover Publications, 2011.
22. Bynum W.F. The great chain of being after forty years: An appraisal // History of Science. 1975. Vol. 13. P. 81-28.
23. Barrow J. The Infinite Book: A Short Guide to the Boundless, Timeless and Endless. Random House, 2010.
24. Barrow J. Impossibility: The Limits of Science and the Science of Limits. Oxford University Press, 1999.
25. Einshtein A. Sobranie nauchnykh trudov. T. 4. M.: Nauka, 1967.
26. Yung K.G. Sinkhronistichnost': akauzal'nyi svyazuyushchii printsip // Yung K.G. Sinkhronistichnost'. Sbornik. M.: Refl-buk; Kiev: Vakler, 1997.
27. Khoking S. i dr. Budushchee prostranstva i vremeni. SPb: Amfora i dr., 2009.
28. Khludneva S.V. Artur Lavdzhoi i «Velikaya tsep' bytiya» // Istoriya filosofii. 2003. ¹ 10. S. 244-250.
29. Frenkel' A. i Bar-Khillel I. Osnovaniya teorii mnozhestv. M.: Mir, 1966.
30. Frank S.L. Ontologicheskoe dokazatel'stvo bytiya Boga // Frank S.L. Po tu storonu pravogo i levogo. Paris: YMCA-Press, 1972. S. 107-152.
31. Torn K. Chernye dyry i skladki vremeni. Derzkoe nasledie Einshteina. M.: Fizmatlit, 2008.
32. Uaitkhed A. Nauka i sovremennyi mir // Uaitkhed A. Izbrannye raboty po filosofii. M.: Progress, 1990.
33. Plotin. O blage ili edinom // Logos. 1992. ¹ 3. S. 213-228.
34. Tomilin K.A. Fundamental'nye fizicheskie postoyannye: v istoricheskom i metodologicheskom aspektakh. M.: Fizmatlit, 2006.
35. Platon. Soch. v 3-kh t. T. 3. Chast' 1. M.: Mysl', 1971.
36. Naan G.I. Tipy beskonechnogo // Einshteinovskii sbornik. 1967. M.: Nauka, 1967. S. 287-307.
37. Penrouz R. Put' k real'nosti, ili zakony, upravlyayushchie Vselennoi. Polnyi putevoditel'. M.–Izhevsk: IKI i dr., 2007.
38. Lukasevich Ya. O determinizme // Lukasevich Ya. O printsipe protivorechiya u Aristotelya. Kriticheskoe issledovanie. M.–SPb.: TsGI, 2012. S. 215-237.
39. Lukasevich Ya. O printsipe protivorechiya u Aristotelya. Kriticheskoe issledovanie. M.–SPb.: TsGI, 2012.
40. Leibnits G. Sochineniya v 4-kh t. M.: Mysl', 1982-1989.
41. Lega V.P. O dokazatel'stvakh bytiya Boga // Lega V.P. Filosofiya Plotina i patristika: vzglyad s tochki zreniya sovremennoi pravoslavnoi apologetiki. M.: Izd-vo PSTBI, 2002. S. 100-108.
42. Lavdzhoi A. Velikaya tsep' bytiya: Istoriya idei. M.: Dom intellektual'noi knigi, 2001.
43. Krichevskii A.V. Dokazatel'stva bytiya Boga // Novaya Filosofskaya Entsiklopediya. T. I. M.: Mysl', 2000. S. 285-286.
44. Kassirer E. Individ i kosmos v filosofii Vozrozhdeniya // Kassirer E. Izbrannoe: Individ i kosmos. SPb: Universitetskaya kniga i dr., 2000. S. 7-205.
45. Karpenko A.S. Neklassicheskie logiki versus klassicheskoi // Logiko-filosofskie shtudii. 2005. ¹ 3. S. 48-73.
46. Karpenko A.S. Logika, determinizm i fenomen proshlogo // Voprosy filosofii. 1995. ¹ 5. S. 72-81.
47. Karpenko A.S. Fatalizm i sluchainost' budushchego. M.: Nauka, 1990 (2-e izd. v 2007).
48. Kaký M. Fizika nevozmozhnogo. 3-e izd. M.: Al'pina non-fikshin, 2012.
49. Ishmuratov A.T., Karpenko A.S., Popov V.M. O paraneprotivorechivoi logike // Sintaksicheskie i semanticheskie issledovaniya neekstensional'nykh logik. M.: Nauka, 1989. S. 261-284.
50. Guts A.K. Elementy teorii vremeni. M.: LKI, 2012.
51. Zel'dovich Ya.B., Novikov I.D. Stroenie i evolyutsiya Vselennoi. M.: Nauka, 1975.
52. Guts A.K. Mashina vremeni. 1997. URL: http://www.univer.omsk.su/omsk/Sci/Time/time_z.win.htm.
53. Gardner M. Puteshestvie vo vremeni. M.: Mir, 1990.
54. Gaidenko P.P. Bytie i razum // Voprosy filosofii. 1997. ¹ 7. S. 114-140.
55. Vizgin V.P. Ideya mnozhestvennosti mirov: Ocherki istorii. 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. M.: Izd-vo LKI, 2007.
56. Vilenkin A. Mir mnogikh mirov. Fiziki v poiskakh inykh vselennykh. M.: Astrel'; CORPUS, 2011.
57. Vasil'ev N.A. Voobrazhaemaya logika. Izbrannye trudy. M.: Nauka, 1989.
58. Belovezhskii A.S. K-totalitarizm // Psevdonimy. M.-SPb.: TsGI, 2011. S. 63-116.
59. Barrou D. Novye teorii vsego. V poiskakh okonchatel'nogo ob''yasneniya. Minsk: Popurri, 2012.
60. Aristotel'. Sochineniya v 4-kh t. M.: Mysl', 1976-1984.
61. Ansel'm Kenterberiiskii. Proslogion // Ansel'm Kenterberiiskii. Sochi¬neniya. M.: Kanon, 1995.
62. Reforging the Great Chain of Being: Studies of the History of Modal Theories / Ed. S. Knuuttila. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1981 (2nd ed. in 2011).
63. Rijen J., van. The principle of plenitude, the de omni – per se distinction and the development of modal thinking // Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie. 1984. Vol. 66. ¹ 1. P. 61-88.
64. Rucker R. Infinity and the Mind: The Science and Philosophy of the Infinite. Delhi: New Age International Publishers, 2007.
65. Russell B. Our Knowledge of the External World. 2nd rev. ed. London: Allen and Unwin, 1926.
66. Salmi H. Cultural history, the possible, and the principle of plenitude // History and Theory. 2011. Vol. 50. P. 171-187.
67. Uzan J.-P. The fundamental constants and their variation: observational status and theoretical motivations // Rev. Mod. Phys. 2002. Vol. 75. ¹ 2. P. 403-455.
68. Wilson D.J. Lovejoy’s the great chain of being after fifty years // Journal of the History of Ideas. 1987. Vol. 48. ¹ 2. P. 187-206.
69. Wittgenstein L. Philosophical Remarks. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1975.
70. Yeo R.R. The principle of plenitude and natural theology in nineteenth-century Britain // The British Journal for the History of Science. 1986. Vol. 19. ¹ 3. P. 263-282.
71. Zagzebski L. The Dilemma of Freedom and Foreknowledge. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.