Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Politics and Society
Reference:

Kireeva, N. V. The Concept of Integrity in the System Theory of International Integration

Abstract: The author continues to view international integration as a system phenomenon. The functional approach to researching elements and components of integration as well as combination of the results of different decompositions create the image of the structure. Particular function of the element or component is represented as the interrelation which defi nes the order of inclusion of the part into the whole. In social environment the role of such relations is usually performed by social interests. Social interests have a complex structure and oriented from a subject to a subject. Social interests are presented as the internal sources of activity performed by international integration actors acting at all levels and in all spheres of social activity. If we use this approach, we can understand that governments are not the only actors of international integration and international treaties and agreements about creating the zones of free trade, customs unions, common economic areas are not the only forms of international integration. Examples from modern economic and political experience present individuals, enterprises, trans-national corporations, regions, states and inter-state units as integration actors.


Keywords:

International integration, actors of international integration, needs, social interests, regional international units, customs union, European integration, Eurasian integration, interstate units, integration.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Blauberg I.V., Yudin E.G. Stanovlenie i sushchnost' sistemnogo podkhoda. – M., 1973. Blauberg I.V., Judin Je.G. Stanovlenie i sushhnost' sistemnogo podhoda. – M., 1973.
2. Gegel' G.V.F. Filosofiya prava. – M., 1990. Gegel' G.V.F. Filosofija prava. – M., 1990.
3. Gegel' G.V.F. Raboty raznykh let. – M., 1972. T.2. Gegel' G.V.F. Raboty raznyh let. – M., 1972. T.2.
4. Evraziiskii ekonomicheskii soyuz: otnoshenie k proektu v stranakh SNG. Doklad RISI. // Problemy natsional'noi strategii. 2013. ¹ 1 (16). Evrazijskij jekonomicheskij sojuz: otnoshenie k proektu v stranah SNG. Doklad RISI. // Problemy nacional'noj strategii. 2013. ¹ 1 (16).
5. Zdravomyslov A.G. Potrebnosti. Interesy. Tsennosti. M., 1986. S.13-14. Zdravomyslov A.G. Potrebnosti. Interesy. Cennosti. M., 1986. S.13-14.
6. Zdravomyslov A.G. Problema interesa v sotsiologicheskoi teorii. – L.: Izd-vo LGU, 1964. Zdravomyslov A.G. Problema interesa v sociologicheskoj teorii. – L.: Izd-vo LGU, 1964.
7. Zdravomyslov A.G. Teoreticheskie i metodologicheskie problemy issledovaniya sotsial'nykh interesov. Avtoreferat diss. … d.filos.n. – M., 1969. Zdravomyslov A.G. Teoreticheskie i metodologicheskie problemy issledovanija social'nyh interesov. Avtoreferat diss. … d.filos.n. – M., 1969.
8. Kant I. Sochineniya. M., 1965. T.4. Ch.1. Kant I. Sochinenija. M., 1965. T.4. Ch.1.
9. Kireeva N.V. Potrebnosti sotsial'nogo sub''ekta kak sistema / Mosk. ped. gos. un-t im. V.I.Lenina.-M., 1997.-36 s.-Dep. v INION RAN 6.02.97, ¹ 52307. Kireeva N.V. Potrebnosti social'nogo sub#ekta kak sistema / Mosk. ped. gos. un-t im. V.I.Lenina.-M., 1997.-36 s.-Dep. v INION RAN 6.02.97, ¹ 52307.
10. Kuznetsov A.V. i dr. Monitoring vzaimnykh investitsii v SNG. // Tsentr integratsionnykh issledovanii EABR. 2012. Doklad ¹ 6. Kuznecov A.V. i dr. Monitoring vzaimnyh investicij v SNG. // Centr integracionnyh issledovanij EABR. 2012. Doklad ¹ 6.
11. Lober V.L. Rost i ukreplenie regional'nykh integratsionnykh struktur v Zapadnom Polusharii // Problemy regional'noi integratsii: politicheskie, ekonomicheskie i kul'turnye protsessy / Pod obshch. red. Yu.N. Gavrilova i L.O. Ternovoi. – M.: Izd-vo RAGS. 2007. Lober V.L. Rost i ukreplenie regional'nyh integracionnyh struktur v Zapadnom Polusharii // Problemy regional'noj integracii: politicheskie, jekonomicheskie i kul'turnye processy / Pod obshh. red. Ju.N. Gavrilova i L.O. Ternovoj. – M.: Izd-vo RAGS. 2007.
12. Setrov M.I. Printsip sistemnosti i ego osnovnye ponyatiya. // Problemy metodologii sistemnogo issledovaniya. – M: Mysl', 1970. Setrov M.I. Princip sistemnosti i ego osnovnye ponjatija. // Problemy metodologii sistemnogo issledovanija. – M: Mysl', 1970.
13. Kheifets B.A., Libman A.M. Korporativnaya integratsiya: Al'ternativa dlya postsovetskogo prostranstva. – M.: Izdatel'stvo LKI. 2008. Hejfec B.A., Libman A.M. Korporativnaja integracija: Al'ternativa dlja postsovetskogo prostranstva. – M.: Izdatel'stvo LKI. 2008.
14. Clark S. E. Spatial Concepts and Cross Border Governance Strategies: Comparing North American and Northern Europe Experience. Mimeo, 2002.
15. Dosh J., Hensengerth O. Subregional Cooperation in Southeast Asia: The Mekong Basin // European Journal of East Asian Studies. 2005. Vol. 4. ¹ 2.
16. Mayer F.M. Interpreting NAFTA: The Science and Art of Political Analysis. – N.Y.: Columbia University Press. 1998.
17. Stephenson P. Inter-Regionalism and Administrative Regions in European Cooperation. Paper presented at the CSGR Conference. Warwick. October 2005.