Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Actual problems of Russian law
Reference:

Imekova, M.P. Abandoning proprietary rights to a plot of land in the system of grounds for termination of proprietary rights to land

Abstract: The article includes comparative legal analysis of such grounds for termination of proprietary rights to land as abandonment of the proprietary rights by an owner and land transfer. The legislatively provided procedure for plots of land is different from other types of property due to a specific procedure for a person to abandon his land. It leads to some ambiguities in the judicial practice regarding legal qualification of such abandonment. For example, some courts have drawn a conclusion that abandonment serves as alienation of land, while these categories have some differences between them. The author has studied legal nature of the categories «abandonment of proprietary rights by an owner of a plot of land» and «alienation of plot of land», and she makes a conclusion that these two categories are considerably different. Additionally, it is established that in some cases the legislator provided special rules for the arising and termination of the proprietary rights in order to guarantee stability of a civil turnover and protect lawful rights and interests of certain groups of people. Abandonment of proprietary rights to a land plot is one of such cases. There is need to provide for the specific rules for termination and arising of proprietary rights to plots of land, which were previously abandoned by their owners due to specific features of land plots legal regulation regime.


Keywords:

jurisprudence, proprietary rights, termination, transfer, abandonment, primary means, secondary means, heirless property, find.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Khaskel'berg B. L., Rovnyy V. V. Perekhod vymorochnogo imushchestva k publichnomu obrazovaniyu // Nasledstvennoe pravo. – 2012. – ¹ 1. – S. 33-41.
2. Khaskel'berg B. L. Osnovaniya i sposoby priobreteniya prava sobstvennosti (obshchie voprosy) / Grazhdanskoe pravo: Izbrannye trudy / B. L. Khaskel'berg. – Tomsk: Krasnoe znamya, 2008. – S. 31-70.
3. Khayrullina N. M. Priobretatel'naya davnost': voprosy teorii i praktiki: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk / N. M. Khayrullina. – M., 2006. – 182 s.
4. Lomidze O. G. Pravonadelenie v grazhdanskom zakonodatel'stve Rossii: dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk / O. G. Lomidze. – Rostov-n/D, 2003. – 409 s.
5. Lisachenko L. A. Priobretenie prava sobstvennosti: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk / L. A. Lisachenko. – Ekaterinburg, 2002. – 195 s.
6. Burtovaya E. I. Prekrashchenie prava sobstvennosti po vole sobstvennika v sisteme osnovaniy i sposobov prekrashcheniya sub'ektivnogo prava sobstvennosti po zakonodatel'stvu RF: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk / E. I. Burtovaya. – Tomsk, 2011. – 240 s.
7. Khodyrev P. M. Ponyatie i vidy osnovaniy vozniknoveniya prava sobstvennosti // Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Pravovedenie. – 2007. – ¹ 6. – S. 57-62.