Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Actual problems of Russian law
Reference:

Bazarov, B .B. Limitation period in Russian tax law: definition and elements

Abstract: The article is devoted to the institution of limitation period in tax law; the author discusses its substantive and specific features and provides his own definition of it. He also points out a number of problems regarding incomplete character, lack of clarity and stability in the legislative regulation of this institution. It is important that in spite of the attention of the lawmaker, topicality and demand for the limitation period in tax law, it did not receive due attention among the tax law scholars, leading to incorrect understanding of nature of the regulating norms in this sphere, and therefore to incorrect practical application. The methodological basis for the work was formed by systemic, analytic and synthetic approaches to the analysis of the Russian tax law, judicial practice and other sources of law. It is necessary to point out that based upon the latest achievements of general legal theory on this issue, allowing to view the norms of tax law through the prism of doctrine. As a result, the author comes to a conclusion that the limitation period in tax law has some significant features, typical of the complex interdisciplinary institution of limitation period. At the same time, the author offers to add another significant characteristic feature to the list, which is legal regulation and provisions for limitation period being provided exclusively by law. This feature Is typical of both limitation period in tax law, and in general. Attention Is paid to the fact that while limitation is a key element of limitation period, these two terms should not be confused, since limitation is a large and more complex term, including several more obligatory and interrelated elements, characterizing its nature. The article also shows that the institution of limitation in tax law includes three types and a number of sub-types, which provides directions for the further studies.


Keywords:

tax law, legal institution, limitation, limitation period, substantive elements, stability, legalization, imperative character, term, violation, law.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Alekseev S.S. Struktura sovetskogo prava. M.: Yurid. lit., 1975. – 264 s.
2. Arkhipov A.A. Sroki v nalogovom prave: monografiya. M.: Statut, 2011. – 199 s.
3. Gumechuk V.I. Srok davnosti pri privlechenii k nalogovoy otvetstvennosti // Finansovoe pravo, 2005, ¹ 8. S. 30-32.
4. Voronoy Vadim Valer'evich. Priobretatel'naya davnost' po rossiyskomu grazhdanskomu pravu: Dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2004. – 191 s.
5. Vostrikova L.G. Sroki osushchestvleniya zashchity grazhdanskikh prav: Dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2000. – 159 s.
6. Guseva T.A. Srok davnosti vzyskaniya nalogov // Nalogovye spory: teoriya i praktika, 2007, ¹ 12. S. 10-15.
7. Kirillova M.Ya., Krasheninnikov P.V. Sroki v grazhdanskom prave. Iskovaya davnost'. M.: Statut, 2006. – 48 s.
8. Kirillova M.Ya. Iskovaya davnost'. M., 1966. – 156 s.
9. Lantukh, V.V. Iskovaya davnost' v sovremennom grazhdanskom prave Rossiyskoy Federatsii: dis... kand. yurid. nauk. Volgograd, 1999. – 137 s.
10. Lebedeva K.Yu. Iskovaya davnost' v sisteme grazhdansko-pravovykh srokov: Dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Tomsk, 2003. – 243 s.
11. Marchenko M.N., Deryabina E.M. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava. Skhemy s kommentariyami: Uchebnoe posobie. M.: Prospekt, 2012. – 198 s.
12. Meyer D.I. Russkoe grazhdanskoe pravo. M.: Statut, 1997.-455 c.
13. Mshvenieradze P.Ya. Institut davnosti v sovetskom ugolovnom prave. Tbilisi, 1967. – 256 s.
14. Orlov D.V. Davnost' privlecheniya k ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti po ugolovnomu pravu Rossii: Dis... kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2008. – 212 s.
15. Popova O.V. Sroki davnosti v Nalogovom kodekse Rossiyskoy Federatsii // "Bukhgalterskiy uchet". 2004. ¹
16. S. 40-44. 16.Ring M. P. Iskovaya davnost' v sovetskom grazhdanskom prave: Avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. M., 1952. – 18 c.
17. Rogatneva M.E. Organizatsionnye nalogovo-protsessual'nye sroki, ikh osnovnye otlichiya ot presekatel'nykh srokov // Finansovoe pravo. 2012. ¹ 12. S. 39-40.
18. Rudokvas A.D. Priobretatel'naya davnost' i davnostnoe vladenie: avtoreferat dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Sankt-Peterburg, 2011. – 43 s.
19. Serebrova D.A. Posledstviya nesoblyudeniya nalogovym organom srokov prinuditel'nogo vzyskaniya nedoimki // Yurist. 2009. ¹ 12. S. 31-36.
20. Spiridonov A.P. Protsessual'nye aspekty davnosti privlecheniya k ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti: Dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. L., 1989. – 206 s.
21. Tereshchenko T.A. Ponyatie iskovoy davnosti: Dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2006. – 206 s.
22. Toropkin S.A. Davnost' v rossiyskom prave (Problemy teorii i praktiki): Dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. N. Novgorod, 2004. – 185 s.
23. Farshatov I.A. Iskovaya davnost'. Zakonodatel'stvo: teoriya i praktika. M.: Gorodets, 2004. – 192 c.
24. Tsindeliani I.A. Pravovoe regulirovanie vzyskaniya nedoimok po nalogam, sboram, penyam i shtrafam s nalogoplatel'shchikov – fizicheskikh lits: sovremennoe zakonodatel'stvo i pravoprimenitel'naya praktika // Finansovoe pravo, 2012, ¹ 11, S. 16-17.
25. Tsygankov V.V. O vzyskanii s nalogoplatel'shchika nalogov i peni po istechenii sroka davnosti privlecheniya k nalogovoy otvetstvennosti // Pravo i ekonomika, 2008, ¹ 6. S. 64-65.
26. Chepik A.V. Davnost' kak yuridicheskaya konstruktsiya: teoretiko-pravovoy analiz: dis ... kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2009. – 194 s.
27. Engel'man I.E. O davnosti po russkomu grazhdanskomu pravu. Istoriko-dogmaticheskoe issledovanie / A. Engel'man. — 3-e izd. Vestnika prava. — SPb.: Senatskaya tip., 1901. – 424 s.