Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Kovalchuk, A. M. Symbol and Symbolization: Static Phenomenon and Dynamic Process

Abstract: The author of the article views the term ‘symbol’ as a philosophical category included in semiotic space of culture. The author also analyzes how the term developed in that space and discovers the differences and similarities between a sign and a symbol. Based on the analysis of differences between these two terms according to the leading philosophers, it is noted that the term ‘symbol’ has many meanings. At the same time, the term ‘sign’ has only one meaning. Symbol is good for creating a full picture while sign is better for creating a more accurate and precise picture. Based on examples from different spheres of human activity including speech, advertising, fine arts, and examples from Russian history, it is noted that during the periods of cultural crisis, sign is ‘exalted’ to symbol while previous symbols gain new contents. The author also describes different forms of reinterpretation of old symbols in a new environment.


Keywords:

symbol, sign, image, picture, symbolization, exaltation of a meaning, reinterpretation of a symbol, symbol in semiotics, cultural definitions, new culture.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Azarenko A.A. Simvol // Sovremennyy filosofskiy slovar' / pod obshch. red. d.f.n., professora V.E. Kemerova. 3-e izd., ispr. i dop. M.: Akademicheskiy proekt, 2004. S. 613-616.
2. Berdyaev N.A. Filosofiya svobody. Smysl tvorchestva. M.: Pravda, 1989.
3. Gegel' G.V.F. Lektsii po estetike. Ch. 2. Razvitie ideala v osobennye formy prekrasnogo v iskusstve // Gegel' G.V.F. Estetika. Estetika. T. 2. M.: Nauka, 1969.
4. Kant I. Kritika sposobnosti suzhdeniya // Soch.: v 8 t. T.
5. M.: Choro, 1994. 5. Knabe G.S. Materialy k lektsii po obshchey teorii kul'tury i kul'ture antichnogo Rima. M.: Indrik, 1994.
6. Kovalenko E.M. Kontseptsii simvola v filosofii kul'tury XX v. Rostov-n/D: Izd-vo SKNTs VSh APSN, 2006.
7. Koval'chuk A.M. Simvoly russkoy (etnokul'turnoy) identichnosti v pechatnoy reklame sooteche-stvennikov v Kitae // Sotsial'no-gumanitarnye nauki na Dal'nem Vostoke. 2013. ¹ 1. S. 140-146.
8. Losev A.F. Problema simvola i realisticheskoe iskusstvo. 2-e izd., ispr. M.: Iskusstvo, 1995.
9. Losev A.F. Znak. Simvol. Mif. M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1982.
10. Lotman Yu.M. Vnutri myslyashchikh mirov. Chelovek — tekst — semiosfera — istoriya. M.: Yazyki rus-skoy kul'tury, 1996.
11. Mamardashvili M.K. Simvol i soznanie / M.K. Mamardashvili, A.M. Pyatigorskiy. SPb: Azbuka, Azbuka-Attikus, 2011.
12. Pelipenko A.A. Kul'tura kak sistema / A.A. Pelipenko, I.G. Yakovlev. M.: Yazyki russkoy kul'tury, 1998.
13. Pirs Ch.S. Izbrannye filosofskie proizvedeniya. M.: Logos, 2000.
14. Rubtsov N.N. Simvol v iskusstve i zhizni: filosofskie razmyshleniya. M.: Nauka, 1991.
15. Tsareva E.A. Simvol v usloviyakh izmeneniya sotsiokul'turnogo bytiya. Kursk, 2006.
16. Yakovleva E.L. Mif i ego tekhnologii v sovetskom prostranstve // Sovetskoe obshchestvo i sovetskiy chelovek: mify i real'nost'. Sb. dokladov Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Kazan': KGASU, 2012