Šóń Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 2065,   Articles in work: 293 Declined articles: 786 
Library

Titov P.S. On participation of the legal representative in evidence-gathering

Published in journal "Politics and Society", 2013-6 in rubric "Main human rights and liberties", pages 746-751.

Resume: This work offers several propositions, intended for the optimization of criminal procedure Law at the preliminary investigation stage from the point of view of the legal representative in terms of evidence-gathering. Analyzing scientific points of view on the issue at hand, effective Laws and current legal practice, and using analogy and historical experience, the author concludes that the creation of a new institute of criminal procedure Law – the institute of procedure-related actions of the legal representative; and the implementation of which into Criminal procedure Law, is a necessity. This construct will allow to regulate the new institute in Russian Criminal Procedure code, and to regulate the conditions and forms of the legal representative’s procedure in information-gathering. This article offers a scientific approach, which would allow the legal representative takes part in evidence-gathering, while assisting the investigator, or the Court by gathering, its procedural consolidation and its presentation to proper personnel. Using this approach in criminal procedure will allow for a broad and objective research of the crime scene and ensure due process in modern criminal procedure.

Keywords: Jurisprudence, criminal Law, evidence, proof, means for evidence-gathering, legal representative, incriminatory lean, equal rights of prosecution and defense

DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.6.8077

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

Bibliography:
1. Bitokova M.Kh. Pravo sobiraniya dokazatel'stv zashchitnikom i ego osushchestvlenie v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: dis. kand. yur. nauk. M., 2008.
2. Kuptsova S.N. Pravo zashchitnika na sobiranie dokazatel'stv i problema sostyazatel'nosti v ugolovnom protsesse // Sbornik nauchnykh trudov SevKavGTU. Seriya «Gumanitarnye nauki». 2010. ¹ 8.
3. Makarova Z.V. Uchastie advokata-zashchitnika na predvaritel'nom sledstvii. Kuybyshev, 1978.
4. Mikhaylovsvkaya I.B. Kommentariy k Ugolovno-protsessual'nomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii (postateynyy) (6-e izdanie, pererabotannoe i dopolnennoe) / Pod red. I.L. Petrukhina. M.: OOO «TK Velbi», 2008.
5. Navasardyan V.R. Pravo na zashchitu podozrevaemogo, obvinyaemogo i podsudimogo v ugolovnom protsesse. SPb., 2000.
6. Ugolovnyy protsess Rossii: uchebnik / Pod red. V.T. Tomina. M.: Yurayt, 2003.
7. Kommentariy k Ugolovno-protsessual'nomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii / Pod red. I.L. Petrukhina. M.: OOO «TK Velbi», 2002.
8. Putin V.V. Demokratiya i kachestvo gosudarstva // gazeta «Komersant'», 2012, ¹ 20/P.
9. Smirnov A.V. Modeli ugolovnogo protsessa. SPb., 2000.
10. Stetsovskiy Yu.I. Advokat v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. M., 1972.
11. Khromenko V.V. Total'nyy obvinitel'nyy uklon pravookhraniteley // gazeta «Duel'», 2007, ¹ 1-2.

Correct link to this article:
just copy this link to clipboard