|
Library
|
Your profile |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|
Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law
Reference:
Ivanov S.A.
Distinguishing Features
of the Comparative Legal Studies
and Cross-Cultural Study of Law
// Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law.
2013. ¹ 2.
P. 220-224.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=62841
Ivanov S.A. Distinguishing Features of the Comparative Legal Studies and Cross-Cultural Study of LawAbstract: Comparative legal studies and cross-cultural studies of law are two distinct types of legal research. They differ from each other in a research objectives, methods of organization, methodology of the study, the nature of the legal conclusions. Such differentiation is necessary to prevent erroneous scientific conclusions and inadequate attempts to transform social practice. Keywords: comparative law, comparative law research, cross-cultural study of law, comparative legal method, genetic (historical narrative) method, the legal criterion of comparison, the methodology of comparative law study of the problem of the comparative legal studies, comparative law and legal geography as scientific specialty, tasks, cross-cultural study of law.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here . References
1. Baranskiy N.N. Ekonomicheskaya geografiya. Ekonomicheskaya kartografiya. 2-e izd. M.: Geografgiz, 1960.
2. Markov D.F. Sravnitel'no-istoricheskie i kompleksnye issledovaniya v obshchestvennykh naukakh: Iz opyta iz-ucheniya istorii i kul'tury Tsentral'noy i Yugo-Vostochnoy Evropy. M.: Nauka, 1983. 3. Prokhorov Yu.E. Lingvostranovedenie. Kul'turovedenie. Stranovedenie: Metod. pos. M.: IRYaL, 1995. 4. Mironenko N.S. Stranovedenie: teoriya i metody: ucheb. posobie dlya vuzov. M.: Aspekt Press, 2001. 5. Oksamytnyy V.V. Sravnitel'noe pravovedenie i zakonovedenie: ucheb. posobie. Bryansk: Izd-vo RIO «Bryanskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet», 2011. 6. Marchenko M.N. Sravnitel'noe pravovedenie. Obshchaya chast'. ucheb. posobie dlya yur. vuzov. M.: Zertsalo, 2001. 7. Stranovedenie // Bol'shaya sovetskaya entsiklopediya. T. 24. Kn. 1. M.: Izdatel'stvo «Sovetskaya entsiklopediya», 1976. S. 546. Stolb. 1624. 8. Kosarev A. O predmete istorii gosudarstva i prava v «klassicheskom» uchebnike // Yuridicheskoe obrazovanie i nauka. 2006. ¹ 2. 9. Romanov A.A. Zarubezhnoe turistskoe stranovedenie: ucheb. posobie. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Sov. Sport, 2001. 10. Romanov A.K. Pravovaya sistema Anglii: ucheb. posobie. 2-e izd., ispr. M.: Delo, 2002. 11. Lafitskiy V.I. Osnovy konstitutsionnogo stroya SShA. M.: Norma, 1998. 12. Ivanov K.I. Stanovlenie pravovoy sistemy Litovskoy Respubliki: 1990-2009 gg.: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. SPb: S.-Peterb. Gos. un-t ekonomiki i finansov, 2011. 13. Stepanova T.V. Identifikatsiya pravovoy sistemy Kitayskoy Narodnoy Respubliki: voprosy teorii: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Vladimir: VYuI FSIN, 2010. 14. Ivanyuk O.A., Rafalyuk E.E. Modernizatsiya nomenklatury spetsial'nostey nauchnykh rabotnikov v sfere yuri-sprudentsii // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2011. ¹ 6 |
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
Eng
