'The problems of formation of the modern model of administrative judicial procedure in Russia' Administrative and municipal law nbpublish.com
Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Prizhennikova, A.N. The problems of formation of the modern model of administrative judicial procedure in Russia

Published in journal "Administrative and municipal law", 2013-6 , pages 673-679.

Resume: Currently there is a judicial reform going on in Russia, and its goal is to form an independent and fair judicial power. In order to support the status of the judicial power and to improve the judicial system, the Russian legislation is being constantly amended. As part of the judicial reform, the new draft of the Federal Law N. 246960 Code for the Administrative Judicial Procedure in the Russian Federation, allowing for the due implementation of Art. 118 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, was introduced to the State Duma on March 28, 2013. Art 118 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation provides for the four types of judicial procedure: constitutional, civil, administrative and criminal. The work on the draft of the administrative judicial procedure legal draft was started in the end of XX century, and the first draft of the Code was presented. The first draft Code gained various evaluations in the scientific literatures, and it used a number of old stereotypes of the Soviet era.

Keywords: The Code for the Administrative Judicial Procedure, administrative justice, judicial reform, administrative dispute, administrative case, administrative claim, administrative procedures, public procedure, simplified procedure.

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.06.12

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

Bibliography:
1. Zelentsov A.B. Teoreticheskie problemy administrativnogo iska // Pravovedenie. 2005. 6; On zhe.
Administrativnoe sudoproizvodstvo v Rossii: problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya // Konstitutsionnoe
pravo: vostochnoevropeyskoe obozrenie. 2003. 2; Kryazhkov V., Starilov Yu.N. Administrativnye
sudy: kakimi im byt'? // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2001. 1. S. 18; Simonyan S.L. O proekte Kodeksa
administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva RF // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2006. 1; Fokov A.P.
O Kodekse Administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. 2007. 1. S. 2; Minnikes
I.A. O sozdanii administrativnykh sudov v Rossiyskoy Federatsii (v aspekte obsuzhdeniya proekta Kodeksa
administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva RF) // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. 2007. 8. S. 8-10; Yaroshenko N.I.
Administrativnyy protsessual'nyy kodeks RF: kakimi emu byt' // Administrator suda. 2012. 2.
2. Razorenov K.I. K voprosu o printsipakh administrativno-yurisdiktsionnogo protsessa // Administrativnoe
pravo i protsess. 2010. 4; Shergin A.P. Protsessual'naya sostavlyayushchaya pravovogo regulirovaniya ad-
ministrativnoy otvetstvennosti // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2010. 3.
3. Nikolaeva L.A., Solov'eva A.K. Administrativno-pravovye problemy teorii i praktiki razresheniya pu-
blichno-pravovykh sporov. SPb.: Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press. 2004. S. 112.
4. Khamaneva N.Yu., Salishcheva N.G. Grazhdanin i publichnaya vlast' // Administrativnoe pravo: teoriya i praktika.
Materialy nauchnoy konferentsii. M., 28 noyabrya 2001 g.; Khamaneva N.Yu. Reforma sudebnoy vlasti: nuzhny
li administrativnye sudy v Rossii? // Grazhdanin i pravo. 2001. 5.
5. Krapivkina O.A. Sub'ekt osobogo mneniya konstitutsionnogo sud'i: skriptor ili lichnost'? // Zhurnal kon-
stitutsionnogo pravosudiya. 2011. 6 // SPS Konsul'tant Plyus.
6. Sivak N.V. Uproshchennye sudebnye proizvodstva, osnovannye na maloznachitel'nosti zayavlennykh trebova-
niy. URL //http://www.juristlib.ru

Correct link to this article:
just copy this link to clipboard