Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Administrative and municipal law
Reference:

Prizhennikova, A.N. The problems of formation of the modern model of administrative judicial procedure in Russia

Abstract: Currently there is a judicial reform going on in Russia, and its goal is to form an independent and fair judicial power. In order to support the status of the judicial power and to improve the judicial system, the Russian legislation is being constantly amended. As part of the judicial reform, the new draft of the Federal Law N. 246960 “Code for the Administrative Judicial Procedure in the Russian Federation”, allowing for the due implementation of Art. 118 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, was introduced to the State Duma on March 28, 2013. Art 118 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation provides for the four types of judicial procedure: constitutional, civil, administrative and criminal. The work on the draft of the administrative judicial procedure legal draft was started in the end of XX century, and the first draft of the Code was presented. The first draft Code gained various evaluations in the scientific literatures, and it used a number of old stereotypes of the Soviet era.


Keywords:

The Code for the Administrative Judicial Procedure, administrative justice, judicial reform, administrative dispute, administrative case, administrative claim, administrative procedures, public procedure, simplified procedure.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Zelentsov A.B. Teoreticheskie problemy administrativnogo iska // Pravovedenie. — 2005. — ¹ 6; On zhe. Administrativnoe sudoproizvodstvo v Rossii: problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya // Konstitutsionnoe pravo: vostochnoevropeiskoe obozrenie. — 2003. — ¹ 2; Kryazhkov V., Starilov Yu.N. Administrativnye sudy: kakimi im byt'? // Rossiiskaya yustitsiya. — 2001. — ¹ 1. — S. 18; Simonyan S.L. O proekte Kodeksa administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva RF // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. — 2006. — ¹ 1; Fokov A.P. O Kodekse Administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva // Rossiiskii sud'ya. — 2007. — ¹ 1. — S. 2; Minnikes I.A. O sozdanii administrativnykh sudov v Rossiiskoi Federatsii (v aspekte obsuzhdeniya proekta Kodeksa administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva RF) // Rossiiskii sud'ya. — 2007. —¹ 8. — S. 8-10; Yaroshenko N.I. Administrativnyi protsessual'nyi kodeks RF: kakimi emu byt' // Administrator suda. — 2012. — ¹ 2.
2. Razorenov K.I. K voprosu o printsipakh administrativno-yurisdiktsionnogo protsessa // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. — 2010. — ¹ 4; Shergin A.P. Protsessual'naya sostavlyayushchaya pravovogo regulirovaniya ad-ministrativnoi otvetstvennosti // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. — 2010. — ¹ 3.
3. Nikolaeva L.A., Solov'eva A.K. Administrativno-pravovye problemy teorii i praktiki razresheniya pu-blichno-pravovykh sporov. SPb.: Yuridicheskii tsentr «Press». — 2004. — S. 112.
4. Khamaneva N.Yu., Salishcheva N.G. Grazhdanin i publichnaya vlast' // Administrativnoe pravo: teoriya i praktika. Materialy nauchnoi konferentsii. — M., 28 noyabrya 2001 g.; Khamaneva N.Yu. Reforma sudebnoi vlasti: nuzhny li administrativnye sudy v Rossii? // Grazhdanin i pravo. — 2001. — ¹ 5.
5. Krapivkina O.A. Sub''ekt osobogo mneniya konstitutsionnogo sud'i: skriptor ili lichnost'? // Zhurnal kon-stitutsionnogo pravosudiya. — 2011. — ¹ 6 // SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus».
6. Sivak N.V. Uproshchennye sudebnye proizvodstva, osnovannye na maloznachitel'nosti zayavlennykh trebova-nii. URL //http://www.juristlib.r