Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law
Reference:
A.S. Ispolinov
Balancing Between the Freedom
of Internal Market and Human Rights
in the Judicial Practice of The EU
// Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law.
2012. ¹ 6.
P. 38-49.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=62015
1.
|
Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services, OJ 1997 L 18.
|
2.
|
Case 26/62 Van Gend en Loos v Nederlandse Administratie der Belastingen ECR [1963] 1. Sm. takzhe Case 6/64 Flamingo Costa v. ENEL [1964] ECR 586.
|
3.
|
Case 29/69 Stauder v City of Ulm, [1969] ECR, para. 7.
|
4.
|
Case 36/75 Roland Rutili v Ministre de l’intérieur [1975] ECR 1219.
|
5.
|
Case 40/64 Sgarlata and others v. Commission of the EC [1965] ECR 215.
|
6.
|
Case C-112/00 Eugen Schmidberger, Internationale Transporte und Planzüge v Austria [2003] ECR I-5659.
|
7.
|
Case C-260/98 Elliniki Radiophonia Tileorassi Anonimi Etairia (ERT AE) v. Dimotiki Etairia Pliroforissis (DEP) and Sotirios Kouvelas [1991] ECR I-2925.
|
8.
|
Case C-265/95 Commission v France [1997] ECR I-6959.
|
9.
|
Case C-309/96 Annibaldi [1997] ECR I-7493.
|
10.
|
Cases C-46 and 48/93 Brasserie du Pecheur SA v. Germany [1996] ECR I-1029.
|
11.
|
Case Frontini v Ministerio delle Finanze, judgment of December 27, 1973, Guir. Const. 2401.
|
12.
|
Sases 36-38/59 40/59 Greitling v High Authority of the ECSC [1960] ECR 859.
|
13.
|
Case C-341/05 Laval un Partneri Ltd v Svenska Byggnadsarbetareförbundet, Svenska Byggnadsarbetareförbundets avd. 1, Byggettan, Svenska Elektrikerförbundet, Laval, 18 December 2007.
|
14.
|
Case C-438/05 International Transport Workers’ Federation, Finnish Seamen’s Union v Viking Line ABP, OÜ Viking Line Eesti, Viking, 11 December 2007.
|
15.
|
Case C-36/02 Omega Spielhallen—und Automatenaufstellungs—GmbH v Oberbürgermeisterin der Bundesstadt Bonn [2004] ECR I-9609.
|
16.
|
Case 1/58 Stork & Cie v ECSC High Authority [1959] ECR 43.
|
17.
|
Case No 11/70 Internationale Hanselsgesellschaft mbH v. Einfuhr-und Vorratsstelle fur Getreide und Futtermittel [1970] ECR, p.419, par. 7.
|
18.
|
Case 4/ 73 Nold KG v. Commission [1974] ECR, p. 491, par. 13.
|
19.
|
Case 5/88 Herbert Wachauf v. Bundesamt f ¨ur Ern¨ahrung und Forstwirtschaft, [1989] ECR 2609, par. 19.
|
20.
|
Case C-6 and 9/90 Francovich and Bonifaci v. Italy [1991], ECR I-5357.
|
21.
|
Charles F. Sabel and Oliver Gerstenberg “Constitutionalizing an Overlapping Consensus: The ECJ and the Emergence of a Coordinate Constitutional Order” // European Law Journal, Vol. 16, No. 5, September 2010, pp. 511–550.
|
22.
|
Coppel J. and O’Neill, A. “The European Court of Justice: Taking rights seriously” (1995) 29 C.M.L.Rev, 669.
|
23.
|
Doğan Y. “The Fundamental Rights Jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice: protection for human rights within the European legal order” //Ankara Law Review, Vol. 54 6, No. 1, pages 53-81,
|
24.
|
Douglas-Scott S. “A tale of two courts: Luxembourg, Strasbourg and the growing European human rights acquis” // Common Market Law Review, vol 34, 2006, page 645.
|
25.
|
Payandeh M. “Constitutional review of EU law after HONEYWELL: contextualizing the relationship between the German Constitutional Court and the EU Court of Justice. // Common Market Law Review vol. 48 9–38, 2011.
|
26.
|
Rosas A. “Justice in Haste, Justice denied? The European Court of Justice and the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice” // Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, volume 11, 2008-2009, page 10.
|
27.
|
Skouris V. “Fundamental Rights and Fundamental Freedoms: The Challenge of Striking a Delicate Balance”, [2006] EBLR 229
|