|
Library
|
Your profile |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:
Kirsberg, I. V.
How to Disguise Theology as Science from the Point of View of Phenomenology
// Philosophy and Culture.
2012. ¹ 11.
P. 29-38.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=61640
Kirsberg, I. V. How to Disguise Theology as Science from the Point of View of PhenomenologyAbstract: The first part of the article describes the grounds for viewing theology as a science. The author shows the axiological (instead of cognitive) quality of theology. Based on the analysis of interaction between feelings and cogitation, the author shows how diverse theology as a discipline, although it is admitted that the axiological elements prevail. Religious studies are analyzed in the same way and the author shows their cognitive and scientific (but not axiological) meaning, diversity and the prevailing tendency as a discipline. The second part of the article shows the possibility to disguise theology as science as well as opportunities of phenomenology and its advantages over post-positivism in such disguise. The author also describes the non-theology phenomenology in Edmund Husserl’s religious studies based on the analysis of the difference between axiological and cognitive meanings. Keywords: philosophy, phenomenology, demarcation, theology, disguise, pseudoscience, religious studies, value, knowledge, science.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here . References
1. Kirsberg I.V. K soznaniyu Biblii. Fenomenologicheskoe proniknovenie v zhivoe. Saarbruecken: LAP Lambert Academic Pbl., 2011.
2. Nauchnye i bogoslovskie epistemologicheskie paradigmy: istoricheskaya dinamika i universal'nye osnovaniya, (pod red. V.N. Porusa), M.: BBI, 2009. 3. Problema demarkatsii nauki i teologii: sovremennyy vzglyad. M.:IFRAN, 2008. 4. Tulmin S. Chelovecheskoe ponimanie. M.: Progress, 1984. 5. Braun H.J. Elemente des Religioesen. Aufbau und Zerfall seiner Phaenomene. Zuerich: Artemis Vlg., 1993. 6. Colpe C. Theologie, Ideologie, Religionswissenschaft. Muenchen: Chr. Kaiser Vlg.,1980. 7. Cox J.L. A Guide to the Phenomenology of Religion (Key Figures, Formative Influences and Subsequent Debates). London — New York: Graham Harvey, 2006. 8. Flood G. Beyond Phenomenology. Rethinking the Study of Religion. London — New York: Cassel, 2007. 9. Kulturhermeneutik. Interdisziplinaere Beitraege zum Umgang mit kultureller Differenz. Muenchen: Wilgelm Fink Vlg., 2008. 10. Lonergan J.F. A Second Collection. Philad.: The Westminster Press, 1974. 11. Noch eine Chance fuer die Religionsphaenomenologie? Bern: Peter Lang, 2001. 12. Pannenberg W. Wissenschaftstheorie und Theologie. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp Vlg., 1973. 13. Religious Consciousness and Life-Worlds. Shimla — New Delhi: Indian Inst. of Advanced Study, Indus Publ. Com., 1988. 14. Smart N. The Phenomenon of Religion. London: Macmillan, 1973 |
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
Eng
