Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Prokofiev, A. V. Protection of Future Generation Interests: Utilitarian Perspective

Abstract: The given article analyzes pluses and minuses of the utilitarian ethics as the grounds for moral criteria of the decision making process which touches the interests of future generations. The author shows that utilitarianism does not have any difficulties with involvement of future generations into the moral community and this is the advantage compared to moral conceptions based on agreement. However, it also requires the discounting of future benefits and costs which in its turn demands special ethical grounds. The author shows the conditional and situation nature of all arguments for the benefit of discounting and makes a conclusion that utilitarian approach cannot be the only one officially recognized methodology of ethics of the future. Utilitarian methods of decision making process including the analysis of benefits and costs play an important role in social and ethical researches dedicated to the problem of protection of interests of future generations but they must be combined with other ways and methods of discovering of the public good from the point of view of generation relations.


Keywords:

philosophy, morals, ethics, economics, utilitarianism, justice, future, discounting, resources, eco systems.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Apresyan R.G. Moral'no-filosofskiy smysl dilemmy antropotsentrizma i non-antropotsentrizma // Eticheskaya mysl'. Vyp. 10. M.: IF RAN, 2010. S. 5-19.
2. Prokof'ev A.V. Po tu storonu bespristrastnosti // Chelovek. 2009. ¹
3. S. 21-34. 3. Ackerman F., Heinzerling L. Pricing the Priceless: Cost-Benefit Analysis of Environmental Protection // University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 2001. Vol. 50. P. 1553-1584.
4. Arrow K.J. Discounting, Morality, and Gaming // Discounting and Intergenerational Equity / Ed. P. Portney and J. Weyant. Washington: Resources for the Future, 1999. P. 13-21.
5. Beckerman W., Hepburn C. Ethics of the Discount Rate in the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change // World Economics. 2007. Vol. 8. ¹ 1. P. 187-210.
6. Chapman G.B. Time Preferences for the Very Long Term // Acta Psychologia. 2001. Vol. 108. ¹ 2. P. 95-116.
7. Cowen T. Caring about the Distant Future: Why It Matters and What It Means // The University of Chicago Law Review. 2007. Vol. 74. ¹ 1. P. 5-40.
8. Dasgupta P.S., Heal G.M. Economic Theory and Exhaustible Resources. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979. 501 p.
9. Heinzerling L. Discounting Our Future // Land and Water Law Review. 1999. Vol. 34. ¹ 1. P. 40-74.
10. Johannesson M., Johansson P.-O. The Discounting of Lives Saved in Future Generations — Some Empirical Results // Health Economics. 1996. Vol. 5. ¹. 4. P. 329-332.
11. Mulgan T. Understanding Utilitarianism. Stocksfield: Acumen, 2007. 194 p.
12. Norton B. Commodity, Amenity, and Morality: The Limits of Quantification of Valuing Biodiversity // Biodiversity / Ed. by E.O. Wilson. Washington: National Academy Press, 1988. P. 200-206.
13. Pearce D.W., Mourato S., Atkinson G. Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment: Recent Developments. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2006. 316 p.
14. Posner E.A. Agencies Should Ignore Distant-Future Generations // The University of Chicago Law Review. 2007. Vol. 74. ¹ 1. P. 139-143.
15. Revesz R.L. Environmental Regulation, Cost-Benefit Analysis, and the Discounting of Human Lives // Columbia Law Review. 1999. Vol. 99. ¹ 4. P. 941-1017.
16. Sidgwick H. The Methods of Ethics. L.: Macmillan, 1884. 507 p.
17. Smart J.J. An Outline of a System of Utilitarian Ethics // Smart J.J., Williams B.O. Utilitarianism: For and Against. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973. P. 3-76.
18. Sunstein C. Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment // Ethics. 2005. Vol. 115. ¹ 2. P. 351-385.
19. Sunstein C, Rowell A. On Discounting Regulatory Benefits: Risk, Money, and Intergenerational Equity // American Economic Review. 2007. Vol. 74. P. 171-208