|
Library
|
Your profile |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|
Law and Politics
Reference:
Zarovneva, G.S.
Problems of differentiation of forms of preliminary investigation
// Law and Politics.
2012. ¹ 7.
P. 1219-1226.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=51795
Zarovneva, G.S. Problems of differentiation of forms of preliminary investigationAbstract: In this article based on the analysis of the opinions of scientists and the current legislation the author views the problems of differentiation of forms of preliminary investigation: inquiry, investigation and mixed forms. The author analyzes the powers of an inquirer, investigator, and prosecutor. Then the author provides grounds for the position that there is more perspective for the formation of the preliminary investigation, rather than abolishing inquiry, since it would not duly provide for the procedural economy. Keywords: jurisprudence, investigation, inquiry, form, investigator, inquirer, differentiation, mixed form, reform.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here . References
1. Bykov V.M. Aktual'nye problemy ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: monografiya. – Kazan', 2008.
2. Vlasova N.A. Sushchnost' doznaniya i problemy reglamentatsii // Trudy VNII MVD. 2007. ¹1. 3. Gir'ko S.I. Suzhdeniya ob ugolovno-protsessual'noy deyatel'nosti militsii v rezhime novoyu UPK Rossii 4. // Novyy ugolovno-protsessual'nyy zakon: teoriya i praktika primeneniya: Materialy mezhvedomstvennogo 5. «kruglogo stola». M..2003. 6. Ermishina N.S. Sledstvie v Rossii // Zakonodatel'stvo. 2009. ¹11. 7. .Esina A.S. Proizvodstvo doznaniya organami vnutrennikh del: nekotorye protsessual'nye i organizatsionnye 8. aspekty [Elektronnyy resurs]. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus». 9. Esina A.S. Doznanie: monografiya. M.: Norma, 2005. 10. Kornienko V.T. Predvaritel'noe sledstvie i sostyazatel'nyy sudebnyy protsess v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 11. Konflikt interesov // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. 2008. ¹4. 12. Korolev G. Reorganizatsiya dosudebnogo proizvodstva: problemy i perspektivy // Zakonnost'. 2008. ¹1. 13. Kuznetsova Yu.V., Annenkov S.I., Gromov N.A. Doznanie i predvaritel'noe sledstvie: sushchnost', zadachi i zna- 14. chenie stadii predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya // Sledovatel'. 2005. ¹4 15. Malysheva O.A. K voprosu o sovershenstvovanii pravovogo regulirovaniya dosudebnogo proizvodstva po ugo- 16. lovnym delam // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. 2008. ¹4. 17. .Malysheva O.A. Neobkhodimost' sovershenstvovaniya protsessual'noy formy doznaniya: postanovka problemy 18. // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2010 ¹3. 19. Markovicheva E.V. Proizvodstvo doznaniya po delam o prestupleniyakh nesovershennoletnikh: za i protiv // 20. Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2008. ¹3. S. 57. 21. Oleynik V.I. Reformirovanie organov prokuratury i pravovoe regulirovanie ikh vzaimodeystviya s organami 22. predvaritel'nogo sledstviya // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2009. ¹23. 23. Osipov A.A. O sub'ektakh, osushchestvlyayushchikh predvaritel'noe rassledovanie v forme doznaniya po deystvuyushchemu 24. ugolovno-protsessual'nomu zakonodatel'stvu RF // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2009. ¹11. 25. Ryzhakov A.P. Ugolovnyy protsess. Pod red. A.P. Ryzhakova. M.: 2007. 26. Suslov V.M. Voprosy reglamentatsii deyatel'nosti organov doznaniya v UPK RF // Novyy ugolovno-protsessu- 27. al'nyy zakon: teoriya i praktika primeneniya: Materialy mezhvedomstvennogo «kruglogo stola».-M.; Izd-vo 28. Mosk. un-ta MVD Rossii, 2003. 29. Suchkov A.V. Nekotorye aspekty sravnitel'nogo analiza form predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya: doznaniya i 30. predvaritel'nogo sledstviya // Yuridicheskiy analiticheskiy zhurnal. 2006. ¹2 (16). 31. Frantsiforov Yu.V. Aktual'nye problemy proizvodstva predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya v forme doznaniya // 32. Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. 2010. ¹2. |
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
Eng
