Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law
Reference:

B.I. Osminin Participation of the Parliament in Decision–Making on the Consent of a State to Be Bound by International Treaties (comparative–legal analysis)

Abstract: The article is devoted to the role of the parliaments of various countries in the decision–making on the consent to be bound by international treaties. In many states parliamentary approval is legally binding for the conclusion of the most important international treaties. Parliamentary approval increasingly has become a precondition for the internal effect of international treaties. In some countries (the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada) parliamentary approval is not legally necessary for the adoption of the international treaty obligations. The absence of disapproval of parliament is considered to be sufficient for the adoption of a decision on the ratification of the treaty.

Keywords:

parliamentary approval of international treaties, parliamentary scrutiny, express approval, tacit approval, the absence of disapproval, Ponsonby Rule, “treaties”, congressional–executive agreements, executive agreements pursuant to treaties, presidential (sole) executive agreements.

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Literatura na russkom yazyke:
2. 1. Byudzhetnyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 31.07.1998. ¹ 145–FZ // SZ RF: 1998. ¹ 31. St. 3823; 1999. ¹ 28.
3. St. 3492; 2007. ¹ 18. St. 2117.
4. 2. Zakon Ukrainy ot 29 iyunya 2004 g. ¹ 1906–IV «O mezhdunarodnykh dogovorakh Ukrainy» // Golos Ukrainy.
5. 2004. 3 avg.
6. 3. Konstitutsii gosudarstv Ameriki: V 3-kh tt. / Pod red. T.Ya. Khabrievoi. M., 2006.
7. 4. Konstitutsii gosudarstv Evropy: V 3-kh tt. / Pod obshch. red. L.A. Okun'kova. M., 2000.
8. 5. Osminin B.I. Zaklyuchenie i implementatsiya mezhdunarodnykh dogovorov i vnutrigosudarstvennoe pravo:
9. [monografiya]. M., 2010.
10. 6. Federal'nyi zakon ot 19.07.1998. ¹ 114–FZ «O voenno–tekhnicheskom sotrudnichestve Rossiiskoi Federatsii
11. s inostrannymi gosudarstvami // SZ RF: 1998. ¹ 30. St. 3610; 2007. ¹ 21. St. 2466.
12. 7. Federal'nyi zakon ot 26.03.1998. ¹ 41–FZ «O dragotsennykh metallakh i dragotsennykh kamnyakh» // SZ RF: 1998.
13. ¹ 13. St. 1463.
14. 8. Federal'nyi zakon ot 15.07.1995. ¹ 101–FZ «O mezhdunarodnykh dogovorakh Rossiiskoi Federatsii» // SZ RF:
15. 1995. ¹ 29. St. 2757; 2007. ¹ 49. St. 6079.
16. 9. Federal'nyi zakon ot 23.06.1995. ¹ 93–FZ «O poryadke predostavleniya Rossiiskoi Federatsiei voennogo i
17. grazhdanskogo personala dlya uchastiya v deyatel'nosti po podderzhaniyu ili vosstanovleniyu mezhdunarodnogo
18. mira i bezopasnosti» // SZ RF: 1995. ¹ 26. St. 2401.
19. 10. Federal'nyi zakon ot 05.03.2004. ¹ 8–FZ «O priznanii utrativshimi silu otdel'nykh polozhenii aktov
20. zakonodatel'stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii o kosmicheskoi deyatel'nosti» // SZ RF: 2004. ¹ 10. St. 834.
21. Literatura na inostrannom yazyke:
22. 1. Agreements Pursuant to the Constitutional Authority of the President // U.S. Department of State Foreign Affairs
23. Manual. Vol. 11–Political Affairs. 09–25–2006.
24. 2. Alkema E.A. International Law in Domestic Systems // Electronic Journal of Comparative Law. Vol. 14.3 (December
25. 2010) // http://www.ejcl.org/143/art143–1.pdf.
26. 3. The Atomic Energy Act (1954, Public Law 83–703, as Amended). In: Nuclear Regulatory Legislation. NUREG–0980.
27. Vol. 1. ¹ 7. Rev. 1. June 2006.
28. 4. Barrett. J. The United Kingdom and Parliamentary Scrutiny of Treaties: Recent Reforms // International and
29. Comparative Law Quarterly. 2011. Vol. 60. Part 1.
30. 5. Canada’s Approach to the Treaty–Making Process. Parliamentary Information and Research Service. Legal and
31. Legislative Affairs Division. 24 November 2008.
32. 6. Canada Treaty Information. Policy on Tabling of Treaties in Parliament. January 2008. http:www.treaty–accord.
33. gc.ca/procedure.asp. Date Modified: 2011–03–22.
34. 7. The Case–Zablocki Act on Transmittal of International Agreements and Related Reporting Requirements. (1972,
35. Public Law 92–403, as Amended) // United States Code. Title 1.Chapter 2. Section 12b.
36. 8. Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010. Chapter 25. Part 2. Ratification of Treaties.
37. 9. Expression of Consent by States to Be Bound by a Treaty. Analytical Report and Country Reports. Committee of Legal
38. Advisers on Public International Law (CAHDI). Council of Europe. CAHDI (2001) 3. Strasbourg, 23 January 2001.
39. 10. Garcia M., R. Chuck Mason. Congressional Oversight and Related Issues Concerning International Security
40. Agreements Concluded by the United States // Congressional Research Service. June 2, 2009.
41. 11. Grimmett J. Why Certain Trade Agreements Are Approved as Congressional–Executive Agreements Rather Than
42. Treaties // Congressional Research Service. January 19, 2011.
43. 12. The Governance of Britain. War Powers and Treaties: Limiting Executive Powers. October 2007.
44. 13. Harrington J. Canadian Treaty Practice and the Disabilities Convention // Housei Riron. 2010. Vol. 42. ¹ 3–4.
45. 14. Harrington J. Redressing the Democratic Deficit in Treaty Law Making:
46. (Re–)Establishing a Role for Parliament // McGill Law Journal. 2005. Vol. 50.
47. 15. Hathaway O. Presidential Power over International Law: Restoring the Balance // The Yale Law Journal. 2009. Vol. 119.
48. 16. Kingdom Act on the Approval and Publication of Treaties. August 20, 1994. [Translation by the Dutch Ministry of
49. Foreign Affairs]. In:Brouwer J.G. Treaty Law and Practice in the Netherlands. Groningen, April 2002. Annex C.
50. 17. De Mestral A. & Fox–Decent E. Rethinking the Relationship Between International and Domestic Law // McGill
51. Law Journal. 2008. Vol. 53.
52. 18. The Ponsonby Rule. Foreign and Commonwealth Office. November 2010 // http://fco.gov.uk/resources/en/pdf/
53. TrPonsonbyRule.
54. 19. Review of the Treaty–Making Process. Commonwealth of Australia. August 1999.
55. 20. The Lord Templeman. Treaty–Making and the British Parliament // Chicago–Kent Law Review. 1991. Vol. 67.
56. 21. Thorp A. Parliamentary Scrutiny of Treaties: Up to 2010. House of Commons Library. 25 September 2009.
57. 22. Treaties and Other International Agreements: The Role of the United States Senate. A Study Prepared for the
58. Committee on Foreign Relations. United States Senate. January 2001.
59. 23. Wright L. Trade Promotion Authority: Fast Track for the Twenty–First Century // William & Mary Bill of Rights
60. Journal. 2004. Vol. 12.
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.