|
Library
|
Your profile |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|
Administrative and municipal law
Reference:
Bykov, V. M.
Law on House Arrest of the Suspect or Accused: Scientific Commentary
// Administrative and municipal law.
2012. ¹ 3.
P. 14-20.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=59338
Bykov, V. M. Law on House Arrest of the Suspect or Accused: Scientific CommentaryAbstract: The article is devoted to a new federal law concerning house arrest. The author notes that this new law regulates the use of house arrest as a measure of suppression in more detail. At the same time, the current version of the law still has certain debatable provisions. The author of the article suggests ways of improvement of this new law. According to the author, there should be a new version of the law. Keywords: measure of suppression, house arrest, court, arrest duration, bail, prohibitions and restrictions, court decision, control, police, defender.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here . References
1. Bagautdinov F. Novaya mera presecheniya po UPK RF — domashniy arest // Zakonnost'. — 2002. — ¹ 10. — S. 14-16.
2. Bykov V.M., Liskov D.A. Domashniy arest kak novaya mera presecheniya po UPK RF // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. — 2004. — ¹ 4. — S. 12-14. 3. Bykov V. Novyy zakon o zaloge kak mere presecheniya // Zakonnost'. — 2010. — ¹ 9. — S. 26-30. 4. Dzhuzhoma V.V. «Kontroliruemaya svoboda» — domashniy arest s ispol'zovaniem elektronnykh sredstv na-blyudeniya i kontrolya za osuzhdennym: al'ternativnoe ugolovnoe nakazanie ili ocherednoy primer neudach-nogo zaimstvovaniya inostrannogo opyta? // Vestnik rossiyskoy pravovoy akademii. — 2009. — ¹ 1. — S. 64-67. 5. Kalinkin S. Primenenie sudami mer presecheniya v vide zaklyucheniya pod strazhu, zaloga i domashnego aresta // Ugolovnoe pravo. — 2010. — ¹ 2. 6. Karetnikov A.S., Arzamastseva K.A. Yavlyaetsya li deyatel'nost'suda po rassmotreniyu i razresheniyu khodataystv dolzhnostnykh lits organov predvaritel'nogo sledstviya sudebnym kontrolem? // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. — 2010. — ¹ 4. — S. 68. 7. Kolokolov N.A. Zalog, domashniy arest: stanovlenie praktiki // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. — 2011. — ¹ 11. (Stat'ya 2). 8. Mel'nikov V.Yu. Problemy primeneniya domashnego aresta kaak mery presecheniya // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. — 2007. — ¹ 3. — S. 72. 9. Ovchinnikov Yu.G., Zagvozdkin N.N. Osnovaniya dlya izbraniya mery presecheniya v vide domashnego aresta v ugolovnom protsesse Rossii. // Sledovatel'. — 2004. — ¹ 1. — S. 14-21. 10. Rossiyskaya gazeta. — 2011. — 8 fevralya. 11. Rossiyskaya gazeta. — 2011. — 9 dekabrya. 12. Rossiyskaya gazeta. — 2011. — 21 dekabrya. 13. Saltykov E.V. Otmena ili izmenenie mery presecheniya v vide domashnego aresta // Vestnik rossiyskoy pra-vovoy akademii. — 2008. — ¹ 2. — S. 35-37. 14. Solov'ev I.N. Problemnye voprosy ispolneniya domashnego aresta // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. — 2010. — ¹ 13. 15. Sterkhov P., Sterkhova I. Sudebnyy kontrol'i problemy primeneni domashnego aresta i zaloga v kachestve mer presecheniya // Ugolovnoe pravo. — 2008. — ¹ 3. — S. 79-82 |
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
Eng
