Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law
Reference:

O.S. Skakun Aspects of Correlation between the Convention of October 19, 1996 on Jurisdiction, Applicable Law, Recognition, Enforcement and Co-operation in respect of Parental Responsibility and Measures for the Protection of Children with Russian Legislation

Abstract: The article deals with current ways of solving issues related to the exercise of parental rights at the family disruption which have a foreign element. It assesses the possibility of the settlement of such situations through accession to multilateral treaties, in particular, to the Hague Convention of October 19, 1996. The article provides an analysis of the Convention for the compliance with Russian law. In the conclusion it estimates the suitability of the accession and potential issues which might arise on the implementation of its provisions.

Keywords:

Hague Convention of 1996, family law, relationship between parents and children, protection of the rights of child, parental rights, parental responsibility, best interests of the child, child’s habitual residence, custody, international child abduction.

This article is unavailable for unregistered users. Click to login or register

References
1. Ansel' Zh.P., Abassi M. Ispolnenie inostrannykh sudebnykh resheniy // «Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava». M., 2006. ¹ 8. S. 23-46
2. Antokol'skaya M. Semeynoe pravo: Ucheb. 3-e izd., pererab. i dop. M., 2004. 688 s.
3. Boguslavskiy M.M. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo: Uchebnik. 5-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Yurist', 2005. 606 s.
4. Gerasimov V.N. Prava i obyazannosti roditeley: sravnitel'noe issledovanie zakonodatel'stva stran Evro-peyskogo soyuza // Semeynoe i zhilishchnoe pravo. 2010. ¹ 6. S. 29-31
5. Grishaev S.P. Semeynye pravootnosheniya s uchastiem inostrannykh grazhdan // SPS “Konsul'tantPlyus”. 2009.
6. Gureev V.A. Priznanie i prinuditel'noe ispolnenie inostrannykh sudebnykh resheniy: rossiyskoe zakono-datel'stvo i evropeyskiy opyt // Sovremennoe pravo. 2010. ¹ 4. S. 132-140.
7. Kuznetsova O.V., Slobtsov I.A. Spory o detyakh: opredelenie mesta zhitel'stva rebenka i poryadka ego obshcheniya s roditelyami // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. 2009.
8. Lukashuk I.I. Normy mezhdunarodnogo prava. M., 1994.
9. Makovskiy A.L. O kodifikatsii grazhdanskogo prava (1922-2006). M.: Statut, 2010.
10. Marysheva N.I. Semeynye otnosheniya s uchastiem inostrantsev: pravovoe regulirovanie v Rossii. M.: Vol-ters Kluver, 2007.
11. Mezhdunarodnoe sotrudnichestvo v oblasti priznaniya i ispolneniya inostrannykh sudebnykh resheniy // «Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava». 2006. ¹ 8. S. 4-6.
12. Nechaeva A.M. Pravonarusheniya v sfere lichnykh semeynykh otnosheniy. M., 2007.
13. Rafalyuk E.E. Unifikatsiya mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava v stranakh Latinskoy Ameriki: istoriya i sovre-mennost' // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2010. ¹ 5. S. 88-98.
14. Fedoseeva G.Yu. Printsip naibolee tesnoy svyazi i printsip naibolee blagopriyatnogo prava primenitel'no k regulirovaniyu transgranichnykh brachno-semeynykh otnosheniy // Lex Russica. Nauchnye trudy MGYuA. 2006. ¹ 1.
15. Khazova O.A. Mezhdunarodnoe pokhishchenie detey: pravovye aspekty // «Zakon». 2010. ¹ 1. C. 65-70.
16. Rapport explicatif sur la Convention-Protection des enfants de 1996 de Paul Lagarde, Actes et documents de la Dixhuitième session (1996), t. II, Protection des enfants.
17. Rapport explicatif sur la Convention-Protection des mineurs de 1961 de W. de Steiger, Actes et documents de la neuvième session (1960), tome IV, Protection des mineurs
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.