Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Kalinin, E.A. On the issue of ideological bases of the principles of international economic law and Russia as legally competent participant of international relations.

Abstract: The fi ght of developed states for resources and global fl ows, which is established in the international economic law, is a factor which makes the participants at the international arena to form such systems, in which protection of their geopolitical interests would be most effi cient and unconstrained. In this case international economic law serves as one of the means of guaranteeing such interest, together with the ideological concepts of free market, transparent borders and market economy as a whole (analogous to democracy and protection of human rights in the political sphere). The instruments of the global market, and as a consequence, of international economic law establish the fast development of globalism, which in turn makes counter-actions by certain states unreasonable. In such a situation a market, which serves the interests of developed states dictates a common state (inner, foreign, legal, social, etc.) policy for all other states. Due to all this, it is topical for the Russian Federation to form its foreign policy in order to provide the world with more fair architecture of global formation, including its economic sphere.


Keywords:

jurisprudence, globalization, globalism, international economic law, international law, global management, sovereignty, developed states, ideology, transnational corporations.


This article is unavailable for unregistered users. Click to login or register

References
1. Bekyashev K.A. Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe pravo. Uchebnik. / Pod red. K.A. Bekyasheva. M. Prospekt. 1998.
2. Bell D. Gryadushchee postindustrial'noe obshchestvo. Opyt sotsial'nogo prognozirovaniya / Per. s angl. Izd. 2-e, ispr. i dop. M.: Academia. 2004.
3. Boguslavskiy M.M.. Mezhdunarodnoe ekonomicheskoe pravo. M. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 1986.
4. Vasil'ev A. Afrika v menyayushchemsya mire // Aziya i Afrika segodnya. 1998. ¹9.
5. Vyzov natsional'nomu suverenitetu. http://ecgb.ru/vyzov-nacionalnomu-suverenitetu.html.
6. Vysotskaya N. Grimasy liberalizatsii // Aziya i Afrika segodnya. 1998. ¹8.
7. Globalizatsiya ekonomiki, regional'naya integratsiya, vliyanie etikh protsessov na polozhenie trudyashchikhsya gosu-darstv-uchastnikov SNG. Trudy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. M.: Profizdat, 2002.
8. Doklad OON «O razvitii cheloveka za 1999 god». N'yu-York, Oksford: Oksford yuniversiti press, 1999.
9. Kalamkaryan R.A. Kontseptsiya gospodstva prava v sovremennom mezhdunarodnom prave // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2003. ¹6.
10. Konovalov V.N. Rossiyskiy suverenitet v usloviyakh globalizatsii. M.: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2003.
11. Korell Kh. Na puti k gospodstvu prava v mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh // Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe i chastnoe pravo. 2001. ¹3.
12. Korochantsev V. Kak Klinton Afriku pokoryal // Aziya i Afrika segodnya. 1998. ¹7.
13. Kochetov E.G. Osnovnye kharakteristiki globalizatsionnykh protsessov i pravovoe izmerenie mira // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2003. ¹3.
14. Lukashuk I.I. Mirovoy poryadok XXI veka // Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe i chastnoe pravo. 2002. ¹1.
15. Medouz D., Randers Y. Predely rosta. 30 let spustya. M.: Akademkniga. 2008.
16. Ofitsial'nye otchety General'noy Assamblei, pyat'desyat devyataya sessiya, Dopolnenie ¹33 (A/59/33), p. 70; dopolnitel'nyy peresmotrennyy dokument: A/AC.182/L.114/Rev.2.
17. Purtov. A.S. AR P889. Printsip vzaimnoy vygody v mezhdunarodnom ekonomicheskom prave: Avtoreferat dis-sertatsii na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kandidata yuridicheskikh nauk. Spetsial'nost' 12.00.10.-Mezhdunarodnoe pravo; Evropeyskoe pravo / A.S. Purtov; Nauch. ruk. V.M. Shumilov.-M., 2010.-22 s.
18. Purtov. A.S. Printsip vzaimnoy vygody v mezhdunarodnykh ekonomicheskikh otnosheniyakh // Rossiyskiy vneshne-ekonomicheskiy vestnik Iyul' 2008 g.
19. Rogozhin S.L. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo kak dialog i stolknovenie tsivilizatsiy // Moskovskiy zhurnal mezhdu-narodnogo prava. 2002. ¹3.
20. Ustav Organizatsii Ob'edinennykh Natsiy
21. Federal'nyy zakon ot 08.12.2003 g. ¹164-FZ «Ob osnovakh gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniya vneshnetorgovoy deyatel'nosti» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 15.12.2003. ¹50, st. 4850.
22. Cheshkov M.A. Global'nyy kontekst postsovetskoy Rossii. M. 1999.
23. Shumilov V.M. Kratkaya istoriya mezhdunarodnogo prava.
24. Shumilov V.M. Mezhdunarodnoe ekonomicheskoe pravo: Uchebnik. Rostov-na-Donu. 2003.
25. Boggs C. Economic globalization and political atrophy // Democracy & Nature. 2001. Vol.7. ¹. 2.
26. Buys C. United States Economic Sanctions // Boston University International Law Journal. 1999. ¹2.
27. Giuliani R. Toward a Realistic Peace // Foreign Affairs. 2007. Vol. 86. ¹5. September/October
28. Hufbauer G., Schott J., Elliott K. Economic Sanctions Reconsidered: History and Current Policy. Wash. 1990.
29. Jan Tinbergen. RIO: Reshaping the International Order: A Report to the Club of Rome (1976). ISBN 0-525-04340-3.
30. Jayasuria K. Globalization, sovereignty, and the rule of law: from political to economical constutionalism? // Constellations. 2001. Vol. 8, ¹4.
31. McCain J. An Enduring Peace Built on Freedom // Foreign Affairs. 2007. Vol. 86. ¹6. November/December; High Security and Opportunity for the Twenty-fi rst Century // Ibid.
32. McCausland J.D., Stuart D.T. (ed.) U.S.-UK Relations at the Start Of the 21 Century.-W. D.C. SSI. 2006.
33. Mesarovic M., Pestel E. Mankind at the Turning Point. The Second Report to the Club of Rome. New-York. E.P. Dutton and Co. Inc. 1974.
34. Muckubin T.O. A Balanced Force Structure to Achieve a Liberal World Order // Orbis. 2006. Vol. 50, ¹2.
35. Niblet R. Choosing Between America and Europe: a New Context for British Foreign Policy // International Affairs. 2007. Vol. 83. ¹4.
36. P. de Senarclens. La politiqoe intemationale. Paris. 1992.
37. Pollitt C. Managerialism and the Public Service: the Anglo-American experience. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell. 1990.
38. S/RES/665 (1990). 25 August 1990.
39. Schwartz Th., Skinner K. The Myth of Democratic Peace // Orbis. 2002. Vol. 46. ¹1