Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Psychology and Psychotechnics
Reference:

Dodonov, Yu. S. Analysis of Personal Parameters of Quantity Recognition Time and Their Relations to Speed and Intellect

Abstract: The article is devoted to simple cognitive tasks with growing complexity as a special type of cognitive tasks for speed. As an example, the author analyzes the task of quantity recognition; it is demonstrated that in this task the response time increases when the number of represented stimulus rises. The author describes a possible scheme of analyzing the response time which would allow to take into account personal differences in the patterns of increasing recognition time when the number of represented stimulus is risen. The obtained personal parameters are analyzed from the point of view of their relation with the parameters of speed and intellect.

Keywords:

psychology, intellect, personal differences, experiment, information processing time, response time, geometric average time, standard deviation of times, simple cognitive tasks.

This article is unavailable for unregistered users. Click to login or register

References
1. Dodonov Yu.S. Obshchiy intellekt i skorost' opoznavaniya kolichestva [Elektronnyy resurs] // Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya: elektron. nauchn. zhurn. 2011. ¹ 2 (16). URL: http://psystudy.ru.
2. Akin O., & Chase W. Quantification of three-dimensional structures // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1978. Vol. 4 (3). P. 397-410.
3. Beauducel A., Brocke B. Intelligence and speed of information processing: further results and questions on Hick’s paradigm and beyond // Personality and Individual Differences. 1993. Vol. 15 (6). P. 627-636.
4. Detterman D.K. What does reaction time tell us about intelligence? / In P. A. Vernon (Ed.) Speed of information processing and intelligence. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 1987. P. 177-200.
5. Donders F.C. On the speed of mental processes // Acta Psychologica. 1969. Vol. 30. P. 412-431. (Original work published in 1869).
6. Eysenck H.J. Speed of information processing, reaction time, and the theory of intelligence / In P.A.Vernon (Ed.) Speed of information-processing and intelligence. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 1987. P. 21-67.
7. Hick W.E. On the rate of gain of information // The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1952. Vol. 4 (1). P. 11-26.
8. Jensen A.R. Why is reaction time correlated with psychometric g? // Current Directions in Psychological Science. 1993. Vol. 2 (2). P. 53-56.
9. Jensen A. The g factor. London: Praeger, 1998(a).
10. Jensen A. The suppressed relationship between IQ and the reaction time slope parameter of the Hick function // Intelligence. 1998(b). Vol. 26 (1). P. 43-52.
11. Jensen E., Reese E., & Reese T. The subitizing and counting of visually presented fields of dots // Journal of Psychology. 1950. Vol. 30. P. 363-392.
12. Mandler G., & Shebo B.J. Subitizing: An analysis of its component processes // Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 1982. Vol. 111 (1). P. 1-21.
13. McKenna F.P. Measures of field dependence: Cognitive style or cognitive ability? // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1984. Vol. 47 (3). P. 593-660.
14. Neubauer A.C., Riemann R., Mayer R., Angleitner A. Intelligence and reaction times in the Hick, Sternberg and Posner paradigms // Personality and Individual Differences. 1997. Vol. 22 (6). P. 885-894.
15. Posner M.I., Mitchell R.F. Chronometric analysis of classification // Psychological Review. 1967. Vol. 74 (5). P. 392-409.
16. Rammsayer T.H., Brandler S. Performance on temporal information processing as an index of general intelligence // Intelligence. 2007. Vol. 35 (2). P. 123-139.
17. Roth E. Die Geschwinddigkeit der Verabeitung von Information und ihr Zusammenhang mit Intelligenz // Zeitschrift fuer Expermintelle und Angewandte Psychologie. 1964. Vol. 11. P. 616-622.
18. Shannon C.E. A mathematical theory of communication // The Bell System Technical Journal. 1948. Vol. 27. pp. 379–423, 623–656.
19. Shepard R.N. Metzler, J. Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects // Science. 1971. Vol. 171(3972). P. 701-703.
20. Sternberg, S. High speed scanning in human memory // Science. 1966. Vol. 153 (3736). P. 652-654.
21. Trick L., & Pylyshyn Z. Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limitedcapacity preattentive stage in vision // Psychological Review. 1994. Vol. 101 (1). P. 80-102.
22. Weisz J.R., O’Neill P., O’Neill P.C. Field dependence-independence on the Children’s Embedded Figures Test: Cognitive style or cognitive level? // Developmental Psychology. 1975. Vol. 11 (4). P. 539-540.
23. Widiger T.A., Knudson R.M., Rorer L.G. Convergent and discriminant validity of measures of cognitive styles and abilities // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1980. Vol. 39 (1). P. 116-129
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.