|
Library
|
Your profile |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:
Borisov, S. V.
‘Philosopher’s Eye’ For Science: Dialogue In Dialogue Mode.
// Philosophy and Culture.
2011. ¹ 1.
P. 81-91.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=57970
Borisov, S. V. ‘Philosopher’s Eye’ For Science: Dialogue In Dialogue Mode.Abstract: The author of the article makes an attempt to transform the ‘inner’ polemics on science as learning activity into the ‘external’ in the form of an imagined dialogue between the Dunce, Scientist and Science Philosophers. Based on the author, it will allow to reveal certain contradictions and dramatic moments of development of science and to see the ‘inner side’ of it. Keywords: philosophy, science, epistemology, positivism, neopositivism, post-positivism, paradigm, methodology, verifi cation, falsifi cation
This article is unavailable for unregistered users.
Click to login or register
References
1. Antologiya mirovoy filosofii: V 4 t. T. 3. M., 1971.
2. Vindel'band V. Izbrannoe. Dukh i istoriya. M., 1995. 3. Gadamer Kh.-G. Istina i metod: Osnovy filosofskoy germenevtiki. M., 1988. 4. Dil'tey V. Vvedenie v nauki o dukhe. M., 2000. 5. Kant I. Osnovanie metafiziki nravov // Kant I. Soch. : V 6 t. T. 4. Ch. 1. M., 1965. 6. Karnap R. Preodolenie metafiziki logicheskim analizom yazyka // Put' v filosofiyu. 7. Antologiya. M.; SPb, 2001. 8. Kun T. Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsiy. M., 1975. 9. Lakatos I. Fal'sifikatsiya i metodologiya nauchno-issledovatel'skikh programm // Kun T. 10. Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsiy. M., 2003. 11. Popper K. Logika i rost nauchnogo znaniya. M., 1983. 12. Rassel B. Problemy filosofii. M., 2000. 13. Reale D., Antiseri D. Zapadnaya filosofiya ot istokov do nashikh dney: V 4 t. T. 4. SPb, 1997. 14. Feyerabend P. Protiv metoda. Ocherk anarkhistskoy teorii poznaniya. M., 2007. |
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
Eng
