Published in journal "Philosophy and Culture", 2010-3 , pages 81-89.
Resume: The author discussed grounds for the hypothesis that many concepts of language in Russian philosophy appeared as a result of a sharp and still on-going crisis of language making us doubt the possibility of an adequate understanding of words. These conceptions differ in concrete principles of text formation but have the same strategy of overcoming the language crisis. In comparison to Bakhtin’s, Florensky’s and Schpet’s theories of language, the author described A. Losev’s theory of ‘positional polytropia’ as a core principle of text formation. According to the author, Losev’s theory was made to provide adequateness and wholeness of communication.
Keywords: language crisis, principles of text formation, polyphony, polyrolism, polycyclia, polytropia, multi-layered, multi-vectored
Losev A. F. Filosofiya imeni. M. 1927.
Losev A. F. Dialektika mifa. M., 1930
Losev A. F. Vvedenie v obshchuyu teoriyu yazykovykh modeley. M., 1968
Losev A. F. Problema simvola i realisticheskoe iskusstvo. M., 1976.
Bakhtin M.M. Problemy poetiki Dostoevskogo. M., 1963.
Florenskiy P. U vodorazdelov mysli // Florenskiy P.A. Sochineniya. T.2. M., 1990.
Shpet G. Vnutrennyaya forma slova // Shpet G. Iskusstvo kak vid znaniya. Izbrannye trudy po filosofii kul'tury. M., 2007.
Correct link to this article:
just copy this link to clipboard