Review: This article explores the peculiarities and internal contradictions of the U. S. political theory, as well as its ability to form national ideology and feed the national idea of American people at the present stage. The U. S. political theory was initially developing as a special chapter of the American political science, called to establish both, the effectiveness of American political science, as well as the American political system. The author determines and formulates the systemic limitations imposed by the imitation of the American political theory by the natural science disciplines and following the idea of “American exclusivity”. Declaring the freedom from values in the research, the U. S. political theory is in fact closely tied to the values of liberalism. This unique dogmatism in combination with rejection of criticism makes the American political theory similar to the Communist teachings, and resembles its ideology. It is also justified by the fact that the American Political Science Association does not really tolerate dissent in its ranks, as substantiated by the actual American political scientists. In the end, the contradictions accumulated in the area of political theory impede the truly objective political research and development of political science in the United States.

Keywords: Security, Values, Political history, State, Diplomacy, Ideology, Political theory, United States, Society, Policy

References:
Spiridonov V.V. Finansovo-ekonomicheskie prichiny politicheskogo krizisa na Ukraine. Vzglyad cherez prizmu analiza bankovskoy sistemy strany // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2014. - 3. - C. 398 - 405. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.3.11740.
Fel'dman P.Ya. Geopoliticheskiy klientelizm v mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh: strategiya i taktika Zapada. // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2014. - 2. - C. 189 - 193. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.2.11365.
Lasariya A.O. Osobennosti etnopoliticheskikh konfliktov na postsovetskom prostranstve // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2015. - 1. - C. 75 - 77. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2015.1.13507.
Karyakin V.V. Tsivilizatsionnaya antropologiya amerikanskogo ekspansionizma:
ot doktriny Monro k global'nomu liderstvu // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 487 - 468. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.4.9722.
Karpovich O.G. Ideologicheskaya baza separatizma v sisteme koordinat sovremennoy mirovoy politiki // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2014. - 11. - C. 1339 - 1352. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.11.12959.
Manoylo A.V. Politicheskie konflikty v mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh i mirovoy politike. //Mir i Politika. 2013. №2. S. 71-82.
Manoylo A.V. Siriyskiy tupik «Arabskoy vesny». // Vestn. Mosk. Un-ta. Ser. 12. Politicheskie nauki. 2013. №6. S. 49-56.
Bocharnikov I.V. O gosudarstvennoy ideologii Rossii // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2013.-1.-C. 22-27. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.01.3.
Pavlov A.V., Leo Shtraus: iskusstvo pisat' i iskusstvo chitat' // Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie. 2012. T. 3. № 3. S. 4-11.
Pavlov A.V., Pragmatichnye nasledniki politicheskoy filosofii Leo Shtrausa // Istoriya filosofii. 2008. № 13. S. 98-109;
Frisch, M.J., Leo Strauss and the American Regime // Publius, Vol. 17, No. 2 (Spring, 1987), pp. 1-5; Smith S.B., Leo Strauss's Platonic Liberalism // Political Theory Vol. 28, No. 6 (Dec., 2000), pp. 787-809;
Barber, B.R. The Politics of Political Science: “Value-free” Theory and the Wolin–Strauss Dust-Up of 1963 // American Political Science Review, November 2006, Vol. 100, No. 4, 539-545;
Altman, W.H.F., The Hindenburg Line of the Strauss Wars // Philosophy of the Social Sciences March 2010 Vol. 40, № 1, pp. 118-153;
Chacon, R. Reading Strauss from the Start : On the Heideggerian Origins of 'Political Philosophy' // European Journal of Political Theory 2010 Vol. 9, 287-307
Bernshteyn E. Izdatel'stvo Burevestnik, Odessa, 1906 g. Str. 27-28
Posusney, M.P. Democracy versus Diversity – a False Dichotomy // Perestroika! The raucous rebellion in political science Edited by Kristen Renwick Monroe, Yale University Press, 2005, p. 250-259;
Almond G. Separate Tables: Schools and Sects in Political Science // PS: Political Science and Politics, Vol. 21, No. 4 (Autumn, 1988), p. 840;
Ross D. The origins of American Social Science, Cambridge, 1991, p. 28;
Huntington S.P., One Soup at a Time: Political Science and Political Reform // American Political Science Review, vol. 82, № 2, March 1988 pp. 6-7;
Anderson L., Items and Issues, Social Science Research Council, Vol. I, № III-IV, Fall 2000, p. 8
Barrow, C.W. The Intellectual Origins of New Political Science // New political science, Vol. 30, Issue 2, 2008.
The Idea // Perestroika! The raucous rebellion in political science Edited by Kristen Renwick Monroe, Yale University Press, 2005, p. 9;
Haddow A. Political science in American colleges and universities 1636-1900, Octagon Books, N.Y., 1969, p. 212;
D. Ross, The origins of American Social Science, Cambridge, 1991, p.76;
Ross D. The origins of American Social Science, Cambridge, 1991, p.48;
Haddow A. Political science in American colleges and universities 1636-1900, Octagon Books, N.Y., 1969, p. 236;
Sailsbury, R., Current Criticism of APSA is Nothing New // PS: Political Science and Politics, 34 (December 2001) 767-772;
Warren D.T., Will the real perestroikniks please stand up? // Perestroika! The raucous rebellion in political science Edited by Kristen Renwick Monroe, Yale University Press, 2005, p. 219;
Easton, D. The New Revolution In Political Science // American Political Science Review, December 1969;

References (transliteration):
Spiridonov V.V. Finansovo-ekonomicheskie prichiny politicheskogo krizisa na Ukraine. Vzglyad cherez prizmu analiza bankovskoy sistemy strany // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2014. - 3. - C. 398 - 405. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.3.11740.
Fel'dman P.Ya. Geopoliticheskiy klientelizm v mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh: strategiya i taktika Zapada. // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2014. - 2. - C. 189 - 193. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.2.11365.
Lasariya A.O. Osobennosti etnopoliticheskikh konfliktov na postsovetskom prostranstve // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2015. - 1. - C. 75 - 77. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2015.1.13507.
Karyakin V.V. Tsivilizatsionnaya antropologiya amerikanskogo ekspansionizma:
ot doktriny Monro k global'nomu liderstvu // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 487 - 468. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.4.9722.
Karpovich O.G. Ideologicheskaya baza separatizma v sisteme koordinat sovremennoy mirovoy politiki // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2014. - 11. - C. 1339 - 1352. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.11.12959.
Manoylo A.V. Politicheskie konflikty v mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh i mirovoy politike. //Mir i Politika. 2013. №2. S. 71-82.
Manoylo A.V. Siriyskiy tupik «Arabskoy vesny». // Vestn. Mosk. Un-ta. Ser. 12. Politicheskie nauki. 2013. №6. S. 49-56.
Bocharnikov I.V. O gosudarstvennoy ideologii Rossii // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2013.-1.-C. 22-27. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.01.3.
Pavlov A.V., Leo Shtraus: iskusstvo pisat' i iskusstvo chitat' // Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie. 2012. T. 3. № 3. S. 4-11.
Pavlov A.V., Pragmatichnye nasledniki politicheskoy filosofii Leo Shtrausa // Istoriya filosofii. 2008. № 13. S. 98-109;
Frisch, M.J., Leo Strauss and the American Regime // Publius, Vol. 17, No. 2 (Spring, 1987), pp. 1-5; Smith S.B., Leo Strauss's Platonic Liberalism // Political Theory Vol. 28, No. 6 (Dec., 2000), pp. 787-809;
Barber, B.R. The Politics of Political Science: “Value-free” Theory and the Wolin–Strauss Dust-Up of 1963 // American Political Science Review, November 2006, Vol. 100, No. 4, 539-545;
Altman, W.H.F., The Hindenburg Line of the Strauss Wars // Philosophy of the Social Sciences March 2010 Vol. 40, № 1, pp. 118-153;
Chacon, R. Reading Strauss from the Start : On the Heideggerian Origins of 'Political Philosophy' // European Journal of Political Theory 2010 Vol. 9, 287-307
Bernshteyn E. Izdatel'stvo Burevestnik, Odessa, 1906 g. Str. 27-28
Posusney, M.P. Democracy versus Diversity – a False Dichotomy // Perestroika! The raucous rebellion in political science Edited by Kristen Renwick Monroe, Yale University Press, 2005, p. 250-259;
Almond G. Separate Tables: Schools and Sects in Political Science // PS: Political Science and Politics, Vol. 21, No. 4 (Autumn, 1988), p. 840;
Ross D. The origins of American Social Science, Cambridge, 1991, p. 28;
Huntington S.P., One Soup at a Time: Political Science and Political Reform // American Political Science Review, vol. 82, № 2, March 1988 pp. 6-7;
Anderson L., Items and Issues, Social Science Research Council, Vol. I, № III-IV, Fall 2000, p. 8
Barrow, C.W. The Intellectual Origins of New Political Science // New political science, Vol. 30, Issue 2, 2008.
The Idea // Perestroika! The raucous rebellion in political science Edited by Kristen Renwick Monroe, Yale University Press, 2005, p. 9;
Haddow A. Political science in American colleges and universities 1636-1900, Octagon Books, N.Y., 1969, p. 212;
D. Ross, The origins of American Social Science, Cambridge, 1991, p.76;
Ross D. The origins of American Social Science, Cambridge, 1991, p.48;
Haddow A. Political science in American colleges and universities 1636-1900, Octagon Books, N.Y., 1969, p. 236;
Sailsbury, R., Current Criticism of APSA is Nothing New // PS: Political Science and Politics, 34 (December 2001) 767-772;
Warren D.T., Will the real perestroikniks please stand up? // Perestroika! The raucous rebellion in political science Edited by Kristen Renwick Monroe, Yale University Press, 2005, p. 219;
Easton, D. The New Revolution In Political Science // American Political Science Review, December 1969;

Review: This article presents a comparative analysis of NATO’s political and military activity in Baltic sector countries (Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia), on the background of the developing Ukrainian crisis. The author points out the increase in frequency and intensity of military exercises by NATO countries and its overt anti-Russian vector. The author analyzes NATO leadership’s decisions in implementing the Newport (Wales, Great Britain) Summit’s decisions in additional weapons placement in Baltic countries, and in creating a rapid reaction force. The methodological basis of this research is the systemic, structural-functional, comparative-political, geopolitical and cultural-civilizational approaches, the methods of analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, modeling, observation. The author reaches conclusions regarding NATO’s provocative work to involve neutral Baltic countries into the Alliance – Sweden and Finland. The author points out that the Baltic region, along with Ukraine, one of the major tension points between Russian Federation and NATO.

Keywords: administration, politics, world order, geopolitics, NATO, Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia, Ukrainian crisis, Baltic region.

References:
Manoylo A.V. Natsional'no-gosudarstvennye modeli psikhologicheskogo upravleniya konfliktami. // Obozrevatel'-Observer.-2008.-№2. – S.118-123.
Rep'eva A.M. Natsiestroitel'stvo. Formirovanie i sushchnostnye kharakteristiki (SShA i Rossiya).// NB: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2013. № 2. S. 68-79.
Filippov V.R. Etnicheskiy aspekt preodoleniya sistemnogo krizisa rossiyskogo federalizma // Federalizm. 200. №
S. 33-50.
Danilov A.P. Voennyy aspekt arkticheskoy politiki Rossii. // Voprosy bezopasnosti. - 2013. - 5. - C. 1 - 7. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7543.2013.5.9812. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/nb/article_9812.html
Bocharnikov I.V. Ukrainskiy krizis kak sledstvie politiki ES i NATO po sozdaniyu poyasa strategicheskogo okruzheniya Rossii // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2014. - 3. - C. 436 - 445. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.3.11520.
Borodinov E.N. Analiz normandskoy vstrechi i ee znachenie dlya Rossii // Trendy i upravlenie. - 2014. - 2. - C. 117 - 123. DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2014.2.12409.
Veprintsev V.B. Informatsiya v prostranstvennykh i geopoliticheskikh kategoriyakh // Trendy i upravlenie. - 2014. - 3. - C. 302 - 308. DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2014.3.12620.

References (transliteration):
Manoylo A.V. Natsional'no-gosudarstvennye modeli psikhologicheskogo upravleniya konfliktami. // Obozrevatel'-Observer.-2008.-№2. – S.118-123.
Rep'eva A.M. Natsiestroitel'stvo. Formirovanie i sushchnostnye kharakteristiki (SShA i Rossiya).// NB: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2013. № 2. S. 68-79.
Filippov V.R. Etnicheskiy aspekt preodoleniya sistemnogo krizisa rossiyskogo federalizma // Federalizm. 200. №
S. 33-50.
Danilov A.P. Voennyy aspekt arkticheskoy politiki Rossii. // Voprosy bezopasnosti. - 2013. - 5. - C. 1 - 7. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7543.2013.5.9812. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/nb/article_9812.html
Bocharnikov I.V. Ukrainskiy krizis kak sledstvie politiki ES i NATO po sozdaniyu poyasa strategicheskogo okruzheniya Rossii // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2014. - 3. - C. 436 - 445. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.3.11520.
Borodinov E.N. Analiz normandskoy vstrechi i ee znachenie dlya Rossii // Trendy i upravlenie. - 2014. - 2. - C. 117 - 123. DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2014.2.12409.
Veprintsev V.B. Informatsiya v prostranstvennykh i geopoliticheskikh kategoriyakh // Trendy i upravlenie. - 2014. - 3. - C. 302 - 308. DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2014.3.12620.

Review: Today Brazil applies new information communication technologies in order to spread Brazilian values in the world and in the EU in particular in order to guarantee its leadership. One of the directions of the foreign policy of L.I. Lula da Silva has been widening the scope of relations with the EU states, which could form competition for the US in Brazil and provide information support for Brazil within the development of strategic partnership as a result of information and economic pressure from the US. Methodological basis for the study is formed with the systemic, structural-functional, comparative political and cultural civilization approaches, methods of induction, deduction, analysis, synthesis, modeling, expert evaluation, observation. Information development of Government and Embassy sites of the Federal Republic of Brazil in order to make their work with the foreign audiences in the states and regions of the EU facilitated the development of the bilateral contacts between the two regions ranging from economic and political projects to scientific an cultural cooperation.

Keywords: politics, management, Brazil, EU, USA, soft power, intercultural communication, political communication, reputation, image.

Contact information: Hizrieva, Sabina Sagidguseinovna, 119991, Russia, Moskva, GSP-1, Lomonosovskiy prospect, 27, korp.4.

References:
Balanco de Politica Externa 2003/2010. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://www.itamaraty.gov.br/temas/balanco-de-politica-externa-2003-2010 (29.04.2011).
Country strategy paper 2001-2006 and national indicative programme 2002-2006. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL:http://www.eeas.europa.eu/brazil/csp/02_06_en.pdf (10.03.2013).
THE 1-st EU-BRAZIL (ofitsial'nyy sayt). [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL:http://www.summits.aip.pt/brasil/PT/EU-Brazil.asp (20.03.2013).
Entsiklopediya Latinskaya Amerika. // Pod red. Davydova V.M. – M: Ekonomika, 2013.-S.444
Informatsionnoe agentstvo «Agencia Brasil»-http://agenciabrasil.ebc.com.br/
Informatsionnoe agentstvo «Agencia Estado» [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://www.ae.com.br/ (12.03.2013).
Vinogradova E.A. Informatsionno-kommunikatsionnoe obespechenie politiki stran ALBA v ES v nachale XXI veka. NB: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.№ 2., 2013 — 0.-№ 0.-S.0-0. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4226.0.0.725. 0,8 p.l. http://e-notabene.ru/wi/article_725.html
Manoylo A.V. Natsional'no-gosudarstvennye modeli psikhologicheskogo upravleniya konfliktami. // Obozrevatel'-Observer.-2008.-№2.
Manoylo A.V. «Finikovye revolyutsii»: stikhiya ili upravlyaemyy khaos?//Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn'. – 2011.-№5. – S. 63-78.
Manoylo A.V. Rol' strategiy upravlyaemogo khaosa v formirovanii novogo miroporyadka // Pravo i politika. – 2014. – № 5. – S. 638-651. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.5.11816.
Manoylo A.V. Nesilovoe regulirovanie mezhdunarodnykh konfliktov. Kul'turno-tsivilizatsionnye paradigmy. // Kosmopolis.-2008.-№2. – S.168-174.
Manoylo A.V. Psikhologicheskie operatsii: modeli i tekhnologii upravleniya konfliktami. // Politeks (Politicheskaya ekspertiza).-2008.-№3 .-S. 62-73.
Manoylo A.V. Psikhologicheskie operatsii SShA v Irake. // Kosmopolis.-2008.-№1. – S.124-128.
Manoylo A.V. Modeli informatsionnogo vozdeystviya na razreshenie mezhdunarodnykh i vnutripoliticheskikh konfliktov. // Federalizm.-2008.-№3. – S. 159-172.
Vinogradova E.A. Informatsionno-kommunikatsionnoe obespechenie politiki stran ALBA v ES v nachale XXI veka // NB: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2013. - 1. - C. 1 - 11. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4226.2013.1.725. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_725.html
A.Yu. Bel'yaninov Vykhod iz integratsionnogo krizisa
cherez povyshenie effektivnosti
deyatel'nosti SNG // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2013. - 2. - C. 176 - 182. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.02.7.
Filimonov G.Yu. Aktual'nye voprosy
formirovaniya strategii «myagkoy sily»
vo vneshney politike
Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 443 - 451. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.4.9419.
Martynov A.V. Sovremennoe pravo i publichnoe upravlenie: problemy metodologii i sootnosheniya // NB: Ekonomika, trendy i upravlenie. - 2013. - 4. - C. 1 - 15. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4595.2013.4.924. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/etc/article_924.html
Aleynikov A.V. Sistemnye konflikty v Rossii: kontseptual'nye osnovaniya analiza. Stat'ya 1. // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki. - 2013. - 7. - C. 94 - 140. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2013.7.2306. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_2306.html
Khizrieva S.S. Informatsionnoe obespechenie
vneshney politiki Brazilii
v Evrosoyuze // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2013. - 3. - C. 353 - 355. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.3.8879.
Budaev A.V. Publichnaya diplomatiya v rossiysko-brazil'skikh otnosheniyakh // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2014. - 2. - C. 197 - 205. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.2.10164.
Chikharev I.A., Stoletov O.V. Universitety kak sub'ekty
publichnoy diplomatii // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 519 - 529. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.4.9752.
G. Yu. Filimonov, S. A. Tsaturyan Sotsial'nye seti kak innovatsionnyy mekhanizm
«myagkogo» vozdeystviya i upravleniya
massovym soznaniem // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2012. - 1. - C. 65 - 75.
Korobeynikov A.G., Grishentsev A.Yu., Svyatkina M.N. Primenenie intellektual'nykh agentov magnitnykh izmereniy dlya monitoringa ob'ektov zheleznodorozhnoy infrastruktury // NB: Kibernetika i programmirovanie. - 2013. - 3. - C. 9 - 20. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4196.2013.3.8737. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/kp/article_8737.html

References (transliteration):
Balanco de Politica Externa 2003/2010. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://www.itamaraty.gov.br/temas/balanco-de-politica-externa-2003-2010 (29.04.2011).
Country strategy paper 2001-2006 and national indicative programme 2002-2006. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL:http://www.eeas.europa.eu/brazil/csp/02_06_en.pdf (10.03.2013).
THE 1-st EU-BRAZIL (ofitsial'nyy sayt). [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL:http://www.summits.aip.pt/brasil/PT/EU-Brazil.asp (20.03.2013).
Entsiklopediya Latinskaya Amerika. // Pod red. Davydova V.M. – M: Ekonomika, 2013.-S.444
Informatsionnoe agentstvo «Agencia Brasil»-http://agenciabrasil.ebc.com.br/
Informatsionnoe agentstvo «Agencia Estado» [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://www.ae.com.br/ (12.03.2013).
Vinogradova E.A. Informatsionno-kommunikatsionnoe obespechenie politiki stran ALBA v ES v nachale XXI veka. NB: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.№ 2., 2013 — 0.-№ 0.-S.0-0. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4226.0.0.725. 0,8 p.l. http://e-notabene.ru/wi/article_725.html
Manoylo A.V. Natsional'no-gosudarstvennye modeli psikhologicheskogo upravleniya konfliktami. // Obozrevatel'-Observer.-2008.-№2.
Manoylo A.V. «Finikovye revolyutsii»: stikhiya ili upravlyaemyy khaos?//Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn'. – 2011.-№5. – S. 63-78.
Manoylo A.V. Rol' strategiy upravlyaemogo khaosa v formirovanii novogo miroporyadka // Pravo i politika. – 2014. – № 5. – S. 638-651. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.5.11816.
Manoylo A.V. Nesilovoe regulirovanie mezhdunarodnykh konfliktov. Kul'turno-tsivilizatsionnye paradigmy. // Kosmopolis.-2008.-№2. – S.168-174.
Manoylo A.V. Psikhologicheskie operatsii: modeli i tekhnologii upravleniya konfliktami. // Politeks (Politicheskaya ekspertiza).-2008.-№3 .-S. 62-73.
Manoylo A.V. Psikhologicheskie operatsii SShA v Irake. // Kosmopolis.-2008.-№1. – S.124-128.
Manoylo A.V. Modeli informatsionnogo vozdeystviya na razreshenie mezhdunarodnykh i vnutripoliticheskikh konfliktov. // Federalizm.-2008.-№3. – S. 159-172.
Vinogradova E.A. Informatsionno-kommunikatsionnoe obespechenie politiki stran ALBA v ES v nachale XXI veka // NB: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2013. - 1. - C. 1 - 11. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4226.2013.1.725. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_725.html
A.Yu. Bel'yaninov Vykhod iz integratsionnogo krizisa
cherez povyshenie effektivnosti
deyatel'nosti SNG // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2013. - 2. - C. 176 - 182. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.02.7.
Filimonov G.Yu. Aktual'nye voprosy
formirovaniya strategii «myagkoy sily»
vo vneshney politike
Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 443 - 451. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.4.9419.
Martynov A.V. Sovremennoe pravo i publichnoe upravlenie: problemy metodologii i sootnosheniya // NB: Ekonomika, trendy i upravlenie. - 2013. - 4. - C. 1 - 15. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4595.2013.4.924. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/etc/article_924.html
Aleynikov A.V. Sistemnye konflikty v Rossii: kontseptual'nye osnovaniya analiza. Stat'ya 1. // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki. - 2013. - 7. - C. 94 - 140. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2013.7.2306. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_2306.html
Khizrieva S.S. Informatsionnoe obespechenie
vneshney politiki Brazilii
v Evrosoyuze // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2013. - 3. - C. 353 - 355. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.3.8879.
Budaev A.V. Publichnaya diplomatiya v rossiysko-brazil'skikh otnosheniyakh // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2014. - 2. - C. 197 - 205. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.2.10164.
Chikharev I.A., Stoletov O.V. Universitety kak sub'ekty
publichnoy diplomatii // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 519 - 529. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.4.9752.
G. Yu. Filimonov, S. A. Tsaturyan Sotsial'nye seti kak innovatsionnyy mekhanizm
«myagkogo» vozdeystviya i upravleniya
massovym soznaniem // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2012. - 1. - C. 65 - 75.
Korobeynikov A.G., Grishentsev A.Yu., Svyatkina M.N. Primenenie intellektual'nykh agentov magnitnykh izmereniy dlya monitoringa ob'ektov zheleznodorozhnoy infrastruktury // NB: Kibernetika i programmirovanie. - 2013. - 3. - C. 9 - 20. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4196.2013.3.8737. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/kp/article_8737.html

Review: From the political standpoint the topic of the article is among one of the most actual issues in the sphere of international relations of Russia and other states, specifically, China. Regional relations between the two states play an important role in the formation of integration processes, providing for the economic basis for the formation of the strong Russian-Chinese political alliance, serving as a counterweight to other political unions and associations in the international political arena. Obviously growing political and economic role of the Communist China provides important prerequisites for defining, studies and development of the relations between the Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of China in the regional dimension. Also, Russia and China have common economic and political interests, especially in bordering regions – Siberia and the Far East, which need to be studied. The methodology of studies was formed with the principles of systemic and comparative approaches towards the issue. Evaluation of regional relations between Russia and China within this context allow one to see the development of this matter within the context of dynamically developing and changing political and economic relations. The systemic approach has allowed to evaluate the elements of the Russian-Chinese cooperation as a coherent work of elements within the system of international relations. Russia and China play an important role in the Asian-Pacific region. These bilateral relations have always been taking an important place in the foreign policies of both states, since they share close geographic, geopolitical, geo-economical ties and cultural exchanges due to the historical relations between them. It has to do with the fact that sharpness of the international problems require common measures taken by the two states, calls for finding new mechanisms for cooperation and integration, including those in their regional dimension.

Keywords: center, regions, modernization, industry, potential, natural resources, bordering regions, Russia, China, the Far East.

Contact information: Repyeva, Anastasia Mihailovna, 119991, Russia, Moskva, GSP-1, Lomonosovskiy prospect, 27, korpus 4.

References:
Koptseva N.P. K voprosu o sokhranenii i vosproizvodstve traditsionnoy kul'tury korennykh malochislennykh narodov Severa, Sibiri i Dal'nego Vostoka v Sibirskom federal'nom okruge // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki.-2013.-12.-C. 1-16. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2013.12.10768. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_10768.html
A.A. Lysikov Osobennosti mezhgosudarstvennogo sotrudnichestva Rossii i Kitaya. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo.-2011.-6.-C. 34-37.
Yashina G. Sibir' i Dal'niy Vostok: razvitie ili privatizatsiya. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://kapital-rus.ru/articles/article/22618
Gusher A.I. Novyy etap razvitiya Sibiri i Dal'nego Vostoka // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2013.-2.-C. 112-117. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.02.1.
Tyapochkin S. Tsena druzhby s Kitaem – Sibir'. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://www.londonru.com/chine/
Rasporyazhenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 14.07.2012 N 1267-r.
Rosbalt. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://www.rosbalt.ru/main/2013/01/20/1083582.html
Sibir' i Dal'niy Vostok v sud'be i na karte Rossii. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://svop.ru/public/2001/content0004400100.html
Manoylo A.V. Upravlenie konfliktami. Model' psikhologicheskoy operatsii. // Akmeologiya.-2009.-№1. – S. 64-74.
Manoylo A.V. Model' informatsionno-psikhologicheskoy operatsii v mezhdunarodnykh konfliktakh. // Pravo i politika.-2008.-№6. – S.1387-1394.
Manoylo A.V. Modeli informatsionnogo vozdeystviya na razreshenie mezhdunarodnykh i vnutripoliticheskikh konfliktov. / A.V. Manoylo // Federalizm.-2008.-№3. – S. 159-172.
O.Gerasimenko, A.Gabuev. «Zhizn' posle deneg».-Zhurnal «Vlast'» ot 9 sentyabrya 2013 g.
Avakov A.I. Sibir' i Dal'niy Vostok: problemy regional'nogo razvitiya i puti ikh resheniya. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://www.km.ru/referats/333414-sibir-i-dalnii-vostok-problemy-regionalnogo-razvitiya-i-puti-ikh-resheniya
Andreeva E., Shvetsov A. Strategiya dlya Rossii: novoe osvoenie Sibiri i Dal'nego Vostoka. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://siberia-republic.com/stati/stati-raznyh-avtorov/strategija-dlja-rosi-novoe-osvoenie-sibiri-i-dalnego-vostoka.html
Borodin E.A.. Sovremennye politicheskie realii Tsentral'noy Azii: Rossiya, Kitay i Kyrgyzstan. // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2014.-№ 1.-C. 27-39. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.1.9997
S. A. Voronin. Aziya ili Evropa? Rossiya v poiskakh sebya. Nekotorye mysli o glavnom. // Istoricheskiy zhurnal: nauchnye issledovaniya.-2013.-№ 2.-C. 201-212. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1972.2013.02.9
E. V. Solov'eva. Strategicheskoe partnerstvo Rossii i Kitaya kak faktor kul'turnogo vzaimodeystviya v sovremennykh politicheskikh usloviyakh. // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2012.-№ 1.-C. 95-101.
Li Guan' tsyun'. Kitayskaya morskaya strategiya i politika na sovremennom etape. // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2011.-№ 6.-C. 79-84.
L. M. Isaev. Mesto Shankhayskoy organizatsii sotrudnichestva v politike Kazakhstana.. // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations.-2011.-№ 1.
V. A. Gaykin. Geopolitika evraziyskogo prostranstva i proekt “Tumangan”.. // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene.-2010.-№ 7.
Gen Khaytyan'. Konfutsianstvo i politicheskoe rukovodstvo Kitaya posledney chetverti KhKh — nachala XXI vv.. // Pravo i politika.-2010.-№ 6.
A. G. Sataev. Migratsiya inostrannykh grazhdan na Dal'niy Vostok i problema natsional'noy bezopasnosti Rossii. // Pravo i politika.-2009.-№ 4.

References (transliteration):
Koptseva N.P. K voprosu o sokhranenii i vosproizvodstve traditsionnoy kul'tury korennykh malochislennykh narodov Severa, Sibiri i Dal'nego Vostoka v Sibirskom federal'nom okruge // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki.-2013.-12.-C. 1-16. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2013.12.10768. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_10768.html
A.A. Lysikov Osobennosti mezhgosudarstvennogo sotrudnichestva Rossii i Kitaya. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo.-2011.-6.-C. 34-37.
Yashina G. Sibir' i Dal'niy Vostok: razvitie ili privatizatsiya. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://kapital-rus.ru/articles/article/22618
Gusher A.I. Novyy etap razvitiya Sibiri i Dal'nego Vostoka // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2013.-2.-C. 112-117. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.02.1.
Tyapochkin S. Tsena druzhby s Kitaem – Sibir'. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://www.londonru.com/chine/
Rasporyazhenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 14.07.2012 N 1267-r.
Rosbalt. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://www.rosbalt.ru/main/2013/01/20/1083582.html
Sibir' i Dal'niy Vostok v sud'be i na karte Rossii. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://svop.ru/public/2001/content0004400100.html
Manoylo A.V. Upravlenie konfliktami. Model' psikhologicheskoy operatsii. // Akmeologiya.-2009.-№1. – S. 64-74.
Manoylo A.V. Model' informatsionno-psikhologicheskoy operatsii v mezhdunarodnykh konfliktakh. // Pravo i politika.-2008.-№6. – S.1387-1394.
Manoylo A.V. Modeli informatsionnogo vozdeystviya na razreshenie mezhdunarodnykh i vnutripoliticheskikh konfliktov. / A.V. Manoylo // Federalizm.-2008.-№3. – S. 159-172.
O.Gerasimenko, A.Gabuev. «Zhizn' posle deneg».-Zhurnal «Vlast'» ot 9 sentyabrya 2013 g.
Avakov A.I. Sibir' i Dal'niy Vostok: problemy regional'nogo razvitiya i puti ikh resheniya. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://www.km.ru/referats/333414-sibir-i-dalnii-vostok-problemy-regionalnogo-razvitiya-i-puti-ikh-resheniya
Andreeva E., Shvetsov A. Strategiya dlya Rossii: novoe osvoenie Sibiri i Dal'nego Vostoka. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://siberia-republic.com/stati/stati-raznyh-avtorov/strategija-dlja-rosi-novoe-osvoenie-sibiri-i-dalnego-vostoka.html
Borodin E.A.. Sovremennye politicheskie realii Tsentral'noy Azii: Rossiya, Kitay i Kyrgyzstan. // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2014.-№ 1.-C. 27-39. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.1.9997
S. A. Voronin. Aziya ili Evropa? Rossiya v poiskakh sebya. Nekotorye mysli o glavnom. // Istoricheskiy zhurnal: nauchnye issledovaniya.-2013.-№ 2.-C. 201-212. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1972.2013.02.9
E. V. Solov'eva. Strategicheskoe partnerstvo Rossii i Kitaya kak faktor kul'turnogo vzaimodeystviya v sovremennykh politicheskikh usloviyakh. // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2012.-№ 1.-C. 95-101.
Li Guan' tsyun'. Kitayskaya morskaya strategiya i politika na sovremennom etape. // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2011.-№ 6.-C. 79-84.
L. M. Isaev. Mesto Shankhayskoy organizatsii sotrudnichestva v politike Kazakhstana.. // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations.-2011.-№ 1.
V. A. Gaykin. Geopolitika evraziyskogo prostranstva i proekt “Tumangan”.. // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene.-2010.-№ 7.
Gen Khaytyan'. Konfutsianstvo i politicheskoe rukovodstvo Kitaya posledney chetverti KhKh — nachala XXI vv.. // Pravo i politika.-2010.-№ 6.
A. G. Sataev. Migratsiya inostrannykh grazhdan na Dal'niy Vostok i problema natsional'noy bezopasnosti Rossii. // Pravo i politika.-2009.-№ 4.

Review: The intercultural communication serving as a medium between cultures and traditions of various nations and states of the modern world is the foremost important technology of public diplomacy in the XXI century. In late XX and early XXI century Germany has been a key strategic partner of Russia among the EU Member States. In addition, Germany is somewhat like a guide for Russia in the EU. Currently Russian-German cultural cooperation develops progressively and successfully. The methodological basis for the studies involves systemic, systemic structural, geopolitical and cultural civilization approach, methods of analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, modeling, observation. Russian-German cultural cooperation fits within the strategy of historical reconciliation, which is implemented by both parties, of stimulation of communication among our nations and their in-depth acquaintance with the culture and spiritual values of Russia and Germany. Public diplomacy of Germany is aimed at the formation of the positive image of Germany and spreading the German values in Russia with the help of intercultural communications in order to strengthen strategic partnership between the states.

Keywords: politics, administration, public diplomacy, Germany, strategic cooperation, intercultural communication, Russia, EU, security, political regime.

Contact information: Bezrukova, Maria Vladimirovna, 101000, Russia, Moskva, pr. Vernadskogo, 88.

References:
Vinogradova E.A. Obshchestvennaya diplomatiya stran ALBA pered vyzovami globalizatsii. Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie. Elektronnyy vestnik. Vypusk № 44. Iyun' 2014 g.
Glagolev V. S., Biryukov N.I., Zubina N.N. Mezhkul'turnaya kommunikatsiya v usloviyakh globalizatsii. – M.: Prospekt, 2010.
Golov A.A. Druz'ya i nedrugi Rossii v otsenkakh rossiyan. [Elektronnyy resurs]. – URL: www.polit.ru/research/2007/06/05/countries.html (data obrashcheniya 14.02.2013)
Dolinskiy A. Diskurs o publichnoy diplomatii. // Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. Tom 9, № 1(25). Yanvar'–aprel' 2011.
Interes k Rossii v Germanii seychas krayne vysok-posol FRG v Rossii Ul'rikh Brandenburg – interv'yu(13.11.12.) [Elektronnyy resurs]. – URL: http://www.itar-tass.com/c49/570471.html (data obrashcheniya: 2.03.2013)
Pavlov N. Rossiya i Germaniya pered vyzovami XXI veka // Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, № 6, Iyun' 2012. –S. 40.
Shpanger Kh. Germaniya i Rossiya: nezhdannoe strategicheskoe partnerstvo. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, № 6, Iyun' 2010.
Mark Leonard, Catherine Stead, Conrad Smewing. Public Diplomacy. London: The Foreign Policy Centre, 2002.
Schollgen G. Der Auftritt. Deutschlands Ruckkehr auf die Weltbuhne. Berlin, 2004.
Manoylo A.V. Model' informatsionno-psikhologicheskoy operatsii v mezhdunarodnykh konfliktakh. // Pravo i politika.-2008.-№6. – S.1387-1394.
Manoylo A.V. Upravlenie konfliktami. Model' psikhologicheskoy operatsii. // Akmeologiya.-2009.-№1. – S. 64-74.
Manoylo A.V. Informatsionnoe protivoborstvo v usloviyakh psikhologicheskoy voyny. // Zakon i pravo.-2003.-№12. – S. 31-34.
Manoylo A.V. Nesilovoe regulirovanie mezhdunarodnykh konfliktov. Kul'turno-tsivilizatsionnye paradigmy. // Kosmopolis.-2008.-№2. – S.168-174.
Manoylo A.V. Psikhologicheskie operatsii: modeli i tekhnologii upravleniya konfliktami. // Politeks (Politicheskaya ekspertiza).-2008.-№3 .-S. 62-73.
Manoylo A.V. Psikhologicheskie operatsii SShA v Irake. // Kosmopolis.-2008.-№1. – S.124-128.
Manoylo A.V. Model' informatsionno-psikhologicheskoy operatsii v mezhdunarodnykh konfliktakh // Pravo i politika.-2008.-№6. – S.1387-1394.
Zol'nova M.G. Obshchestvennaya diplomatiya Shvetsii // Trendy i upravlenie. - 2014. - 2. - C. 137 - 146. DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2014.2.12407.
Zvorygina M.A. Rossiyskiy federalizm i zarubezhnyy opyt konsotsial'noy demokratii // Trendy i upravlenie. - 2014. - 1. - C. 14 - 20. DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2014.1.12384.
Manoylo A.V. O protivodeystvii
rasprostraneniyu ideologii
«tsvetnykh revolyutsiy»
v universitetskoy
studencheskoy srede // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 420 - 423. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.4.9755.
Neymatova A.Ya. MID Rossii i novaya
publichnaya diplomatiya // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2013. - 1. - C. 80 - 85. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.01.9.
Karpovich O.G. Sovremennye kontseptsii i modeli upravleniya
mezhdunarodnymi konfliktami
(sravnitel'nyy politologicheskiy analiz) // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2013. - 4. - C. 605 - 612. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2013.4.6434.
Egorov V.G. Rezhimnaya
transformatsiya postsovetskikh
nezavisimykh gosudarstv // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 452 - 470. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.4.9398.
Gusher A.I. Ekspertnaya otsenka politiko-ekonomicheskoy situatsii v Ukraine // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2014. - 3. - C. 326 - 331. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.3.11815.
Manoylo A.V. O protivodeystvii tsvetnym revolyutsiyam // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2014. - 3. - C. 332 - 363. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.3.12060.
Budaev A.V. Osnovnye podkhody k ispol'zovaniyu «myagkoy sily» v interesakh realizatsii vneshney politiki Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Trendy i upravlenie. - 2014. - 2. - C. 175 - 187. DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2014.2.11784.
Spiridonov V.V. Finansovo-ekonomicheskie prichiny politicheskogo krizisa na Ukraine. Vzglyad cherez prizmu analiza bankovskoy sistemy strany // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2014. - 3. - C. 398 - 405. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.3.11740.
Spiridonov V.V. Ekonomicheskiy podkhod k analizu prichin politicheskogo konflikta na Ukraine // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2014. - 2. - C. 254 - 261. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.2.11527.
S. A. Kondakov Truboprovodnaya diplomatiya Rossii // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2012. - 1. - C. 128 - 138.

References (transliteration):
Vinogradova E.A. Obshchestvennaya diplomatiya stran ALBA pered vyzovami globalizatsii. Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie. Elektronnyy vestnik. Vypusk № 44. Iyun' 2014 g.
Glagolev V. S., Biryukov N.I., Zubina N.N. Mezhkul'turnaya kommunikatsiya v usloviyakh globalizatsii. – M.: Prospekt, 2010.
Golov A.A. Druz'ya i nedrugi Rossii v otsenkakh rossiyan. [Elektronnyy resurs]. – URL: www.polit.ru/research/2007/06/05/countries.html (data obrashcheniya 14.02.2013)
Dolinskiy A. Diskurs o publichnoy diplomatii. // Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. Tom 9, № 1(25). Yanvar'–aprel' 2011.
Interes k Rossii v Germanii seychas krayne vysok-posol FRG v Rossii Ul'rikh Brandenburg – interv'yu(13.11.12.) [Elektronnyy resurs]. – URL: http://www.itar-tass.com/c49/570471.html (data obrashcheniya: 2.03.2013)
Pavlov N. Rossiya i Germaniya pered vyzovami XXI veka // Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, № 6, Iyun' 2012. –S. 40.
Shpanger Kh. Germaniya i Rossiya: nezhdannoe strategicheskoe partnerstvo. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, № 6, Iyun' 2010.
Mark Leonard, Catherine Stead, Conrad Smewing. Public Diplomacy. London: The Foreign Policy Centre, 2002.
Schollgen G. Der Auftritt. Deutschlands Ruckkehr auf die Weltbuhne. Berlin, 2004.
Manoylo A.V. Model' informatsionno-psikhologicheskoy operatsii v mezhdunarodnykh konfliktakh. // Pravo i politika.-2008.-№6. – S.1387-1394.
Manoylo A.V. Upravlenie konfliktami. Model' psikhologicheskoy operatsii. // Akmeologiya.-2009.-№1. – S. 64-74.
Manoylo A.V. Informatsionnoe protivoborstvo v usloviyakh psikhologicheskoy voyny. // Zakon i pravo.-2003.-№12. – S. 31-34.
Manoylo A.V. Nesilovoe regulirovanie mezhdunarodnykh konfliktov. Kul'turno-tsivilizatsionnye paradigmy. // Kosmopolis.-2008.-№2. – S.168-174.
Manoylo A.V. Psikhologicheskie operatsii: modeli i tekhnologii upravleniya konfliktami. // Politeks (Politicheskaya ekspertiza).-2008.-№3 .-S. 62-73.
Manoylo A.V. Psikhologicheskie operatsii SShA v Irake. // Kosmopolis.-2008.-№1. – S.124-128.
Manoylo A.V. Model' informatsionno-psikhologicheskoy operatsii v mezhdunarodnykh konfliktakh // Pravo i politika.-2008.-№6. – S.1387-1394.
Zol'nova M.G. Obshchestvennaya diplomatiya Shvetsii // Trendy i upravlenie. - 2014. - 2. - C. 137 - 146. DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2014.2.12407.
Zvorygina M.A. Rossiyskiy federalizm i zarubezhnyy opyt konsotsial'noy demokratii // Trendy i upravlenie. - 2014. - 1. - C. 14 - 20. DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2014.1.12384.
Manoylo A.V. O protivodeystvii
rasprostraneniyu ideologii
«tsvetnykh revolyutsiy»
v universitetskoy
studencheskoy srede // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 420 - 423. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.4.9755.
Neymatova A.Ya. MID Rossii i novaya
publichnaya diplomatiya // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2013. - 1. - C. 80 - 85. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.01.9.
Karpovich O.G. Sovremennye kontseptsii i modeli upravleniya
mezhdunarodnymi konfliktami
(sravnitel'nyy politologicheskiy analiz) // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2013. - 4. - C. 605 - 612. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2013.4.6434.
Egorov V.G. Rezhimnaya
transformatsiya postsovetskikh
nezavisimykh gosudarstv // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 452 - 470. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.4.9398.
Gusher A.I. Ekspertnaya otsenka politiko-ekonomicheskoy situatsii v Ukraine // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2014. - 3. - C. 326 - 331. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.3.11815.
Manoylo A.V. O protivodeystvii tsvetnym revolyutsiyam // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2014. - 3. - C. 332 - 363. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.3.12060.
Budaev A.V. Osnovnye podkhody k ispol'zovaniyu «myagkoy sily» v interesakh realizatsii vneshney politiki Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Trendy i upravlenie. - 2014. - 2. - C. 175 - 187. DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2014.2.11784.
Spiridonov V.V. Finansovo-ekonomicheskie prichiny politicheskogo krizisa na Ukraine. Vzglyad cherez prizmu analiza bankovskoy sistemy strany // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2014. - 3. - C. 398 - 405. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.3.11740.
Spiridonov V.V. Ekonomicheskiy podkhod k analizu prichin politicheskogo konflikta na Ukraine // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2014. - 2. - C. 254 - 261. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.2.11527.
S. A. Kondakov Truboprovodnaya diplomatiya Rossii // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2012. - 1. - C. 128 - 138.

Review: The modern world includes the disparity between formal democratic institutions and cultural, historical, value-oriented tradition, which are historically formed in certain states (societies). The matter of democracies meeting formal procedural requirements, while their democratic nature is dubious, formed new concepts for the description of the changes, which are generally called “democracy with adjectives”. Currently the discourse of “democracies with adjectives” involves over 60 states, and the most detailed discussion is based upon the examples of Latin American states. The methodological basis for the studies involves systemic, systemic structural, geopolitical and cultural civilization approach, methods of analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, modeling, observation. The article describes the concept of “democracy with adjectives”, providing graphic examples of states, which are involved in this discourse, singling out certain characteristic features typical of these regions, allowing to show regional spread of democracy problems and their configuration, to find out whether certain problems are typical of one group of states, or the problems have no regional dimension.

Keywords: politics, administration, international relations, democracy, political regime, Latin America, democratization, regional spread, interests, security

Contact information: Shitova, Elena Nikolaevna, 115035, Russia, Moskva, ul. Bolshaya Ordynka, 21.

References:
Manoylo A.V. Natsional'no-gosudarstvennye modeli psikhologicheskogo upravleniya konfliktami. // Obozrevatel'-Observer.-2008.-№2. – S.118-123
Raykhlin E.I. Bylo li neizbezhnym krushenie «sotsializma» v SSSR? Prichiny evolyutsii «real'nogo sotsializma» // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2013.-4.-C. 471-480. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.4.9750.
Zvorygina M.A. Rossiyskiy federalizm i zarubezhnyy opyt konsotsial'noy demokratii // Trendy i upravlenie.-2014.-1.-C. 14-20. DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2014.1.12384.
Valiullin I.I. Evolyutsiya ponyatiya «informatsionnaya voyna» v politicheskoy nauke // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2014.-1.-C. 68-74. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.1.10064.
T. P. Petrova Sovremennoe sostoyanie vneshnepoliticheskikh otnosheniy Rossii i Peru: problemy i perspektivy mezhdunarodnogo sotrudnichestva // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene.-2012.-3.-C. 86-92.
Karpovich O.G. Novyy miroporyadok i konfigurirovanie sistemy mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy vo vneshney politike SShA // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2013.-10.-C. 1270-1275. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.10.10013.
Karpovich O.G. Demokratizatsiya v sovremennykh kontseptsiyakh rossiyskikh i amerikanskikh issledovateley // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene.-2013.-3.-C. 494-500. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2013.3.8083.
T. P. Petrova Diplomaticheskie otnosheniya mezhdu Rossiey i Peru: sovremennoe sostoyanie i dinamika razvitiya // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2012.-1.-C. 46-53.
Karpovich O.G. Demokratiya i demokratizatsiya v kontekste novogo miroporyadka // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2013.-8.-C. 1012-1020. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.8.9142.
Manoylo A.V. Spetsifika tsvetnykh revolyutsiy «Arabskoy vesny». // Izvestiya Ural'sk. Federal'nogo Un-ta. Ser. 3. Obshchestvennye nauki. 2013. №3. S. 30-36.
Manoylo A.V. Siriyskiy tupik «Arabskoy vesny». // Vestn. Mosk. Un-ta. Ser. 12. Politicheskie nauki. 2013. №6. S. 49-56.
Manoylo A.V. Strategii "upravlyaemogo khaosa" v usloviyakh khaotizatsii mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy: mif ili real'nost'? // NB: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. — 2014.-№ 1.-S.1-3. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4226.2014.1.10750. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wi/article_10750.html
Wong, J. Deepening Democracy in Taiwan // Pacific Affairs, V. 76, N. 2 (2003), pp. 235-256
Zakaria, F. The rise of illiberal democracy // Foreign Affairs, (1997)
Sanin, F. Fragile Democracy and Schizophrenic Liberalism: Exit, Voice, and Loyalty in the Andes / International Political Science Rewiew, V. 26, N. 1 (2005), pp. 125-139
Stahler-Sholk, R. El Salvador’s Negotiated Transition: From Low-Intensity Conflict to Low-Intensity Democracy // Journal of Interamerican studies and World Affairs, V. 36, N. 4 (1994), pp. 1-59
Sadiki, L. Political Liberalization in Bin Ali's Tunisia: Facade Democracy // Democratization, V. 9, N. 4 (2002), 122-141
Roque, P.Cr. Angola's Facade Democracy // Journal of Democracy, V. 20, N. 4 ( October 2009), pp. 137-150
Remmer K. Exclusionary democracy // Studies in Comparative International Rueschemeyer Development, V. 20, N. 6 (1986), pp. 64-85
Petrov, Lipman. Hale. Overmanaged Democracy in Russia: Governance Implications of Hybrid Regimes / Carnegie Papers (2010)
Puhle, H. Democratic Consolidation and “Defective Democracies" // Universidad Autonoma de Madrid. Working Paper 47/2005. pp. 1-20.
Neher, C.D. Asian Style Democracy // Asian Survey, V. 34, N. 11 (November 1994), pp. 949-961
Ottaway M. Democracy challenged: the rise of semi-authoritarianism. Carnegie Endowment for International peace. 2003. 256 pp.
O'Donnel, G. Delegative Democracy? // Journal of Democracy , N. 1 (1994)
Nasr V. The Rise of "Muslim Democracy" // Journal of Democracy, V. 16, N. 2 (2005), pp. 13-27
Loveman B. "Protected Democracies" and Military Guardianship: Political Transitions in Latin America,1978-1993 (1994)
Magen A., Morlino L., Hybrid regimes, the rule of law, and external influence on domestic change. 25 p. P 1.
Kasfir N. "No-party Democracy" in Uganda // Journal of Democracy, V. 9, N. 2 (1998), pp. 49-63
Levitsky S., Way L. Elections without democracy: the rise of competitive authoritarianism // Journal of Democracy-Volume 13, Number 2, April 2002, pp. 51-65.
Hagopian and Mainwaring. Democracy in Brazil: Problems and Prospects // World Policy Journal, V. 4, N. 3 (1987), pp. 485-514
Henderson K. The Slovak Republic: explaining defects in democracy // Democratization, V. 11, N. 5 (2004), pp. 133-155
Htun, M. From "Racial Democracy" to Affirmative Action: Changing State Policy on Race in Brazil // Latin American Research Review, V. 39, N. 1 (2004), pp. 60-89
FreedomHouse.org
Fritz, V. Mongolia: The Rise and Travails of a Deviant Democracy // Democratization, V. 15, N. 4 (2008), pp. 766-788
Gills, B. and Rocamora, J. Low Intensity Democracy // Third World Quarterly, V. 13, N. 3 (1992), pp.501-523
Good, K. and Taylor, I. Botswana: A Minimalist Democracy // Democratization, V. 15, N. 4 (2008), pp. 750-765
Farred G. Disorderly Democracy: An Axiomatic Politics // The New Centennial Review, V. 8, N. 2 (2008), pp. 43-65
Dryzek, J.S. Deliberative Democracy in Divided Societies: Alternatives to Agonism and Analgesia / Political Theory, V. 33, N. 2, (April 2005), pp.218-242
Diamond L. Thinking about hybrid regimes // Journal of democracy, V. 13. 2002. # 2. 21-35 pp.
Brumberg, D. The Trap of Liberalized Autocracy // Journal of Democracy-Volume 13, Number 4, October 2002, pp. 56-68.
Croissanta A. From transition to defective democracy: mapping Asian democratization / Democratization, V. 11, N. 5 (2004), pp. 156-178
Beverley Milton-Edwards, Fasade democracy and Jordan / British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, V. 20, N. 2 (1993), pp. 191-203
Berntzen. Democratic Consolidation in Central America: a qualitive comparative approach / Third World Quarterly, V. 14, N. 3, Democratization in the third world (1993), pp. 589-604
Vinogradova E.A. Levyy povorot v Ekvadore // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2013. - 2. - C. 129 - 133. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.02.4.

References (transliteration):
Manoylo A.V. Natsional'no-gosudarstvennye modeli psikhologicheskogo upravleniya konfliktami. // Obozrevatel'-Observer.-2008.-№2. – S.118-123
Raykhlin E.I. Bylo li neizbezhnym krushenie «sotsializma» v SSSR? Prichiny evolyutsii «real'nogo sotsializma» // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2013.-4.-C. 471-480. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.4.9750.
Zvorygina M.A. Rossiyskiy federalizm i zarubezhnyy opyt konsotsial'noy demokratii // Trendy i upravlenie.-2014.-1.-C. 14-20. DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2014.1.12384.
Valiullin I.I. Evolyutsiya ponyatiya «informatsionnaya voyna» v politicheskoy nauke // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2014.-1.-C. 68-74. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.1.10064.
T. P. Petrova Sovremennoe sostoyanie vneshnepoliticheskikh otnosheniy Rossii i Peru: problemy i perspektivy mezhdunarodnogo sotrudnichestva // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene.-2012.-3.-C. 86-92.
Karpovich O.G. Novyy miroporyadok i konfigurirovanie sistemy mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy vo vneshney politike SShA // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2013.-10.-C. 1270-1275. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.10.10013.
Karpovich O.G. Demokratizatsiya v sovremennykh kontseptsiyakh rossiyskikh i amerikanskikh issledovateley // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene.-2013.-3.-C. 494-500. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2013.3.8083.
T. P. Petrova Diplomaticheskie otnosheniya mezhdu Rossiey i Peru: sovremennoe sostoyanie i dinamika razvitiya // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2012.-1.-C. 46-53.
Karpovich O.G. Demokratiya i demokratizatsiya v kontekste novogo miroporyadka // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2013.-8.-C. 1012-1020. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.8.9142.
Manoylo A.V. Spetsifika tsvetnykh revolyutsiy «Arabskoy vesny». // Izvestiya Ural'sk. Federal'nogo Un-ta. Ser. 3. Obshchestvennye nauki. 2013. №3. S. 30-36.
Manoylo A.V. Siriyskiy tupik «Arabskoy vesny». // Vestn. Mosk. Un-ta. Ser. 12. Politicheskie nauki. 2013. №6. S. 49-56.
Manoylo A.V. Strategii "upravlyaemogo khaosa" v usloviyakh khaotizatsii mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy: mif ili real'nost'? // NB: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. — 2014.-№ 1.-S.1-3. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4226.2014.1.10750. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wi/article_10750.html
Wong, J. Deepening Democracy in Taiwan // Pacific Affairs, V. 76, N. 2 (2003), pp. 235-256
Zakaria, F. The rise of illiberal democracy // Foreign Affairs, (1997)
Sanin, F. Fragile Democracy and Schizophrenic Liberalism: Exit, Voice, and Loyalty in the Andes / International Political Science Rewiew, V. 26, N. 1 (2005), pp. 125-139
Stahler-Sholk, R. El Salvador’s Negotiated Transition: From Low-Intensity Conflict to Low-Intensity Democracy // Journal of Interamerican studies and World Affairs, V. 36, N. 4 (1994), pp. 1-59
Sadiki, L. Political Liberalization in Bin Ali's Tunisia: Facade Democracy // Democratization, V. 9, N. 4 (2002), 122-141
Roque, P.Cr. Angola's Facade Democracy // Journal of Democracy, V. 20, N. 4 ( October 2009), pp. 137-150
Remmer K. Exclusionary democracy // Studies in Comparative International Rueschemeyer Development, V. 20, N. 6 (1986), pp. 64-85
Petrov, Lipman. Hale. Overmanaged Democracy in Russia: Governance Implications of Hybrid Regimes / Carnegie Papers (2010)
Puhle, H. Democratic Consolidation and “Defective Democracies" // Universidad Autonoma de Madrid. Working Paper 47/2005. pp. 1-20.
Neher, C.D. Asian Style Democracy // Asian Survey, V. 34, N. 11 (November 1994), pp. 949-961
Ottaway M. Democracy challenged: the rise of semi-authoritarianism. Carnegie Endowment for International peace. 2003. 256 pp.
O'Donnel, G. Delegative Democracy? // Journal of Democracy , N. 1 (1994)
Nasr V. The Rise of "Muslim Democracy" // Journal of Democracy, V. 16, N. 2 (2005), pp. 13-27
Loveman B. "Protected Democracies" and Military Guardianship: Political Transitions in Latin America,1978-1993 (1994)
Magen A., Morlino L., Hybrid regimes, the rule of law, and external influence on domestic change. 25 p. P 1.
Kasfir N. "No-party Democracy" in Uganda // Journal of Democracy, V. 9, N. 2 (1998), pp. 49-63
Levitsky S., Way L. Elections without democracy: the rise of competitive authoritarianism // Journal of Democracy-Volume 13, Number 2, April 2002, pp. 51-65.
Hagopian and Mainwaring. Democracy in Brazil: Problems and Prospects // World Policy Journal, V. 4, N. 3 (1987), pp. 485-514
Henderson K. The Slovak Republic: explaining defects in democracy // Democratization, V. 11, N. 5 (2004), pp. 133-155
Htun, M. From "Racial Democracy" to Affirmative Action: Changing State Policy on Race in Brazil // Latin American Research Review, V. 39, N. 1 (2004), pp. 60-89
FreedomHouse.org
Fritz, V. Mongolia: The Rise and Travails of a Deviant Democracy // Democratization, V. 15, N. 4 (2008), pp. 766-788
Gills, B. and Rocamora, J. Low Intensity Democracy // Third World Quarterly, V. 13, N. 3 (1992), pp.501-523
Good, K. and Taylor, I. Botswana: A Minimalist Democracy // Democratization, V. 15, N. 4 (2008), pp. 750-765
Farred G. Disorderly Democracy: An Axiomatic Politics // The New Centennial Review, V. 8, N. 2 (2008), pp. 43-65
Dryzek, J.S. Deliberative Democracy in Divided Societies: Alternatives to Agonism and Analgesia / Political Theory, V. 33, N. 2, (April 2005), pp.218-242
Diamond L. Thinking about hybrid regimes // Journal of democracy, V. 13. 2002. # 2. 21-35 pp.
Brumberg, D. The Trap of Liberalized Autocracy // Journal of Democracy-Volume 13, Number 4, October 2002, pp. 56-68.
Croissanta A. From transition to defective democracy: mapping Asian democratization / Democratization, V. 11, N. 5 (2004), pp. 156-178
Beverley Milton-Edwards, Fasade democracy and Jordan / British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, V. 20, N. 2 (1993), pp. 191-203
Berntzen. Democratic Consolidation in Central America: a qualitive comparative approach / Third World Quarterly, V. 14, N. 3, Democratization in the third world (1993), pp. 589-604
Vinogradova E.A. Levyy povorot v Ekvadore // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2013. - 2. - C. 129 - 133. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.02.4.