Reference:
Rozin V.M., Golubkova L.G..
The science and nature of administration
// Politics and Society. – 2013. – ¹ 6.
– P. 758-773.
Read the article
Abstract: This work analyzes the challenges which encourage
the viewing of administration from a philosophical
and methodological standpoint (such challenges include
the loss of controllability in the country, excessive
adoption of Western methods of administration. The necessity
of abandoning social engineering administration
schemes, and the lack of an accurate notion by the administrators
of their mission and their place in the societal division
of labour). The authors point out three ideas which
they used during their study of administration: first, they
began viewing administration within the scope of a broader
whole – on one hand, in the context of globalization,
and on the other hand, within the scope of processes and
transformations which occur in our country. They tried to
implement the principles of culturology and humanitarian
(historical) knowledge in the study of administration,
analyzing it from the viewpoint of goals of preservation
and development of Russian culture. This work outlines
a new theoretical understanding of administration, which
is viewed as a part of social organism which exists in a
different social environment. The analysis of administration
implies the emergence of four key factors: 1) methodology
and technology of management, 2) communities of administrators interacting with other professional communities
in various ways, 3) interaction of business organizations
(enterprises, companies, institutions and social
structures 4) external social environment. The authors introduce
the definition of administration as a mechanism of
development, administration within administration, various
forms of practice in administration, values and pragmatic
approach to administration.
Keywords: administration, conditions, situation, practice, development, transformation, community, environment, efficiency, implementation
References:
Rozin V.M., Golubkova L.G. Upravlenie v mirovom i rossiyskom trendakh. M., 2013.
Golubkova L.G., Rozin V.M. Standartizatsiya kachestva upravleniya kak uslovie stanovleniya i razvitiya sovremennogo proizvodstvennogo organizma // Politika i obshchestvo. 2011, ¹ 4.
Tikhonov A.V. Sotsiologiya upravleniya. M., 2007. S. 32, 33, 122.
Shchedrovitskiy G.P. Orgupravlencheskoe myshlenie: ideologiya, metodologiya, tekhnologiya (kurs lektsiy) /Iz arkhiva G.P.Shchedrovitskogo. T.4 ORU (1), 2-e izd. M., 2003.
Prokhorov A.P. Russkaya model' upravleniya. M., 2002.
Golubkova L.G., Rozin V.M. Filosofiya upravleniya. Yoshkar-Ola, 2010.
Rozin M.V. Uspekh bez strategii: Tekhnologii gibkogo menedzhmenta. M., 2011.
Komarov S.V., Kordon S.I. Osnovy metodologii: sistemodeyatel'nostnyy podkhod. Kategorii. Perm', 2005. S. 144-147.
Rozin V.M. Nauka: proiskhozhdenie, razvitie, tipologiya, novaya kontseptualizatsiya. Moskva-Voronezh, M., 2008.
Grinspen A. Epokha potryaseniy. Problemy i perspektivy mirovo