Review: The research subject is the range of tactical and criminalistic issues of investigating action provided by the article 186.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation “Acquisition of information about the connections between subscribers and (or) subscriber devices”. The author considers the tactics and the legal nature of acquisition of information about the connections between subscribers and (or) subscriber devices. Besides, the paper studies certain aspects of interaction of the parties of criminal procedure (prosecutor, court and investigator) and other subjects of criminal procedure. The author applies the set of general and special scientific methods including the normative-legal method, the system method, analysis, synthesis, deduction, induction and others. The scientific novelty of the study is conditioned by the fact that acquisition of information about the connections between subscribers and (or) subscriber devices has been included in the criminal code not long ago, therefore, at present there is no common opinion about the tactics of its implementation. Besides, some problems of its legal nature haven’t been solved yet, leading to difficulties in its application. 

Keywords: communications provider , technical means, investigating action, technical recommendations, investigator, mobile communications, information about connections, detailing , subscriber device, subscriber

References:
Arkhipova N.A. Organizatsionno-takticheskie aspekty raskrytiya i rassledovaniya prestupleniy v situatsiyakh ispol'zovaniya sredstv mobil'noy svyazi: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. SPb., 2011. S. 21.
Vazyulin S. A., Vasyukov V. F. Poluchenie informatsii o soedineniyakh mezhdu abonentami: spetsifika protsedury // Ugolovnyy protsess. 2014. ¹ 1. S. 10–20.
Kal'nitskiy V.V. Voprosy pravovoy reglamentatsii sledstvennykh deystviy na sovremennom etape // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2015. ¹ 2. S. 34.
O svyazi: federal'nyy zakon ot 07.07.2003 ¹ 126-FZ. (deystvuyushchaya redaktsiya). [Elektronnyy resurs].-URL: http:// www.consultant.ru. (data obrashcheniya 02.12.2015 g.)
Sayt MVD Rossii [Elektronnyy resurs].-URL https://mvd.ru/news. (data obrashcheniya 29.11.2015 g.)
Stel'makh V. Yu. Poluchenie informatsii o soedineniyakh mezhdu abonentami i (ili) abonentskimi ustroystvami kak sledstvennoe deystvie: monografiya / V. Yu. Stel'makh. – Ekaterinburg: Ural'skiy yuridicheskiy institut MVD Rossii, 2014. S.40.
Tendentsii rossiyskogo rynka mobil'noy svyazi (Sotovye dannye 2015) // URL: acm-consulting.com (data obrashcheniya 10.12.2015 g.)
Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii. ch. 3 st. 186.1 (deystvuyushchaya redaktsiya). [Elektronnyy resurs]. − URL: http:/www.consultant.ru (data obrashcheniya 29.11.2015 g.)
Tsykora A.A. Nekotorye problemy proizvodstva sledstvennogo deystviya «Poluchenie informatsii o soedineniyakh mezhdu abonentami i (ili) abonentskimi ustroystvami» // Izvestiya Tul'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2013. ¹ 3-2. S. 239.

References (transliteration):
Arkhipova N.A. Organizatsionno-takticheskie aspekty raskrytiya i rassledovaniya prestupleniy v situatsiyakh ispol'zovaniya sredstv mobil'noy svyazi: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. SPb., 2011. S. 21.
Vazyulin S. A., Vasyukov V. F. Poluchenie informatsii o soedineniyakh mezhdu abonentami: spetsifika protsedury // Ugolovnyy protsess. 2014. ¹ 1. S. 10–20.
Kal'nitskiy V.V. Voprosy pravovoy reglamentatsii sledstvennykh deystviy na sovremennom etape // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2015. ¹ 2. S. 34.
O svyazi: federal'nyy zakon ot 07.07.2003 ¹ 126-FZ. (deystvuyushchaya redaktsiya). [Elektronnyy resurs].-URL: http:// www.consultant.ru. (data obrashcheniya 02.12.2015 g.)
Sayt MVD Rossii [Elektronnyy resurs].-URL https://mvd.ru/news. (data obrashcheniya 29.11.2015 g.)
Stel'makh V. Yu. Poluchenie informatsii o soedineniyakh mezhdu abonentami i (ili) abonentskimi ustroystvami kak sledstvennoe deystvie: monografiya / V. Yu. Stel'makh. – Ekaterinburg: Ural'skiy yuridicheskiy institut MVD Rossii, 2014. S.40.
Tendentsii rossiyskogo rynka mobil'noy svyazi (Sotovye dannye 2015) // URL: acm-consulting.com (data obrashcheniya 10.12.2015 g.)
Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii. ch. 3 st. 186.1 (deystvuyushchaya redaktsiya). [Elektronnyy resurs]. − URL: http:/www.consultant.ru (data obrashcheniya 29.11.2015 g.)
Tsykora A.A. Nekotorye problemy proizvodstva sledstvennogo deystviya «Poluchenie informatsii o soedineniyakh mezhdu abonentami i (ili) abonentskimi ustroystvami» // Izvestiya Tul'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2013. ¹ 3-2. S. 239.

Review: The research subject includes the modern methods of forensic enquiry. The research object is forensic enquiry. The author considers such aspects as the modern methodology of expert studies and the differentiation of the levels of expert knowledge. The author points out the ways to solve methodological problems connected with a diversity of forensic expertise, taking into account that each expertise is a part of a corresponding science, and the forensic expertise classes are defined on the base of the sciences differentiation. The paper differentiates the levels of methodology of forensic expertise: the philosophical, including the general principles of cognition and the categorial structure; the general scientific principles and forms of study, formal theories of methodology, and the scientific methodology as a set of methods, approaches and search procedures applied in criminalistics; the last level of methodology includes the very methods and techniques of study including the set of procedures ensuring the comparability and validity of empiric materials, their processing and registering in the common knowledge. The research methodology is based on the doctrinal sources of the Soviet and the modern periods from the position of the general methodology of the theory of law and criminalistics. The author reveals the analogy with general scientific approaches with the following sequence: philosophical methodology, methods and techniques of expertise. The paper contains the author’s vision of the methodology of forensic expertise as a scientific doctrine of methods, instruments, structure and logical organization of expertise. The novelty of the study lies in the ranking of subject methods of forensic expertise which lie on another specific level of methodological knowledge – the level of research methods and techniques. The paper contains the comparison of the system of scientific methods of forensic expertise. 

Keywords: forensic expertise, theory of expertise, forensic expert, forensic, research, group of methods, criminalistics, expertise methods, expert activity, expertise

References:
Rossiyskaya E.R. Sudebnaya ekspertiza v grazhdanskom, arbitrazhnom, administrativnom i ugolovnom protsesse. M., 2009. 656 s.
Tsypkin D. O. Neskol'ko predvaritel'nykh zamechaniy o edinstve ekspertnoy nauki i o problemakh sovremennogo istochnikovedeniya// Fotografiya. Izobrazhenie. Dokument. 2012. ¹3 (3). S. 3-7.
Plesovskikh Yu.G. Sudebno-ekspertnoe issledovanie: metodologiya, metodika, metod// Izvestiya IGEA. 2005. ¹3-4. S. 77-79.
Peshchak Ya. Obshcheteoreticheskie problemy kriminalistiki. M.: Akademiya MVD SSSR, 1977. 229 c.
Vinberg A.I., Shlyakhov A.R. Obshchaya kharakteristika metodov ekspertnogo issledovaniya// Obshchee uchenie o metodakh sudebnoy ekspertizy. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov. M.: Izd-vo VNIISE, 1977. ¹ 28. S. 54-93.
Vinogradova N.I., Matvienko E.A. Estestvennonauchnye metody sudebno-ekspertnykh issledovaniy. Kurs lektsiy. M.: Shchit-M, 2013. 416 s.
Aliev I.A., Aver'yanova T.V. Kontseptual'nye osnovy obshchey teorii sudebnoy ekspertizy. Baku: Gyandzhlik, 1992. 186 s.
Sharov V. I. Sistema metodov sudebnoy ekspertizy// Vestnik NNGU. 2014. ¹3-2. S.269-272.
Entsiklopediya sudebnoy ekspertizy. M., 1999. 552 s.
Yudin E.G. Metodologiya nauki. Sistemnost'. Deyatel'nost'. M., 1997. 444 s.

References (transliteration):
Rossiyskaya E.R. Sudebnaya ekspertiza v grazhdanskom, arbitrazhnom, administrativnom i ugolovnom protsesse. M., 2009. 656 s.
Tsypkin D. O. Neskol'ko predvaritel'nykh zamechaniy o edinstve ekspertnoy nauki i o problemakh sovremennogo istochnikovedeniya// Fotografiya. Izobrazhenie. Dokument. 2012. ¹3 (3). S. 3-7.
Plesovskikh Yu.G. Sudebno-ekspertnoe issledovanie: metodologiya, metodika, metod// Izvestiya IGEA. 2005. ¹3-4. S. 77-79.
Peshchak Ya. Obshcheteoreticheskie problemy kriminalistiki. M.: Akademiya MVD SSSR, 1977. 229 c.
Vinberg A.I., Shlyakhov A.R. Obshchaya kharakteristika metodov ekspertnogo issledovaniya// Obshchee uchenie o metodakh sudebnoy ekspertizy. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov. M.: Izd-vo VNIISE, 1977. ¹ 28. S. 54-93.
Vinogradova N.I., Matvienko E.A. Estestvennonauchnye metody sudebno-ekspertnykh issledovaniy. Kurs lektsiy. M.: Shchit-M, 2013. 416 s.
Aliev I.A., Aver'yanova T.V. Kontseptual'nye osnovy obshchey teorii sudebnoy ekspertizy. Baku: Gyandzhlik, 1992. 186 s.
Sharov V. I. Sistema metodov sudebnoy ekspertizy// Vestnik NNGU. 2014. ¹3-2. S.269-272.
Entsiklopediya sudebnoy ekspertizy. M., 1999. 552 s.
Yudin E.G. Metodologiya nauki. Sistemnost'. Deyatel'nost'. M., 1997. 444 s.

Review: The authors consider disputable questions about the subject of the science of criminalistics. The paper contains a brief analysis of the scholars’ positions on the notion of the “subject” of this science, and of the masters and bachelors of criminalistics education in the contemporary Russian Federation. The processes taking place in criminal and criminal procedural legislation need for a comprehension; they are important for criminalistics as far as they affect its subject. The research methodology is based on the analysis of the existing views of the concept of the “subject” of criminalistics in the historical development. The novelty of the study lies in the discussion about the scientific role of or a common sense theory in criminalistics. Criminalistics as a science is aimed at elaboration and systematization of objective knowledge about the laws of emergence, detection, research, evaluation and use of the factual data (traces) about the mechanism of a crime and its participants. 

Keywords: investigation, information, study of traces, evidence, research, education system, knowledge, competences, criminal activity, subject of criminalistics

References:
Kvyk A. V., Filatov S. N. Dokazatel'stvennoe znachenie zaklyucheniya ol'faktornoy sudebnoy ekspertizy po materialam sudebnoy praktiki Primorskogo kraya // Aktual'nye problemy ugolovnogo protsessa i kriminalistiki: sbornik statey nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, Vladivostok, 10–11 aprelya 2015 g. / [otv. red. A.F. Rekhovskiy; nauch. red. V.V. Yarovenko]. – Vladivostok: Izd-vo Dal'nevost. un-ta, 2015. – S. 86-87.
Starovoytov V.I. Sudebnaya ol'faktornaya ekspertiza sledov pakhnushchikh veshchestv iz krovi i pota cheloveka // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2011. ¹ 12. – S. 75.
Kulieva R.O. Sovremennaya kriminalistika: odorologiya ili ol'faktronika? http://static.bsu.az/w8/Xeberler%20Jurnali/Sosial%202011%201/79-87.pdf
Osmanov T. Yu. Primenenie metoda slovesnogo portreta v sledstvennoy i operativnoy deyatel'nosti (Metodologicheskie i psikhologicheskie aspekty problemy): Dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2000. – S. 121-122.
Yarovenko V.V. Protsessual'naya fiksatsiya materialov, poluchennykh s primeneniem spetsial'nykh tekhnicheskikh sredstv, rabotayushchikh v avtomaticheskom rezhime //Perspektivnye innovatsii v nauke, obrazovanii, proizvodstve i transporte ‘2014,– Odessa: KUPRIENKO SV, 2014. S. 54-56. http://www.orgcom@sworld.com.ua
Yarovenko V.V., Poleshchuk O.V. Pribory videonablyudeniya i videoregistratory kak istochniki informatsii o sobytii. Sovremennye problemy i puti ikh resheniya v nauke, transporte, proizvodstve i obrazovanii '2014 // Sbornik nauchnykh trudov SWorld . Vypusk 2. Tom 30. – Odessa: KUPRIENKO CV, 2014. – C.22-25.
Yarovenko V.V., Tekhniko-kriminalisticheskoe obespechenie fiksatsii khoda i rezul'tatov sledstvennogo deystviya //Sbornik nauchnykh trudov SWorld. – Vypusk 3. Tom 32. – Odessa: KUPRIENKO SV, 2013 – S. 47-50.
Yarovenko V.V., Poleshchuk O.V.Poluchenie informatsii s sistem videonablyudeniya i videoregistratorov (soav.)// Sovremennye problemy i puti ikh resheniya v nauke, transporte, proizvodstve i obrazovanii 2013". – Odessa: KUPRIENKO SV, 2013. S. 53.
Opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Delo ¹ 081-010-08. 4 marta 2010 g. http://dogovor-urist.ru/sudebnaya_praktika/delo/41-apu13-13sp/
Ishchenko P.P. Informatsionnoe obespechenie sledstvennoy deyatel'nosti. Avtoref. kand. diss. yurid. nauk. – M., 2009. – S.8.
Federal'nyy Zakon «O gosudarstvennoy grazhdanskoy sluzhbe Rossiyskoy Federatsii»», ot 27 iyulya 2004 g. ¹ 79.
Shapovalova G.M. Uchebnik kriminalistiki kak osnova znaniy o nauke kriminalistike (na primere uchebnika 2012 g. A.A. Toporkova) // Vestnik Sibirskogo instituta biznesa i informatsionnykh tekhnologiy. Nauchno-prakticheskiy zhurnal ¹ 4(16). Dekabr' 2015 g. – Omsk, 2015. – S.118.
Orover V.A. K problemam prepodavaniya kriminalistiki// Aktual'nye problemy ugolovnogo protsessa i kriminalistiki: nauchno-praktich. konf. Vladivostok, 10-11 aprelya 2015 g.; sbornik statey /[otv. red. A.F. Rekhovskiy, nauch. red. V.V. Yarovenko]. – Vladivostok: Izd-vo Dal'nevost. un-ta, 2015. – S.122-129.
Lyubichev S.G. Voprosy prepodavaniya kriminalistiki «Chernye dyry» v Rossiyskom zakonodatel'stve. ¹3, 2005. S.54.
Federal'nogo zakona «Ob obrazovanii v Rossiyskoy Federatsii» ot 29 dekabrya 2012 g. ¹ 273-FZ
Bakhin V. P., Karpov N. S. Sovremennye problemy kriminalisticheskoy podgotovki // Vestnik kriminalistiki / Otv. red. A. G. Filippov. Vyp. 2 (6). M.: Spark, 2003. S. 19.
Kriminalistika. Pod red. V. A. Obraztsova. M., 1995, s. 7.
Bakhin V. P. Kriminalisticheskaya kharakteristika prestupleniy kak element rassledovaniya // Vestnik kriminalistiki / Otv. red. A. G. Filippov. Vyp. 1. M.: Spark, 2000. S. 16.
Matusovskiy G. A. Kriminalistika v sisteme yuridicheskikh nauk i ee mezhnauchnye svyazi. Avtoref. dis. ... dokt. yurid. nauk. M:, 1980, s. 17.
Koldin V. Ya.. Sotsialisticheskaya kriminalistika. M., 1986. S. 3-19.
Belkin R. S. Obshchaya teoriya sovetskoy kriminalistiki. Saratov, 1986. S. 12.
Krasnobaev Yu. I. Ponyatie predmeta sovetskoy kriminalistiki (istoriya i sovremennoe sostoyanie problemy). Avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. M., 1976, s. 17.
Belkin R. S. Kriminalistika: problemy, tendentsii, perspektivy. Obshchaya i chastnye teorii. M., 1987. S. 43.
Kriminalistika (pod red. R.S. Belkina i dr.). Uchebnik dlya vuzov MVD, t. 1. M., 1995. S. 64.
Tanasevich V. G. O predmete sovetskoy kriminalistiki (v poryadke obsuzhdeniya). // Voprosy bor'by s prestupnost'yu. M., 1976, vyp. 24,. S. 109.
Sokol V. Yu. Sovremennye podkhody k opredeleniyu predmeta kriminalistiki // Obshchestvo i pravo, 2009, ¹ 2. S. 43.
Belkin R. S., Krasnobaev Yu. I. O predmete sovetskoy kriminalistiki // Pravovedenie. 1967. ¹ 4. S. 94.
Panteleev I. F. Teoreticheskie problemy sovetskoy kriminalistiki. M., 1980, s. 4.
Belkin R.S. Kriminalistika. Tom 1. Obshchaya teoriya kriminalistiki. M.: Yurist, 1997. http://www.pravoznavec.com.ua/books/letter/226/%C1/23017
Churilov S.N. O nauchnom znanii ili «teorii zdravogo smysla» v kriminalistike / Biblioteka kriminalistika. Nauchnyy zhurnal. Vyp. 1 (24). – M., 2016. – S. 231.
Korma V.D., Obraztsov V.A. Problemy sovershenstvovaniya paradigmy kriminalistiki kak teorii zdravogo smysla / Vestnik kriminalistiki. Vyp. 2 (46). – M.: Spark, 2013. – S. 17.
Instruktsiya o poryadke ispol'zovaniya poligrafa pri oprose grazhdan (Minyust N 771 06.01.1995) http://docs.cntd.ru/document/9037963
Pakhomov A.V. Kollektsii v pravookhranitel'nykh organakh Rossii.-M.: OOO Izdatel'stvo «Yurlitinform», 2001. S. 34-35.
Poleshchuk O.V. Formirovanie i ispol'zovanie kriminalisticheskikh kollektsiy v raskrytii i rassledovanii prestupleniy: monografiya. – M.: «Yurlitinform», 2011. S. 65-68.

References (transliteration):
Kvyk A. V., Filatov S. N. Dokazatel'stvennoe znachenie zaklyucheniya ol'faktornoy sudebnoy ekspertizy po materialam sudebnoy praktiki Primorskogo kraya // Aktual'nye problemy ugolovnogo protsessa i kriminalistiki: sbornik statey nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, Vladivostok, 10–11 aprelya 2015 g. / [otv. red. A.F. Rekhovskiy; nauch. red. V.V. Yarovenko]. – Vladivostok: Izd-vo Dal'nevost. un-ta, 2015. – S. 86-87.
Starovoytov V.I. Sudebnaya ol'faktornaya ekspertiza sledov pakhnushchikh veshchestv iz krovi i pota cheloveka // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2011. ¹ 12. – S. 75.
Kulieva R.O. Sovremennaya kriminalistika: odorologiya ili ol'faktronika? http://static.bsu.az/w8/Xeberler%20Jurnali/Sosial%202011%201/79-87.pdf
Osmanov T. Yu. Primenenie metoda slovesnogo portreta v sledstvennoy i operativnoy deyatel'nosti (Metodologicheskie i psikhologicheskie aspekty problemy): Dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2000. – S. 121-122.
Yarovenko V.V. Protsessual'naya fiksatsiya materialov, poluchennykh s primeneniem spetsial'nykh tekhnicheskikh sredstv, rabotayushchikh v avtomaticheskom rezhime //Perspektivnye innovatsii v nauke, obrazovanii, proizvodstve i transporte ‘2014,– Odessa: KUPRIENKO SV, 2014. S. 54-56. http://www.orgcom@sworld.com.ua
Yarovenko V.V., Poleshchuk O.V. Pribory videonablyudeniya i videoregistratory kak istochniki informatsii o sobytii. Sovremennye problemy i puti ikh resheniya v nauke, transporte, proizvodstve i obrazovanii '2014 // Sbornik nauchnykh trudov SWorld . Vypusk 2. Tom 30. – Odessa: KUPRIENKO CV, 2014. – C.22-25.
Yarovenko V.V., Tekhniko-kriminalisticheskoe obespechenie fiksatsii khoda i rezul'tatov sledstvennogo deystviya //Sbornik nauchnykh trudov SWorld. – Vypusk 3. Tom 32. – Odessa: KUPRIENKO SV, 2013 – S. 47-50.
Yarovenko V.V., Poleshchuk O.V.Poluchenie informatsii s sistem videonablyudeniya i videoregistratorov (soav.)// Sovremennye problemy i puti ikh resheniya v nauke, transporte, proizvodstve i obrazovanii 2013". – Odessa: KUPRIENKO SV, 2013. S. 53.
Opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Delo ¹ 081-010-08. 4 marta 2010 g. http://dogovor-urist.ru/sudebnaya_praktika/delo/41-apu13-13sp/
Ishchenko P.P. Informatsionnoe obespechenie sledstvennoy deyatel'nosti. Avtoref. kand. diss. yurid. nauk. – M., 2009. – S.8.
Federal'nyy Zakon «O gosudarstvennoy grazhdanskoy sluzhbe Rossiyskoy Federatsii»», ot 27 iyulya 2004 g. ¹ 79.
Shapovalova G.M. Uchebnik kriminalistiki kak osnova znaniy o nauke kriminalistike (na primere uchebnika 2012 g. A.A. Toporkova) // Vestnik Sibirskogo instituta biznesa i informatsionnykh tekhnologiy. Nauchno-prakticheskiy zhurnal ¹ 4(16). Dekabr' 2015 g. – Omsk, 2015. – S.118.
Orover V.A. K problemam prepodavaniya kriminalistiki// Aktual'nye problemy ugolovnogo protsessa i kriminalistiki: nauchno-praktich. konf. Vladivostok, 10-11 aprelya 2015 g.; sbornik statey /[otv. red. A.F. Rekhovskiy, nauch. red. V.V. Yarovenko]. – Vladivostok: Izd-vo Dal'nevost. un-ta, 2015. – S.122-129.
Lyubichev S.G. Voprosy prepodavaniya kriminalistiki «Chernye dyry» v Rossiyskom zakonodatel'stve. ¹3, 2005. S.54.
Federal'nogo zakona «Ob obrazovanii v Rossiyskoy Federatsii» ot 29 dekabrya 2012 g. ¹ 273-FZ
Bakhin V. P., Karpov N. S. Sovremennye problemy kriminalisticheskoy podgotovki // Vestnik kriminalistiki / Otv. red. A. G. Filippov. Vyp. 2 (6). M.: Spark, 2003. S. 19.
Kriminalistika. Pod red. V. A. Obraztsova. M., 1995, s. 7.
Bakhin V. P. Kriminalisticheskaya kharakteristika prestupleniy kak element rassledovaniya // Vestnik kriminalistiki / Otv. red. A. G. Filippov. Vyp. 1. M.: Spark, 2000. S. 16.
Matusovskiy G. A. Kriminalistika v sisteme yuridicheskikh nauk i ee mezhnauchnye svyazi. Avtoref. dis. ... dokt. yurid. nauk. M:, 1980, s. 17.
Koldin V. Ya.. Sotsialisticheskaya kriminalistika. M., 1986. S. 3-19.
Belkin R. S. Obshchaya teoriya sovetskoy kriminalistiki. Saratov, 1986. S. 12.
Krasnobaev Yu. I. Ponyatie predmeta sovetskoy kriminalistiki (istoriya i sovremennoe sostoyanie problemy). Avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. M., 1976, s. 17.
Belkin R. S. Kriminalistika: problemy, tendentsii, perspektivy. Obshchaya i chastnye teorii. M., 1987. S. 43.
Kriminalistika (pod red. R.S. Belkina i dr.). Uchebnik dlya vuzov MVD, t. 1. M., 1995. S. 64.
Tanasevich V. G. O predmete sovetskoy kriminalistiki (v poryadke obsuzhdeniya). // Voprosy bor'by s prestupnost'yu. M., 1976, vyp. 24,. S. 109.
Sokol V. Yu. Sovremennye podkhody k opredeleniyu predmeta kriminalistiki // Obshchestvo i pravo, 2009, ¹ 2. S. 43.
Belkin R. S., Krasnobaev Yu. I. O predmete sovetskoy kriminalistiki // Pravovedenie. 1967. ¹ 4. S. 94.
Panteleev I. F. Teoreticheskie problemy sovetskoy kriminalistiki. M., 1980, s. 4.
Belkin R.S. Kriminalistika. Tom 1. Obshchaya teoriya kriminalistiki. M.: Yurist, 1997. http://www.pravoznavec.com.ua/books/letter/226/%C1/23017
Churilov S.N. O nauchnom znanii ili «teorii zdravogo smysla» v kriminalistike / Biblioteka kriminalistika. Nauchnyy zhurnal. Vyp. 1 (24). – M., 2016. – S. 231.
Korma V.D., Obraztsov V.A. Problemy sovershenstvovaniya paradigmy kriminalistiki kak teorii zdravogo smysla / Vestnik kriminalistiki. Vyp. 2 (46). – M.: Spark, 2013. – S. 17.
Instruktsiya o poryadke ispol'zovaniya poligrafa pri oprose grazhdan (Minyust N 771 06.01.1995) http://docs.cntd.ru/document/9037963
Pakhomov A.V. Kollektsii v pravookhranitel'nykh organakh Rossii.-M.: OOO Izdatel'stvo «Yurlitinform», 2001. S. 34-35.
Poleshchuk O.V. Formirovanie i ispol'zovanie kriminalisticheskikh kollektsiy v raskrytii i rassledovanii prestupleniy: monografiya. – M.: «Yurlitinform», 2011. S. 65-68.

Review: The research object is investigation and detection of crimes committed in the sphere of information and telecommunication technologies. The research subject includes the main features of computer information as an object of forensic processing. The author analyzes the concepts of the nature of computer information and the process of its generating, and enumerates the main forms of its presenting. The author outlines the methods of work with computer information and traces of cybercrimes. Computer information as an object of forensic processing is considered as an object of criminal infringement, an instrument of crime, an evidence, and one of the forms of traces of cybercrimes. The author applies general and specific scientific research methods, including analogy, deduction, comparison, the system analysis, and the methods of formal logic, prognostication, and the interparadigmatic approach. Forensic processing of computer information is provided in the subsection of digital forensic services and the section of criminal investigation technique. At the same time, computer information and technologies are applied in other branches of the science: its fundamentals, tactics, and methodology. Thus the scientific novelty of the research lies in the conclusion about the need for a theoretical explanation and consolidation of application of information technologies in the process of detection and investigation of crimes, in other words, empirical knowledge, as the fundamentals of forensic processing of computer information. The author formulates the concepts of information in the sphere of telecommunication technologies, and the traces of crimes in the sphere of computer information. The author suggests the directions of development of forensic instruments used in the process of investigation and detection of cybercrimes. The research results can be applied for forming the theory of criminalistics, in investigation and detection of crimes and forensic expertise in the sphere of computer information, for teaching students, undergraduates and postgraduates in the criminalistics discipline. 

References:
Basiladze S.G. Infologiya-signal, sostoyaniya, dannye, informatsiya. Vtoroe dopolnennoe izdanie. M.: Editus, 2015. – 358 s.
Beloglazov E.G. Informatsionnye tekhnologii i analiticheskie modeli kriminal'nykh protsessov i yavleniy: Monografiya. M.: Moskovskiy universitet MVD Rossii, 2005. – 210 s.
Gaydamakin A.A., Gorev A.I., Kosorotov A.P., Chuyanov A.G. Informatsionnaya bezopasnost' v organakh vnutrennikh del i primenenie informatsionnykh tekhnologiy v bor'be s prestupnost'yu. Omsk: Omskaya akademiya MVD Rossii, 2010 g. – 740 s.
Zigura N.A., Kudryavtseva A.V. Komp'yuternaya informatsiya kak vid dokazatel'stv v ugolovnom protsesse Rossii: Monografiya. M.: Yurlitinform, 2011 g. – 176 s.
Efremov D.A. Nauchnye i pravovye osnovy ispol'zovaniya informatsii pri rassledovanii prestupleniy: monografiya. M.: Yurlitinform, 2014. – 168 s.
Kosynkin A.A. Preodolenie protivodeystviya rassledovaniyu prestupleniy v sfere komp'yuternoy informatsii: monografiya. M.: Yurlitinform, 2013. – 216 s.
Kriminalistika: informatsionnye tekhnologii dokazyvaniya. Uchebnik dlya vuzov / pod red. V.Ya. Koldina. M.: Zertsalo-M, 2007. – 752 s.
Lapin E.S. Filosofiya kriminalistiki: uchebnoe posobie. Saratov: «Nauchnaya kniga», 2016. – 146 s.
Morozov V.K., Ostroushko A.V. Metodika rassledovaniya informatsionnykh prestupleniy, predmetom posyagatel'stva kotorykh yavlyaetsya okhranyaemaya gosudarstvom informatsiya, vklyuchennaya v oborot posredstvom komp'yuternykh informatsionnykh tekhnologiy: ucheb. posobie. M.: Poligraf-Informm, 2009. – 152 s.
Narizhnyy A.V., Pikhov A.Kh.-A. Ispol'zovanie spetsial'nykh poznaniy pri raskrytii i rassledovanii prestupleniy v sfere vysokikh tekhnologiy: uchebno-prakticheskoe posobie. Krasnodar: Krasnodarskiy universitet MVD Rossii, 2014. – 62 s.
Poleshchuk O.V., Shapovalova G.M. Kriminalisticheskoe issledovanie sledov pri rassledovanii komp'yuternykh prestupleniy: Monografiya. Vladivostok: Izd-vo Dal'nevostochnogo Universiteta, 2006 g. – 157 s.
Protivodeystvie prestupleniyam v sfere informatsionnykh tekhnologiy. Materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii 23.05.2013 g. Belgorod: Belgorodskiy yuridicheskiy institut MVD Rossii, 2013 g. – 204 s.
Slovar' po kriminalistike. 1250 terminov i opredeleniy / avt.-sost. A.M. Bagmet i dr.; pod red. A.I. Bastrykina. – M.: YuNITI-DANA, 2015. – 383 s.
Tekhniko-kriminalisticheskoe soprovozhdenie rassledovaniya prestupleniy: ucheb. posobie / pod red. kand. yur. nauk A.M. Bagmeta. – M.: Yurlitinform, 2016. – 256 s.
Tushkanova O.V. Terminologicheskiy spravochnik sudebnoy komp'yuternoy ekspertizy: spravochnoe posobie. M.: MAKS Press, 2005 g. – 260 s.
Fedotov N.N. Forenzika-komp'yuternaya kriminalistika. M.: Yuridicheskiy mir, 2007. – 360 s.
Tsarev R.Yu., Prokopenko A.V., Knyaz'kov A.N. Programmnye i apparatnye sredstva informatiki: ucheb. Krasnoyarsk: Sibirskiy federal'nyy universitet, 2015. – 160 s

References (transliteration):
Basiladze S.G. Infologiya-signal, sostoyaniya, dannye, informatsiya. Vtoroe dopolnennoe izdanie. M.: Editus, 2015. – 358 s.
Beloglazov E.G. Informatsionnye tekhnologii i analiticheskie modeli kriminal'nykh protsessov i yavleniy: Monografiya. M.: Moskovskiy universitet MVD Rossii, 2005. – 210 s.
Gaydamakin A.A., Gorev A.I., Kosorotov A.P., Chuyanov A.G. Informatsionnaya bezopasnost' v organakh vnutrennikh del i primenenie informatsionnykh tekhnologiy v bor'be s prestupnost'yu. Omsk: Omskaya akademiya MVD Rossii, 2010 g. – 740 s.
Zigura N.A., Kudryavtseva A.V. Komp'yuternaya informatsiya kak vid dokazatel'stv v ugolovnom protsesse Rossii: Monografiya. M.: Yurlitinform, 2011 g. – 176 s.
Efremov D.A. Nauchnye i pravovye osnovy ispol'zovaniya informatsii pri rassledovanii prestupleniy: monografiya. M.: Yurlitinform, 2014. – 168 s.
Kosynkin A.A. Preodolenie protivodeystviya rassledovaniyu prestupleniy v sfere komp'yuternoy informatsii: monografiya. M.: Yurlitinform, 2013. – 216 s.
Kriminalistika: informatsionnye tekhnologii dokazyvaniya. Uchebnik dlya vuzov / pod red. V.Ya. Koldina. M.: Zertsalo-M, 2007. – 752 s.
Lapin E.S. Filosofiya kriminalistiki: uchebnoe posobie. Saratov: «Nauchnaya kniga», 2016. – 146 s.
Morozov V.K., Ostroushko A.V. Metodika rassledovaniya informatsionnykh prestupleniy, predmetom posyagatel'stva kotorykh yavlyaetsya okhranyaemaya gosudarstvom informatsiya, vklyuchennaya v oborot posredstvom komp'yuternykh informatsionnykh tekhnologiy: ucheb. posobie. M.: Poligraf-Informm, 2009. – 152 s.
Narizhnyy A.V., Pikhov A.Kh.-A. Ispol'zovanie spetsial'nykh poznaniy pri raskrytii i rassledovanii prestupleniy v sfere vysokikh tekhnologiy: uchebno-prakticheskoe posobie. Krasnodar: Krasnodarskiy universitet MVD Rossii, 2014. – 62 s.
Poleshchuk O.V., Shapovalova G.M. Kriminalisticheskoe issledovanie sledov pri rassledovanii komp'yuternykh prestupleniy: Monografiya. Vladivostok: Izd-vo Dal'nevostochnogo Universiteta, 2006 g. – 157 s.
Protivodeystvie prestupleniyam v sfere informatsionnykh tekhnologiy. Materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii 23.05.2013 g. Belgorod: Belgorodskiy yuridicheskiy institut MVD Rossii, 2013 g. – 204 s.
Slovar' po kriminalistike. 1250 terminov i opredeleniy / avt.-sost. A.M. Bagmet i dr.; pod red. A.I. Bastrykina. – M.: YuNITI-DANA, 2015. – 383 s.
Tekhniko-kriminalisticheskoe soprovozhdenie rassledovaniya prestupleniy: ucheb. posobie / pod red. kand. yur. nauk A.M. Bagmeta. – M.: Yurlitinform, 2016. – 256 s.
Tushkanova O.V. Terminologicheskiy spravochnik sudebnoy komp'yuternoy ekspertizy: spravochnoe posobie. M.: MAKS Press, 2005 g. – 260 s.
Fedotov N.N. Forenzika-komp'yuternaya kriminalistika. M.: Yuridicheskiy mir, 2007. – 360 s.
Tsarev R.Yu., Prokopenko A.V., Knyaz'kov A.N. Programmnye i apparatnye sredstva informatiki: ucheb. Krasnoyarsk: Sibirskiy federal'nyy universitet, 2015. – 160 s

Review: The authors consider scientific studies and expert practice on the problems of expert mistakes and their solution. The authors pay attention to expert’s competence and expert’s initiative, expert’s report about the questions, which can be solved without special knowledge. The expert has touched upon legal issues and based his conclusions not on the results of the study, but on the materials of the case. The analysis of the current condition allows concluding that expert mistakes should be considered in terms of particular expert situations. The study had been carried out in the period from 2000 till 2015. The authors analyze theoretical and empirical researches of other authors. The research methodology is based on the analysis of statutory acts, the doctrine and the practice of expertise. Significant attention is paid to the method of interpretation. The authors conclude that in cases when the expert falls beyond his competence, touches the issues of legal nature, provides opinion on the questions which can be solved without special knowledge, substantiates his opinion by the materials of the case, without considering particular expert situations, his opinion should not be considered as an expert mistake. 

Keywords: expert situation, special knowledge, questions, initiative, expert competence, types of mistakes, expert mistake, investigator, method, conclusion

References:
Yarovenko V.V., Yarovenko T.V. Problemy ekspertizy ognestrel'nogo i kholodnogo oruzhiya // Pravo i politika. ¹ 4 (112). 2010. S. 53.
Yarovenko V.V. Kholodnoe oruzhie kak ob'ekt kriminalisticheskogo issledovaniya // Vestnik UVD po Primorskomu krayu. ¹3 (9), 2009. S. 82.
Tikhonov E.N. Kriminalisticheskaya ekspertiza kholodnogo oruzhiya: Uchebnoe posobie. – Barnaul, Izd-vo AGU, 1983. S. 63.
Yarovenko V.V. K voprosu o primenenii spetsial'nykh znaniy pri issledovanii oruzhiya, patronov i sledov vystrela // Protivodeystvie organizovannoy prestupnosti: ugolovno-protsessual'nye i kriminalisticheskie aspekty bor'by s torgovley lyud'mi, nezakonnym oborotom narkotikov i oruzhiya, ekologicheskimi prestupleniyami: Materialy mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii, posvyashchennoy 10-letiyu kafedry ugolovnogo protsessa, kriminalistiki i pravovoy informatiki RGU im. I. Kanta / Pod. red. T.S. Volchetskoy. – Kaliningrad: Izd-vo RGU im. I. Kanta, 2008.
Zaklyuchenie eksperta ¹ 1737 ot 12 dekabrya 2005 g. Arkhiv EKTs UVD PK za 2005 god.
Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks Turetskoy Respubliki: perevod s turetskogo / [nauch. red. V.A. Orover]; [ per. R.S. Bagirzade]. Vladivostok: Izd-vo Dal'nevost. un-ta, 2015.
Yablokov N. Vozmozhnosti ekspertizy po tekhnike bezopasnosti i ee naznachenie // Sovetskaya yustitsiya. ¹16. 1964. S. 63.
Romanov N.S. O vozmozhnosti resheniya voprosa o narushenii pravil dvizheniya sudebnoy avtotekhnicheskoy ekspertizoy // Problemy sudebnoy ekspertizy. Vyp. 4. – M., 1961. S. 76.
Instruktsiya o proizvodstve sudebnykh avtotekhnicheskikh ekspertiz v ekspertnykh uchrezhdeniyakh sistemy Ministerstva yustitsii SSSR, utverzhdennoy Prikazom Minyusta SSSR ot 26 oktyabrya 1981 goda ¹20 (izm. i dop. na 12 oktyabrya 2006 g.).
Zaklyuchenie eksperta ot 22 avgusta 2006 goda. Arkhiv EKTs UVD Primorskogo kraya g. Vladivostoka.
Zaklyuchenie eksperta ¹175 ot 19 marta 2003 goda. Arkhiv EKU UVD PK za 2003 god.
Yarovenko V.V. Primenenie spetsial'nykh znaniy pri issledovanii ob'ektov sudebnoy ballistiki (obzor praktiki) // Pravo i politika ¹4, 2012. S. 13.
Shklyar B.M. Nekotorye voprosy pravootnosheniy sledovatelya i eksperta pri proizvodstve sudebnoy ekspertizy // Ekspertiza pri rassledovanii prestupleniy (informatsionnye materialy). Vyp. 10. – Vil'nyus, 1972. S. 87.
Shlyakhov A.R. Sudebnaya ekspertiza: organizatsiya i provedenie.-M.: Yurid. lit., 1979. S. 93.
Petrukhin I.L. Ekspertiza kak sredstvo dokazyvaniya v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse. – M., 1964. S. 32.
Shlyakhov A.R. Voprosy sudebnoy ekspertizy v novom UPK RSFSR // Sovetskaya yustitsiya, ¹1, 1961. S. 71.
Moryashova N.A. Problemy kriminalisticheskoy taktiki v usloviyakh sostyazatel'nosti storon. Diss. kand. yurid. nauk.-Vladivostok, 2004.
Sayfiev R.I., Yarovenko V.V. Teoriya i praktika sovershenstvovaniya sredstv obnaruzheniya i fiksatsii nevidimykh sledov ruk: Ucheb. posobie. – Vladivostok: Izd-vo Dal'nevost. un-ta, 1994. S. 52.
Paliashvili A.Ya Ekspertiza v sude po ugolovnym delam. – M.: Yurid. lit., 1973. S. 64.
Novikov V. N. K voprosu ob ekspertnoy initsiative na stadii predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya // Aktual'nye voprosy pravovedeniya. Vyp. 11. – Tomsk, 1978. S. 71.
Mel'nik S.L.. Aktual'nye voprosy ekspertnoy initsiativy. Avtoref. kand. yurid. nauk. – Chelyabinsk, 2005. http://www.dissercat.com/content/aktualnye-voprosy-ekspertnoi-initsiativy#ixzz3LOYBRSeE. Data obrashcheniya 12.12.2015 g.
Zaklyuchenie mediko-kriminalisticheskoy ekspertizy ¹ 143-MK ot 26.05.11 g. Arkhiv byuro sudebno-meditsinskoy ekspertizy po Primorskomu krayu za 2011 god.
Voronin S.E, Ugolovno-protsessual'naya situatsiya kak raznovidnost' sledstvennoy situatsii // Problemy ispol'zovaniya kriminalisticheskikh znaniy v pravookhranitel'noy deyatel'nosti: materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchnoy konferentsii, posvyashchennoy 30-letiyu kafedry kriminalistiki YuI TGU / pod. red.N.S. Dergacha. – Tomsk: Izdatel'skiy Dom TGU, 2014. S. 42.
Krasnobaeva A.Yu. Ekspertnye oshibki, prichiny, posledstviya, profilaktika: avtoref. dis…kand. yurid. nauk. – Volgograd, 1997.
Aubakirova A.A.Sledstvennye i ekspertnye oshibki pri formirovanii vnutrennego ubezhdeniya. Avtoref. dokt. diss. yurid. nauk. – Chelyabinsk, 2010. http://lawtheses.com/sledstvennye-i-ekspertnye-oshibki-pri-formirovanii-vnutrennego-ubezhdeniya#ixzz3LOKaxG1s. Data obrashcheniya 12.12.2015 g.
Granovskiy G.L. Priroda, prichiny ekspertnykh oshibok i puti ikh ustraneniya // Novye razrabotki i diskussionnye problemy teorii i praktiki sudebnoy ekspertizy. – M., 1983. S. 45.
Kudryavtseva A.V. Vnutrennee ubezhdenie eksperta i ego rol' v protsesse ekspertnogo issledovaniya./A.V. Kudryavtseva //Aktual'nye voprosy ugolovnogo protsessa sovremennoy Rossii: Mezhvuz. sb. nauchn. tr. Ufa. 2003. S. 91.
Pravila proizvodstva sudebno-meditsinskikh ekspertiz v mediko-kriminalisticheskikh otdeleniyakh laboratoriy byuro sudebno-meditsinskoy ekspertizy (soglasovano s General'noy Prokuraturoy RF, Verkhovnym Sudom RF, Ministerstvom vnutrennikh del RF). Prikazom Minzdrava RF ot 14 sentyabrya 2001 g. ¹ 361 utratili silu.
Prigovor Pervomayskogo rayonnogo suda g. Vladivostoka ot 28 marta 2011 goda po delu ¹ 1-42/11.
Prigovor Pervomayskogo rayonnogo suda g. Vladivostoka ot 3 maya 2011 goda po delu ¹ 1-45/11.

References (transliteration):
Yarovenko V.V., Yarovenko T.V. Problemy ekspertizy ognestrel'nogo i kholodnogo oruzhiya // Pravo i politika. ¹ 4 (112). 2010. S. 53.
Yarovenko V.V. Kholodnoe oruzhie kak ob'ekt kriminalisticheskogo issledovaniya // Vestnik UVD po Primorskomu krayu. ¹3 (9), 2009. S. 82.
Tikhonov E.N. Kriminalisticheskaya ekspertiza kholodnogo oruzhiya: Uchebnoe posobie. – Barnaul, Izd-vo AGU, 1983. S. 63.
Yarovenko V.V. K voprosu o primenenii spetsial'nykh znaniy pri issledovanii oruzhiya, patronov i sledov vystrela // Protivodeystvie organizovannoy prestupnosti: ugolovno-protsessual'nye i kriminalisticheskie aspekty bor'by s torgovley lyud'mi, nezakonnym oborotom narkotikov i oruzhiya, ekologicheskimi prestupleniyami: Materialy mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii, posvyashchennoy 10-letiyu kafedry ugolovnogo protsessa, kriminalistiki i pravovoy informatiki RGU im. I. Kanta / Pod. red. T.S. Volchetskoy. – Kaliningrad: Izd-vo RGU im. I. Kanta, 2008.
Zaklyuchenie eksperta ¹ 1737 ot 12 dekabrya 2005 g. Arkhiv EKTs UVD PK za 2005 god.
Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks Turetskoy Respubliki: perevod s turetskogo / [nauch. red. V.A. Orover]; [ per. R.S. Bagirzade]. Vladivostok: Izd-vo Dal'nevost. un-ta, 2015.
Yablokov N. Vozmozhnosti ekspertizy po tekhnike bezopasnosti i ee naznachenie // Sovetskaya yustitsiya. ¹16. 1964. S. 63.
Romanov N.S. O vozmozhnosti resheniya voprosa o narushenii pravil dvizheniya sudebnoy avtotekhnicheskoy ekspertizoy // Problemy sudebnoy ekspertizy. Vyp. 4. – M., 1961. S. 76.
Instruktsiya o proizvodstve sudebnykh avtotekhnicheskikh ekspertiz v ekspertnykh uchrezhdeniyakh sistemy Ministerstva yustitsii SSSR, utverzhdennoy Prikazom Minyusta SSSR ot 26 oktyabrya 1981 goda ¹20 (izm. i dop. na 12 oktyabrya 2006 g.).
Zaklyuchenie eksperta ot 22 avgusta 2006 goda. Arkhiv EKTs UVD Primorskogo kraya g. Vladivostoka.
Zaklyuchenie eksperta ¹175 ot 19 marta 2003 goda. Arkhiv EKU UVD PK za 2003 god.
Yarovenko V.V. Primenenie spetsial'nykh znaniy pri issledovanii ob'ektov sudebnoy ballistiki (obzor praktiki) // Pravo i politika ¹4, 2012. S. 13.
Shklyar B.M. Nekotorye voprosy pravootnosheniy sledovatelya i eksperta pri proizvodstve sudebnoy ekspertizy // Ekspertiza pri rassledovanii prestupleniy (informatsionnye materialy). Vyp. 10. – Vil'nyus, 1972. S. 87.
Shlyakhov A.R. Sudebnaya ekspertiza: organizatsiya i provedenie.-M.: Yurid. lit., 1979. S. 93.
Petrukhin I.L. Ekspertiza kak sredstvo dokazyvaniya v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse. – M., 1964. S. 32.
Shlyakhov A.R. Voprosy sudebnoy ekspertizy v novom UPK RSFSR // Sovetskaya yustitsiya, ¹1, 1961. S. 71.
Moryashova N.A. Problemy kriminalisticheskoy taktiki v usloviyakh sostyazatel'nosti storon. Diss. kand. yurid. nauk.-Vladivostok, 2004.
Sayfiev R.I., Yarovenko V.V. Teoriya i praktika sovershenstvovaniya sredstv obnaruzheniya i fiksatsii nevidimykh sledov ruk: Ucheb. posobie. – Vladivostok: Izd-vo Dal'nevost. un-ta, 1994. S. 52.
Paliashvili A.Ya Ekspertiza v sude po ugolovnym delam. – M.: Yurid. lit., 1973. S. 64.
Novikov V. N. K voprosu ob ekspertnoy initsiative na stadii predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya // Aktual'nye voprosy pravovedeniya. Vyp. 11. – Tomsk, 1978. S. 71.
Mel'nik S.L.. Aktual'nye voprosy ekspertnoy initsiativy. Avtoref. kand. yurid. nauk. – Chelyabinsk, 2005. http://www.dissercat.com/content/aktualnye-voprosy-ekspertnoi-initsiativy#ixzz3LOYBRSeE. Data obrashcheniya 12.12.2015 g.
Zaklyuchenie mediko-kriminalisticheskoy ekspertizy ¹ 143-MK ot 26.05.11 g. Arkhiv byuro sudebno-meditsinskoy ekspertizy po Primorskomu krayu za 2011 god.
Voronin S.E, Ugolovno-protsessual'naya situatsiya kak raznovidnost' sledstvennoy situatsii // Problemy ispol'zovaniya kriminalisticheskikh znaniy v pravookhranitel'noy deyatel'nosti: materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchnoy konferentsii, posvyashchennoy 30-letiyu kafedry kriminalistiki YuI TGU / pod. red.N.S. Dergacha. – Tomsk: Izdatel'skiy Dom TGU, 2014. S. 42.
Krasnobaeva A.Yu. Ekspertnye oshibki, prichiny, posledstviya, profilaktika: avtoref. dis…kand. yurid. nauk. – Volgograd, 1997.
Aubakirova A.A.Sledstvennye i ekspertnye oshibki pri formirovanii vnutrennego ubezhdeniya. Avtoref. dokt. diss. yurid. nauk. – Chelyabinsk, 2010. http://lawtheses.com/sledstvennye-i-ekspertnye-oshibki-pri-formirovanii-vnutrennego-ubezhdeniya#ixzz3LOKaxG1s. Data obrashcheniya 12.12.2015 g.
Granovskiy G.L. Priroda, prichiny ekspertnykh oshibok i puti ikh ustraneniya // Novye razrabotki i diskussionnye problemy teorii i praktiki sudebnoy ekspertizy. – M., 1983. S. 45.
Kudryavtseva A.V. Vnutrennee ubezhdenie eksperta i ego rol' v protsesse ekspertnogo issledovaniya./A.V. Kudryavtseva //Aktual'nye voprosy ugolovnogo protsessa sovremennoy Rossii: Mezhvuz. sb. nauchn. tr. Ufa. 2003. S. 91.
Pravila proizvodstva sudebno-meditsinskikh ekspertiz v mediko-kriminalisticheskikh otdeleniyakh laboratoriy byuro sudebno-meditsinskoy ekspertizy (soglasovano s General'noy Prokuraturoy RF, Verkhovnym Sudom RF, Ministerstvom vnutrennikh del RF). Prikazom Minzdrava RF ot 14 sentyabrya 2001 g. ¹ 361 utratili silu.
Prigovor Pervomayskogo rayonnogo suda g. Vladivostoka ot 28 marta 2011 goda po delu ¹ 1-42/11.
Prigovor Pervomayskogo rayonnogo suda g. Vladivostoka ot 3 maya 2011 goda po delu ¹ 1-45/11.

Review: The author of the article considers the problems of law-enforcement agencies’ readiness to reveal, fix, and investigate new socially dangerous acts in the Internet cloud services. In the conditions of information society, IT play special role, along with information systems and telecommunication networks, including the Internet. They give the opportunity to create, store, process, and share the information on corporative, state, and international scale using cloud computing. The author emphasizes that cloud providers, interacting with cloud clients, get access to all the data of their clients, and, taking into account the complexity of technological processes and geographical position of cloud providers, can complicate the work of law-enforcement agencies, directed at detection, seizure, and preservation of information traces within procedural actions. In times of dynamic changes, the state needs increasing the quantum leap in scientific research, which is possible in terms of a new concept of scientific research; empirical model and rationalist doctrine of epistemology should be dynamically renewed. In the conclusion the author outlines the weakest points in fighting against new socially dangerous acts. It is supposed that, due to the spread of cloud computing, criminal activity will intensify. The author is convinced that the results of scientific research of criminal essence of socially dangerous acts and their testing in practice, using the modern technical and criminalistical means, will promote the prevention and effective investigation of crimes in the sphere of cloud computing. 

Keywords: Law, definitions, evidence, Internet, cloud service, cloud computing, criminalistics, information trace, investigation, standard

References:
Barkalov Yu.M., Podgotovka ekspertov po proizvodstvu komp'yuternykh sudebnykh ekspertiz [Elektronnyy resurs] : metodicheskie rekomendatsii / Yuriy Mikhaylovich Barkalov . – Voronezh : Voronezhskiy institut MVD Rossii (VorYuI MVD Rossii), 2013 . – 65 s.
Belova T.G., Pobezhenko I.I., Pobezhenko V.V. Analiz problem doveriya v oblachnykh tekhnologiyakh. Vostochno-Evropeyskiy zhurnal peredovykh tekhnologiy. Ukrainskaya Gosudarstvennaya Akademiya zheleznodorozhnogo transporta. UKRAINA. Khar'kov. ¹ 2 (62) tom 2. 2013. S. – 59-61.
O zashchite fizicheskikh lits pri avtomatizirovannoy obrabotke personal'nykh dannykh: Konventsiya (ETS N 108) [rus., angl.] (Zaklyuchena v g. Strasburge 28.01.1981); // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 3 fevralya 2014 g. N 5. St. 419; O ratifikatsii konventsii soveta evropy o zashchite fizicheskikh lits pri avtomatizirovannoy obrabotke personal'nykh dannykh: Federal'nyy zakon ot 19 dekabrya 2005 g. N 160-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 26.12.2005, N 52 (chast' I) st. 5573.
Peskova O.Yu., Stepovaya K.E. Osobennosti analiza informatsionnoy bezopasnosti oblachnykh sistem. Izvestiya Yuzhnogo federal'nogo universiteta. Tekhnicheskie nauki. Vypusk ¹ 12 (149). 2013. S. – 39-47.
Prudnikova A.A. Bezopasnost' oblachnykh vychisleniy. Zhurnal Mir Telekoma. Oblachnye tekhnologii. ¹1. 2013. S. 50-55; http://mirtelecoma.ru/magazine/pechatnaya-versiya/.
Rossinskaya, E.R., Usov A.I. Sudebnaya komp'yuterno-tekhnicheskaya ekspertiza. – M.: Pravo i zakon, (Seriya «Prakticheskaya yurisprudentsiya. Sudebnaya ekspertiza») 2001. – 416 s.
Tregubov S.N. Osnovy ugolovnoy tekhniki. Nauchno-tekhnicheskie priemy rassledovaniya prestupleniy. Petrograd, izdanie yuridicheskogo knizhnogo sklada. Pravo, 1915.-334 s.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13.06.1996 N 63-FZ (red. ot 13.07.2015, s izm. ot 16.07.2015) (s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 25.07.2015) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 17.06.1996, N 25, st. 2954.
Fedotov, N.N., Forenzika-komp'yuternaya kriminalistika-M.: Yuridicheskiy Mir, 2007. — 432 s.
Peter Mel I, Timothy Grance. NIST Special Publication 800-145. The NIST Definition of cloud com¬puting. 2011. 3 p.; The National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST. DateViews 10.10.2015 http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800-145/SP800-145.pdf.
http://www.cnews.ru/reviews/cloud_2014/articles/rossijskie_oblaka_ne_razmenivayutsya_po_melocham (data dostupa 10.10.2015).
http://www.oxygen-forensic.com/en/ (data dostupa 10.10.2015).
http://forensicservices.ru/, (data dostupa 10.10.2015).
http://www.group-ib.ru/, (data dostupa 10.10.2015).
http://www.slideshare.net/AmazonWebServices/modern-it-governance-through-transparency-and-automation (data dostupa 10.10.2015).
http://www.amadeus.ru/about/index.htm (data dostupa 10.10.2015).
http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-cloud-computing/pub/CloudComputing/ForumVIIIAgenda/3-1-0950-overview-CC_Wksp2015_Overview_Herman.pdf.
http://expert.ru/northwest/2014/06/delovyie-oblaka/ (data dostupa 10.10.2015).
A. V. Tsaregorodtsev Kritichnye voprosy operativnogo i organizatsionno-tekhnicheskogo upravleniya informatsionnoy bezopasnost'yu oblachnykh vychisleniy // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2011. - 6. - C. 11 - 17.
Tsaregorodtsev A.V., Ermoshkin G.N. Bazovye printsipy postroeniya dereva tseley informatsionnoy bezopasnosti sredy oblachnykh vychisleniy // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2013. - 5. - C. 69 - 79. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2013.5.9583.
Tsaregorodtsev A.V. Postroenie derev'ev tseley dlya identifikatsii trebovaniy bezopasnosti sredy oblachnykh vychisleniy // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2013. - 5. - C. 51 - 68. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2013.5.9587.
A.V. Tsaregorodtsev, A.K. Kachko Odin iz podkhodov k modelirovaniyu marshruta
raspredeleniya obrabotki kritichnykh dannykh
v gibridnoy srede oblachnykh vychisleniy // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2012. - 5. - C. 43 - 49.
E. P. Ishchenko Rossiyskaya kriminalistika pervoy chetverti XXI veka: glavnye napravleniya razvitiya // Soyuz kriminalistov i kriminologov. - 2013. - 1. - C. 154 - 159.
Tsaregorodtsev A.V., Ermoshkin G.N. Model' otsenki riskov informatsionnoy bezopasnosti informatsionnykh sistem na osnove oblachnykh vychisleniy // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2013. - 6. - C. 46 - 54. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2013.6.9585.
Yarovenko V.V., Poleshchuk O.V. Spravochniki kak sostavnaya chast' obespecheniyakriminalisticheskoy informatsiey sledstvennoy deyatel'nosti // Pravo i politika. - 2014. - 12. - C. 1865 - 1870. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.12.13689.

References (transliteration):
Barkalov Yu.M., Podgotovka ekspertov po proizvodstvu komp'yuternykh sudebnykh ekspertiz [Elektronnyy resurs] : metodicheskie rekomendatsii / Yuriy Mikhaylovich Barkalov . – Voronezh : Voronezhskiy institut MVD Rossii (VorYuI MVD Rossii), 2013 . – 65 s.
Belova T.G., Pobezhenko I.I., Pobezhenko V.V. Analiz problem doveriya v oblachnykh tekhnologiyakh. Vostochno-Evropeyskiy zhurnal peredovykh tekhnologiy. Ukrainskaya Gosudarstvennaya Akademiya zheleznodorozhnogo transporta. UKRAINA. Khar'kov. ¹ 2 (62) tom 2. 2013. S. – 59-61.
O zashchite fizicheskikh lits pri avtomatizirovannoy obrabotke personal'nykh dannykh: Konventsiya (ETS N 108) [rus., angl.] (Zaklyuchena v g. Strasburge 28.01.1981); // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 3 fevralya 2014 g. N 5. St. 419; O ratifikatsii konventsii soveta evropy o zashchite fizicheskikh lits pri avtomatizirovannoy obrabotke personal'nykh dannykh: Federal'nyy zakon ot 19 dekabrya 2005 g. N 160-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 26.12.2005, N 52 (chast' I) st. 5573.
Peskova O.Yu., Stepovaya K.E. Osobennosti analiza informatsionnoy bezopasnosti oblachnykh sistem. Izvestiya Yuzhnogo federal'nogo universiteta. Tekhnicheskie nauki. Vypusk ¹ 12 (149). 2013. S. – 39-47.
Prudnikova A.A. Bezopasnost' oblachnykh vychisleniy. Zhurnal Mir Telekoma. Oblachnye tekhnologii. ¹1. 2013. S. 50-55; http://mirtelecoma.ru/magazine/pechatnaya-versiya/.
Rossinskaya, E.R., Usov A.I. Sudebnaya komp'yuterno-tekhnicheskaya ekspertiza. – M.: Pravo i zakon, (Seriya «Prakticheskaya yurisprudentsiya. Sudebnaya ekspertiza») 2001. – 416 s.
Tregubov S.N. Osnovy ugolovnoy tekhniki. Nauchno-tekhnicheskie priemy rassledovaniya prestupleniy. Petrograd, izdanie yuridicheskogo knizhnogo sklada. Pravo, 1915.-334 s.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13.06.1996 N 63-FZ (red. ot 13.07.2015, s izm. ot 16.07.2015) (s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 25.07.2015) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 17.06.1996, N 25, st. 2954.
Fedotov, N.N., Forenzika-komp'yuternaya kriminalistika-M.: Yuridicheskiy Mir, 2007. — 432 s.
Peter Mel I, Timothy Grance. NIST Special Publication 800-145. The NIST Definition of cloud com¬puting. 2011. 3 p.; The National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST. DateViews 10.10.2015 http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800-145/SP800-145.pdf.
http://www.cnews.ru/reviews/cloud_2014/articles/rossijskie_oblaka_ne_razmenivayutsya_po_melocham (data dostupa 10.10.2015).
http://www.oxygen-forensic.com/en/ (data dostupa 10.10.2015).
http://forensicservices.ru/, (data dostupa 10.10.2015).
http://www.group-ib.ru/, (data dostupa 10.10.2015).
http://www.slideshare.net/AmazonWebServices/modern-it-governance-through-transparency-and-automation (data dostupa 10.10.2015).
http://www.amadeus.ru/about/index.htm (data dostupa 10.10.2015).
http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-cloud-computing/pub/CloudComputing/ForumVIIIAgenda/3-1-0950-overview-CC_Wksp2015_Overview_Herman.pdf.
http://expert.ru/northwest/2014/06/delovyie-oblaka/ (data dostupa 10.10.2015).
A. V. Tsaregorodtsev Kritichnye voprosy operativnogo i organizatsionno-tekhnicheskogo upravleniya informatsionnoy bezopasnost'yu oblachnykh vychisleniy // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2011. - 6. - C. 11 - 17.
Tsaregorodtsev A.V., Ermoshkin G.N. Bazovye printsipy postroeniya dereva tseley informatsionnoy bezopasnosti sredy oblachnykh vychisleniy // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2013. - 5. - C. 69 - 79. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2013.5.9583.
Tsaregorodtsev A.V. Postroenie derev'ev tseley dlya identifikatsii trebovaniy bezopasnosti sredy oblachnykh vychisleniy // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2013. - 5. - C. 51 - 68. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2013.5.9587.
A.V. Tsaregorodtsev, A.K. Kachko Odin iz podkhodov k modelirovaniyu marshruta
raspredeleniya obrabotki kritichnykh dannykh
v gibridnoy srede oblachnykh vychisleniy // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2012. - 5. - C. 43 - 49.
E. P. Ishchenko Rossiyskaya kriminalistika pervoy chetverti XXI veka: glavnye napravleniya razvitiya // Soyuz kriminalistov i kriminologov. - 2013. - 1. - C. 154 - 159.
Tsaregorodtsev A.V., Ermoshkin G.N. Model' otsenki riskov informatsionnoy bezopasnosti informatsionnykh sistem na osnove oblachnykh vychisleniy // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2013. - 6. - C. 46 - 54. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2013.6.9585.
Yarovenko V.V., Poleshchuk O.V. Spravochniki kak sostavnaya chast' obespecheniyakriminalisticheskoy informatsiey sledstvennoy deyatel'nosti // Pravo i politika. - 2014. - 12. - C. 1865 - 1870. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.12.13689.