Review: This article demonstrates that within the legal language there have been discovered the so-called ascriptive legal utterances (ascriptions), which differ from the descriptive statements. The author determines that the ascriptions in law help realize a special function of the language – the performative one, or taking action using words. It became possible as a result of implementation within the legal language of a methodological and conceptual apparatus of the theory of speech acts, developed by an English language expert John Austin and American philosopher Searle. The methodology of philosophy of common language, as well as the conceptual apparatus of the theory of speech acts was being used in the course of this work. The author’s main contribution consists in establishment of semantic specificity of the ascriptive legal utterances, and development of the linguistic formula of ascriptions, which reflects theirs special character and importance for the legal language. It is also highlighted that ascription represents a separate speech act, which mostly occurs in the legal environment.

Keywords: law enforcement, pragmatics, semantics, speech act, descriptive utterances, ascriptive legal utterances, legal language, court decision, action, legislative norm

References:
Searle J.R. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language [Text]. Cambridge, 1969. 204 pp.
Kasatkin S.N. Kak opredelyat' sotsial'nye ponyatiya? Kontseptsiya askriptivizma i otmenyaemosti yuridicheskogo yazyka Gerberta Kharta [Tekst]. Samara: Samar. gumanit. akad., 2014. 472 s.
Ostin Dzh.L. Slovo kak deystvie [Tekst] // Novoe v zarubezhnoy lingvistike / Pod red. B.Yu. Gorodetskogo. M., 1986. Vyp. XVII. Teoriya rechevykh aktov. S. 22–130.
Afonasin E.V., Didikin A.B. Filosofiya prava [Tekst]. Novosibirsk: Novosib. gos. un-t, 2006. 92 s.
Khart G.L.A. Pripisyvanie otvetstvennosti i prav [Tekst] // Pravovedenie. 2010. ¹ 5(292). S. 116-135.
Ogleznev V.V. G.L.A. Khart i formirovanie analiticheskoy filosofii prava [Tekst]. Tomsk: Izd-vo Tom. un-ta, 2012. 216 s.
Devitt M. The Metaphysics of Nonfactualism [Text] // Nous. 1996. Vol. 30. P. 159-176.
Ogleznev V.V., Tarasov I.P. Askriptivnost' kak ontologicheskoe svoystvo yuridicheskikh ponyatiy [Tekst] // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya. 2010. ¹ 4(12). S. 101-110.
Ushakov A.A. Ocherki sovetskoy zakonodatel'noy stilistiki. Pravo i yazyk [Tekst]. M.: RAP, 2008. 314 s.
Ogleznev V.V., Surovtsev V.A. Analiticheskaya filosofiya, yuridicheskiy yazyk i filosofiya prava [Tekst]. – Tomsk: Izd-vo Tom. un-ta, 2016. 236 s.
Ogleznev V.V., Surovtsev V.A. Opredelenie per genus proximum et differentiam specificam i yuridicheskiy yazyk [Tekst] // Scholae. Filosofskoe antikovedenie i klassicheskaya traditsiya. 2015. ¹ 2. S. 228-240.
Lezov S.V. Yuridicheskie ponyatiya i yazyk prava v sovremennykh zarubezhnykh issledovaniyakh (nauchno-analiticheskiy obzor) [Tekst]. M.: INION, 1986. 71 s.
Serl Dzh.R. Klassifikatsiya illokutivnykh aktov [Tekst] // Novoe v zarubezhnoy lingvistike / Pod red. B.Yu. Gorodetskogo. M., 1986. Vyp. XVII. S. 170-194.

References (transliteration):
Searle J.R. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language [Text]. Cambridge, 1969. 204 pp.
Kasatkin S.N. Kak opredelyat' sotsial'nye ponyatiya? Kontseptsiya askriptivizma i otmenyaemosti yuridicheskogo yazyka Gerberta Kharta [Tekst]. Samara: Samar. gumanit. akad., 2014. 472 s.
Ostin Dzh.L. Slovo kak deystvie [Tekst] // Novoe v zarubezhnoy lingvistike / Pod red. B.Yu. Gorodetskogo. M., 1986. Vyp. XVII. Teoriya rechevykh aktov. S. 22–130.
Afonasin E.V., Didikin A.B. Filosofiya prava [Tekst]. Novosibirsk: Novosib. gos. un-t, 2006. 92 s.
Khart G.L.A. Pripisyvanie otvetstvennosti i prav [Tekst] // Pravovedenie. 2010. ¹ 5(292). S. 116-135.
Ogleznev V.V. G.L.A. Khart i formirovanie analiticheskoy filosofii prava [Tekst]. Tomsk: Izd-vo Tom. un-ta, 2012. 216 s.
Devitt M. The Metaphysics of Nonfactualism [Text] // Nous. 1996. Vol. 30. P. 159-176.
Ogleznev V.V., Tarasov I.P. Askriptivnost' kak ontologicheskoe svoystvo yuridicheskikh ponyatiy [Tekst] // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya. 2010. ¹ 4(12). S. 101-110.
Ushakov A.A. Ocherki sovetskoy zakonodatel'noy stilistiki. Pravo i yazyk [Tekst]. M.: RAP, 2008. 314 s.
Ogleznev V.V., Surovtsev V.A. Analiticheskaya filosofiya, yuridicheskiy yazyk i filosofiya prava [Tekst]. – Tomsk: Izd-vo Tom. un-ta, 2016. 236 s.
Ogleznev V.V., Surovtsev V.A. Opredelenie per genus proximum et differentiam specificam i yuridicheskiy yazyk [Tekst] // Scholae. Filosofskoe antikovedenie i klassicheskaya traditsiya. 2015. ¹ 2. S. 228-240.
Lezov S.V. Yuridicheskie ponyatiya i yazyk prava v sovremennykh zarubezhnykh issledovaniyakh (nauchno-analiticheskiy obzor) [Tekst]. M.: INION, 1986. 71 s.
Serl Dzh.R. Klassifikatsiya illokutivnykh aktov [Tekst] // Novoe v zarubezhnoy lingvistike / Pod red. B.Yu. Gorodetskogo. M., 1986. Vyp. XVII. S. 170-194.

Review: The author explores the question of tragedies of communities and anti-communities during the process of creation of the patented innovative objects, as well as use of patents for strategic purposes; the concept of “patent maze”, “royalty stacking”, etc. are being revealed on the practical examples. The author doubts the ability of the modern model of protection of the objects of patent law to accomplish the goals for which it was intended. The listed issues vividly reflect the distortion of the modern model of regulation of the industrial property, and without understanding of them, it is impossible to project reforms and alternatives of this model. The scientific novelty consists in the author’s attempt to demonstrate that the foundation of the modern model of protection of industrial property in reality is distorted, due to the various reasons stated in the article. The author comes to the conclusion that following the strictly formal approach in implementation of the legislation norms on intellectual property, leads to a serious distortion of the functional designation of intellectual property.

Keywords: Strategic patenting, Royalty stacking, Industrial property, Fragmentation of laws, Tendency to patent, Patent maze, Patent trolls, Patent law, Tragedy of anti-communities, Tragedy of communities

References:
Tresse Vitor Schettino; Müller, Juliana Martins Sá. Patentes "Troll" no Contexto Brasileiro: Como Alinhar Experiências Internacionais aos Padrões do Ordenamento Jurídico Nacional? // João Marcelo de Lima Assafim; Salete Oro Boff Luiz Otávio Pimentel. (Org.). Patentes "Troll" no Contexto Brasileiro: Como Alinhar Experiências Internacionais aos Padrões do Ordenamento Jurídico Nacional?. 1ed.Florianópolis: Editora Conpedi 2014, v. , S. 320-339.
Brasil. Constituição Federal 1988 // Internet-sayt Palácio do Planalto. URL: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/Constituicao/Constituicao.htm (data obrashcheniya: 20/08/2015).
Ascensão José de Oliveira. Direitos Intelectuais: Propriedade ou Exclusivo?. Themis: Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UNL, 2008. S. 117-138.
Guerin Kevin. Property Rights and Environmental Policy: A New Zealand Perspective. New Zealand Treasury. – Working Paper 03/02. March 2003. [Elektronnyy resurs] URL: https://ideas.repec.org/p/nzt/nztwps/03-02.html. Data obrashcheniya: 12/04/2016. s.47.
Posner, Richard A. The economics of justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1981.
Eurpean Patent Office. Scenarios for the future: how might IP regimes evolve by 2025? What global legitimacy might such regimes have? Europäisches Patentamt, 2007. S. 124.
Silva Denise Freitas. Pools de patentes: impactos no interesse público e interface com problemas de qualidade do sistema de patentes. Rio de Janeiro, 2012. Tese (Doutorado em Políticas Públicas, Estratégias e Desenvolvimento, ênfase em Inovação, Propriedade Intelectual e Desenvolvimento)-Instituto de Economia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 2012. 201 s.
Shapiro Carl. Navigating the patent thicket: Cross licenses, patent pools, and standard setting. In: Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 1. MIT press, 2001. S. 119-150.
Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii (chast' chetvertaya) ot 18.12.2006 ¹ 230-FZ (red ot 12.03.2014) [Elektronnyy resurs] // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Lemley, Mark. A. Ex ante versus ex post justifications for intellectual property // The University of Chicago law review, p. 129-149, 2004. URL: http://ssrn.com/abstract=494424. Data obrashcheniya: 21/07/2015. 67 s.
Timm, Luciano Benetti, and Renato Caovilla. As Teorias Rivais sobre a Propriedade Intelectual no Brasil // Economic Analysis of Law Review 1.1 (2010): 49-77. 30 s.
Hettinger E. C. Justifying intellectual property // Philosophy & Public Affairs. – 1989. – S. 31-52. URL: http://hettingern.people.cofc.edu/Hettinger%20-%20Justifying%20Intellectual%20Property.pdf. Data obrashcheniya: 20/07/2015. 23 s.
Hardin Garrett. The Tragedy of the Commons // Science, New Series, Vol. 162, No. 3859 (Dec. 13, 1968), pp. 1243-1248. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1724745. Data obrashcheniya: 21/07/2015. 6 s.
Lima Humberto Alves de Vasconcelos. Justificativas Econômicas Utilitaristas para a Propriedade Intelectual. [Elektronnyy resurs] URL: https://www.academia.edu/3891085/Justificativas_Econ%C3%B4micas_Utilitaristas_para_a_Propriedade_Intelectual. Data obrashcheniya: 25/12/2015.
Hosie Spencer. Patent Trolls and the New Tort Reform: A Practitioner's Perspective // ISJLP, v. 4, p. 75, 2008. 13 s.
Mayergoyz, Anna. Lessons from Europe on How to Tame US Patent Trolls. Cornell Int'l LJ, v. 42, p. 241, 2009.

References (transliteration):
Tresse Vitor Schettino; Müller, Juliana Martins Sá. Patentes "Troll" no Contexto Brasileiro: Como Alinhar Experiências Internacionais aos Padrões do Ordenamento Jurídico Nacional? // João Marcelo de Lima Assafim; Salete Oro Boff Luiz Otávio Pimentel. (Org.). Patentes "Troll" no Contexto Brasileiro: Como Alinhar Experiências Internacionais aos Padrões do Ordenamento Jurídico Nacional?. 1ed.Florianópolis: Editora Conpedi 2014, v. , S. 320-339.
Brasil. Constituição Federal 1988 // Internet-sayt Palácio do Planalto. URL: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/Constituicao/Constituicao.htm (data obrashcheniya: 20/08/2015).
Ascensão José de Oliveira. Direitos Intelectuais: Propriedade ou Exclusivo?. Themis: Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UNL, 2008. S. 117-138.
Guerin Kevin. Property Rights and Environmental Policy: A New Zealand Perspective. New Zealand Treasury. – Working Paper 03/02. March 2003. [Elektronnyy resurs] URL: https://ideas.repec.org/p/nzt/nztwps/03-02.html. Data obrashcheniya: 12/04/2016. s.47.
Posner, Richard A. The economics of justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1981.
Eurpean Patent Office. Scenarios for the future: how might IP regimes evolve by 2025? What global legitimacy might such regimes have? Europäisches Patentamt, 2007. S. 124.
Silva Denise Freitas. Pools de patentes: impactos no interesse público e interface com problemas de qualidade do sistema de patentes. Rio de Janeiro, 2012. Tese (Doutorado em Políticas Públicas, Estratégias e Desenvolvimento, ênfase em Inovação, Propriedade Intelectual e Desenvolvimento)-Instituto de Economia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 2012. 201 s.
Shapiro Carl. Navigating the patent thicket: Cross licenses, patent pools, and standard setting. In: Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 1. MIT press, 2001. S. 119-150.
Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii (chast' chetvertaya) ot 18.12.2006 ¹ 230-FZ (red ot 12.03.2014) [Elektronnyy resurs] // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Lemley, Mark. A. Ex ante versus ex post justifications for intellectual property // The University of Chicago law review, p. 129-149, 2004. URL: http://ssrn.com/abstract=494424. Data obrashcheniya: 21/07/2015. 67 s.
Timm, Luciano Benetti, and Renato Caovilla. As Teorias Rivais sobre a Propriedade Intelectual no Brasil // Economic Analysis of Law Review 1.1 (2010): 49-77. 30 s.
Hettinger E. C. Justifying intellectual property // Philosophy & Public Affairs. – 1989. – S. 31-52. URL: http://hettingern.people.cofc.edu/Hettinger%20-%20Justifying%20Intellectual%20Property.pdf. Data obrashcheniya: 20/07/2015. 23 s.
Hardin Garrett. The Tragedy of the Commons // Science, New Series, Vol. 162, No. 3859 (Dec. 13, 1968), pp. 1243-1248. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1724745. Data obrashcheniya: 21/07/2015. 6 s.
Lima Humberto Alves de Vasconcelos. Justificativas Econômicas Utilitaristas para a Propriedade Intelectual. [Elektronnyy resurs] URL: https://www.academia.edu/3891085/Justificativas_Econ%C3%B4micas_Utilitaristas_para_a_Propriedade_Intelectual. Data obrashcheniya: 25/12/2015.
Hosie Spencer. Patent Trolls and the New Tort Reform: A Practitioner's Perspective // ISJLP, v. 4, p. 75, 2008. 13 s.
Mayergoyz, Anna. Lessons from Europe on How to Tame US Patent Trolls. Cornell Int'l LJ, v. 42, p. 241, 2009.

Review: The object of this research is the capabilities and prospects of the application of the achievements of spatial science in criminological research. The subject of this research is the methodology of spatial analysis of the socioeconomic development of Russian regions, which in turn is the primary stage of research in the area of spatial analysis of the causes of crime. The article presents the sequence of actions at this stage, describes the logical model of development of the socioeconomic processes in the space of a separate region, as well as criteria for the evaluation of the level of success of the functionality of the regional socioeconomic system. The scientific novelty consists in devising the methodology of spatial analysis of the socioeconomic development of Russian regions, which is in turn based on the general theoretical-methodological platform of the spatial analysis of the socioeconomic events and processes, including crime. The author substantiates the hypothesis that the level of success of the socioeconomic development of any particular territory that is assessed from the perspective of the analysis of the data on the level and dynamics of economic development of a region, rate of reproduction of its demographic base, quality of the health of its population, as well as the quality of the population as a whole (level of education, etc.), is determined by the vector and intensiveness of the “center-periphery” processes on one hand, and the level of the clarity of the process of compression of social space on the other.

Keywords: Settlement structure, Economic-geographical position, Systemic approach, Socioeconomic development, Region, Spatial analysis, Causes of crime, Infrastructure, Economic structure, Compression of social space

References:
Kuznetsova O. Piramida faktorov sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya regionov // Voprosy ekonomiki. 2013. ¹2. S. 121-131.
Kudryavtsev, V.N. Izbrannye trudy po sotsial'nym naukam. V 3 t. T.2: Kriminologiya, sotsiologiya, konfliktologiya. – M.: Nauka, 2002. 283 s.
Leksin V.N. K metodologii issledovaniya i regulirovaniya protsessov territorial'nogo razvitiya // Region: ekonomika i sotsiologiya. 2009. ¹3. S. 19-40.

References (transliteration):
Kuznetsova O. Piramida faktorov sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya regionov // Voprosy ekonomiki. 2013. ¹2. S. 121-131.
Kudryavtsev, V.N. Izbrannye trudy po sotsial'nym naukam. V 3 t. T.2: Kriminologiya, sotsiologiya, konfliktologiya. – M.: Nauka, 2002. 283 s.
Leksin V.N. K metodologii issledovaniya i regulirovaniya protsessov territorial'nogo razvitiya // Region: ekonomika i sotsiologiya. 2009. ¹3. S. 19-40.

Review: The object of this research is the capabilities and prospects of using the achievements of spatial science in criminological research. The subject of this research is the theoretical prerequisites and methodological basis for application of methods of spatial analysis in cognition of the mechanismof determination of crime. The author raises the question on the importance of formation within the modern researcher of regularities of formation of territorial differences in the indexes of crime of a specific spatial or geographic thinking. It allows grasping the regularities of the functionality of a particular social system within the spatial aspect, which in turn can be “layered” onto already known regularities of formation of the territorial differences in crime and as a result, expand the understanding of the mechanism of determination of crime overall. The scientific novelty of this research consists in the analysis of the theoretical prerequisites and development of methodological basis for spatial analysis of the socioeconomic events and processes, including crime. Spatial analysis is being positioned as an autonomous, narrower direction of scientific research within the framework of geography of crime, which in turn represents one of the sections of criminological theory of determination, studying the causal complex of criminality in the theoretical aspect.

Keywords: Mechanism of determination of crime, Causes of crime, Spatial science, Spatial thinking, Spatial analysis, Geography of crime, Territorial differences in crime, Territorial socioeconomic systems, Modelling, Systemic approach

References:
Nefedova T.G. Szhatie vnegorodskogo osvoennogo prostranstva Rossii: real'nost', a ne illyuziya // Szhatie sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo prostranstva: novoe v teorii regional'nogo razvitiya i praktike ego gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniya. M.: Eslan, 2010. S. 128-145.
Kolomak E. Neravnomernoe prostranstvennoe razvitie v Rossii: ob'yasneniya novoy ekonomicheskoy geografii // Voprosy ekonomiki. 2013. ¹ 2. S. 132-149.
Kuznetsova O. Piramida faktorov sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya regionov // Voprosy ekonomiki. 2013. ¹ 2. S. 121-131.
Fujita M., Krugman P. and Venables A.J. The Spatial Economy. Sities, Regions, and International Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999. 367 p.
Fujita M., Krugman P. The New Economic Geography: Past, Present and the Future // Papers in Regional Science. 2003. Vol. 83. ¹ 1. pp. 139-164.
Spiridonov L., Leps A. Teoreticheskie voprosy izucheniya territorial'nykh razlichiy prestupnosti // Teoreticheskie problemy izucheniya territorial'nykh razlichiy prestupnosti. Tartu, 1985. Vyp. 725. S. 3-18.
Raska E.E. Prestupnost' kak pokazatel' sostoyaniya sotsial'nogo prostranstva (K voprosu ob obosnovanii territorial'nogo podkhoda k izucheniyu prestupnosti) // Teoreticheskie problemy izucheniya territorial'nykh razlichiy v prestupnosti. Tartu, 1987. Vyp. 761. S. 28-29.
Bakharev D.V. K voprosu o predmete i soderzhanii geografii prestupnosti kak odnogo iz napravleniy issledovaniya prichinnogo kompleksa prestupnosti // Kriminologicheskiy zhurnal Baykal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i prava. 2012. ¹ 1. S. 32-38.
Bakharev D.V. Ispol'zovanie integral'nykh pokazateley v issledovanii sotsial'no-ekonomicheskikh faktorov territorial'noy differentsiatsii urovnya prestupnosti: istoriya i sovremennye perspektivy // Kriminologicheskiy zhurnal Baykal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i prava. 2011. ¹ 1. S. 33-41.
Bakharev D.V. Kharakter sovremennykh demograficheskikh protsessov v Rossii i ikh uchet pri izuchenii prichin prestupnosti // Problemy kodifikatsii ugolovnogo zakona: istoriya, sovremennost', budushchee (Posvyashchaetsya 200-letiyu proekta Ugolovnogo ulozheniya 1813 goda) // Materialy VIII Rossiyskogo kongressa ugolovnogo prava, sostoyavshegosya 30-31 maya 2013 g. M., 2013. S. 400-404.
Izuchenie prestupnosti v gorodakh i sel'skoy mestnosti / M.M. Babaev, I.I. Karpets, E.V. Kuznetsova, A.S. Nikiforov i dr. M.: Yurid. lit-ra, 1971. 212 c.
Vliyanie sotsial'nykh usloviy na territorial'nye razlichiya v prestupnosti / M.M. Babaev, V.K. Zvirbul', E.B. Mel'nikova i dr. M.: Izd-vo Vsesoyuz. in-ta po izuch. prichin i razrab. mer preduprezhdeniya prestupnosti, 1977. 140 c.
Babaev M.M., Kuznetsova E.V., Urlanis E.B. Vliyanie demograficheskikh protsessov na prestupnost'. M.: Yurid. lit-ra, 1976. 176 s.
Bakharev D.V. Vozmozhnosti territorial'nogo podkhoda v ramkakh provedeniya kriminologicheskoy ekspertizy Evraziyskoy transportnoy sistemy // Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2013. ¹ 2. S. 141-145.
Pivovarov Yu.L. Al'ternativnaya kontseptsiya makroregional'nogo razvitiya Rossii: szhatie intensivno osvoennogo prostranstva // Mir Rossii. 1996. ¹ 2. S. 63-74.
Baranskiy N.N. Izbrannye trudy: Stanovlenie sovetskoy ekonomicheskoy geografii. M.: Mysl', 1980. 239 s.

References (transliteration):
Nefedova T.G. Szhatie vnegorodskogo osvoennogo prostranstva Rossii: real'nost', a ne illyuziya // Szhatie sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo prostranstva: novoe v teorii regional'nogo razvitiya i praktike ego gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniya. M.: Eslan, 2010. S. 128-145.
Kolomak E. Neravnomernoe prostranstvennoe razvitie v Rossii: ob'yasneniya novoy ekonomicheskoy geografii // Voprosy ekonomiki. 2013. ¹ 2. S. 132-149.
Kuznetsova O. Piramida faktorov sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya regionov // Voprosy ekonomiki. 2013. ¹ 2. S. 121-131.
Fujita M., Krugman P. and Venables A.J. The Spatial Economy. Sities, Regions, and International Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999. 367 p.
Fujita M., Krugman P. The New Economic Geography: Past, Present and the Future // Papers in Regional Science. 2003. Vol. 83. ¹ 1. pp. 139-164.
Spiridonov L., Leps A. Teoreticheskie voprosy izucheniya territorial'nykh razlichiy prestupnosti // Teoreticheskie problemy izucheniya territorial'nykh razlichiy prestupnosti. Tartu, 1985. Vyp. 725. S. 3-18.
Raska E.E. Prestupnost' kak pokazatel' sostoyaniya sotsial'nogo prostranstva (K voprosu ob obosnovanii territorial'nogo podkhoda k izucheniyu prestupnosti) // Teoreticheskie problemy izucheniya territorial'nykh razlichiy v prestupnosti. Tartu, 1987. Vyp. 761. S. 28-29.
Bakharev D.V. K voprosu o predmete i soderzhanii geografii prestupnosti kak odnogo iz napravleniy issledovaniya prichinnogo kompleksa prestupnosti // Kriminologicheskiy zhurnal Baykal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i prava. 2012. ¹ 1. S. 32-38.
Bakharev D.V. Ispol'zovanie integral'nykh pokazateley v issledovanii sotsial'no-ekonomicheskikh faktorov territorial'noy differentsiatsii urovnya prestupnosti: istoriya i sovremennye perspektivy // Kriminologicheskiy zhurnal Baykal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i prava. 2011. ¹ 1. S. 33-41.
Bakharev D.V. Kharakter sovremennykh demograficheskikh protsessov v Rossii i ikh uchet pri izuchenii prichin prestupnosti // Problemy kodifikatsii ugolovnogo zakona: istoriya, sovremennost', budushchee (Posvyashchaetsya 200-letiyu proekta Ugolovnogo ulozheniya 1813 goda) // Materialy VIII Rossiyskogo kongressa ugolovnogo prava, sostoyavshegosya 30-31 maya 2013 g. M., 2013. S. 400-404.
Izuchenie prestupnosti v gorodakh i sel'skoy mestnosti / M.M. Babaev, I.I. Karpets, E.V. Kuznetsova, A.S. Nikiforov i dr. M.: Yurid. lit-ra, 1971. 212 c.
Vliyanie sotsial'nykh usloviy na territorial'nye razlichiya v prestupnosti / M.M. Babaev, V.K. Zvirbul', E.B. Mel'nikova i dr. M.: Izd-vo Vsesoyuz. in-ta po izuch. prichin i razrab. mer preduprezhdeniya prestupnosti, 1977. 140 c.
Babaev M.M., Kuznetsova E.V., Urlanis E.B. Vliyanie demograficheskikh protsessov na prestupnost'. M.: Yurid. lit-ra, 1976. 176 s.
Bakharev D.V. Vozmozhnosti territorial'nogo podkhoda v ramkakh provedeniya kriminologicheskoy ekspertizy Evraziyskoy transportnoy sistemy // Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2013. ¹ 2. S. 141-145.
Pivovarov Yu.L. Al'ternativnaya kontseptsiya makroregional'nogo razvitiya Rossii: szhatie intensivno osvoennogo prostranstva // Mir Rossii. 1996. ¹ 2. S. 63-74.
Baranskiy N.N. Izbrannye trudy: Stanovlenie sovetskoy ekonomicheskoy geografii. M.: Mysl', 1980. 239 s.

Review: The subject of this research is the issue of correlation of human rights and obligations, in particular, the excessive elevation of the former and demotion of the latter, as well as the causes for this disproportion, its negative consequences, its origin and ways of overcoming it. The author conducts the historical analysis of the development of the institution of obligations. In the context of this topic, the subject of the analysis became the current Constitution of the Russian Federation, its flaws, especially in setting the obligations of citizens, as well as the state, its branches of government, and state officials. Attention is also given to the international experience pertaining to human and citizen obligations and realization thereof. The scientific novelty consists in the fact that this work substantiates the need to eliminate the disproportion between the human rights and obligations, and demonstrates that the responsibilities represent an integral part of democracy, as well as the condition of social stability and public order, and that obligations have as significant social value as the rights. The author proposes that the Constitution of the Russian Federation would emphasize the section on the obligations of citizens, as well as the government, its branches, and officials.

Keywords: Rights, Obligations, Responsibility, Freedom, Culture, Democracy, Law, Constitution, Authority, Policy

References:
Gegel'. Raboty raznykh let: v 2 t. M., 1973. T. 2.
Tsybulevskaya O.I. Nravstvennye osnovaniya sovremennogo rossiyskogo prava, Saratov: SGAP, 2004.
Novgorodtsev P.I. Ob obshchestvennom ideale. M.: Pressa, 1991.
Bayniyazov R.C. Pravosoznanie i pravovoy mentalitet v Rossii. Caratov: SYuI MVD Rossii, 2001.
Kistyakovskiy B.A. Cotsial'nye nauki i pravo. Ocherki po metodologii sotsial'nykh nauk i obshchaya teoriya prava. M., 1916.
Esmen A. Obshchie osnovaniya konstitutsionnogo prava. CPb., 1909.
Snezhko O.A. Konstitutsionnye obyazannosti rossiyskogo gosudarstva // Pravovaya politika i pravovaya zhizn'. 2002. ¹ 2.
Martyshin O.V. Politicheskie obyazannosti // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2000. ¹ 4.
Denisova G.D. Konstitutsionnye obyazannosti gosudarstva: ponyatie, istoriya razvitiya, problemy i perspektivy realizatsii// Zhurnal Voronezhskogo gosuniversiteta. 2011. ¹ 1(24).
Zakonodatel'nyy disbalans / Pod red. I. N. Senyakina. Saratov: Izd-vo FGBOU VPO «Sarat. gos. yur. akad.» 2013.
Kudryavtsev V.N., Vasil'ev A.M. Pravo: razvitie obshchego ponyatiya // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1985. ¹ 7.
Sorokin P.A. Obyazannosti vlasti i obyazannosti grazhdanina// Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial'noy antropologii. 1998. ¹ 3.
Vitruk N.V. Obshchaya teoriya pravovogo polozheniya lichnosti. M.: Norma, 2008.
Plekhanov G.V. Izbrannye filosofskie proizvedeniya: v 5 t. M., 1957. T. 3.
Tarusina N.N. Cub'ektivnoe pravo – yuridicheskaya obyazannost'? // Filosofskie problemy sub'ektivnogo prava: tez. dokl. Yaroslavl', Izd-vo Yarosl. un-ta, 1990.
Petrazhitskiy L.I. Teoriya prava i gosudarstva v svyazi s teoriey nravstvennosti. CPb., 1909. T. 1.
Kapustin M. Obshchaya teoriya prava. Dogmatika. M., 1868.
Tikhomirov L.A. Monarkhicheskaya gosudarstvennost'. CPb., 1992.
Marks K., Engel's F. Cochineniya. Izdanie 2. T. 21.
Tsitseron. Ob obyazannostyakh. SPb., 1903.
Gobbs T. O grazhdanine. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. M., 1960.
Ebzeev B.C. Konstitutsiya. Demokratiya. Prava cheloveka. Moskva-Cherkessk: AO «PUL», 1992.
Ebzeev B.S. Lichnost' i gosudarstvo v Rossii: vzaimnaya otvetstvennost' i konstitutsionnye obyazannosti. M.: Norma, 2007.
Gukasyan R.E. Kontseptsiya sliyaniya prav i obyazannostey i administrativno-komandnye metody upravleniya // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1989. ¹ 7.
Teoriya gosudarstva i prava / pod red. P.C. Romashkina, M.C. Strogovicha, V.A. Tumanova. M.: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1962.
Dyugi L. Konstitutsionnoe pravo. Obshchaya teoriya gosudarstva. (Per. c fr. Krasnokutskogo V., Syromyatnikova B., Yashchenko A.). M.: Izd. T-va I.D. Sytina, 1908.
Alekseev N.N. Obyazannost' i pravo // Russkiy narod i gosudarstvo. M.: Agraf, 1998.
Gervagen L.L. Obyazannost' kak osnovanie prava. CPb.: Tip. zh. d. izd. A. F. Shtol'tsenburga, 1908.
Pufendorf S. Ob obyazannostyakh cheloveka i grazhdanina po zakonu estestvennomu. Per s nem. SPb. 1726.
Korkunov N.M. Lektsii po teorii prava. SPb. 1909.
Bernatskiy G.G. Chto yavlyaetsya vysshey tsennost'yu v obshchestve i gosudarstve? // Istoriya. Pravo. Politika. 2011. ¹ 2.
Byukhner-Uder V. Prava cheloveka: Utopiya ili real'nost'? (Per s nem. E.M. Shchuko) M.: Znanie, 1985.
Montesk'e Sh. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. Pod obshch. red. Baskina M.P.-M.: Gospolitizdat, 1955.
Izbrannye sotsial'no-politicheskie i filosofskie proizvedeniya dekabristov. Otv. red. Shchipanov I.Ya.-M.: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo politicheskoy literatury. 1951.
Vinogradov P.G. Ocherki po teorii prava. M.: Skl. izd.: t-vo A. A. Levenson, 1915.
Poryadok vo vlasti-poryadok v strane. Poslanie Prezidenta RF Federal'nomu Sobraniyu Rossiyskoy Federatsii //Rossiyskaya gazeta, 1997, 7 marta.
Chernomorets E.A. Korrespondentsiya prav i obyazannostey grazhdan i gosudarstva v kategorii «svoboda» // Pravovaya politika i pravovaya zhizn'. 2004. ¹ 1.
Tsitseron. Ob obyazannostyakh. SPb., 1903.
Boyko A.I. O estestvennosti pravovykh obyazannostey i nekorrektnosti vozvelichivaniya sub'ektivnykh prav // Pravovaya politika i pravovaya zhizn'. 2004. ¹ 1.
Ebzeev B.S. Chelovek, narod, gosudarstvo v konstitutsionnom stroe Rossii. M.: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 2005.
Voprosy teorii yuridicheskikh obyazannostey: tezisy II mezhvuz. nauch. konf. molodykh uchenykh-yuristov. Otv. za vyp.: Efanova V.A., Motovilovker E.Ya.-Voronezh: izd-vo Voronezh. un-ta, 1988.
Ebzeev B.S. Lichnost' i gosudarstvo v Rossii: vzaimnaya otvetstvennost' i konstitutsionnye obyazannosti. M.: Norma, 2007.
Vig Y. Sootnoshenie prav i obyazannostey cheloveka i problemy prestupnosti // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 1995 ¹ 7.
Klyuchevskiy V.O. Sobr. soch. v 9 t. M.: Mysl', T. 9. 1990.
Abdulatipov R. Kul'turnaya povestka Rossii // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2014. 15 yanvarya.
Doklad Upolnomochennogo po pravam cheloveka v Rossiyskoy Federatsii za 2014 god // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2015, 7 maya.
Il'in I.A. Poryadok ili besporyadok? M.: Narodnoe pravo, 1917.
Proshchanie s krasnym chelovekom. Interv'yu s Aleksievich S.-Blog Yakovlevoy E.// Rossiyskaya gazeta, 2013. 11 sentyabrya.
Lokk D. Izbr. filosofckie proizvedeniya v 2-kh t. M., 1960. T. 2.
Il'in I.A. Pochemu my verim v Rossiyu. M.: Eksmo, 2006.
Shifrovka ot Konchalovskogo // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2015. 9 aprelya.
Il'in I.A. O sushchnosti pravosoznaniya. M.: Rarog', 1993.
Konchalovskiy A.S. Razgovor o progresse i kul'ture // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2010. 4 avgusta.
Solzhenitsyn A.I. Rossiya v obvale. M.: Rus. put', 1998.
Laytman V.I., Shcherbakova N.V. Kollizii v konstitutsionnom zakonodatel'stve Rossii i puti ikh ustraneniya // Yuridicheskie zapiski Yaroslav. un-ta. Yaroslavl', 1997. Vyp. 1.
Avak'yan S. A. Ob etalonakh i obyazannostyakh dlya gosudarstva, obshchestva i ob'edineniy. Kak uprochit' konstitutsionnyy stroy Rossii // NG-Politika, 2015, 17 fevr.

References (transliteration):
Gegel'. Raboty raznykh let: v 2 t. M., 1973. T. 2.
Tsybulevskaya O.I. Nravstvennye osnovaniya sovremennogo rossiyskogo prava, Saratov: SGAP, 2004.
Novgorodtsev P.I. Ob obshchestvennom ideale. M.: Pressa, 1991.
Bayniyazov R.C. Pravosoznanie i pravovoy mentalitet v Rossii. Caratov: SYuI MVD Rossii, 2001.
Kistyakovskiy B.A. Cotsial'nye nauki i pravo. Ocherki po metodologii sotsial'nykh nauk i obshchaya teoriya prava. M., 1916.
Esmen A. Obshchie osnovaniya konstitutsionnogo prava. CPb., 1909.
Snezhko O.A. Konstitutsionnye obyazannosti rossiyskogo gosudarstva // Pravovaya politika i pravovaya zhizn'. 2002. ¹ 2.
Martyshin O.V. Politicheskie obyazannosti // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2000. ¹ 4.
Denisova G.D. Konstitutsionnye obyazannosti gosudarstva: ponyatie, istoriya razvitiya, problemy i perspektivy realizatsii// Zhurnal Voronezhskogo gosuniversiteta. 2011. ¹ 1(24).
Zakonodatel'nyy disbalans / Pod red. I. N. Senyakina. Saratov: Izd-vo FGBOU VPO «Sarat. gos. yur. akad.» 2013.
Kudryavtsev V.N., Vasil'ev A.M. Pravo: razvitie obshchego ponyatiya // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1985. ¹ 7.
Sorokin P.A. Obyazannosti vlasti i obyazannosti grazhdanina// Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial'noy antropologii. 1998. ¹ 3.
Vitruk N.V. Obshchaya teoriya pravovogo polozheniya lichnosti. M.: Norma, 2008.
Plekhanov G.V. Izbrannye filosofskie proizvedeniya: v 5 t. M., 1957. T. 3.
Tarusina N.N. Cub'ektivnoe pravo – yuridicheskaya obyazannost'? // Filosofskie problemy sub'ektivnogo prava: tez. dokl. Yaroslavl', Izd-vo Yarosl. un-ta, 1990.
Petrazhitskiy L.I. Teoriya prava i gosudarstva v svyazi s teoriey nravstvennosti. CPb., 1909. T. 1.
Kapustin M. Obshchaya teoriya prava. Dogmatika. M., 1868.
Tikhomirov L.A. Monarkhicheskaya gosudarstvennost'. CPb., 1992.
Marks K., Engel's F. Cochineniya. Izdanie 2. T. 21.
Tsitseron. Ob obyazannostyakh. SPb., 1903.
Gobbs T. O grazhdanine. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. M., 1960.
Ebzeev B.C. Konstitutsiya. Demokratiya. Prava cheloveka. Moskva-Cherkessk: AO «PUL», 1992.
Ebzeev B.S. Lichnost' i gosudarstvo v Rossii: vzaimnaya otvetstvennost' i konstitutsionnye obyazannosti. M.: Norma, 2007.
Gukasyan R.E. Kontseptsiya sliyaniya prav i obyazannostey i administrativno-komandnye metody upravleniya // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1989. ¹ 7.
Teoriya gosudarstva i prava / pod red. P.C. Romashkina, M.C. Strogovicha, V.A. Tumanova. M.: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1962.
Dyugi L. Konstitutsionnoe pravo. Obshchaya teoriya gosudarstva. (Per. c fr. Krasnokutskogo V., Syromyatnikova B., Yashchenko A.). M.: Izd. T-va I.D. Sytina, 1908.
Alekseev N.N. Obyazannost' i pravo // Russkiy narod i gosudarstvo. M.: Agraf, 1998.
Gervagen L.L. Obyazannost' kak osnovanie prava. CPb.: Tip. zh. d. izd. A. F. Shtol'tsenburga, 1908.
Pufendorf S. Ob obyazannostyakh cheloveka i grazhdanina po zakonu estestvennomu. Per s nem. SPb. 1726.
Korkunov N.M. Lektsii po teorii prava. SPb. 1909.
Bernatskiy G.G. Chto yavlyaetsya vysshey tsennost'yu v obshchestve i gosudarstve? // Istoriya. Pravo. Politika. 2011. ¹ 2.
Byukhner-Uder V. Prava cheloveka: Utopiya ili real'nost'? (Per s nem. E.M. Shchuko) M.: Znanie, 1985.
Montesk'e Sh. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. Pod obshch. red. Baskina M.P.-M.: Gospolitizdat, 1955.
Izbrannye sotsial'no-politicheskie i filosofskie proizvedeniya dekabristov. Otv. red. Shchipanov I.Ya.-M.: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo politicheskoy literatury. 1951.
Vinogradov P.G. Ocherki po teorii prava. M.: Skl. izd.: t-vo A. A. Levenson, 1915.
Poryadok vo vlasti-poryadok v strane. Poslanie Prezidenta RF Federal'nomu Sobraniyu Rossiyskoy Federatsii //Rossiyskaya gazeta, 1997, 7 marta.
Chernomorets E.A. Korrespondentsiya prav i obyazannostey grazhdan i gosudarstva v kategorii «svoboda» // Pravovaya politika i pravovaya zhizn'. 2004. ¹ 1.
Tsitseron. Ob obyazannostyakh. SPb., 1903.
Boyko A.I. O estestvennosti pravovykh obyazannostey i nekorrektnosti vozvelichivaniya sub'ektivnykh prav // Pravovaya politika i pravovaya zhizn'. 2004. ¹ 1.
Ebzeev B.S. Chelovek, narod, gosudarstvo v konstitutsionnom stroe Rossii. M.: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 2005.
Voprosy teorii yuridicheskikh obyazannostey: tezisy II mezhvuz. nauch. konf. molodykh uchenykh-yuristov. Otv. za vyp.: Efanova V.A., Motovilovker E.Ya.-Voronezh: izd-vo Voronezh. un-ta, 1988.
Ebzeev B.S. Lichnost' i gosudarstvo v Rossii: vzaimnaya otvetstvennost' i konstitutsionnye obyazannosti. M.: Norma, 2007.
Vig Y. Sootnoshenie prav i obyazannostey cheloveka i problemy prestupnosti // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 1995 ¹ 7.
Klyuchevskiy V.O. Sobr. soch. v 9 t. M.: Mysl', T. 9. 1990.
Abdulatipov R. Kul'turnaya povestka Rossii // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2014. 15 yanvarya.
Doklad Upolnomochennogo po pravam cheloveka v Rossiyskoy Federatsii za 2014 god // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2015, 7 maya.
Il'in I.A. Poryadok ili besporyadok? M.: Narodnoe pravo, 1917.
Proshchanie s krasnym chelovekom. Interv'yu s Aleksievich S.-Blog Yakovlevoy E.// Rossiyskaya gazeta, 2013. 11 sentyabrya.
Lokk D. Izbr. filosofckie proizvedeniya v 2-kh t. M., 1960. T. 2.
Il'in I.A. Pochemu my verim v Rossiyu. M.: Eksmo, 2006.
Shifrovka ot Konchalovskogo // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2015. 9 aprelya.
Il'in I.A. O sushchnosti pravosoznaniya. M.: Rarog', 1993.
Konchalovskiy A.S. Razgovor o progresse i kul'ture // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2010. 4 avgusta.
Solzhenitsyn A.I. Rossiya v obvale. M.: Rus. put', 1998.
Laytman V.I., Shcherbakova N.V. Kollizii v konstitutsionnom zakonodatel'stve Rossii i puti ikh ustraneniya // Yuridicheskie zapiski Yaroslav. un-ta. Yaroslavl', 1997. Vyp. 1.
Avak'yan S. A. Ob etalonakh i obyazannostyakh dlya gosudarstva, obshchestva i ob'edineniy. Kak uprochit' konstitutsionnyy stroy Rossii // NG-Politika, 2015, 17 fevr.

Review: The article discusses the creation of integration regional international associations, which at times become not only international unions, but also acquire elements of certain public power, a particular public-legal form, and can create its regional supranational (“supra-state”) law. At this time it fully applies only to the European Union, but other integration unions can also follow this path (for example, the EAEU). Using the methods of political science, science of state, and comparative-legal methods of studying this new phenomenon, the author concludes that in the EU there is an incomplete public power sui generis, which is not a state power, but has elements of statehood, operates special supranational law, which takes precedence over the law of member-states, and changes the concept of state sovereignty. Its member-states retain state sovereignty, but self-restrict some of its elements. But all of this takes place only within certain framework: certain sovereign rights and government powers voluntarily transferred to the EU by the member-states.

Keywords: constitutionalism, EAEU, supra-state law, Supranational law, Public-legal form, European Union, Regional organizations, international law, supranational law, constitutional law

References:
http://www.rosbalt.ru/main/2015/03/09/1375834.html; http://sol.ru/news/show/prezident_francii_vistupil_za_sozdanie_pravitelst
https://docviever./yandex.ru/?url=ya-mail%3A% etc.(data dostupa 10 yanvapya 2015 g.)
Edeya porivnyal'nogo mezhnarodnogo prava. Pro et contra. Zbirnik naukovykh prats' na chest' inozemnogo chlena NAN Ukraini Uil'yama Eliotta Batlera. Kiiv-D'viv.2015.
Emergence of Global Administrative Law. Durham. 2005
Kashkin S.Yu., Chetverikov A.O., Kalinichenko P.A. i dr. Pravo Evropeyskogo Soyuza: uchebnoe posobie (otv. red. S.Yu. Kashkin).-3-e izd., pererab. i dop. Prospekt.M., 2011
This article questions the popular and national sovereignty are not considered
Engineering Constitutional Change. A Comparative Perspectives on Europe, Canada and the USA. Ed. By Xenophon Contiades. Rutledge. N.Y. 2013. A collection of essays prepared by the authors of 19 countries.
Machado J.E.M. The Portuguese Constitution 1976. Half-Live and Decay // Engineering Constitutional Change. A Comparative Perspectives on Europe, Canada and the USA. Ed. By Xenophon Contiades. Rutledge. N.Y. 2013. P.294.
Entin L.M. Pravo Evropeyskogo soyuza. Novyy etap evolyutsii: 2009-2017 gody. M. 2009.
Weak elements of coercion took place in the Council of Europe, the Organization for security and cooperation in Europe (OSCE), , and in distant Europe African Union foreseen even a right of interference in the internal affairs of Member States. In paragraph (h) of its Statute, art. 4 (2002) refers to "the right of the Union to intervene in the Affairs of a Member State in accordance with the decision of the Assembly in respect of grave circumstances, namely war crimes, genocide and crimes against humanity." See: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/901880996
Loughlin M. What is constitutionalism? // The Twilight of Constitutionalism? Oxford. 2010 .P. 48-73 The name of the collection of articles revealing: "twilight constitutionalism."
Technical sensors exist in many management technical systems (e.g. defects on car panel red light is lit), the feedbacks will follow when the situation will be corrected by the driver.
Konstitutsionnyy Sud RF postavil svoi resheniya vyshe mezhdunarodnykh. Opublikovano na sayte "Rossiyskoy Gazety" 7 dekabrya 2013 g.
Potapenko E.T. Teoreticheskie osnovy pravovoy integratsii.Saratov.2011.S.11.
Ignatenko G.V.. Vzaimodeystvie vnutrigosudarstvennogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava. Uchebnoe posobie. Sverdlovsk. 1981
Lukashuk I.I. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo v sudakhgosudarstv.M..1993;
Novikova L.A. Obshchepriznannye printsipy i normy mezhdunarodnogo prava v sisteme rossiyskogo publichnogo prava. Avtoref. diss..kand...yurid.nauk.M.2001.
Rodionov T.A. Problemy vliyaniya mezhdunarodnogo prava na otechestvennoe ugolovnoe zakonodatel'stvo: istoriya voprosa i perspektivy razvitiya. M.2012.
Galikeeva I.G. Razvitie rossiyskogo agrarnogo prava s uchetom norm mezhdunarodnogo prava Avtoreferat diss...kand.yurid.nauk. Ufa.1999 .
Emergence of Global Administrative Law. Durham. 2005
Khizhnyak V.S. Vzaimodeystvie natsional'nogo prava Rossii i mezhdunarodnogo prava: konstitutsionnye osnovy. Saratov. 2007.
S.l. Zivs wrote in 1981, "translating international law into national law." 1981.
Biryukov P.N. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. Uchebnik. Izd.5-e.M.2012.
Lukashuk I.I. Normy mezhdunarodnogo prava v pravovoy sisteme Rossii. M.1997;
Tsivadze, N. A. Primenenie norm mezhdunarodnogo prava sudami Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Avtoref. diss… kand. yuridicheskikh nauk. M., 2005;
Shinkaretskaya G.G. Primenenie mezhdunarodnogo prava v Rossii. Uchebnoe posobie. M. 2010
Gavrilov V.V. Ponyatie i vzaimodeystvie mezhdunarodnoy i natsional'nykh pravovykh sistem. Vladivostok. 2005;
Malakhov V.P. Pravovye sistemy gosudarstv i mezhdunarodnoe pravo. M. 2004 i dr. Sootnoshenie mezhdunarodnogo i natsional'nogo prava: teoriya, praktika, problemy prepodavaniya. Sb.st. SPb.2009

References (transliteration):
http://www.rosbalt.ru/main/2015/03/09/1375834.html; http://sol.ru/news/show/prezident_francii_vistupil_za_sozdanie_pravitelst
https://docviever./yandex.ru/?url=ya-mail%3A% etc.(data dostupa 10 yanvapya 2015 g.)
Edeya porivnyal'nogo mezhnarodnogo prava. Pro et contra. Zbirnik naukovykh prats' na chest' inozemnogo chlena NAN Ukraini Uil'yama Eliotta Batlera. Kiiv-D'viv.2015.
Emergence of Global Administrative Law. Durham. 2005
Kashkin S.Yu., Chetverikov A.O., Kalinichenko P.A. i dr. Pravo Evropeyskogo Soyuza: uchebnoe posobie (otv. red. S.Yu. Kashkin).-3-e izd., pererab. i dop. Prospekt.M., 2011
This article questions the popular and national sovereignty are not considered
Engineering Constitutional Change. A Comparative Perspectives on Europe, Canada and the USA. Ed. By Xenophon Contiades. Rutledge. N.Y. 2013. A collection of essays prepared by the authors of 19 countries.
Machado J.E.M. The Portuguese Constitution 1976. Half-Live and Decay // Engineering Constitutional Change. A Comparative Perspectives on Europe, Canada and the USA. Ed. By Xenophon Contiades. Rutledge. N.Y. 2013. P.294.
Entin L.M. Pravo Evropeyskogo soyuza. Novyy etap evolyutsii: 2009-2017 gody. M. 2009.
Weak elements of coercion took place in the Council of Europe, the Organization for security and cooperation in Europe (OSCE), , and in distant Europe African Union foreseen even a right of interference in the internal affairs of Member States. In paragraph (h) of its Statute, art. 4 (2002) refers to "the right of the Union to intervene in the Affairs of a Member State in accordance with the decision of the Assembly in respect of grave circumstances, namely war crimes, genocide and crimes against humanity." See: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/901880996
Loughlin M. What is constitutionalism? // The Twilight of Constitutionalism? Oxford. 2010 .P. 48-73 The name of the collection of articles revealing: "twilight constitutionalism."
Technical sensors exist in many management technical systems (e.g. defects on car panel red light is lit), the feedbacks will follow when the situation will be corrected by the driver.
Konstitutsionnyy Sud RF postavil svoi resheniya vyshe mezhdunarodnykh. Opublikovano na sayte "Rossiyskoy Gazety" 7 dekabrya 2013 g.
Potapenko E.T. Teoreticheskie osnovy pravovoy integratsii.Saratov.2011.S.11.
Ignatenko G.V.. Vzaimodeystvie vnutrigosudarstvennogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava. Uchebnoe posobie. Sverdlovsk. 1981
Lukashuk I.I. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo v sudakhgosudarstv.M..1993;
Novikova L.A. Obshchepriznannye printsipy i normy mezhdunarodnogo prava v sisteme rossiyskogo publichnogo prava. Avtoref. diss..kand...yurid.nauk.M.2001.
Rodionov T.A. Problemy vliyaniya mezhdunarodnogo prava na otechestvennoe ugolovnoe zakonodatel'stvo: istoriya voprosa i perspektivy razvitiya. M.2012.
Galikeeva I.G. Razvitie rossiyskogo agrarnogo prava s uchetom norm mezhdunarodnogo prava Avtoreferat diss...kand.yurid.nauk. Ufa.1999 .
Emergence of Global Administrative Law. Durham. 2005
Khizhnyak V.S. Vzaimodeystvie natsional'nogo prava Rossii i mezhdunarodnogo prava: konstitutsionnye osnovy. Saratov. 2007.
S.l. Zivs wrote in 1981, "translating international law into national law." 1981.
Biryukov P.N. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. Uchebnik. Izd.5-e.M.2012.
Lukashuk I.I. Normy mezhdunarodnogo prava v pravovoy sisteme Rossii. M.1997;
Tsivadze, N. A. Primenenie norm mezhdunarodnogo prava sudami Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Avtoref. diss… kand. yuridicheskikh nauk. M., 2005;
Shinkaretskaya G.G. Primenenie mezhdunarodnogo prava v Rossii. Uchebnoe posobie. M. 2010
Gavrilov V.V. Ponyatie i vzaimodeystvie mezhdunarodnoy i natsional'nykh pravovykh sistem. Vladivostok. 2005;
Malakhov V.P. Pravovye sistemy gosudarstv i mezhdunarodnoe pravo. M. 2004 i dr. Sootnoshenie mezhdunarodnogo i natsional'nogo prava: teoriya, praktika, problemy prepodavaniya. Sb.st. SPb.2009

Review: This article is dedicated to the research of the fundamental problems of lawmaking at the current stage of development with consideration of the advancements in the Russia’s political-legal thought. The subject of this research is the analysis of the nature of modern legislation through the study of its primary and most important issues. The goal of this work is to assess the current state of Russian legislation with consideration of the characteristics of its key issues, and evaluate the state of modern scientific developments in this area in the context of globalization of modern Russian law. As a result, the author determines the following problems: the problem of legislative fixation of the conceptual-categorical apparatus in the area of lawmaking; problem of legal language; problem of lawmaking techniques (technical methods of lawmaking); problem of harmonization of the federal and regional legislations; problem of gaps in the laws and juridical collisions; problem of improving the vectors of legal policy in the area of lawmaking; problem in preparation of specialists in the sphere of lawmaking and responsibility in this area. The author concludes that at this time juridical science clearly manifests the trend of unification of law and lawmaking.

Keywords: Jurisprudence, Law, Lawmaking, Legal science, Legislation, Regulation, Gaps, Collisions, Decisions, Policy

References:
Vlasenko N.A. Zakonodatel’naya tekhnologiya: (Teoriya. Opyt. Pravila): Uchebnoe posobie. Irkutsk: Vostochno-Sibirskaya
izdatel’skaya kompaniya. 2001.
Vlasenko N.A. Neopredelennost’ v prave: priroda i formy vyrazheniya // Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. 2013. ¹ 2.
Vlasenko N.A. Yazyk prava: Monografiya. Irkutsk: Vostochno-sibirskoe knizhnoe izdatel’stvo, AO «Norma-plyus», 1997.
Gorbul’ Yu.A. Problemy sovershenstvovaniya zakonotvorchestva v Rossiiskoi Federatsii // Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. 2004. ¹ 6.
Kerimov D.A. Problemy obshchei teorii prava. M.: NOU «Sovremennyi Gumanitarnyi Institut», 2000.
Kozlikhin I.Yu. Pravo, zakon i vlast’ v sovremennoi Rossii // Nash trudnyi put’ k pravu: Materialy filosofsko-pravovykh
chtenii pamyati akademika V.S. Nersesyantsa / Sost. V.G. Grafskii. M.: Norma, 2006.
Polenina S.V. Zakonotvorcheskaya politika // Pravovaya politika Rossii: teoriya i praktika: monografiya / pod red. N.I. Matuzova
i A.V. Mal’ko. M.: TK Velbi, Izd-vo Prospekt, 2006.
Sal’nikov V.P., Romashov R.A. Tekhniko-pravovye aspekty zakonotvorchestva v sovremennoi Rossii // Zakonotvorcheskaya
tekhnika sovremennoi Rossii: sostoyanie, problemy, sovershenstvovanie: Sbornik statei: V 2 t. / Pod red. doktora yurid.
nauk, professora, akademika RAEN i PANI, zasluzhennogo deyatelya nauki RF V.M. Baranova. Nizhnii Novgorod, 2001:
Nizhegorodskaya akademiya MVD. T. I.
Senyakin I.N. Spetsializatsiya i unifikatsiya rossiiskogo zakonodatel’stva – osnovnye formy obespecheniya ego sbalansirovannosti
// Zakonodatel’nyi disbalans / [I.N. Senyakin, A.A. Fomin, A.A. Nikitin i dr.]; pod red. I.N. Senyakina; FGBOU VPO
«Saratovskaya gosudarstvennaya yuridicheskaya akademiya». Saratov: Izd-vo FGBOU VPO «Saratovskaya gosudarstvennaya
yuridicheskaya akademiya», 2013.

References (transliteration):
Vlasenko N.A. Zakonodatel’naya tekhnologiya: (Teoriya. Opyt. Pravila): Uchebnoe posobie. Irkutsk: Vostochno-Sibirskaya
izdatel’skaya kompaniya. 2001.
Vlasenko N.A. Neopredelennost’ v prave: priroda i formy vyrazheniya // Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. 2013. ¹ 2.
Vlasenko N.A. Yazyk prava: Monografiya. Irkutsk: Vostochno-sibirskoe knizhnoe izdatel’stvo, AO «Norma-plyus», 1997.
Gorbul’ Yu.A. Problemy sovershenstvovaniya zakonotvorchestva v Rossiiskoi Federatsii // Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. 2004. ¹ 6.
Kerimov D.A. Problemy obshchei teorii prava. M.: NOU «Sovremennyi Gumanitarnyi Institut», 2000.
Kozlikhin I.Yu. Pravo, zakon i vlast’ v sovremennoi Rossii // Nash trudnyi put’ k pravu: Materialy filosofsko-pravovykh
chtenii pamyati akademika V.S. Nersesyantsa / Sost. V.G. Grafskii. M.: Norma, 2006.
Polenina S.V. Zakonotvorcheskaya politika // Pravovaya politika Rossii: teoriya i praktika: monografiya / pod red. N.I. Matuzova
i A.V. Mal’ko. M.: TK Velbi, Izd-vo Prospekt, 2006.
Sal’nikov V.P., Romashov R.A. Tekhniko-pravovye aspekty zakonotvorchestva v sovremennoi Rossii // Zakonotvorcheskaya
tekhnika sovremennoi Rossii: sostoyanie, problemy, sovershenstvovanie: Sbornik statei: V 2 t. / Pod red. doktora yurid.
nauk, professora, akademika RAEN i PANI, zasluzhennogo deyatelya nauki RF V.M. Baranova. Nizhnii Novgorod, 2001:
Nizhegorodskaya akademiya MVD. T. I.
Senyakin I.N. Spetsializatsiya i unifikatsiya rossiiskogo zakonodatel’stva – osnovnye formy obespecheniya ego sbalansirovannosti
// Zakonodatel’nyi disbalans / [I.N. Senyakin, A.A. Fomin, A.A. Nikitin i dr.]; pod red. I.N. Senyakina; FGBOU VPO
«Saratovskaya gosudarstvennaya yuridicheskaya akademiya». Saratov: Izd-vo FGBOU VPO «Saratovskaya gosudarstvennaya
yuridicheskaya akademiya», 2013.

Review: The object of this research is the theoretical substantiation of the copyright law starting from the times of Johannes Gutenberg and first normative acts, which are associated with the designated branch of law. The author pursues the correlation between the prerequisites of the emergence of copyright law and its practical implementation in the modern world, in order to examine if its prerequisites correspond with the demands of modern society. For better understanding of the certain problems of copyright law, it was necessary to study contractual legal relations, which serve as a transfer instrument for exclusive usage rights. The author attempts to determine the important directions of this reform of the copyright law. The author’s main contribution into the research of this topic is the description of the essential aspects of copyright law in the light of criticizing the foundations of this branch of law. The conclusion is made that the broad expansion of the most flexible methods of managing copyrights such as Creative Common, suggests that the authors do not always desire to have an all-encompassing protection of their rights and receive revenue, but rather want to make their contribution into the development of the scientific and cultural potential of the society.

Keywords: justice, contractual relations, social nature of knowledge, «Creative Commons», prerequisites for reforms, functions of Copyright Law, Copyright Law, branches of law, new models of regulation, collaborative works

References:
VOIS. Bernskaya konventsiya po okhrane literaturnykh i khudozhestvennykh proizvedeniy (izmenennaya 28 sentyabrya 1979 g.). [Elektronnyy resurs] Rezhim dostupa: http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/ru/treaties/text.jsp?file_id=283702. Data obrashcheniya 01/12/2015.
Gonçalves, Carlos Roberto. Direito civil brasileiro, volume 3 : contratos e atos unilaterais / Carlos Roberto Gonçalves. –
ed. – São Paulo : Saraiva, 2014. 11. Gagliano, Pablo Stolze. Novo curso de direito civil, volume 4 : contratos, tomo I: teoria geral / Pablo Stolze Gagliano, Rodolfo Pamplona Filho. – 8. ed. rev. atual. ampl. – São Paulo: Saraiva, 2012.
E.A. Sukhanov. Rossiyskoe grazhdanskoe pravo: Uchebnik: V 2 t. T. II: Obyazatel'stvennoe pravo / Otv. red. E.A. Sukhanov. – 2-e izd., stereotip. – M.: Statut, 2011. – 1208 c
Sukhanov E.A. Rossiyskoe grazhdanskoe pravo: Uchebnik: V 2 t. T. I: Obshchaya chast'. Veshchnoe pravo. Nasledstvennoe pravo. Intellektual'nye prava. Lichnye neimushchestvennye prava / Otv. Red. E.A. Sukhanov.-3-e izd., stereotip.-M.: Statut, 2013.-958 s.
Sudarikov S. A. Pravo intellektual'noy sobstvennosti: ucheb. — M.: TK Velbi, Izd-vo Prospekt, 2008.— 368 s.
Ascensão, José de Oliveira. Direito Autoral. 2ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Renovar, 1997.
Menezes, Elisângela Dias. Curso de Direito Autoral. Belo Horizonte: Del Rey, 2007.
Ploman, Edward W.; Hamilton, L. Clark. Copyright: Intellectual Property in the Information Age. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Books, 1980.
Lowndes, John J. An Historical Sketch of the Law of Copyright; with remarks on sergeant talfourd’s bill. London: Saunders and Benning, Fleet Street, 1840.
Moraes, Rodrigo. A função social da propriedade intelectual na era das novas tecnologias // Direito autoral. – Brasília : Ministério da Cultura, 2006. 436 p. – (Coleção cadernos de políticas culturais ; v. 1).
Boyle, James. A Manifesto on WIPO and the Future of Intellectual Property. Duke L. & Tech. Rev., v. 2004, p. 9-15, 2004.
Ispol'zovanie litsenziy Creative Commons v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Analiticheskiy doklad / Pod red. Yu.E. Khokhlova. – M.: Institut razvitiya informatsionnogo obshchestva, 2011. – 94 s.
Creative Commons. The State of The Commons. [Elektronnyy resurs] Rezhim dostupa: https://stateof.creativecommons.org/report/. Data obrashcheniya 01/12/2015.
Büchner, Jorge. Aportaciones a un debate: la apropiación privada de la innovación social. Mientras tanto n° 96 (otoño 2005), p. 117-122, 2005
Boldyrev S.I. Osnovnye sposoby narusheniya avtorskikh prav v seti Internet // Yuridicheskie issledovaniya. - 2014. - 12. - C. 35 - 43. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7136.2014.12.13708. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_13708.html

References (transliteration):
VOIS. Bernskaya konventsiya po okhrane literaturnykh i khudozhestvennykh proizvedeniy (izmenennaya 28 sentyabrya 1979 g.). [Elektronnyy resurs] Rezhim dostupa: http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/ru/treaties/text.jsp?file_id=283702. Data obrashcheniya 01/12/2015.
Gonçalves, Carlos Roberto. Direito civil brasileiro, volume 3 : contratos e atos unilaterais / Carlos Roberto Gonçalves. –
ed. – São Paulo : Saraiva, 2014. 11. Gagliano, Pablo Stolze. Novo curso de direito civil, volume 4 : contratos, tomo I: teoria geral / Pablo Stolze Gagliano, Rodolfo Pamplona Filho. – 8. ed. rev. atual. ampl. – São Paulo: Saraiva, 2012.
E.A. Sukhanov. Rossiyskoe grazhdanskoe pravo: Uchebnik: V 2 t. T. II: Obyazatel'stvennoe pravo / Otv. red. E.A. Sukhanov. – 2-e izd., stereotip. – M.: Statut, 2011. – 1208 c
Sukhanov E.A. Rossiyskoe grazhdanskoe pravo: Uchebnik: V 2 t. T. I: Obshchaya chast'. Veshchnoe pravo. Nasledstvennoe pravo. Intellektual'nye prava. Lichnye neimushchestvennye prava / Otv. Red. E.A. Sukhanov.-3-e izd., stereotip.-M.: Statut, 2013.-958 s.
Sudarikov S. A. Pravo intellektual'noy sobstvennosti: ucheb. — M.: TK Velbi, Izd-vo Prospekt, 2008.— 368 s.
Ascensão, José de Oliveira. Direito Autoral. 2ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Renovar, 1997.
Menezes, Elisângela Dias. Curso de Direito Autoral. Belo Horizonte: Del Rey, 2007.
Ploman, Edward W.; Hamilton, L. Clark. Copyright: Intellectual Property in the Information Age. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Books, 1980.
Lowndes, John J. An Historical Sketch of the Law of Copyright; with remarks on sergeant talfourd’s bill. London: Saunders and Benning, Fleet Street, 1840.
Moraes, Rodrigo. A função social da propriedade intelectual na era das novas tecnologias // Direito autoral. – Brasília : Ministério da Cultura, 2006. 436 p. – (Coleção cadernos de políticas culturais ; v. 1).
Boyle, James. A Manifesto on WIPO and the Future of Intellectual Property. Duke L. & Tech. Rev., v. 2004, p. 9-15, 2004.
Ispol'zovanie litsenziy Creative Commons v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Analiticheskiy doklad / Pod red. Yu.E. Khokhlova. – M.: Institut razvitiya informatsionnogo obshchestva, 2011. – 94 s.
Creative Commons. The State of The Commons. [Elektronnyy resurs] Rezhim dostupa: https://stateof.creativecommons.org/report/. Data obrashcheniya 01/12/2015.
Büchner, Jorge. Aportaciones a un debate: la apropiación privada de la innovación social. Mientras tanto n° 96 (otoño 2005), p. 117-122, 2005
Boldyrev S.I. Osnovnye sposoby narusheniya avtorskikh prav v seti Internet // Yuridicheskie issledovaniya. - 2014. - 12. - C. 35 - 43. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7136.2014.12.13708. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_13708.html

Review: This work presents the analytical research of the issue of dominant juridical principle of relations of public owners in property sphere. Based on synthetic generalization of phenomenological characteristics of public property, norms of Russia’s legislation and practice of its application, and various scientific opinions the author comes to a conclusion that the nature of relations of public owners with other owners cannot be defined by the act of legal equality of participants of the transaction set in civil legislation. Comparative analysis of the norms of constitutional and civil legislation, with consideration of relevant legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, demonstrates that the property relations of public owners are based on the principle that is different in its legal nature. Relations between the public owners are based on the idea of their constitutional equality under the federative nature of the Russian state. This conclusion derives from the comparative analysis of the legal position of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation formulated during a hearing of a case which argued the constitutionality of the transfer of state property of the constituents of the Russian Federation to federal property as a result of delimitation of authority on the subjects of joint competence of the Russian Federation and its constituents.

Keywords: constitution, nation, legal axiology, socio-cultural values, public, public authority, public property, public interests, constitutional right, public relations

References:
Annenkov K. Sistema russkago grazhdanskago prava. T.2. 2-e izd., peresmotr. i dop.: Reprintnoe izdanie. – SPb.: Tipografiya M. M. Stasyulevicha, 1900. – 703 s.
Venediktov A. V. Gosudarstvennaya sotsialisticheskaya sobstvennost' / Otv. red. Raykher V. K. ‒ M., L.: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1948. ‒ 839 c.
Vetyutnev Yu. Yu. Aksiologiya pravovoy formy : monografiya. – M.: Yurlitinform, 2013. ‒ 200 s.
Vinnitskiy A. V. Upravlenie gosudarstvennoy sobstvennost'yu na sovremennom etape: voprosy doktriny i zakonodatel'nogo regulirovaniya // Pravo i politika. 2010. ¹ 11.-S. 1909-1918.
Grazhdanskiy kodeks RF (chast' pervaya) ot 30.11.1994 ¹ 51-FZ (v red. ot 29.06.2015), p. 5 st. 214 // SZ RF. 1994. ¹ 32. St. 3301.
Grazhdanskoe pravo : ucheb.: v 3 t. T. 1. ‒ 6-e izd., pererab. i dop. / otv. red. A. P. Sergeev, Yu. K. Tolstoy.-M.: TK «Velbi», Izd-vo Prospekt, 2006. ‒ 776 s.
Korkunov N. M. Lektsii po obshchey teorii prava. – M.: ROSSPEN, 2010. – 520 s.
Mal'ko A. V., Sumenkov S. Yu. Privilegii i immunitety kak osobye pravovye isklyucheniya. ‒ Penza: Informatsionno-izdatel'skiy tsentr Penzenskogo gos. un-ta, 2005. ‒ 180 s.
Mamut L. S. Pravovoe obshchenie: ocherk teorii. ‒ M.: NORMA: INFRA-M, 2011. ‒ 80 s.
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 30.06.2006 ¹ 8-P po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti ryada polozheniy chasti 11 stat'i 154 Federal'nogo zakona ot 22 avgusta 2004 goda ¹ 122-FZ…v svyazi s zaprosom Pravitel'stva Moskvy // SZ RF. 2006. ¹ 28. St. 3117.
Pravo sobstvennosti v SSSR / Pod red. Yu. K. Tolstogo, V. F. Yakovleva. – M., 1989. – 287 s.
Rossiyskoe grazhdanskoe pravo: Uchebnik: v 2 t. T. I: Obshchaya chast'. Veshchnoe pravo. Nasledstvennoe pravo. Intellektual'nye prava. Lichnye neimushchestvennye prava / Otv. red. E. A. Sukhanov.-4-e izd., stereotip.-M.: Statut, 2014. ‒ 958 s.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 22.08.2004 ¹ 122-FZ (v red. ot 29.06.2015) «O vnesenii izmeneniy v zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii i priznanii utrativshimi silu nekotorykh zakonodatel'nykh aktov Rossiyskoy Federatsii v svyazi s prinyatiem federal'nykh zakonov “O vnesenii izmeneniy i dopolneniy v Federal'nyy zakon "Ob obshchikh printsipakh organizatsii zakonodatel'nykh (predstavitel'nykh) i ispolnitel'nykh organov gosudarstvennoy vlasti sub'ektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii" i "Ob obshchikh printsipakh organizatsii mestnogo samoupravleniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii"”, abz. 33 ch. 11 st. 154 // SZ RF. 2004. ¹ 35. St. 3607.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 06.10.1999 ¹ 184-FZ (s izm. i dop.) «Ob obshchikh printsipakh organizatsii zakonodatel'nykh (predstavitel'nykh) i ispolnitel'nykh organov gosudarstvennoy vlasti sub'ektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii», st. 26.12 // SZ RF. 1999. ¹ 42. St. 5005.
Fedorets M. N., Avdeev D. A. Konstitutsionno-pravovoy poisk modeli formy gosudarstvenno-territorial'nogo ustroystva Rossiyskoy federatsii. // Pravo i politika. – 2014. – ¹ 11. – S. 1661-1669.
Chebotarev G. N. Printsip razdeleniya vlastey v gosudarstvennom ustroystve Rossiyskoy Federatsii.-Tyumen', 1997.-218 s.
Chirkin V. E. Publichnoe pravo i yuridicheskie litsa // Pravo i politika. – 2015. – ¹ 1. – S. 6 — 18.
Shakhray S.M. Rol' resheniy Konstitutsionnogo Suda
Rossiyskoy Federatsii v stanovlenii
konstitutsionnoy modeli
rossiyskogo federalizma // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya / Journal of foreighn legislation and comparative law. - 2012. - 2. - C. 27 - 36.
Rudakov A.A. Kodifikatsiya konstitutsionnogo zakonodatel'stva // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 2. - C. 143 - 146. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.02.8.
Ostapovich I.Yu. «Pozitivnoe» normotvorchestvo v praktike organov
konstitutsionnogo kontrolya Rossii i zarubezhnykh stran // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya / Journal of foreighn legislation and comparative law. - 2014. - 5. - C. 797 - 804.

References (transliteration):
Annenkov K. Sistema russkago grazhdanskago prava. T.2. 2-e izd., peresmotr. i dop.: Reprintnoe izdanie. – SPb.: Tipografiya M. M. Stasyulevicha, 1900. – 703 s.
Venediktov A. V. Gosudarstvennaya sotsialisticheskaya sobstvennost' / Otv. red. Raykher V. K. ‒ M., L.: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1948. ‒ 839 c.
Vetyutnev Yu. Yu. Aksiologiya pravovoy formy : monografiya. – M.: Yurlitinform, 2013. ‒ 200 s.
Vinnitskiy A. V. Upravlenie gosudarstvennoy sobstvennost'yu na sovremennom etape: voprosy doktriny i zakonodatel'nogo regulirovaniya // Pravo i politika. 2010. ¹ 11.-S. 1909-1918.
Grazhdanskiy kodeks RF (chast' pervaya) ot 30.11.1994 ¹ 51-FZ (v red. ot 29.06.2015), p. 5 st. 214 // SZ RF. 1994. ¹ 32. St. 3301.
Grazhdanskoe pravo : ucheb.: v 3 t. T. 1. ‒ 6-e izd., pererab. i dop. / otv. red. A. P. Sergeev, Yu. K. Tolstoy.-M.: TK «Velbi», Izd-vo Prospekt, 2006. ‒ 776 s.
Korkunov N. M. Lektsii po obshchey teorii prava. – M.: ROSSPEN, 2010. – 520 s.
Mal'ko A. V., Sumenkov S. Yu. Privilegii i immunitety kak osobye pravovye isklyucheniya. ‒ Penza: Informatsionno-izdatel'skiy tsentr Penzenskogo gos. un-ta, 2005. ‒ 180 s.
Mamut L. S. Pravovoe obshchenie: ocherk teorii. ‒ M.: NORMA: INFRA-M, 2011. ‒ 80 s.
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 30.06.2006 ¹ 8-P po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti ryada polozheniy chasti 11 stat'i 154 Federal'nogo zakona ot 22 avgusta 2004 goda ¹ 122-FZ…v svyazi s zaprosom Pravitel'stva Moskvy // SZ RF. 2006. ¹ 28. St. 3117.
Pravo sobstvennosti v SSSR / Pod red. Yu. K. Tolstogo, V. F. Yakovleva. – M., 1989. – 287 s.
Rossiyskoe grazhdanskoe pravo: Uchebnik: v 2 t. T. I: Obshchaya chast'. Veshchnoe pravo. Nasledstvennoe pravo. Intellektual'nye prava. Lichnye neimushchestvennye prava / Otv. red. E. A. Sukhanov.-4-e izd., stereotip.-M.: Statut, 2014. ‒ 958 s.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 22.08.2004 ¹ 122-FZ (v red. ot 29.06.2015) «O vnesenii izmeneniy v zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii i priznanii utrativshimi silu nekotorykh zakonodatel'nykh aktov Rossiyskoy Federatsii v svyazi s prinyatiem federal'nykh zakonov “O vnesenii izmeneniy i dopolneniy v Federal'nyy zakon "Ob obshchikh printsipakh organizatsii zakonodatel'nykh (predstavitel'nykh) i ispolnitel'nykh organov gosudarstvennoy vlasti sub'ektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii" i "Ob obshchikh printsipakh organizatsii mestnogo samoupravleniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii"”, abz. 33 ch. 11 st. 154 // SZ RF. 2004. ¹ 35. St. 3607.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 06.10.1999 ¹ 184-FZ (s izm. i dop.) «Ob obshchikh printsipakh organizatsii zakonodatel'nykh (predstavitel'nykh) i ispolnitel'nykh organov gosudarstvennoy vlasti sub'ektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii», st. 26.12 // SZ RF. 1999. ¹ 42. St. 5005.
Fedorets M. N., Avdeev D. A. Konstitutsionno-pravovoy poisk modeli formy gosudarstvenno-territorial'nogo ustroystva Rossiyskoy federatsii. // Pravo i politika. – 2014. – ¹ 11. – S. 1661-1669.
Chebotarev G. N. Printsip razdeleniya vlastey v gosudarstvennom ustroystve Rossiyskoy Federatsii.-Tyumen', 1997.-218 s.
Chirkin V. E. Publichnoe pravo i yuridicheskie litsa // Pravo i politika. – 2015. – ¹ 1. – S. 6 — 18.
Shakhray S.M. Rol' resheniy Konstitutsionnogo Suda
Rossiyskoy Federatsii v stanovlenii
konstitutsionnoy modeli
rossiyskogo federalizma // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya / Journal of foreighn legislation and comparative law. - 2012. - 2. - C. 27 - 36.
Rudakov A.A. Kodifikatsiya konstitutsionnogo zakonodatel'stva // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 2. - C. 143 - 146. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.02.8.
Ostapovich I.Yu. «Pozitivnoe» normotvorchestvo v praktike organov
konstitutsionnogo kontrolya Rossii i zarubezhnykh stran // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya / Journal of foreighn legislation and comparative law. - 2014. - 5. - C. 797 - 804.

Review: The author examines the classifications of legal systems and legal families that exist in the Russian and foreign literature, and notices their inaccuracies. The terms "legal system" and "legal family" are often used interchangeably, different social essence of the major legal systems is ignored. Anglo-Saxon law and totalitarian socialist legal system are in the same classification unit. It is offered new approaches and synthesis. The author uses the historical, logical, deductive, inductive and comparative research methods, applies the formational-civilizational approach and, on this basis, identifies three major legal systems in the modern world: the Muslim system, liberal semi-social capitalist system and the totalitarian socialist system. On the basis of socio-culturological legal approach within each of the global systems, the author highlights the legal families. In the Moslem system there are fundamentalist (radical) and modernized (upgraded) legal families, but also for another reason - the Sunni and Shiite communities legal families, in the liberal semi-social capitalist system there are Anglo Saxon, the Romano-German and other families, in the totalitarian socialist system - orthodox Leninist-Bolshevik and modernized partly, upgraded (but only in the area of economic regulation) family.

Keywords: administrative economic law, business law, geopolitics, banking law, the subject of economic law, the legal systems, Classification, The Muslim system, Liberal capitalist system, Totalitarian socialist system, Legal families, Comparative Law, Family Law, Islamic law, common law, Economics, law, economic law, investment law, customs law

References:
Sorokin P. A. Chelovek. Tsivilizatsiya. Obshchestvo / /.Obshch. red., sost. i predisl. A. Yu. Sogomonov: Per. s angl. M.: Politizdat, 1992. [Sorokin P. A. Man. Civilization. Society], ed. A. Iu. Sogomonov (1992).
Toynbi A. Postizhenie istorii. M. 1991. S.731 {A. Toynbee, Comprehension of History] (1991}.
Kuzyk B.N., Yakovets Yu.V.-Tsivilizatsii: teoriya, istoriya, dialog, budushchee. 6 tomov. [2006-2009, PDF, RUS] ;Kuzyk B. N., Yakovets Yu. V. Tsivilizatsii: teoriya, istoriya, dialog, budushchee // T. III: Severnoe Prichernomor'e — prostranstvo vzaimodeystviya tsivilizatsiy. — M.: Institut ekonomicheskikhstrategiy, 2008. — S. 18. [B. N. Kuzyk and Iu. V. Iakovets, Civilization: Theory, History, Dialogue, Future/ (2006-2009), III].
Almond G and Verba S. The Civil Culture .Princeton.1963
Legrand P. Fragment on Law-in-Culture. P.1999; LEGRAND P. Le droit comparé, P., 4ème édition, R.2011.
The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law/ ed. by M.Reimann, R.Zimmermann. Oxford. 2008.P.631.[ See M. Reimann and R. Zimmermann (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (2008), p. 631.]
Rossiyskaya gazeta [Russian Newspaper], 1 July 2014.
Hamon F., Troper M. Droit constitutionnel.30e éd.; 2007, p. 79. Sm.:Toynbi A. Postizhenie istorii. M. 1991. S.73
Petrova G.V. Mezhdunarodnoe finansovoe pravo : ucheb. dlya vuzov. – M.: Yurayt; Vysshee obrazovanie, 2009. – S. 15, 16.
Lisovskiy V.I. Sushchnost' i sistema mezhdunarodnogo finansovogo prava // Sov. ezhegodnik mezhdunarodnogo prava (1964-1965). – M.: Nauka, 1966. – S. 134, 135.
Lisovskiy V.I. Mezhdunarodnoe torgovoe i finansovoe pravo. – M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1974.
Veral'skiy M. Rets. na kn.: Shpiller G. Valyutnaya monopoliya i mezhdunarodnye finansovye otnosheniya // Finance.-1963.-¹ 3.
Rovinskiy E.A. K voprosu o predmete mezhdunarodnogo finansovogo prava // Trudy VYuZI. – M., 1967. – T. 9. Voprosy sovetskogo finansovogo prava.
Rovinskiy E.A. Mezhdunarodnye finansovye otnosheniya i ikh pravovoe regulirovanie // Sov. gosudarstvo i pravo.-1965.-¹ 2.-S. 60-68.
Vinnitskiy D.V. Mezhdunarodnoe dogovorno-pravovoe regulirovanie i sovremennoe byudzhetnoe pravo // Ocherki byudzhetno-pravovoy nauki sovremennosti : monografiya / pod obshch. red. E.Yu. Grachevoy i N.P. Kucheryavenko. – M.; Khar'kov, 2009.
Al'tshuler A.B. Mezhdunarodnoe valyutnoe pravo. – M: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1984.
Popondopulo V.F. Mezhdunarodnoe kommercheskoe pravo. — SPb., 2004.
Vel'yaminov G.M. Mezhdunarodnoe ekonomicheskoe pravo i protsess (Akademicheskiy kurs) : ucheb.-M.: Volters Kluver, 2006.
Shumilov V.M. Mezhdunarodnoe finansovoe pravo : ucheb.-2-e izd. – M.: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2011. – S. 27.
Mezhdunarodnaya finansovaya sistema: vyzovy XXI veka : monografiya / red., per. M.A. Shapovalov. – M.: Buki Vedi, 2013. – S. 14.
Petrova G.V. Mezhdunarodnoe finansovoe pravo : ucheb. dlya vuzov. – M.: Yurayt; Vysshee obrazovanie, 2009. – S. 17.
Shumilov V.M. Mezhdunarodnoe ekonomicheskoe pravo : ucheb.-metod. posobie. 2-e izd. – M.: OOO IKK «DeKA», 2002. – S. 42.
Rukavishnikova I.V. Metod finansovogo prava : avtoref. dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk.-Saratov, 2004.
El'kind P.S. Sushchnost' sovetskogo ugolovno-protsessual'nogo prava.-LGU, 1963.-S. 91, 92.
Alekseev S.S. Vyrazhenie osobennostey predmeta sovetskogo grazhdanskogo prava v metode grazhdansko-pravovogo regulirovaniya. Vidy grazhdansko-pravovykh otnosheniy i metod grazhdansko-pravovogo regulirovaniya // V kn.: Antologiya ural'skoy tsivilistiki. 1925–1989 : sb. st.-M., 2001.-S. 155, 156.
Protasov V.N. Chto i kak reguliruet pravo : ucheb. posobie.-M, 1995.-S. 40.
Obshchaya teoriya gosudarstva i prava / pod red. M.N. Marchenko.-M., 1998.-T. 2.-S. 238.
Tamozhennoe pravo : ucheb. / otv. red. A.F. Nozdrachev.-M., 2007.-S. 42, 43.
Tamozhennoe pravo : ucheb. dlya vuzov / pod obshch. red. B.N. Gabrichidze.-5-e izd. pererab. i dop.-M., 2004.-S. 139 – 145.
Sandrovskiy K.K. Tamozhennoe pravo.-Kiev, 1974.-S. 19.
Bakaeva O.Yu., Matvienko G.V. Tamozhennoe pravo : ucheb. / otv. red. N.I. Khimicheva.-M., 2004.-S. 27 (avtor glavy – O.Yu. Bakaeva).
Markov L.N. Tamozhennoe pravo SSSR.-Irkutsk, 1973.-S. 24, 25.
Bakhrakh D.N., Kivalov S.V. Tamozhennoe pravo Rossii.-Ekaterinburg, 1995.-S. 6, 7.
Astafurov N.V. Pravovoe regulirovanie gosudarstvennykh i munitsipal'nykh raskhodov : dis. … kand. yurid. nauk.-Volgograd, 2009.
Tsyrenzhapov Ch.D. Pravovye osnovy gosudarstvennykh i munitsipal'nykh raskhodov : dis. … kand. yurid. nauk.-Tomsk, 2005.
Nersesyants V.S. Filosofiya prava.-M., 2006.-S. 33.
Efimova L.G. Bankovskoe pravo : ucheb. i prakt. posobie.-M.: Izd-vo «BEK», 1994.-S. 4, 5.
Egorova L.Yu. Problemy zashchity publichnykh interesov prokurorom v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom sudoproizvodstve : dis. … kand. yurid. nauk.-M., 2006.-S. 46.
Sofienko M.B. Pravovaya svoboda kak sposob realizatsii individual'noy svobody v sotsial'noy sisteme : dis. … kand. filos. nauk.-Tomsk, 2007.-S. 28-30.
Makinder Kh.Dzh. Geograficheskaya os' istorii // Polis. – 1995.-¹ 4.
Rattsel' F. Chelovechestvo kak yavlenie zhizni // V kn.: Istoriya chelovechestva.-SPb., 2003.-S. 108, 138–153.
Ershov V.V., Ashmarina E.M., Kornev V.N. Ekonomicheskoe pravo i ekonomicheskaya teoriya // Gosudarstvo i pravo.-2015.-¹ 1.-C. 57-71.
Ershov V.V., Ashmarina E.M., Kornev V.N. Ekonomicheskoe pravo: sravnitel'no-pravovoy analiz Germanii, Frantsii, Kitaya i Rossii // Gosudarstvo i pravo.-2014.-¹ 9.-C. 53-64.
Shumilov V.M. Mezhdunarodnoe finansovoe pravo : ucheb. – M.: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2005. – S. 42–45.
Shumilov V.M. Mezhdunarodnoe finansovoe pravo : ucheb.-2-e izd. – M.: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2011. – S. 100.

References (transliteration):
Sorokin P. A. Chelovek. Tsivilizatsiya. Obshchestvo / /.Obshch. red., sost. i predisl. A. Yu. Sogomonov: Per. s angl. M.: Politizdat, 1992. [Sorokin P. A. Man. Civilization. Society], ed. A. Iu. Sogomonov (1992).
Toynbi A. Postizhenie istorii. M. 1991. S.731 {A. Toynbee, Comprehension of History] (1991}.
Kuzyk B.N., Yakovets Yu.V.-Tsivilizatsii: teoriya, istoriya, dialog, budushchee. 6 tomov. [2006-2009, PDF, RUS] ;Kuzyk B. N., Yakovets Yu. V. Tsivilizatsii: teoriya, istoriya, dialog, budushchee // T. III: Severnoe Prichernomor'e — prostranstvo vzaimodeystviya tsivilizatsiy. — M.: Institut ekonomicheskikhstrategiy, 2008. — S. 18. [B. N. Kuzyk and Iu. V. Iakovets, Civilization: Theory, History, Dialogue, Future/ (2006-2009), III].
Almond G and Verba S. The Civil Culture .Princeton.1963
Legrand P. Fragment on Law-in-Culture. P.1999; LEGRAND P. Le droit comparé, P., 4ème édition, R.2011.
The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law/ ed. by M.Reimann, R.Zimmermann. Oxford. 2008.P.631.[ See M. Reimann and R. Zimmermann (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (2008), p. 631.]
Rossiyskaya gazeta [Russian Newspaper], 1 July 2014.
Hamon F., Troper M. Droit constitutionnel.30e éd.; 2007, p. 79. Sm.:Toynbi A. Postizhenie istorii. M. 1991. S.73
Petrova G.V. Mezhdunarodnoe finansovoe pravo : ucheb. dlya vuzov. – M.: Yurayt; Vysshee obrazovanie, 2009. – S. 15, 16.
Lisovskiy V.I. Sushchnost' i sistema mezhdunarodnogo finansovogo prava // Sov. ezhegodnik mezhdunarodnogo prava (1964-1965). – M.: Nauka, 1966. – S. 134, 135.
Lisovskiy V.I. Mezhdunarodnoe torgovoe i finansovoe pravo. – M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1974.
Veral'skiy M. Rets. na kn.: Shpiller G. Valyutnaya monopoliya i mezhdunarodnye finansovye otnosheniya // Finance.-1963.-¹ 3.
Rovinskiy E.A. K voprosu o predmete mezhdunarodnogo finansovogo prava // Trudy VYuZI. – M., 1967. – T. 9. Voprosy sovetskogo finansovogo prava.
Rovinskiy E.A. Mezhdunarodnye finansovye otnosheniya i ikh pravovoe regulirovanie // Sov. gosudarstvo i pravo.-1965.-¹ 2.-S. 60-68.
Vinnitskiy D.V. Mezhdunarodnoe dogovorno-pravovoe regulirovanie i sovremennoe byudzhetnoe pravo // Ocherki byudzhetno-pravovoy nauki sovremennosti : monografiya / pod obshch. red. E.Yu. Grachevoy i N.P. Kucheryavenko. – M.; Khar'kov, 2009.
Al'tshuler A.B. Mezhdunarodnoe valyutnoe pravo. – M: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1984.
Popondopulo V.F. Mezhdunarodnoe kommercheskoe pravo. — SPb., 2004.
Vel'yaminov G.M. Mezhdunarodnoe ekonomicheskoe pravo i protsess (Akademicheskiy kurs) : ucheb.-M.: Volters Kluver, 2006.
Shumilov V.M. Mezhdunarodnoe finansovoe pravo : ucheb.-2-e izd. – M.: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2011. – S. 27.
Mezhdunarodnaya finansovaya sistema: vyzovy XXI veka : monografiya / red., per. M.A. Shapovalov. – M.: Buki Vedi, 2013. – S. 14.
Petrova G.V. Mezhdunarodnoe finansovoe pravo : ucheb. dlya vuzov. – M.: Yurayt; Vysshee obrazovanie, 2009. – S. 17.
Shumilov V.M. Mezhdunarodnoe ekonomicheskoe pravo : ucheb.-metod. posobie. 2-e izd. – M.: OOO IKK «DeKA», 2002. – S. 42.
Rukavishnikova I.V. Metod finansovogo prava : avtoref. dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk.-Saratov, 2004.
El'kind P.S. Sushchnost' sovetskogo ugolovno-protsessual'nogo prava.-LGU, 1963.-S. 91, 92.
Alekseev S.S. Vyrazhenie osobennostey predmeta sovetskogo grazhdanskogo prava v metode grazhdansko-pravovogo regulirovaniya. Vidy grazhdansko-pravovykh otnosheniy i metod grazhdansko-pravovogo regulirovaniya // V kn.: Antologiya ural'skoy tsivilistiki. 1925–1989 : sb. st.-M., 2001.-S. 155, 156.
Protasov V.N. Chto i kak reguliruet pravo : ucheb. posobie.-M, 1995.-S. 40.
Obshchaya teoriya gosudarstva i prava / pod red. M.N. Marchenko.-M., 1998.-T. 2.-S. 238.
Tamozhennoe pravo : ucheb. / otv. red. A.F. Nozdrachev.-M., 2007.-S. 42, 43.
Tamozhennoe pravo : ucheb. dlya vuzov / pod obshch. red. B.N. Gabrichidze.-5-e izd. pererab. i dop.-M., 2004.-S. 139 – 145.
Sandrovskiy K.K. Tamozhennoe pravo.-Kiev, 1974.-S. 19.
Bakaeva O.Yu., Matvienko G.V. Tamozhennoe pravo : ucheb. / otv. red. N.I. Khimicheva.-M., 2004.-S. 27 (avtor glavy – O.Yu. Bakaeva).
Markov L.N. Tamozhennoe pravo SSSR.-Irkutsk, 1973.-S. 24, 25.
Bakhrakh D.N., Kivalov S.V. Tamozhennoe pravo Rossii.-Ekaterinburg, 1995.-S. 6, 7.
Astafurov N.V. Pravovoe regulirovanie gosudarstvennykh i munitsipal'nykh raskhodov : dis. … kand. yurid. nauk.-Volgograd, 2009.
Tsyrenzhapov Ch.D. Pravovye osnovy gosudarstvennykh i munitsipal'nykh raskhodov : dis. … kand. yurid. nauk.-Tomsk, 2005.
Nersesyants V.S. Filosofiya prava.-M., 2006.-S. 33.
Efimova L.G. Bankovskoe pravo : ucheb. i prakt. posobie.-M.: Izd-vo «BEK», 1994.-S. 4, 5.
Egorova L.Yu. Problemy zashchity publichnykh interesov prokurorom v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom sudoproizvodstve : dis. … kand. yurid. nauk.-M., 2006.-S. 46.
Sofienko M.B. Pravovaya svoboda kak sposob realizatsii individual'noy svobody v sotsial'noy sisteme : dis. … kand. filos. nauk.-Tomsk, 2007.-S. 28-30.
Makinder Kh.Dzh. Geograficheskaya os' istorii // Polis. – 1995.-¹ 4.
Rattsel' F. Chelovechestvo kak yavlenie zhizni // V kn.: Istoriya chelovechestva.-SPb., 2003.-S. 108, 138–153.
Ershov V.V., Ashmarina E.M., Kornev V.N. Ekonomicheskoe pravo i ekonomicheskaya teoriya // Gosudarstvo i pravo.-2015.-¹ 1.-C. 57-71.
Ershov V.V., Ashmarina E.M., Kornev V.N. Ekonomicheskoe pravo: sravnitel'no-pravovoy analiz Germanii, Frantsii, Kitaya i Rossii // Gosudarstvo i pravo.-2014.-¹ 9.-C. 53-64.
Shumilov V.M. Mezhdunarodnoe finansovoe pravo : ucheb. – M.: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2005. – S. 42–45.
Shumilov V.M. Mezhdunarodnoe finansovoe pravo : ucheb.-2-e izd. – M.: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2011. – S. 100.

Review: The subject of this research is the peculiarities, characteristics and stochastic qualities of the borderline legal relations, unadapted and foreign to the values of the normative sphere. The author pays particular attention on the issues of causality of committing legal violations motivated by both, the objective factors (political, economic, cultural, and others), as well as personal-psychological factors, which in their totality determine the negative effect of the legal (juridical) marginality as a self-organizing, open, and dynamic system upon the quality of modern Russian law and order. The article substantiates the conclusion on the reasonableness of the use of synergistic methodological principles and schemes within theoretical jurisprudence, presented within the experience of general legal theory of marginality. On the example of interpretational model of application of synergistic approach the author justifies the hypothesis on the possible implementation of this approach in study of complex legal systemic constructs by the juridical science.

Keywords: bifurcation, causality of legal violations, synergystic approach, methodology, interdisciplinary methodology, legal marginality, dissipation, nonlinearity, marginal behavior, disposition

References:
Shundikov K.V. Sinergeticheskiy podkhod v pravovedenii. Problemy metodologii i opyt teoreticheskogo primeneniya : monografiya. – M.: Yurlitinform, 2013. – S. 231
Rybakov O.Yu. Strategiya prava: V poiskakh garmonii lichnosti i gosudarstva // Strategii pravovogo razvitiya Rossii : monografiya / koll. avt.; pod red. O. Yu. Rybakova. — M.: YuSTITsIYa, 2015. – S. 9-16.
Stepanenko R.F. Ponyatie, osnovnye vidy i napravleniya pravovoy politiki v sfere pravovogo regulirovaniya protsessov marginalizatsii // Pravo i politika. – 2014.-¹ 4 (172). – S. 493-504. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.4.11711
Stepanenko R.F., Stepanenko G.N. Metafizicheskie nachala obshchepravovoy kontseptsii marginal'nosti // Filosofskie perspektivy: Moskovsko-Kazanskiy sb. II Sadykovskie chteniya, 24-25 oktyabrya 2014 goda. – Kazan': Izd-vo Kazan. un-ta, 2014. – Vyp. II.-S. 66-73.
Reshetov Yu.S, Metodologicheskie problemy otechestvennogo prava // Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. – Kazan', 1969. – T. 132. – S. 7, 8.
Stepanenko R.F., Chulyukin L.D. Obshchaya teoriya marginal'nosti: problemy pravovogo podkhoda // Vestnik ekonomiki, prava i sotsiologii. – Kazan'.-2/2011. – S. 96-104.
Matskevich V.V. SMD-metodologiya // Vsemirnaya entsiklopediya: Filosofiya / Gl. nauch. red. i sost. A.A. Gritsanov. – M.: AST, MN.: Kharvest, Sovremennyy literator // Mozheyko M.A. Istina.-2001. – S. 789-794.
Prigozhin I., Stengers I. Poryadok ikh khaosa: Novyy dialog cheloveka s prirodoy / Per. s angl.: obshch. red.. V.I. Arshinova, Yu.L. Klimogtovicha i Yu.V. Sachkova. – M.: Progress, 1986. – S. 269.
Stepanenko R.F. Teoretiko-metodologicheskie problemy obshchepravovoy kontseptsii marginal'nosti // Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. – 2011. – T. 153.-Kn. 4. – S. 30-38.
Bachinin V.A. Entsiklopediya filosofii i sotsiologii prava. – SPb.: Yurid. Tsentr PRESS, 2006.
Rezolyutsiya General'noy Assamblei OON ot 14.12.1990 ¹ 45/112. «Rukovodyashchie printsipy Organizatsii Ob'edinennykh Natsiy dlya preduprezhdeniya prestupnosti sredi nesovershennoletnikh. (Rukovodyashchie printsipy, prinyatye v Er-Riyade)» http://base.garant.ru/12123837/
Stepanenko R.F. Institutsional'noe soderzhanie obshchepravovoy teorii marginal'nosti: monografiya / Pod red. O.Yu. Rybakova. – Kazan': «Universitet upravleniya «TISBI», 2015. – 172 s.
Stepanenko R.F. Prichinnost', ponyatie i vidy pravovoy marginal'nosti // Gosudarstvo i pravo. – 2014. – ¹ 6. – S. 99–100.
Stepanenko R.F. Genezis obshchepravovoy teorii marginal'nosti: monografiya / Pod red. O.Yu. Rybakova – Kazan': «Universitet upravleniya «TISBI», 2012. – S. 12-60.

References (transliteration):
Shundikov K.V. Sinergeticheskiy podkhod v pravovedenii. Problemy metodologii i opyt teoreticheskogo primeneniya : monografiya. – M.: Yurlitinform, 2013. – S. 231
Rybakov O.Yu. Strategiya prava: V poiskakh garmonii lichnosti i gosudarstva // Strategii pravovogo razvitiya Rossii : monografiya / koll. avt.; pod red. O. Yu. Rybakova. — M.: YuSTITsIYa, 2015. – S. 9-16.
Stepanenko R.F. Ponyatie, osnovnye vidy i napravleniya pravovoy politiki v sfere pravovogo regulirovaniya protsessov marginalizatsii // Pravo i politika. – 2014.-¹ 4 (172). – S. 493-504. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.4.11711
Stepanenko R.F., Stepanenko G.N. Metafizicheskie nachala obshchepravovoy kontseptsii marginal'nosti // Filosofskie perspektivy: Moskovsko-Kazanskiy sb. II Sadykovskie chteniya, 24-25 oktyabrya 2014 goda. – Kazan': Izd-vo Kazan. un-ta, 2014. – Vyp. II.-S. 66-73.
Reshetov Yu.S, Metodologicheskie problemy otechestvennogo prava // Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. – Kazan', 1969. – T. 132. – S. 7, 8.
Stepanenko R.F., Chulyukin L.D. Obshchaya teoriya marginal'nosti: problemy pravovogo podkhoda // Vestnik ekonomiki, prava i sotsiologii. – Kazan'.-2/2011. – S. 96-104.
Matskevich V.V. SMD-metodologiya // Vsemirnaya entsiklopediya: Filosofiya / Gl. nauch. red. i sost. A.A. Gritsanov. – M.: AST, MN.: Kharvest, Sovremennyy literator // Mozheyko M.A. Istina.-2001. – S. 789-794.
Prigozhin I., Stengers I. Poryadok ikh khaosa: Novyy dialog cheloveka s prirodoy / Per. s angl.: obshch. red.. V.I. Arshinova, Yu.L. Klimogtovicha i Yu.V. Sachkova. – M.: Progress, 1986. – S. 269.
Stepanenko R.F. Teoretiko-metodologicheskie problemy obshchepravovoy kontseptsii marginal'nosti // Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. – 2011. – T. 153.-Kn. 4. – S. 30-38.
Bachinin V.A. Entsiklopediya filosofii i sotsiologii prava. – SPb.: Yurid. Tsentr PRESS, 2006.
Rezolyutsiya General'noy Assamblei OON ot 14.12.1990 ¹ 45/112. «Rukovodyashchie printsipy Organizatsii Ob'edinennykh Natsiy dlya preduprezhdeniya prestupnosti sredi nesovershennoletnikh. (Rukovodyashchie printsipy, prinyatye v Er-Riyade)» http://base.garant.ru/12123837/
Stepanenko R.F. Institutsional'noe soderzhanie obshchepravovoy teorii marginal'nosti: monografiya / Pod red. O.Yu. Rybakova. – Kazan': «Universitet upravleniya «TISBI», 2015. – 172 s.
Stepanenko R.F. Prichinnost', ponyatie i vidy pravovoy marginal'nosti // Gosudarstvo i pravo. – 2014. – ¹ 6. – S. 99–100.
Stepanenko R.F. Genezis obshchepravovoy teorii marginal'nosti: monografiya / Pod red. O.Yu. Rybakova – Kazan': «Universitet upravleniya «TISBI», 2012. – S. 12-60.