Abstract: The article raises the problem of the place of environmental law and its structural components during the dialogue between the two scientists. The system of law is built by the legislator, but it should be considered the real prevailing construction of norms, institutions and brunches in the legal system of a particular State. Outcome of this situation is seen in the consolidation in the legal system of the concept of an integrated brunch as an element of the law structure. Moreover, the integrated brunch of law can be constructed only in the secondary structure of law. With this approach, it must be assumed that the land, mining, water and forest law are the branches of law: environmental law as an integrated branch, when natural resource law and nature protection law as subinstitutes of integrated branch. What is above is a family of brunches or an integrated brunch. Land, mining, water and forest law are common branches of law.

Keywords: civil law, natural resource law, land law, nature protection law, environmental law, integrated branch of law, overbranch, superbranch, branch of legislation, differentiation of legal branches.

References:
Abdraimov B.Zh., Bogolyubov S.A. Zemel'noe pravo Rossii i Kazakhstana: problemy razvitiya, protsessual'nye formy realizatsii. Monografiya. M.: Yurist', 2006.
Baydel'dinov D.L., Bekisheva S.D. Ekologicheskoe pravo Respubliki Kazakhstan: Uchebnoe posobie. – Almaty: Izd.tsentr OFPPI «Interligal», 2004.
Baysalov S.B., Mukhitdinov N.B. Osnovy ekologicheskogo prava, – Osnovy gosudarstva i prava. T. 2 – Almaty: Zheti Zhargy, 1999.
Bogolyubov S.A. Pravotvorchestvo v sfere ekologii. M.: EKSMO, 2010.
Bogolyubov S.A. Sovremennye problemy ekologicheskogo kodeksa// Sb. Materialov nauchno-prakt. konferen-tsiy. M. MGU. Forgreyfer, 2009.
Brinchuk M.M. Ekologicheskoe pravo (pravo okruzhayushchey sredy): Uchebnik dlya vuzov. – M.: Yurist', 1998.
Golichenkov A.K. Ekologicheskoe pravo Rossii: slovar' yuridicheskikh terminov. M. 2008.
Erofeev B.V. Ekologicheskoe pravo: Uchebnik dlya vuzov. – M.: Novyy Yurist, 1998. S. 87–88.
Instituty ekologicheskogo prava (ruk. avt. koll. S.A.Bogolyubov). M.: E

Abstract: The article reveals the urgent environmental challenges and state-legal response to them of modern society. The views and information of other sciences: ecology, economics and political science are presented. Ecological function of the state is given in close relationship with many other its functions. Particular attention is paid to the financial mechanism for the transition to a green economy, which should be based on non-waste production. The urgency and scale of the ecological crisis inevitably brings to life the multifaceted ecological function of the modern state. By historical standards, the ecological function is new, but its significance in today's society and the state increases day by day. By the beginning of the twenty-first century this function is a constant, which requires the carrying out of regular measures and costs. Like any function of the state, it has its own subject, content, field of activity and different ways of the impact. The differences between the state-legal impact on the ecological relationships in Russia and in neighboring Norway are determined. The experience of the BRICS countries and the European Union is given. It is pointed out that Russia still lags behind many other members of the international community in the field of protection of nature.

Keywords: environmental crisis, environmental law, tax, oil policy, business entity, the owner, green investments, environmental technologies, Norway, ecological function of the state.

References:
Bartenev S.A. Ekonomicheskie teorii i shkoly (istoriya i sovremennost'): kurs lektsiy. M.: Izdatel'stvo BEK, 1996.
Bogolyubov S.A.. Ekologizatsiya zakonodatel'stva , gosudarstva i obshchestvennoy zhizni. Pravo i ekologiya: materialy VIII ShMU (Moskva, 23–24 maya 2013 g.)/ Otv. red. Yu.A.Tikhomirov, S.A. Bogolyubov. – M.IZiSP. Infra-M. 2014. S.33–38;
Vengerov A.B. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava. Tret'e izdanie. M. Izd-vo «Yurisprudentsiya». 2000.
Golichenkov A.K.. Ekologicheskoe pravo Rossii: slovar' yuridicheskikh terminov. M. «Gorodets». 2012.
Elyubaev Zh. Problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya ekologicheskikh otnosheniy v Kazakhstane. Pravo i ekologiya: materialy VIII ShMU (Moskva, 23–24 maya 2013 g.) / Otv. red. Yu.A.Tikhomirov, S.A. Bogolyubov. – M.IZiSP. Infra-M. 2014.
Instituty ekologicheskogo prava/pod red. Bogolyubova S.A. M.: IZiSP. 2010.
Kolbasov O.S. Zaveshchanie ekologam // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2000. № 5–6.
Sivakov D.O. Tendentsii pravovogo regulirovaniya vodokhozyay

Abstract: Present analytical article reveals a number of problems in the legal fishing industry. The author discloses the procedure for the use of marine biological resources in accordance with the laws of Russia and foreign countries. Recommendatory provisions of international legal instruments are also discussed.

Keywords: fishery, aquaculture, legislation, fish industry fleet, fishing quota, authorization, agreements.

References:
Bogolyubov S.A. i dr. Instituty ekologicheskogo prava. M.: IZiSP, Eksmo, 2010. S. 345–362.
Vylegzhanin A.N., Zilanov V.K. Mezhdunarodno-pravovye osnovy upravleniya morskimi zhivymi resursami (Teoriya i dokumenty). M.: OAO «NPO Izd-vo «Ekonomika», 2000. s. 537-571.
Kontseptsii razvitiya rossiyskogo zakonodatel'stva / pod red. T.Ya. Khabrievoy, Yu.A. Tikhomirova. M.: IZiSP. Eksmo, 2010. S.459-460.
Krasnova I.O. Ekologicheskoe pravo SShA: issledovanie teorii i praktiki razvitiya. — Mezhdunarodnaya aka-demiya informatizatsii. Otdelenie prav cheloveka, 1996. S. 22, 200.
Sivakov D.O. Rybopromyslovyy flot: prakticheskie trudnosti frakhtovaniya i registratsii // Agrarnoe i ze-mel'noe pravo. 2011. №4. S. 42-44

Abstract:

Keywords: zemlya

References:
Banchuk O.A. Problemi teor?? ta praktiki ?nspekts?yno? d?yal'nost? publ?chno? adm?n?strats?? v Ukra?n? / Banchuk O.A. K.: Konus-Yu, 2009. 272 s.
Golovk?n O.V. ?nspektuvannya yak forma derzhavnogo kontrolyu u galuz? okhoroni dovk?llya v Ukra?n? / O.V. Golovk?n // Chasopis Ki?vs'kogo un?versitetu prava. 2011. №
S. 2330236. 3. Gorodets'ka ?.A. Adm?n?strativno-yurisdikts?yna d?yal'n?st' derzhavnogo ?nspektora z kontrolyu za viko-ristannyam ta okhoronoyu zemel': avtoref. dis. na zdobuttya nauk. stupenya kand. yurid. nauk: spets. 12.00.07 «Adm?n?strativne pravo ? protses; f?nansove pravo; ?nformats?yne pravo» / ?.A. Gorodets'ka. K., 2010. 19 s.
Gorodets'ka ?. Napryami vdoskonalennya adm?n?strativno-yurisdikts?yno? d?yal'nost? derzhavnogo ?nspektora z kontrolyu za vikoristannyam ta okhoronoyu zemel' / ?. Gorodets'ka // P?dpri?mnitstvo, gospodarstvo ? pravo. 2009. № 12. S. 215-219.
Andr?yko O.F. Derzhavniy kontrol' v Ukra?n?: organ?zats?yno-pravov? zasadi / Andr?yko O.F. K.: Naukova dum-ka, 2004

Abstract: Forming a unified framework and discussion of state environmental policy includes the need to develop environmental education, environmental, chemical, biological, energy security of Russia, the strengthening of state supervision and control of social and productive in the field of environmental protection, while ensuring freedom of entrepreneurial activities in accordance with the law. The author of this article puts forward counter ideas in the sphere of woods and fauna legislation of Russia.

Keywords: unified state environmental policy, natural environment, natural resources and objects, woods, habitat, fishery, hunting, ecological crisis, legislation, ship quota, legal monitoring.

References:
Egorov E. Prioritety resheniya flotskikh problem // Rybokhozyaystvennyy kompleks. Informatsionno–anali-ticheskiy vestnik. 2009. Oktyabr'. S. 43–47
«Monitoring zakonodatel'stva o lesakh i zhivotnom mire». M.: Yurisprudentsiya. IZZiSP. 2011 g. 352 s.; re-daktsionnaya kollegiya: S.A. Bogolyubov, D.B. Gorokhov, D.O. Sivakov
Polyanskaya G.N. Izbrannoe / Sostaviteli: S.A. Bogolyubov, E.N. Mukhina. M.: Institut zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya pri Pravitel'stve RF, 2010. S. 194.
Pravovoy mekhanizm gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniya i podderzhki agropromyshlennogo kompleksa / pod red. S.A. Bogolyubova. M.: IZiSP.Norma, 2009. 496 s.
«Pravovoe obespechenie edinoy gosudarstvennoy ekologicheskoy politiki Rossiyskoy Federatsii» (otv. red. S.A. Bogolyubov, N.I. Khludeneva). M.: IZZiSP–Yustitsinform. 2011. 280 s.
Pravovoy rezhim lesov po zakonodatel'stvu Rossii i zarubezhnykh stran: monografiya / pod red. Yu.I. Shuple-tsovoy. M.: IZiSP. Yustitsinform, 2011. 160 s

Abstract: The article covers political and legal issues in the sphere of environmental protection according to the process of developing and applying nanotechnologies in Russian Federation and United States of America; lists the main criteria of nanosafety, which have been suggested by international nano–community and reveals legal, socio–economic and organizational problems in the mentioned fields in Russian Federation and USA.

Keywords: environmental legislation; enenvironmental safety; nanonechnology; nanoproducts; nanorisks; United S

References:
Osnovy politiki RF v oblasti razvitiya nauki i tekhnologiy na period do 2010 g. i dal'neyshuyu perspekti-vu, utverzhdennye Ukazom Prezidenta RF ot 30 marta 2002 g.
Bosso J. Christopher. Governing Uncertainty: Environmental Regulation in the Age of Nanotechnology. RFF Press (15 Feb 2010). p. 132.
Belokrylova E. The Legal Problems of Nanotechnology Environmental Safety Provision in the Russian Federation: The Foreign Country’s Experience // Nanotechnology Law&Business. 2011. Vol. 8. Issue 3. P. 89.
Monastersky R. The Dark Side of Small: As Nanotechnology Takes Off, Researchers Scramble to Assess its Risks. The Chronicle of Higher Educ. (Sept. 10, 2004).
Research Strategies for Safety Evaluation of Nanomaterials. Part I: Evaluating the Human Health Implications of Exposure to Nanoscale Materials. Toxicol Sci. 2005. №7/8. P. 317.
Monica C. John. Nanotechnology Law. Thomson West (June 2, 2010). P. 403–560.
Hodge, Graeme, Bowman, Diana and Karinne Ludlow. New global frontiers in regulati

Abstract: The political and legal characteristics in the sphere of legal provision of ecological safety in the development and application of nanotechnology in the Russian Federation and foreign countries are given. Significant legal issues in this field are highlighted. Comparative legal analysis of relations in the field of environmental safety of nanotechnology in foreign countries is presented. Conclusions and proposals on the application of comparative legal mechanisms for the improvement of Russian legislation in this field are formulateded in the present article.

Keywords: comparative law, the legal environmental security, legal protection of the environment, nanotechnology, nanomaterials, state environmental policy, comparative legal method, nano-risks, the European Union, the conceptual foundations of security.

References:
Matsuura H. Jeffrey. Nanotechnology Regulation and Policy Worldwide. Artech House; 1 edition (July 2006). 206 r.
Grossalberg S. Towards European Strategy for Nanotechnology: Legal and Other Relevant Implications on Europe’s Approach towards Regulation in Nanotechnology. VDM Verlag Dr. Müller (25 Nov 2008). 136 p.
Bosso J. Christopher. Governing Uncertainty: Environmental Regulation in the Age of Nanotechnology. RFF Press (15 Feb 2010). 176 p.
Lacour S. La régulation des nanotechnologies: Clair-obscur normatif. Larcier (6 May 2010). 280 p.
Brownsword R. Rights, Regulation, and the Technological Revolution. OUP Oxford (6 Mar 2008). 300 p.
Hull, M. and Bowman, D. Nanotechnology Environmental Health and Safety: Risks, Regulation and Management (Micro and Nano Technologies). William Andrew (13 Dec 2009). 352 p.
Surhone M. Ambert etc. Regulation of Nanotechnology: Nanotechnology, Regulation, Implications of Nanotechnology, Nanoparticle, United States Environmental Protection. I

Abstract: Threats of global ecological safety on an example of mechanisms of decrease in emissions of the hotbed gases provided by the Kyoto protocol to the Frame convention of the United Nations about climate change are considered in the present article. The policy of the Russian Federation on realization of the Kyoto protocol, including is standard-legal maintenance of its requirements in the legislation of the Russian Federation is analyzed.

Keywords: the Kyoto protocol, the Frame convention of the United Nations on climate change, global ecological safety, the carbon market.

References:
Vasil'eva M.I. Pravovoe obespechenie realizatsii Kiotskogo protokola // Na puti k ustoychivomu razvi-tiyu Rossii: Byulleten'. Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki. 2003. Vyp. 25.
Vinter G. Predislovie k sborniku «Mul'tiurovnevoe upravlenie global'nymi ekologicheskimi izmene-niyami. Perspektivy s pozitsii nauki, sotsiologii i prava» // Ekologicheskoe pravo. 2006. № 6.
Danilov-Danil'yan V.I., Zalikhanov M.Ch., Losev K.S. Global'naya i lokal'naya ekologicheskaya bezopasnost' v kontekste natsional'noy bezopasnosti //Ekologicheskaya bezopasnost'. Obshchie printsipy i rossiyskiy aspekt M.: MNEPU, 2001;
Danilov-Danil'yan V.I. Obespechenie global'noy ekologicheskoy bezopasnosti // Ekologicheskaya bezopasnost'. Obshchie printsipy i rossiyskiy aspekt / V.I. Danilov-Danil'yan, M.Ch. Zalikhanov, K.S. Losev. M. 2001.
Zav'yalov S. Opyt realizatsii Kiotskogo protokola v Respublike Belarus' // Lesnaya gazeta. 2008. № 2-3.
Zav'yalova L. Opyt konkursnogo otbora investorov dlya proektov MChR v Uzbekistane // Lesnaya