Review: The article gives a comparative analysis of the legislation in the sphere of public health protection in Ukraine and the European regulatory framework for the protection of patients\' rights. Medico-legal regulation of carrying out the preventive health interventions such as vaccinal prevention and tuberculin diagnostics is considered. The right to consent and refusal to comply with medical intervention is compared. The possibilities of realization of the rights of citizens to obtain affordable, free and quality health care and the prohibition of any form of discrimination on the grounds of financial resources, place of residence, kind of illness or time of access to care are analyzed. The classification of types of medical care provided in the public health system in Ukraine: ambulance, outpatient, inpatient, as well as regulatory support of medical activities are presented. The right of citizens to access information about their health and to ensure the confidentiality of personal information of the patient, as during his lifetime and after his death, the provisions of health information discloser to family members of the patient, depending on the condition of the patient and the opinion of the treating physician are subjected to analyses.

Keywords: European Charter of Patients' Rights, the rights of patients in the Ukrainian legislation, legal regulation of public health in Ukraine, legal regulations of the carrying out of medical interventions, the right of patients to receive information.

References:
1. Evropeyskaya khartiya prav patsientov // Medichne pravo. – 2010. – № 6 (II). – S. 56–66.
2. Polozhennya pro dostupnіst' medichnoї dopomogi, priynyate 40-yu Vsesvіtn'oyu medichnoyu asambleєyu, Vіden',
Avstrіya, veresen' 1988 roku // Prava lyudini v sistemі vzaєmovіdnosin «lіkar–patsієnt» v vіdkritomu
suspіl'stvі. – K.: Meditsina Ukraїni, 2000. – S. 81–83.
3. Etichniy kodeks lіkarya Ukraїni, priynyatiy ta pіdpisaniy na Vseukraїns'komu z’їzdі lіkars'kikh organіzatsіy ta
Kh Z’їzdі Vseukraїns'kogo lіkars'kogo tovaristva v m. Єvpatorіya 27.09.2009 r. // Medichne pravo. – 2010. – № 5
(I). – S. 115–123.

References (transliteration):
1. Evropeyskaya khartiya prav patsientov // Medichne pravo. – 2010. – № 6 (II). – S. 56–66.
2. Polozhennya pro dostupnіst' medichnoї dopomogi, priynyate 40-yu Vsesvіtn'oyu medichnoyu asambleєyu, Vіden',
Avstrіya, veresen' 1988 roku // Prava lyudini v sistemі vzaєmovіdnosin «lіkar–patsієnt» v vіdkritomu
suspіl'stvі. – K.: Meditsina Ukraїni, 2000. – S. 81–83.
3. Etichniy kodeks lіkarya Ukraїni, priynyatiy ta pіdpisaniy na Vseukraїns'komu z’їzdі lіkars'kikh organіzatsіy ta
Kh Z’їzdі Vseukraїns'kogo lіkars'kogo tovaristva v m. Єvpatorіya 27.09.2009 r. // Medichne pravo. – 2010. – № 5
(I). – S. 115–123.

Review: The article contains the comparative legal analysis of the regulations of the collective contracts and treaties in the Labour Code of the Mongolia and in the Labour Code of the Russian Federation. The attention is paid to the problem and positive legal norms regulating collective contracts and treaties and correlation between the collective and individual labour contracts in the Labour Code of the Mongolia.

Keywords: Labour Code of the Mongolia, collective agreement, collective treaty, labour contract, employees, trade unions, employers representatives.

References:
1. Toriyn medeelel. 1999. № 5.
2. Sm.: Silin A.A. Mesto i znachenie sotsial'nogo partnerstva v regulirovanii trudovykh otnosheniy na Zapade
i v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Zakonodatel'stvo. 2000. № 8. S. 63-65.
3. V Rossii i Mongolii ne ratifitsirovana Konventsiya MOT № 154 o sodeystvii kollektivnym peregovoram
(1981 g.), v sootvetstvii s kotoroy k osushchestvlyaemym gosudarstvennymi organami meram sodeystviya razvi-
tiyu kollektivnykh peregovorov otnosyatsya, v chastnosti, predvaritel'nye konsul'tatsii (st. 7) // Konventsii
i rekomendatsii, prinyatye Mezhdunarodnoy konferentsiey truda. 1957-1990. T. II. Zheneva, Mezhdunarodnoe
byuro truda, 1991.
4. Sm., napr.: Kommentariy k Trudovomu kodeksu RF /otv. red. Yu.P. Orlovskiy. M., 2009. S. 149.
5. Narangerel S. Pravovaya sistema Mongolii. Ulan-Bator-Moskva, 2004. S. 87.
6. Rekomendatsiya MOT № 91 o kollektivnykh peregovorakh (1981 g) // Konventsii i rekomendatsii, prinyatye Mezh-
dunarodnoy konferentsiey truda. 1957-1990. T. II. Zheneva, Mezhdunarodnoe byuro truda, 1991.
7. Lyutov N.L. Kollektivnoe trudovoe pravo Velikobritanii. M., 2009. S. 71-72.
8. Predusmotrena takzhe administrativnaya otvetstvennost' dolzhnostnykh lits za narushenie garantiy pred-
stavitelyam rabotnikov pri razreshenii voznikshikh v khode peregovorov kollektivnykh trudovykh sporov
(st. 141.1.9 TK Mongolii).
9. Kiselev I.Ya. Trudovoe pravo Rossii i zarubezhnykh stran. Mezhdunarodnye normy truda. M., 2005. S. 427.
10. Kiselev I.Ya. Sravnitel'noe trudovoe pravo. M., 2005. S. 260.
11. Saktoev V.E., Banzaragchiyn B. Stanovlenie i funktsionirovanie rynka truda Mongolii: monografiya. Ulan-
Ude, 2007. S. 15.

References (transliteration):
1. Toriyn medeelel. 1999. № 5.
2. Sm.: Silin A.A. Mesto i znachenie sotsial'nogo partnerstva v regulirovanii trudovykh otnosheniy na Zapade
i v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Zakonodatel'stvo. 2000. № 8. S. 63-65.
3. V Rossii i Mongolii ne ratifitsirovana Konventsiya MOT № 154 o sodeystvii kollektivnym peregovoram
(1981 g.), v sootvetstvii s kotoroy k osushchestvlyaemym gosudarstvennymi organami meram sodeystviya razvi-
tiyu kollektivnykh peregovorov otnosyatsya, v chastnosti, predvaritel'nye konsul'tatsii (st. 7) // Konventsii
i rekomendatsii, prinyatye Mezhdunarodnoy konferentsiey truda. 1957-1990. T. II. Zheneva, Mezhdunarodnoe
byuro truda, 1991.
4. Sm., napr.: Kommentariy k Trudovomu kodeksu RF /otv. red. Yu.P. Orlovskiy. M., 2009. S. 149.
5. Narangerel S. Pravovaya sistema Mongolii. Ulan-Bator-Moskva, 2004. S. 87.
6. Rekomendatsiya MOT № 91 o kollektivnykh peregovorakh (1981 g) // Konventsii i rekomendatsii, prinyatye Mezh-
dunarodnoy konferentsiey truda. 1957-1990. T. II. Zheneva, Mezhdunarodnoe byuro truda, 1991.
7. Lyutov N.L. Kollektivnoe trudovoe pravo Velikobritanii. M., 2009. S. 71-72.
8. Predusmotrena takzhe administrativnaya otvetstvennost' dolzhnostnykh lits za narushenie garantiy pred-
stavitelyam rabotnikov pri razreshenii voznikshikh v khode peregovorov kollektivnykh trudovykh sporov
(st. 141.1.9 TK Mongolii).
9. Kiselev I.Ya. Trudovoe pravo Rossii i zarubezhnykh stran. Mezhdunarodnye normy truda. M., 2005. S. 427.
10. Kiselev I.Ya. Sravnitel'noe trudovoe pravo. M., 2005. S. 260.
11. Saktoev V.E., Banzaragchiyn B. Stanovlenie i funktsionirovanie rynka truda Mongolii: monografiya. Ulan-
Ude, 2007. S. 15.

Review: In the article the legislation on financial liability of the parties of a labour relationship under the legislation of the Russian Federation and Republic of Belarus is compared with regard to the guidelines provided by the Concept of the Model Labour Code. The author pays particular attention to the generalities of both Labour Codes, facilitating the approximation of the legislation under study of both countries, and the differences preventing such approximation. The guidelines of the Concept of the Model Labour Code and their practical realization within the framework of the national legislation are also touched upon.
Key words: comparative law, Model Labour Code, approximation of the legislation, Russian Federation, the Republic of Belarus, damage, liability, employee, employer, level

Contact information: Arkhimandritova Marina Aleksandrovna, labour@izak.ru

Review: The article is devoted to the development of Franco-German model of social legislation within the framework of globalization based on the latest normative acts of Germany and France, and international legal instruments on social protection. Particular attention is paid to the changes of the relevant legislation and labour relations of France and Germany within the framework of globalization which, according to the author, negatively affect the functioning of the systems of social protection. The author also takes up tendencies in the labour-market within the framework of globalization, such as the individualization of labour relations, atypical forms of employment, etc.
Key words: comparative law, social legislation, Franco-German model, globalization, labour relations, labour-market, social protection

Contact information: Aleksandrova Anna Vladimirovna, jzsp@izak.ru