Abstract: The research of secretive collection of manuscripts sheds light upon the historical views, cultural interests, and life circumstances of Bogolep Adamov (the second half of the XVII century – January 13, 1727). The sources contain some information on the activity of the bishop in his new eparchy, created by the Tsar Feodor III Alexeyevich according to the plan of religious education of his subjects. The rest of the facts about Bogolep Adamov, from his last name and his life path in the Chudov Monastery and Alexander Nevsky Lavra in Moscow and St. Petersburg respectively, to his episcopal consecration on January 25, 1719, are known from his books and manuscripts. One of them, which in the author’s opinion is most personal, and thus especially valuable, was the subject of this research. From methodical perspective, the work indicates the norm that is advisable to observe in describing a manuscript of the XVII century. It is demonstrated how a consistent codicological analysis of the manuscript collection allows tracing the entire history of its creation, and which research methods, starting with textology, reveal its content. Having examines the reasoning of Bogolep Adamov, the author also gets familiar   with the booklore of that time. Considerable attention is given to the archeographic explorations that give an idea of the partially preserved library of the bishop, formed in the last quarter of the XVII – first quarter of the XVIII centuries. As a result of the conducted research, Bogolep appears as an educated, traditionally open-minded individual of his era, which began with the reforms of the Tsar Feodor III Alexeyevich and ended with the reforms of Peter the Great, whom in the twilight of his life, the bishop recalls with warmth.

Keywords: Synodik of Kiev, Chrismologion, Concise Moscow chronicler, Chronicler by choice, Concise Chronograph, private handwritten collection, Bogolep Adamov, Veliky Ustyug diocese, Patriarch Joachim, Arseny Sukhanov

References:
Sheremetevskiy V.V. Gelasiy (arkhiepiskop Velikoustyuzhskiy) // Russkiy biograficheskiy slovar'. T. IV. Gaag – Gerbel'. M., Tip. G. Lissnera i D. Sovko, 1991. S. 373–374.
Shamin S.M. Kuranty XVII stoletiya: Evropeyskaya pressa v Rossii i vozniknovenie russkoy periodicheskoy pechati. SPb., Al'yans-Arkheo, 2011. 352 s.
Tvorogov O.V. Drevnerusskie khronografy. L., Nauka, 1975. 320 s.
Cherkasova M.S. Velikoustyuzhskiy arkhiereyskiy dom: otkrytie i nachal'nyy etap deyatel'nosti (1682–1700 gg.) // Vestnik tserkovnoy istorii. 1/2 (45/46). M., Pravoslavnaya entsiklopediya, 2017. S. 193–271.
Suvorov N.I. Ob ierarkhakh byvshey Velikoustyuzhskoy eparkhii // Vologodskie eparkhial'nye vedomosti. 1869. ¹ 13. C. 469–479.
Pyat' pisem Bogolepa k Novgorodskomu arkhiepiskopu Feodosiyu (Yanovskomu) // Opisanie arkhiva Aleksandro-Nevskoy lavry za vremya tsarstvovaniya imp. Petra Velikogo (1717–1719 gg.). SPb., 1911. T. 2. X s., 1928 stb. Stb. 905–924.
Stroev P.M. Bibliologicheskiy slovar' i chernovye k nemu materialy // Sbornik Otdeleniya russkogo yazyk

Abstract: This article is dedicated to parish libraries of the XVIII-XIX centuries. The author examines the library acquisition and functionality throughout the centuries. The subject of this research is the library of the Church of Praise of the Mother of God in Orel-Gorodok (in the XIX century – the village of Orlinskoe, currently the town of Orel, Perm Krai). Located in the administrative center of the vast Stroganov’s estates, in the XVII – early XVIII centuries the church was under the patronage of the prominent family, which is reflected in numerous book contributions. Later on, the clergy of parish and parishioners took charge of the church. Among them are the clergy dynasties of Gorbunov, Korovin, Smyshlyaev, etc., as well as peasants. The library collection was constantly changing; 12 out of 62 books were removed from during the XVII – XVIII centuries. By the end of the XIX century (based on handwriting of the note), the collection of the church library contained no fewer than 33 books: No. 33 is the highest number identified on the books that previously belonged to this church. It is worth noting that 33 (53%) were attributed to liturgical publications, 25 (40%) –  educational books, 3 (5%) – Holy Scripture, and 1 (2%) – legislative normative texts. Despite the fact that the oldest books were removed from the church library, the early printed books were preserved in its collection up to the end of the XX century.

Keywords: clergy, book contributions, Cyrillic books, old printed editions, Smyshlyaevs, Stroganovs, library, Church, existence, storage

References:
Postnikov A.B. Sud'ba starykh bibliotek pskovskikh tserkvey // Pskov. Nauchno-prakticheskiy, istoriko-kraevedcheskiy zhurnal. 2008. ¹ 29. s. 29-56.
Sapunov B.V. Kniga v Rossii v XI-XIII vv. [Tekst] / Pod red. S.P. Luppova.-Leningrad : Nauka. Leningr. otd-nie, 1978.-231 s.
Luppov S. P. Kniga v Rossii v poslepetrovskoe vremya. 1725-1740. — L., 1976.-378 s.;
Pozdeeva I.V. Zapisi na staropechatnykh knigakh kirillovskogo shrifta kak istoricheskiy istochnik // Fedorovskie chteniya. 1976. Chitatel' i kniga: Sbornik nauchnykh trudov. M., 1978. S. 39-54.
Luppov S. P. Kniga v Rossii v XVII veke. – L.: Nauka, 1970.-224 s.;
Luppov S. P. Kniga v Rossii v pervoy chetverti XVIII veka. — L.: Nauka, 1973.-284 s.;
Kirillicheskie izdaniya XVIII vv. v khranilishchakh Permskoy oblasti: katalog. – Perm': Pushka, 2008.-800 s.
Kirillicheskie izdaniya XVI-XVII vv. v khranilishchakh Permskoy oblasti: katalog. – Perm': Permskoe knizhnoe izd-vo, 2003. – 487 s.;
Krasikov A.N. Biblioteki sel'skikh prikhodskikh tserkvey Evropeyskogo Severa Rossii v seredi

Abstract: The research subject of this article is the issues behind the organization and technical provisions of the award institutions of various White Guard armies during the Civil War in Russia. The authors analyze the problems of administrative, production-technical and personnel nature that appeared during the development and production of award groups belonging to various White Guard formations and governments. Additionally, the approaches and possibilities of "whites" and "reds" in forming award systems are compared. The authors examine the supply channels of White Guard units and divisions of award insignia and raw materials for their production, and distinguish the specific features of the White Guard award system. The article is based on the principles of historicism, objectivity, systematics, and the methodological basis of this research is the historical-genetic method. The multilateral analysis of the many disparate objects (awards) allowed the authors to draw general conclusions about the specific problems and particularities in the White Guard award system and to highlight the elements of continuity and novelty in this system. The novelty of this study lies in the abandonment of the traditional individual-descriptive approach to award systems and the identification of common issues and approaches in White Guard governments regarding their award systems, with the emphasis being placed on organizational and production-technical difficulties. The authors point to various means of organizing the production of awards (pre-revolutionary reserves, centralized command orders, personal initiatives of unit commanders, placing orders abroad, etc.) and sources of raw materials (melting tsarist awards, confiscations of jeweler and church goods, gold reserves, etc.). The common problems of various White Movement branches were reflected in their award system: lack of a unified system, limited raw materials and production capabilities, drop in quality. It was precisely their attempts to create an award system with a limited set of resources that made the White Guard award system a unique phenomenon.

Keywords: faleristics, Jewelry, White Movement, Russian Civil war, medals, award system, decorations, emigration, enamel, precious metals

References:
Rudichenko A. I. Nagrady i znaki Belykh armiy i pravitel'stv. [Elektronnyy resurs] https://www.arudichenko.com/t-2-r-1-ord-nch (data obrashcheniya 29.08.2018).R
Rudichenko A. I. Nagrady i znaki belogo dvizheniya / A. I. Rudichenko. – M.: Parad, 2008. – 408 s.
Firma «Eduard» [Elektronnyy resurs] https://podstakanoff.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=888 (data obrashcheniya 20.07.2018).data obrashcheniya 20.07.2018).
Georgievskiy krest na Monetnom dvore // Ogonek. 1915. 1(14) fevr., s. 5-6 [Elektronnyy resurs] http://belrussia.ru/page-id-3470.html (data obrashcheniya 15.01.2018)
Krest iz seti [Elektronnyy resurs] https://ak-group.ru/forum/showthread.php?p=162216 (data obrashcheniya 20.07.2018).
Mozheyko I. Nagrady / I. Mozheyko. – M.: Khronos, 1998. – 464 s.
Pykhalov I. V. Georgievskie kresty dlya «belykh orlov» // Obshchestvo. Sreda. Razvitie (Terra Humana). ¹ 4 (13). 2009. S. 32-40. [Elektronnyy resurs] https://cyberleninka.ru/article/v/georgievskie-kresty-dlya-belyh-orlov (data obrashcheniya 25.08.2018).
Rudichenko A. I. Nagrady imp

Abstract: The subject of this article is the work of Vyatka local historians (N. M. Karinsky, V. A. Tanaevsky, P. N. Luppov) in the first post-revolutionary decade in the study of the history, ethnography and culture of the peoples of the Ural-Volga region with the aim of tracing and preserving parts of oral folk traditions, knowledge and information objectively set up to be organically lost under the conditions of the large-scale social cataclysms of the late 19th - first third of the 20th centuries. Their work was carried out by developing plans and questionnaires to collect data directly from the public. The aim of the here-presented article is to determine the origin, composition and informational resources of documentary collections formed as a result of the work of the Vyatka Scientific Research Institute of Local History. The research was carried out on the basis of the most complete detection of primary historical and ethnographical materials in archival depositories, in contemporary and retrospective publications, with consequent textual and archaeographic analysis, source study and identification of informational opportunities. The article's author established that the work of the Institute of Local Studies in Vyatka in the study of the peoples of the region is most fully reflected in the materials of the Udmurt Institute of History, Language and Literature of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, the state archive of the Kirov region and the State Archives of the Russian Federation, and local history periodicals of the 1920s. The most interesting of the identified sources are the questionnaires on the daily life of the regional peasantry, the existence of customary laws in the Soviet pre-kholkhoz villages and the "ethnographic break" in the culture and traditions of rural residents at the turn of the 19th - 20th centuries. The particular value of the identified sources lies in the uniqueness of the information they carry, as well as in the aim of the survey organizers to take into account the complex ethnic composition of the local population.

Keywords: revolution, peasantry, archeography, historical and documentary heritage, Luppov, Tanaevsky, Karinsky, local studies, Ural-Volga region, Vyatka region

References:
Ayplatov G.N., Ivanov A.G., Ivanov A.A. Izuchenie material'noy i dukhovnoy kul'tury mariytsev v 20–30-kh godakh XX veka // Vestnik NII gumanitarnykh nauk pri Pravitel'stve Respubliki Mordoviya. – Saransk, 2012. – ¹ 3. – S. 139–147.
Berdinskikh V.A. Istorik na grani epokh: Pavel Luppov – pervyy istorik udmurtskogo naroda. – Izhevsk: Udmurtskoe kn. izd-vo, 1991. – 125 s.
Blyakher Ya. Sovremennoe zemlepol'zovanie po dannym spetsial'noy ankety TsSU 1922 g. // Vestnik statistiki. – M., 1923. – ¹ 1–3. – S. 131–152.
Vyatskiy pedagogicheskiy institut im. V.I. Lenina (1918–1928). – Vyatka, 1928. – 120 s.
Goremyka L. Kratkiy obzor deyatel'nosti Vyatskogo NII kraevedeniya (1922–1928) // Mariy El. – Yoshkar-Ola, 1929. – ¹ 6.
Gosudarstvennyy arkhiv Kirovskoy oblasti (GAKO). – F. R-1266. – Op. 3. – D. 14.
GAKO. – F. R-1266. – Op. 3. – D. 61.
Ivanov A.A. Istoriko-etnograficheskie svedeniya o mariytsakh iz fondov Nauchno-otraslevogo arkhiva Udmurtskogo instituta istorii, yazyka i literatury (po materialam anket Vyatskogo NII kraeveden

Abstract: The presented article continues the author's research in the field of source study of notes in Old Cyrillic books. The subject of this study are the notes that mention a representative of the Stroganov family. The subject is the change in the social status of this family. Initially not possessing a privileged position, during the 17th - 19th centuries the Stroganovs entered the socio-economic, cultural and political elite of the country. The task set before the author was to trace these changes through notes in Old Cyrillic books. In addition, on the example of the Stroganovs, it became possible to trace the changes in attitude of the Russian elite towards publications in the old printed Cyrillic alphabet. The article is based on the materials of the database of notes (identified on the basis of the catalogs of the Old Cyrillic alphabet prepared by the archaeographers of Lomonosov Moscow State University), which the author has been conducting since 2008. For the sake of the conclusions' clarity, the author also used catalogs prepared on the basis of the funds of the State Historical Museum, the Russian State Archive of Ancient Acts, the Russian State Library, and the Library of the Russian Academy of Sciences. As a result, the author was able to trace the changes in the social status of the Stroganov family, which once again shows the systematic nature of the information contained in book notes and the possibility of utilizing them for the reconstruction of various subjects of social history. On the example of the Stroganovs it was possible to demonstrate that the Russian elite played an important role in the distribution of old printed publications of the 16th - 17th centuries. In the 18th century and in the 19th centuries, representatives of the nobility were not involved in the contribution of books to churches and monasteries. The article contains two annexes: a list of 80 books on the basis of which notes were found, and a genealogical list comprising 32 representatives of the family (11 generations) that lived in the 16th - 19th centuries.

Keywords: Stroganov, genealogy, database, church, contributions, book culture, old printed Cyrillic, archeography, notes in books, social history

References:
Asafov K.M., Protas'eva T.N, Tikhomirov M.N. Zapisi na knigakh staroy pechati XVI-XVII vv. // AE za 1961. M., 1962. S. 276-344
Bogdanov V.P. Genealogiya i sud'by semeynykh bibliotek po zapisyam na knigakh staropechatnoy kirillitsy // Vestnik arkhivista. 2017. ¹ 1. S. 269-283.
Bogdanov V.P. Sotsial'nye aspekty bytovaniya staropechatnoy kirillitsy (po zapisyam na ekzemplyarakh donikonovskikh izdaniy) // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 8. Istoriya. 2012. ¹ 1. Yanvar'-fevral'. S. 27-44.
Bulanin D.M. Katalog knig kirillovskoy pechati XVI – XVII vekov muzeya istorii religii i ateizma v Leningrade // Nauchno-ateisticheskie issledovaniya v muzeyakh. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov. L., 1986. S. 17 – 46; 1987. S. 90 – 107; 1988. S. 36 – 70.
Vvedenskiy A.A. Dom Stroganovykh v XVI – XVII vekakh. M.: Sotsegiz, 1962. – 308 s.
Volegov F.A. Khronologicheskiy reestr raznykh dokumentov i sluchae, otnosyashchiesya do istorii o Stroganovykh // Permskiy kray. Vyp. 3. 1895. –Perm', 1895. S. 149 – 175.
Vostokov A.Kh. Opisanie russkikh i slovenskikh rukopise

Abstract: The subject of this research is the phonodocument as a means of social communication. The object of this publication is the particularities of storing phonodocuments in modern digital conditions, revealed on the basis of a systematization of the existing phonoarchive institutions in today's communication space. The relevance of this study is determined by the lack of modern fundamental theoretical and methodological studies focused on this topic. The aim of this article is to identify, within the framework of the development of the whole concept of phonoarchitecture, the trends in the expansion of the limits of the storage phase of technotronic communication in a phonodocumet's life cycle. The author examines the particuliarities of the organization of phonodocument storage systems in different regions of the world. The author notes the basic principles of function and interaction of the storage objects of sound recordings. Additionally, the author reveals the common and distinctive features behind the functioning of national and non-governmental phonoarchives, libraries and museums at the present stage. Particular attention is focused on the specifics of the organization of storage and the use of radiophonodocuments, describing in detail the specifics of the transformation of this subspecies. The methodological basis of this study is composed of the metatheory of social communication ("Noocommunicology"). The author used the methods of comparative analysis, scientific forecasting, terminological analysis, archival studies, interdisciplinary synthesis, and system-functional, historical-genetic and historical-typological approaches. The author discusses the systemic incorporation of the world system of audiovisual archives into the processes of phonodocument communication. The model of phonodocument communication is presented in the form of disconnected elements, organically assembled together and integrated into a balanced system. The novelty of this study lies in its justification of the proposed directions for improving the communication platform for the circulation of archival sound recordings in the new digital environment. The author's special contribution to this topic is his theoretical development of a set of measures for the functional-content segmentation of the logistical channels and the reconstruction of some elements in the phonodocuments' life cycles. The author also undertakes a significant expansion of this research field thanks to an in-depth representation of the innovative developments in the creation of thematic scenarios for the formation of private sound-recording collections and the modernization of corporate sound storage facilities founded on intercompany cooperation. Finally, the author outlines methodical recommendations for designing a budget home music library.

Keywords: phonodocument, technotronic ommunications, life cycle, archival funds, library collections, museum collections, studio storages of master tapes, corporate sound records repositories, philophonic databanks, music cloud web-services

References:
Sineokiy O.V. Galaktika massovogo rekordinga i transformatsionnye problemy audiovizual'noy kul'tury (v filosofskom poiske novoy formuly menedzhmenta i kommunikatsii v usloviyakh tsifrovogo krizisa muzykal'nogo biznesa) / O.V. Sineokiy // Filosofiya sotsial'nykh kommunikatsiy. – 2015. – ¹ 2. – S. 7–17.
Nagrodskaya V.B. Modernizatsiya avtorskikh prav na muzykal'nye proizvedeniya v tsifrovoy srede i modeli otkrytogo kontenta / V.B. Nagrodskaya // Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. – 2015. – ¹ 12 (dekabr'). – S. 66–72.
Galkin D.V. Ispol'zovanie On-line arkhivov v issledovaniyakh sovremennogo iskusstva / D.V. Galkin // Dokument v sisteme sotsial'nykh kommunikatsiy : [sb. mater. III Vseros. nauchno-prakt. konf. s mezhdunar. uchastiem ; red. koll.: N.S. Lar'kov, S.F. Fominykh, O.A. Kharus']. – Tomsk: TGU, 2008. – S. 169–171.
Malinkin A.N. Kollektsioner. Opyt issledovaniya po sotsiologii kul'tury / A.N. Malinkin ; Gos. un-t «Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki». – M. : Izd. dom Gos. un-ta «Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki», 2011. – 192 c.
Sineokiy

Abstract: The study of historical topography is one of the most important fields in the study of Ancient Rus’ town history. This article is based on a complex study of diverse types of sources (chronicles, geological boring material, maps of Novgorod, the icon “the Vision of sexton Tarasiy”, and Old Testament theme) from which three topics are investigated regarding the historical topography of Ancient Novgorod – the largest town centre in Ancient Rus. The first outline examines the long-standing debates concerning the dimensions and locations of land tracts “Kholm” and “Slawno” described in chronicles. Their study has a direct relation to the question of Novgorod’s foundation. The second outline subjects to criticism the existing erroneous assumption of the church of the Archangel Michael being located on the homonymous street in the centre of the oldest Novgorod Torg. It also reconsiders the accepted in historiography translation into the modern chronological format of the chronicle dating of the fire in 6660, the description of which for the first time mentions the abovementioned church. The third outline concerns the identification of the church of Archangel Michael, which, according to the testament of chroniclers, was set on fire by lightning in 1187 (6695).

Keywords: Ancient Novgorod, historical topograhy, chronicle information, ancient landscape, Slawno, Kholm, Torg, Friday auctions, church of Archangel Michael, Biblical theme

References:
Yanin V. L. Ocherki kompleksnogo istochnikovedeniya. Srednevekovyy Novgorod. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1977. 240 s.
Cherepnin L. V. Russkaya khronologiya. M.: Glavnoe arkhivnoe upravlenie NKVD SSSR, Istoriko-arkhivnyy institut, 1944. 93 s., 6 l. tabl.
Kolchin B. A., Khoroshev A. S. Mikhaylovskiy raskop // Arkheologicheskoe izuchenie Novgoroda / pod red. B. A. Kolchina i V. L. Yanina. M.: Nauka, 1978. S. 135-173.
Puteshestvie antiokhiyskogo patriarkha Makariya v Rossiyu v polovine XVII veka, opisannoe ego synom, arkhidiakonom Pavlom Aleppskim. Vyp. 4. M.: Universitetskaya tipografiya, Strastnoy bul'var, 1898. 195 s.
Dal' V. Tolkovyy slovar' zhivogo velikorusskogo yazyka. T. IV. Reprintnoe izdanie. M.: Russkiy yazyk, 1991. 683 s.
Polnoe sobranie russkikh letopisey. T. IV. Ch. I. Vyp. 2. Novgorodskaya chetvertaya letopis'. L.: Izdatel'stvo Akademii nauk SSSR, 1925. 321-536, [4] s.
Polnoe sobranie zakonov Rossiyskoy imperii, s 1649 goda. SPb.: Vtoroe otdelenie Sobstvennoy Ego Imperatorskogo Vel

Abstract: This article discusses the archeological expeditions to South Vyatka (Urzhumsky, Malmyzhsky and Kil’mezensky areas of Kirovskaya Oblast’) organized by Lomonosov Moscow State University in 1999–2015. Diverse ethno-confessional population of these regions aroused constant attention from representatives of various humanity disciplines: historians, archaeographers, philologists, ethnographers, religious studies scholars. Old Believers’ population is represented primarily by three branches of Bezpopovtsy Sect (Filippians, Fedoseevtsy and Pomorian Old-Orthodox Church). Archeographers of Leningrad, Yekaterinburg, Kirov and Moscow studied this sect extensively. This article covers the steps and methodology of research on traditional culture of this region. The author analyzes the practice of implementing written and oral sources into scientific research by LMSU scholars, which was highly acclaimed by their colleagues from various scientific centers in Russia. This article is dedicated to the works and papers of Moscow archeographical expedition which has already produced three edited volumes of primary sources and a dozen academic articles. Experience, gained during complex archeographical studies conducted in the last fifteen years, can be used while researching different ethno-confessional groups in other regions.

Keywords: old believers, traditional culture, peasants, field studies, expeditions, archeografy, historiography, South Vyatka, first World war, integrated approach

References:
Shemyakina O. D. Razryv i preemstvennost' v russkoi kul'turnoi traditsii: opyt dialoga // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. – M., 2011. – ¹ 1. S 106-116.
Shemyakina O. D. Protivorechiya rossiiskogo modern-proekta i traditsionnaya kul'tura. Istoricheskoe nasledie i sovremennyi kontekst // Dialog so vremenem. Vyp. 33. M., 2010. S. 298-320.
Khristoforova O. B. Kolduny i zhertvy: Antropologiya koldovstva v sovremennoi Rossii. – M: OGI, RGGU, 2010. — 432 s.
Filippovskoe rodoslovie: istoricheskie sochineniya staroobryadtsev-filippovtsev Povolzh'ya i Yuzhnoi Vyatki / Publikatsiya, predislovie i kommentarii A. A. Iserova.-M.: Arkheodoksiya, 2004 – 88 s.
Staroobryadchestvo v usloviyakh modernizatsii: issledovaniya i materialy / otv. red. V.P. Bogdanov. –M.: MAKS Press, 2013. – 188 s.
Soldatov A.A. Fedoseevtsy Yuzhnoi Vyatki // Rodina. 2014. ¹ 12. S. 137-139.
Senyavskaya E.S. Psikhologiya voiny v XX v. Istoricheskii opyt Rossii. –M.: ROSSPEN (Rossiiskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya), 1998

Abstract: The object of this study is the author’s family lineage, currently numbering more than a thousand recovered names with direct ancestry. The research subject is focused specifically on the Archugov family, which has been successfully traced through documents to the middle of the 17th century in the Kaigorodskiy and Kungursky uesdzs of Great Perm. The author examines various hypotheses pertaining to the etymology of the family name “Archugov”, traces the settlement paths of members of the Archugov family in the Ural and Siberia, and gives a short list of his own ancestors from the line of Archugovs using archival primary sources (RSAAA, SAPK). The article uses such research methods as the genealogical, hermeneutical, historical, source criticism, chronological, etymological, as well as the method on anti-linguistic reconstruction. For the first time the Perm family of “the Archugovs” is described in great detail, the origin of which is traced to the middle of the 17th century. During the course of the genealogical examination the author was able to establish that the family of the Archugovs divided itself already at the end of the 17th century, part of it remaining in the Perm governorate, while the other part moved to the Tobol governorate. In the middle of the 20th century one of the Kungursky members of the family – the author’s grandfather Ilya Vasilyevich Archugov – intermarried with the Siberian Aleksandra Ivanovna Trunova.

Keywords: Archugovs, genealogy, Kungursky uezd, RSAAA, Sukhaya river, SAPK, Perm governorate, scribe book, audit records, census book

References:
Metricheskaya kniga Nikolaevskoi tserkvi d. Sukhaya rechka Kungurskogo uezda Permskoi gubernii dlya zapisi rodivshikhsya, brakom sochetavshikhsya i umershikh za 1913–1919 gody // Gosudarstvennyi arkhiv Permskogo kraya. F. 719. Op. 7. D. 348. 27a. Metricheskaya kniga g. Kungura dlya zapisi rodivshikhsya, brakom sochetavshikhsya i umershikh za 1880 god // Gosudarstvennyi arkhiv Permskogo kraya. F. 719. Op. 7. D. 161.
Metricheskaya kniga g. Kungura dlya zapisi rodivshikhsya, brakom sochetavshikhsya i umershikh za 1904 god // Gosudarstvennyi arkhiv Permskogo kraya. F. 719. Op. 7. D. 185.
Metricheskaya kniga Svyato-Troitskoi tserkvi s. Staryi posad Osinskogo uezda Permskoi gubernii dlya zapisi rodivshikhsya, brakom sochetavshikhsya i umershikh za 1801–1802 gody // Gosudarstvennyi arkhiv Permskogo kraya. F. 37. Op. 3. D. 77 // [Elektronnyi resurs] – URL: http://pokolenia.permkrai.ru/Perm/F.37.Op.3.D.77/00000228.JPG (data obrashcheniya: 28.10.2015).
Metricheskaya kniga Svyato-Troitskoi tserkvi s. Staryi

Abstract: The object of this article’s research is the history of the symbols of the Republic of Kazakhstan. In view of the fact that heraldry was not inherent to the culture of nomadic people, the first symbols were brought into the territory of modern Kazakhstan by the Russian Empire. The further development of heraldry in Kazakhstan, which was part of the Russian Empire and later of the USSR, occurred synchronically with the development of heraldry in these states. The Republic of Kazakhstan got its first independent symbols after the collapse of the USSR in 1991. However, unlike other countries of the former Soviet Union, these symbols were formalised, registered in a separate law, and described by a standard. Thus, the issue of the ambiguous symbol interpretations was resolved and the nation’s flag and coat of arms were made to correspond in colour, thereby allowing them to be seen as a unified artistic composition. This article demonstrates not only the strong sides in the composition of the Kazakhstan coat of arms and flag, but also examines their chief inaccuracies, which are of a dogmatic nature. This research utilised the historical approach which illuminated the geopolitical phenomena and prerequisites in creating the coat of arms of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The historical and comparative method – along with the historical-genetic method – exposed the possible continuity from old territorial coats of arms to the state’s modern coat of arms. All of the above listed methods have allowed to identify the main reference points of this research. The main conclusion of the article amounts to the observation that the Kazakhstan coat of arms, despite having a number of dogmatic mistakes, nonetheless was made with scrupulousness and artistic taste. It symbolises peace, welfare, and prosperity of the people. The symbolics of the coat of arms show an integrative vector in the state’s development. The coat of arms and the flag of Kazakhstan in their structure and symbolism are similar to the symbols of the Republic of Belarus – the author notes their same continuity from the symbols of the Soviet era. The heraldry of the Republic of Kazakhstan leans toward its development within the framework of the Euroasian Union, and the Kazakhstan experience of heraldic standardisation can be used as a model for other states in this integrative association.

Keywords: symbols of Kazakhstan, territory of Kazakhstan, flag, emblem mistakes, history of Kazakhstan, coat of arms, heraldry, political system, heraldic prognostic aspects, symbol standardisation

References:
Valeev F. Kh., Valeeva-Suleymanova G. F. Drevnee iskusstvo Tatarii. Kazan': Tatarskoe knizhnoe izdatel'stvo, 1987. 204 s.
Vinkler P. P. Gerby gorodov, guberniy, oblastey i posadov Rossiyskoy imperii, vnesennye v polnoe sobranie zakonov s 1649 po 1900 god. SPb.: Tipografiya Komelova I. M., 1899. 307 s.
Potseluev V. A. Gerby Soyuza SSR: iz istorii razrabotki. M.: Politizdat, 1987. 166 s.
Zagoruyko M. V. Simvoly respubliki Armeniya – geopoliticheskoe zerkalo gosudarstva // Politika i obshchestvo. 2015. ¹ 1. C. 80–90.
Ashcheulov A. T. Konstitutsionnoe pravo Respubliki Kazakhstan. Almaty: KazGYuA, 2001. 656 s.
Zagoruyko M. V. Gosudarstvennye simvoly Belorussii: istoriya i znachenie // Genesis: istoricheskie issledovaniya. 2015. ¹ 1. C. 36–58. DOI: 10.7256/2409-868X.2015.1.13999.
O gosudarstvennykh simvolakh Respubliki Kazakhstan // Vedomosti parlamenta Respubliki Kazakhstan. 1996. ¹ 1. S. 178.
O gosudarstvennykh simvolakh Respubliki Kazakhstan // Kazakhstanskaya pravda. 5 iyunya 2007.