Abstract: This article attempts to analyze the genesis of the Russian thinker P. Y. Chaadaev, as well as antinomy of his views upon the historical fate and mission of Russia in the global cultural-historical process. The author analyzes the process of reevaluation on the brink of the two latest centuries, and ways of overcoming and exit from this systemic crisis. The subject of this work is Chaadaev’s outlook upon the fate of Russia, humanity, and Christianity in their assemblage, development, and transformation that were studied in close relation with the history of spiritual and intellectual establishment of the thought. The scientific novelty consists in the fact that this work represents a special research of Chaadaev’s views upon the fate of Russia, in which his ideas are examined in combination, development, and transformation based on his well-known publications in tight connection with his spiritual and intellectual formation. Russian thinkers is studied not from the perspective of a representative of particular sociopolitical doctrine, but rather an “living” person with independent ideologies, who completely dedicates himself to cognition of this world, and repeatedly but sincerely changes his point of view upon the historical designation of Russia and Orthodoxy.

Keywords: Religion, Tradition, Values, Nihilism, Catholicism, Orthodoxy , Providentialism, West, Russia, P. Y. Chaadaev

References:
Toporov V. N. Svyatost' i svyatye v russkoy dukhovnoy kul'ture. T. 2. M., 1998. 902 s.
Shaposhnikov L.E. Filosofiya sobornosti: Ocherki russkogo samosoznaniya. S.-Peterburg. 1996. 200 s
Parilov O.V. Russkaya ideya: ot Drevney Rusi k Novomu vremeni: Monografiya. N. Novgorod: NPA, 2005. S. 76.
Zen'kovskiy V. V. Russkie mysliteli i Evropa: Kritika Evropeyskoy kul'tury u russkikh mysliteley / V.V. Zen'kovskiy. 2-e izd. Parizh: Ymcf-Press, 1955. 282 s.
Khomyakov A.S. O starom i novom. M., 1994. T. 2. S. 12.
Kireevskiy I.V. Izbrannye stat'i. M., 1984. Izdanie: Sovremennik. 384 s.
Shaposhnikov L.E. Filosofiya i dogmaticheskoe bogoslovie v Rossi. SPb, SPbGU, 1998. 128 s.
Tarasov B. N. P. Ya. Chaadaev i russkaya literatura pervoy poloviny XIX veka // Chaadaev P. Ya. Stat'i i pis'ma.
Chaadaev P.Ya. Apologiya sumasshedshego. Sobr. soch., M., 1989. S. 65.
Tarasov B. N. Prostranstvo mysli Petra Chaadaeva // Literaturnaya gazeta. 1992. 11 marta. S. 11.
Kamenskiy 3. A. O sovremennykh prochteniyakh P. Ya. Chaadaeva // Voprosy filosofii. 1992. ¹ 12. S. 56.
Khoros V. G. Iz neopublikovannogo naslediya P. Ya. Chaadaeva // Voprosy filosofii. 1983. ¹ 12. S. 22.
Kamenskiy 3. A. Chaadaev P. Ya. // Filosofskaya entsiklopediya. M., 1970. T. 5. S 54.
Zen'kovskiy V. V. Istoriya russkoy filosofii. L., 1991. T. 1. Ch. 1. S. 167.
Florovskiy G. V. Puti russkogo bogosloviya. Vil'nyus, 1991. S. 21.
Merezhkovskiy D.S. Revolyutsiya i religiya / P.Ya. Chaadaev: pro et contra. C. 309-318.
Gershenzon M.O. Griboedovskaya Moskva. P.Ya. Chaadaev. Ocherki proshlogo. M., 1989. 400 s.
Chaadaev P. Ya. Stat'i i pis'ma. M., 1989. 624 s.
Shaposhnikov L.E., Pushkin S.N. Russkaya istoriosofiya: izbrannye shkoly i personalii.– SPb: Izdatel'stvo RKhSA, 2014. 464 s.
Odoevskiy V. F. Russkie nochi / Izdanie podgotovili B. F. Egorov, E. A. Maymin, M. I. Medovoy. L.: Nauka, 1975. 319 s.
Berdyaev N. A. Russkaya ideya. Sud'ba Rossii. M.: ZAO «Svarog i K», 1997. 543 s.
Zen'kovskiy V. V. Istoriya russkoy filosofii: V 2 t. Rostov na / D: «Feniks», 1999. 544 s.
Ul'yanov N. I. «Bassmannyy filosof» // Voprosy filosofii. 1990. ¹ 8. S. 70–83.
Gradovskiy A. D. Sochineniya. Russkaya gosudarstvennaya mysl' SPb Nauka, 2001. 512 s.
Kiselev A.F. Perechityvaya Chaadaeva // Vysshee obrazovanie segodnya. 2008. ¹5. S. 10–13.
Goerdt W. Russische Philosophie Zugang und Durchblicke. Freiburg-Munchen, 1984. 768 s.

References (transliteration):
Toporov V. N. Svyatost' i svyatye v russkoy dukhovnoy kul'ture. T. 2. M., 1998. 902 s.
Shaposhnikov L.E. Filosofiya sobornosti: Ocherki russkogo samosoznaniya. S.-Peterburg. 1996. 200 s
Parilov O.V. Russkaya ideya: ot Drevney Rusi k Novomu vremeni: Monografiya. N. Novgorod: NPA, 2005. S. 76.
Zen'kovskiy V. V. Russkie mysliteli i Evropa: Kritika Evropeyskoy kul'tury u russkikh mysliteley / V.V. Zen'kovskiy. 2-e izd. Parizh: Ymcf-Press, 1955. 282 s.
Khomyakov A.S. O starom i novom. M., 1994. T. 2. S. 12.
Kireevskiy I.V. Izbrannye stat'i. M., 1984. Izdanie: Sovremennik. 384 s.
Shaposhnikov L.E. Filosofiya i dogmaticheskoe bogoslovie v Rossi. SPb, SPbGU, 1998. 128 s.
Tarasov B. N. P. Ya. Chaadaev i russkaya literatura pervoy poloviny XIX veka // Chaadaev P. Ya. Stat'i i pis'ma.
Chaadaev P.Ya. Apologiya sumasshedshego. Sobr. soch., M., 1989. S. 65.
Tarasov B. N. Prostranstvo mysli Petra Chaadaeva // Literaturnaya gazeta. 1992. 11 marta. S. 11.
Kamenskiy 3. A. O sovremennykh prochteniyakh P. Ya. Chaadaeva // Voprosy filosofii. 1992. ¹ 12. S. 56.
Khoros V. G. Iz neopublikovannogo naslediya P. Ya. Chaadaeva // Voprosy filosofii. 1983. ¹ 12. S. 22.
Kamenskiy 3. A. Chaadaev P. Ya. // Filosofskaya entsiklopediya. M., 1970. T. 5. S 54.
Zen'kovskiy V. V. Istoriya russkoy filosofii. L., 1991. T. 1. Ch. 1. S. 167.
Florovskiy G. V. Puti russkogo bogosloviya. Vil'nyus, 1991. S. 21.
Merezhkovskiy D.S. Revolyutsiya i religiya / P.Ya. Chaadaev: pro et contra. C. 309-318.
Gershenzon M.O. Griboedovskaya Moskva. P.Ya. Chaadaev. Ocherki proshlogo. M., 1989. 400 s.
Chaadaev P. Ya. Stat'i i pis'ma. M., 1989. 624 s.
Shaposhnikov L.E., Pushkin S.N. Russkaya istoriosofiya: izbrannye shkoly i personalii.– SPb: Izdatel'stvo RKhSA, 2014. 464 s.
Odoevskiy V. F. Russkie nochi / Izdanie podgotovili B. F. Egorov, E. A. Maymin, M. I. Medovoy. L.: Nauka, 1975. 319 s.
Berdyaev N. A. Russkaya ideya. Sud'ba Rossii. M.: ZAO «Svarog i K», 1997. 543 s.
Zen'kovskiy V. V. Istoriya russkoy filosofii: V 2 t. Rostov na / D: «Feniks», 1999. 544 s.
Ul'yanov N. I. «Bassmannyy filosof» // Voprosy filosofii. 1990. ¹ 8. S. 70–83.
Gradovskiy A. D. Sochineniya. Russkaya gosudarstvennaya mysl' SPb Nauka, 2001. 512 s.
Kiselev A.F. Perechityvaya Chaadaeva // Vysshee obrazovanie segodnya. 2008. ¹5. S. 10–13.
Goerdt W. Russische Philosophie Zugang und Durchblicke. Freiburg-Munchen, 1984. 768 s.

Abstract: The subject of this research is the philosophical and cultural foundations of geopolitical control during the process of the world systemic changes when exiting the global crisis. The object is the philosophical concept of the development of geopoliticology. The relevance of this article is determined by the fact that in 2015 the global crisis is reviewed as a philosophical crisis of the world order and culture of geopolitical control. In the difficult situation of the application of sanctions and geopolitical confrontation, grows the importance of creation of an integral philosophical and cultural concept as a developed scientific theory in the area of geopolitical control. Namely, based on the advancement of the philosophy and culture, theory (methodology) of geopoliticology, the forecasting and scientific substantiation of the possible geopolitical crisis response measure become possible. The goal of this works is the development of philosophical and culturological concept of geopoliticology as the scientific foundation for geopolitical control. The main conclusions consist in the following: clarification of the notions “world order” and “geopolitical control” and their content; establishment of the philosophical and methodological foundations for geopoliticology as a science about world order and geopolitical control over geopolitical processes.

Keywords: theory, control, philosophy, culture, geopolitics, world order, functions, roles, management, forecasting

References:
Sergeev V.M., Kazantsev A.A. Struktury mirovogo poryadka: istoricheskaya tipologiya//Kosmopolis. – 2008. – ¹1(20).
Glushchenko V.V. Gosudarstvologiya i pravologiya (nauka o gosudarstve i prave-obshchaya teoriya gosudarstva i prava): krizisologiya gosudarstva, gosudarstvennoe antikrizisnoe upravlenie.-M.: IP Glushchenko Valeriy Vladimirovich,-S.6
Glushchenko V.V. Gosudarstvo kak geopoliticheskaya publichnaya korporatsiya v usloviyakh postindustrial'nogo global'nogo mira//Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost' ¹ 7(16), 2007,
Sapozhnikova N.T. Protsess globalizatsii i mezhdunarodnye monopolii // Sovremennaya teoriya globalizatsii: ekonomicheskie ocherki. – M.: GUU, 2002, s.63-75.
Bzhezinskiy Z. Velikaya shakhmatnaya doska. Gospodstvo Ameriki i ego geostrategicheskie imperativy. – M.: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2003. – 250 s.
Glushchenko V.V. Nauka o den'gakh: tekhnologicheskaya teoriya deneg.-g. Moskva: IP Glushchenko Valeriy Vladimirovich, 2012. – S. 13-14
Glushchenko V.V. Tekhnologicheskaya teoriya deneg: den'gi, denezhnaya sistema, finansy, kredit, banki – M.: IP Glushchenko Valeriy Vladimirovich, 2009. – 64 s.
Glushchenko V.V. Korporatsii kak sub'ekty upravleniya geopoliticheskim riskom investitsionnoy deyatel'nosti v usloviyakh globalizatsii//Vestnik GUU, ¹1(14), 2006, s. 201-212
Glushchenko V.V. Riski innovatsionnoy i investitsionnoy deyatel'nosti v usloviyakh globalizatsii.-g. Zheleznodorozhnyy, Moskovskaya oblast': OOO NPTs Kryl'ya, 2006. – S. 61
Glushchenko V.V. Finansovye riski v usloviyakh globalizatsii//Finansy i kredit, ¹ 19 (221), 2006, s. 19-25
Kefeli I.F. Filosofiya geopolitiki v kontekste sovremennogo teoreticheskogo znaniya//Politeks, 2013, ¹4,-S.2
Glushchenko V.V. Politologiya: sistemno-upravlencheskiy podkhod.-g. Moskva: IP Glushchenko V.V., 2008. – S. 64
Glushchenko V.V., Glushchenko I.I. Sovershenstvovanie filosofii i metodologii nauki, upravleniya i prognostiki: paradigma intellektual'nogo upravleniya – M.: IP Glushchenko Valeriy Vladimirovich, 2009. , s. 9.
Kuznetsov V.N. Geokul'tura. Osnovy geokul'turnoy dinamiki bezopasnosti v mire XXI. – M.: Kniga i biznes, 2003. – S. 8.
Erokhina E. A.Geopolitika kak nauchnaya distsiplina i kak tip prostranstvennogo proektirovaniya//Vestnik NGU, seriya Filosofiya, 2012, tom 10, vyp.2,-S. 95-101
Global'naya geopolitika / pod red. I.I. Abylgazieva, I.V. Il'ina, I.F. Kefeli. – M.: Izd-vo MGU, 2010. – S. 7.
Filosofiya// Uch. Posob. Dlya vuzov.-izd. 11-e Rostov n/D: Feniks, 2005. s. 542-549.

References (transliteration):
Sergeev V.M., Kazantsev A.A. Struktury mirovogo poryadka: istoricheskaya tipologiya//Kosmopolis. – 2008. – ¹1(20).
Glushchenko V.V. Gosudarstvologiya i pravologiya (nauka o gosudarstve i prave-obshchaya teoriya gosudarstva i prava): krizisologiya gosudarstva, gosudarstvennoe antikrizisnoe upravlenie.-M.: IP Glushchenko Valeriy Vladimirovich,-S.6
Glushchenko V.V. Gosudarstvo kak geopoliticheskaya publichnaya korporatsiya v usloviyakh postindustrial'nogo global'nogo mira//Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost' ¹ 7(16), 2007,
Sapozhnikova N.T. Protsess globalizatsii i mezhdunarodnye monopolii // Sovremennaya teoriya globalizatsii: ekonomicheskie ocherki. – M.: GUU, 2002, s.63-75.
Bzhezinskiy Z. Velikaya shakhmatnaya doska. Gospodstvo Ameriki i ego geostrategicheskie imperativy. – M.: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2003. – 250 s.
Glushchenko V.V. Nauka o den'gakh: tekhnologicheskaya teoriya deneg.-g. Moskva: IP Glushchenko Valeriy Vladimirovich, 2012. – S. 13-14
Glushchenko V.V. Tekhnologicheskaya teoriya deneg: den'gi, denezhnaya sistema, finansy, kredit, banki – M.: IP Glushchenko Valeriy Vladimirovich, 2009. – 64 s.
Glushchenko V.V. Korporatsii kak sub'ekty upravleniya geopoliticheskim riskom investitsionnoy deyatel'nosti v usloviyakh globalizatsii//Vestnik GUU, ¹1(14), 2006, s. 201-212
Glushchenko V.V. Riski innovatsionnoy i investitsionnoy deyatel'nosti v usloviyakh globalizatsii.-g. Zheleznodorozhnyy, Moskovskaya oblast': OOO NPTs Kryl'ya, 2006. – S. 61
Glushchenko V.V. Finansovye riski v usloviyakh globalizatsii//Finansy i kredit, ¹ 19 (221), 2006, s. 19-25
Kefeli I.F. Filosofiya geopolitiki v kontekste sovremennogo teoreticheskogo znaniya//Politeks, 2013, ¹4,-S.2
Glushchenko V.V. Politologiya: sistemno-upravlencheskiy podkhod.-g. Moskva: IP Glushchenko V.V., 2008. – S. 64
Glushchenko V.V., Glushchenko I.I. Sovershenstvovanie filosofii i metodologii nauki, upravleniya i prognostiki: paradigma intellektual'nogo upravleniya – M.: IP Glushchenko Valeriy Vladimirovich, 2009. , s. 9.
Kuznetsov V.N. Geokul'tura. Osnovy geokul'turnoy dinamiki bezopasnosti v mire XXI. – M.: Kniga i biznes, 2003. – S. 8.
Erokhina E. A.Geopolitika kak nauchnaya distsiplina i kak tip prostranstvennogo proektirovaniya//Vestnik NGU, seriya Filosofiya, 2012, tom 10, vyp.2,-S. 95-101
Global'naya geopolitika / pod red. I.I. Abylgazieva, I.V. Il'ina, I.F. Kefeli. – M.: Izd-vo MGU, 2010. – S. 7.
Filosofiya// Uch. Posob. Dlya vuzov.-izd. 11-e Rostov n/D: Feniks, 2005. s. 542-549.

Abstract: The article discusses the process of reception of Byzantine law in Russia as part of the first Russian pseudomorphosis. Considerable attention is paid to the attempt of legal reforms undertaken by Prince Vladimir Svyatoslavich shortly after the beginning of the Christianization of Russia. In particular, the replacement of the traditional vira (fine) as a punishment for murder and "razboynichestvo" with the death penalty is the subject of analysis. The comparison of the two components of the first Russian pseudomorphosis: religious (Christianization) and legal (transformation of laws and practices, the introduction of the ecclesiastical courts, and so on) was carried out. Methodologically, the author relied on traditional methods of analysis, synthesis, systematization as well as the principle of historicism. In his paper Korolev has widely used the conclusions of domestic and foreign philosophers, historians, legal experts and religious scholars resulting from their work on the matter. The author concludes that the legal norms and principles of Byzantium borrowed and adapted in Russia was extremely fragmented. Byzantine law was taking root primarily through the church and the ecclesiastical court. Pseudomorphosis turned out to be a successfully acting, effective mechanism in some areas, especially in religion, and not completely held in others. As a result, the Russian legal system developed not so much by pseudomorphic borrowing but grew out of the old "barbaric" customary law adopting Byzantine rules only partially. 

Keywords: Russia, Rus', blood feud, pseudomorphosis, Christianization, religion, law, reception, court, death penalty, Byzantium

References:
Korolev S.A. Khristianizatsiya kak psevdomorfoza // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2014. ¹ 8.
Bibikhin V.V. Vvedenie v filosofiyu prava. M.: Institut filosofii RAN, 2005.
Zhivov V.M. Razyskaniya v oblasti istorii i predystorii russkoy kul'tury. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoy kul'tury, 2002.
Gurevich A.Ya. Izbrannye trudy. Norvezhskoe obshchestvo. M.: Traditsiya, 2009.
Averintsev S.S. Vizantiya i Rus': dva tipa dukhovnosti // Averintsev S. Drugoy Rim. Izbrannye stat'i. SPb.: Amfora, 2005.
Pouchenie Vladimira Monomakha // Pamyatniki literatury Drevney Rusi. Nachalo russkoy literatury. XI – nachalo XII veka. Vstupit. stat'ya D.S. Likhacheva. Sost. i obshchaya red. D.S. Likhacheva i L.A. Dmitrieva. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1978.
Loba V.E., Malakhov S.N. Ugolovnoe pravo Drevney Rusi XI–XII vv. (po dannym Russkoy Pravdy). Armavir: RIO AGPA, 2011.
Veber M. Politika kak prizvanie i professiya // Veber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. M.: Progress, 1990.
Milov L.V. Velikorusskiy pakhar' i osobennosti rossiyskogo istoricheskogo protsessa. M.: ROSPEN, 1998.
Solov'ev V.S. Vizantizm i Rossiya // Solov'ev V.S. Soch. v 2-kh tt. T. 2. M.: Pravda, 1989.
Froyanov I.Ya. Zagadka kreshcheniya Rusi. M.: Algoritm, 2007.
Poppe A. Le prince et l'Eglise en Russie de Kiev depuis la fin du Xe siècle jusqu'au début de XIIe siècle // Acta poloniae historica. Wroclaw; Warszawa; Krakow, 1969. T. 20.
Poppe A. Państwo i kościół na Rusi w XI wieku. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 1968.
Cherepnin L.V. Obshchestvenno-politicheskie otnosheniya v Drevney Rusi i Russkaya Pravda // Drevnerusskoe gosudarstvo i ego mezhdunarodnoe znachenie. M.: Nauka, 1965.
Ocherk istorii smertnoy kazni v Rossii. Rech', chitannaya na godichnom akte Imperatorskogo Kazanskogo universiteta ordin. prof. N.P. Zagoskinym // Izvestiya i uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta.1892. ¹ 1.
Reyts A. Opyt istorii rossiyskikh gosudarstvennykh i grazhdanskikh zakonov. M.: V Univ. tip., 1836.
Petrukhin V.Ya. Kreshchenie Rusi: ot yazychestva k khristianstvu. M.: AST; Astrel', 2006.
Evers I.F.G. Drevneyshee russkoe pravo v istoricheskom ego raskrytii. SPb., 1835.
Povest' vremennykh let // Pamyatniki literatury Drevney Rusi. Nachalo russkoy literatury. XI – nachalo XII veka. Vstupit. stat'ya D.S. Likhacheva. Sost. i obshchaya red. D.S. Likhacheva i L.A. Dmitrieva. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1978.
Milov L.V. O drevnerusskom perevode vizantiyskogo kodeksa zakonov VIII veka (Eklogi) // Istoriya SSSR. 1976. ¹ 1.
Milov L.V. Legenda ili real'nost'? (O neizvestnoy reforme Vladimira i Pravde Yaroslava) // Drevnee pravo. Ivs antiqvvm. 1996. ¹ 1.
Petrov K.V. K voprosu o retseptsii vizantiyskogo prava v domongol'skoy Rusi // Rus', Rossiya: Srednevekov'e i Novoe vremya. Vyp. 3: Tret'i chteniya pamyati akademika RAN L.V. Milova. Materialy k mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii. M., 2013.
Tomsinov V.A. O sushchnosti yavleniya, nazyvaemogo retseptsiey rimskogo prava // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 11. Pravo. 1998. ¹ 4.
Shchapov Ya.N. Rimskoe pravo na Rusi do XVI v. (Novye aspekty problemy) // Feodalizm v Rossii. Sb. st., posvyashchennyy pamyati L.V. Cherepnina. M.: Nauka, 1987.
Sergeevich V.I. Lektsii i issledovaniya po drevney istorii russkogo prava. 4-e izd., dop. i popr. SPb.: Tipografiya M.M. Stasyulevicha, 1910.
Benemanskiy M.I. Zakon gradskiy. Znachenie ego v russkom prave. M.: Pechatnya A. Snegirevoy,1917.
Akhiezer A., Klyamkin I., Yakovenko I. Istoriya Rossii: konets ili novoe nachalo? 3-e izd., ispr. i dop. M.: Novoe izdatel'stvo, 2013.
Milov L.V. Problemy retseptsii vizantiyskogo prava v Drevney Rusi // Milov L.V. Issledovaniya po istorii pamyatnikov srednevekovogo prava. M.: ROSSPEN, 2009.

References (transliteration):
Korolev S.A. Khristianizatsiya kak psevdomorfoza // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2014. ¹ 8.
Bibikhin V.V. Vvedenie v filosofiyu prava. M.: Institut filosofii RAN, 2005.
Zhivov V.M. Razyskaniya v oblasti istorii i predystorii russkoy kul'tury. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoy kul'tury, 2002.
Gurevich A.Ya. Izbrannye trudy. Norvezhskoe obshchestvo. M.: Traditsiya, 2009.
Averintsev S.S. Vizantiya i Rus': dva tipa dukhovnosti // Averintsev S. Drugoy Rim. Izbrannye stat'i. SPb.: Amfora, 2005.
Pouchenie Vladimira Monomakha // Pamyatniki literatury Drevney Rusi. Nachalo russkoy literatury. XI – nachalo XII veka. Vstupit. stat'ya D.S. Likhacheva. Sost. i obshchaya red. D.S. Likhacheva i L.A. Dmitrieva. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1978.
Loba V.E., Malakhov S.N. Ugolovnoe pravo Drevney Rusi XI–XII vv. (po dannym Russkoy Pravdy). Armavir: RIO AGPA, 2011.
Veber M. Politika kak prizvanie i professiya // Veber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. M.: Progress, 1990.
Milov L.V. Velikorusskiy pakhar' i osobennosti rossiyskogo istoricheskogo protsessa. M.: ROSPEN, 1998.
Solov'ev V.S. Vizantizm i Rossiya // Solov'ev V.S. Soch. v 2-kh tt. T. 2. M.: Pravda, 1989.
Froyanov I.Ya. Zagadka kreshcheniya Rusi. M.: Algoritm, 2007.
Poppe A. Le prince et l'Eglise en Russie de Kiev depuis la fin du Xe siècle jusqu'au début de XIIe siècle // Acta poloniae historica. Wroclaw; Warszawa; Krakow, 1969. T. 20.
Poppe A. Państwo i kościół na Rusi w XI wieku. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 1968.
Cherepnin L.V. Obshchestvenno-politicheskie otnosheniya v Drevney Rusi i Russkaya Pravda // Drevnerusskoe gosudarstvo i ego mezhdunarodnoe znachenie. M.: Nauka, 1965.
Ocherk istorii smertnoy kazni v Rossii. Rech', chitannaya na godichnom akte Imperatorskogo Kazanskogo universiteta ordin. prof. N.P. Zagoskinym // Izvestiya i uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta.1892. ¹ 1.
Reyts A. Opyt istorii rossiyskikh gosudarstvennykh i grazhdanskikh zakonov. M.: V Univ. tip., 1836.
Petrukhin V.Ya. Kreshchenie Rusi: ot yazychestva k khristianstvu. M.: AST; Astrel', 2006.
Evers I.F.G. Drevneyshee russkoe pravo v istoricheskom ego raskrytii. SPb., 1835.
Povest' vremennykh let // Pamyatniki literatury Drevney Rusi. Nachalo russkoy literatury. XI – nachalo XII veka. Vstupit. stat'ya D.S. Likhacheva. Sost. i obshchaya red. D.S. Likhacheva i L.A. Dmitrieva. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1978.
Milov L.V. O drevnerusskom perevode vizantiyskogo kodeksa zakonov VIII veka (Eklogi) // Istoriya SSSR. 1976. ¹ 1.
Milov L.V. Legenda ili real'nost'? (O neizvestnoy reforme Vladimira i Pravde Yaroslava) // Drevnee pravo. Ivs antiqvvm. 1996. ¹ 1.
Petrov K.V. K voprosu o retseptsii vizantiyskogo prava v domongol'skoy Rusi // Rus', Rossiya: Srednevekov'e i Novoe vremya. Vyp. 3: Tret'i chteniya pamyati akademika RAN L.V. Milova. Materialy k mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii. M., 2013.
Tomsinov V.A. O sushchnosti yavleniya, nazyvaemogo retseptsiey rimskogo prava // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 11. Pravo. 1998. ¹ 4.
Shchapov Ya.N. Rimskoe pravo na Rusi do XVI v. (Novye aspekty problemy) // Feodalizm v Rossii. Sb. st., posvyashchennyy pamyati L.V. Cherepnina. M.: Nauka, 1987.
Sergeevich V.I. Lektsii i issledovaniya po drevney istorii russkogo prava. 4-e izd., dop. i popr. SPb.: Tipografiya M.M. Stasyulevicha, 1910.
Benemanskiy M.I. Zakon gradskiy. Znachenie ego v russkom prave. M.: Pechatnya A. Snegirevoy,1917.
Akhiezer A., Klyamkin I., Yakovenko I. Istoriya Rossii: konets ili novoe nachalo? 3-e izd., ispr. i dop. M.: Novoe izdatel'stvo, 2013.
Milov L.V. Problemy retseptsii vizantiyskogo prava v Drevney Rusi // Milov L.V. Issledovaniya po istorii pamyatnikov srednevekovogo prava. M.: ROSSPEN, 2009.

Abstract: The article discusses the attitude of V. V. Rozanov to the classical Slavophilism that today grows important as an essential source of the original Russian philosophical tradition with its focus primarily on the philosophical-historical and anthropological issues. Special attention is paid to Rozanov's critical approach to their heritage as a result of Rozanov's antidogmatic philosophical thinking when Rozanov examines the same phenomenon from different angles. However, despite the criticism, the philosopher acknowledged the deep truth of the main ideas of the representatives of the "Moscow school", who in his opinion represented "the essence of Russia". The author also studies the hidden similarities in the works of Slavophiles and Rozanov, primarily related to the presence of the common key categories ("life", "faith", "love", "creativity", etc), as well as the common themes such as patriotism, family, Russian national character, asceticism and poverty as the main educational tool of the people, the hope for mercy, etc. but not juridism. When analyzing the heritage of Russian philosophers, the author of the article has applied the contextual analysis and personal approach assuming that philosophical theories, concepts, doctrines and ideas cannot be alienated and adequately understood outside the context of spiritual and practical life of their creators. When carrying out the review and analysis of Rozanov's philosophy of history and Slavophiles the researcher has used the dialogical paradigm that involves comparison of their ideas. Based on the analysis of the sources, the author concludes that the work of the representatives of the 'Moscow school' was an organic part of Rozanov's philosophical constructs. It is stated that although there were common categories and terms in the philosophy of Slavophiles and Rozanov's philosophy, those categories and terms were defined differently. The conclusion is that their common intellectual context allowed a continuous dialogue between Rozanov and Slavophiles where the ideas of the representatives of the 'Moscow school' were completed and adopted in accordance with the personal experience of the philosopher and in tune with the Silver Age. 

Keywords: Russian character, faith, Kireevsky, Homjakov, Rozanov, Silver Age, Slavophiles, 'Moscow school', life, gender

References:
Khomyakov A.S. PSS: v 8-mi tt. 1904. T. 8.
Rozanov V.V. Semeynyy vopros v Rossii. M., 2004.
Kireevskiy I.V. Kritika i estetika. M., 1979.
Kireevskiy I. V. Pis'mo ot 6 iyulya 1833 ili 1834 goda.// Kireevskiy I. V., Kireevskiy P. V. PSS: V 4 t. T. 3, Kaluga, 2006.
Kireevskiy I.V. Dnevnik. RGALI F. 236 Op. 1 Ed. khr. 10.
Rozanov V.V. Sochineniya v 2-kh tt. M.,1990. T.2.
Rozanov V.V. Mimoletnoe. Moskva. 1994.
Rozanov V. V. «Legenda o Velikom Inkvizitore» F.M. Dostoevskogo i drugie stat'i: 1891-1892. M.: Progress-Pleyada, 2013. M., 1994.
Fedyakin S.R. Khudozhestvennaya proza Vasiliya Rozanova. Zhanrovye osobennosti. M., 2014.
Losev A.F. Muzyka kak predmet logiki.// Losev A. F. Iz rannikh proizvedeniy. M., 1990. S. 253. Sm. takzhe Rozanov V.V. Miniatyury. M., 2004. S. 30-31.
Pamyati A.S. Khomyakova (1-e maya1804 – 1-e maya 1901 g.) // Novyy put', 1904 ¹6 S. 1-16.; Rozanov V.V. Sobr. Soch. Okolo tserkovnykh sten. M., 1995. S. 419-428. Pominki po slavyanofil'stve i slavyanofilam// Novoe vremya 1904, 21 maya; Rozanov V.V. sobr. Soch. Legenda o Velikom inkvizitore F.M. Dostoevskogo. M.,1996. S. 447-454. A.S. Khomyakov: K 50-letiyu so dnya konchiny ego (23 sentyabrya 1860 – 23 sentyabrya 1910)// Russkoe slovo 1910, 23 sentyabrya. Podpis' V.Varvarin; Rozanov V.V. sobr. Soch. O pisatelyakh i pisatel'stve. M., 1995. S. 456-466. Khomyakov i litergiya na ispanskom yazyke// Novoe vremya 1912, 30 sentyabrya. Vazhnye trudy o Khomyakove// Novoe vremya 1916, 12 oktyabrya. P.A. Florenskiy ob A.S. Khomyakove// Kolokol 1916, 14 i 22 oktyabrya.
Rozanov V. V. «Novoe vremya». 1911. 12 fevralya. ¹12544.
Rozanovskaya entsiklopediya. M.: ROSSPEN, 2008. S.2102-2114.
Rozanov V. V. PSS: V 35 tt. T. 1. O pisatel'stve i pisatelyakh: Legenda o Velikom inkvizitore F.M. Dostoevskogo. Stat'i 1889-1990 gg. SPb: Rostok, 2014.
Rozanov V. V. Sochineniya v 2 tt. T.1. Religiya i kul'tura. M.: pravda, 1990.
Gusev D.A. Mirovozzrencheskaya orientatsiya prepodavatelya sotsial'no-gumanitarnykh distsiplin v obrazovatel'nom protsesse // Obrazovatel'nye resursy i tekhnologii. 2014. ¹ 4 (7). S. 62-69.

References (transliteration):
Khomyakov A.S. PSS: v 8-mi tt. 1904. T. 8.
Rozanov V.V. Semeynyy vopros v Rossii. M., 2004.
Kireevskiy I.V. Kritika i estetika. M., 1979.
Kireevskiy I. V. Pis'mo ot 6 iyulya 1833 ili 1834 goda.// Kireevskiy I. V., Kireevskiy P. V. PSS: V 4 t. T. 3, Kaluga, 2006.
Kireevskiy I.V. Dnevnik. RGALI F. 236 Op. 1 Ed. khr. 10.
Rozanov V.V. Sochineniya v 2-kh tt. M.,1990. T.2.
Rozanov V.V. Mimoletnoe. Moskva. 1994.
Rozanov V. V. «Legenda o Velikom Inkvizitore» F.M. Dostoevskogo i drugie stat'i: 1891-1892. M.: Progress-Pleyada, 2013. M., 1994.
Fedyakin S.R. Khudozhestvennaya proza Vasiliya Rozanova. Zhanrovye osobennosti. M., 2014.
Losev A.F. Muzyka kak predmet logiki.// Losev A. F. Iz rannikh proizvedeniy. M., 1990. S. 253. Sm. takzhe Rozanov V.V. Miniatyury. M., 2004. S. 30-31.
Pamyati A.S. Khomyakova (1-e maya1804 – 1-e maya 1901 g.) // Novyy put', 1904 ¹6 S. 1-16.; Rozanov V.V. Sobr. Soch. Okolo tserkovnykh sten. M., 1995. S. 419-428. Pominki po slavyanofil'stve i slavyanofilam// Novoe vremya 1904, 21 maya; Rozanov V.V. sobr. Soch. Legenda o Velikom inkvizitore F.M. Dostoevskogo. M.,1996. S. 447-454. A.S. Khomyakov: K 50-letiyu so dnya konchiny ego (23 sentyabrya 1860 – 23 sentyabrya 1910)// Russkoe slovo 1910, 23 sentyabrya. Podpis' V.Varvarin; Rozanov V.V. sobr. Soch. O pisatelyakh i pisatel'stve. M., 1995. S. 456-466. Khomyakov i litergiya na ispanskom yazyke// Novoe vremya 1912, 30 sentyabrya. Vazhnye trudy o Khomyakove// Novoe vremya 1916, 12 oktyabrya. P.A. Florenskiy ob A.S. Khomyakove// Kolokol 1916, 14 i 22 oktyabrya.
Rozanov V. V. «Novoe vremya». 1911. 12 fevralya. ¹12544.
Rozanovskaya entsiklopediya. M.: ROSSPEN, 2008. S.2102-2114.
Rozanov V. V. PSS: V 35 tt. T. 1. O pisatel'stve i pisatelyakh: Legenda o Velikom inkvizitore F.M. Dostoevskogo. Stat'i 1889-1990 gg. SPb: Rostok, 2014.
Rozanov V. V. Sochineniya v 2 tt. T.1. Religiya i kul'tura. M.: pravda, 1990.
Gusev D.A. Mirovozzrencheskaya orientatsiya prepodavatelya sotsial'no-gumanitarnykh distsiplin v obrazovatel'nom protsesse // Obrazovatel'nye resursy i tekhnologii. 2014. ¹ 4 (7). S. 62-69.

Abstract: Objectives of historical-philosophical research directly relate to the study of the adoption of world philosophy achievements by the Russian philosophical thought. This makes Russian neo-Kantianism to be an important topic to be under research because to understand Russian history, it is necessary to reconstruct each historical-philosophical movement. The object of research is the creative heritage of S. Hessen, F. Stepun, B. Yakovenko and their thoughts on the historical fate of Russia constitute the subject of research. The methodology of research involves the integrated historical and philosophical analysis of existing sources. In addition, the author has also used the inductive (from particular cases to the overall picture), biographic (to study life and ideology of the philosophers expressed in their private papers), comparative (to compare philosophers’ views within this philosophical school as well as with other philosophical schools) and logic research methods as well as general principles of historical philosophy to trace back the genesis of the ideas. Historical action will always remain an important issue for a discussion and therefore thoughts of S. Hessen, F. Stepun and B. Yakovenko on the historical fate of Russia are topical, too. In this research Storcheus demonstrates that the term ‘historiosophy’ gains an additional connotation and is understood as a holistic approach to the history on the fate and destiny of Russia. Such an approach may go beyond the scope of both history and philosophy.

Keywords: Baden school, neo-Kantianism, Russian philosophy, philosophy of history, historiosophy, F. Stepun, V. Yakovenko, S. Hessen, Wilhelm Windelband, Heinrich Rickert.

References:
Yakovenko B.V. Istoriya Velikoy russkoy revolyutsii: Fevral'sko-martovskaya revolyutsiya i ee posledstviya / Boris Yakovenko; podgot. teksta i vstup. st. A.M.Shitova; primech. A.M.Shitova, O.T.Ermishina. Izdatel'stvo Dom Russkogo Zarubezh'ya im. Aleksandra Solzhenitsyna / Vikmo-M., 2013. 432 s.
Yakovenko B.V. Filosofiya bol'shevizma//Moshch' filosofii.-SPb.: Nauka, 2000. – (Ser. «Slovo o sushchem»).-976 s.S. 878-926
Yakovenko B.V. Moshch' filosofii.-SPb.: Nauka, 2000. – (Ser. «Slovo o sushchem»).-976 s. – S. 274.
Stepun F. Mysli o Rossii. Ocherk V // Stepun F.A. Sochineniya. M.: ROSSPEN, 2000.
Stepun F.A. Zhizn' i tvorchestvo. Izbrannye sochineniya/Fedor Avgustovich Stepun; vstup. stat'ya, sostavlenie i kommentarii V.K. Kantora. – M.: Astrel', 2009. – 807, (9) s.
Yu.B. Melikh. Plyuralisticheskiy bol'shevizm B.V. Yakovenko: mezhdu nauchnost'yu i ubezhdennost'yu (Iz istorii sotsial'no-politicheskikh idey v Rossii)//Boris Valentinovich Yakovenko/ pod red. A.A. Ermicheva. – M.: Rossiyskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya (ROSSPEN), 2012. – 551 s.: il. – (Filosofiya Rossii pervoy poloviny XX v.).
Povilaytis V.I. Chto est' istoriya? Versii russkogo zarubezh'ya: monografiya. – Kaliningrad : Izdatel'stvo RGU im. I.Kanta, 2009. – S.81
Rikkert// Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya : v 4 t./ In-t filosofii RAN; Nats. obshchestv.-nauch. fond; Preds. nauchno-red. soveta V.S. Stepin. — M.: Mysl', 2000—2001.
Stepun F. A. Pis'mo L.F. Zurovu. Myunkhen, 14 aprelya 1959 g. Biblioteka-fond Russkoe zarubezh'e. F3, op.1 k.2 ed. khr. 132.
Stepun F. A. Byvshee i nesbyvsheesya. Izd-e vtoroe, ispr. SPb., 2000.
Sizemskaya I.N. Idei natsional'nogo messianizma: lovushki i pozitivnye osnovaniya istoriosofskoy refleksii // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2013.-6.-C. 388-421. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.6.642. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_642.html
Kantor V.K. Artisticheskaya epokha i ee posledstviya (po stranitsam Fedora Stepuna)/Voprosy literatury. 1997, ¹ 2
Koptseva N.P. Nekotorye kontsepty sotsial'nykh idealov russkoy filosofii Serebryanogo veka // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2014.-3.-C. 47-59. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2014.3.11325. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_11325.html
Boris Valentinovich Yakovenko/ pod red. A.A. Ermicheva. – M.: Rossiyskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya (ROSSPEN), 2012. – 551 s.: il. – (Filosofiya Rossii pervoy poloviny XX v.).
Gessen S.I. Izbrannye sochineniya – M.: «Rossiyskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya» (ROSSPEN), 1998. – 814 s.
Gessen S.I. – M.: Izdatel'skiy Dom Shalvy Amonashvili, 2004. – S 224 (Antologiya gumannoy pedagogiki).

References (transliteration):
Yakovenko B.V. Istoriya Velikoy russkoy revolyutsii: Fevral'sko-martovskaya revolyutsiya i ee posledstviya / Boris Yakovenko; podgot. teksta i vstup. st. A.M.Shitova; primech. A.M.Shitova, O.T.Ermishina. Izdatel'stvo Dom Russkogo Zarubezh'ya im. Aleksandra Solzhenitsyna / Vikmo-M., 2013. 432 s.
Yakovenko B.V. Filosofiya bol'shevizma//Moshch' filosofii.-SPb.: Nauka, 2000. – (Ser. «Slovo o sushchem»).-976 s.S. 878-926
Yakovenko B.V. Moshch' filosofii.-SPb.: Nauka, 2000. – (Ser. «Slovo o sushchem»).-976 s. – S. 274.
Stepun F. Mysli o Rossii. Ocherk V // Stepun F.A. Sochineniya. M.: ROSSPEN, 2000.
Stepun F.A. Zhizn' i tvorchestvo. Izbrannye sochineniya/Fedor Avgustovich Stepun; vstup. stat'ya, sostavlenie i kommentarii V.K. Kantora. – M.: Astrel', 2009. – 807, (9) s.
Yu.B. Melikh. Plyuralisticheskiy bol'shevizm B.V. Yakovenko: mezhdu nauchnost'yu i ubezhdennost'yu (Iz istorii sotsial'no-politicheskikh idey v Rossii)//Boris Valentinovich Yakovenko/ pod red. A.A. Ermicheva. – M.: Rossiyskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya (ROSSPEN), 2012. – 551 s.: il. – (Filosofiya Rossii pervoy poloviny XX v.).
Povilaytis V.I. Chto est' istoriya? Versii russkogo zarubezh'ya: monografiya. – Kaliningrad : Izdatel'stvo RGU im. I.Kanta, 2009. – S.81
Rikkert// Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya : v 4 t./ In-t filosofii RAN; Nats. obshchestv.-nauch. fond; Preds. nauchno-red. soveta V.S. Stepin. — M.: Mysl', 2000—2001.
Stepun F. A. Pis'mo L.F. Zurovu. Myunkhen, 14 aprelya 1959 g. Biblioteka-fond Russkoe zarubezh'e. F3, op.1 k.2 ed. khr. 132.
Stepun F. A. Byvshee i nesbyvsheesya. Izd-e vtoroe, ispr. SPb., 2000.
Sizemskaya I.N. Idei natsional'nogo messianizma: lovushki i pozitivnye osnovaniya istoriosofskoy refleksii // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2013.-6.-C. 388-421. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.6.642. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_642.html
Kantor V.K. Artisticheskaya epokha i ee posledstviya (po stranitsam Fedora Stepuna)/Voprosy literatury. 1997, ¹ 2
Koptseva N.P. Nekotorye kontsepty sotsial'nykh idealov russkoy filosofii Serebryanogo veka // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2014.-3.-C. 47-59. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2014.3.11325. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_11325.html
Boris Valentinovich Yakovenko/ pod red. A.A. Ermicheva. – M.: Rossiyskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya (ROSSPEN), 2012. – 551 s.: il. – (Filosofiya Rossii pervoy poloviny XX v.).
Gessen S.I. Izbrannye sochineniya – M.: «Rossiyskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya» (ROSSPEN), 1998. – 814 s.
Gessen S.I. – M.: Izdatel'skiy Dom Shalvy Amonashvili, 2004. – S 224 (Antologiya gumannoy pedagogiki).

Abstract: Within the framework of his concept of pseudomorphic development of Russia, the author of the present article views the most important and crucial phase of the first Russian pseudomorphosis — adoption of Christianity as the national religion and Christianization of the Old Russia. The author bases himself on the supposition that Christianization was a pseudomorphic process by nature. The Russian macosociety acquired a socio-cultural ‘cover’ while the cultural content, in particular, paganism, was suppressed and therefore had to develop and survive in those confines for quite a long period of time. The term ‘pseudomorphosis’ was introduced by Spengler. The author of the present article views pseudomorphosis as the process imposing a certain cultural cover to macrosociety under which particular autochthonic contents or certain socio-cultural patterns, practices and life activities have to exist and develop further (or to exist and degrade). In particular, the author analyzes the phenomenon of the ‘dual faith’. The author distinguishes the dual faith developed before the Christianization of the Kievan Rus’ that assumed the parallel development of paganism and Christianity and the dual faith after adoption of Christianity by Vladimir Sviatoslavovich the Great when paganism existed under the Christian cover imposed on the Russian society. As a component of the pseudomorphic process the author also views the interaction between the Russian culture of chronicle writing and spoken pagan mythological tradition. The author notes that a new type of literature, the chronicle, transformed and deformed the mythological tradition created in pagan oral Russia. The author offers a term “local pseudomorphoses”, i.e. the pseudomorphoses appearing locally but containing all signs and mechanisms of global pseudomorphoses. As an example of the local pseudomorphosis the author studies the process of Christianization of pagan ‘foreigners’ in the Volga region and the Urals in the XVIII-XIX centuries. Finally, the author analyzes a peculiar phenomenon of pseudomorphic inversion when under the influence of certain circumstances the suppressed autochthonic content revives and creates a threat to the cultural cover imposed on society. In particular, the author discusses the phenomenon of Christened Muslims leaving Orthodoxy throughout the XIX century.

Keywords: pseudomorphosis, culture, Christianization, paganism, dual faith, folk religion, Islam, inversion, chronicles, Russia, Spengler.

Contact information: Korolev Sergey Alekseevich, 119991, Russia, Moscow, Volkhonka str., h. 14/1, bld. 5, room No. 428.

References:
Froyanov I.Ya. Istoricheskie realii v letopisnom skazanii o prizvanii varyagov // Voprosy istorii. 1991. ¹ 6.
Khamayko N. Drevnerusskoe «dvoeverie»: proiskhozhdenie, soderzhanie i adekvatnost' termina // RUTHENICA. 2007. ¹ 6.
Shpengler O. Zakat Evropy. Ocherki morfologii mirovoy istorii. T.2. Vsemirno-istoricheskie perspektivy. M.: Mysl', 1998.
Syzranov A.V. Islam v Astrakhanskom krae. Astrakhan': Izdatel'skiy dom «Astrakhanskiy universitet», 2007.
Tolochko A.P. Knyaz' v Drevney Rusi. Vlast', sobstvennost', ideologiya. Kiev: Naukova dumka, 1992.
Froyanov I.Ya. Zagadka kreshcheniya Rusi. M.: Algoritm, 2007.
Malov E. O tatarskikh mechetyakh v Rossii // Pravoslavnyy sobesednik. 1867. Kn. 12.
Ponyatov A.N. Nekotorye aspekty perekhoda kreshchenykh tatar iz pravoslaviya v islam v Kazanskoy gubernii vo vtoroy polovine XIX – nachale XX vv. // http://www.missiakryashen.ru/history/isss/Ponytov/
Rybakov B.A. Yazychestvo Drevney Rusi. M.: Nauka, 1987.
Sboev V.A. Zametki o chuvashakh. Issledovaniya ob inorodtsakh Kazanskoy gubernii. Cheboksary: Chuvashskoe knizhnoe izd-vo, 2004.
Likhachev D.S. Razvitie russkoy literatury X–XVII: epokhi i stili. L.: Nauka, 1973.
Kuz'min A.G. Kreshchenie Rusi: kontseptsii i problemy // Voprosy religii i religiovedeniya. M., 2009. Vyp. 1. Ch. 2.
Korolev S.A. Psevdomorfoza kak tip razvitiya: sluchay Rossii // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2009. ¹ 6.
Klyuchevskiy V.O. Kurs russkoy istorii. Ch. 1 // Klyuchevskiy V.O. Soch. v 8-i tt. T. 1. M.: Gospolitizdat, 1956–1959.
Korolev S.A. «Normannskiy ferment» v kontekste kontseptsii psevdomorfnogo razvitiya Rossii // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2014. ¹ 3.
Zhivov V.M. Razyskaniya v oblasti istorii i predystorii russkoy kul'tury. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoy kul'tury, 2002.
Klimovich L. Islam v tsarskoy Rossii. Kazan': Iman, 2003.
Gurevich A.Ya. Izbrannye trudy. Norvezhskoe obshchestvo. M.: Traditsiya, 2009.
Vesna narodov: etnopoliticheskaya istoriya Volgo-Ural'skogo regiona. Sb. dok-tov / Nauch. red. K. Matsuzato. Sapporo: Slavic Research Center, Hokkaido University, 2002.
Vereshchagin Gr. Chelovecheskie zhertvoprinosheniya votyakov // Izvestiya Arkhangel'skogo obshchestva izucheniya Russkogo Severa. 1911. ¹¹ 10, 12.
Vereshchagin Gr. Ostatki yazychestva u votyakov. Vyatka: Gubernskaya tipografiya, 1895.
Vvedenie khristianstva na Rusi / Otv. red. A.D. Sukhov. M.: Mysl', 1987.
Abdrashitova A.R. Deyatel'nost' Orenburgskogo Magometanskogo Dukhovnogo Sobraniya v 1889–1917 godakh i ego vzaimootnosheniya s gosudarstvennymi organami vlasti. Dis. ... kand. ist. nauk. M., 2001.
Bagin S.A. Ob otpadeniyakh v magometanstvo kreshchenykh inorodtsev Kazanskoy eparkhii i o prichinakh etogo pechal'nogo yavleniya. Kazan': Tsentral'naya tipografiya, 1910.

References (transliteration):
Froyanov I.Ya. Istoricheskie realii v letopisnom skazanii o prizvanii varyagov // Voprosy istorii. 1991. ¹ 6.
Khamayko N. Drevnerusskoe «dvoeverie»: proiskhozhdenie, soderzhanie i adekvatnost' termina // RUTHENICA. 2007. ¹ 6.
Shpengler O. Zakat Evropy. Ocherki morfologii mirovoy istorii. T.2. Vsemirno-istoricheskie perspektivy. M.: Mysl', 1998.
Syzranov A.V. Islam v Astrakhanskom krae. Astrakhan': Izdatel'skiy dom «Astrakhanskiy universitet», 2007.
Tolochko A.P. Knyaz' v Drevney Rusi. Vlast', sobstvennost', ideologiya. Kiev: Naukova dumka, 1992.
Froyanov I.Ya. Zagadka kreshcheniya Rusi. M.: Algoritm, 2007.
Malov E. O tatarskikh mechetyakh v Rossii // Pravoslavnyy sobesednik. 1867. Kn. 12.
Ponyatov A.N. Nekotorye aspekty perekhoda kreshchenykh tatar iz pravoslaviya v islam v Kazanskoy gubernii vo vtoroy polovine XIX – nachale XX vv. // http://www.missiakryashen.ru/history/isss/Ponytov/
Rybakov B.A. Yazychestvo Drevney Rusi. M.: Nauka, 1987.
Sboev V.A. Zametki o chuvashakh. Issledovaniya ob inorodtsakh Kazanskoy gubernii. Cheboksary: Chuvashskoe knizhnoe izd-vo, 2004.
Likhachev D.S. Razvitie russkoy literatury X–XVII: epokhi i stili. L.: Nauka, 1973.
Kuz'min A.G. Kreshchenie Rusi: kontseptsii i problemy // Voprosy religii i religiovedeniya. M., 2009. Vyp. 1. Ch. 2.
Korolev S.A. Psevdomorfoza kak tip razvitiya: sluchay Rossii // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2009. ¹ 6.
Klyuchevskiy V.O. Kurs russkoy istorii. Ch. 1 // Klyuchevskiy V.O. Soch. v 8-i tt. T. 1. M.: Gospolitizdat, 1956–1959.
Korolev S.A. «Normannskiy ferment» v kontekste kontseptsii psevdomorfnogo razvitiya Rossii // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2014. ¹ 3.
Zhivov V.M. Razyskaniya v oblasti istorii i predystorii russkoy kul'tury. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoy kul'tury, 2002.
Klimovich L. Islam v tsarskoy Rossii. Kazan': Iman, 2003.
Gurevich A.Ya. Izbrannye trudy. Norvezhskoe obshchestvo. M.: Traditsiya, 2009.
Vesna narodov: etnopoliticheskaya istoriya Volgo-Ural'skogo regiona. Sb. dok-tov / Nauch. red. K. Matsuzato. Sapporo: Slavic Research Center, Hokkaido University, 2002.
Vereshchagin Gr. Chelovecheskie zhertvoprinosheniya votyakov // Izvestiya Arkhangel'skogo obshchestva izucheniya Russkogo Severa. 1911. ¹¹ 10, 12.
Vereshchagin Gr. Ostatki yazychestva u votyakov. Vyatka: Gubernskaya tipografiya, 1895.
Vvedenie khristianstva na Rusi / Otv. red. A.D. Sukhov. M.: Mysl', 1987.
Abdrashitova A.R. Deyatel'nost' Orenburgskogo Magometanskogo Dukhovnogo Sobraniya v 1889–1917 godakh i ego vzaimootnosheniya s gosudarstvennymi organami vlasti. Dis. ... kand. ist. nauk. M., 2001.
Bagin S.A. Ob otpadeniyakh v magometanstvo kreshchenykh inorodtsev Kazanskoy eparkhii i o prichinakh etogo pechal'nogo yavleniya. Kazan': Tsentral'naya tipografiya, 1910.

Abstract: The author of the article discusses life acquisitions and losses related to the processes and states of violence and nonviolence of human against his mind and of the mind against human. The author outlines the rational borders of the existential experience and discusses the conceptual relations between different ideas, history, eternity, time, past and present. Fatenkov also reveals the special features of the mental or theoretical reenactment of the historical process. He also views and specifies the phenomenon of the end of history and analyzes special features of historiography. According to the author, one’s attitude to the ‘echo of Stalinism’ demonstrates how one feels about the actual past of Russia. Methodological basis of the article is the existential realism and dialects. The author views social historical experience as an essential part of one’s existential experience. According to the author, existential realism offers quite rational views on the end of history and at the same time denies scenarios of the end of history that are too ideology-driven. Only the two scenarios are accepted, the catastrophic and apocalyptic ones. The main feature of reenactment of the past in the situation of the end of history is the tendency towards shortening the distance between the interpreter and the events as well as collapsing of the time gap between particular events.

Keywords: present, past, event, existential, feeling, experience, human, history, historiography, the end of history.

Contact information: Fatenkov Aleksey Nikolaevich, 603000, Russia, Nizhny Novgorod, Universitetsky per. 7.

References:
Trotskiy L. Stalin. – M.: Terra, 1990. – T. 1. – 323 s. T. 2. – 303 s.
Fatenkov A.N. Ekzistentsial'naya ontognoseologiya: kontseptual'nye shtrikhi // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2012.-2.-C. 166-199. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_151.html
Solov'ev V.S. Po povodu poslednikh sobytiy // Solov'ev V.S. Sobr. soch.: V 10 t. – SPb.: Prosveshchenie, 1911–1914. – T. 10. – S. 222–226.
Kundera M. Bessmertie: Roman / per. s chesh. N. Shul'ginoy. – SPb.: Azbuka-klassika, 2004. – 384 s.
Domanska E. Filosofiya istorii posle postmoderna / per. s angl. M.A. Kukartsevoy. – M.: Kanon+, Reabilitatsiya, 2010. – 400 s.
Drie la Roshel' P. Dnevnik, 1939 – 1945 / per. s frants. pod red. S.L. Fokina. – SPb.: Vladimir Dal': Yuventa, 2000. – 602 s. – Rezhim dostupa: http://www.fedy-diary.ru/html/062012/06062012-03a.html.
Begbeder F. Luchshie knigi XX veka. Poslednyaya opis' pered rasprodazhey: Esse / per. s frants. I. Volevich. – M.: FreeFly, 2006. – 191, [1] s.
Arto A. Syurrealizm i revolyutsiya / per. s frants. G. Smirnovoy // Arto A. Teatr i ego Dvoynik. – SPb.: Simpozium, 2000. – S. 243–252.
Ankersmit F.R. Istoriya i tropologiya: vzlet i padenie metafory / per. s angl. M. Kukartseva, E. Kolomoets, V. Kashaeva. – M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2003. – 400 s.
Prokhorov M.M.. Sotsial'nost' myshleniya i ee negatsiya. // Filologiya: nauchnye issledovaniya.-2013.-¹ 4.-C. 324-334. DOI: .10.7256/2305-6177.2013.4.10086.
U.L. Tolsteneva. Sub'ektivnyy smysl lichnostnoy ekzistentsii. // Pedagogika i prosveshchenie.-2013.-¹ 2.-C. 135-141. DOI: .10.7256/2306-434Kh.2013.2.9481..
D.N. Bukharov. Sushchnostnye svoystva i potrebnosti kak istochnik identichnosti cheloveka. // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2013.-¹ 5.-C. 709-717. DOI: .10.7256/1999-2793.2013.05.13.
Dzh.T. Dzhafarova. Ekzistentsiya starosti. // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2012.-¹ 12.-C. 71-77.
P.S. Gurevich. Kladez' istoricheskogo znaniya. Obzor istoricheskikh issledovaniy. // Filologiya: nauchnye issledovaniya.-2012.-¹ 4.-C. 88-96.
E.M. Spirova. Zarastanie transtsendentnoy tropy. // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika.-2012.-¹ 11.-C. 12-20.
R.S. Granin. Ekzistentsial'naya eskhatologiya Nikolaya Berdyaeva. // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2012.-¹ 11.-C. 63-71.
M. F. Rumyantseva. O kul'turnoy sostavlyayushchey istoricheskogo znaniya. // Istoricheskiy zhurnal: nauchnye issledovaniya.-2012.-¹ 3.-C. 7-13.

References (transliteration):
Trotskiy L. Stalin. – M.: Terra, 1990. – T. 1. – 323 s. T. 2. – 303 s.
Fatenkov A.N. Ekzistentsial'naya ontognoseologiya: kontseptual'nye shtrikhi // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2012.-2.-C. 166-199. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_151.html
Solov'ev V.S. Po povodu poslednikh sobytiy // Solov'ev V.S. Sobr. soch.: V 10 t. – SPb.: Prosveshchenie, 1911–1914. – T. 10. – S. 222–226.
Kundera M. Bessmertie: Roman / per. s chesh. N. Shul'ginoy. – SPb.: Azbuka-klassika, 2004. – 384 s.
Domanska E. Filosofiya istorii posle postmoderna / per. s angl. M.A. Kukartsevoy. – M.: Kanon+, Reabilitatsiya, 2010. – 400 s.
Drie la Roshel' P. Dnevnik, 1939 – 1945 / per. s frants. pod red. S.L. Fokina. – SPb.: Vladimir Dal': Yuventa, 2000. – 602 s. – Rezhim dostupa: http://www.fedy-diary.ru/html/062012/06062012-03a.html.
Begbeder F. Luchshie knigi XX veka. Poslednyaya opis' pered rasprodazhey: Esse / per. s frants. I. Volevich. – M.: FreeFly, 2006. – 191, [1] s.
Arto A. Syurrealizm i revolyutsiya / per. s frants. G. Smirnovoy // Arto A. Teatr i ego Dvoynik. – SPb.: Simpozium, 2000. – S. 243–252.
Ankersmit F.R. Istoriya i tropologiya: vzlet i padenie metafory / per. s angl. M. Kukartseva, E. Kolomoets, V. Kashaeva. – M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2003. – 400 s.
Prokhorov M.M.. Sotsial'nost' myshleniya i ee negatsiya. // Filologiya: nauchnye issledovaniya.-2013.-¹ 4.-C. 324-334. DOI: .10.7256/2305-6177.2013.4.10086.
U.L. Tolsteneva. Sub'ektivnyy smysl lichnostnoy ekzistentsii. // Pedagogika i prosveshchenie.-2013.-¹ 2.-C. 135-141. DOI: .10.7256/2306-434Kh.2013.2.9481..
D.N. Bukharov. Sushchnostnye svoystva i potrebnosti kak istochnik identichnosti cheloveka. // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2013.-¹ 5.-C. 709-717. DOI: .10.7256/1999-2793.2013.05.13.
Dzh.T. Dzhafarova. Ekzistentsiya starosti. // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2012.-¹ 12.-C. 71-77.
P.S. Gurevich. Kladez' istoricheskogo znaniya. Obzor istoricheskikh issledovaniy. // Filologiya: nauchnye issledovaniya.-2012.-¹ 4.-C. 88-96.
E.M. Spirova. Zarastanie transtsendentnoy tropy. // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika.-2012.-¹ 11.-C. 12-20.
R.S. Granin. Ekzistentsial'naya eskhatologiya Nikolaya Berdyaeva. // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2012.-¹ 11.-C. 63-71.
M. F. Rumyantseva. O kul'turnoy sostavlyayushchey istoricheskogo znaniya. // Istoricheskiy zhurnal: nauchnye issledovaniya.-2012.-¹ 3.-C. 7-13.

Abstract: The author of the article compares the two different concepts of historical experience offered by Frank Aknersmit and Hans Gadamer. The interest for the phenomenon of historical experience as well as the narrative is one of the most typical features of the modern post-metaphysical philosophy of history. The author of the article pays special attention to the problem of the relation between historical experience and historical narrative. Gadamer’s and Ankersmit’s theories are viewed as the alternative and competing strategies in the sphere of the post-metaphysical philosophy of history. The corner stone in these two theories is the interpretation of the correspondence between historical experience and the language of historical narrative. In his research the author used hermeneutic methods, historical method and historicalcomparative method as well as the problem oriented analysis. Gadamer focused on the positive role of traditions and language as the ontological conditions of historical experience. Gadamer understood historical experience as the experience of appealing to traditions and their interpretation. Ankersmit focused on the negative role of the language. Ankersmit related the authenticity of historical experience to the ‘release from the language jail’. According to the author, the language of history description, on one hand, inevitably distorts the authentic (pre-linguistic) historical experience and, on the other hand, represents the only possible form of its expression.

Keywords: history, historicity, historical experience, language, historical narrative, nostalgia, philosophical hermeneutics, tradition, Gadamer, Ankersmit.

Contact information: Demin Ilya Vyacheslavovich, 443086, Russia, Samara, Moskovskoe shosse 34.

References:
Baksheev E.S. «Dve smerti» v kul'turakh Yaponii i Ryukyu (Okinavy): dvustadiynaya pogrebal'naya obryadnost' v traditsionnykh obshchestvakh kak istoriko-kul'turologicheskaya problema (v kontekste kul'tur Aziatsko-Tikhookeanskogo regiona) // NB: Istoricheskie issledovaniya.-2013.-1.-C. 129-191. DOI: 10.7256/2306-420X.2013.1.470. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/hr/article_470.html
Heidegger M. Sein und Zeit. – Tubingen, 2001. – 445 S.
Prokhorov M.M. Bytie i istoriya: vzaimosvyaz' i opredelenie // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2013.-2.-C. 1-71. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.2.113. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_113.html
Erfahrung und Geschichte: historische Sinnbildung im Pränarrativen / Ed. by Th. Breyer and D. Creutz. – Berlin, N.Y.: De Gruyter, 2010. – 372 r.
Oleynikov A. A. Istoricheskiy opyt – novyy predmet teoreticheskikh issledovaniy // Homo historicus: K 80-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya Yu. L. Bessmertnogo. V 2-kh knigakh. Kn.1. – M.: «Nauka», 2003. – S. 299-311.
Gadamer H.-G. Wahrheit und Methode. Grundzuge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik. – Tuebingen, 1990. – 495 S.
Suvorov G. V. «Povorot k opytu»: metod poznaniya istorii v kontseptsii «intellektual'nogo empirizma» F.R. Ankersmita // Molodoy uchenyy. – 2011. – ¹ 3. T. 1. – S. 224-229.
Rezvykh P. Opyt razryva i sobytie lyubvi (Tezisy ob «istoricheskom opyte» F. Ankersmita i «vechnom proshlom» F. Shellinga) // Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie. 2008. ¹ 92. – S. 196-210.
Oleynikov A. A. Istoricheskiy opyt – novyy predmet teorii. URL: http://kogni.narod.ru/exper.htm (data obrashcheniya 14.03.14).
Demin I. V. Filosofiya istorii kak filosofiya yazyka: osmyslenie istorii v gorizonte germenevticheskoy i analiticheskoy traditsiy // Gumanitarnye issledovaniya v Vostochnoy Sibiri i na Dal'nem Vostoke. 2013. ¹ 6 (26).-S. 158-163.
Domanska E. Filosofiya istorii posle postmodernizma / Per. s angl. M. A. Kukartsevoy. – M.: «Kanon+» ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», 2010. – 400 s.
Kostyakova Yu. B. Istoricheskiy opyt: ot ponimaniya sushchnosti k opredeleniyu termina // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2012. ¹ 12 (26). Ch. II. – C. 98-105.
Gadamer G. G. Istina i metod. Osnovy filosofskoy germenevtiki. – M.: «Progress», 1988. – 704 s.
Demin I. V. Problema istinnosti istoricheskogo znaniya v narrativnoy filosofii istorii // Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Gumanitarnaya seriya. 2008. ¹ 1. – S. 3-10.
Demin I. V. Fenomen nostal'gii v gorizonte postmetafizicheskoy filosofii istorii // Vestnik Samarskoy gumanitarnoy akademii. Seriya «Filosofiya. Filologiya». 2012. ¹ 1 (11). – S. 16-25.
Demin I. V. Filosofiya istorii kak regional'naya ontologiya. – Samara: Samar. gumanit. akad., 2012. – 202 s.
Ankersmit F. R. Narrativnaya logika. Semanticheskiy analiz yazyka istorikov / Per. s angl. O. Gavrishinoy, A. Oleynikova. – M.: Ideya-Press, 2003. – 360 s.
Gavrishina O. V. «Opyt proshlogo»: ponyatie «unikal'noe» v sovremennoy teorii istorii // Kazus: Individual'noe i unikal'noe v istorii. – M., 2002. – C. 328-350.
Ankersmit F. R. Vozvyshennyy istoricheskiy opyt / Per. s angl. A. A. Oleynikova, I. V. Borisovoy, E. E. Lyaminoy i dr. – M.: «Evropa», 2007. – 612 s.
Ankersmit F. R. Istoriya i tropologiya: vzlet i padenie metafory / Per. s angl. M. Kukartseva, E. Kolomoets, V. Kataeva. – M.: «Progress-Traditsiya», 2003. – 496 s.
Tovbin K.M.. Ontologicheskoe izmerenie traditsionnoy dukhovnosti. // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2014.-¹ 2.-C. 239-251. DOI: .10.7256/1999-2793.2014.2.800

References (transliteration):
Baksheev E.S. «Dve smerti» v kul'turakh Yaponii i Ryukyu (Okinavy): dvustadiynaya pogrebal'naya obryadnost' v traditsionnykh obshchestvakh kak istoriko-kul'turologicheskaya problema (v kontekste kul'tur Aziatsko-Tikhookeanskogo regiona) // NB: Istoricheskie issledovaniya.-2013.-1.-C. 129-191. DOI: 10.7256/2306-420X.2013.1.470. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/hr/article_470.html
Heidegger M. Sein und Zeit. – Tubingen, 2001. – 445 S.
Prokhorov M.M. Bytie i istoriya: vzaimosvyaz' i opredelenie // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2013.-2.-C. 1-71. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.2.113. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_113.html
Erfahrung und Geschichte: historische Sinnbildung im Pränarrativen / Ed. by Th. Breyer and D. Creutz. – Berlin, N.Y.: De Gruyter, 2010. – 372 r.
Oleynikov A. A. Istoricheskiy opyt – novyy predmet teoreticheskikh issledovaniy // Homo historicus: K 80-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya Yu. L. Bessmertnogo. V 2-kh knigakh. Kn.1. – M.: «Nauka», 2003. – S. 299-311.
Gadamer H.-G. Wahrheit und Methode. Grundzuge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik. – Tuebingen, 1990. – 495 S.
Suvorov G. V. «Povorot k opytu»: metod poznaniya istorii v kontseptsii «intellektual'nogo empirizma» F.R. Ankersmita // Molodoy uchenyy. – 2011. – ¹ 3. T. 1. – S. 224-229.
Rezvykh P. Opyt razryva i sobytie lyubvi (Tezisy ob «istoricheskom opyte» F. Ankersmita i «vechnom proshlom» F. Shellinga) // Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie. 2008. ¹ 92. – S. 196-210.
Oleynikov A. A. Istoricheskiy opyt – novyy predmet teorii. URL: http://kogni.narod.ru/exper.htm (data obrashcheniya 14.03.14).
Demin I. V. Filosofiya istorii kak filosofiya yazyka: osmyslenie istorii v gorizonte germenevticheskoy i analiticheskoy traditsiy // Gumanitarnye issledovaniya v Vostochnoy Sibiri i na Dal'nem Vostoke. 2013. ¹ 6 (26).-S. 158-163.
Domanska E. Filosofiya istorii posle postmodernizma / Per. s angl. M. A. Kukartsevoy. – M.: «Kanon+» ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», 2010. – 400 s.
Kostyakova Yu. B. Istoricheskiy opyt: ot ponimaniya sushchnosti k opredeleniyu termina // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2012. ¹ 12 (26). Ch. II. – C. 98-105.
Gadamer G. G. Istina i metod. Osnovy filosofskoy germenevtiki. – M.: «Progress», 1988. – 704 s.
Demin I. V. Problema istinnosti istoricheskogo znaniya v narrativnoy filosofii istorii // Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Gumanitarnaya seriya. 2008. ¹ 1. – S. 3-10.
Demin I. V. Fenomen nostal'gii v gorizonte postmetafizicheskoy filosofii istorii // Vestnik Samarskoy gumanitarnoy akademii. Seriya «Filosofiya. Filologiya». 2012. ¹ 1 (11). – S. 16-25.
Demin I. V. Filosofiya istorii kak regional'naya ontologiya. – Samara: Samar. gumanit. akad., 2012. – 202 s.
Ankersmit F. R. Narrativnaya logika. Semanticheskiy analiz yazyka istorikov / Per. s angl. O. Gavrishinoy, A. Oleynikova. – M.: Ideya-Press, 2003. – 360 s.
Gavrishina O. V. «Opyt proshlogo»: ponyatie «unikal'noe» v sovremennoy teorii istorii // Kazus: Individual'noe i unikal'noe v istorii. – M., 2002. – C. 328-350.
Ankersmit F. R. Vozvyshennyy istoricheskiy opyt / Per. s angl. A. A. Oleynikova, I. V. Borisovoy, E. E. Lyaminoy i dr. – M.: «Evropa», 2007. – 612 s.
Ankersmit F. R. Istoriya i tropologiya: vzlet i padenie metafory / Per. s angl. M. Kukartseva, E. Kolomoets, V. Kataeva. – M.: «Progress-Traditsiya», 2003. – 496 s.
Tovbin K.M.. Ontologicheskoe izmerenie traditsionnoy dukhovnosti. // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2014.-¹ 2.-C. 239-251. DOI: .10.7256/1999-2793.2014.2.800

Abstract: Paul Ricœur (1913–2005) is famous for his studies of the phenomenon of human will and human as a subject assigning a specific meaning to the surrounding reality and human as a conscious individual providing material for the phenomenology of spirit. The present article is devoted to the philosopher’s views on objectivity and subjectivity in history that is important not only for philosophy and history but also for individual’s world perception in general. Historical and philosophical conception of Paul Ricœur pays attention at the subjectivism of a historian himself. This conception can be completed with such objective beginnings of historical research as materialistic interpretation of history and anthropological interpretation of history. Ricœur also offered some kind of a triad describing his point of view on the subjective aspects of historical research: the subject of the research, his subjectivity and so called ‘historical traces’. The latter hasn’t lost its importance even today.

Keywords: acceleration, anthropology, history, personal dependence, materialism, neoteny, object, statistics, subject, financial dependence.

Contact information: Klyagin Nikolay Vasilievich , 119991, Russia, Moscow, ul. Volkhonka 14/1, str. 5, komn. 432.

References:
Biologiya cheloveka / Dzh. Kharrison, Dzh. Uayner, Dzh. Tenner, N. Barnikot, V. Reynolds. M.: Mir, 1979. 611 s.
Blok M. Apologiya istorii., ili Remeslo istorika. 2 izd., dop. M.: Nauka, 1986. 256 s.
Geshvind N. Spetsializatsiya chelovecheskogo mozga // Mozg. M.: Mir, 1982. 280 s. S. 219–239.
Klyagin N.V. Proiskhozhdenie tsivilizatsii (sotsial'no-filosofskiy aspekt). M.: IFRAN, 1996. 252 s.
Klyagin N.V. Chelovek v istorii. M.: IFRAN, 1999. 238 s.
Klyagin N.V. Sovremennaya nauchnaya kartina mira: Ucheb. posobie. M.: Universitetskaya kniga, Logos, 2007. 264 s.
Klyagin N.V. Poteryannye pokoleniya // Vysshee obrazovanie dlya XXI veka. V mezhdunarodnaya nauchnaya konferentsiya, Moskva, 13–15 noyabrya 2008 g. Dukhovnoe razvitie cheloveka i soderzhanie vysshego obrazovaniya. M.: MGU, 2008. Ch. 2. S. 33–51.
Leont'ev A.N. Problemy razvitiya psikhiki. 4 izd. M.: MGU, 1981. 584 s.
Platon. Gosudarstvo // Platon. Sobr. soch.: V 4 t. M.: Mysl', 1994. T. 3. 656 s. S. 79–420.
Riker P. Istoriya i istina. SPb.: Aleteyya, 2002. 400 s.
Engel's F. Polozhenie rabochego klassa v Anglii // Marks K., Engel's F. Soch.: 2 izd. M.: Politizdat, 1954. T.1. 698 s. S. 507–509.
Engel's F. Nabroski k kritike politicheskoy ekonomii // Marks K., Engel's F. Soch.: 2 izd. M.: Politizdat, 1954. T.1. 698 s. S. 544–571.
Engel's F. Polozhenie Anglii. Tomas Karleyl'. «Proshloe i nastoyashchee» // Marks K., Engel's F. Soch.: 2 izd. M.: Politizdat, 1954. T.1. 698 s. S. 572–597.
Engel's F. Polozhenie Anglii. Vosemnadtsatyy vek // Marks K., Engel's F. Soch.: 2 izd. M.: Politizdat, 1954. T.1. 698 s. S. 598–617.
Engel's F. Polozhenie Anglii. Angliyskaya konstitutsiya // Marks K., Engel's F. Soch.: 2 izd. M.: Politizdat, 1954. T.1. 698 s. S. 618–642.
Engel's F. Polozhenie rabochego klassa v Anglii. Po sobstvennym nablyudeniyam i dostovernym istochnikam // Marks K., Engel's F. Soch.: 2 izd. M.: Politizdat, 1955. T.2. 651 s. S. 231–517.
Corballis M.C. The Gestural Origins of Language // American Scientist. 1999. Vol. 87, ¹ 2. R. 138–145.
Damasio A. et al. Sign language aphasia during left-hemisphere Amytal injection // Nature. 1986. Vol. 322, ¹ 6077. R. 363–365.
Gorina D.P. et al. The Linguistic Basis of Left Hemisphere Specialization // Science. 1992. Vol. 255, ¹ 5049. R. 1258–1260.
Groves C.P. A theory of human and primate evolution. Oxford: The Clarendon press, 1989. XII, 375 p.
Hewes G.W. Primate Communication and the Gestural Origin of Language // Current Anthropology. 1973. Vol. 14, ¹ 1–2. R. 5–12.
Jaynes J. The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1976. 467 p.
Konopka G. et al. Human-specific transcriptional regulation of CNS development genes by FOXP2 // Nature. 2009. Vol. 462, ¹ 7270. R. 213–217.
Moyà-Solà S. et al. Pierolapithecus catalaunicus, a New Middle Miocene Great Ape from Spain // Science. 2004. Vol. 306, ¹ 5700. R. 1339–1344.
Narlikar J. What if the big bang didn’t happen? // New scientist. 1991. Vol. 129, ¹ 1758. R. 48–51.
Narlikar J. Challenge for the big bang // New scientist. 1993. Vol. 138, ¹ 1878. R. 27–30.
Perlmutter S. et al. Discovery of a supernova explosion at half the age of the Universe // Nature. 1998. Vol. 391, ¹ 6662. R. 51–54.
Prasad G.V.R. et al. A Cretaceous Hoofed Mammal from India // Science. 2007. Vol. 318, ¹ 5852. R. 937

References (transliteration):
Biologiya cheloveka / Dzh. Kharrison, Dzh. Uayner, Dzh. Tenner, N. Barnikot, V. Reynolds. M.: Mir, 1979. 611 s.
Blok M. Apologiya istorii., ili Remeslo istorika. 2 izd., dop. M.: Nauka, 1986. 256 s.
Geshvind N. Spetsializatsiya chelovecheskogo mozga // Mozg. M.: Mir, 1982. 280 s. S. 219–239.
Klyagin N.V. Proiskhozhdenie tsivilizatsii (sotsial'no-filosofskiy aspekt). M.: IFRAN, 1996. 252 s.
Klyagin N.V. Chelovek v istorii. M.: IFRAN, 1999. 238 s.
Klyagin N.V. Sovremennaya nauchnaya kartina mira: Ucheb. posobie. M.: Universitetskaya kniga, Logos, 2007. 264 s.
Klyagin N.V. Poteryannye pokoleniya // Vysshee obrazovanie dlya XXI veka. V mezhdunarodnaya nauchnaya konferentsiya, Moskva, 13–15 noyabrya 2008 g. Dukhovnoe razvitie cheloveka i soderzhanie vysshego obrazovaniya. M.: MGU, 2008. Ch. 2. S. 33–51.
Leont'ev A.N. Problemy razvitiya psikhiki. 4 izd. M.: MGU, 1981. 584 s.
Platon. Gosudarstvo // Platon. Sobr. soch.: V 4 t. M.: Mysl', 1994. T. 3. 656 s. S. 79–420.
Riker P. Istoriya i istina. SPb.: Aleteyya, 2002. 400 s.
Engel's F. Polozhenie rabochego klassa v Anglii // Marks K., Engel's F. Soch.: 2 izd. M.: Politizdat, 1954. T.1. 698 s. S. 507–509.
Engel's F. Nabroski k kritike politicheskoy ekonomii // Marks K., Engel's F. Soch.: 2 izd. M.: Politizdat, 1954. T.1. 698 s. S. 544–571.
Engel's F. Polozhenie Anglii. Tomas Karleyl'. «Proshloe i nastoyashchee» // Marks K., Engel's F. Soch.: 2 izd. M.: Politizdat, 1954. T.1. 698 s. S. 572–597.
Engel's F. Polozhenie Anglii. Vosemnadtsatyy vek // Marks K., Engel's F. Soch.: 2 izd. M.: Politizdat, 1954. T.1. 698 s. S. 598–617.
Engel's F. Polozhenie Anglii. Angliyskaya konstitutsiya // Marks K., Engel's F. Soch.: 2 izd. M.: Politizdat, 1954. T.1. 698 s. S. 618–642.
Engel's F. Polozhenie rabochego klassa v Anglii. Po sobstvennym nablyudeniyam i dostovernym istochnikam // Marks K., Engel's F. Soch.: 2 izd. M.: Politizdat, 1955. T.2. 651 s. S. 231–517.
Corballis M.C. The Gestural Origins of Language // American Scientist. 1999. Vol. 87, ¹ 2. R. 138–145.
Damasio A. et al. Sign language aphasia during left-hemisphere Amytal injection // Nature. 1986. Vol. 322, ¹ 6077. R. 363–365.
Gorina D.P. et al. The Linguistic Basis of Left Hemisphere Specialization // Science. 1992. Vol. 255, ¹ 5049. R. 1258–1260.
Groves C.P. A theory of human and primate evolution. Oxford: The Clarendon press, 1989. XII, 375 p.
Hewes G.W. Primate Communication and the Gestural Origin of Language // Current Anthropology. 1973. Vol. 14, ¹ 1–2. R. 5–12.
Jaynes J. The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1976. 467 p.
Konopka G. et al. Human-specific transcriptional regulation of CNS development genes by FOXP2 // Nature. 2009. Vol. 462, ¹ 7270. R. 213–217.
Moyà-Solà S. et al. Pierolapithecus catalaunicus, a New Middle Miocene Great Ape from Spain // Science. 2004. Vol. 306, ¹ 5700. R. 1339–1344.
Narlikar J. What if the big bang didn’t happen? // New scientist. 1991. Vol. 129, ¹ 1758. R. 48–51.
Narlikar J. Challenge for the big bang // New scientist. 1993. Vol. 138, ¹ 1878. R. 27–30.
Perlmutter S. et al. Discovery of a supernova explosion at half the age of the Universe // Nature. 1998. Vol. 391, ¹ 6662. R. 51–54.
Prasad G.V.R. et al. A Cretaceous Hoofed Mammal from India // Science. 2007. Vol. 318, ¹ 5852. R. 937