Abstract: The research is devoted to the contradictions of national identity. Nikolay Berdyaev offered a number of antinomies through which contradictory nature of national identity can be viewed. The first antinomy is about passion and intolerance specific for the Russian mind. The researcher demonstrates how passion and intolerance are manifested in various spheres of Russian life. The other antinomy sounds like 'Russia is the most ungoverned country in the world', on the one hand, while on the other hand Berdyaev saw Russia as the country with the most rigid government structure. Methodologically this contradiction was determined by the influence of the East and West which, in its turn, contributed to the development of the Russians' 'messianic consciousness'. Dualism of national identity is an interesting topic not only from the point of view of history taking into account the fact that today's Russia is at another 'turning point' just like in Berdyaev's times but also because Berdyaev's idea about the relationship between national and European values will allow to take another look at what is happening in our country today.

Keywords: antinomy, dualism, patience, humility, intolerance, national identity, life, death, mission, values

References:
Berdyaev N. A. Smysl tvorchestva. M.,1989.
Sm.: Berdyaev N. A. Filosofiya svobody. M.,1989. S. 187-188.
Losskiy N. O. Istoriya russkoy filosofii. M., 1991.
Mitropolit Veniamin (Fedchenkov). Vsemirnyy svetil'nik Prepodobnyy Serafim Sarovskiy. M., 2000.
Tolstoy L. N. Sobr. soch. V 20-ti tt. T.16. M., 1964.
Sm.: Zhitie prepodobnogo Serafima Sarovskogo. Beseda prep. Serafima s Motovilovym o tseli khristianskoy zhizni. M., 2002.
Berdyaev N. A. Mirosozertsanie Dostoevskogo. M., 2001.
Berdyaev N. A. Russkaya ideya. M., 1997.
Berdyaev N. A. Sud'ba Rossii. M., 2005.

References (transliteration):
Berdyaev N. A. Smysl tvorchestva. M.,1989.
Sm.: Berdyaev N. A. Filosofiya svobody. M.,1989. S. 187-188.
Losskiy N. O. Istoriya russkoy filosofii. M., 1991.
Mitropolit Veniamin (Fedchenkov). Vsemirnyy svetil'nik Prepodobnyy Serafim Sarovskiy. M., 2000.
Tolstoy L. N. Sobr. soch. V 20-ti tt. T.16. M., 1964.
Sm.: Zhitie prepodobnogo Serafima Sarovskogo. Beseda prep. Serafima s Motovilovym o tseli khristianskoy zhizni. M., 2002.
Berdyaev N. A. Mirosozertsanie Dostoevskogo. M., 2001.
Berdyaev N. A. Russkaya ideya. M., 1997.
Berdyaev N. A. Sud'ba Rossii. M., 2005.

Abstract: The author of the article discusses essential relations, differences and similarities of nation and ethnos as the two scientific categories of the social and philosophical discourse and as social communities that actually exist in the reality and describes their ontological grounds. The author also touches upon peculiarities of the processes of ethno-genesis and nation-genesis including the processes of ethno-cultural fragmentation of nations under the conditions of globalization and multi-culturalization, discusses the role of nations and ethnos as systematically important social group actors in the processes of formation, transformation and differentiation of the modern global society and provides an insight into the theories of socio-genesis, their classification and methodological concepts. The researcher carries out a comparative social and philosophical analysis of the main concepts of socio-genesis in terms of nation and ethnos as the actually existing phenomena of social reality and categories of the social and philosophical discourse studied in the process of their historical development. The author establishes a hypothesis about the qualitative difference between ethnos and nation as long-existing different social communities which genesis is related to different spheres of social existence, in particular, spheres of everyday life for ethnos and political spheres for nation. Results of the comparative analysis of the theories of socio-genesis show that a sustainable dualism of the theoretical approaches to the genesis of social communities (constructivism-primordialism) reflects the non-similarity of nation and ethnos as continuously stable phenomena of different social nature.

Keywords: ethnos, nation, socio-genesis, ethno-genesis, nation-genesis, constructivism, primordialism, instrumentalism, ethnocultural fragmentation, globalization.

Contact information: Safonov Andrey Leonidovich, 115280, Russia, Moscow, st. Avtozavodskaya, h. 16.

References:
Bromley Yu.V., Pershits A.I., Semenov Yu.I. Istoriya pervobytnogo obshchestva. M.:, Nauka, 1983,-431 s.
Pershits A.I.Etnografiya kak istochnik rekonstruktsii istorii pervobytnogo obshchestva. M.,: Nauka, 1979,-168 s.
Gellner E. Natsiya i natsionalizm. M., 1991. S. 35.
Anderson B. Vvedenie // Natsii i natsionalizm / Pod red. B. Andersona. M., 2002. S. 10.
Lur'e S.V. Natsionalizm, etnichnost', kul'tura. Kategorii nauki i istoricheskaya praktika // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 1999. № 4. S. 102.
Safonov A.L. Etnosy i natsii: ontologiya sovmestnogo bytiya: monografiya – M.: MGIU, 2014 – S.80.
A.D. Orlov, A.L. Safonov Postnatsional'noe gosudarstvo: globalizatsiya kak krizis osnovaniy vlasti // Sotsial'no-gumanitarnye znaniya, №5, 2013,S 228.5-243, Moskva,2013
Safonov A.L., Orlov A.D. Globalizatsiya kak divergentsiya: krizis natsii i «renessans» etnosa// Vestnik Buryatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta.Vyp.6 Filosofiya, sotsiologiya, politologiya, kul'turologiya.-Ulan-Ude, 2011.-S.17-23.
Safonov A.L. Natsiya i etnos v kotle globalizatsii – Sotsial'no-gumanitarnye znaniya, №1, 2013,S 273-289, Moskva,2013
A.L. Safonov, A.D. Orlov Natsiya i etnos v edinom mire. Vek globalizatsii, №2, 2013(http://www.intelros.ru/readroom/vek-globalizacii/vek2-2013/21221-naciya-i-etnos-v-edinom-mire.html )
Shchuplenkov O.V. Imperativy natsional'noy idei // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. - 2013. - 2. - C. 122 - 164. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.2.329. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_329.html
Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A. Globalizatsiya v perspektive ustoychivogo budushchego // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2013. - 5. - C. 1 - 63. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.5.794. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_794.html

References (transliteration):
Bromley Yu.V., Pershits A.I., Semenov Yu.I. Istoriya pervobytnogo obshchestva. M.:, Nauka, 1983,-431 s.
Pershits A.I.Etnografiya kak istochnik rekonstruktsii istorii pervobytnogo obshchestva. M.,: Nauka, 1979,-168 s.
Gellner E. Natsiya i natsionalizm. M., 1991. S. 35.
Anderson B. Vvedenie // Natsii i natsionalizm / Pod red. B. Andersona. M., 2002. S. 10.
Lur'e S.V. Natsionalizm, etnichnost', kul'tura. Kategorii nauki i istoricheskaya praktika // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 1999. № 4. S. 102.
Safonov A.L. Etnosy i natsii: ontologiya sovmestnogo bytiya: monografiya – M.: MGIU, 2014 – S.80.
A.D. Orlov, A.L. Safonov Postnatsional'noe gosudarstvo: globalizatsiya kak krizis osnovaniy vlasti // Sotsial'no-gumanitarnye znaniya, №5, 2013,S 228.5-243, Moskva,2013
Safonov A.L., Orlov A.D. Globalizatsiya kak divergentsiya: krizis natsii i «renessans» etnosa// Vestnik Buryatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta.Vyp.6 Filosofiya, sotsiologiya, politologiya, kul'turologiya.-Ulan-Ude, 2011.-S.17-23.
Safonov A.L. Natsiya i etnos v kotle globalizatsii – Sotsial'no-gumanitarnye znaniya, №1, 2013,S 273-289, Moskva,2013
A.L. Safonov, A.D. Orlov Natsiya i etnos v edinom mire. Vek globalizatsii, №2, 2013(http://www.intelros.ru/readroom/vek-globalizacii/vek2-2013/21221-naciya-i-etnos-v-edinom-mire.html )
Shchuplenkov O.V. Imperativy natsional'noy idei // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. - 2013. - 2. - C. 122 - 164. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.2.329. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_329.html
Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A. Globalizatsiya v perspektive ustoychivogo budushchego // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2013. - 5. - C. 1 - 63. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.5.794. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_794.html

Abstract: The author of the article describes one of the most important concepts in German culture, the concept of Heim (Hearth and Home). The author provides a definition of the concept and describes its etymology and traditional use in German culture. The author also describes the main features of this concept from the point of view of the German national mentality including emotional fullness and the feeling of protection, safety and psychological comfort. Moreover, the author compares this German concept with associated terms in other languages and cultures. The author underlines that the concept of Heim (Hearth and Home) satisfies one of the main human needs in privacy and personal (safe) space and protects humans from feeling homelessness as well as experiencing the existential fear (Angst). For a German person, his own tidy and cozy home is the place where the order and safety reign and where he can feel protected from anxieties and threats and chaos of the outside world.

Keywords: cultural research, cultural concept, German culture, national mentality, home (Heim), hearth, existential fear (Angst), existential homelessness, feeling of safety, privacy.

Contact information: Chesnokova Lesya Vladimirovna, 644099, Russia, Omsk, nab. Tukhachevskogo 14.

References:
Vorkachev S. G. Lingvokul'turologiya, yazykovaya lichnost', kontsept: stanovlenie antropotsentricheskoy paradigmy v yazykoznanii // Filologicheskie nauki. 2001. № 1. S. 64-71.
Gachev G. D. Mental'nosti narodov mira. M.: Eksmo, 2008.
Gachev G. D. Natsional'nye obrazy mira. Ellada, Germaniya, Frantsiya: opyt ekzistentsial'noy kul'turologii. M.: Logos, 2008.
Kochetkov V. V. Psikhologiya mezhkul'turnykh razlichiy. M.: Per Se, 2002.
Stepanov Yu. S. Konstanty: Slovar' russkoy kul'tury. M.: Akademicheskiy Proekt, 2004.
Ausgewanderte Wörter»: Eine Auswahl der interessantesten Beiträge zur internationalen Ausschreibung «Ausgewanderte Wörter» (hrsg. von J. Limbach). Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag, 2007.
Bausinger H. Typisch deutsch. Wie deutsch sind die Deutschen. München: Beck, 2009
Duden Deutsches Universalwörterbuch (hrsg. von M. Wermke), 3. Aufl. Mannheim: Dudenverlag, 1996.
Duden Herkunftswörterbuch: Etymologie der deutschen Sprache: Der Duden in zwölf Bänden. Bd. 7. Mannheim: Dudenverlag, 2001.
Ingold F. P. Russische Wege: Geschichte, Kultur, Weltbild. München: Frank, 2007.

References (transliteration):
Vorkachev S. G. Lingvokul'turologiya, yazykovaya lichnost', kontsept: stanovlenie antropotsentricheskoy paradigmy v yazykoznanii // Filologicheskie nauki. 2001. № 1. S. 64-71.
Gachev G. D. Mental'nosti narodov mira. M.: Eksmo, 2008.
Gachev G. D. Natsional'nye obrazy mira. Ellada, Germaniya, Frantsiya: opyt ekzistentsial'noy kul'turologii. M.: Logos, 2008.
Kochetkov V. V. Psikhologiya mezhkul'turnykh razlichiy. M.: Per Se, 2002.
Stepanov Yu. S. Konstanty: Slovar' russkoy kul'tury. M.: Akademicheskiy Proekt, 2004.
Ausgewanderte Wörter»: Eine Auswahl der interessantesten Beiträge zur internationalen Ausschreibung «Ausgewanderte Wörter» (hrsg. von J. Limbach). Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag, 2007.
Bausinger H. Typisch deutsch. Wie deutsch sind die Deutschen. München: Beck, 2009
Duden Deutsches Universalwörterbuch (hrsg. von M. Wermke), 3. Aufl. Mannheim: Dudenverlag, 1996.
Duden Herkunftswörterbuch: Etymologie der deutschen Sprache: Der Duden in zwölf Bänden. Bd. 7. Mannheim: Dudenverlag, 2001.
Ingold F. P. Russische Wege: Geschichte, Kultur, Weltbild. München: Frank, 2007.

Abstract: Specific feature of Russian history is the regular genesis of single-type systemic crises. In order to brake the vicious circle and to realize actual potentials it is necessary, first of all, to understand the deep inside reasons of this process. Sources should be found in both ancient and modern history of Russia that provides enough material for analysis and search for better solutions of eternal problem, self-identification being the central problem here. Many century history of this problem is described as the result of the strongest West influence and painful opposition to it. This inferiority complex is most clearly found out at the level of values. The way to self-affirmation in the global world (also as well as in feudal) is the search for values and goals which would be harmonic for our culture instead of the fashionable purposes and values.

Keywords: self-identification, evolution, value, an inferiority complex, reforms, Westerners, Slavophiles, adaptability, history, elite.

Contact information: Drikker Alexander Samoylovich, 199034, Russia, St. Petersburg, Mendeevskaya linia 5, komn. 146.

References:
RPTs podkhodit k povorotnomu momentu v istorii. " Le mariage de Poutine et de l'église orthodoxe à l'épreuve de Pussy Riot. Slate.fr", 16/08/2012.
Klyagin N.V. Sovremennaya nauchnaya kartina mira. M.: Logos, 2007.
Aksakov I.S. Sochineniya I.S. Aksakova v 7 t., t. 4, M., 1887.
Leont'ev K.N. Vizantizm i slavyanstvo.// Rossiya glazami russkogo, SPb: Nauka, 1991, ss. 171-296, s. 295.
Solov'ev V.S. O dukhovnoy vlasti v Rossii. Sobr. soch. v 15 t., t.3, M.: PAIMS, 1992, ss. 227-242, s. 230.
Drikker A.S. Problema samoopredeleniya: mechty i zhizn'.// Kul'turologicheskie zapiski, vypusk 4: “Rol' intelligentsii v formirovanii kartiny mira”, M.: Gosudarstvennyy institut iskusstvoznaniya, 1998.-s. 115 – 121
Dronov I. E. Sil'nyy, Derzhavnyy…: Zhizn' i tsarstvovanie Imperatora Aleksandra III. — M.: Russkiy izdatel'skiy tsentr, 2012.
Danilevskiy N.Ya. Rossiya i Evropa. M.:2004.
Global'nyy reyting ekonomik po pokazatelyu valovogo natsional'nogo dokhoda na dushu naseleniya. Tsentr gumanitarnykh tekhnologiy. http://gtmarket.ru/ratings/rating-countries-gni/rating-countries-gni-info.
Drikker A.S. Demokratiya i demografiya./ Kul'tura i gigiena. Gumanizm kak potrebnost'. Budapesht: Kairos – Assotsiatsiya za vengero-rossiyskoe sotrudnichestvo, 2012, s. 38-67.
Gurevich P.S. Krizis tsennostnykh orientatsiy.// Vestnik analitiki. 2006, s. 383-91.
Milyukov P.N. Ocherki po istorii russkoy kul'tury, t. 1-3, t. 3. M., 1993-95;
Malyshev M.P. Organizatsiya i planirovanie vseobshchego srednego obrazovaniya. M., 1953.
Leont'ev K. N. Slavyanofil'stvo i gryadushchie sud'by Rossii. (Sost., vstupit. st., ukaz. imen i komment. A. V. Belova M.) M.:: Institut russkoy tsivilizatsii, 2010.
Payps R. Rossiya pri starom rezhime. M.: Nezavisimaya gazeta, 1993
Morton A. L. Istoriya Anglii. M.: Inostrannaya literatura, 1950.
Klyuchevskiy V.O. Istoricheskie portrety. M.: Pravda, 1990.
Trevel'yan Dzh. M. Istoriya Anglii ot Chosera do korolevy Viktorii: M.:Rusich, 2001
Karamzin N. M. Izbrannye sochineniya v dvukh tomakh, t. 1 M., L.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1964.
Klyuchevskiy V.O. Kurs russkoy istorii. M.: 1993.
Iglz R. Istoriya Anglii. M.: AST, Astrel', 2008.
Gurevich P.S. Mekhanika politicheskoy mifologii // Psikhologiya i psikhotekhnika. 2013. № 7 (58). S. 621-626.
Viner N. Kibernetika i obshchestvo. M.: Nauka, 1958.
Feller V. Problemy i perspektivy Rossii v pervom desyatiletii XXI veka.// Feller V. "Mir 2030 i Rossiya 2010". www.vf.narod.ru.
Solzhenitsyn A.I.. Kak nam obustroit' Rossiyu. Spetsial'nyy vypusk, prilozhenie k gazete "Komsomol'skaya pravda", 18 sentyabrya 1990 g.
Zinov'ev A.A. Zapad. Fenomen zapadnizma. M.: !995.
Solov'ev V.S. Russkaya ideya.// Rossiya glazami russkogo, SPb.: Nauka, 1991, ss. 297-339.
Skovoroda G. Sad bozhestvennykh pesney. Khar'kov: Folio, 2009.
V.A. Davydov Protsess rekonstruktsii istoricheskogo proshlogo (osobennosti vliyaniya kul'tury i obshchestva). // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2011. - 3. - C. 14 - 24.

References (transliteration):
RPTs podkhodit k povorotnomu momentu v istorii. " Le mariage de Poutine et de l'église orthodoxe à l'épreuve de Pussy Riot. Slate.fr", 16/08/2012.
Klyagin N.V. Sovremennaya nauchnaya kartina mira. M.: Logos, 2007.
Aksakov I.S. Sochineniya I.S. Aksakova v 7 t., t. 4, M., 1887.
Leont'ev K.N. Vizantizm i slavyanstvo.// Rossiya glazami russkogo, SPb: Nauka, 1991, ss. 171-296, s. 295.
Solov'ev V.S. O dukhovnoy vlasti v Rossii. Sobr. soch. v 15 t., t.3, M.: PAIMS, 1992, ss. 227-242, s. 230.
Drikker A.S. Problema samoopredeleniya: mechty i zhizn'.// Kul'turologicheskie zapiski, vypusk 4: “Rol' intelligentsii v formirovanii kartiny mira”, M.: Gosudarstvennyy institut iskusstvoznaniya, 1998.-s. 115 – 121
Dronov I. E. Sil'nyy, Derzhavnyy…: Zhizn' i tsarstvovanie Imperatora Aleksandra III. — M.: Russkiy izdatel'skiy tsentr, 2012.
Danilevskiy N.Ya. Rossiya i Evropa. M.:2004.
Global'nyy reyting ekonomik po pokazatelyu valovogo natsional'nogo dokhoda na dushu naseleniya. Tsentr gumanitarnykh tekhnologiy. http://gtmarket.ru/ratings/rating-countries-gni/rating-countries-gni-info.
Drikker A.S. Demokratiya i demografiya./ Kul'tura i gigiena. Gumanizm kak potrebnost'. Budapesht: Kairos – Assotsiatsiya za vengero-rossiyskoe sotrudnichestvo, 2012, s. 38-67.
Gurevich P.S. Krizis tsennostnykh orientatsiy.// Vestnik analitiki. 2006, s. 383-91.
Milyukov P.N. Ocherki po istorii russkoy kul'tury, t. 1-3, t. 3. M., 1993-95;
Malyshev M.P. Organizatsiya i planirovanie vseobshchego srednego obrazovaniya. M., 1953.
Leont'ev K. N. Slavyanofil'stvo i gryadushchie sud'by Rossii. (Sost., vstupit. st., ukaz. imen i komment. A. V. Belova M.) M.:: Institut russkoy tsivilizatsii, 2010.
Payps R. Rossiya pri starom rezhime. M.: Nezavisimaya gazeta, 1993
Morton A. L. Istoriya Anglii. M.: Inostrannaya literatura, 1950.
Klyuchevskiy V.O. Istoricheskie portrety. M.: Pravda, 1990.
Trevel'yan Dzh. M. Istoriya Anglii ot Chosera do korolevy Viktorii: M.:Rusich, 2001
Karamzin N. M. Izbrannye sochineniya v dvukh tomakh, t. 1 M., L.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1964.
Klyuchevskiy V.O. Kurs russkoy istorii. M.: 1993.
Iglz R. Istoriya Anglii. M.: AST, Astrel', 2008.
Gurevich P.S. Mekhanika politicheskoy mifologii // Psikhologiya i psikhotekhnika. 2013. № 7 (58). S. 621-626.
Viner N. Kibernetika i obshchestvo. M.: Nauka, 1958.
Feller V. Problemy i perspektivy Rossii v pervom desyatiletii XXI veka.// Feller V. "Mir 2030 i Rossiya 2010". www.vf.narod.ru.
Solzhenitsyn A.I.. Kak nam obustroit' Rossiyu. Spetsial'nyy vypusk, prilozhenie k gazete "Komsomol'skaya pravda", 18 sentyabrya 1990 g.
Zinov'ev A.A. Zapad. Fenomen zapadnizma. M.: !995.
Solov'ev V.S. Russkaya ideya.// Rossiya glazami russkogo, SPb.: Nauka, 1991, ss. 297-339.
Skovoroda G. Sad bozhestvennykh pesney. Khar'kov: Folio, 2009.
V.A. Davydov Protsess rekonstruktsii istoricheskogo proshlogo (osobennosti vliyaniya kul'tury i obshchestva). // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2011. - 3. - C. 14 - 24.

Abstract: The author of the article studies peculiarities of Islam in Dagestan. The author views the balance of the national and confessional aspects from the point of view of history and culture as well as their interaction in modern age of development of the Republic of Dagestan.

Keywords: philosophy, confession, ethnicity, nation, Dagestan, traditions, culture, religious consciousness, Islam, national factor.

Contact information: Gusaeva Karine Gamidovna, 367000, Russia, Republic of Dagestan, Makhachkala, ul. Gadjieva 43 a.

Abstract: The article contains analysis of one of the key German concepts: the concept of coziness (Gemütlichkeit). Much attention is paid to the etymology of this term and history of its use in the German culture. The author provides for the key characteristic features of this concept, namely, the connection with the inner world and soul of a person (Gemüt) and the material conditions of the surrounding atmosphere. The article includes analysis of the social element of this phenomenon and comparison of this term and similar terms in other cultures and languages.

Keywords: cultural studies, concept German culture, Gemütlichkeit (coziness), Gemüt (soul, inner world), home, hearth, Angst (existential fear), individualism, bourgeois culture.

Contact information: Chesnokova, Lesya Vladimirovna, 644043, Russia, Omsk, nab. im. Tukhachevskogo, d. 14.

References:
1. Vysokovskiy A.A. Uyut — ne geroy // Zhilishche v Rossii: vek XX — arkhitektura i sotsial'naya istoriya /
pod red. U. Brumfil'da i B. Rubla. M.: Tri kvadrata, 2002. S. 162-183.
2. Gachev G.D. Natsional'nye obrazy mira. Ellada, Germaniya, Frantsiya: opyt ekzistentsial'noy kul'-
turologii. M.: Logos, 2008.
3. Zaliznyak A.A., Levontina I.Yu., Shmelev A.D. Shiroka strana moya rodnaya // Otechestvennye zapiski.
2002. № 6. S. 176-186.
4. Losev L.V. Stikhi o romane. [Elektronnyy resurs]. — Rezhim dostupa: http://lib.ru/POEZIQ/LOSEW_L/
stihi.txt (data obrashcheniya: 30.10.2012).
5. Stepanov Yu.S. Konstanty: Slovar' russkoy kul'tury. M.: Akademicheskiy Proekt, 2004.
6. Bausinger H. Typisch deutsch. Wie deutsch sind die Deutschen. München: Beck, 2009.
7. Duden. Das Bedeutungswörterbuch (hrsg. von M. Wermke) 3., neu bearb. und erw. Aufl., Bd. 10. Mannheim:
Dudenverlag, 2002.
8. Duden Herkunftswörterbuch: Etymologie der deutschen Sprache: Der Duden in zwölf Bänden. Bd. 7.
Mannheim: Dudenverlag, 2001.
9. Gelfert H.-D. Was ist Deutsch? München: Beck, 2005.
10. Gorski M. Gebrauchsanweisung für Deutschland. München: Piper, 2002.
11. Ingold F. P. Russische Wege. Geschichte — Kultur — Weltbild. München: Fink, 2007.
12. Romeo A. Die Gemütlichkeit // Ihr lieben Deutschen! (hrsg. von A. Troni). München: Ullstein, 2008.
13. Schmidt-Lauber B. Gemütlichkeit: eine kulturwissenschaftliche Annäherung. Frankfurt: Campus, 2003.
14. Wahrig G. Deutsches Wörterbuch (hrsg. von R. Wahrig-Burfeind). Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Lexikon, 2001.

References (transliteration):
1. Vysokovskiy A.A. Uyut — ne geroy // Zhilishche v Rossii: vek XX — arkhitektura i sotsial'naya istoriya /
pod red. U. Brumfil'da i B. Rubla. M.: Tri kvadrata, 2002. S. 162-183.
2. Gachev G.D. Natsional'nye obrazy mira. Ellada, Germaniya, Frantsiya: opyt ekzistentsial'noy kul'-
turologii. M.: Logos, 2008.
3. Zaliznyak A.A., Levontina I.Yu., Shmelev A.D. Shiroka strana moya rodnaya // Otechestvennye zapiski.
2002. № 6. S. 176-186.
4. Losev L.V. Stikhi o romane. [Elektronnyy resurs]. — Rezhim dostupa: http://lib.ru/POEZIQ/LOSEW_L/
stihi.txt (data obrashcheniya: 30.10.2012).
5. Stepanov Yu.S. Konstanty: Slovar' russkoy kul'tury. M.: Akademicheskiy Proekt, 2004.
6. Bausinger H. Typisch deutsch. Wie deutsch sind die Deutschen. München: Beck, 2009.
7. Duden. Das Bedeutungswörterbuch (hrsg. von M. Wermke) 3., neu bearb. und erw. Aufl., Bd. 10. Mannheim:
Dudenverlag, 2002.
8. Duden Herkunftswörterbuch: Etymologie der deutschen Sprache: Der Duden in zwölf Bänden. Bd. 7.
Mannheim: Dudenverlag, 2001.
9. Gelfert H.-D. Was ist Deutsch? München: Beck, 2005.
10. Gorski M. Gebrauchsanweisung für Deutschland. München: Piper, 2002.
11. Ingold F. P. Russische Wege. Geschichte — Kultur — Weltbild. München: Fink, 2007.
12. Romeo A. Die Gemütlichkeit // Ihr lieben Deutschen! (hrsg. von A. Troni). München: Ullstein, 2008.
13. Schmidt-Lauber B. Gemütlichkeit: eine kulturwissenschaftliche Annäherung. Frankfurt: Campus, 2003.
14. Wahrig G. Deutsches Wörterbuch (hrsg. von R. Wahrig-Burfeind). Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Lexikon, 2001.

Abstract: The article is devoted to one of the most important terms in German culture, the concept of longing and yearning (Sehnsucht). Special attention is paid at etymology of the concept and its interpretation in philosophy. The author describes the main features of longing: uncertain pattern, no significant reason, inability to satisfy it and connection with one’s being. The author also underlines the ambivalence of that feeling and views how that concept was reflected in German poetry and Romanticism fine arts.

Keywords: philosophy, culture, cultural concept, longing and yearning (Sehnsucht), romanticism, mentality, Weltschmerz (cosmic sadness), Fernweh (crave for travel), Heinweh (homesickness), Caspar David Friedrich.

Contact information: Chesnokova Lesya Vladimirovna, 644043, Russia, Omsk, nab. im. Tukhachevskogo 14.

References:
1. Barzakh A.E. Toska Annenskogo // Mitin zhurnal. 1996. № 53. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: www.
vavilon.ru/metatext/mj53/barzah2.html (data obrashcheniya: 12.09.2012).
2. Vaynshteyn O.B. Dendi: moda, literatura, stil' zhizni. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2006.
3. Gel'derlin F. Sochineniya. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1969.
4. Degot' E.Yu. Prostranstvennye kody «russkosti» v iskusstve XIX veka // Otechestvennye zapiski.
2002. № 6. S. 187-195.
5. Zhirmunskiy V.P. Nemetskiy romantizm i sovremennaya mistika SPb.: Novoe vremya, 1914.
6. Izard K. Emotsii cheloveka. M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1980.
7. Kamenkovich M.V. Vozvrashchenie nemetskoy melankholii [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://www.
kreschatik.nm.ru/14/20.htm (data obrashcheniya: 14.02.2012).
8. Kuznetsova A.Yu. Khudozhestvennyy tekst kak sposob predstavleniya kul'tury // Vestnik RUDN, ser.
Russkiy i inostrannyy yazyki i metodika ikh prepodavaniya. 2007. № 2. S. 44-47.
9. Zaydenits Sh., Barkou B. «Eti strannye nemtsy» / per. s angl. I. Mittel'man. M.: Egmont Rosiya Ltd,
1999.
10. Lishaev S.A. Estetika Drugogo. SPb.: Izd-vo S.-Peterb. un-ta, 2008.
11. Maslova V.A. Kognitivnaya lingvistika: uchebnoe posobie. Minsk: TetraSistems, 2004.
12. Nabokov V.V. Kommentariy k romanu A.S. Pushkina «Evgeniy Onegin». SPb.: Iskusstvo-SPb, 1998.
13. Reale D., Antiserri D. Zapadnaya filosofiya ot istokov do nashikh dney. V 4 t. T. 4. / per. s ital.
S. Mal'tsevoy. SPb.: TOO TK «Petropolis», 1997.
14. Stepanov Yu.S. Konstanty: Slovar' russkoy kul'tury. M.: Akademicheskiy Proekt, 2004.
15. Fedorov F.P. Romanticheskiy khudozhestvennyy mir: prostranstvo i vremya. Riga: Zinatne, 1988.
16. Khaydegger M. Vremya i bytie: stat'i i vystupleniya / per. s nem. V.V. Bibikhina. M.: Respublika, 1993.
17. Khamitov N.V. Filosofiya cheloveka: ot metafiziki k metaantropologii. Kiev: Nika-Tsentr, 2002.
18. Shlegel' F. Estetika. Filosofiya. Kritika. V 2-kh t. T. 2 / per. s nem. Yu. Popova. M.: Iskusstvo, 1983.
19. Dorn T., Wagner R. Die deutsche Seele. München: Knaus, 2011.
20. Duden Das Bedeutungswörterbuch // Duden in 12 Bünden, Bd. 3. Mannheim: Dudenverlag, 2002.
21. Duden Deutsches Universalwörterbuch. Mannheim: Dudenverlag, 1996.
22. Gelfert H.D. Was ist Deutsch? Wie die Deutschen wurden, was sie sind. München: Beck, 2005.
23. Heidegger Lesebuch (hrsg. von Günter Figel). Frankfurt am Main, 2007.
24. Neidhardt H.J. Deutsche Malerei des 19. Jahrhunderts. Leipzig: Seemann, 2008.
25. Scholl C. Romantische Malerei als neue Sinnbildkunst. München: Deutscher Kunstverlag, 2007.
26. Sommer T. 2006: Sprechende Landschaften // Art. 2006. № 5. S. 21-34.
27. Wahrig Deutsches Wörterbuch (hrsg. von Renate Wahrig-Burfeind). Gütersloh: Bertelsmann, 2001.

References (transliteration):
1. Barzakh A.E. Toska Annenskogo // Mitin zhurnal. 1996. № 53. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: www.
vavilon.ru/metatext/mj53/barzah2.html (data obrashcheniya: 12.09.2012).
2. Vaynshteyn O.B. Dendi: moda, literatura, stil' zhizni. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2006.
3. Gel'derlin F. Sochineniya. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1969.
4. Degot' E.Yu. Prostranstvennye kody «russkosti» v iskusstve XIX veka // Otechestvennye zapiski.
2002. № 6. S. 187-195.
5. Zhirmunskiy V.P. Nemetskiy romantizm i sovremennaya mistika SPb.: Novoe vremya, 1914.
6. Izard K. Emotsii cheloveka. M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1980.
7. Kamenkovich M.V. Vozvrashchenie nemetskoy melankholii [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://www.
kreschatik.nm.ru/14/20.htm (data obrashcheniya: 14.02.2012).
8. Kuznetsova A.Yu. Khudozhestvennyy tekst kak sposob predstavleniya kul'tury // Vestnik RUDN, ser.
Russkiy i inostrannyy yazyki i metodika ikh prepodavaniya. 2007. № 2. S. 44-47.
9. Zaydenits Sh., Barkou B. «Eti strannye nemtsy» / per. s angl. I. Mittel'man. M.: Egmont Rosiya Ltd,
1999.
10. Lishaev S.A. Estetika Drugogo. SPb.: Izd-vo S.-Peterb. un-ta, 2008.
11. Maslova V.A. Kognitivnaya lingvistika: uchebnoe posobie. Minsk: TetraSistems, 2004.
12. Nabokov V.V. Kommentariy k romanu A.S. Pushkina «Evgeniy Onegin». SPb.: Iskusstvo-SPb, 1998.
13. Reale D., Antiserri D. Zapadnaya filosofiya ot istokov do nashikh dney. V 4 t. T. 4. / per. s ital.
S. Mal'tsevoy. SPb.: TOO TK «Petropolis», 1997.
14. Stepanov Yu.S. Konstanty: Slovar' russkoy kul'tury. M.: Akademicheskiy Proekt, 2004.
15. Fedorov F.P. Romanticheskiy khudozhestvennyy mir: prostranstvo i vremya. Riga: Zinatne, 1988.
16. Khaydegger M. Vremya i bytie: stat'i i vystupleniya / per. s nem. V.V. Bibikhina. M.: Respublika, 1993.
17. Khamitov N.V. Filosofiya cheloveka: ot metafiziki k metaantropologii. Kiev: Nika-Tsentr, 2002.
18. Shlegel' F. Estetika. Filosofiya. Kritika. V 2-kh t. T. 2 / per. s nem. Yu. Popova. M.: Iskusstvo, 1983.
19. Dorn T., Wagner R. Die deutsche Seele. München: Knaus, 2011.
20. Duden Das Bedeutungswörterbuch // Duden in 12 Bünden, Bd. 3. Mannheim: Dudenverlag, 2002.
21. Duden Deutsches Universalwörterbuch. Mannheim: Dudenverlag, 1996.
22. Gelfert H.D. Was ist Deutsch? Wie die Deutschen wurden, was sie sind. München: Beck, 2005.
23. Heidegger Lesebuch (hrsg. von Günter Figel). Frankfurt am Main, 2007.
24. Neidhardt H.J. Deutsche Malerei des 19. Jahrhunderts. Leipzig: Seemann, 2008.
25. Scholl C. Romantische Malerei als neue Sinnbildkunst. München: Deutscher Kunstverlag, 2007.
26. Sommer T. 2006: Sprechende Landschaften // Art. 2006. № 5. S. 21-34.
27. Wahrig Deutsches Wörterbuch (hrsg. von Renate Wahrig-Burfeind). Gütersloh: Bertelsmann, 2001.

Abstract: Traditionally, philosophers who study Russian mentality focus on typical contradictions and ‘unsurpassable’ binarity viewed by Lotman as the source of destruction of Russian culture and by Kondakov – as the opposition which made it possible for the culture to exist till late XX. At the same time, the phenomenon considered has stable harmonious properties, too. These properties form the mental code of Russian culture. This code has become the axiological and conceptual costant of Russian culture and created the unique nature and successive development of Russian culture throughout the history. To study the code, the author suggests to use deconstruction as a research method, because it allows to reconstruct its hidden mechanism and to change its configuration according to a new historical environment. This approach, combined with the methods of structuralism and psychoanalysis, has shown that binarity was typical for the structure of the mental code only at early stage of its development. Now the mental code consists of the three elements which allows Russian culture retain its entirety as well as to keep a decent position in the multicultural in conditions of globalization.

Keywords: philosophy, Russian culture, mental code, structure, function, the must mode, identity, reconstruction, destruction, deconstruction.

Contact information: Amelchenko, S. N., 455038, Russia, Magnitogorsk, pr. Lenina 114.

References:
1. Berdyaev N.A. Novoe srednevekov'e // Berdyaev N.A. Filosofiya tvorchestva, kul'tury i iskusstva:
v 2 t. M., 1994. T. 1.
2. Berdyaev N.A. Russkaya ideya. M.-Khar'kov, 1999.
3. Berdyaev N.A. Filosofiya svobody. Istoki i smysl russkogo kommunizma. M., 1997.
4. Biryukov N.I. Sobornost' kak religioznyy i politicheskiy ideal // Filosofskie nauki. 2005. № 6.
5. Bulgakov S.N. Sofiynost' khozyaystva // Russkiy kosmizm: Antologiya filosofskoy mysli. M., 1993.
6. Gurevich P.S. Iz chego skladyvaetsya dukhovnaya kul'tura obshchestva? // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2012. № 5.
7. Gurevich P.S., Shul'man O. I. Mental'nost', mentalitet // Kul'turologiya. Entsiklopediya: v 2 t.
M., 2007. T. 1.
8. Dostoevskiy F.M. Ob'yasnitel'noe slovo po povodu pechataemoy nizhe rechi o Pushkine // Poln. sobr.
soch. V 30-ti t. M., 1984. T. 26.
9. Dukhovnost', khudozhestvennoe tvorchestvo, nravstvennost' (materialy kruglogo stola) // Voprosy
filosofii. 1996. № 2.
10. Edinstvo mira i mnogoobrazie kul'tur (materialy kruglogo stola) // Voprosy filosofii. 2011. № 9.
11. Kondakov I.V. Kul'tura Rossii: kratkiy ocherk istorii i teorii. M., 2007.
12. Levi-Stros K. Strukturnaya antropologiya. M., 1985.
13. Lotman Yu.M. Istoriya i tipologiya russkoy kul'tury. SPb., 2002.
14. Lotman Yu.M. Semiosfera. SPb., 2000.
15. Rossiyskaya mental'nost': Kruglyy stol // Voprosy filosofii. 1994. № 1.
16. Skenlan D.P. Nuzhna li Rossii russkaya filosofiya? // Voprosy filosofii. 1994. № 1.
17. Solov'ev V.S. Opravdanie dobra. // Solov'ev V.S. Soch.: v 2 t. M., 1988. T. 1.
18. Shulyndin B.P. Rossiyskiy mentalitet v stsenariyakh peremen // Sotsis. 1999. № 12.
19. Yung K. K voprosu o podsoznanii // Chelovek i ego simvoly. M., 1997.

References (transliteration):
1. Berdyaev N.A. Novoe srednevekov'e // Berdyaev N.A. Filosofiya tvorchestva, kul'tury i iskusstva:
v 2 t. M., 1994. T. 1.
2. Berdyaev N.A. Russkaya ideya. M.-Khar'kov, 1999.
3. Berdyaev N.A. Filosofiya svobody. Istoki i smysl russkogo kommunizma. M., 1997.
4. Biryukov N.I. Sobornost' kak religioznyy i politicheskiy ideal // Filosofskie nauki. 2005. № 6.
5. Bulgakov S.N. Sofiynost' khozyaystva // Russkiy kosmizm: Antologiya filosofskoy mysli. M., 1993.
6. Gurevich P.S. Iz chego skladyvaetsya dukhovnaya kul'tura obshchestva? // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2012. № 5.
7. Gurevich P.S., Shul'man O. I. Mental'nost', mentalitet // Kul'turologiya. Entsiklopediya: v 2 t.
M., 2007. T. 1.
8. Dostoevskiy F.M. Ob'yasnitel'noe slovo po povodu pechataemoy nizhe rechi o Pushkine // Poln. sobr.
soch. V 30-ti t. M., 1984. T. 26.
9. Dukhovnost', khudozhestvennoe tvorchestvo, nravstvennost' (materialy kruglogo stola) // Voprosy
filosofii. 1996. № 2.
10. Edinstvo mira i mnogoobrazie kul'tur (materialy kruglogo stola) // Voprosy filosofii. 2011. № 9.
11. Kondakov I.V. Kul'tura Rossii: kratkiy ocherk istorii i teorii. M., 2007.
12. Levi-Stros K. Strukturnaya antropologiya. M., 1985.
13. Lotman Yu.M. Istoriya i tipologiya russkoy kul'tury. SPb., 2002.
14. Lotman Yu.M. Semiosfera. SPb., 2000.
15. Rossiyskaya mental'nost': Kruglyy stol // Voprosy filosofii. 1994. № 1.
16. Skenlan D.P. Nuzhna li Rossii russkaya filosofiya? // Voprosy filosofii. 1994. № 1.
17. Solov'ev V.S. Opravdanie dobra. // Solov'ev V.S. Soch.: v 2 t. M., 1988. T. 1.
18. Shulyndin B.P. Rossiyskiy mentalitet v stsenariyakh peremen // Sotsis. 1999. № 12.
19. Yung K. K voprosu o podsoznanii // Chelovek i ego simvoly. M., 1997.

Abstract: The article is devoted to social and cultural background of the phenomenon of Russian youth movement outside their native country. The authors of the article describe certain measure which, at least for a while, allowed to stop de-nationalization of growing generation.

Keywords: philosophy, history, emigration, youth, succession, acculturation, mentality, nation, identity, cultural studies.

References:
1. F. R-5771: Predstavitel'stvo Ob'edineniya Russkikh Zemskikh i Gorodskikh Deyateley v Belgrade
(ZEMGOR). 1920-1941. Op. 2. D. 19.
2. Berezovaya L.G. Kul'tura russkoy emigratsii (1920-30-e gg.) // Novyy istoricheskiy Vestnik. M.,
2005. № 3. S. 122.
3. Bitsilli P.M. «Tragediya russkoy kul'tury» (1933) // Russkaya literatura. M., 1990. Kn. 2. S. 147.
4. Gessen S.I. Osnovy pedagogiki. Vvedenie v prikladnuyu filosofiyu. Knigoizdatel'stvo «Slovo».
Berlin, 1923. (sostavlenie izd-vo «Shkola-Press», 1995. 448 s.)
5. Dekhterev A. Shkol'nyy god. Dnevnik vospitatelya // Russkaya shkola za rubezhom. Praga, 1927-1928.
Kn. 28. S. 38.
6. Zaytsev B.K. Slovo o Rodine // Russkaya ideya. M., 1992. S. 378.
7. Zen'kovskiy V.V. Problema shkol'nogo vospitaniya v emigratsii // Russkaya shkola za rubezhom. Praga,
1929. Kn. 32. S. 174-176.
8. Il'in I.A. Sobranie sochineniy: V 10-ti tt. / I.A. Il'in; sost. i komment. Yu.T. Lisitsy. M.: Rus.
kn., 1993. T. 2. Kn. 1: Nashi zadachi: Stat'i 1948-1954 gg. 496 s.
9. Istoriya rossiyskoy intelligentsii: Materialy i tezisy nauchnoy konferentsii. M., 1995. S. 21, 22.
10. Kulikov V.V. Pedagogicheskaya antropologiya: istoki, napravleniya, problemy. Sverdlovsk, 1988. 192 s.
11. Losskiy N.O. Kharakter russkogo naroda. Kniga vtoraya. M., 1990. 90 s.
12. Makletsov A. K voprosu o sud'bakh podrastayushchego pokoleniya // RShRZ. Praga, 1923. Kn. 1. S. 60-68.
13. Meysner D.I. Mirazhi i deystvitel'nost': Zapiski emigranta / Poslesl. izd-va. M.: Izd-vo APN,
1966. 298 s.
14. O Rossii i russkoy filosofskoy kul'ture filosofy russkogo posleoktyabr'skogo zarubezh'ya. M.:
Nauka, 1990. 528 s.
15. Pis'mo starogo pedagoga // Russkaya shkola za rubezhom. Praga, 1927-1928. Kn. 28. S. 522.
16. Postnikov S.P. I, II — Politika, ideologiya, byt i uchenye trudy russkoy emigratsii (1918–1945).
Bibliografiya: Iz kataloga biblioteki Russkogo Zagranichnogo Istoricheskogo Arkhiva v Prage.
T. I. Knigi i broshyury Russkoy emigratsii 1918-1945 gg. M., 1993. S. 5.
17. Raev M. Rossiya za rubezhom: Istoriya kul'tury russkoy emigratsii. 1919-1939. M., 1994. 296 s.
18. Rokov G. O natsional'no-patrioticheskom vospitanii // Vestnik vospitaniya. M., 1908. № 4. S. 76.
19. Russkoe zarubezh'e: Zolotaya kniga emigratsii. Pervaya tret' KhKh veka: Entsiklopedicheskiy biogra-
ficheskiy slovar' / Po obshch. red. V.V. Shelokhaeva. M.: ROSSPEN, 1996. 742 s.
20. Skobtsova E. Sotsial'nye sdvigi v emigratsii // Novyy grad. Parizh, 1932. № 2. S. 73.
21. Stepun F.A. Zadachi emigratsii // Novyy grad. Parizh, 1932. № 2. S. 16.
22. Tatarinova El. Russkaya molodezh' v Zarubezh'e // Vozrozhdenie. Parizh, 1932. № 233. S. 114.
23. Fedotov G.P. Zachem my zdes'? // Sovremennye zapiski. Kn. LVIII. Parizh, 1935. № 58. S. 434-450.
24. Fedotov G.P. Zashchita Rossii. Stat'i 1936-1940-kh gg. // Novaya Rossiya. Parizh, 1988. S. 43.
25. Freynkman-Khrustaleva N.S., Novikov A.I. Emigratsiya i emigranty: Istoriya i psikhologiya / Nauch.
red. G.A. Tishkin. SPb, 1995. 153 s.
26. Chirikov E.N. O novoy russkoy intelligentsii // Vozrozhdenie. Parizh, 1925. № 10. S. 2.
27. Shchuplenkov O.V. Dialektika vospitaniya v emigratsii pervoy volny // Perspektivy nauki. № 5(07).
Tambov, 2010. S. 84-87.
28. Shchuplenkov O.V. Patrioticheskoe vospitanie v voennom obrazovanii Rossiyskogo Zarubezh'ya v kon-
tekste sovremennogo istoricheskogo obrazovaniya shkol'nikov // Prepodavanie istorii v shkole.
M., 2007. № 10. S. 68-71.
29. Shchuplenkov O.V. Russkiy natsionalizm v vozzreniyakh otechestvennykh mysliteley // Perspektivy
nauki. № 4(06). Tambov, 2010. S. 42-45.
30. Yanovskiy V. Polya Eliseyskie: Kniga pamyati / Predisl. S. Dovlatova. SPb: Pushkinskiy fond,
1993. 276 s.

References (transliteration):
1. F. R-5771: Predstavitel'stvo Ob'edineniya Russkikh Zemskikh i Gorodskikh Deyateley v Belgrade
(ZEMGOR). 1920-1941. Op. 2. D. 19.
2. Berezovaya L.G. Kul'tura russkoy emigratsii (1920-30-e gg.) // Novyy istoricheskiy Vestnik. M.,
2005. № 3. S. 122.
3. Bitsilli P.M. «Tragediya russkoy kul'tury» (1933) // Russkaya literatura. M., 1990. Kn. 2. S. 147.
4. Gessen S.I. Osnovy pedagogiki. Vvedenie v prikladnuyu filosofiyu. Knigoizdatel'stvo «Slovo».
Berlin, 1923. (sostavlenie izd-vo «Shkola-Press», 1995. 448 s.)
5. Dekhterev A. Shkol'nyy god. Dnevnik vospitatelya // Russkaya shkola za rubezhom. Praga, 1927-1928.
Kn. 28. S. 38.
6. Zaytsev B.K. Slovo o Rodine // Russkaya ideya. M., 1992. S. 378.
7. Zen'kovskiy V.V. Problema shkol'nogo vospitaniya v emigratsii // Russkaya shkola za rubezhom. Praga,
1929. Kn. 32. S. 174-176.
8. Il'in I.A. Sobranie sochineniy: V 10-ti tt. / I.A. Il'in; sost. i komment. Yu.T. Lisitsy. M.: Rus.
kn., 1993. T. 2. Kn. 1: Nashi zadachi: Stat'i 1948-1954 gg. 496 s.
9. Istoriya rossiyskoy intelligentsii: Materialy i tezisy nauchnoy konferentsii. M., 1995. S. 21, 22.
10. Kulikov V.V. Pedagogicheskaya antropologiya: istoki, napravleniya, problemy. Sverdlovsk, 1988. 192 s.
11. Losskiy N.O. Kharakter russkogo naroda. Kniga vtoraya. M., 1990. 90 s.
12. Makletsov A. K voprosu o sud'bakh podrastayushchego pokoleniya // RShRZ. Praga, 1923. Kn. 1. S. 60-68.
13. Meysner D.I. Mirazhi i deystvitel'nost': Zapiski emigranta / Poslesl. izd-va. M.: Izd-vo APN,
1966. 298 s.
14. O Rossii i russkoy filosofskoy kul'ture filosofy russkogo posleoktyabr'skogo zarubezh'ya. M.:
Nauka, 1990. 528 s.
15. Pis'mo starogo pedagoga // Russkaya shkola za rubezhom. Praga, 1927-1928. Kn. 28. S. 522.
16. Postnikov S.P. I, II — Politika, ideologiya, byt i uchenye trudy russkoy emigratsii (1918–1945).
Bibliografiya: Iz kataloga biblioteki Russkogo Zagranichnogo Istoricheskogo Arkhiva v Prage.
T. I. Knigi i broshyury Russkoy emigratsii 1918-1945 gg. M., 1993. S. 5.
17. Raev M. Rossiya za rubezhom: Istoriya kul'tury russkoy emigratsii. 1919-1939. M., 1994. 296 s.
18. Rokov G. O natsional'no-patrioticheskom vospitanii // Vestnik vospitaniya. M., 1908. № 4. S. 76.
19. Russkoe zarubezh'e: Zolotaya kniga emigratsii. Pervaya tret' KhKh veka: Entsiklopedicheskiy biogra-
ficheskiy slovar' / Po obshch. red. V.V. Shelokhaeva. M.: ROSSPEN, 1996. 742 s.
20. Skobtsova E. Sotsial'nye sdvigi v emigratsii // Novyy grad. Parizh, 1932. № 2. S. 73.
21. Stepun F.A. Zadachi emigratsii // Novyy grad. Parizh, 1932. № 2. S. 16.
22. Tatarinova El. Russkaya molodezh' v Zarubezh'e // Vozrozhdenie. Parizh, 1932. № 233. S. 114.
23. Fedotov G.P. Zachem my zdes'? // Sovremennye zapiski. Kn. LVIII. Parizh, 1935. № 58. S. 434-450.
24. Fedotov G.P. Zashchita Rossii. Stat'i 1936-1940-kh gg. // Novaya Rossiya. Parizh, 1988. S. 43.
25. Freynkman-Khrustaleva N.S., Novikov A.I. Emigratsiya i emigranty: Istoriya i psikhologiya / Nauch.
red. G.A. Tishkin. SPb, 1995. 153 s.
26. Chirikov E.N. O novoy russkoy intelligentsii // Vozrozhdenie. Parizh, 1925. № 10. S. 2.
27. Shchuplenkov O.V. Dialektika vospitaniya v emigratsii pervoy volny // Perspektivy nauki. № 5(07).
Tambov, 2010. S. 84-87.
28. Shchuplenkov O.V. Patrioticheskoe vospitanie v voennom obrazovanii Rossiyskogo Zarubezh'ya v kon-
tekste sovremennogo istoricheskogo obrazovaniya shkol'nikov // Prepodavanie istorii v shkole.
M., 2007. № 10. S. 68-71.
29. Shchuplenkov O.V. Russkiy natsionalizm v vozzreniyakh otechestvennykh mysliteley // Perspektivy
nauki. № 4(06). Tambov, 2010. S. 42-45.
30. Yanovskiy V. Polya Eliseyskie: Kniga pamyati / Predisl. S. Dovlatova. SPb: Pushkinskiy fond,
1993. 276 s.

Abstract: The article analyzes the genesis of philosophical conceptions of modernization from the point of view of economic activity. The authors of the article describe the relation between modernization and postindustrialization models of socio-cultural development. The authors show the peculiar nature of national economic management culture and raises a question about ethno-confessional economic management.

Keywords: philosophy, ethno-confessional relations, ethno-confessional factor, modernization, post-modernization, post-industrialization, economic management, non-linear, local modernization.

References:
1. Bell D. Gryadushchee postindustrial'noe obshchestvo: opyt sotsial'nogo prognozirovaniya / Daniel'
Bell; per. s angl. M.: Academia, 1993. 783 s.
2. Bell D., Inozemtsev V. Epokha razobshchennosti / D. Bell, V. Inozemtsev. M.: Tsentr issledovaniy po-
stindustrial'nogo obshchestva, 2007.
3. Brodel' F. Dinamika kapitalizma: lektsii / F. Brodel'; per. s fr. V. Kolesnikova. Smolensk: Po-
ligramma, 1993. 124 s.
4. Veselov Yu.V. Ekonomicheskaya sotsiologiya postmoderna / Yu.V. Veselov // Zhurnal sotsiologii i so-
tsial'noy antropologii. 1998. Tom I. Vyp. 1. S. 56-68.
5. Inozemtsev V.L. Raskolotaya tsivilizatsiya. Nalichestvuyushie predposylki i vozmozhnye posledstviya
postekonomicheskoy revolyutsii / V.L. Inozemtsev. M.: Academia-nauka, 1999. 724 s.
6. Magun V.S. Rossiyskie trudovye tsennosti: ideologiya i massovoe soznanie / V.S. Magun // Mir
Rossii. 1998. № 4. S. 113-144.
7. Panarin A.S. Vybor Rossii: mezhdu atlantizmom i evraziystvom / A.S. Panarin // Tsivilizatsii
i kul'tury: nauchnyy al'manakh. Vyp. 2. M., 1995.
8. Razin A.S., Belov A.V. Metodologicheskie osnovaniya klassicheskoy kontseptsii otvetstvennosti v
sovremennom sotsial'no-filosofskom znanii / A.S. Razin, A.V. Belov // Filosofiya i kul'tura.
2011. № 12. S. 65-70.
9. Razin A.S. Etnokonfessional'nyy potentsial ekonomicheskogo rosta v mire postmoderna /
A.S. Razin // Filosofiya, vera, dukhovnost': istoki, pozitsiya i tendentsii razvitiya: monografiya /
[K.A. Alpatova, S.A. Barsukova, A.L. Bib i dr.]; pod obshchey red. prof. O.I. Kirikova. Voronezh: VGPU,
2011. S. 148-164.
10. Raskov D.E. Staroobryadcheskaya traditsiya i Postmodern / D.E. Raskov // Filosofiya khozyaystva. 2004.
№ 2. S. 111-124.
11. Raskov D.E. Staroobryadchestvo i russkiy kapitalizm: dinamika i protivorechiya / D.E. Raskov //
Ekonomicheskaya istoriya Rossii: problemy, poiski, resheniya: ezhegodnik / pod red. M.M. Zagorul'-
ko. Vyp. 4. M.-Volgograd, 2002.
12. Superfin L. Religiya v industrial'nom i postindustrial'nom mire (tendentsii zapadnogo opyta) /
L. Superfin // Voprosy ekonomiki. 1993. № 8. S. 32-44.
13. Tikhonova N.E. Sotsiokul'turnaya modernizatsiya v Rossii (Opyt empiricheskogo analiza) /
N.E. Tikhonova // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2008. № 2. S. 5-23; № 3. S. 5-20.
14. Toffler E. Futuroshok / E. Toffler. SPb: Lan', 1998. 186 s.
15. Fedotova V.G. Neklassicheskie modernizatsii i al'ternativy modernizatsionnoy teorii /
V.G. Fedotova // Voprosy filosofii. 2002. № 12. S. 3-22.
16. Fedotova V.G., Kolpakov, V.A., Fedotova, N.I. Global'nyy kapitalizm: Tri velikie transforma-
tsii, Sotsial'no-filosofskiy analiz vzaimootnosheniya ekonomiki i obshchestva / V.G. Fedotova,
V.A. Kolpakov, N.I. Fedotov. M.: Progress-Traditsiya. 2008. S. 184-187.
17. Khantington S. Kto my? Vyzovy amerikanskoy natsional'noy identichnosti / S. Khantington; per.
s angl. A. Bashkirova. M.: AST: AST MOSKVA, 2008. 635 s.
18. Khantington S. Stolknovenie tsivilizatsiy? / S. Khantington // Politicheskie issledovaniya. 1994.
№ 1. S. 3-25.
19. Eyzenshtadt Sh. Revolyutsiya i preobrazovanie obshchestv: sravnitel'noe izuchenie tsivilizatsii /
Sh. Eyzenshtadt; per. s angl. M.: Aspekt Press, 1999. 415 s.
20. Yakovets Yu.V. Formirovanie postindustrial'noy paradigmy: istoki i perspektivy / Yu.V. Yakovets //
Voprosy filosofii. 1997. № 1. S. 58-64.
21. Barro R.J., McCleary R.M. Religion and Economic Growth. May 2003. NBER Working Paper 9682 [Elek-
tronnyy resurs] // http://www.nber.org/papers/w9682
22. Barros P.P., Garoupa N. An Economic Theory of Church Strictness // Economic Journal. 2002. Vol. 112
(July). P. 558-575.
23. Kuzio T. Transition in post-communist states: triple or quadruple? // Politics. Oxford, 2001. Vol. 21 (3).
P. 168-177.
24. Schwinn T. Von der historischen Entstehung zur aktuellen Ausbreitung der Moderne Max Webers Soziologie
im 21. Jahrhundert // Berl. J. Soziol. V., 2004. H. 4. S. 527-544.

References (transliteration):
1. Bell D. Gryadushchee postindustrial'noe obshchestvo: opyt sotsial'nogo prognozirovaniya / Daniel'
Bell; per. s angl. M.: Academia, 1993. 783 s.
2. Bell D., Inozemtsev V. Epokha razobshchennosti / D. Bell, V. Inozemtsev. M.: Tsentr issledovaniy po-
stindustrial'nogo obshchestva, 2007.
3. Brodel' F. Dinamika kapitalizma: lektsii / F. Brodel'; per. s fr. V. Kolesnikova. Smolensk: Po-
ligramma, 1993. 124 s.
4. Veselov Yu.V. Ekonomicheskaya sotsiologiya postmoderna / Yu.V. Veselov // Zhurnal sotsiologii i so-
tsial'noy antropologii. 1998. Tom I. Vyp. 1. S. 56-68.
5. Inozemtsev V.L. Raskolotaya tsivilizatsiya. Nalichestvuyushie predposylki i vozmozhnye posledstviya
postekonomicheskoy revolyutsii / V.L. Inozemtsev. M.: Academia-nauka, 1999. 724 s.
6. Magun V.S. Rossiyskie trudovye tsennosti: ideologiya i massovoe soznanie / V.S. Magun // Mir
Rossii. 1998. № 4. S. 113-144.
7. Panarin A.S. Vybor Rossii: mezhdu atlantizmom i evraziystvom / A.S. Panarin // Tsivilizatsii
i kul'tury: nauchnyy al'manakh. Vyp. 2. M., 1995.
8. Razin A.S., Belov A.V. Metodologicheskie osnovaniya klassicheskoy kontseptsii otvetstvennosti v
sovremennom sotsial'no-filosofskom znanii / A.S. Razin, A.V. Belov // Filosofiya i kul'tura.
2011. № 12. S. 65-70.
9. Razin A.S. Etnokonfessional'nyy potentsial ekonomicheskogo rosta v mire postmoderna /
A.S. Razin // Filosofiya, vera, dukhovnost': istoki, pozitsiya i tendentsii razvitiya: monografiya /
[K.A. Alpatova, S.A. Barsukova, A.L. Bib i dr.]; pod obshchey red. prof. O.I. Kirikova. Voronezh: VGPU,
2011. S. 148-164.
10. Raskov D.E. Staroobryadcheskaya traditsiya i Postmodern / D.E. Raskov // Filosofiya khozyaystva. 2004.
№ 2. S. 111-124.
11. Raskov D.E. Staroobryadchestvo i russkiy kapitalizm: dinamika i protivorechiya / D.E. Raskov //
Ekonomicheskaya istoriya Rossii: problemy, poiski, resheniya: ezhegodnik / pod red. M.M. Zagorul'-
ko. Vyp. 4. M.-Volgograd, 2002.
12. Superfin L. Religiya v industrial'nom i postindustrial'nom mire (tendentsii zapadnogo opyta) /
L. Superfin // Voprosy ekonomiki. 1993. № 8. S. 32-44.
13. Tikhonova N.E. Sotsiokul'turnaya modernizatsiya v Rossii (Opyt empiricheskogo analiza) /
N.E. Tikhonova // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2008. № 2. S. 5-23; № 3. S. 5-20.
14. Toffler E. Futuroshok / E. Toffler. SPb: Lan', 1998. 186 s.
15. Fedotova V.G. Neklassicheskie modernizatsii i al'ternativy modernizatsionnoy teorii /
V.G. Fedotova // Voprosy filosofii. 2002. № 12. S. 3-22.
16. Fedotova V.G., Kolpakov, V.A., Fedotova, N.I. Global'nyy kapitalizm: Tri velikie transforma-
tsii, Sotsial'no-filosofskiy analiz vzaimootnosheniya ekonomiki i obshchestva / V.G. Fedotova,
V.A. Kolpakov, N.I. Fedotov. M.: Progress-Traditsiya. 2008. S. 184-187.
17. Khantington S. Kto my? Vyzovy amerikanskoy natsional'noy identichnosti / S. Khantington; per.
s angl. A. Bashkirova. M.: AST: AST MOSKVA, 2008. 635 s.
18. Khantington S. Stolknovenie tsivilizatsiy? / S. Khantington // Politicheskie issledovaniya. 1994.
№ 1. S. 3-25.
19. Eyzenshtadt Sh. Revolyutsiya i preobrazovanie obshchestv: sravnitel'noe izuchenie tsivilizatsii /
Sh. Eyzenshtadt; per. s angl. M.: Aspekt Press, 1999. 415 s.
20. Yakovets Yu.V. Formirovanie postindustrial'noy paradigmy: istoki i perspektivy / Yu.V. Yakovets //
Voprosy filosofii. 1997. № 1. S. 58-64.
21. Barro R.J., McCleary R.M. Religion and Economic Growth. May 2003. NBER Working Paper 9682 [Elek-
tronnyy resurs] // http://www.nber.org/papers/w9682
22. Barros P.P., Garoupa N. An Economic Theory of Church Strictness // Economic Journal. 2002. Vol. 112
(July). P. 558-575.
23. Kuzio T. Transition in post-communist states: triple or quadruple? // Politics. Oxford, 2001. Vol. 21 (3).
P. 168-177.
24. Schwinn T. Von der historischen Entstehung zur aktuellen Ausbreitung der Moderne Max Webers Soziologie
im 21. Jahrhundert // Berl. J. Soziol. V., 2004. H. 4. S. 527-544.

Abstract: The article is devoted to the analysis of Russian people’s everyday life during the last third of the 17th century as a part of the historical process of changing human consciousness. The author of the article also discusses how a new form of social and everyday life was formed when Russia adopted elements of Western European culture. The article descries the bright moments of everyday life and holidays of the Russian people as well as interest of foreigners who arrived at and lived in Russia during the last third of the 17th century. The article is based on historical, cultural and culturological approaches.

Keywords: cultural studies, Russia, society, holiday, everyday culture, foreigners, urban mentality, feudalism, clothes, power.

References:
1. Bayburova R. Russkie v dopetrovskuyu epokhu // Nauka i zh izn'. 2000. № 3 .
2. Dyutsh G.O. Pesni russkogo naroda: Sobrany v gub. Arkhangel'skoy i Olonetskoy v 1886 g. / Za-
pisali: slova F.M. Istomin, napevy G.O. Dyutsh. SPb.: Imper. rus. geogr. obshch-vo, 1894.
3. Zabelin I. Domashniy byt russkikh tsarey v XVI i XVII st. Chast' 2. SPb.: Sinodal'naya Tipo-
grafiya, 1915.
4. Zabelin I.E. Domashniy byt russkogo naroda v XVI i XVII st. 2-e izd. s dop. T. 1. M.: tip.
Gracheva i K°, 1872.
5. Koshman L.V. Istoriya russkoy kul'tury IX-XX vv. M., 2002.
6. Kul'turologiya: u chebnoe posobie / S ostavitel' i o tvet. red. A.A. Radugin. M.: Tsentr, 2001.
7. Nekrylova A.F. Russkie narodnye gorodskie prazdniki, uveseleniya i zrelishcha. Konets XVIII —
nachalo KhKh veka. SPb, 2004.
8. Opisanie Moskovii pri relyatsiyakh gr. Karleyla // Istoricheskaya biblioteka. 1879. № 5. S. 1-46.
9. Pryzhov I.G. Istoriya kabakov v Rossii v svyazi s istoriey russkogo naroda. 2-e izd. K azan':
Molodye sily, 1914.
10. Tanner B. Opisanie puteshestviya pol'skogo posol'stva v Moskvu v 1678 godu. M., 1891.
11. Tereshchenko A.V. Byt russkogo naroda / Soch. A. Tereshchenki. Ch. 1-7. SPb.: tip. M-va vn. del, 1848.
Ch. 4. Naryad.
12. Turenkov A.E. Banya: belorusskie pribautki. Dlya sred. golosa s f.-p. / Tekst narodnyy. M.:
Gos. muz. izd-vo, 1931.
13. Bath and stove in the russian ethnic tradition / V.A. Lipinskaya i dr. M.: In-t etnologii i an-
tropologii im. N. N. Miklukho-Maklaya RAN, 2004.
14. Miege Guy. Relation of three Embassies etc. performed by the Earle of Carlisle 1663/4. London,
1669. P. 79-80.
15. There’s no Moscow without baths: iz istorii moskovskogo byta / I. Gol'din. M.: In-t etnolo-
gii i a ntropologii RAN, 1999.

References (transliteration):
1. Bayburova R. Russkie v dopetrovskuyu epokhu // Nauka i zh izn'. 2000. № 3 .
2. Dyutsh G.O. Pesni russkogo naroda: Sobrany v gub. Arkhangel'skoy i Olonetskoy v 1886 g. / Za-
pisali: slova F.M. Istomin, napevy G.O. Dyutsh. SPb.: Imper. rus. geogr. obshch-vo, 1894.
3. Zabelin I. Domashniy byt russkikh tsarey v XVI i XVII st. Chast' 2. SPb.: Sinodal'naya Tipo-
grafiya, 1915.
4. Zabelin I.E. Domashniy byt russkogo naroda v XVI i XVII st. 2-e izd. s dop. T. 1. M.: tip.
Gracheva i K°, 1872.
5. Koshman L.V. Istoriya russkoy kul'tury IX-XX vv. M., 2002.
6. Kul'turologiya: u chebnoe posobie / S ostavitel' i o tvet. red. A.A. Radugin. M.: Tsentr, 2001.
7. Nekrylova A.F. Russkie narodnye gorodskie prazdniki, uveseleniya i zrelishcha. Konets XVIII —
nachalo KhKh veka. SPb, 2004.
8. Opisanie Moskovii pri relyatsiyakh gr. Karleyla // Istoricheskaya biblioteka. 1879. № 5. S. 1-46.
9. Pryzhov I.G. Istoriya kabakov v Rossii v svyazi s istoriey russkogo naroda. 2-e izd. K azan':
Molodye sily, 1914.
10. Tanner B. Opisanie puteshestviya pol'skogo posol'stva v Moskvu v 1678 godu. M., 1891.
11. Tereshchenko A.V. Byt russkogo naroda / Soch. A. Tereshchenki. Ch. 1-7. SPb.: tip. M-va vn. del, 1848.
Ch. 4. Naryad.
12. Turenkov A.E. Banya: belorusskie pribautki. Dlya sred. golosa s f.-p. / Tekst narodnyy. M.:
Gos. muz. izd-vo, 1931.
13. Bath and stove in the russian ethnic tradition / V.A. Lipinskaya i dr. M.: In-t etnologii i an-
tropologii im. N. N. Miklukho-Maklaya RAN, 2004.
14. Miege Guy. Relation of three Embassies etc. performed by the Earle of Carlisle 1663/4. London,
1669. P. 79-80.
15. There’s no Moscow without baths: iz istorii moskovskogo byta / I. Gol'din. M.: In-t etnolo-
gii i a ntropologii RAN, 1999.

Abstract: The epoch of globalization is characterized by a paradox combination of the growth of multi-ethnocultural interactions, population and genetic shift of peoples and reinforcement of ethnic identity at the same time. However, there are still vivid debates around the terms ‘ethnos’ and ‘nation’ between primordialists and constructivists in Russian philosophy and ethnology. It also gave birth to a new interpretation anthropology which studies cultural differences and meanings of human activity and various social coalitions in comparison with discrete units of anthropological (ethnological) analysis and relations between them.

Keywords: philosophy, human, globalization, culture, ethnos, integrity, anthropology, self-consciousness, primordialists, constructivists.

References:
1. Gachev G. Natsional'nyy kosmo-psikho-logos // Gachev G. Natsional'nye obrazy mira. Sosedi Rossii:
Pol'sha, Litva, Estoniya. M.: Progress — Traditsiya, 2003.
2. Foks K. Nablyudaya za anglichanami. Skrytye pravila povedeniya / per. s angl. M.: RIPOL klassik, 2008.
3. Keyt Foks. Nablyudaya za anglichanami. Skrytye pravila povedeniya. M.: RIPOL klassik, 2008.
4. Khobsbaum E. Natsii i natsionalizm posle 1780 g. SPb, 1998.
5. Fox Kate. Watching The English. The Hidden Rules of English behavior, 2004.
6. Collet P. and Furnham A. Social Psychology at Work. London: Routledge, 1995.

References (transliteration):
1. Gachev G. Natsional'nyy kosmo-psikho-logos // Gachev G. Natsional'nye obrazy mira. Sosedi Rossii:
Pol'sha, Litva, Estoniya. M.: Progress — Traditsiya, 2003.
2. Foks K. Nablyudaya za anglichanami. Skrytye pravila povedeniya / per. s angl. M.: RIPOL klassik, 2008.
3. Keyt Foks. Nablyudaya za anglichanami. Skrytye pravila povedeniya. M.: RIPOL klassik, 2008.
4. Khobsbaum E. Natsii i natsionalizm posle 1780 g. SPb, 1998.
5. Fox Kate. Watching The English. The Hidden Rules of English behavior, 2004.
6. Collet P. and Furnham A. Social Psychology at Work. London: Routledge, 1995.

Abstract: The article reveals the spiritual basis of the Russian nation. The author defines the fundamental basis of the personal ‘integrity’ which is, at the same time, the measure of personal spirituality. The author studies the concepts of ‘spirit’ and ‘spirituality’ based on the classical tradition introduced first by Aristotle, Plato and Hegel and then by I. A. Ilyin, N. O. Lossky, V.S. Soloviev, E. N. Trubetskoy, P. A. Florensky, S. L. Frankl and other religious philosophers who represented the ideal-realism philosophy. The article also provides a detailed analysis of N. O. Lossky’s views on the Russian mentality.

Keywords: philosophy, spirituality, integrity, combination, character, duty, responsibility, personality, basis, people.

References:
1. Antropologiya sotsial'nogo tvorchestva / Pod red. K.P. Stozhko. — Ekaterinburg: ID «Styag'», 2011.
2. Berdyaev N. Filosofiya svobodnogo dukha. — M.: AST: AST MOSKVA: KhRANITEL', 2006.
3. Buber M. Problema cheloveka. — M., 1992.
4. Vysheslavtsev S. Russkiy natsional'nyy kharakter // Russkiy mir. Geopoliticheskie zametki po
russkoy istorii. — M.: Eksmo; SPb: Terra. 2003. — S. 639.
5. Gegel' G.V.F. Entsiklopediya filosofskikh nauk. V 3-kh tt. T. 1. — M., 1975-1977.
6. Doktrina informatsionnoy bezopasnosti Rossiyskoy Federatsii: utv. Prezidentom Rossiyskoy
Federatsii 9 sentyabrya 2000 goda № Pr-1895 // Rossiyskaya gazeta. — 2000. — 28 sent.
7. Efrem Sirin Prepodobnyy. Izbrannye tvoreniya. — M.: Izd-vo Sretenskogo monastyrya, 2006.
8. Zen'kovskiy V.V. Istoriya russkoy filosofii. — M.: Eksmo-Press, 2001.
9. Il'in I.A. Put' k ochevidnosti. — M.: Eksmo-Press, 1998.
10. Il'in I.A. Filosofiya kak dukhovnoe delanie // Russkaya filosofiya. Konets KhIKh — nachalo KhKh veka. —
SPb: Izd-vo S.-Peterburgskogo un-ta, 1993. — S. 457.
11. Levitskiy S.A. // Russkaya filosofiya. Konets KhIKh — nachalo KhKh veka. — SPb.: Izd-vo S.-Peterburgskogo
un-ta, 1993. — S. 394.
12. Losskiy N.O. Chuvstvennaya, intellektual'naya i misticheskaya intuitsiya. — M.: Respublika, 1995.
13. Losskiy N.O.Usloviya absolyutnogo dobra. — M.: Politizdat, 1991.
14. Mur Dzh.E. Priroda moral'no filosofii / Per. s angl. — M.: Respublika, 1999.
15. Motorina L.E. Filosofskaya antropologiya. — M.: Akademicheskiy Proekt, 2009.
16. Spirkin A.G. Soznanie i samosoznanie. — M., 1972.
17. Shumikhina L.A. Genezis russkoy dukhovnosti. — Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural. un-ta, 1999.

References (transliteration):
1. Antropologiya sotsial'nogo tvorchestva / Pod red. K.P. Stozhko. — Ekaterinburg: ID «Styag'», 2011.
2. Berdyaev N. Filosofiya svobodnogo dukha. — M.: AST: AST MOSKVA: KhRANITEL', 2006.
3. Buber M. Problema cheloveka. — M., 1992.
4. Vysheslavtsev S. Russkiy natsional'nyy kharakter // Russkiy mir. Geopoliticheskie zametki po
russkoy istorii. — M.: Eksmo; SPb: Terra. 2003. — S. 639.
5. Gegel' G.V.F. Entsiklopediya filosofskikh nauk. V 3-kh tt. T. 1. — M., 1975-1977.
6. Doktrina informatsionnoy bezopasnosti Rossiyskoy Federatsii: utv. Prezidentom Rossiyskoy
Federatsii 9 sentyabrya 2000 goda № Pr-1895 // Rossiyskaya gazeta. — 2000. — 28 sent.
7. Efrem Sirin Prepodobnyy. Izbrannye tvoreniya. — M.: Izd-vo Sretenskogo monastyrya, 2006.
8. Zen'kovskiy V.V. Istoriya russkoy filosofii. — M.: Eksmo-Press, 2001.
9. Il'in I.A. Put' k ochevidnosti. — M.: Eksmo-Press, 1998.
10. Il'in I.A. Filosofiya kak dukhovnoe delanie // Russkaya filosofiya. Konets KhIKh — nachalo KhKh veka. —
SPb: Izd-vo S.-Peterburgskogo un-ta, 1993. — S. 457.
11. Levitskiy S.A. // Russkaya filosofiya. Konets KhIKh — nachalo KhKh veka. — SPb.: Izd-vo S.-Peterburgskogo
un-ta, 1993. — S. 394.
12. Losskiy N.O. Chuvstvennaya, intellektual'naya i misticheskaya intuitsiya. — M.: Respublika, 1995.
13. Losskiy N.O.Usloviya absolyutnogo dobra. — M.: Politizdat, 1991.
14. Mur Dzh.E. Priroda moral'no filosofii / Per. s angl. — M.: Respublika, 1999.
15. Motorina L.E. Filosofskaya antropologiya. — M.: Akademicheskiy Proekt, 2009.
16. Spirkin A.G. Soznanie i samosoznanie. — M., 1972.
17. Shumikhina L.A. Genezis russkoy dukhovnosti. — Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural. un-ta, 1999.

Abstract: The questions of international cultural co-operation are gaining growing importance in modern international relations. Nowadays there is not a single country which wouldn’t pay attention at the problems of building solid cultural and scientific contacts with other nations. Many modern researches and politicians believe that being the process of spiritual, creative and intellectual communication, culture suggests the process of mutual enrichment with new ideas in the context of cultural exchange, and thus, plays an important communicative role uniting groups of people of diverse social, ethnical and religious characteristics

Keywords: cultural studies, cultural policy, universal language, multi-cultiralism, globalization in culture, creative process, cultural heritage, dialogue, in the sphere of culture

Contact information: Yatvetsky Boleslaw Valentinovich, bhpublish@gmail.com

References:
Bogolyubova N.M., Nikolaeva Yu.V. Vneshnyaya kul'turnaya politika Rossii i zarubezhnykh stran. SPb., 2008. S. 50-51.
Bogolyubova N.M., Nikolaeva Yu.V. Kul'turnyy obmen v sisteme mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy. SPb., 2003. S. 24.
Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie v sfere kul'tury: opyt, problemy, puti razvitiya: Materialy resp. nauch.-prakt. konf., 6 dekabrya 2000 g. / Nauch. red. N.M. Mukharyamov. Kazan', 2001. S. 38.
Eshche odno leto proshlo pod znakom Taglita. http://il4u.org.il/Israel/Centers/Moscow/OurProjects/TaglitProject/
Igra Aktivnaya rol'. http://il4u.org.il/Israel/Centers/Moscow/OurProjects/Game_active-role/
Intellektual'noe kazino. http://il4u.org.il/Israel/Centers/Moscow/OurProjects/Intellectual Casino/
Klub izrail'skikh traditsiy Sikha. http://il4u.org.i/Israel/Centers/Moscow/OurProjects/Clu b_Siha/
Nay Dzh. Soft power, ili «myagkaya sila» gosudarstva // Al'manakh «Vostok». 2006. № 5 (41). http://www.situa tion.ru/app/j_art_1165.htm. 15.05.2010.
Tribrat V. «Myagkaya bezopasnost'» po Dzhozefu Nayu // Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. Zhurnal teorii mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy i mirovoy politiki. http://www.intertrends.ru/seventh/014.htm.16.05.2010.

References (transliteration):
Bogolyubova N.M., Nikolaeva Yu.V. Vneshnyaya kul'turnaya politika Rossii i zarubezhnykh stran. SPb., 2008. S. 50-51.
Bogolyubova N.M., Nikolaeva Yu.V. Kul'turnyy obmen v sisteme mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy. SPb., 2003. S. 24.
Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie v sfere kul'tury: opyt, problemy, puti razvitiya: Materialy resp. nauch.-prakt. konf., 6 dekabrya 2000 g. / Nauch. red. N.M. Mukharyamov. Kazan', 2001. S. 38.
Eshche odno leto proshlo pod znakom Taglita. http://il4u.org.il/Israel/Centers/Moscow/OurProjects/TaglitProject/
Igra Aktivnaya rol'. http://il4u.org.il/Israel/Centers/Moscow/OurProjects/Game_active-role/
Intellektual'noe kazino. http://il4u.org.il/Israel/Centers/Moscow/OurProjects/Intellectual Casino/
Klub izrail'skikh traditsiy Sikha. http://il4u.org.i/Israel/Centers/Moscow/OurProjects/Clu b_Siha/
Nay Dzh. Soft power, ili «myagkaya sila» gosudarstva // Al'manakh «Vostok». 2006. № 5 (41). http://www.situa tion.ru/app/j_art_1165.htm. 15.05.2010.
Tribrat V. «Myagkaya bezopasnost'» po Dzhozefu Nayu // Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. Zhurnal teorii mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy i mirovoy politiki. http://www.intertrends.ru/seventh/014.htm.16.05.2010.

Abstract: The article claims that formation f the Russian civil nation is one of the directions of consolidation of the Russian society. Russian ethnical culture is viewed as the basics of Russian culture and Russian nation. It is supposed that the openness of the Russian personality and Russian culture enable representatives of other ethnos both to join them and to participate in their development

Keywords: cultural studies, society, nation, ethnos, culture, Russian, consolidation, assimilation, multi-culturalism

Contact information: Shilov Vladimir Nikolaevich, Shilov@bsu.edu.ru

References:
Veretevskaya A.V. Znachenie i znachimost' mul'tikul'turalizma // Politicheskaya nauka. 2010. № 1.
Vostrikov S.V. Rossiya v mire gryadushchego: prognozy i perspektivy // Sotsial'no-gumanitarnye znaniya. 200№ 4.
Gibadullin R.M. Postsovetskiy diskurs natsii kak problema mezhetnicheskogo edinstva Rossii // Vlast'. 2010. № 1.
Drobizheva L.M. Protsessy grazhdanskoy integratsii v polietnicheskom rossiyskom obshchestve // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2008. № 2.
Kazintsev A. Vozvrashchenie mass. Chast' IV. Rossiya, bednaya Rossiya // Nash sovremennik. 2009. № 8.
Medvedeva O.O. Diskussiya o mul'tikul'turalizme i aktual'nye problemy sotsial'noy politiki gosudarstva // Izvestiya Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A.I. Gertsena. 2009. № 119.
Meleshkina E.Yu. Formirovanie gosudarstv i natsiy v usloviyakh etnokul'turnoy raznorodnosti: teoreticheskie podkhody i istoricheskaya praktika // Politicheskaya nauka. 2010. № 1.
Miller A.I. Debaty o natsii v sovremennoy Rossii // Politicheskaya nauka. 2008. № 1.
Osnovnye itogi Vserossiyskoy perepisi naseleniya 2002 goda [Elektronnyy resurs] URL: 2. www.gks.ru/PEREPIS/osnitogi.htm (Data obrashcheniya: 15.06.2010).
Sevast'yanov A. Semnadtsat' mgnoveniy istiny // Nash sovremennik. 200№ 10. 3.
Semanov S. Byt' russkim dostoyno est' // Nash sovremennik. 20№ 1. 8.
Tishkov V.A. Chto est' Rossiya i rossiyskiy narod // Pro et Contra. 2007. № 3.9.
Fedosov P.A. Gosudarstvennoe regulirovanie etnopoliticheskikh i etnosotsial'nykh protsessov v Ros10. siyskoy Federatsii // Politicheskaya nauka. 2010. № 1.
Shabaev Yu.P. «Buntuyushchaya etnichnost'» na Evropeyskom Severe Rossii // Obshchestvennye nauki i so11. vremennost'. 2006. № 3.

References (transliteration):
Veretevskaya A.V. Znachenie i znachimost' mul'tikul'turalizma // Politicheskaya nauka. 2010. № 1.
Vostrikov S.V. Rossiya v mire gryadushchego: prognozy i perspektivy // Sotsial'no-gumanitarnye znaniya. 200№ 4.
Gibadullin R.M. Postsovetskiy diskurs natsii kak problema mezhetnicheskogo edinstva Rossii // Vlast'. 2010. № 1.
Drobizheva L.M. Protsessy grazhdanskoy integratsii v polietnicheskom rossiyskom obshchestve // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2008. № 2.
Kazintsev A. Vozvrashchenie mass. Chast' IV. Rossiya, bednaya Rossiya // Nash sovremennik. 2009. № 8.
Medvedeva O.O. Diskussiya o mul'tikul'turalizme i aktual'nye problemy sotsial'noy politiki gosudarstva // Izvestiya Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A.I. Gertsena. 2009. № 119.
Meleshkina E.Yu. Formirovanie gosudarstv i natsiy v usloviyakh etnokul'turnoy raznorodnosti: teoreticheskie podkhody i istoricheskaya praktika // Politicheskaya nauka. 2010. № 1.
Miller A.I. Debaty o natsii v sovremennoy Rossii // Politicheskaya nauka. 2008. № 1.
Osnovnye itogi Vserossiyskoy perepisi naseleniya 2002 goda [Elektronnyy resurs] URL: 2. www.gks.ru/PEREPIS/osnitogi.htm (Data obrashcheniya: 15.06.2010).
Sevast'yanov A. Semnadtsat' mgnoveniy istiny // Nash sovremennik. 200№ 10. 3.
Semanov S. Byt' russkim dostoyno est' // Nash sovremennik. 20№ 1. 8.
Tishkov V.A. Chto est' Rossiya i rossiyskiy narod // Pro et Contra. 2007. № 3.9.
Fedosov P.A. Gosudarstvennoe regulirovanie etnopoliticheskikh i etnosotsial'nykh protsessov v Ros10. siyskoy Federatsii // Politicheskaya nauka. 2010. № 1.
Shabaev Yu.P. «Buntuyushchaya etnichnost'» na Evropeyskom Severe Rossii // Obshchestvennye nauki i so11. vremennost'. 2006. № 3.

Abstract: The article considers the three stages of social and cultural transformation of Russia: slow accumulation of cultural and educational potentials starting from book printing and lasting up to the beginning of the 20th century; Stalin’s ‘cultural revolution’ when the cultural space was reconstructed and became the field of agenda, indoctrination and Stalin’s ideology; and the hidden ‘Westernization’ when the elements of consumer society ripened during the so called ‘period of stagnation’. The end of the latter led the Russian society to the period of regeneration of social and cultural tissue which had been lost before (the so called ‘perestroika’) and to the Internet revolution at the beginning of the 21st century.

Keywords: modernization, social and cultural transformation, Westernization, culture, formation, ‘cultural revolution’, ‘period of stagnation’

Contact information: Korolev Sergey Alekseevich, s_k_1799@list.ru

References:
Akhiezer A.S. Rossiya: kritika istoricheskogo opyta. Tt. 1-3. — M.: Izd-vo FO SSSR, 199— T. 2. — 1. S. 265-270.
Ionin L.G. Sotsiologiya kul'tury. — M.: 1996. — S.165.
Korolev S.A. Donos v Rossii. Sotsial'no—filosofskie ocherki. — M.: Progress—Mul'timedia, 1996. — S. 44-60.
Korolev S.A. Modernizatsiya i demodernizatsiya v rossiyskoy istorii. Chast' I // Filosofiya i kul'tura. — 2009. — № 1.
Mamardashvili M. Kak ya ponimayu filosofiyu. — M.: Progress, 1990. — S. 66.
Myatnikov I. V. Gosudarstvennaya politika Rossii v oblasti narodnogo obrazovaniya v nachale XX veka: diss. ... kand. istoricheskikh nauk: 07.00.02. — Kursk, 2005.
Pozdeeva I.V. Izdanie i rasprostranenie uchebnoy literatury v XVII v.: Moskovskiy pechatnyy dvor // Ocherki istorii shkoly i pedagogicheskoy mysli narodov SSSR s drevneyshikh vremen do kontsa XVII v. M. — 1989. — S.173.
Pozdeeva I.V., Dadykin A.V., Pushkov V.P. Moskovskiy pechatnyy dvor — fakt i faktor russkoy kul'tury. 1652-1700 gody. Issledovaniya i publikatsii. Kn.1. — M.: Nauka, 2007. — S. 10—11.
Rakitov A.I. Novyy podkhod k vzaimosvyazi istorii, informatsii i kul'tury: primer Rossii // Voprosy filosofii. — 1994. — № 4.
Rossiyskaya modernizatsiya: problemy i perspektivy («kruglyy stol») // Voprosy filosofii. — 1993. — № 7. — S.4.
Tolstykh V.I. V zerkale tvorchestva: (V. Vysotskiy kak yavlenie kul'tury) // Voprosy filosofii. — 1986. — № 7.

References (transliteration):
Akhiezer A.S. Rossiya: kritika istoricheskogo opyta. Tt. 1-3. — M.: Izd-vo FO SSSR, 199— T. 2. — 1. S. 265-270.
Ionin L.G. Sotsiologiya kul'tury. — M.: 1996. — S.165.
Korolev S.A. Donos v Rossii. Sotsial'no—filosofskie ocherki. — M.: Progress—Mul'timedia, 1996. — S. 44-60.
Korolev S.A. Modernizatsiya i demodernizatsiya v rossiyskoy istorii. Chast' I // Filosofiya i kul'tura. — 2009. — № 1.
Mamardashvili M. Kak ya ponimayu filosofiyu. — M.: Progress, 1990. — S. 66.
Myatnikov I. V. Gosudarstvennaya politika Rossii v oblasti narodnogo obrazovaniya v nachale XX veka: diss. ... kand. istoricheskikh nauk: 07.00.02. — Kursk, 2005.
Pozdeeva I.V. Izdanie i rasprostranenie uchebnoy literatury v XVII v.: Moskovskiy pechatnyy dvor // Ocherki istorii shkoly i pedagogicheskoy mysli narodov SSSR s drevneyshikh vremen do kontsa XVII v. M. — 1989. — S.173.
Pozdeeva I.V., Dadykin A.V., Pushkov V.P. Moskovskiy pechatnyy dvor — fakt i faktor russkoy kul'tury. 1652-1700 gody. Issledovaniya i publikatsii. Kn.1. — M.: Nauka, 2007. — S. 10—11.
Rakitov A.I. Novyy podkhod k vzaimosvyazi istorii, informatsii i kul'tury: primer Rossii // Voprosy filosofii. — 1994. — № 4.
Rossiyskaya modernizatsiya: problemy i perspektivy («kruglyy stol») // Voprosy filosofii. — 1993. — № 7. — S.4.
Tolstykh V.I. V zerkale tvorchestva: (V. Vysotskiy kak yavlenie kul'tury) // Voprosy filosofii. — 1986. — № 7.

Abstract: Review: the phenomenon of ethnicity is usually viewed in the social, cultural and psychological aspect. However, according to the author of the article, ethnicity can be analyzed as an anthropological problem. In that case, the phenomenon becomes part of the anthropological teaching. The author illustrated his idea with Kant’s views on the national character. Being a philosophical anthropologist, that German philosopher tried to find out how different peoples reacted to beautiful things and ideas

Keywords: philosophy, psychology, philosophical anthropology, ethnicity, national character, aesthetic sensitivity, feeling, spirit

Abstract: Abstract: the article is devoted to the pseudomorphosis as a specific mechanism of development in the Russian history. The author identified the two forms of pseudomorphosis, the classical form described by Spengler and the “organic” form, the unique mirror reflection of the former. Special attention is paid to the role and place of disciplinary technologies in the structure of speudomorphic drivers in the government. In particular, the author showed that despite Spengler and a number of his followers, the government in Russia was characterized by the macro technological structure dominating over weak European disciplinary mechanisms.

Keywords: pseudomorphosis, civilization, disciplinary technologies, inversion, civil society, Spengler, Florensky, Tsymbursky, Ahieze.

Contact information: Korolev, S. A., nb-media@mail.ru

Abstract: The article is devoted to analyzing the main peculiarity of Russian philosophizing, - primary epistemological beliefs of the “synthetical paradigm”. Russian philosophizing is based on the idea of wholeness of existence and the idea of complementability of all forms of experiencing it from conception thinking and image perception, cold rationality and “believing mind” to intuition and mystical perception of the world.

Abstract: Understanding of Russia’s way continues to be an issue now as it already was a hundred years ago. Having refused from the communistic values and Soviet) dream of building an ideal society all over the world, Russian public opinion is now concerned about what to offer instead. What values a new strategy of development should be based on? It is especially difficult to say after we failed to adopt Western reforms without taking into account peculiarities of the Russian mentality. As A. I. Solzhenitsyn once said, in order to lead such a great country as Russia is, it is necessary to feel all the centuries of its history. Otherwise the country might lose more than get.

Abstract: The author analysed various “national character” concepts and showed the role of national stereotypes in formation and destruction of the national character as a phenomenon. At the same time, the author spoke of specific methods for studying the national character. He also described types of personalities and personal traits.