Reference:
Litvintseva G.Yu..
Deconstruction in Post-Modernistic Texts of Literature and Art
// Philosophy and Culture. – 2015. – № 4.
– P. 582-592.
DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2015.4.12676.
rubric Философия постмодернизма
DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2015.4.12676
Read the article
Abstract: The present article is devoted to deconstruction as the leading category of post-modernism as well as the method of composing post-modernistic literary and art texts aimed at critisizing traditional analytical thinking, decentration of different kinds of centralisms, removal of binary oppositions and search for conceptual multiplicity. Moreover, the author of the article describes such features of post-modernistic texts as intertextuality, nonclassical interpretation of past traditions in the ironic, playful or parodical form. The author also tries to define the general and specific features of deconstruction in foreign and Russian literary and art texts. Based on the analysis of philosophical, cultural, literary and art researches, the author describes the features of deconstruction. The author has used the comparative method to analyze foreign and Russian post-modernistic texts of literature and art. The author concludes that while American and Western European post-modernists perform the deconstruction of the ideology of the consumer society, Russian post-modernists deconstruct the consumption of products of the Soviet ideology. Americans and Western European post-modernists use deconstruction in order to create a free player space, to make the most important issues of human existence to be the aim of the play, and to view traditions from the point of view of the democratic pluralism, while Russian post-modernists deconstuct such 'national metanarratives' as 'ideologism', 'totalitarianism', 'utopism' and 'literature-centrism'. These allow to understand our traditional 'eternal' issues using nontraditional means such as obscene words and shocking naturalistic and physiological descriptions. The author's conclusion that deconstruction acts as a mean of creating a new language capable of describing framentary, orderless, unstable and hyperreal post-modern world is crucial for understanding and adequate perception of post-modernistic texts.
Keywords: decentration, intertextuality, multiple meaning, irony, parody, play, absurdity, metanarrative, hyperreality, simulacrum
References:
Bart R. Smert' avtora // Bart R. Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika. Poetika.-M.,1994. – S.384-391.
Berg M. Literaturokratiya. Problema prisvoeniya i pereosmysleniya vlasti v literature.-M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2000. – 352 s.
Bodriyyar Zh.Amerika.-SPb.,2000. – 123 s.
Bodriyyar Zh.Obshchestvo potrebleniya. Ego mify i struktura.-M.: Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya; Respublika,2006. – 272 s.
Groys B.Vechnoe vozvrashchenie novogo//Iskusstvo, 1989, №10. – S.1-2.
Delez Zh.Logika smysla.-M.: Akademiya /Ekaterinburg: IPP Ural. Rabochiy, 1995. – 474 s.
Derrida Zh. Pis'mo yaponskomu drugu// Voprosy filosofii, 1992, №4. – S.53-57.
Derrida Zh. Interv'yu s Zhakom Derrida// Arbor Mundi / Mirovoe derevo. 1992. Vyp.1. – S.73-80.
Dianova V.M. Postmodernistskaya filosofiya iskusstva: istoki i sovremennost'.-SPb.: Petropolis, 1999. – 240 s.
Dolinin A. Palomnichestvo Charl'za Smitsona // Faulz. Dzh. Podruga frantsuzskogo leytenanta. — L.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1985. – S.13-18.
Il'in I.P. Dekonstruktivizm// Sovremennoe zarubezhnoe literaturovedenie. Kontseptsii. Shkoly. Terminy: Entsiklopedicheskiy spravochnik.-M.:Intrada,1996. – S. 118.
Il'in I.P. Poststrukturalizm. Dekonstruktivizm. Postmodernizm.-M.: Intrada, 1996. – 255 s.
Kerimov T.Kh. Intertekstual'nost' // Sovremennyy filosofskiy slovar'.-M.; Bishkek; Ekaterinburg: Odissey,1996. – S.228.
Kristeva Yu. Bakhtin, slovo, dialog i roman // Dialog. Karnaval. Khronotop,1993, №4. – S.5-24.
Kuritsyn V. K situatsii postmodernizma // Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 1994, N 11. – S.197-223.
Lipovetskiy M.N. Russkiy postmodernizm. Ocherki istoricheskoy poetiki.-Ekaterinburg,1997. – 317 s.
Litvintseva G.Yu. Dekonstruktsiya «natsional'nykh metanarrativov» v rossiyskom postmodernizme// Kontsept.-2014.-Sovremennye nauchnye issledovaniya. Vypusk 2. – ART 54636.-URL: http://e-koncept.ru/2014/54636.htm.
Man'kovskaya N.B. «Parizh so zmeyami» (Vvedenie v estetiku postmodernizma). – M.: IFRAN, 1995. – 220 s.
Podoroga V. Kairos, kriticheskiy moment. Aktual'noe proizvedenie iskusstva na marshe. M.: Grundrisse, 2013. – 180 s.
Ryklin M.K. Mishel' Fuko: myslitel' literaturoy// Esteticheskiy logos.-M., 1990. – S. 94-102.
Skoropanova I.S. Russkaya postmodernistskaya literatura. M.: izd-vo «Flinta», «Nauka», 2004. – 608 s.
Sokolov B. Moya kniga o Vladimire Sorokine.-M.: AIRO, 2005. – 224 s.
Khabermas Yu. Filosofskiy diskurs o moderne.-M.: izd-vo «Ves' mir», 2003. – 416 s.
Khart K. Postmodernizm. – M.: Grand – Fair, 2006. – 272 s.
Eko U. Otkrytost' proizvedeniya iskusstva//Nekotorye problemy sovremennoy zarubezhnoy estetiki. Sb. perevodov i referatov. V 2-kh ch.-M., 1976. Ch. 2. – S.22-26.
Jameson F. Postmodernism or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Duke University Press, 1991.-461 p.
Salincscu M. Ways of Looking and fiction // Romanticism, Modernism, Postmodernism, Ed. By Harry R. Garvin. Lewisburgh: Bucknell UP, 1980. – P. 36-49.
References (transliteration):
Bart R. Smert' avtora // Bart R. Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika. Poetika.-M.,1994. – S.384-391.
Berg M. Literaturokratiya. Problema prisvoeniya i pereosmysleniya vlasti v literature.-M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2000. – 352 s.
Bodriyyar Zh.Amerika.-SPb.,2000. – 123 s.
Bodriyyar Zh.Obshchestvo potrebleniya. Ego mify i struktura.-M.: Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya; Respublika,2006. – 272 s.
Groys B.Vechnoe vozvrashchenie novogo//Iskusstvo, 1989, №10. – S.1-2.
Delez Zh.Logika smysla.-M.: Akademiya /Ekaterinburg: IPP Ural. Rabochiy, 1995. – 474 s.
Derrida Zh. Pis'mo yaponskomu drugu// Voprosy filosofii, 1992, №4. – S.53-57.
Derrida Zh. Interv'yu s Zhakom Derrida// Arbor Mundi / Mirovoe derevo. 1992. Vyp.1. – S.73-80.
Dianova V.M. Postmodernistskaya filosofiya iskusstva: istoki i sovremennost'.-SPb.: Petropolis, 1999. – 240 s.
Dolinin A. Palomnichestvo Charl'za Smitsona // Faulz. Dzh. Podruga frantsuzskogo leytenanta. — L.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1985. – S.13-18.
Il'in I.P. Dekonstruktivizm// Sovremennoe zarubezhnoe literaturovedenie. Kontseptsii. Shkoly. Terminy: Entsiklopedicheskiy spravochnik.-M.:Intrada,1996. – S. 118.
Il'in I.P. Poststrukturalizm. Dekonstruktivizm. Postmodernizm.-M.: Intrada, 1996. – 255 s.
Kerimov T.Kh. Intertekstual'nost' // Sovremennyy filosofskiy slovar'.-M.; Bishkek; Ekaterinburg: Odissey,1996. – S.228.
Kristeva Yu. Bakhtin, slovo, dialog i roman // Dialog. Karnaval. Khronotop,1993, №4. – S.5-24.
Kuritsyn V. K situatsii postmodernizma // Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 1994, N 11. – S.197-223.
Lipovetskiy M.N. Russkiy postmodernizm. Ocherki istoricheskoy poetiki.-Ekaterinburg,1997. – 317 s.
Litvintseva G.Yu. Dekonstruktsiya «natsional'nykh metanarrativov» v rossiyskom postmodernizme// Kontsept.-2014.-Sovremennye nauchnye issledovaniya. Vypusk 2. – ART 54636.-URL: http://e-koncept.ru/2014/54636.htm.
Man'kovskaya N.B. «Parizh so zmeyami» (Vvedenie v estetiku postmodernizma). – M.: IFRAN, 1995. – 220 s.
Podoroga V. Kairos, kriticheskiy moment. Aktual'noe proizvedenie iskusstva na marshe. M.: Grundrisse, 2013. – 180 s.
Ryklin M.K. Mishel' Fuko: myslitel' literaturoy// Esteticheskiy logos.-M., 1990. – S. 94-102.
Skoropanova I.S. Russkaya postmodernistskaya literatura. M.: izd-vo «Flinta», «Nauka», 2004. – 608 s.
Sokolov B. Moya kniga o Vladimire Sorokine.-M.: AIRO, 2005. – 224 s.
Khabermas Yu. Filosofskiy diskurs o moderne.-M.: izd-vo «Ves' mir», 2003. – 416 s.
Khart K. Postmodernizm. – M.: Grand – Fair, 2006. – 272 s.
Eko U. Otkrytost' proizvedeniya iskusstva//Nekotorye problemy sovremennoy zarubezhnoy estetiki. Sb. perevodov i referatov. V 2-kh ch.-M., 1976. Ch. 2. – S.22-26.
Jameson F. Postmodernism or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Duke University Press, 1991.-461 p.
Salincscu M. Ways of Looking and fiction // Romanticism, Modernism, Postmodernism, Ed. By Harry R. Garvin. Lewisburgh: Bucknell UP, 1980. – P. 36-49.
Eng
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
© 1998 – 2023 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
