Abstract: The subject of this research is the transformation of time and space (transformation of time into space). Substantiation in this case is the reduction to the core, which allows restoring the contours of the phenomena, space-time in their certainty and distinction to the preceding. As the historical-logical “foundation”, the author establishes the specific state that reconciles with “eternity”, and at the same time with the typical integral sacred. It is demonstrated that the most essential side is the transformation if the “internal” and “external”, at the same time, things such as states correspond to the “space” of the external and “time” of the internal that have developed within them. The method of the research is substantiated by the analysis and reconstruction of the notions of “time” and “space” in their transformation; the most significant feature of this method is the gradual reconciliation of the anthropological and logical forms (category of own-Other, connected by the logically transgressive transition). The scientific novelty lies in formulation of the category of “transformation” that is historically preceding to attribution of dyads of reciprocal of internal/external and time/space. The author is first to review the space and time as sub specie aeternitatis of pragmatic outcome and transcendental sensibility. The latter in its unconditionality (transcendental antinomia) suggest the possibility of correlation of the dyads in form of external-spatial (antagonism forces) and internal-timely (dramatism of feelings).

Keywords: biography, practice, ritual, transport, handling, space, eternity, Time, linearity, subject

References:
Istoriya pervobytnogo obshchestva. Epokha pervobytnoy rodovoy obshchiny. Obshch. Red. Bromley Yu. V. M., Nauka, 1986. S. 510.
M. Fuko. Slova i veshchi. SPb. A-cad,1994. S. 54.
Deskola F. Po tu storonu prirody i kul'tury. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2012. S. 57.
Freydenberg O. M. Poetika syuzheta i zhanra. M., «Labirint», 1997. s. 227, s. 237.
Eliade M. Shamanizm: arkhaicheskie tekhniki ekstaza. Kiev, 1989. s. 160.
Sauer Josef. Die Symbolik des Kirchengebäudes in der Auffassung des Mittelalters: mit Berücksichtigung von Honorius Augustodunensis, Sicardus und Durandus. Freiburg i. Br., 1902. (2. Aufl. 1924). S. 3-4.
Anisimov A.F. Istoricheskie osobennosti pervobytnogo myshleniya. L., 1971. 137 s.
Steblin-Kamenskiy M.I. Mif. Leningrad: «Nauka», 1976. s. 43, s. 36-37, s. 39-40.
Toporov V. N. Prostranstvo i tekst // Tekst: Semantika i struktura. M., 1983. S. 232.
Gachev G. Natsional'nye obrazy mira. Kosmo-Psikho-Logos. M., 1995. S. 170, s. 171.
Godel'e M. Zagadka dara. M.: Vost. literatura, 2007. S. 137.
Spektor D.M. «Tretiy put': mezhdu instinktom i osoznaniem» // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. 2015. ¹ 1. S. 50-59.
Borko T.I. Shamanizm: Ot arkhaicheskikh verovaniy k religioznomu kul'tu. Ekaterinburg: Izdatel'stvo «Bank kul'turnoy informatsii», 2004. s. 43, s. 50, s. 42-43.
Meletinskiy B.M. Poetika mifa. 3-e izd., reprintnoe. M.: Izdatel'skaya firma «Vostochnaya literatura» RAN, 2000. s. 173, s. 232, s. 248, s. 51-52.
Eliade M. Ocherki sravnitel'nogo religiovedeniya. M.: «Ladomir». 1999. S. 389.
Eliade M. Kosmos i istoriya. M., 1997. S. 112.
Khyubner K. Istina mifa. M.: Respublika, 1996. S. 130, 173.

References (transliteration):
Istoriya pervobytnogo obshchestva. Epokha pervobytnoy rodovoy obshchiny. Obshch. Red. Bromley Yu. V. M., Nauka, 1986. S. 510.
M. Fuko. Slova i veshchi. SPb. A-cad,1994. S. 54.
Deskola F. Po tu storonu prirody i kul'tury. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2012. S. 57.
Freydenberg O. M. Poetika syuzheta i zhanra. M., «Labirint», 1997. s. 227, s. 237.
Eliade M. Shamanizm: arkhaicheskie tekhniki ekstaza. Kiev, 1989. s. 160.
Sauer Josef. Die Symbolik des Kirchengebäudes in der Auffassung des Mittelalters: mit Berücksichtigung von Honorius Augustodunensis, Sicardus und Durandus. Freiburg i. Br., 1902. (2. Aufl. 1924). S. 3-4.
Anisimov A.F. Istoricheskie osobennosti pervobytnogo myshleniya. L., 1971. 137 s.
Steblin-Kamenskiy M.I. Mif. Leningrad: «Nauka», 1976. s. 43, s. 36-37, s. 39-40.
Toporov V. N. Prostranstvo i tekst // Tekst: Semantika i struktura. M., 1983. S. 232.
Gachev G. Natsional'nye obrazy mira. Kosmo-Psikho-Logos. M., 1995. S. 170, s. 171.
Godel'e M. Zagadka dara. M.: Vost. literatura, 2007. S. 137.
Spektor D.M. «Tretiy put': mezhdu instinktom i osoznaniem» // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. 2015. ¹ 1. S. 50-59.
Borko T.I. Shamanizm: Ot arkhaicheskikh verovaniy k religioznomu kul'tu. Ekaterinburg: Izdatel'stvo «Bank kul'turnoy informatsii», 2004. s. 43, s. 50, s. 42-43.
Meletinskiy B.M. Poetika mifa. 3-e izd., reprintnoe. M.: Izdatel'skaya firma «Vostochnaya literatura» RAN, 2000. s. 173, s. 232, s. 248, s. 51-52.
Eliade M. Ocherki sravnitel'nogo religiovedeniya. M.: «Ladomir». 1999. S. 389.
Eliade M. Kosmos i istoriya. M., 1997. S. 112.
Khyubner K. Istina mifa. M.: Respublika, 1996. S. 130, 173.

Abstract: This article examines the key definitions of time and space. It is demonstrated that if time in the XX century attains the character of the ultimate ontological foundation substantiating the corresponding interpretations, then space, which within the framework of physical theories meets time, in philosophical searches, on the contrary, counterpoises time. Space is endowed with the role of “reservoir” that is close to the role of “immanent dwell”. Mainly on the example of M. Heidegger’s philosophy, the author demonstrate the incorrectness of such approach and substantiates the need for the new ontology, which interprets the space itself as an ontological condition for materialization (fulfill). The scientific novelty consists in enhancing “spatiality” with ontological importance. The author is firs to underline the specificity of the initial homogeneity of space and time, the uniting ambivalence of the “movement towards integral” (homogenous), which in space is designated as aestheticism, and in time – the “establishment” and “agonal confrontation” (heterogeneous); which in space is manifested as expansion and assignment-assimilation, while in time as the tempo and speed of the “organic” interaction.

Keywords: Transition, Rebirth, Being-towards-death, Magic, Body, Space, Strive, M. Heidegger’s philosophy, Being, Time

References:
Fuko M. Slova i veshchi. Arkheologiya gumanitarnykh nauk. Spb.: «A-cad», 1994.
Kerschensteiner J. Kosmos. Munchen, 1962.
Heidegger M. Sein und Zeit. Tubingen: Max Niemejer Verlag, 1960.
Tkachenko G. A. Kosmos, muzyka, ritual: Mif i estetika v «Lyuy-shi chunydyu».— M.: «Nauka». Glavnaya redaktsiya vostochnoy literatury, 1990. 284 s.
Malamud Sh. Ispech' mir : ritual i mysl' v drevney Indii. M.: «Nauka». Glavnaya redaktsiya vostochnoy literatury, 2005. 350 s.
Eliade M. Ocherki sravnitel'nogo religiovedeniya. M.: «Ladomir». 1999. 488 s.
Freydenberg O. M. Poetika syuzheta i zhanra. M., «Labirint», 1997. 448 s.
Meletinskiy B.M. Poetika mifa. 3-e izd., reprintnoe. M.: Izdatel'skaya firma «Vostochnaya literatura» RAN, 2000. 407 s.
Chernyakov A. G. Ontologiya vremeni. Bytie i vremya v filosofii Aristotelya, Gusserlya i Khaydeggera. SPb.: «Vysshaya religiozno-filosofskaya shkola», 2001. 460 s.
Gaydenko P.P. Vremya. Dlitel'nost'. Vechnost'. Problema vremeni v evropeyskoy filosofii i nauke. M.: «Progress-Traditsiya», 2006. 464 s.
Toporov V. N. Prostranstvo i tekst // Tekst: Semantika i struktura. M.: «Nauka», 1983. 303 s.
Steblin-Kamenskiy M.I. Mif. Leningrad: «Nauka», 1976. 104 s.

References (transliteration):
Fuko M. Slova i veshchi. Arkheologiya gumanitarnykh nauk. Spb.: «A-cad», 1994.
Kerschensteiner J. Kosmos. Munchen, 1962.
Heidegger M. Sein und Zeit. Tubingen: Max Niemejer Verlag, 1960.
Tkachenko G. A. Kosmos, muzyka, ritual: Mif i estetika v «Lyuy-shi chunydyu».— M.: «Nauka». Glavnaya redaktsiya vostochnoy literatury, 1990. 284 s.
Malamud Sh. Ispech' mir : ritual i mysl' v drevney Indii. M.: «Nauka». Glavnaya redaktsiya vostochnoy literatury, 2005. 350 s.
Eliade M. Ocherki sravnitel'nogo religiovedeniya. M.: «Ladomir». 1999. 488 s.
Freydenberg O. M. Poetika syuzheta i zhanra. M., «Labirint», 1997. 448 s.
Meletinskiy B.M. Poetika mifa. 3-e izd., reprintnoe. M.: Izdatel'skaya firma «Vostochnaya literatura» RAN, 2000. 407 s.
Chernyakov A. G. Ontologiya vremeni. Bytie i vremya v filosofii Aristotelya, Gusserlya i Khaydeggera. SPb.: «Vysshaya religiozno-filosofskaya shkola», 2001. 460 s.
Gaydenko P.P. Vremya. Dlitel'nost'. Vechnost'. Problema vremeni v evropeyskoy filosofii i nauke. M.: «Progress-Traditsiya», 2006. 464 s.
Toporov V. N. Prostranstvo i tekst // Tekst: Semantika i struktura. M.: «Nauka», 1983. 303 s.
Steblin-Kamenskiy M.I. Mif. Leningrad: «Nauka», 1976. 104 s.

Abstract: The subject of this research is the objective time as one of the possible approaches towards understanding of time in philosophy and as a category of metaphysics, as well as the peculiarities of the category of objective time as a subject of cognition. The author conducts explication and complex analysis of the main difficulties that are faced by the strategy of cognition of the objective time category within the modern analytical metaphysics. Among the main difficulties are the following: inability to gradually substantiate an objective nature of knowledge within the framework of the used in analytical metaphysics model of rationality; a rather spontaneous and restricted choice of categorical apparatus for the formation of the ontology of time, as well as their internal inconsistency; absence of a satisfactory solution of the problem of criteria for determination and choice of a true ontological theory of objective time. The article suggests an alternative strategy of cognition of the objective time in metaphysics, and formulates a list of its key positions. Scientific novelty consists in a comprehensive analysis of the objective time category as a subject of metaphysics. The key positions of the alternative strategy include: the establishment of correlation between the idea of objectiveness of time and the life conceptual questions, which allows suggesting an alternative view upon the idea on “useful” and “useless” metaphysics; consideration of the logical-theoretical model of time in unity with the metaphysical models of objective reality; use of the ideas on metaphysical referents of time. The author puts forward an assumption, according to which namely the category of objective time can become essential for the rebirth and successful development of the realistic metaphysics within the modern philosophy.

Keywords: ontology of time, metaphysics referents of time, metaphysics of time, ontology, metaphysics, real time, time, realism, ultimate reality, metodology of metaphysics

References:
Mamchur E.A. Ob'ektivnost' nauki i relyativizm (K diskussiyam v sovremennoy epistemologii). M., 2004. S. 64.
Craig W.L. Time and eternity: Exploring God’s Relationship to Time. Crossway, Wheaton, Illinois, 2001.
Callender C. Time’s Ontic Voltage // The Future of the Philosophy of Time / edited by Adrian Bardon. Routeledge, N.Y., L., 2012. P. 73-98.
Schurz G. Philosophy of Science: a Unified Approach. Routledge. N.Y., L., 2014.
McTaggart J.M.E. The Unreality of Time // The Philosophy of Time. Oxford University Press, 1993. P. 23-34.
Zima V.N. Problema temporal'nosti i sposobov ee predstavleniya v filosofii estestvennykh nauk // Filosofskie nauki, 2013. ¹ 5. S. 99-111.
Dyke H. On Methodology in the Metaphysics of Time // The Future of the Philosophy of Time / edited by Adrian Bardon. Routeledge, N.Y., L., 2012. P. 169-217.
Le Poidevin R., MacBeath. Introduction // The Philosophy of Time. Oxford University Press, 1993. P. 1-20.
Zima V.N. Parmenid i staticheskaya kontseptsiya vremeni // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2013. ¹ 6(66), Iyun'. S. 756-765.

References (transliteration):
Mamchur E.A. Ob'ektivnost' nauki i relyativizm (K diskussiyam v sovremennoy epistemologii). M., 2004. S. 64.
Craig W.L. Time and eternity: Exploring God’s Relationship to Time. Crossway, Wheaton, Illinois, 2001.
Callender C. Time’s Ontic Voltage // The Future of the Philosophy of Time / edited by Adrian Bardon. Routeledge, N.Y., L., 2012. P. 73-98.
Schurz G. Philosophy of Science: a Unified Approach. Routledge. N.Y., L., 2014.
McTaggart J.M.E. The Unreality of Time // The Philosophy of Time. Oxford University Press, 1993. P. 23-34.
Zima V.N. Problema temporal'nosti i sposobov ee predstavleniya v filosofii estestvennykh nauk // Filosofskie nauki, 2013. ¹ 5. S. 99-111.
Dyke H. On Methodology in the Metaphysics of Time // The Future of the Philosophy of Time / edited by Adrian Bardon. Routeledge, N.Y., L., 2012. P. 169-217.
Le Poidevin R., MacBeath. Introduction // The Philosophy of Time. Oxford University Press, 1993. P. 1-20.
Zima V.N. Parmenid i staticheskaya kontseptsiya vremeni // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2013. ¹ 6(66), Iyun'. S. 756-765.

Abstract: In his research Ursul describes peculiarities of the future and makes a proposal about possible researches of this phenomenon which does not yet exist. The author views the turn towards the future in different activities as the futurization process. The researcher also discusses the principle of temporal integrity that acts as some kind of the 'time conservation law' and reflects the need for taking into account the relationship and quantitative parameters of the three worlds of time (the past, the present and the future). From the point of view of the principle of temporal integrity the futurization process of human activity means improving the temporal strategy of such activity. The anticipation phenomenon is aligned with accelerated futurization including anticipatory reflection and development. It is underlined that global catastrophes can be prevented only as a result of anticipatory decisions and actions which significantly boosts up interest in researching the future. The researcher has mostly used futurological prognosis, noospheric and other methodological approaches to researching the future as well as synergetic, probabilistic, evolutionary historical and interdisciplinary approaches, principles of temporal integrity, globalism and cosmoglobalism. According to the author, there are spontaneous futurization and deliberate futurization, the latter being related to the definition of futurization as an intentional activity feature, which is illustrated by the transition towards sustainable development and noospherogenesis. Special attention is paid to the types of futurization as anticipatory activities and anticipatory development, which increases interest in futurology, prognosis, foresight and other researches of the future. The author demonstrates that the movement of time from the past to the future through the present called 'the arrow of time' is conditioned by the inflation phase of the Big Bang, the 'birth' of the Universe and further expansion thereof. It is underlined that the inflation period demonstrated the super-fast and therefore anticipatory futurization. Noteworthy that there are new arguments proving this hypothesis today.

Keywords: sustainable development, forecasting, arrow of time, worlds of time, futurization, inflationary futurization, future, temporal integrity, anticipatory reflection, research of future

References:
Ursul A.D. Na puti k noosfernoy tsivilizatsii: vzaimosvyaz' tsivilizatsionnykh i noosfernykh issledovaniy // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2014. - 12. - C. 1501 - 1520. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.12.13546.
A.D. Ursul Protsess futurizatsii i stanovlenie operezhayushchego obrazovaniya // Pedagogika i prosveshchenie.-2012.-2.-C. 20-33.
Barker Dzh. Operezhayushchee myshlenie: Kak uvidet' novyy trend ran'she drugikh / Per.s angl. – M.: Al'pina Pablisher, 2014.
Shpengler O. Zakat Evropy. Ocherki morfologii mirovoy istorii. T.1. – M.: Ayris-Press.2006.
Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A. Perspektivy noosferogeneza. Metodologiya noosfernykh issledovaniy. – Saarbrücken: LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 2015.
Yaspers K. Smysl i naznachenie istorii. – M.: Politizdat. 1994.
Vernadskiy V.I. Filosofskie mysli naturalista. – M.: Nauka. 1988.
Khaydegger M. Bytie i vremya / Per. s nem. V.V. Bibikhina. – Khar'kov: Folio, 2003.
Lisichkin V. A. Prognoz kak informatsiya iz budushchego // Problemy obshchey i sotsial'noy prognostiki. – M., 1968. – Vyp. 1.
Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A. Nauka i obrazovanie v global'no-noosfernoy perspektive // Sotsiodinamika.-2013.-2.-C. 161-222. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7144.2013.2.439. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_439.html
Moiseev N.N. Byt' ili ne byt' chelovechestvu? – M.: Ul'yanovskiy Dom pechati, 1999.
Linde A. Inflyatsiya, kvantovaya kosmologiya i antropnyy printsip (2002 g.) // URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0211048v2.
Ursul A.D. Priroda bezopasnosti // Bezopasnost' Evrazii. – 2008. – ¹ 1.
Ursul A.D. Protsess futurizatsii i operezhayushchee otrazhenie // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2012. – ¹9.
Il'in I.V., Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A. Global'nyy evolyutsionizm: Idei, problemy, gipotezy. – M.: Moskovskiy universitet, 2012.
Ursul A.D. Operezhayushchee obrazovanie. Ot modernizatsii k futurizatsii. – Saarbrücken: Dictus Publishing, 2015.
Anokhin P.K. Operezhayushchee otrazhenie deystvitel'nosti / Izbrannye trudy. Filosofskie aspekty teorii funktsional'noy sistemy. – M.: Nauka, 1978.
Chernin A.D. Kosmologiya: Bol'shoy Vzryv. – Fryazino: : Vek 2. 2005.
Ekzistentsial'nye riski // URL: http://deadland.ru/node/14277.
Cherepashchuk A.M. Chernye dyry vo Vselennoy. – Fryazino: Vek 2. 2005.
Budushchee, kotorogo my khotim // URL:http://www.un.org/ru/sustainablefuture.
Rozin V.M. Budushchee v usloviyakh smeny i neopredelennosti real'nosti // Filosofskaya mysl'.-2013.-8.-C. 248-294. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8728.2013.8.669. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_669.html
Prognozirovanie budushchego: novaya paradigma / Pod red. G.G. Fetisova, V.M. Bondarenko. – M., 2008.
Oyzerman T.I. Vozmozhno li predvidenie otdalennogo budushchego? // Vestnik RAN. – 2005. – T. 75. – ¹ 8.
Gegel' G.V.F. Filosofiya istorii. – L.: Sotsekgiz, 1935. – T. 8.
Ursul A.D. Futurizatsiya kak temporal'nyy fenomen // Filosofskaya mysl'. – 2013. – ¹ 7.

References (transliteration):
Ursul A.D. Na puti k noosfernoy tsivilizatsii: vzaimosvyaz' tsivilizatsionnykh i noosfernykh issledovaniy // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2014. - 12. - C. 1501 - 1520. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.12.13546.
A.D. Ursul Protsess futurizatsii i stanovlenie operezhayushchego obrazovaniya // Pedagogika i prosveshchenie.-2012.-2.-C. 20-33.
Barker Dzh. Operezhayushchee myshlenie: Kak uvidet' novyy trend ran'she drugikh / Per.s angl. – M.: Al'pina Pablisher, 2014.
Shpengler O. Zakat Evropy. Ocherki morfologii mirovoy istorii. T.1. – M.: Ayris-Press.2006.
Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A. Perspektivy noosferogeneza. Metodologiya noosfernykh issledovaniy. – Saarbrücken: LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 2015.
Yaspers K. Smysl i naznachenie istorii. – M.: Politizdat. 1994.
Vernadskiy V.I. Filosofskie mysli naturalista. – M.: Nauka. 1988.
Khaydegger M. Bytie i vremya / Per. s nem. V.V. Bibikhina. – Khar'kov: Folio, 2003.
Lisichkin V. A. Prognoz kak informatsiya iz budushchego // Problemy obshchey i sotsial'noy prognostiki. – M., 1968. – Vyp. 1.
Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A. Nauka i obrazovanie v global'no-noosfernoy perspektive // Sotsiodinamika.-2013.-2.-C. 161-222. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7144.2013.2.439. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_439.html
Moiseev N.N. Byt' ili ne byt' chelovechestvu? – M.: Ul'yanovskiy Dom pechati, 1999.
Linde A. Inflyatsiya, kvantovaya kosmologiya i antropnyy printsip (2002 g.) // URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0211048v2.
Ursul A.D. Priroda bezopasnosti // Bezopasnost' Evrazii. – 2008. – ¹ 1.
Ursul A.D. Protsess futurizatsii i operezhayushchee otrazhenie // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2012. – ¹9.
Il'in I.V., Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A. Global'nyy evolyutsionizm: Idei, problemy, gipotezy. – M.: Moskovskiy universitet, 2012.
Ursul A.D. Operezhayushchee obrazovanie. Ot modernizatsii k futurizatsii. – Saarbrücken: Dictus Publishing, 2015.
Anokhin P.K. Operezhayushchee otrazhenie deystvitel'nosti / Izbrannye trudy. Filosofskie aspekty teorii funktsional'noy sistemy. – M.: Nauka, 1978.
Chernin A.D. Kosmologiya: Bol'shoy Vzryv. – Fryazino: : Vek 2. 2005.
Ekzistentsial'nye riski // URL: http://deadland.ru/node/14277.
Cherepashchuk A.M. Chernye dyry vo Vselennoy. – Fryazino: Vek 2. 2005.
Budushchee, kotorogo my khotim // URL:http://www.un.org/ru/sustainablefuture.
Rozin V.M. Budushchee v usloviyakh smeny i neopredelennosti real'nosti // Filosofskaya mysl'.-2013.-8.-C. 248-294. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8728.2013.8.669. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_669.html
Prognozirovanie budushchego: novaya paradigma / Pod red. G.G. Fetisova, V.M. Bondarenko. – M., 2008.
Oyzerman T.I. Vozmozhno li predvidenie otdalennogo budushchego? // Vestnik RAN. – 2005. – T. 75. – ¹ 8.
Gegel' G.V.F. Filosofiya istorii. – L.: Sotsekgiz, 1935. – T. 8.
Ursul A.D. Futurizatsiya kak temporal'nyy fenomen // Filosofskaya mysl'. – 2013. – ¹ 7.

Abstract: The article is devoted to the present condition, prospects and problem situations with regard to philosophical, social and humanitarian aspects of scientific research of cosmos and cosmic studies (cosmonautics). In his article Mapelman analyzes how the concept of cosmos and cosmonautics have been developing within the framework of history of science and history of philosophy. Mapelman also shares evaluations of contemporary researches of philosophical issues of cosmos and cosmonautics. The author provides a description of the philosophical issues of cosmonautics that are being solved witin the framework of the Readings devoted to the scientific heritage and development of Konstantin Tsiolkovsky's ideas. To achieve the research objectives, Mapelman uses the methods of systematization, critical analysis, comparison, text reconstruction, historical explanation, etc. The author outlines the following philosophical issues that were first discovered during the Readings: whether 'cosmic philosophy' can be actually developed; Russian cosmism, branches and philosophers; improvement of the contemporary picture of the world taking into account the cosmic scale of such improvement; anthropic principle, the place and role of the principle in cosmic philosophy; global issues of the humankind in terms of the cosmic perspective of social development; cosmic civilization, features and possibilities for existence; the problem of immortality, life and death in the Universe; cosmic ethics and moral principles of cosmonautics; axiological aspect of cosmic activity and transformations; the need to explore the cosmic space; influence of the political, military, social, economic and ideological factors on the development of national cosmic programs; research of social and philosophical issues of extra-terrestrial civilizations and the future of our own civilization. 

Keywords: cosmos, cosmonautics, philosophical research, history of science, cosmic philosophy, Russian cosmism, Konstantin Tsiolkovsky, socio-humanitarian issues, humanitarian expertise, futurology (futures studies)

References:
Tsiolkovskiy K.E. Evangelie ot Kupaly. M.: Luch, 2003. 256 s.
Tsiolkovskiy K.E. Grezy o zemle i nebe. Nauchno-fantasticheskie proizvedeniya. Tula: Priokskoe izd-vo, 1986. 448 s.
Solomatin V.A. Istoriya nauki. M.: PER SE, 2003. 352 s.
Sadikova O.G. Eticheskie idei v estestvennonauchnoy vetvi russkogo kosmizma: N.A. Umov, K.E. Tsiolkovskiy, V.I. Vernadskiy, A.L. Chizhevskiy, N.G. Kholodnyy. Avtoref. dis. kand. filos. nauk. M.: 2013. 32 s.
Lebedev S.A., Rubochkin V.A. Istoriya nauki. M.: MPSI, 2011, 352 s
Russkiy kosmizm: Antologiya filosofskoy mysli. M.: Pedagogika-Press, 1993. 368 s.
Nadezhdin N.Ya. Istoriya nauki i tekhniki. Rostov n/D: Feniks, 2006. 621 s.
Mapel'man V.M. Filosofsko-nravstvennye aspekty kosmicheskogo budushchego chelovechestva (v russkoy filosofskoy traditsii). Palmarium Academic Publishing, 2013. 328 p.
Lebedev S.A., Il'in V.V., Lazarev F.V., Leskov L.V. Vvedenie v istoriyu i filosofiyu nauki. M.: Akademicheskiy Proekt, 2007. 384 s.
Krichevskiy S.V. Ekologicheskaya istoriya tekhniki. M.: IIET RRAN, 2007. 160 s.
Krichevskiy S.V. Aerokosmicheskaya deyatel'nost'. M.: LIBROKOM, 2013. 368 s.
Kosmos v fokuse politiki, ekonomiki, kul'tury. M.: Eksprint, 2002. 235 s.
Kirillin V.A. Stranitsy istorii nauki i tekhniki. M.: Nauka, 1994. 350 s.
Kornev S.V. Uchenie Platona o vozniknovenii mira // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2012. ¹ 1. C. 6-22.
Istoriya i filosofiya nauki. M.: RAGS, 2005. 434 s.
Ivanova L.V., Krichevskiy S.V. Soobshchestvo kosmonavtov. M.: LENAND, 2013, 200 s.
ZhdanovV.L. K voprosu o stanovlenii russkogo kosmizma // Pravo i politika. 2013. ¹ 2. C. 260-265. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.02.15.
Dyatchin N.I. Istoriya razvitiya tekhniki. Rostov n/D: Feniks, 2001. 320 s.
C. 917-933. 5. Globalistika: Entsiklopediya. M.: Raduga, 2003. 1328 s.
Voronina A.S. Komitet OON po kosmosu na sovremennom etape: dostizheniya, problemy, vyzovy // Pravo i politika. 2012. ¹
Voronin A.A. Gumanitarnaya ekspertiza (obzor) // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2012. ¹ 5. C. 118-127.
Budushchee Vselennoy i budushchee nashey tsivilizatsii. M.: Kudesniki, 2002. 354 s.
Bryukhanov V.A. O filosofskoy osnove nauchno-tekhnicheskogo tvorchestva K.E. Tsiolkovskogo. Avtoref. dis. kand. filos. nauk. L.: 1954. 18 s.
Tsiolkovskiy K.E. Kosmicheskaya filosofiya. M.: Editorial URSS, 2001. 480 s.
Tsiolkovskiy K.E. Mirazhi budushchego obshchestvennogo ustroystva. M.: Samoobrazovanie, 2006. 352 s.
Tsiolkovskiy K.E. Ocherki o Vselennoy. Kaluga: Zolotaya alleya. 2001. 384 s.
Tsiolkovskiy K.E. Shchit nauchnoy very. M.: Samoobrazovanie, 2007. 720 s.
Shamov S.A. Filosofskie vzglyady K.E. Tsiolkovskogo. Avtoref. dis. kand. filos. nauk. M.: 1965. 16 s.

References (transliteration):
Tsiolkovskiy K.E. Evangelie ot Kupaly. M.: Luch, 2003. 256 s.
Tsiolkovskiy K.E. Grezy o zemle i nebe. Nauchno-fantasticheskie proizvedeniya. Tula: Priokskoe izd-vo, 1986. 448 s.
Solomatin V.A. Istoriya nauki. M.: PER SE, 2003. 352 s.
Sadikova O.G. Eticheskie idei v estestvennonauchnoy vetvi russkogo kosmizma: N.A. Umov, K.E. Tsiolkovskiy, V.I. Vernadskiy, A.L. Chizhevskiy, N.G. Kholodnyy. Avtoref. dis. kand. filos. nauk. M.: 2013. 32 s.
Lebedev S.A., Rubochkin V.A. Istoriya nauki. M.: MPSI, 2011, 352 s
Russkiy kosmizm: Antologiya filosofskoy mysli. M.: Pedagogika-Press, 1993. 368 s.
Nadezhdin N.Ya. Istoriya nauki i tekhniki. Rostov n/D: Feniks, 2006. 621 s.
Mapel'man V.M. Filosofsko-nravstvennye aspekty kosmicheskogo budushchego chelovechestva (v russkoy filosofskoy traditsii). Palmarium Academic Publishing, 2013. 328 p.
Lebedev S.A., Il'in V.V., Lazarev F.V., Leskov L.V. Vvedenie v istoriyu i filosofiyu nauki. M.: Akademicheskiy Proekt, 2007. 384 s.
Krichevskiy S.V. Ekologicheskaya istoriya tekhniki. M.: IIET RRAN, 2007. 160 s.
Krichevskiy S.V. Aerokosmicheskaya deyatel'nost'. M.: LIBROKOM, 2013. 368 s.
Kosmos v fokuse politiki, ekonomiki, kul'tury. M.: Eksprint, 2002. 235 s.
Kirillin V.A. Stranitsy istorii nauki i tekhniki. M.: Nauka, 1994. 350 s.
Kornev S.V. Uchenie Platona o vozniknovenii mira // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2012. ¹ 1. C. 6-22.
Istoriya i filosofiya nauki. M.: RAGS, 2005. 434 s.
Ivanova L.V., Krichevskiy S.V. Soobshchestvo kosmonavtov. M.: LENAND, 2013, 200 s.
ZhdanovV.L. K voprosu o stanovlenii russkogo kosmizma // Pravo i politika. 2013. ¹ 2. C. 260-265. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.02.15.
Dyatchin N.I. Istoriya razvitiya tekhniki. Rostov n/D: Feniks, 2001. 320 s.
C. 917-933. 5. Globalistika: Entsiklopediya. M.: Raduga, 2003. 1328 s.
Voronina A.S. Komitet OON po kosmosu na sovremennom etape: dostizheniya, problemy, vyzovy // Pravo i politika. 2012. ¹
Voronin A.A. Gumanitarnaya ekspertiza (obzor) // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2012. ¹ 5. C. 118-127.
Budushchee Vselennoy i budushchee nashey tsivilizatsii. M.: Kudesniki, 2002. 354 s.
Bryukhanov V.A. O filosofskoy osnove nauchno-tekhnicheskogo tvorchestva K.E. Tsiolkovskogo. Avtoref. dis. kand. filos. nauk. L.: 1954. 18 s.
Tsiolkovskiy K.E. Kosmicheskaya filosofiya. M.: Editorial URSS, 2001. 480 s.
Tsiolkovskiy K.E. Mirazhi budushchego obshchestvennogo ustroystva. M.: Samoobrazovanie, 2006. 352 s.
Tsiolkovskiy K.E. Ocherki o Vselennoy. Kaluga: Zolotaya alleya. 2001. 384 s.
Tsiolkovskiy K.E. Shchit nauchnoy very. M.: Samoobrazovanie, 2007. 720 s.
Shamov S.A. Filosofskie vzglyady K.E. Tsiolkovskogo. Avtoref. dis. kand. filos. nauk. M.: 1965. 16 s.

Abstract: The subject under review is a temporary form of a piece of cinematographic art. Artistic time continuum is viewed as the subject of synthesis and work material for creating a film. The author of the article makes a conclusion about the need to include the circular time into the pattern of the plot that has the conflict driving its internal development and goes through the thee stage – the exposition, development of the storyline through conflict to the climax and the falling action (resolution of the conflict). The authors shows that the circular time dominating in the plot creates a generalization which is very close to what a mythological consciousness deals with when particular sensual experience is tuned into a sign. The concept of the artistic time continuum is based on the ideas of Saint Augustine and Pavel Florensky. For the first time in the theory of cinematograph the artistic time is viewed as the subject of synthesis and working material for creating a piece of cinematographic art. The author of the article describes the importance of the circular time continuum for the plot. The circular time continuum creates the general outline of the storyline. Cyclicity is viewed as a result of existential issues being solved by human. Description of the role of the circular time in the structure of a piece of cinematographic art has allowed to view the terms ‘peripeteia’ and ‘plot pattern’ differently.

Keywords: artistic time continuum, circular time, theory of dramatic art, plot, plot pattern, peripeteia, piece of cinematographic art, eternity, non-linear time, dynamic process.

Contact information: Marievskaya Natalya Evgenievna, 129226, Russia, Moscow, Wilhelm Pieck str. 3.

References:
Rozin V.M. Metamorfozy i struktura ponyatiya «prostranstvo» // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2013.-6.-C. 68-95. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.6.411. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_411.html.
Berezina T.N. Veroyatnostnye predstavleniya vremeni // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2013.-11.-C. 50-80. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.11.9096. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_9096.html
Khanolaynen D.P. Estetika vosproizvodimogo v sovremennom iskusstve // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2013.-11.-C. 1598-1606. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.11.9658.
V.N. Zima Parmenid i staticheskaya kontseptsiya vremeni // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2013.-6.-C. 756-765. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.6.8058.
Kofman A.F. Khudozhestvennoe prostranstvo i vremya v dramakh Chekhova "Chayka", "Tri sestry", "Vishnevyy sad". // Kul'tura i iskusstvo.-2013.-5.-C. 516-524. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2013.5.9350.
Po E. A. «Evrika». Seriya: Antologiya mudrosti, M: Eksmo, 2008. S. 11.
Rudnev V. P. Vvedenie v shizoreal'nost'. M. : Agraf, 2011. S.182.
Shklovskiy V. B. Svyaz' priemov syuzhetoslozheniya s obshchimi priemami stildya // V. B. O teorii prozy. M.,1983. S. 26
Pantin V. I. Tsiklichnosti teorii. Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya: V 4 t./ In-t filosofii RAN, Nauchno-red. sovet: preds. V.S. Stepin, M: Mysl'. 2010. S. 335.
Makki R. Istoriya na million dollarov. Master klass dlya stsenaristov, pisateley i ne tol'ko / Per s angl. M.: Al'pina non-fikshn. 2008. S. 322.
Pavlenko A. N. Kosmos. Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya: V 4 t./ In-t filosofii RAN, Nauchno-red. sovet: preds. V.S. Stepin, M: Mysl'. 2010. S. 315.
Indik U. Psikhologiya dlya stsenaristov: Postroenie konflikta v syuzhete / Uil'm Indik; Per s angl. – M. : Al'pina non-fikshn, 2014. S.225-238.
Berdyaev N. A. tsit. Po kn. V kn. Russkaya istoriosofiya. Antologiya. M.: ROSPEN. 2006. S. 416.
Vyshegorodtseva O. V. Otritsanie otritsaniya. // Novaya Filosofskaya entsiklopediya:. V 4t./It-t filosofii RAN, Nats. obshch.-naun. fond; Nauchn. red. sovet: preds. V.S. Stepin. – M.: Mysl', 2010. S. 180.
Aristotel'. Poetika. Ritorika / Per. s dr. – grech. V Appel'rota. P. Platonovoy. SPb.:Izdatel'skiy dom
«Azbuka-Klassika», 2008. S.38.
Andreev I.L.. MOZG, VREMYa, VLAST': evolyutsiya virtual'noy real'nosti v real'nuyu virtual'nost'. // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika.-2013.-¹ 12.-C. 1178-1190. DOI: .10.7256/2070-8955.2013.12.10051.
V.M. Rozin. Ponyatie «prostranstvo» v prostranstve kul'tury i nauki. // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2013.-¹ 8.-C. 1164-1173. DOI: .10.7256/1999-2793.2013.8.8567.
V. P. Rudnev. K probleme semiotiki «zerkala»: vozdeystvie i strannye ob'ekty v kinematografe. // Kul'tura i iskusstvo.-2013.-¹ 3.-C. 247-254. DOI: .10.7256/2222-1956.2013.03.1.
S.S. Sevast'yanova. Vremya i prostranstvo v ekranom muzykal'nom teatre. // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2013.-¹ 2.-C. 197-209. DOI: .10.7256/1999-2793.2013.02.7.
M.A. Solonenko. Mnogourovnevyy temporal'nyy mir i mnogoobrazie sposobov vospriyatiya vremeni (Kognitivno-evolyutsionnyy podkhod k vospriyatiyu vremeni v tvorchestve). // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2012.-¹ 11.-C. 98-108.
M.S. Morkin. Metafizika vremeni v zhizni soznaniya. // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2012.-¹ 1.-C. 30-37.

References (transliteration):
Rozin V.M. Metamorfozy i struktura ponyatiya «prostranstvo» // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2013.-6.-C. 68-95. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.6.411. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_411.html.
Berezina T.N. Veroyatnostnye predstavleniya vremeni // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2013.-11.-C. 50-80. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.11.9096. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_9096.html
Khanolaynen D.P. Estetika vosproizvodimogo v sovremennom iskusstve // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2013.-11.-C. 1598-1606. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.11.9658.
V.N. Zima Parmenid i staticheskaya kontseptsiya vremeni // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2013.-6.-C. 756-765. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.6.8058.
Kofman A.F. Khudozhestvennoe prostranstvo i vremya v dramakh Chekhova "Chayka", "Tri sestry", "Vishnevyy sad". // Kul'tura i iskusstvo.-2013.-5.-C. 516-524. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2013.5.9350.
Po E. A. «Evrika». Seriya: Antologiya mudrosti, M: Eksmo, 2008. S. 11.
Rudnev V. P. Vvedenie v shizoreal'nost'. M. : Agraf, 2011. S.182.
Shklovskiy V. B. Svyaz' priemov syuzhetoslozheniya s obshchimi priemami stildya // V. B. O teorii prozy. M.,1983. S. 26
Pantin V. I. Tsiklichnosti teorii. Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya: V 4 t./ In-t filosofii RAN, Nauchno-red. sovet: preds. V.S. Stepin, M: Mysl'. 2010. S. 335.
Makki R. Istoriya na million dollarov. Master klass dlya stsenaristov, pisateley i ne tol'ko / Per s angl. M.: Al'pina non-fikshn. 2008. S. 322.
Pavlenko A. N. Kosmos. Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya: V 4 t./ In-t filosofii RAN, Nauchno-red. sovet: preds. V.S. Stepin, M: Mysl'. 2010. S. 315.
Indik U. Psikhologiya dlya stsenaristov: Postroenie konflikta v syuzhete / Uil'm Indik; Per s angl. – M. : Al'pina non-fikshn, 2014. S.225-238.
Berdyaev N. A. tsit. Po kn. V kn. Russkaya istoriosofiya. Antologiya. M.: ROSPEN. 2006. S. 416.
Vyshegorodtseva O. V. Otritsanie otritsaniya. // Novaya Filosofskaya entsiklopediya:. V 4t./It-t filosofii RAN, Nats. obshch.-naun. fond; Nauchn. red. sovet: preds. V.S. Stepin. – M.: Mysl', 2010. S. 180.
Aristotel'. Poetika. Ritorika / Per. s dr. – grech. V Appel'rota. P. Platonovoy. SPb.:Izdatel'skiy dom
«Azbuka-Klassika», 2008. S.38.
Andreev I.L.. MOZG, VREMYa, VLAST': evolyutsiya virtual'noy real'nosti v real'nuyu virtual'nost'. // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika.-2013.-¹ 12.-C. 1178-1190. DOI: .10.7256/2070-8955.2013.12.10051.
V.M. Rozin. Ponyatie «prostranstvo» v prostranstve kul'tury i nauki. // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2013.-¹ 8.-C. 1164-1173. DOI: .10.7256/1999-2793.2013.8.8567.
V. P. Rudnev. K probleme semiotiki «zerkala»: vozdeystvie i strannye ob'ekty v kinematografe. // Kul'tura i iskusstvo.-2013.-¹ 3.-C. 247-254. DOI: .10.7256/2222-1956.2013.03.1.
S.S. Sevast'yanova. Vremya i prostranstvo v ekranom muzykal'nom teatre. // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2013.-¹ 2.-C. 197-209. DOI: .10.7256/1999-2793.2013.02.7.
M.A. Solonenko. Mnogourovnevyy temporal'nyy mir i mnogoobrazie sposobov vospriyatiya vremeni (Kognitivno-evolyutsionnyy podkhod k vospriyatiyu vremeni v tvorchestve). // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2012.-¹ 11.-C. 98-108.
M.S. Morkin. Metafizika vremeni v zhizni soznaniya. // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2012.-¹ 1.-C. 30-37.

Abstract: The subject matter of the research presented in this article is the flow of time as the transition of events from the future to the past via the present. Time has both static and dynamic aspects. The flow of time is the dynamic side of time. Metaphorically, the flow of time can be presented as the change of events in the present and their gradual movement to the past. Philosophicalresearchofthisphenomenonmust not be limited to the description at the metaphorical level. It is highly necessary to understand the essence of the flow of time and offer an approach to the formalized description of this phenomenon. The author of the article offers an approach to studying the flow of time as a contradictory phenomenon. According to the author, many philosophers believed contrariety to be the key characteristic of the flow of time. The author emphasizes the need for researches of the dynamic aspects of the subjective time in order to understand the essence of the flow of time as well as to solve the problem of objectivity of the flow of time. The author describes the main properties of the preset (‘now’). He also concludes that the essence of the flow of time is determined by the contradictions between the two properties of the present, synchronism and duration. The author also formulates the argument of the continued presence and proves that the flow of time has a subjective meaning (it exists only in our minds and therefore the flow of time is not the element of the objective time).

Keywords: flow of time, subjective time, time and consciousness, cognitive frames, temporality, dynamic concept of time, static concept of time, mental presence, perception of time, paraconsistent logic.

Contact information: Yurasov Andrey Alexandrovich, 119991, Russia, Moscow, ul. Volkhonka 14/1, str. 5, komn. 407.

References:
Alyushin A.L., Knyazeva, E.N. Tempomiry. Skorost' vospriyatiya i shkaly vremeni. — M.: LKI, 2008.
Anisov A.M. Vremya i komp'yuter. — M.: Nauka, 1991.
Aristotel'. Politika. Metafizika. Analitika. — M.: Eksmo, 2008.
Blazhennyy Avgustin. Ispoved'. — M.: Eksmo, 2006.
Gaydenko P.P. Vremya. Dlitel'nost'. Vechnost'. — M.: Progress-traditsiya, 2007.
Gegel' G.V.F. Fenomenologiya dukha // G. V. F. Gegel': v 14 t. T. 4 — M.: Izd-vo sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoy lit., 1959.
Gusserl' E. Fenomenologiya vnutrennego soznaniya vremeni. // E. Gusserl': v 3 t. T. 1. — M.: Gnozis, 1994.
Delez Zh. Logika smysla. — M.: Raritet, 1998.
Dosokratiki. Doeleatovskiy i eleatovskiy periody. — Minsk: Kharvest, 1999.
Kant I. Kritika chistogo razuma. — Feniks: Rostov-na-Donu, 1999
Merlo-Ponti M. Fenomenologiya vospriyatiya — SPb.: Nauka, 1999.
Peppel' E. Nastoyashchee: estestvennoe sostoyanie chelovecheskogo razuma // Präsens. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov. — M.: OLMA Media Grupp, 2012.
Sartr Zh.-P. Bytie i nichto. — M.: AST, 2009.
Fragmenty rannikh grecheskikh filosofov / Izd. podgot. Lebedev A.V. — M.: Nauka, 1989.
Khaydegger M. Bytie i vremya. — M.: Akademicheskiy proekt, 2011.
Khaydegger M. Vremya i bytie. — SPb.: Nauka, 2007.
Tsukanov B.I. Vremya v psikhike cheloveka. — Odessa: AstroPrint, 2000.
Yurasov A.A. Iskusstvennyy intellekt i temporal'naya organizatsiya soznaniya // Estestvennyy i iskusstvennyy intellekt. Pod. red. D.I. Dubrovskogo i V.A. Lektorskogo. — M.: Kanon+, 2011.
McTaggart J. M.E. The unreality of time // The philosophy of time. — New York: Oxford University Press Inc, 2009.
Priest G. In contradiction. — Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2010.

References (transliteration):
Alyushin A.L., Knyazeva, E.N. Tempomiry. Skorost' vospriyatiya i shkaly vremeni. — M.: LKI, 2008.
Anisov A.M. Vremya i komp'yuter. — M.: Nauka, 1991.
Aristotel'. Politika. Metafizika. Analitika. — M.: Eksmo, 2008.
Blazhennyy Avgustin. Ispoved'. — M.: Eksmo, 2006.
Gaydenko P.P. Vremya. Dlitel'nost'. Vechnost'. — M.: Progress-traditsiya, 2007.
Gegel' G.V.F. Fenomenologiya dukha // G. V. F. Gegel': v 14 t. T. 4 — M.: Izd-vo sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoy lit., 1959.
Gusserl' E. Fenomenologiya vnutrennego soznaniya vremeni. // E. Gusserl': v 3 t. T. 1. — M.: Gnozis, 1994.
Delez Zh. Logika smysla. — M.: Raritet, 1998.
Dosokratiki. Doeleatovskiy i eleatovskiy periody. — Minsk: Kharvest, 1999.
Kant I. Kritika chistogo razuma. — Feniks: Rostov-na-Donu, 1999
Merlo-Ponti M. Fenomenologiya vospriyatiya — SPb.: Nauka, 1999.
Peppel' E. Nastoyashchee: estestvennoe sostoyanie chelovecheskogo razuma // Präsens. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov. — M.: OLMA Media Grupp, 2012.
Sartr Zh.-P. Bytie i nichto. — M.: AST, 2009.
Fragmenty rannikh grecheskikh filosofov / Izd. podgot. Lebedev A.V. — M.: Nauka, 1989.
Khaydegger M. Bytie i vremya. — M.: Akademicheskiy proekt, 2011.
Khaydegger M. Vremya i bytie. — SPb.: Nauka, 2007.
Tsukanov B.I. Vremya v psikhike cheloveka. — Odessa: AstroPrint, 2000.
Yurasov A.A. Iskusstvennyy intellekt i temporal'naya organizatsiya soznaniya // Estestvennyy i iskusstvennyy intellekt. Pod. red. D.I. Dubrovskogo i V.A. Lektorskogo. — M.: Kanon+, 2011.
McTaggart J. M.E. The unreality of time // The philosophy of time. — New York: Oxford University Press Inc, 2009.
Priest G. In contradiction. — Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2010.

Abstract: The article is devoted to the problems raise by Kat in his ‘mathematical antinomies’. Analysis is carried out in original formulation of Kant’s own terms and as a part of his own philosophical argumentation. The same problems are also viewed disregarding Kant’s philosophy. Validity and evidence which make it possible to structure analysis in a form of rigorous theory as it is seen by modern mathematics, allow to categorically state that Kant’s classification lacks grounds and his reasoning regarding ‘mathematical antinomies’ can’t be considered to be a proof. On the contrary both his theses and antitheses are irrefutable. The essence of problems is not in unavoidable contradictions of mind or process of cognition of transcendental world in the course of Kantian debates of mind with itself but in non-uniqueness of conceptual representations. As for the limited prescribed to a cognizing mind, they involve, in the first place, the laws that determine the architectonics of veritable theories.

Keywords: philosophy, “mathematical antinomies”, Kant, transcendental dialectics, antitetics, space, time, infinity, architectonics of theories, mind.

Contact information: Zholkov Sergey Yurievich, 101000, Russia, Moscow, ul. Myasnitskaya 20.

Abstract: The article describes peculiarities of fundamental historical processes in Russian government. These fundamental processes include colonization, modernization and globalization. The author of the article provides definitions of the mentioned processes and reveal what they mean. The author analyzes these processes in the ‘space-time’, ‘center-periphery’, ‘extensive-intensive’, ‘vertical-horizontal’ coordinates. Special attention is paid t peculiarities of the Russian space and time and the influence of the Russian space-time continuum on fundamental historical transformations. It is stated that there are certain Russian historical (but not only geographical) conditions, circumstances and mechanisms of development of these processes. One of the defining moments here is a frequent appearance of the phenomenon of pseudomorphosis in Russian history. This makes it the method and type of development in Russia and for Russia. Besides that, the author analyzes the influence of an active historical person on how the aforesaid fundamental processes go as well as the role of violence in colonization and modernization projects and forms of opposition to emanation of violence.

Keywords: colonization, modernization, globalization, space, time, center, periphery, extensity, violence, opposition.

Contact information: Korolev Sergey Alekseevich, 119991, Russia, Moscow, ul. Volkhonka 14/1, str. 5, komn. 428.

References:
1. Bauman 3. Globalizatsiya. Posledstviya dlya cheloveka i obshchestva / per. s angl. M.: Ves' mir, 2004.
2. Babakov V.G. Krizisnye etnosy. M.: IF RAN, 1993.
3. Brodel' F. Chto takoe Frantsiya? Kn. 1. Prostranstvo i istoriya. M.: Izd-vo im. Sabashnikovykh, 1994.
4. Bogoraz-Tan V.G. Kratkiy putevoditel' po vystavke «Chukotskoe obshchestvo». L.: Izd-vo Akademii
nauk SSSR, 1934.
5. Virilio P. Informatsionnaya bomba. Strategiya obmana. M.: Gnozis, Pragmatika kul'tury, 2002.
6. Giddens E. Uskol'zayushchiy mir. Kak globalizatsiya menyaet nashu zhizn'. M.: Ves' mir, 2004.
7. Globalizatsiya i stolknovenie identichnostey. Mezhdunarodnaya internet-konferentsiya 24 fevralya —
14 marta 2003. Sb. materialov. M., 2003.
8. Ionin L.G. Sotsiologiya kul'tury. 4-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Izd. dom GU VShE, 2004.
9. Kolonial'naya politika tsarizma na Kamchatke i Chukotke v 18 v. Sb. arkh. mat. / pod red. Ya.P. Al'kora
i A.K. Drezeno. L.: Izd-vo Instituta narodov Severa TsIK SSSR, 1935.
10. Korolev S.A. Beskonechnoe prostranstvo. Geo-i sotsiograficheskie obrazy vlasti v Rossii. M.: IF
RAN, 1997.
11. Korolev S.A. Kraya prostranstva. Rossiyskaya granitsa: genezis i tipologiya // Otechestvennye za-
piski. 2002. ¹ 6.
12. Korolev S.A. Modernizatsiya i demodernizatsiya v rossiyskoy istorii. Chast' I // Filosofiya i kul'-
tura. 2009. ¹ 1.
13. Korolev S.A. Povsednevnost' kak emanatsiya sotsial'nosti: transformatsii i trendy // NB:
Filosofskie issledovaniya. 2013. ¹ 8. (DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.8.709).
14. Korolev S.A. Psevdomorfoza kak tip razvitiya: sluchay Rossii // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2009. ¹ 6.
15. Kotsebu O.E. Novoe puteshestvie vokrug sveta v 1823-1826 gg. Izd. 3-e. M.: Nauka, 1987.
16. Kuzovkov Yu.V. Globalizatsiya i spiral' istorii. M.: Anima-press, 2010.
17. Lyubavskiy M.K. Istoricheskaya geografiya Rossii v svyazi s kolonizatsiey. SPb: Lan', 2000.
18. Marks K. Britanskoe vladychestvo v Indii // Marks K. i Engel's F. Soch. T. 9.
19. Mezhuev V.M. Rossiyskaya modernizatsiya i kul'tura // Filosofskie nauki. 2011. ¹ 1.
20. Menyayushchayasya sotsial'nost': kontury budushchego / otv. red. V.G. Fedotova. M.: IF RAN, 2012.
21. Mnogolikaya globalizatsiya / pod red. P. Bergera i S. Khantingtona. M.: Aspekt Press, 2004.
22. Motroshilova N.V. Tsivilizatsiya i varvarstvo v epokhu global'nykh krizisov. 2-e izd., rasshir. i
ispr. M.: Kanon+, 2010.
23. Nefedkin A.K. Voennoe delo chukchey (seredina XVII — nachalo XX v.). SPb.: Peterburgskoe vostoko-
vedenie, 2003.
24. Pankratova A.M. Vstupitel'naya stat'ya // Rabochee dvizhenie v Rossii v XIX veke. Izd. 2-e, dop. T. I.
1800-1860. Ch. I, 1800-1825. M.: Gospolitizdat, 1955.
25. Podoroga V.A. Fenomen vlasti (beseda s S.A. Korolevym) // Filosofskie nauki. 1993. ¹ 1-3.
26. Pokhlebkin V.V. Tatary i Rus'. 360 let otnosheniy Rusi s tatarskimi gosudarstvami v XIII-XVI vv.
M.: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2001.
27. Rossiyskaya modernizatsiya: problemy i perspektivy («Kruglyy stol») // Voprosy filosofii.
1993. ¹ 7.
28. Utkin A.I. Globalizatsiya: protsess i osmyslenie. M.: Logos, 2001.
29. Fedotova V.G. Edinstvo i mnogoobrazie kul'tur v usloviyakh globalizatsii // Voprosy filosofii.
2011. ¹ 9.
30. Fedotova V.G., Kolpakov V.A., Fedotova N.N. Global'nyy kapitalizm: tri velikie transformatsii.
M.: Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya, 2008.
31. Chumakov A.N. Globalistika v sisteme sovremennogo nauchnogo znaniya // Voprosy filosofii. 2012.
¹ 7.
32. Khantington S. Politicheskiy poryadok v menyayushchikhsya obshchestvakh. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2004.
33. Eydel'man N.Ya. Tvoy vosemnadtsatyy vek. M., 1986.

References (transliteration):
1. Bauman 3. Globalizatsiya. Posledstviya dlya cheloveka i obshchestva / per. s angl. M.: Ves' mir, 2004.
2. Babakov V.G. Krizisnye etnosy. M.: IF RAN, 1993.
3. Brodel' F. Chto takoe Frantsiya? Kn. 1. Prostranstvo i istoriya. M.: Izd-vo im. Sabashnikovykh, 1994.
4. Bogoraz-Tan V.G. Kratkiy putevoditel' po vystavke «Chukotskoe obshchestvo». L.: Izd-vo Akademii
nauk SSSR, 1934.
5. Virilio P. Informatsionnaya bomba. Strategiya obmana. M.: Gnozis, Pragmatika kul'tury, 2002.
6. Giddens E. Uskol'zayushchiy mir. Kak globalizatsiya menyaet nashu zhizn'. M.: Ves' mir, 2004.
7. Globalizatsiya i stolknovenie identichnostey. Mezhdunarodnaya internet-konferentsiya 24 fevralya —
14 marta 2003. Sb. materialov. M., 2003.
8. Ionin L.G. Sotsiologiya kul'tury. 4-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Izd. dom GU VShE, 2004.
9. Kolonial'naya politika tsarizma na Kamchatke i Chukotke v 18 v. Sb. arkh. mat. / pod red. Ya.P. Al'kora
i A.K. Drezeno. L.: Izd-vo Instituta narodov Severa TsIK SSSR, 1935.
10. Korolev S.A. Beskonechnoe prostranstvo. Geo-i sotsiograficheskie obrazy vlasti v Rossii. M.: IF
RAN, 1997.
11. Korolev S.A. Kraya prostranstva. Rossiyskaya granitsa: genezis i tipologiya // Otechestvennye za-
piski. 2002. ¹ 6.
12. Korolev S.A. Modernizatsiya i demodernizatsiya v rossiyskoy istorii. Chast' I // Filosofiya i kul'-
tura. 2009. ¹ 1.
13. Korolev S.A. Povsednevnost' kak emanatsiya sotsial'nosti: transformatsii i trendy // NB:
Filosofskie issledovaniya. 2013. ¹ 8. (DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.8.709).
14. Korolev S.A. Psevdomorfoza kak tip razvitiya: sluchay Rossii // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2009. ¹ 6.
15. Kotsebu O.E. Novoe puteshestvie vokrug sveta v 1823-1826 gg. Izd. 3-e. M.: Nauka, 1987.
16. Kuzovkov Yu.V. Globalizatsiya i spiral' istorii. M.: Anima-press, 2010.
17. Lyubavskiy M.K. Istoricheskaya geografiya Rossii v svyazi s kolonizatsiey. SPb: Lan', 2000.
18. Marks K. Britanskoe vladychestvo v Indii // Marks K. i Engel's F. Soch. T. 9.
19. Mezhuev V.M. Rossiyskaya modernizatsiya i kul'tura // Filosofskie nauki. 2011. ¹ 1.
20. Menyayushchayasya sotsial'nost': kontury budushchego / otv. red. V.G. Fedotova. M.: IF RAN, 2012.
21. Mnogolikaya globalizatsiya / pod red. P. Bergera i S. Khantingtona. M.: Aspekt Press, 2004.
22. Motroshilova N.V. Tsivilizatsiya i varvarstvo v epokhu global'nykh krizisov. 2-e izd., rasshir. i
ispr. M.: Kanon+, 2010.
23. Nefedkin A.K. Voennoe delo chukchey (seredina XVII — nachalo XX v.). SPb.: Peterburgskoe vostoko-
vedenie, 2003.
24. Pankratova A.M. Vstupitel'naya stat'ya // Rabochee dvizhenie v Rossii v XIX veke. Izd. 2-e, dop. T. I.
1800-1860. Ch. I, 1800-1825. M.: Gospolitizdat, 1955.
25. Podoroga V.A. Fenomen vlasti (beseda s S.A. Korolevym) // Filosofskie nauki. 1993. ¹ 1-3.
26. Pokhlebkin V.V. Tatary i Rus'. 360 let otnosheniy Rusi s tatarskimi gosudarstvami v XIII-XVI vv.
M.: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2001.
27. Rossiyskaya modernizatsiya: problemy i perspektivy («Kruglyy stol») // Voprosy filosofii.
1993. ¹ 7.
28. Utkin A.I. Globalizatsiya: protsess i osmyslenie. M.: Logos, 2001.
29. Fedotova V.G. Edinstvo i mnogoobrazie kul'tur v usloviyakh globalizatsii // Voprosy filosofii.
2011. ¹ 9.
30. Fedotova V.G., Kolpakov V.A., Fedotova N.N. Global'nyy kapitalizm: tri velikie transformatsii.
M.: Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya, 2008.
31. Chumakov A.N. Globalistika v sisteme sovremennogo nauchnogo znaniya // Voprosy filosofii. 2012.
¹ 7.
32. Khantington S. Politicheskiy poryadok v menyayushchikhsya obshchestvakh. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2004.
33. Eydel'man N.Ya. Tvoy vosemnadtsatyy vek. M., 1986.

Abstract: The author analyzes the contents of the static concept of time and the main forms of this concept in modern philosophy. The article also studies the relation between the static concept of time and views of the Antique philosopher Parmenides of Elea. The author analyzes opinions of modern researchers who actually admit that there is such a certain relation between them. It is concluded that it is impossible to study Parmenides’ views as any form of the static concept of time. The author shows that it is important to analyze the Parmenides’ approach to being and existence in order to set out the problem of time in philosophy and to solve the problem about ontological circumstances of time objectivation. The author traces back tendencies to solve the question about the relation between time, eternity and plurality in late neo-Platonism and concludes that the solution is that the eternal but not temporal interpretation of this relation prevails. It is concluded the method of presenting time as B-series in modern philosophy (so called static concept of time) allows not only temporary, but also a-temporary and even eternal interpretation. It is pointed out that the main role of alternative interpretations is that they again raise a question about the actual difference between ontology of time and ontology of eternity.

Keywords: philosophy, time, eternity, plurality, temporality, a-temporality, ontology, Parmenides, neo- Platonism.

Contact information: Zima Vadim Nikolaevich, 119991, Russia, Moscow, ul. Malaya Pirogovskaya 1 str. 1.

References:
1. Anisov A.M. O ponyatiyakh napravlennosti i neobratimosti vremeni // Sinergetika vremeni. M.:
Reproniks, 2007. S. 171-195.
2. Anisov A.M. Temporal'nyy universum i ego poznanie. M., 2000. 208 s.
3. Gaydenko P.P. Vremya. Dlitel'nost'. Vechnost'. Problema vremeni v evropeyskoy filosofii i na-
uke. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2006. 464 s.
4. Damaskiy. Kommentariy k «Parmenidu» Platona / Perevod s drevnegrech., stat'ya, primech., ukaza-
teli, spisok literatury L.Yu. Lukomskogo. SPb., 2008. 752 s.
5. Zima V.N. Nekotorye aspekty predstavleniya vechnosti v antichnoy i rannesrednevekovoy filo-
sofii v kontekste sovremennykh problem ontologii i filosofii nauki // Prepodavatel' XXI vek.
2011. ¹ 2. S. 219-230.
6. Zima V.N. Problema ontologicheskogo statusa vremeni v filosofii nauki: analiz osnovnykh trud-
nostey // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2013. ¹ 1 (61). S. 50-59.
7. Zima V.N. Uchenie o vremeni i vechnosti v antichnoy filosofii i patristike (opyt sravnitel'nogo
analiza). M., 2009. 266 s.
8. Molchanov Yu.B. Chetyre kontseptsii vremeni v filosofii i fizike. M.: Nauka, 1977. 192 s.
9. Eynshteyn A., Infel'd L. Evolyutsiya fiziki. Razvitie idey ot pervonachal'nykh ponyatiy do teorii
otnositel'nosti i kvantov // Eynshteyn A. Sobranie nauchnykh trudov v chetyrekh tomakh. T. 4. S. 357-543.
10. Carrol S. From Eternity to Here: the Quest for the Ultimate Theory of Time. Duton, N. Y., 2010. 438 p.
11. Carrol. J.W., Markosian N. An Introduction to Metaphysics. Cambridge University Press, N.Y., 2010. 268 p.
12. Craig W.L. Time and eternity: Exploring God’s Relationship to Time. Crossway, Wheaton, Illinois, 2001.
272 p.
13. Dorato M. On Becoming, Cosmic Time and Rotating Universes // Time, Reality &Experience /edited by
Craig Callender. N.Y., 2002. P. 253-276.
14. Healey R. Can Physics Coherently Deny the Reality of Time? // Time, Reality &Experience /edited by Craig
Callender. N.Y., 2002. P. 293-316.
15. Hoefer C. Freedom from the Inside Out // Time, Reality &Experience / edited by Craig Callender. N.Y.,
2002. P. 201-222.
16. Loux. M.J. Metaphysics: a contemporary introduction / Michael J. Loux. 3rd ed. Routeledge, N.Y., L.,
2009. 309 p.
17. McTaggart J.M.E. The Unreality of Time // Mind. 1908. Vol. 17. P. 457-474.
18. Oaklander L.N. The Ontology of Time. Prometheus Books. N.Y., 2004. 366 p.
19. Price H. Time’s Arrow and Archimedes’ Point. N.Y., 1996. xiii+306 p.
20. Sorabji R. Time, creation and the continuum: theories in antique and the early middle ages. Ithaca (N.Y.),
1983. 473 p.
21. Tooley M. Time, Tense and Causation. Oxford University Press, N.Y., 1997. 424 p.

References (transliteration):
1. Anisov A.M. O ponyatiyakh napravlennosti i neobratimosti vremeni // Sinergetika vremeni. M.:
Reproniks, 2007. S. 171-195.
2. Anisov A.M. Temporal'nyy universum i ego poznanie. M., 2000. 208 s.
3. Gaydenko P.P. Vremya. Dlitel'nost'. Vechnost'. Problema vremeni v evropeyskoy filosofii i na-
uke. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2006. 464 s.
4. Damaskiy. Kommentariy k «Parmenidu» Platona / Perevod s drevnegrech., stat'ya, primech., ukaza-
teli, spisok literatury L.Yu. Lukomskogo. SPb., 2008. 752 s.
5. Zima V.N. Nekotorye aspekty predstavleniya vechnosti v antichnoy i rannesrednevekovoy filo-
sofii v kontekste sovremennykh problem ontologii i filosofii nauki // Prepodavatel' XXI vek.
2011. ¹ 2. S. 219-230.
6. Zima V.N. Problema ontologicheskogo statusa vremeni v filosofii nauki: analiz osnovnykh trud-
nostey // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2013. ¹ 1 (61). S. 50-59.
7. Zima V.N. Uchenie o vremeni i vechnosti v antichnoy filosofii i patristike (opyt sravnitel'nogo
analiza). M., 2009. 266 s.
8. Molchanov Yu.B. Chetyre kontseptsii vremeni v filosofii i fizike. M.: Nauka, 1977. 192 s.
9. Eynshteyn A., Infel'd L. Evolyutsiya fiziki. Razvitie idey ot pervonachal'nykh ponyatiy do teorii
otnositel'nosti i kvantov // Eynshteyn A. Sobranie nauchnykh trudov v chetyrekh tomakh. T. 4. S. 357-543.
10. Carrol S. From Eternity to Here: the Quest for the Ultimate Theory of Time. Duton, N. Y., 2010. 438 p.
11. Carrol. J.W., Markosian N. An Introduction to Metaphysics. Cambridge University Press, N.Y., 2010. 268 p.
12. Craig W.L. Time and eternity: Exploring God’s Relationship to Time. Crossway, Wheaton, Illinois, 2001.
272 p.
13. Dorato M. On Becoming, Cosmic Time and Rotating Universes // Time, Reality &Experience /edited by
Craig Callender. N.Y., 2002. P. 253-276.
14. Healey R. Can Physics Coherently Deny the Reality of Time? // Time, Reality &Experience /edited by Craig
Callender. N.Y., 2002. P. 293-316.
15. Hoefer C. Freedom from the Inside Out // Time, Reality &Experience / edited by Craig Callender. N.Y.,
2002. P. 201-222.
16. Loux. M.J. Metaphysics: a contemporary introduction / Michael J. Loux. 3rd ed. Routeledge, N.Y., L.,
2009. 309 p.
17. McTaggart J.M.E. The Unreality of Time // Mind. 1908. Vol. 17. P. 457-474.
18. Oaklander L.N. The Ontology of Time. Prometheus Books. N.Y., 2004. 366 p.
19. Price H. Time’s Arrow and Archimedes’ Point. N.Y., 1996. xiii+306 p.
20. Sorabji R. Time, creation and the continuum: theories in antique and the early middle ages. Ithaca (N.Y.),
1983. 473 p.
21. Tooley M. Time, Tense and Causation. Oxford University Press, N.Y., 1997. 424 p.

Abstract: Space and time in screen music theatre is viewed as the synthesis of verbal (libretto), musical and graphical presentations of space and time. In screen music theatre space and time follow the main esthetic laws. They appear as conditional, inseparable categories. Space and time continuum is oriented at emotions, however, the reality or metaphor of a chronotopos can be stressed out depending on the genre or a director’s intention. In new conditions music plays are changed and structured according to new cinematographic principles. Stressing out this or that property leads to changing another property, for instance, time stop (emotional time in music) is usually accompanied with changes in the visual imagery, in this case expansion of the emotional space is caused with the narrowing of the visual space (when the image is enlarged). Space and time continuum in music plays has a mosaic pattern and is realized through various metro-rhythmic properties. The relation between space and time creates the audio-visual counterpoint that defines the esthetic phenomenon of screen music theatre.

Keywords: philosophy, time, space, screen, music theatre, convergence of time layers, time parallelism, time stops, author’s and plot’s space, real and conditional space, inner monologue.

Contact information: Sevastianova, S. S., 414000, Russia, Astrakhan, ul. Sovetskaya, 23.

References:
1. Balash B. Kino: Stanovlenie i sushchnost' novogo iskusstva. M.: Progress, 1968. 328 s.
2. Bakhtin M. Problema soderzhaniya, materiala i formy v slovesnom khudozhestvennom tvorchestve // Bakhtin
M. Voprosy literatury i estetiki: Issledovaniya raznykh let. M.: Khud. literatura, 1975. S. 6-71.
3. Bakhtin M. Formy vremeni i khronotopa v romane: Ocherki po istoricheskoy poetike // Bakhtin M.
Literaturno-kriticheskie stat'i. M.: Khud. literatura, 1986. S. 121-290.
4. Vernadskiy V. Vremya: Iz letopisnogo naslediya V. Vernadskogo // Voprosy filosofii. 1966.
¹ 12. S. 101-113.
5. Gromov N. Osnovnye modeli stsenicheskogo prostranstva spektaklya: Lestnitsa i arochnye konstruktsii //
Prostranstvo i vremya v iskusstve / Red. E. Khvalenskaya. L.: LGITMiK, 1988. S. 151-168.
6. Zobov R., Mostepanenko A. O tipologii prostranstvenno-vremennykh otnosheniy v sfere iskusstva //
Ritm, prostranstvo i vremya v literature i iskusstve / Red. B. Egorov. L.: Nauka, 1974. S. 11-25.
7. Kagan M. Prostranstvo i vremya kak problema esteticheskoy nauki // Ritm, prostranstvo i vremya v
literature i iskusstve / Red. B. Egorov. L.: Nauka, 1974. S. 26-38.
8. Kazantseva L. Osnovy teorii muzykal'nogo soderzhaniya. Astrakhan': IPTs «Fakel» OOO Astrakhan'-
gazprom, 2001. 368 s.
9. Lissa Z. Estetika kinomuzyki. M.: Muzyka. 1970. 495 s.
10. Likhachev D. Poetika drevnerusskoy literatury // Likhachev D. Izbr. raboty: v 3 t. L.: Khud. litera-
tura, 1987. T. 1. S. 261-654.
11. Martynov V. Vremya i prostranstvo kak faktory muzykal'nogo formoobrazovaniya // Ritm, pro-
stranstvo i vremya v literature i iskusstve / Red. B. Egorov. L.: Nauka, 1974. S. 238-247.
12. Motyleva T. O vremeni i prostranstve v sovremennom zarubezhnom romane // Ritm, prostranstvo i
vremya v literature i iskusstve / Red. B. Egorov. L.: Nauka, 1974. S. 186-199.
13. Nazaykinskiy E. O psikhologii muzykal'nogo vospriyatiya. M.: Muzyka, 1972. 383 s.
14. Orlov G. Vremya i prostranstvo muzyki // Problemy muzykal'noy nauki / Red. G. Orlov, M. Tara-
kanov i dr. M.: Sov. kompozitor, 1972. Vyp. 2. S. 258-394.
15. Pokrovskiy B. Razmyshleniya ob opere: Kn. dlya uchashchikhsya. M.: Prosveshchenie, 1979. 192 s.
16. Polyakova L. «Evgeniy Onegin» na ekrane (o fil'me-opere) // Sov. muzyka. 1959. ¹ 6. S. 119.
17. Pritykina O. Muzykal'noe vremya. Ego kontseptual'nost', struktura, metody issledovaniya: Avtoref.
dis. … kand. iskusstvovedeniya. L., 1986. 19 s.
18. Rud' I., Tsukkerman I. O prostranstvenno-vremennykh preobrazovaniyakh v iskusstve // Ritm, pro-
stranstvo i vremya v literature i iskusstve / Otv. red. B. Egorov. L.: Nauka, 1974. S. 262-273.
19. Saparov M. Ob organizatsii prostranstvenno-vremennogo kontinuuma khudozhestvennogo proizve-
deniya // Ritm, prostranstvo i vremya v literature i iskusstve / Otv. red. B. Egorov. L.: Nauka, 1974.
S. 85-103.
20. Edkind M. O diapazone prostranstvenno-vremennykh otnosheniy v iskusstve oformleniya stseny: Opyt
analiza tvorcheskogo naslediya sovetskoy teatral'noy dekoratsii // Ritm, prostranstvo i vremya / Otv.
red. B. Egorov. L.: Nauka, 1974. S. 209-219.
21. Eynshteyn A. Sushchnost' teorii otnositel'nosti / Per. s angl. Izd. 4-e. M.: Inostr. literatura,
1955. 160 s.

References (transliteration):
1. Balash B. Kino: Stanovlenie i sushchnost' novogo iskusstva. M.: Progress, 1968. 328 s.
2. Bakhtin M. Problema soderzhaniya, materiala i formy v slovesnom khudozhestvennom tvorchestve // Bakhtin
M. Voprosy literatury i estetiki: Issledovaniya raznykh let. M.: Khud. literatura, 1975. S. 6-71.
3. Bakhtin M. Formy vremeni i khronotopa v romane: Ocherki po istoricheskoy poetike // Bakhtin M.
Literaturno-kriticheskie stat'i. M.: Khud. literatura, 1986. S. 121-290.
4. Vernadskiy V. Vremya: Iz letopisnogo naslediya V. Vernadskogo // Voprosy filosofii. 1966.
¹ 12. S. 101-113.
5. Gromov N. Osnovnye modeli stsenicheskogo prostranstva spektaklya: Lestnitsa i arochnye konstruktsii //
Prostranstvo i vremya v iskusstve / Red. E. Khvalenskaya. L.: LGITMiK, 1988. S. 151-168.
6. Zobov R., Mostepanenko A. O tipologii prostranstvenno-vremennykh otnosheniy v sfere iskusstva //
Ritm, prostranstvo i vremya v literature i iskusstve / Red. B. Egorov. L.: Nauka, 1974. S. 11-25.
7. Kagan M. Prostranstvo i vremya kak problema esteticheskoy nauki // Ritm, prostranstvo i vremya v
literature i iskusstve / Red. B. Egorov. L.: Nauka, 1974. S. 26-38.
8. Kazantseva L. Osnovy teorii muzykal'nogo soderzhaniya. Astrakhan': IPTs «Fakel» OOO Astrakhan'-
gazprom, 2001. 368 s.
9. Lissa Z. Estetika kinomuzyki. M.: Muzyka. 1970. 495 s.
10. Likhachev D. Poetika drevnerusskoy literatury // Likhachev D. Izbr. raboty: v 3 t. L.: Khud. litera-
tura, 1987. T. 1. S. 261-654.
11. Martynov V. Vremya i prostranstvo kak faktory muzykal'nogo formoobrazovaniya // Ritm, pro-
stranstvo i vremya v literature i iskusstve / Red. B. Egorov. L.: Nauka, 1974. S. 238-247.
12. Motyleva T. O vremeni i prostranstve v sovremennom zarubezhnom romane // Ritm, prostranstvo i
vremya v literature i iskusstve / Red. B. Egorov. L.: Nauka, 1974. S. 186-199.
13. Nazaykinskiy E. O psikhologii muzykal'nogo vospriyatiya. M.: Muzyka, 1972. 383 s.
14. Orlov G. Vremya i prostranstvo muzyki // Problemy muzykal'noy nauki / Red. G. Orlov, M. Tara-
kanov i dr. M.: Sov. kompozitor, 1972. Vyp. 2. S. 258-394.
15. Pokrovskiy B. Razmyshleniya ob opere: Kn. dlya uchashchikhsya. M.: Prosveshchenie, 1979. 192 s.
16. Polyakova L. «Evgeniy Onegin» na ekrane (o fil'me-opere) // Sov. muzyka. 1959. ¹ 6. S. 119.
17. Pritykina O. Muzykal'noe vremya. Ego kontseptual'nost', struktura, metody issledovaniya: Avtoref.
dis. … kand. iskusstvovedeniya. L., 1986. 19 s.
18. Rud' I., Tsukkerman I. O prostranstvenno-vremennykh preobrazovaniyakh v iskusstve // Ritm, pro-
stranstvo i vremya v literature i iskusstve / Otv. red. B. Egorov. L.: Nauka, 1974. S. 262-273.
19. Saparov M. Ob organizatsii prostranstvenno-vremennogo kontinuuma khudozhestvennogo proizve-
deniya // Ritm, prostranstvo i vremya v literature i iskusstve / Otv. red. B. Egorov. L.: Nauka, 1974.
S. 85-103.
20. Edkind M. O diapazone prostranstvenno-vremennykh otnosheniy v iskusstve oformleniya stseny: Opyt
analiza tvorcheskogo naslediya sovetskoy teatral'noy dekoratsii // Ritm, prostranstvo i vremya / Otv.
red. B. Egorov. L.: Nauka, 1974. S. 209-219.
21. Eynshteyn A. Sushchnost' teorii otnositel'nosti / Per. s angl. Izd. 4-e. M.: Inostr. literatura,
1955. 160 s.

Abstract: The author of the article analyzes the main challenges and difficulties arising before researchers during discussion of the ontological status of time. The author provides a comparative description of the main approaches to the problem in Russian and foreign philosophies. It is shown that the method of solving this problem depends on the way of perceiving the reality chosen by a researcher. The author also studies arguments for objectivation of such time factors as its flow, three modes (past, present and future) and dependence on changes described in a number of works by Russian philosophers. The author defines the main tendencies in solving the problem about the status of time in foreign philosophy: denial of objectivity of time flow, interest for the ‘block time’ concept and denial of the fundamental nature of time. The author also analyzes philosophical arguments for the block time concept and studies arguments against denial the reality of time. The author also offers methodological principles aimed at proving the relevancy of using the metaphysical terms and concepts for solving the problem of status of time in philosophy of science. The author also describes the difficulties associated with the implementation of the programs creating out-of-time metaphysics suggested by H. Price as well as ways to overcome these difficulties.

Keywords: philosophy, time, eternity, temporality, metaphysics, science, reality, realism, anti-realism, ontology.

Contact information: Zima Vadim Nikolaevich, 119991, Russia, Moscow, ul. Malaya Pirogovskaya, 1, bld. 1.

References:
1. Aksenov G.P. Prichina vremeni. M.: Editorial URSS, 2001. 304 s.
2. Anisov A.M. O ponyatiyakh napravlennosti i neobratimosti vremeni // Sinergetika vremeni. M.:
Reproniks, 2007. S. 171-195.
3. Vernadskiy V.I. Problema vremeni v sovremennoy nauke // Biosfera i noosfera. M.: Ayris-press,
2008. S. 483-519.
4. Zima V.N. Nekotorye aspekty predstavleniya vechnosti v antichnoy i rannesrednevekovoy filo-
sofii v kontekste sovremennykh problem ontologii i filosofii nauki. Prepodavatel' XXI vek.
M.: 2011. ¹ 2. S. 219-230.
5. Kazaryan V.P. Temporal'nost' i estestvennye nauki // Na puti k ponimaniyu fenomena vremeni:
konstruktsii vremeni v estestvoznanii. Ch. 3. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2009. S. 30-63.
6. Kazaryan V.P. Filosofskie problemy prostranstva i vremeni v estestvoznanii // Filosofiya este-
stvennykh nauk. M.: Akademicheskiy prospekt, 2006. S. 105-166.
7. Levich A.P. Pochemu skromny uspekhi v izuchenii vremeni // Na puti k ponimaniyu fenomena vremeni:
konstruktsii vremeni v estestvoznanii. Ch. 3. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2009. S. 15-29.
8. Mironov V.V., Ivanov A.V. Ontologiya i teoriya poznaniya. M.: Gardariki, 2005. 447 s.
9. Molchanov Yu.B. Chetyre kontseptsii vremeni v filosofii i fizike. M.: Nauka, 1977. 192 s.
10. Porus V.N. Nauchnyy realizm // Entsiklopediya epistemologii i filosofii nauki. M.: «Kanon+»
ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», 2009. S. 589-590.
11. Eynshteyn A. Vliyanie Maksvella na razvitie predstavleniy o fizicheskoy real'nosti // Eynshteyn A.
Sobranie nauchnykh trudov: v 4 t. T. 4. M., 1967. S. 136-139.
12. Callender C. Is Time an Illusion? (updated from previous issue of Scientific American, June 2010) // Scientific
American Special: A Matter of Time, 2011. Vol. 21. ¹ 1. P. 15-21.
13. Carrol S. From Eternity to Here: the Quest for the Ultimate Theory of Time. Duton, New York, 2010. 438 p.
14. Davies P. That Mysterious Flow (updated from previous issue of Scientific American, September 2002) //
Scientific American Special: A Matter of Time, 2011. Vol. 21. ¹ 1. P. 8-13.
15. Healey R. Can Physics Coherently Deny the Reality of Time? // Time, Reality &Experience /edited by Craig
Callender. N.Y., 2002. P. 293-316.
16. Kiefer C. Time in Quantum Gravity // The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Time. Oxford University
Press, 2011. P. 663-678.
17. Le Poidevin R. Relationism and Temporal Topology: Physics or Metaphysics? // The Philosophy of Time.
Oxford University Press, 1993. P. 149-167.
18. Loux. M.J. Metaphysics: a contemporary introduction / Michael J. Loux. 3rd ed. Routeledge, N.Y., L.,
2009. 309 p.
19. Oaklander L.N. The Ontology of Time. Prometheus Books. N.Y., 2004. 366 p.
20. Ontology // Encyclopedia of Time: Science, Philosophy, Theology and Culture. Vol. 2. 2009. P. 948-951.
21. Petkov V. Is There an Alternative to the Block Universe View? // The Ontology of Spasetime. Ed. D. Dieks.
Elsevier., 2006. P. 207-228.
22. Price H. The Flow of Time // The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Time. Oxford University Press, 2011.
P. 276-311.
23. Price H. Time’s Arrow and Archimedes’ Point. N.Y., 1996. xiii+306 p.
24. Rosenberg A. Philosophy of Science: A Contemporary Introduction. 2-nd ed. Routledge, N.Y., 2006. x+213 p.

References (transliteration):
1. Aksenov G.P. Prichina vremeni. M.: Editorial URSS, 2001. 304 s.
2. Anisov A.M. O ponyatiyakh napravlennosti i neobratimosti vremeni // Sinergetika vremeni. M.:
Reproniks, 2007. S. 171-195.
3. Vernadskiy V.I. Problema vremeni v sovremennoy nauke // Biosfera i noosfera. M.: Ayris-press,
2008. S. 483-519.
4. Zima V.N. Nekotorye aspekty predstavleniya vechnosti v antichnoy i rannesrednevekovoy filo-
sofii v kontekste sovremennykh problem ontologii i filosofii nauki. Prepodavatel' XXI vek.
M.: 2011. ¹ 2. S. 219-230.
5. Kazaryan V.P. Temporal'nost' i estestvennye nauki // Na puti k ponimaniyu fenomena vremeni:
konstruktsii vremeni v estestvoznanii. Ch. 3. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2009. S. 30-63.
6. Kazaryan V.P. Filosofskie problemy prostranstva i vremeni v estestvoznanii // Filosofiya este-
stvennykh nauk. M.: Akademicheskiy prospekt, 2006. S. 105-166.
7. Levich A.P. Pochemu skromny uspekhi v izuchenii vremeni // Na puti k ponimaniyu fenomena vremeni:
konstruktsii vremeni v estestvoznanii. Ch. 3. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2009. S. 15-29.
8. Mironov V.V., Ivanov A.V. Ontologiya i teoriya poznaniya. M.: Gardariki, 2005. 447 s.
9. Molchanov Yu.B. Chetyre kontseptsii vremeni v filosofii i fizike. M.: Nauka, 1977. 192 s.
10. Porus V.N. Nauchnyy realizm // Entsiklopediya epistemologii i filosofii nauki. M.: «Kanon+»
ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», 2009. S. 589-590.
11. Eynshteyn A. Vliyanie Maksvella na razvitie predstavleniy o fizicheskoy real'nosti // Eynshteyn A.
Sobranie nauchnykh trudov: v 4 t. T. 4. M., 1967. S. 136-139.
12. Callender C. Is Time an Illusion? (updated from previous issue of Scientific American, June 2010) // Scientific
American Special: A Matter of Time, 2011. Vol. 21. ¹ 1. P. 15-21.
13. Carrol S. From Eternity to Here: the Quest for the Ultimate Theory of Time. Duton, New York, 2010. 438 p.
14. Davies P. That Mysterious Flow (updated from previous issue of Scientific American, September 2002) //
Scientific American Special: A Matter of Time, 2011. Vol. 21. ¹ 1. P. 8-13.
15. Healey R. Can Physics Coherently Deny the Reality of Time? // Time, Reality &Experience /edited by Craig
Callender. N.Y., 2002. P. 293-316.
16. Kiefer C. Time in Quantum Gravity // The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Time. Oxford University
Press, 2011. P. 663-678.
17. Le Poidevin R. Relationism and Temporal Topology: Physics or Metaphysics? // The Philosophy of Time.
Oxford University Press, 1993. P. 149-167.
18. Loux. M.J. Metaphysics: a contemporary introduction / Michael J. Loux. 3rd ed. Routeledge, N.Y., L.,
2009. 309 p.
19. Oaklander L.N. The Ontology of Time. Prometheus Books. N.Y., 2004. 366 p.
20. Ontology // Encyclopedia of Time: Science, Philosophy, Theology and Culture. Vol. 2. 2009. P. 948-951.
21. Petkov V. Is There an Alternative to the Block Universe View? // The Ontology of Spasetime. Ed. D. Dieks.
Elsevier., 2006. P. 207-228.
22. Price H. The Flow of Time // The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Time. Oxford University Press, 2011.
P. 276-311.
23. Price H. Time’s Arrow and Archimedes’ Point. N.Y., 1996. xiii+306 p.
24. Rosenberg A. Philosophy of Science: A Contemporary Introduction. 2-nd ed. Routledge, N.Y., 2006. x+213 p.

Abstract: The author views the terms ‘tempo-world’ and ‘temporal integrity’ as a system and synergetic interaction between the past, present and future. The author studies the futurization and retrospection processes and their accelerated forms based on the example of biological and cosmological evolution. It is suggested that the process of accelerated time flow at an inflationary stage of the Big Bang should be considered the process of inflationary futurization. ‘Temporal inflation’ can be viewed as an extremely accelerated, incredibly fast advancing by the future of other tempo-worlds and even spatial expansion.

Keywords: philosophy, biogenetic law, advanced reflection, reflection, tempo-world, inflationary futurization, information, dark energy, retrospection, futurization.

References:
1. Astronomiya: vek XXI / Red.-sost. V.G. Surdin. Fryazino, 2007.
2. Global'nyy evolyutsionizm (filosofskiy aspekt) / Otv. red. V.G. Fesenkova. M.: IF RAN, 1994.
3. Gryaznova E.V., Ursul A.D. Informatsiya i virtual'naya real'nost': kontseptual'nye osnovaniya
problemy. N. Novgorod: NNGASU, 2012.
4. Gurevich I.M., Ursul A.D. Informatsiya — vseobshchee svoystvo materii. Kharakteristiki. Otsenki.
Ogranicheniya. Sledstviya. M.: Librokom, 2012.
5. Il'in I.V., Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A. Global'nyy evolyutsionizm: Idei, problemy, gipotezy. M.:
MGU, 2012
6. O sovremennom statuse global'nogo evolyutsionizma. M.: IF RAN, 1986.
7. Universal'naya i global'naya istoriya (Evolyutsiya Vselennoy, Zemli, zhizni, obshchestva) / Otv. red.
L.E. Grinin, A.V. Korotaev, I.V. Il'in. Volgograd: Uchitel', 2012.
8. Panov A.D. Universal'naya evolyutsiya i problema poiska vnezemnogo razuma (SETI). M.: Librokom,
2008.
9. Silk Dzh. Bol'shoy vzryv. Rozhdenie i evolyutsiya Vselennoy. M.: Mir, 1982.
10. Toffler E. Shok budushchego. M.: AST, 2001.
11. Universal'nyy evolyutsionizm i global'nye problemy / Otv. red. V.V. Kazyutinskiy, E.A. Mamchur.
M., 2007.
12. Ursul A.D. Global'nyy evolyutsionizm. Uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie. M., 2010.
13. Evolyutsiya: Diskussionye aspekty global'nykh evolyutsionnykh protsessov / Otv. red. L.E. Grinin,
A.V. Markov, A.V. Korotaev, I.V. Il'in. M., 2011.
14. Chaisson E.J. Cosmic evolution: the race of complexity in nature. Cambridge, 2001.
15. Globalistics and Globalization Studies / Ed. L.E. Grinin, I.V. Ilyinand, A.V. Korotayev. Volgograd: ‘Uchitel’
Publishing House, 2012.
16. 3G: Globalistics, Global Studies, Globalization Studies: Scientific Digest / Ed. by I.I. Abylgaziev, I.V. Ilyin.
M.: MAKS Press, 2012.

References (transliteration):
1. Astronomiya: vek XXI / Red.-sost. V.G. Surdin. Fryazino, 2007.
2. Global'nyy evolyutsionizm (filosofskiy aspekt) / Otv. red. V.G. Fesenkova. M.: IF RAN, 1994.
3. Gryaznova E.V., Ursul A.D. Informatsiya i virtual'naya real'nost': kontseptual'nye osnovaniya
problemy. N. Novgorod: NNGASU, 2012.
4. Gurevich I.M., Ursul A.D. Informatsiya — vseobshchee svoystvo materii. Kharakteristiki. Otsenki.
Ogranicheniya. Sledstviya. M.: Librokom, 2012.
5. Il'in I.V., Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A. Global'nyy evolyutsionizm: Idei, problemy, gipotezy. M.:
MGU, 2012
6. O sovremennom statuse global'nogo evolyutsionizma. M.: IF RAN, 1986.
7. Universal'naya i global'naya istoriya (Evolyutsiya Vselennoy, Zemli, zhizni, obshchestva) / Otv. red.
L.E. Grinin, A.V. Korotaev, I.V. Il'in. Volgograd: Uchitel', 2012.
8. Panov A.D. Universal'naya evolyutsiya i problema poiska vnezemnogo razuma (SETI). M.: Librokom,
2008.
9. Silk Dzh. Bol'shoy vzryv. Rozhdenie i evolyutsiya Vselennoy. M.: Mir, 1982.
10. Toffler E. Shok budushchego. M.: AST, 2001.
11. Universal'nyy evolyutsionizm i global'nye problemy / Otv. red. V.V. Kazyutinskiy, E.A. Mamchur.
M., 2007.
12. Ursul A.D. Global'nyy evolyutsionizm. Uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie. M., 2010.
13. Evolyutsiya: Diskussionye aspekty global'nykh evolyutsionnykh protsessov / Otv. red. L.E. Grinin,
A.V. Markov, A.V. Korotaev, I.V. Il'in. M., 2011.
14. Chaisson E.J. Cosmic evolution: the race of complexity in nature. Cambridge, 2001.
15. Globalistics and Globalization Studies / Ed. L.E. Grinin, I.V. Ilyinand, A.V. Korotayev. Volgograd: ‘Uchitel’
Publishing House, 2012.
16. 3G: Globalistics, Global Studies, Globalization Studies: Scientific Digest / Ed. by I.I. Abylgaziev, I.V. Ilyin.
M.: MAKS Press, 2012.

Abstract: Based on the researches of a number of philosophers, the author of the article forms and develops the concept of a double understanding of time. The article also touches upon the problem of the relation between the inner (subjective) and objective (physical) time. The author studies the interaction between these two concepts and defines differences and similarities between these phenomena. The author also shares his ideas regarding a human choosing a certain attitude towards the phenomenon of time.

Keywords: philosophy, time, existential time, physical time, duration, interval, homogeneity, variability, movement, consciousness.

References:
1. Florenskiy P.A. Ikonostas. SPb., 1993.
2. Florenskiy P.A. Mnimosti v geometrii. M., 1991.
3. Safonov A. Pavel Florenskiy, Georg Kantor i problema tvorchestva v matematike. Internet-istochnik:
http://ec-dejavu.ru/f-2/Florensky_Cantor.html.
4. Mariten Zh. Ot Bergsona k Fome Akvinskomu. Ocherki metafiziki i etiki. M., 2006.
5. Berdyaev N.A. Tsarstvo Dukha i tsarstvo kesarya. M.: Respublika, 1995.
6. Kandinskiy V. Tochka i liniya na ploskosti. SPb, 2011.
7. Ieromonakh Mikhail (Gribanovskiy). Istina bytiya Bozhiya. Reprint. SPb, 2004.
8. Anisov A.M. Aporii Zenona i problema dvizheniya // Trudy nauchno-issledovatel'skogo seminara
Logicheskogo tsentra Instituta filosofii RAN / RAN. In-t filosofii, Obshchestv. in-t logiki, kog-
nitologii i razvitiya lichnosti. Vyp. 14. M., 2000.
9. Yavorskiy B.M., Detlaf A.A. Spravochnik po fizike dlya inzhenerov i studentov VUZov. M., 1968.
10. Bergson A. Tvorcheskaya evolyutsiya. Materiya i pamyat'. Mn., 1999.
11. Gusserl' E. Logicheskie issledovaniya. Kartezianskie razmyshleniya. Mn.-M., 2000.

References (transliteration):
1. Florenskiy P.A. Ikonostas. SPb., 1993.
2. Florenskiy P.A. Mnimosti v geometrii. M., 1991.
3. Safonov A. Pavel Florenskiy, Georg Kantor i problema tvorchestva v matematike. Internet-istochnik:
http://ec-dejavu.ru/f-2/Florensky_Cantor.html.
4. Mariten Zh. Ot Bergsona k Fome Akvinskomu. Ocherki metafiziki i etiki. M., 2006.
5. Berdyaev N.A. Tsarstvo Dukha i tsarstvo kesarya. M.: Respublika, 1995.
6. Kandinskiy V. Tochka i liniya na ploskosti. SPb, 2011.
7. Ieromonakh Mikhail (Gribanovskiy). Istina bytiya Bozhiya. Reprint. SPb, 2004.
8. Anisov A.M. Aporii Zenona i problema dvizheniya // Trudy nauchno-issledovatel'skogo seminara
Logicheskogo tsentra Instituta filosofii RAN / RAN. In-t filosofii, Obshchestv. in-t logiki, kog-
nitologii i razvitiya lichnosti. Vyp. 14. M., 2000.
9. Yavorskiy B.M., Detlaf A.A. Spravochnik po fizike dlya inzhenerov i studentov VUZov. M., 1968.
10. Bergson A. Tvorcheskaya evolyutsiya. Materiya i pamyat'. Mn., 1999.
11. Gusserl' E. Logicheskie issledovaniya. Kartezianskie razmyshleniya. Mn.-M., 2000.

Abstract: Renewed superstring theory gives a mechanistic potential to travel through time.

Keywords: philosophy, antimatter, quantum web, super-string matrix, time machine, positron, spacelike dimension, superstring, electron.

References:
1. Klyagin N.V. Sovremennaya nauchnaya kartina mira: Ucheb. posobie. — M.: Universitetskaya kniga,
Logos, 2007. — 264 s.
2. Klyagin N.V. V ozhidanii superkollaydera // Vysshee obrazovanie segodnya. — 2009. — ¹ 6. — S. 14-23.
3. Klyagin N.V. Superkollaydery i filosofiya // Filosofiya i kul'tura. — 2009. — ¹ 11. — S. 57-75.
4. Klyagin N.V. Termoyadernye reaktory // Vysshee obrazovanie segodnya. — 2010. — ¹ 12. — S. 10-20.
5. Teksty piramid. — SPb.: Zhurnal «Neva»; «Letniy sad», 2000. — 464 s.
6. Beckerath J. von. Handbuch der ägyptischen Königsnamen. — München, Berlin: Deutcher Kunstverlag,
1984. — 314 s.

References (transliteration):
1. Klyagin N.V. Sovremennaya nauchnaya kartina mira: Ucheb. posobie. — M.: Universitetskaya kniga,
Logos, 2007. — 264 s.
2. Klyagin N.V. V ozhidanii superkollaydera // Vysshee obrazovanie segodnya. — 2009. — ¹ 6. — S. 14-23.
3. Klyagin N.V. Superkollaydery i filosofiya // Filosofiya i kul'tura. — 2009. — ¹ 11. — S. 57-75.
4. Klyagin N.V. Termoyadernye reaktory // Vysshee obrazovanie segodnya. — 2010. — ¹ 12. — S. 10-20.
5. Teksty piramid. — SPb.: Zhurnal «Neva»; «Letniy sad», 2000. — 464 s.
6. Beckerath J. von. Handbuch der ägyptischen Königsnamen. — München, Berlin: Deutcher Kunstverlag,
1984. — 314 s.