Abstract: The article considers the phenomenon of political coordination of public interests through a prism of a system approach. According to the author, there are institutionalized and non-institutionalized mechanisms by means of which public interests are being coordinated. These mechanisms are divided by the author into two types: horizontal and vertical. The first type of mechanism provides convergence of interests of subjects sharing the same political status and having similar political resources (subjects being ordinary citizens, interest groups, parliamentary fractions, deputy groups, etc.). The mechanisms of the second type are realized by means of vertical communication of the actors, who take different positions in hierarchy of political system - governmental institutes and interest groups. The methodological basis of the research is a systemic, structural and functional, comparative political approaches, methods of analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, observation. The author compares the coordination mechanisms of public interest with various forms of electoral and functional representation and comes to a conclusion that balance in public interest can be achieved using political mechanisms such as public lobbying, social partnership, as well as institutes of direct democracy and parliamentary procedures. The system of administrative and communicative mechanisms by means of which the state carries out the regulation of public interests is also described in the article. The author considers "the soft power" as a prospective mechanism of harmonization of interests of the government and society.

Keywords: diplomacy, international relations, U.S. foreign policy, world politics, Russia, geopolitics, interests, state, security, risks

References:
Burd'e P. Sotsiologiya politiki. — M.: Socio-Logos, 1993.
Gainullina F.I. Stanovlenie sistemy sotsial'nogo partnerstva v respublike Tatarstan (politologicheskiy analiz). Avtoreferat diss. na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni d.p.n. M., 1999.
Zhirnov A.G. Politicheskie mekhanizmy soglasovaniya obshchestvennykh interesov: nekotorye aspekty teorii i praktiki // Vestn. Tambovskogo un-ta. Ser. «Gumanitarnye nauki». 2008. Vyp. 3. S. 350-357.
Molkova M.A. Sotsial'noe partnerstvo i profsoyuzy v sisteme zadach politicheskoy modernizatsii // Chelovek. Obshchestvo. Upravlenie. 2011. №2. S. 83 – 90.
Rudenko V.N. Konsul'tativnye obshchestvennye sovety: osobennosti organizatsii i deyatel'nosti // Politicheskaya ekspertiza: POLITEKS. 2006. S. 143 – 145.
Tolstik V.A. Referendum v Rossii: osnovy, opyt, krtika // Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2013. № 24. S. 9-14.
Shvartsenberg R.Zh. Politicheskaya sotsiologiya: V 3 ch. – Ch.1. – M.: Prosveshchenie, 1992.
Nye J. Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power. – Ney York, 1990.
Budaev A.V. Sravnitel'nyy analiz «myagkoy sily» vo vneshney politike Rossii i Brazilii. // Latinskaya Amerika. 2014. № 4. S. 24-31.
Sledzevskiy I.V., Filippov V.R., Khabenskaya E.O. Vliyanie SMI na formirovanie etnicheskikh stereotipov obshchestvennogo soznaniya v stolichnom megapolise. M., 2005.
Filippov V.R. Sovetskaya teoriya etnosa. Istoriograficheskiy ocherk / Ser. Istoriya nauki. M., 2010.
Manoylo A.V. Paradigmy upravleniya mezhdunarodnymi konfliktami: konkurentsiya ili konfrontatsiya. // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. 2011. № 5. S. 135-142.
Filippova E.I., Filippov V.R. Gosudarstvo i obshchestvo pered litsom sotsial'nogo krizisa (dve paradigmy: rossiyskaya i frantsuzskaya) // Ezhegodnyy doklad Seti etnologicheskogo monitoringa i rannego preduprezhdeniya konfliktov. 2005. Moskva, 2006. S. 12-25.
Manoylo A.V. Mirnoe razreshenie mezhdunarodnykh konfliktov: natsional'nye kontseptsii, modeli, tekhnologii. // Vlast'. 2008. № 8. S. 79-83
Bocharnikov I.V. Terroristicheskaya gruppirovka «Islamskoe gosudarstvo» kak zakonomernoe sledstvie blizhnevostochnoy strategii SShA // Trendy i upravlenie. - 2015. - 4. - C. 395 - 402. DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2015.4.17007.
Neymatov A.Ya. Teoreticheskie aspekty issledovaniya tsvetnykh revolyutsiy // Trendy i upravlenie. - 2015. - 4. - C. 359 - 365. DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2015.4.16913.
Kalachev D.N. Sovremennaya sistema mezhdunarodnoy bezopasnosti: sredovye parametry // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2014. - 4. - C. 544 - 549. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.4.13243.
Karyakin V.V. Tsivilizatsionnaya antropologiya amerikanskogo ekspansionizma:
ot doktriny Monro k global'nomu liderstvu // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 487 - 468. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.4.9722.
Karpovich O.G. Mezhdunarodnye organizatsii i ikh rol' v preduprezhdenii, uregulirovanii i razreshenii etnopoliticheskikh konfliktov // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2014. - 3. - C. 398 - 405. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2014.3.11786.

References (transliteration):
Burd'e P. Sotsiologiya politiki. — M.: Socio-Logos, 1993.
Gainullina F.I. Stanovlenie sistemy sotsial'nogo partnerstva v respublike Tatarstan (politologicheskiy analiz). Avtoreferat diss. na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni d.p.n. M., 1999.
Zhirnov A.G. Politicheskie mekhanizmy soglasovaniya obshchestvennykh interesov: nekotorye aspekty teorii i praktiki // Vestn. Tambovskogo un-ta. Ser. «Gumanitarnye nauki». 2008. Vyp. 3. S. 350-357.
Molkova M.A. Sotsial'noe partnerstvo i profsoyuzy v sisteme zadach politicheskoy modernizatsii // Chelovek. Obshchestvo. Upravlenie. 2011. №2. S. 83 – 90.
Rudenko V.N. Konsul'tativnye obshchestvennye sovety: osobennosti organizatsii i deyatel'nosti // Politicheskaya ekspertiza: POLITEKS. 2006. S. 143 – 145.
Tolstik V.A. Referendum v Rossii: osnovy, opyt, krtika // Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2013. № 24. S. 9-14.
Shvartsenberg R.Zh. Politicheskaya sotsiologiya: V 3 ch. – Ch.1. – M.: Prosveshchenie, 1992.
Nye J. Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power. – Ney York, 1990.
Budaev A.V. Sravnitel'nyy analiz «myagkoy sily» vo vneshney politike Rossii i Brazilii. // Latinskaya Amerika. 2014. № 4. S. 24-31.
Sledzevskiy I.V., Filippov V.R., Khabenskaya E.O. Vliyanie SMI na formirovanie etnicheskikh stereotipov obshchestvennogo soznaniya v stolichnom megapolise. M., 2005.
Filippov V.R. Sovetskaya teoriya etnosa. Istoriograficheskiy ocherk / Ser. Istoriya nauki. M., 2010.
Manoylo A.V. Paradigmy upravleniya mezhdunarodnymi konfliktami: konkurentsiya ili konfrontatsiya. // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. 2011. № 5. S. 135-142.
Filippova E.I., Filippov V.R. Gosudarstvo i obshchestvo pered litsom sotsial'nogo krizisa (dve paradigmy: rossiyskaya i frantsuzskaya) // Ezhegodnyy doklad Seti etnologicheskogo monitoringa i rannego preduprezhdeniya konfliktov. 2005. Moskva, 2006. S. 12-25.
Manoylo A.V. Mirnoe razreshenie mezhdunarodnykh konfliktov: natsional'nye kontseptsii, modeli, tekhnologii. // Vlast'. 2008. № 8. S. 79-83
Bocharnikov I.V. Terroristicheskaya gruppirovka «Islamskoe gosudarstvo» kak zakonomernoe sledstvie blizhnevostochnoy strategii SShA // Trendy i upravlenie. - 2015. - 4. - C. 395 - 402. DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2015.4.17007.
Neymatov A.Ya. Teoreticheskie aspekty issledovaniya tsvetnykh revolyutsiy // Trendy i upravlenie. - 2015. - 4. - C. 359 - 365. DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2015.4.16913.
Kalachev D.N. Sovremennaya sistema mezhdunarodnoy bezopasnosti: sredovye parametry // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2014. - 4. - C. 544 - 549. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.4.13243.
Karyakin V.V. Tsivilizatsionnaya antropologiya amerikanskogo ekspansionizma:
ot doktriny Monro k global'nomu liderstvu // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 487 - 468. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.4.9722.
Karpovich O.G. Mezhdunarodnye organizatsii i ikh rol' v preduprezhdenii, uregulirovanii i razreshenii etnopoliticheskikh konfliktov // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2014. - 3. - C. 398 - 405. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2014.3.11786.