Reference:
Muratov, A. M..
Neoidealistic Tendencies
in Russian Fine Arts
// Culture and Art. – 2013. – ¹ 4.
– P. 439-445.
DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2013.4.9223.
rubric Ñòèëè, òå÷åíèÿ, øêîëû
DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2013.4.9223
Read the article
Review: the author of the article offers and proves the hypothesis about a special art trend in XX century
which has its roots in art culture of the second half of XIX century. Most clearly these trends were formulated
by German Neoidealists who based on their own creative practice. However, art history viewed Neoidealism
as a local phenomenon of German culture while the author of this article describes it as one of the fundamental
art tendencies during the last century and a half in Germany and Europe as well as in Russia where it was
developed, first of all, in Favorsky’s and his students’ art work as well as work by a number of sculptors and
artists. Noteworthy that Neoidealism was not an independently developing phenomenon and interacted with
such phenomena as Post-Impressionism, Symbolism, Modern, Neoclassicism and Avant-garde. Despite all that,
Neoidealism managed to retain its own essence and peculiarity.
Keywords: neoidealism, neoclassicism, neoromanticism, official school of art history, main art trends, fine arts, sculpture, relief principle, monumental art, art theory.
Contact information: Muratov Alexander Mikhailovich, 199034, Russia, St. Petersburg, Universitetskya naberezhnaya 7-9.
References:
1. Aleksandr Matveev i ego shkola / Gosudarstvennyy Russkiy predstavlyaet: Al'manakh. Vyp. 84. SPb.: Palace
Editions, 2005. – 228 s., il.
2. Baranovskiy V. I., Khlebnikova I. B. Anton Azhbe i khudozhniki Rossii. M.: Izd-vo MGU, 2001. – 256 s., il.
3. Gil'debrand A. Problema formy v izobrazitel'nom iskusstve i sobranie statey. Per. N.B. Rozenfel'da,
V.A. Favorskogo. M.: Musaget', 1914. – 196 s., il.
4. Domogatskiy V. N. / Teoreticheskie raboty, issledovaniya, stat'i, pis'ma / Sost., vstupit. st. S. P. Domogats-
koy. M.: Sovetskiy khudozhnik, 1984. – 368 s., il.
5. Zhivopis' 20-30-kh godov / Sostavitel' i avtor nauchnogo apparata A. M. Muratov. Vstupitel'naya stat'ya
V. S. Manina. SPb: Khudozhnik RSFSR, 1991. – 200 s., il.
6. Zubov V. P. Stradnye gody Rossii. M.: Indrik, 2004. – 320 s.; il.
7. Manin V. S. A. I. Kuindzhi i ego shkola. L.: Khudozhnik RSFSR, 1987. – 220 s., il.
8. Muratov A. M. K voprosu ob istokakh tvorchestva A. D. Goncharova // Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo
universiteta pechati. M., 2006, ¹ 3. S. 9-37.
9. Muratov A. M. Neoidealizm v izobrazitel'nom iskusstve / A. Blok i Pskovskiy kray (Materialy I
Blokovskikh chteniy). Pskov: Izdatel'stvo Oblastnogo tsentra narodnogo tvorchestva, 2005. – 132 s. S. 37-42.
10. Muratov A. M. Puteshestviya Borisa Anrepa v prostranstve i vremeni // Kul'turnoe prostranstvo pute-
shestviy. Materialy nauchnogo foruma SPbGU. SPb.: Tsentr izucheniya kul'tury, 2003. – 350 s. S. 229-233.
11. Muratov A. M. Sergey Konstantinovich Zaryanko: khudozhnik, pedagog, teoretik iskusstva. SPb.: Dmitriy
Bulanin, 2003. – 260 s., il.
12. Muratov A. M. Shkola Kardovskogo // Yunyy khudozhnik, 1989, ¹ 10, s. 38-41
13. Sergey Merkurov / Sost. G. S. Merkurov, vstupit. st. I. G. Merkurovoy M.: Izobrazitel'noe iskusstvo, 1988.
– 160 s., il.
14. Favorskiy V. A. Literaturno-teoreticheskoe nasledie. M.: Sovetskiy khudozhnik, 1988. – 588 s., il.
15. Khofman Verner. Osnovy sovremennogo iskusstva. Vvedenie v ego simvolicheskie formy / Per. s nem.
A. Belobratova; red. I. Chechot i A. Lepork – SPb.: Akademichekiy proekt, 2004. – 560 s., il.
References (transliteration):
1. Aleksandr Matveev i ego shkola / Gosudarstvennyy Russkiy predstavlyaet: Al'manakh. Vyp. 84. SPb.: Palace
Editions, 2005. – 228 s., il.
2. Baranovskiy V. I., Khlebnikova I. B. Anton Azhbe i khudozhniki Rossii. M.: Izd-vo MGU, 2001. – 256 s., il.
3. Gil'debrand A. Problema formy v izobrazitel'nom iskusstve i sobranie statey. Per. N.B. Rozenfel'da,
V.A. Favorskogo. M.: Musaget', 1914. – 196 s., il.
4. Domogatskiy V. N. / Teoreticheskie raboty, issledovaniya, stat'i, pis'ma / Sost., vstupit. st. S. P. Domogats-
koy. M.: Sovetskiy khudozhnik, 1984. – 368 s., il.
5. Zhivopis' 20-30-kh godov / Sostavitel' i avtor nauchnogo apparata A. M. Muratov. Vstupitel'naya stat'ya
V. S. Manina. SPb: Khudozhnik RSFSR, 1991. – 200 s., il.
6. Zubov V. P. Stradnye gody Rossii. M.: Indrik, 2004. – 320 s.; il.
7. Manin V. S. A. I. Kuindzhi i ego shkola. L.: Khudozhnik RSFSR, 1987. – 220 s., il.
8. Muratov A. M. K voprosu ob istokakh tvorchestva A. D. Goncharova // Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo
universiteta pechati. M., 2006, ¹ 3. S. 9-37.
9. Muratov A. M. Neoidealizm v izobrazitel'nom iskusstve / A. Blok i Pskovskiy kray (Materialy I
Blokovskikh chteniy). Pskov: Izdatel'stvo Oblastnogo tsentra narodnogo tvorchestva, 2005. – 132 s. S. 37-42.
10. Muratov A. M. Puteshestviya Borisa Anrepa v prostranstve i vremeni // Kul'turnoe prostranstvo pute-
shestviy. Materialy nauchnogo foruma SPbGU. SPb.: Tsentr izucheniya kul'tury, 2003. – 350 s. S. 229-233.
11. Muratov A. M. Sergey Konstantinovich Zaryanko: khudozhnik, pedagog, teoretik iskusstva. SPb.: Dmitriy
Bulanin, 2003. – 260 s., il.
12. Muratov A. M. Shkola Kardovskogo // Yunyy khudozhnik, 1989, ¹ 10, s. 38-41
13. Sergey Merkurov / Sost. G. S. Merkurov, vstupit. st. I. G. Merkurovoy M.: Izobrazitel'noe iskusstvo, 1988.
– 160 s., il.
14. Favorskiy V. A. Literaturno-teoreticheskoe nasledie. M.: Sovetskiy khudozhnik, 1988. – 588 s., il.
15. Khofman Verner. Osnovy sovremennogo iskusstva. Vvedenie v ego simvolicheskie formy / Per. s nem.
A. Belobratova; red. I. Chechot i A. Lepork – SPb.: Akademichekiy proekt, 2004. – 560 s., il.