Abstract: The subject of the present research article is the relationship between politics and translation as they have been formed in Russia. Special attention is paid to the political idea of 'invasion' of a text into culture through translation. The aforesaid idea opposes to the idea of mutual enrichment of cultures. Analyzing polemics evolving around Russian translations of writings by one of Nazi theorists Carl Schmitt, the author of the article points at the theory of cultural translation that can be implicitly found in Dostoevsky's works and Benjamin's concept of absolute translability that allows to better understand why it is Russia where Smitt's political ideas turned out to be in such demand. The research article is based on the immanentist methodology that defines the scope of a common political and cultural action and, as a result, allows to view the idea of translation from the point of view of political theories and translation concepts that may provide much material for better understanding of the political. The main result of the research is the author's discovery of the political unconscious existing in each translated text as well as the political desire expressed in a certain selection of these or those texts and authors to be iconic, especially those that express ideas and values alien to a particular culture. 

Keywords: universal sympathy, nazism, Dostoevsky, Walter Benjamin, Carl Schmitt, hospitality, invasion, politics, translation, political unconscious

References:
Benjamin W. Zur Kritik der Gewalt // Walter Benjamin Gesammelte Schriften, vol. II.1,herausgegeben von R. Tiedemann e H. Schweppenhäuser, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M. 1999, S. 179-204.
Agamben G. Homo Sacer. State of Exception. Chicago, 2005.-104 p.
Shmitt K. Nomos Zemli. M.: Vladimir Dal', 2008. — 672 s
Shmitt K. Teoriya partizana. M: Praksis, 2007.-304 s.
Shmitt K. Leviafan v uchenii o gosudarstve Tomasa Gobbsa. M: Civitas Terrena, 2006.-300 s.
Shmitt K. Diktatura. Ot istokov sovremennoy idei suvereniteta do proletarskoy klassovoy bor'by. SPb.: Nauka, 2005.-326 s.
Shmitt K. Politicheskaya teologiya. M: Kanon-Press, 2000.-336 S.
Shmitt K. Ponyatie politicheskogo // Voprosy sotsiologii, ¹1, 1992. S.37-67.
Filippov A. O Karle Shmite // Index. Dos'e na tsenzuru. ¹10, 2000. S.270-275.
Mikhaylovskiy A. Bor'ba za Karla Shmitta. O retseptsii i aktual'nosti ponyatiya politicheskogo // Voprosy filosofii, ¹7, 2008.S. 158-171.
Kapustin B. Iz pis'ma Aleksandru Filippovu // Index. Dos'e na tsenzuru. ¹10, 2000. S. 34-35. (http://www.index.org.ru/nb/2000/schmitt.html).
Kyustin A de. Rossiya v 1839 godu. T.1. M: Izdatel'stvo Sabashnikovykh, 1996.-526 s.
Dostoevskiy F. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy, t. 26. Leningrad: Nauka, 1984. S.129-149.
Gasparov M.L. Bryusov i bukvalizm. – V kn. Poetika perevoda. M., 1988. C.29-62.
Ben'yamin V. Zadacha perevodchika // Kommentarii, ¹13, 1996. C.65-86.
Bourdieu P. L'Ontologie politique de Martin Heidegger. P., Minite, 1988.-128 p.
Farias V. Heidegger and Nazism. Temple University Press, 1989.-344 p.
Mouffe Ch. The Democratic Paradox, London: Verso, 2000.-160 p.
The Challenge of Carl Schmitt. Ed. By Chantal Mouffe. London: Verso, 1999.-220 p.

References (transliteration):
Benjamin W. Zur Kritik der Gewalt // Walter Benjamin Gesammelte Schriften, vol. II.1,herausgegeben von R. Tiedemann e H. Schweppenhäuser, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M. 1999, S. 179-204.
Agamben G. Homo Sacer. State of Exception. Chicago, 2005.-104 p.
Shmitt K. Nomos Zemli. M.: Vladimir Dal', 2008. — 672 s
Shmitt K. Teoriya partizana. M: Praksis, 2007.-304 s.
Shmitt K. Leviafan v uchenii o gosudarstve Tomasa Gobbsa. M: Civitas Terrena, 2006.-300 s.
Shmitt K. Diktatura. Ot istokov sovremennoy idei suvereniteta do proletarskoy klassovoy bor'by. SPb.: Nauka, 2005.-326 s.
Shmitt K. Politicheskaya teologiya. M: Kanon-Press, 2000.-336 S.
Shmitt K. Ponyatie politicheskogo // Voprosy sotsiologii, ¹1, 1992. S.37-67.
Filippov A. O Karle Shmite // Index. Dos'e na tsenzuru. ¹10, 2000. S.270-275.
Mikhaylovskiy A. Bor'ba za Karla Shmitta. O retseptsii i aktual'nosti ponyatiya politicheskogo // Voprosy filosofii, ¹7, 2008.S. 158-171.
Kapustin B. Iz pis'ma Aleksandru Filippovu // Index. Dos'e na tsenzuru. ¹10, 2000. S. 34-35. (http://www.index.org.ru/nb/2000/schmitt.html).
Kyustin A de. Rossiya v 1839 godu. T.1. M: Izdatel'stvo Sabashnikovykh, 1996.-526 s.
Dostoevskiy F. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy, t. 26. Leningrad: Nauka, 1984. S.129-149.
Gasparov M.L. Bryusov i bukvalizm. – V kn. Poetika perevoda. M., 1988. C.29-62.
Ben'yamin V. Zadacha perevodchika // Kommentarii, ¹13, 1996. C.65-86.
Bourdieu P. L'Ontologie politique de Martin Heidegger. P., Minite, 1988.-128 p.
Farias V. Heidegger and Nazism. Temple University Press, 1989.-344 p.
Mouffe Ch. The Democratic Paradox, London: Verso, 2000.-160 p.
The Challenge of Carl Schmitt. Ed. By Chantal Mouffe. London: Verso, 1999.-220 p.

Abstract: The object of the research is the phenomenon of parascience. The subject of the research is parascience as a cultural and historical phenomenon and subculture. The author of the article examines such aspects of the topic as the relationship between science and parascience from the point of view of their cultural and historical development as well as modern environment. The author also develops her own philosophical and cultural definition of parascience as a subculture that has evolved from marginality to antisystematicity. Special attention is paid to the aspect of the author's substantiation of essential features of parascientific destructive forms that try to look like science as well as the main characteristics of the parascientific subcultural complex. The author of the research bases her research of the cultural and historical phenomenology of parascience on the multi-disciplinary approach and philosophical-methodological concepts of culture taking into account chronotopos characteristics of an active concrete-historical individual involved in specific subcultural communities and groups. The main research method used by the author is a classical dialectical method. The novelty of the research is caused by the fact that the author focuses on the philosophical and theoretical problem of cultural and historical phenomenology of parascience because, first of all, solution of this problem can be found at the intersection of classical and non-classical methodological paradigms of knowledge based on ontological and epistemological grounds. According to the author, in order to solve the problem it is necessary to establish a philosophical and cultural concept of parascience as a subcultural formation in different cultural and historical knowledge systems. As the main conclusion of the research, the author offers her own philosophical and culturological definition of parascience as a subculture in terms of specifics of the parascientific discourse. 

Keywords: marginality, borderline, parascientific subculture complex, mimicry, destructive formations, parascientific discourse, rationalism, science, subculture, culture

References:
Omel'chenko E.L. Pro emo, gotov i nravstvennost' // URL: http: //www.polit.ru/autor/2009/01/23/subkult. html.
Kalinina G.N. Avtoref. dissertatsii … d.filos. n. / 09.00.01 – teoriya i istoriya kul'tury. Belgorod: NIU «BelGU», 2015. 45 s.
Kalinina G.N. Ratsional'naya i paranauchnaya formy miroponimaniya // Nauchnye vedomosti BelGU. Seriya «Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Pravo». ¹ 8 (127) 2012. Vyp. 20. Belgorod, 2012. S. 254-260.
Rimskiy V, Rimskaya O. Fenomen subkul'turnykh religiy / Monografiya. Saarbryuken, Palmarium Academic Publishing, 2012.
Kalinina G.N., Rimskiy V.P. Samopolaganie nauki i prevrashchennye formy znaniya // Nauchnye vedomosti BelGU. Seriya «Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Pravo». ¹ 20 (139) 2012. Vyp. 22. Belgorod, 2012. S. 28-39.
Rimskaya O.N., Rimskiy V.P. Metodologiya issledovaniya subkul'tur v sotsial'no-gumanitarnykh naukakh. Stat'ya 4. Konfiguratsii molodezhnykh subkul'tur v prostranstve rossiyskogo regiona // Nauchnye vedomosti BelGU. Seriya Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Pravo. ¹20 (91). Vyp. 14. Belgorod, 2010.
Ignatova V.S., Rimskiy V.P. Genezis nauki, innovatsiy i nauchnogo universiteta (k devyanostoletiyu so dnya rozhdeniya M.K. Petrova) // Nauka. Iskusstvo. Kul'tura / Nauchnyy retsenziruemyy zhurnal BGIIK. Vyp 2. Belgorod, 2013.
Rimskaya O.N., Rimskiy V.P. Sovremennoe mifosoznanie i subkul'turnye religii // Nauchnye vedomosti BelGU. Seriya Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Pravo. ¹8 (127). Vyp. 20. Belgorod, 2012.
Kalinina G.N. Diss … d.filos. n. / 09.00.01 – teoriya i istoriya kul'tury. Belgorod: NIU «BelGU», 2015. 286 s.
Rozin V.M. Demarkatsiya nauki i religii. Analiz ucheniya Emmanuelya Svedenborga. M., 2007.
Rozin V.M. Myshlenie i tvorchestvo. M., 2006;Tipy i diskursy nauchnogo myshleniya. M., 2000.
Ukolova V.I. Pod sen'yu korolevskoy arki // Moramarko M. Masonstvo v proshlom i nastoyashchem: Per. s it./ Vstup. st. i obshch. red. V. I. Ukolovoy. M., 1989. S.
Kokhanovskiy V.P., Przhilenskiy V.I., Sergodeeva E.A. Filosofiya nauki. Rostov N/D, 2006.
Shchavelev S.P. Etika i psikhologiya nauki. Dopolnitel'nye glavy kursa istorii i filosofii nauki. Kursk, 2010.
Ivanov K. P. Agressivnaya lzhenauka // Vestnik RAN. 2002. T. 72. ¹ 1. S. 30–36.

References (transliteration):
Omel'chenko E.L. Pro emo, gotov i nravstvennost' // URL: http: //www.polit.ru/autor/2009/01/23/subkult. html.
Kalinina G.N. Avtoref. dissertatsii … d.filos. n. / 09.00.01 – teoriya i istoriya kul'tury. Belgorod: NIU «BelGU», 2015. 45 s.
Kalinina G.N. Ratsional'naya i paranauchnaya formy miroponimaniya // Nauchnye vedomosti BelGU. Seriya «Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Pravo». ¹ 8 (127) 2012. Vyp. 20. Belgorod, 2012. S. 254-260.
Rimskiy V, Rimskaya O. Fenomen subkul'turnykh religiy / Monografiya. Saarbryuken, Palmarium Academic Publishing, 2012.
Kalinina G.N., Rimskiy V.P. Samopolaganie nauki i prevrashchennye formy znaniya // Nauchnye vedomosti BelGU. Seriya «Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Pravo». ¹ 20 (139) 2012. Vyp. 22. Belgorod, 2012. S. 28-39.
Rimskaya O.N., Rimskiy V.P. Metodologiya issledovaniya subkul'tur v sotsial'no-gumanitarnykh naukakh. Stat'ya 4. Konfiguratsii molodezhnykh subkul'tur v prostranstve rossiyskogo regiona // Nauchnye vedomosti BelGU. Seriya Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Pravo. ¹20 (91). Vyp. 14. Belgorod, 2010.
Ignatova V.S., Rimskiy V.P. Genezis nauki, innovatsiy i nauchnogo universiteta (k devyanostoletiyu so dnya rozhdeniya M.K. Petrova) // Nauka. Iskusstvo. Kul'tura / Nauchnyy retsenziruemyy zhurnal BGIIK. Vyp 2. Belgorod, 2013.
Rimskaya O.N., Rimskiy V.P. Sovremennoe mifosoznanie i subkul'turnye religii // Nauchnye vedomosti BelGU. Seriya Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Pravo. ¹8 (127). Vyp. 20. Belgorod, 2012.
Kalinina G.N. Diss … d.filos. n. / 09.00.01 – teoriya i istoriya kul'tury. Belgorod: NIU «BelGU», 2015. 286 s.
Rozin V.M. Demarkatsiya nauki i religii. Analiz ucheniya Emmanuelya Svedenborga. M., 2007.
Rozin V.M. Myshlenie i tvorchestvo. M., 2006;Tipy i diskursy nauchnogo myshleniya. M., 2000.
Ukolova V.I. Pod sen'yu korolevskoy arki // Moramarko M. Masonstvo v proshlom i nastoyashchem: Per. s it./ Vstup. st. i obshch. red. V. I. Ukolovoy. M., 1989. S.
Kokhanovskiy V.P., Przhilenskiy V.I., Sergodeeva E.A. Filosofiya nauki. Rostov N/D, 2006.
Shchavelev S.P. Etika i psikhologiya nauki. Dopolnitel'nye glavy kursa istorii i filosofii nauki. Kursk, 2010.
Ivanov K. P. Agressivnaya lzhenauka // Vestnik RAN. 2002. T. 72. ¹ 1. S. 30–36.

Abstract: The article is devoted to the analysis of the Theatre of the Absurd as the cultural and artistic phenomenon of the 1950s-1970s. The researcher analyzes the phenomenon from the point of view of universality and uniqueness. Belousova describes the prerequisites for absurd drama that existed in that period such as the crisis of culture and consciousness in the post-war period, orientation at the total denial of overall rules of physical and social life and alogical 'distortion' of the essential universals of human existence. Special attention is paid to the analysis of the tragic characteristics of absurd existence in art and philosophy and destruction of a hero in paradoxical antiplays. Following the principles of the philosophical and cultural research, the author of the article applies the activity approach to culture which requires to view the methods of confirmation of the idea of uniqueness and spheres where the unique was opposed to the universal as well as results of such opposition expressed, in our case, in the realities of artistic culture. The main contribution of the research is the author's statement about the total disharmony between essential man's aspirations and the absence of 'response' from the reality. According to the author, that was the source of the absurd phenomenon. The novelty of the research is caused by the fact that the author defines the antinomy of the philosophy of the absurd as the collision of its two dimensions, nigilistic and existential. However, existential absurdity cannot stop nihilistic tendendies of denial univeral forms of existence such as reason, morals, order and necessity. 

Keywords: Theatre of the Absurd, antiplay, philosophy of the absurd, destruction of the hero, uniqueness, universality, loss of meaning, nihilistic absurdity, existential absurdity, alogism

References:
Bekket S. V ozhidanii Godo. M.: «Tekst», 2015. 288 s.
Esslin M. Ezhen Ionesko. Teatr i antiteatr // Esslin M. Teatr absurda. Per. s angl. G. Kovalenko. SPb.: Baltiyskie sezony, 2010. S. 131—204.
Davydenko G.I. Istoriya zarubezhnoy literatury XX veka // http://uchebnikionline.ru/literatu/istoriya_zarubizhnoyi_literaturi_xx_stolittya_-_davidenko_gy/teatr_absurdu.htm
Kamyu A. Iz esse «Mif o Sizife» // Izbrannoe: Sb. / Per. s frants. S. Velikovskogo. M.: Raduga, 1989. S. 352-354.
Burenina O. Chto takoe absurd, ili Po sledam Martina Esslina // Absurd i vokrug: Sb. statey / Otv. red. O. Burenina. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoy kul'tury, 2004. S. 7-72.
Ionesko E. Lysaya pevitsa. M.: «Izvestiya», 1990. 224 s.
Lazareva E.Yu. Elementy teatra absurda v dramaturgii N. Kolyady // Vestnik VGU. Seriya. Filologiya. Zhurnalistika. ¹ 2. S. 63-66.
Arto A. Frantsuzskiy teatr ishchet mif // Kak vsegda – ob avangarde: Antologiya frantsuzskogo teatral'nogo avangarda. M.: TPF «Soyuzteatr», izdatel'stvo «Gitis», 1992. S. 59-77.
Dyushen I. Teatr paradoksa // Teatr paradoksa (Ionesko, Bekket i dr.). M., 1991. S. 5-21.
Pigulevskiy V.O. Ironiya i vymysel: ot romantizma k postmodernizmu. Rostov-na-Donu: «Foliant», 2002. 418 s.
Ionesko E. Nosorog. P'esy i rasskazy. M.: «Tekst», 1991. 271 s.

References (transliteration):
Bekket S. V ozhidanii Godo. M.: «Tekst», 2015. 288 s.
Esslin M. Ezhen Ionesko. Teatr i antiteatr // Esslin M. Teatr absurda. Per. s angl. G. Kovalenko. SPb.: Baltiyskie sezony, 2010. S. 131—204.
Davydenko G.I. Istoriya zarubezhnoy literatury XX veka // http://uchebnikionline.ru/literatu/istoriya_zarubizhnoyi_literaturi_xx_stolittya_-_davidenko_gy/teatr_absurdu.htm
Kamyu A. Iz esse «Mif o Sizife» // Izbrannoe: Sb. / Per. s frants. S. Velikovskogo. M.: Raduga, 1989. S. 352-354.
Burenina O. Chto takoe absurd, ili Po sledam Martina Esslina // Absurd i vokrug: Sb. statey / Otv. red. O. Burenina. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoy kul'tury, 2004. S. 7-72.
Ionesko E. Lysaya pevitsa. M.: «Izvestiya», 1990. 224 s.
Lazareva E.Yu. Elementy teatra absurda v dramaturgii N. Kolyady // Vestnik VGU. Seriya. Filologiya. Zhurnalistika. ¹ 2. S. 63-66.
Arto A. Frantsuzskiy teatr ishchet mif // Kak vsegda – ob avangarde: Antologiya frantsuzskogo teatral'nogo avangarda. M.: TPF «Soyuzteatr», izdatel'stvo «Gitis», 1992. S. 59-77.
Dyushen I. Teatr paradoksa // Teatr paradoksa (Ionesko, Bekket i dr.). M., 1991. S. 5-21.
Pigulevskiy V.O. Ironiya i vymysel: ot romantizma k postmodernizmu. Rostov-na-Donu: «Foliant», 2002. 418 s.
Ionesko E. Nosorog. P'esy i rasskazy. M.: «Tekst», 1991. 271 s.

Abstract: The subject of the present article is the phenomenon of transgression in the first philosophical work of Friedrich Nietzsche - "The Birth of Tragedy". The author investigates the ontological aspects of such basic concepts of the teaching of young Nietzsche as Dionysian and Apollonian beginnings. The author of the article explicates the ontological content of the phenomena of culture, art and science in the interpretation of Nietzsche. He also reveals the place and role of the phenomenon of transgression in the being of culture and existence of human. The author also conducts a comparative analysis of certain provisions of "The Birth of Tragedy" with the ideas of Georg Hegel and Mikhail Bakhtin. In his research Faritov has used research methods adopted from contemporary non-classical philosophy and social sciences. Partially he has applied the methodological principles of Jungian paradigm. The main conclusion of the research is the thesis about the subordinate position of the Dionysian transgression to Apollonian beginning in art and culture. The author proves the thesis that young Nietzsche did not unequivocally state the priority of the Dionysian to the Apollonian. In his "The Birth of Tragedy" Nietzsche speaks as a philosopher of culture and art, and the Dionysian beginning is admitted as much as it can be transformed by the enlightening force of Apollonian art images and thus integrated into the culture.

Keywords: Nietzsche, Apollonian, Dionysian, science, culture, art, transgression, The Birth of Tragedy, border, enantiodromia

References:
Jenks Ch. Transgression / Ch. Jenks. – London; New York: Routledge, 2003. – vii+205 p.
Zherebin A.I. Zagadka velikogo razryva. K antropologii dekadansa v knige Nitsshe «Chelovecheskoe, slishkom chelovecheskoe» // Voprosy filosofii. – 2015. – ¹ 2. – S. 162-168.
Podoroga V. Vyrazhenie i smysl. Landshaftnye miry filosofii: Seren Kirkegor, Fridrikh Nitsshe, Martin Khaydegger, Marsel' Prust, Frants Kafka / V. Podoroga. M.: Ad Marginem, 1995. – 427 s.
Faritov V.T. Perspektivizm Nitsshe, filosofskaya teoriya diskursa i transgressiya // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2015. – ¹ 7. – S.962-968. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2015.7.14895
Nitsshe F. Rozhdenie tragedii // Polnoe sobranie sochineniy: V 13 tomakh. T. 1/1: Rozhdenie tragedii. Iz naslediya 1869-1873 godov / F. Nitsshe. – M.: Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya, 2012. – S. 7-145.
Nietzsche F. Die Geburt der Tragödie // Digitale Kritische Gesamtausgabe Werke und Brief [Elektronnyy resurs]: Nietzsche Source. URL: http://www.nietzschesource.org/#eKGWB/NF-1886,7 (data obrashcheniya: 26.10.15)
Yung K.G. Votan // Bozhestvennyy rebenok / K.G. Yung. – M.: Olimp, 1997. – 400 s.
Sloterdayk P. Myslitel' na stsene. Materializm Nitsshe // Rozhdenie tragedii / F. Nitsshe. – M.: Ad Marginem, 2001. – S. 547-724.
Shopengauer A. Mir kak volya i predstavlenie / A. Shopengauer. – Minsk: OOO «Popurri», 1998. – T. 1-2. – 688+832 s.
Gegel' G.V.F. Nauka logiki / G.F.V. Gegel'. – SPb.: Nauka, 2005. – 800 s.
Duden Deutsshes Universalwörtebuch / hrsg. und bearb. vom Wissenschaftlichen Rat und den Mitarbeitern der Dudenredaktion. – Mannheim; Leipzig; Wien; Zürich; Dudenverl., 1996.
Khaydegger M. Bytie i vremya / M. Khaydegger. – Khar'kov: «Folio», 2003. – 503 s.
Nitsshe F. Ob istine i lzhi vo vnenravstvennom smysle // Polnoe sobranie sochineniy: V 13 tomakh. T. 1/2: Nesvoevremennye razmyshleniya. Iz naslediya 1872-1873 gg. / F. Nitsshe. – M.: Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya, 2013. – S. 433-449.
Nitsshe F. Chernoviki i nabroski 1887-1889 gg. // Polnoe sobranie sochineniy: V 13 tomakh. T. 13 / F. Nitsshe. – M.: Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya, 2006. – 688 s.
Gegel' G.V.F. Estetika: V 2 t. T. II / G.F.V. Gegel'. – SPb.: Nauka, 2007. – 604 s.
Gaym R. Gegel' i ego vremya / R. Gaym. – SPb.: Nauka, 2006. – 394 s.
Gegel' G.V.F. Estetika: V 2 t. T. I / G.F.V. Gegel'. – SPb.: Nauka, 2007. – 623 s.
Batay Zh. Proklyataya chast'. Sakral'naya sotsiologiya / Zh. Batay. – M.: Ladomir, 2006. – 742 s.
Yung K.G. Psikhologiya bessoznatel'nogo / K.G. Yung. – M.: AST; Kanon+, 2001. – 400 s.
Yung K.G. Psikhologicheskie tipy / K.G. Yung. – M.: Olimp; AST, 1998. – 720 s.
Mochkin A.N. Mif i politika v «Rozhdenii tragedii» F. Nitsshe / Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2015.– ¹ 7 (91). – S. 1017-1028. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2015.7.13068
Nitsshe F. Tak govoril Zaratustra. Kniga dlya vsekh i ni dlya kogo // Polnoe sobranie sochineniy: V 13 tomakh. T. 4: Tak govoril Zaratustra. Kniga dlya vsekh i ni dlya kogo / F. Nitsshe. – M.: Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya, 2007. – 432 s.
Nitsshe F. Dionisiyskoe mirovozzrenie // Polnoe sobranie sochineniy: V 13 tomakh. T. 1/1: Rozhdenie tragedii. Iz naslediya 1869-1873 godov / F. Nitsshe. – M.: Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya, 2012. – S. 201-227.
Bakhtin M. Problemy poetiki Dostoevskogo / M. Bakhtin. – M.: Sovetskaya Rossiya, 1979. – 320 s.
Nitsshe F. Pis'ma / Sost. I.A. Ebanoidze. – M.: Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya, 2007. – 400 s.
Ivanov V.I. Nitsshe i Dionis // Nitsshe: pro et contra / Sost. Yu.V. Sineokaya. – SPb.: RKhGI, 2001. – S. 794-805.
Faritov V.T. Transgressiya v filosofii Gegelya: ot Gegelya k Nitsshe // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2015. - 6. - C. 818 - 829. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2015.6.15303.

References (transliteration):
Jenks Ch. Transgression / Ch. Jenks. – London; New York: Routledge, 2003. – vii+205 p.
Zherebin A.I. Zagadka velikogo razryva. K antropologii dekadansa v knige Nitsshe «Chelovecheskoe, slishkom chelovecheskoe» // Voprosy filosofii. – 2015. – ¹ 2. – S. 162-168.
Podoroga V. Vyrazhenie i smysl. Landshaftnye miry filosofii: Seren Kirkegor, Fridrikh Nitsshe, Martin Khaydegger, Marsel' Prust, Frants Kafka / V. Podoroga. M.: Ad Marginem, 1995. – 427 s.
Faritov V.T. Perspektivizm Nitsshe, filosofskaya teoriya diskursa i transgressiya // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2015. – ¹ 7. – S.962-968. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2015.7.14895
Nitsshe F. Rozhdenie tragedii // Polnoe sobranie sochineniy: V 13 tomakh. T. 1/1: Rozhdenie tragedii. Iz naslediya 1869-1873 godov / F. Nitsshe. – M.: Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya, 2012. – S. 7-145.
Nietzsche F. Die Geburt der Tragödie // Digitale Kritische Gesamtausgabe Werke und Brief [Elektronnyy resurs]: Nietzsche Source. URL: http://www.nietzschesource.org/#eKGWB/NF-1886,7 (data obrashcheniya: 26.10.15)
Yung K.G. Votan // Bozhestvennyy rebenok / K.G. Yung. – M.: Olimp, 1997. – 400 s.
Sloterdayk P. Myslitel' na stsene. Materializm Nitsshe // Rozhdenie tragedii / F. Nitsshe. – M.: Ad Marginem, 2001. – S. 547-724.
Shopengauer A. Mir kak volya i predstavlenie / A. Shopengauer. – Minsk: OOO «Popurri», 1998. – T. 1-2. – 688+832 s.
Gegel' G.V.F. Nauka logiki / G.F.V. Gegel'. – SPb.: Nauka, 2005. – 800 s.
Duden Deutsshes Universalwörtebuch / hrsg. und bearb. vom Wissenschaftlichen Rat und den Mitarbeitern der Dudenredaktion. – Mannheim; Leipzig; Wien; Zürich; Dudenverl., 1996.
Khaydegger M. Bytie i vremya / M. Khaydegger. – Khar'kov: «Folio», 2003. – 503 s.
Nitsshe F. Ob istine i lzhi vo vnenravstvennom smysle // Polnoe sobranie sochineniy: V 13 tomakh. T. 1/2: Nesvoevremennye razmyshleniya. Iz naslediya 1872-1873 gg. / F. Nitsshe. – M.: Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya, 2013. – S. 433-449.
Nitsshe F. Chernoviki i nabroski 1887-1889 gg. // Polnoe sobranie sochineniy: V 13 tomakh. T. 13 / F. Nitsshe. – M.: Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya, 2006. – 688 s.
Gegel' G.V.F. Estetika: V 2 t. T. II / G.F.V. Gegel'. – SPb.: Nauka, 2007. – 604 s.
Gaym R. Gegel' i ego vremya / R. Gaym. – SPb.: Nauka, 2006. – 394 s.
Gegel' G.V.F. Estetika: V 2 t. T. I / G.F.V. Gegel'. – SPb.: Nauka, 2007. – 623 s.
Batay Zh. Proklyataya chast'. Sakral'naya sotsiologiya / Zh. Batay. – M.: Ladomir, 2006. – 742 s.
Yung K.G. Psikhologiya bessoznatel'nogo / K.G. Yung. – M.: AST; Kanon+, 2001. – 400 s.
Yung K.G. Psikhologicheskie tipy / K.G. Yung. – M.: Olimp; AST, 1998. – 720 s.
Mochkin A.N. Mif i politika v «Rozhdenii tragedii» F. Nitsshe / Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2015.– ¹ 7 (91). – S. 1017-1028. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2015.7.13068
Nitsshe F. Tak govoril Zaratustra. Kniga dlya vsekh i ni dlya kogo // Polnoe sobranie sochineniy: V 13 tomakh. T. 4: Tak govoril Zaratustra. Kniga dlya vsekh i ni dlya kogo / F. Nitsshe. – M.: Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya, 2007. – 432 s.
Nitsshe F. Dionisiyskoe mirovozzrenie // Polnoe sobranie sochineniy: V 13 tomakh. T. 1/1: Rozhdenie tragedii. Iz naslediya 1869-1873 godov / F. Nitsshe. – M.: Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya, 2012. – S. 201-227.
Bakhtin M. Problemy poetiki Dostoevskogo / M. Bakhtin. – M.: Sovetskaya Rossiya, 1979. – 320 s.
Nitsshe F. Pis'ma / Sost. I.A. Ebanoidze. – M.: Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya, 2007. – 400 s.
Ivanov V.I. Nitsshe i Dionis // Nitsshe: pro et contra / Sost. Yu.V. Sineokaya. – SPb.: RKhGI, 2001. – S. 794-805.
Faritov V.T. Transgressiya v filosofii Gegelya: ot Gegelya k Nitsshe // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2015. - 6. - C. 818 - 829. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2015.6.15303.

Abstract: The subject of the present research article is the phenomenon of agon (competition principle) from the point of view of the culture-historical approach. In particular, the author studies the dependence of the competition principle on the ancient archaic mythology as well as peculiarities of the Olympic religion that had been created thereupon. As the implementation of the competition principle in socio-cultural environment, the Greco-Roman agon tradition is being viewed from the point of view of socio-economic and political peculiarities of the ancient civilization, first of all, the key feature - ancient city-states called polises that had been created by the VIth century. The methodological basis of the research includes the method of ascent from the abstract to the concrete, the historicism principle and comparative analysis. The novelty and conclusions of the research are the following. As the implementation of the competition principle, agon appeared in the Greco-Roman tradition due to the peculiar nature of the ancient archaic myth and Olympic religion that eliminated dogmatized standards and regulation of individual behavior and therefore any limits of social activity. The motif of becoming a hero encouraged an individual to put forth super efforts towards free and honest competition for the purpose of achieving apotheosis. The absence of a developed thanatological aspect made an individual to try to achieve success in the sphere of the immanent. 

Keywords: regulation of individual behavior, traditions, Olympic religion, Greco-Roman myth, hero, archaic myth, competition, agon, dogmatized standards, social activity

References:
Kheyzinga Y. Xomo Ludens / Chelovek igrayushchiy. Stat'i po istorii kul'-tury / Y.Kheyzinga // Per. s niderlandskogo i sost. D.V. Sil'vestrova. – M.: Ayris-press, 2003. – 496 s.
Shanin Yu.V. Olimpiya. Istoriya antichnogo atletizma / Yu.V. Shanin. – SPb.: Aleteyya, 2001. – 191 s.
Losev A.F. Dialektika mifa / A.F. Losev. – SPb.: Azbuka, Azbuka-Atti¬kus, 2014. – 320 s.
Losev A.F. Istoriya Antichnoy estetiki. Itogi tysyacheletnego razvitiya / A.F. Losev. – V dvukh knigakh. – Kn. 2. – M.: «AST», 1994. – 608 s.
Bukkert V. Grecheskaya religiya: arkhaika i klassika / V. Bukkert.-Per s nem. M. Vitkovskoy i V. Vitkovskogo. – SPb.: Aleteyya, 2004. – 535 s.
Zaytsev A.I. Kul'turnyy perevorot v Drevney Gretsii VIII-V vv. do n.e. / A.I. Zaytsev // Pod red. L.Ya. Zhmudya. – 2-e izd., ispr. i pererab. – SPb: Filologicheskiy fakul'tet SPbGU, 2001. – 320 s.
Andreev Yu.V. Tsena svobody i garmonii: neskol'ko shtrikhov k portretu grecheskoy tsivilizatsii / Yu.V. Andreev. – SPb.: Aleteyya, 1998.-200 s.
Losev A.F. Filosofiya kul'tury / A.F. Losev. Derzanie dukha. – M.: Politizdat, 1988. – S. 218-237.

References (transliteration):
Kheyzinga Y. Xomo Ludens / Chelovek igrayushchiy. Stat'i po istorii kul'-tury / Y.Kheyzinga // Per. s niderlandskogo i sost. D.V. Sil'vestrova. – M.: Ayris-press, 2003. – 496 s.
Shanin Yu.V. Olimpiya. Istoriya antichnogo atletizma / Yu.V. Shanin. – SPb.: Aleteyya, 2001. – 191 s.
Losev A.F. Dialektika mifa / A.F. Losev. – SPb.: Azbuka, Azbuka-Atti¬kus, 2014. – 320 s.
Losev A.F. Istoriya Antichnoy estetiki. Itogi tysyacheletnego razvitiya / A.F. Losev. – V dvukh knigakh. – Kn. 2. – M.: «AST», 1994. – 608 s.
Bukkert V. Grecheskaya religiya: arkhaika i klassika / V. Bukkert.-Per s nem. M. Vitkovskoy i V. Vitkovskogo. – SPb.: Aleteyya, 2004. – 535 s.
Zaytsev A.I. Kul'turnyy perevorot v Drevney Gretsii VIII-V vv. do n.e. / A.I. Zaytsev // Pod red. L.Ya. Zhmudya. – 2-e izd., ispr. i pererab. – SPb: Filologicheskiy fakul'tet SPbGU, 2001. – 320 s.
Andreev Yu.V. Tsena svobody i garmonii: neskol'ko shtrikhov k portretu grecheskoy tsivilizatsii / Yu.V. Andreev. – SPb.: Aleteyya, 1998.-200 s.
Losev A.F. Filosofiya kul'tury / A.F. Losev. Derzanie dukha. – M.: Politizdat, 1988. – S. 218-237.

Abstract: The subject of the research is the question to what extent culture may reflect the life of Soul. Lately the soul has ceased to be the subject of philosophical reflection. This is due to the orientation of culture at the positivist version of science. It is assumed that in addition to religion, the life of Soul can be also manifested in arts but modern art, being released from traditional forms of culture (such as mystery and ritual), has lost touch with the metaphysical beginning. Philosophical understanding of the life of Soul has also changed. This has led to the confusion of the aesthetical beginning and art. Creation of the discipline called 'aesthetics' and untraditional division of institutions were a response to such confusion. The research method used by the author involves philosophical reflection of global processes ongoing in the modern civilization. Special attention is paid to the point of view of traditionalism. The novelty of the research is caused by the fact that the author offers to view the process of confusion of various principles and types of mentalities as a sign of degradation of human nature. The author stresses out that it is impossible to find the only cause of such degradation, however, according to the author, inversion of normal relations between the principles of Universal existence and destruction of the spiritual hierarchy have played an important role in this process. 

Keywords: tradition, spiritual hierarchy, aesthetics, art, life of the soul, universe, culture, scheme, information, energy

References:
Genon R. Zametki o posvyashchenii. M., 2010.
Genon R. Mnozhestvennye sostoyaniya bytiya. M., 2013.
Zhuvenel' B. de Vlast': estestvennaya istoriya ee vozrastaniya. M., 2011.
Kant I. Kritika chistogo razuma M., 1994.
Kant I. Kritika sposobnosti suzhdeniya. M., 1994.
Terens P. Kel'ty. Voiny i magi. M., 2012
Coomaraswamy A. Studies in Comparative Religion, Vol. 5, No. 3, 1971.

References (transliteration):
Genon R. Zametki o posvyashchenii. M., 2010.
Genon R. Mnozhestvennye sostoyaniya bytiya. M., 2013.
Zhuvenel' B. de Vlast': estestvennaya istoriya ee vozrastaniya. M., 2011.
Kant I. Kritika chistogo razuma M., 1994.
Kant I. Kritika sposobnosti suzhdeniya. M., 1994.
Terens P. Kel'ty. Voiny i magi. M., 2012
Coomaraswamy A. Studies in Comparative Religion, Vol. 5, No. 3, 1971.

Abstract: Based on the example of parallels between philosophical reflections in Maximilian Voloshin's poetry and world views of peoples speaking Nahua (Aztecs), the author of the article demonstrates the similarity and assonance of images and meanings that were created as a result of mythopoetic world perception, the learning style used by human along with the rational cognition. The analysis performed by the author demonstrates that there is neither a direct approach nor a possibility for adoption, following or imitation. At the same time, images and meanings that were created in cultures that had no actual points of coincidence in time or space happen to have very close contents and meanings. A number of general provisions is made by the author based on the comparative analysis of a number of sources, poetic texts and particular aspects of the world view. The examples provided prove that mythopoetics is still a cognitive structure, mostly due to its philosophical content. Mythopoetics is a form of existence and production of knowledge in poetic art forms which considerably contributes to the cross-cultural communication when understanding is the mean and the final goal of communication. 

Keywords: American Conquest, Maximilian Voloshin, Aztec philosophy, parallel meanings, understanding, cross-cultural communication, cultural dialogue, Mexican culture, Diego Rivera, Silver Age

References:
Moren E. Metod. Priroda Prirody. / perevod, vstupitel'naya stat'ya Knyazeva E.N.M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2005. 464 s.
Leon-Portil'ya M. Filosofiya nagua. Issledovanie istochnikov. 2-e izd., izm i dop. – per. s isp. R.Burgete, M.Burgete. M.: Postum, 2010. 480 s.
Leon-Portil'ya M. Filosofiya nagua. Issledovanie istochnikov. Per.s isp. I komment. R.Burgete. M.: Izd.Inostrannoy literatury, 1961. 384 s.
Krebel' I.A. Mifopoetika serebryanogo veka: Opyt topologicheskoy refleksii / I.A. Krebel'. SPb.: Aleteyya, 2010. 592.s.
Kupchenko V.P. Maksimilian Voloshin i Diego Rivera // Latinskaya Amerika. 1977. ¹2. S.182-186.
Kozolupenko D.P. Mifopoeticheskoe mirovospriyatie. M.: «Kanon+» ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», 2009. 432 s..
Voloshin M. Lyubov' – vsya zhizn'. Stikhotvoreniya. Perevody. Stat'i. Vospominaniya o Maksimiliane Voloshine. Izbrannoe / Sost., il., vstup. Sl., komment. N.M.Miroshnichenko. Simferopol', 2008. 368 s.; il. 16 s.
Voloshin Maksimilian. Stikhotvoreniya. /Vstupitel'naya stat'ya S.S. Narovchatova. Sostavlenie, podgotovka teksta i primechaniya L.A.Evstigneevoy. L.: Sovetskiy pisatel'. 1977. 464 s.
Bakhtin M.M. Chelovek v mire slova. /Sost., avt. predisl., s. 3-19 i primech. O. E. Ossovskiy. M. Izd-vo Ros. otkrytogo un-ta, 1995. 139,[1] s.
Makovskiy S. Portrety sovremennikov. Maksimilian Voloshin // Serebryanyy vek. Memuary. (Sbornik) / Sostavitel' T. Dubinskaya-Dzhalilova. M.: Izvestiya, 1990. S.146-159
Nalimov V.V. Spontannost' soznaniya . Veroyatnostnaya teoriya smyslov i smyslovaya arkhitektonika lichnosti. Izd. 3-e. M.: Akadamicheskiy proekt; paradigma, 2011. 399 s.
Nesaual'koyotl'. Izbrannaya lirika // Istoriki Dokolumbovoy Ameriki i Konkisty. Kniga pervaya. Fernando de Al'va Ishtltl'shochitl'. Khuan Bautista de Pomar / per.s isp. V.N.Talakha; pod red. V.A.Rubelya. K.: Lybid', 2013. – 504 s.
Ozerov L.Maksimilian Voloshin, uvidennyy ego sovremennikami // Vospominaniya o Maksimiliane Voloshine. http://voloshin.ouc.ru/vospominaniya-o-maksimiliane.html. data obrashcheniya 30.03.2015
Polevoy V.M. Iskusstvo stran Latinskoy Ameriki. M, «Iskusstvo», 1967. 324 s.
Sikeyros, D. menya nazyvali Likhim Polkovnikom: Vospominaniya. Per. s isp. M.: Politizdat, 1986. 414s., il.
Stepin V.S. Teoreticheskoe znanie.M.: Progress Traditsiya, 2000. 744 s.
Sustel' Zh. Povsednevnaya zhizn' atstekov nakanune ispanskogo zavoevaeiya / Zhak Sustel'; nauch. red. I vstup. St. G.G.Ershovoy; per. s fr. E.V. Kolodochkinoy. M.: Molodaya gvardiya, 2007. 287 [1] s.: il.

References (transliteration):
Moren E. Metod. Priroda Prirody. / perevod, vstupitel'naya stat'ya Knyazeva E.N.M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2005. 464 s.
Leon-Portil'ya M. Filosofiya nagua. Issledovanie istochnikov. 2-e izd., izm i dop. – per. s isp. R.Burgete, M.Burgete. M.: Postum, 2010. 480 s.
Leon-Portil'ya M. Filosofiya nagua. Issledovanie istochnikov. Per.s isp. I komment. R.Burgete. M.: Izd.Inostrannoy literatury, 1961. 384 s.
Krebel' I.A. Mifopoetika serebryanogo veka: Opyt topologicheskoy refleksii / I.A. Krebel'. SPb.: Aleteyya, 2010. 592.s.
Kupchenko V.P. Maksimilian Voloshin i Diego Rivera // Latinskaya Amerika. 1977. ¹2. S.182-186.
Kozolupenko D.P. Mifopoeticheskoe mirovospriyatie. M.: «Kanon+» ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», 2009. 432 s..
Voloshin M. Lyubov' – vsya zhizn'. Stikhotvoreniya. Perevody. Stat'i. Vospominaniya o Maksimiliane Voloshine. Izbrannoe / Sost., il., vstup. Sl., komment. N.M.Miroshnichenko. Simferopol', 2008. 368 s.; il. 16 s.
Voloshin Maksimilian. Stikhotvoreniya. /Vstupitel'naya stat'ya S.S. Narovchatova. Sostavlenie, podgotovka teksta i primechaniya L.A.Evstigneevoy. L.: Sovetskiy pisatel'. 1977. 464 s.
Bakhtin M.M. Chelovek v mire slova. /Sost., avt. predisl., s. 3-19 i primech. O. E. Ossovskiy. M. Izd-vo Ros. otkrytogo un-ta, 1995. 139,[1] s.
Makovskiy S. Portrety sovremennikov. Maksimilian Voloshin // Serebryanyy vek. Memuary. (Sbornik) / Sostavitel' T. Dubinskaya-Dzhalilova. M.: Izvestiya, 1990. S.146-159
Nalimov V.V. Spontannost' soznaniya . Veroyatnostnaya teoriya smyslov i smyslovaya arkhitektonika lichnosti. Izd. 3-e. M.: Akadamicheskiy proekt; paradigma, 2011. 399 s.
Nesaual'koyotl'. Izbrannaya lirika // Istoriki Dokolumbovoy Ameriki i Konkisty. Kniga pervaya. Fernando de Al'va Ishtltl'shochitl'. Khuan Bautista de Pomar / per.s isp. V.N.Talakha; pod red. V.A.Rubelya. K.: Lybid', 2013. – 504 s.
Ozerov L.Maksimilian Voloshin, uvidennyy ego sovremennikami // Vospominaniya o Maksimiliane Voloshine. http://voloshin.ouc.ru/vospominaniya-o-maksimiliane.html. data obrashcheniya 30.03.2015
Polevoy V.M. Iskusstvo stran Latinskoy Ameriki. M, «Iskusstvo», 1967. 324 s.
Sikeyros, D. menya nazyvali Likhim Polkovnikom: Vospominaniya. Per. s isp. M.: Politizdat, 1986. 414s., il.
Stepin V.S. Teoreticheskoe znanie.M.: Progress Traditsiya, 2000. 744 s.
Sustel' Zh. Povsednevnaya zhizn' atstekov nakanune ispanskogo zavoevaeiya / Zhak Sustel'; nauch. red. I vstup. St. G.G.Ershovoy; per. s fr. E.V. Kolodochkinoy. M.: Molodaya gvardiya, 2007. 287 [1] s.: il.

Abstract: The reason for writing this article was read by the author C. M. Rosina "Logic and methodology: From "Analyst" of Aristotle to the "Logical-philosophical treatise" L. Wittgenstein". The article is written as a detailed analytical review to this book. The main theme of the last - methodology coming from the Moscow methodological circle. Rozin involved in the expression and justification of "methodological position" as "thinking about thinking". To do this, he examines in detail the contexts of European traditions (and their characters), which finds significant for understanding the methodology of the moments of occurrence of "thinking about thinking". One of these contexts is modern European culture - modern. Framework Rozin has the place of birth of methodology in modern dance. But Rosina is no theory of modernity, such a theory which would link the logic of modernity and the logic of the methodology. This affects the content of his conversation with a different kind of "amethodology": "ones", "scientists", "phanomenologie", "worldly esoteric". Methodology in this conversation can't go with the lines of the opposition itself, as a philosophical position, other positions. My suggestion is to get to talk about the relationship of philosophical positions with the socio-cultural systems. In this case, we must construct a theory of modernity as development and implementation in the form of socio-cultural systems of a certain ideological strategy. The modern appears strategic adversaries and allies. The methodology will have to take a place among the allies and will be able to speak in the name of modernity. So we will be able to develop a specific theory of modernity, and certain communication methodology with modern. An important point in this development should be a "dialectics of modernity" as its accentuation on different (and opposite) principles. Because the methodology can be seen dialectical scheme endless open world, then this scheme should be seen as a basic circuit of the modernism at a certain phase of its deployment. The development of these and other important topics related to bollywood and methodology, is the content of the article.

Keywords: objective reality, technique, liberalism, science, secular spirituality, modern, dialectics, methodology, logic, phenomenology

References:
Rozin V.M. Logika i metodologiya: Ot «Analitik» Aristotelya k «Logiko-filosofskomu traktatu» L.Vitgenshteyna. – M.: LENAND, 2014.
Belyaev V.A. Posyustoronnyaya ezoterika. — M.: Knizhnyy dom «LIBROKOM», 2010. — 240 s. — ISBN 978-5-397-01025-2
Belyaev V.A. Proekty pokoreniya cheloveka protiv proekta pokoreniya prirody: K rekonstruktsii novoevropeyskoy ratsional'nosti. — M.: KRASAND, 2011. — 208 s. — ISBN 978-5-396-00278-4
Belyaev V.A. Metodologiya MMK (Moskovskiy metodologicheskiy kruzhok): Nauka i ezoterika. — M.: Knizhnyy dom «LIBROKOM», 2012. — 176 s. — ISBN 978-5-397-02579-9
Belyaev V.A. Kritika interkul'turnogo razuma: Analiz tsennostnoy struktury novoevropeyskogo mira. — M.: Knizhnyy dom «LIBROKOM», 2012. —288 s. — ISBN 978-5-397-02967-4
Belyaev V.A. Kul'turnaya interkul'turnaya metodologiya. — M.: Knizhnyy dom «LIBROKOM», 2013. — 176 s. — ISBN 978-5-397-03883-6
Belyaev V.A. Interkul'tura i filosofiya. — M.: LENAND, 2014. —336 s. — ISBN 978-5-9710-0872-9
Belyaev V.A. Konstruiruem modern. Postkul'turnyy i interkul'turnyy aspekty. Proektno-sistemnyy podkhod. — M.: LENAND, 2015. —400 s.

References (transliteration):
Rozin V.M. Logika i metodologiya: Ot «Analitik» Aristotelya k «Logiko-filosofskomu traktatu» L.Vitgenshteyna. – M.: LENAND, 2014.
Belyaev V.A. Posyustoronnyaya ezoterika. — M.: Knizhnyy dom «LIBROKOM», 2010. — 240 s. — ISBN 978-5-397-01025-2
Belyaev V.A. Proekty pokoreniya cheloveka protiv proekta pokoreniya prirody: K rekonstruktsii novoevropeyskoy ratsional'nosti. — M.: KRASAND, 2011. — 208 s. — ISBN 978-5-396-00278-4
Belyaev V.A. Metodologiya MMK (Moskovskiy metodologicheskiy kruzhok): Nauka i ezoterika. — M.: Knizhnyy dom «LIBROKOM», 2012. — 176 s. — ISBN 978-5-397-02579-9
Belyaev V.A. Kritika interkul'turnogo razuma: Analiz tsennostnoy struktury novoevropeyskogo mira. — M.: Knizhnyy dom «LIBROKOM», 2012. —288 s. — ISBN 978-5-397-02967-4
Belyaev V.A. Kul'turnaya interkul'turnaya metodologiya. — M.: Knizhnyy dom «LIBROKOM», 2013. — 176 s. — ISBN 978-5-397-03883-6
Belyaev V.A. Interkul'tura i filosofiya. — M.: LENAND, 2014. —336 s. — ISBN 978-5-9710-0872-9
Belyaev V.A. Konstruiruem modern. Postkul'turnyy i interkul'turnyy aspekty. Proektno-sistemnyy podkhod. — M.: LENAND, 2015. —400 s.

Abstract: The reason for writing this article was the reading of S. M. Rozin’s “Logic and methodology: From “Analyst” of Aristotle to the “Logical-philosophical treatise” of L. Wittgenstein”. The article is written as a detailed analytical review to this book. The main theme of the latter is the methodology coming from the Moscow methodological circle. Rozin involved in the expression and justification of “methodological position” as “thinking about thinking”. To do this, he examines in detail the contexts of European traditions (and their characters), which finds significant for understanding the methodology of the moments of occurrence of “thinking about thinking”. Framework of Rozin’s theory has the place of birth of methodology in modern dance. But Rosin’s theory is not the theory of modernity, this is the theory that would link the logic of modernity and the logic of the methodology. This affects the content of his conversation with a different kind of “amethodology”: “ones”, “scientists”, “phanomenologie”, “worldly esoteric”. Methodology in this conversation can’t go with the lines of the opposition itself, as a philosophical position, other positions. The author’s suggestion is to get to talk about the relationship between philosophical positions and socio-cultural systems. In this case, we must construct a theory of modernity as development and implementation in the form of socio-cultural systems of a certain ideological strategy. The modern appears strategic adversaries and allies. The methodology will have to take a place among the allies and will be able to speak in the name of modernity. So we will be able to develop a specific theory of modernity, and certain communication methodology with modern. An important point in this development should be a “dialectics of modernity” as its accentuation on different (and opposite) principles. Because the methodology can be seen as a dialectical scheme of the endless open world, this scheme should be seen as a basic circuit of modernism at a certain phase of its deployment. The development of these and other important topics related to modernism and methodology constitutes the content of the article.

Keywords: Logic, methodology, dialectics, modern, secular spirituality, science, liberalism, technique, objective reality, phenomenology.

References:
Rozin V.M. Logika i metodologiya: Ot «Analitik» Aristotelya k «Logiko-filosofskomu traktatu» L.Vitgenshteyna. – M.: LENAND, 2014.
Belyaev V.A. Posyustoronnyaya ezoterika. — M.: Knizhnyy dom «LIBROKOM», 2010. — 240 s. — ISBN 978-5-397-01025-2
Belyaev V.A. Proekty pokoreniya cheloveka protiv proekta pokoreniya prirody: K rekonstruktsii no-voevropeyskoy ratsional'nosti. — M.: KRASAND, 2011. — 208 s. — ISBN 978-5-396-00278-4
Belyaev V.A. Metodologiya MMK (Moskovskiy metodologicheskiy kruzhok): Nauka i ezoterika. — M.: Knizhnyy dom «LIBROKOM», 2012. — 176 s. — ISBN 978-5-397-02579-9
Belyaev V.A. Kritika interkul'turnogo razuma: Analiz tsennostnoy struktury novoevropeyskogo mira. — M.: Knizhnyy dom «LIBROKOM», 2012. —288 s. — ISBN 978-5-397-02967-4
Belyaev V.A. Kul'turnaya interkul'turnaya metodologiya. — M.: Knizhnyy dom «LIBROKOM», 2013. — 176 s. — ISBN 978-5-397-03883-6
Belyaev V.A. Interkul'tura i filosofiya. — M.: LENAND, 2014. —336 s. — ISBN 978-5-9710-0872-9
Belyaev V.A. Konstruiruem modern. Postkul'turnyy i interkul'turnyy aspekty. Proektno-sistemnyy podkhod. — M.: LENAND, 2015. —400 s.

References (transliteration):
Rozin V.M. Logika i metodologiya: Ot «Analitik» Aristotelya k «Logiko-filosofskomu traktatu» L.Vitgenshteyna. – M.: LENAND, 2014.
Belyaev V.A. Posyustoronnyaya ezoterika. — M.: Knizhnyy dom «LIBROKOM», 2010. — 240 s. — ISBN 978-5-397-01025-2
Belyaev V.A. Proekty pokoreniya cheloveka protiv proekta pokoreniya prirody: K rekonstruktsii no-voevropeyskoy ratsional'nosti. — M.: KRASAND, 2011. — 208 s. — ISBN 978-5-396-00278-4
Belyaev V.A. Metodologiya MMK (Moskovskiy metodologicheskiy kruzhok): Nauka i ezoterika. — M.: Knizhnyy dom «LIBROKOM», 2012. — 176 s. — ISBN 978-5-397-02579-9
Belyaev V.A. Kritika interkul'turnogo razuma: Analiz tsennostnoy struktury novoevropeyskogo mira. — M.: Knizhnyy dom «LIBROKOM», 2012. —288 s. — ISBN 978-5-397-02967-4
Belyaev V.A. Kul'turnaya interkul'turnaya metodologiya. — M.: Knizhnyy dom «LIBROKOM», 2013. — 176 s. — ISBN 978-5-397-03883-6
Belyaev V.A. Interkul'tura i filosofiya. — M.: LENAND, 2014. —336 s. — ISBN 978-5-9710-0872-9
Belyaev V.A. Konstruiruem modern. Postkul'turnyy i interkul'turnyy aspekty. Proektno-sistemnyy podkhod. — M.: LENAND, 2015. —400 s.

Abstract: When analyzing Lermontov’s creative work, the author of the article focuses on repetitions often used by Lermontov. Such repetitions allowed Lermontov to discover the opportunities of conceptual changes, to change his story lines and demonstrate the life of things and heroes. The results of the analysis of the three poems written by Lermontov (Confession, Boyarin Orsha and the Novice) prove that these poems constitute a single chain of Lermontov’s thoughts on uttermost possibilities of not only human soul but also the thinking ability in general, the topic that was so popular in the European philosophy of those times. Confession and judgment were the main concepts discussed by Lermontov in those three poems. The author of the present article also examines the ‘repetition’ of Lermontov’s topics in Jonathan Littell’s ‘The Kindly Ones’. The article was written based on the methods of the comparative and situation analysis. In addition, the author has performed the problematization of repetition and equation. The topics discussed by Lermontov grow especially important today as a result of social automization and absolute, i.e. metaphysical but not romantic or sentimental, loneliness that allows to look at the world from the outside but at the same time makes it inaccessible despite its visual accessibility. According to the author, it is useless to analyze the form of verses and the number of syllables in iambs and etc.

Keywords: Repeat, repetition, confession, silence, contemplation, freedom, prison, Nazism, meaning, equivocality, hermeneutics.

References:
Platon. Parmenid // Platon. Soch.: V 3-kh t. T. 3 (1). M.: Mysl', 1972.
Neretina S.S. Tochki na zrenii. SPb., 2006.
Delez Zh. Razlichie i povtorenie. SPb., 1998.
Lermontov M.Yu. Soch.: V 4-kh t. T. 1-4. M., 1957.
Tarn Aleks. Geroy nashego vremeni. Zametki o romane Dzh.Littella «Blagovolitel'nitsy» // Zametki po evreyskoy istorii (http://berkovich-zametki.com).
Pavlovskiy G. 1993. Elementy sovetskogo opyta. Razgovory s Mikhailom Gefterom. M., 2014.
Batay Zh. Proklyataya chast': Sakral'naya sotsiologiya / Per. E.D.Gal'tsovoy. M., 2006.

References (transliteration):
Platon. Parmenid // Platon. Soch.: V 3-kh t. T. 3 (1). M.: Mysl', 1972.
Neretina S.S. Tochki na zrenii. SPb., 2006.
Delez Zh. Razlichie i povtorenie. SPb., 1998.
Lermontov M.Yu. Soch.: V 4-kh t. T. 1-4. M., 1957.
Tarn Aleks. Geroy nashego vremeni. Zametki o romane Dzh.Littella «Blagovolitel'nitsy» // Zametki po evreyskoy istorii (http://berkovich-zametki.com).
Pavlovskiy G. 1993. Elementy sovetskogo opyta. Razgovory s Mikhailom Gefterom. M., 2014.
Batay Zh. Proklyataya chast': Sakral'naya sotsiologiya / Per. E.D.Gal'tsovoy. M., 2006.

Abstract: The main goal of the present research article is to draw a portrait of Art Nouveau in terms of the developing project of post culture (the logic of the ‘criticism of culture’ in terms of the ‘culture – individual’ relation). The author defines post culture (or ‘differentiave culture’) as a type of socio-cultural construction that views differentiation (individuation) of the anthropological universum as the main process. By contrast, ‘culture’ (‘integrative culture’) has the priority to integrate an individual into the global community. The author views the process of post culture development starting from the period of Enlightenment, in particular, Kant’s critical philosophy when the project of ‘pure post culture’ was offered. The author views the periods ‘before’ and ‘after’ that are viewed by the author as the logical movement towards it and the logical creation of alternatives thereto respectively. The author’s model of the development of modernistic views is based on a philosophical plan. At the same time, the author tries to show how the evolution of modernistic intentions was expressed in art (mostly in fine arts). The author starts his discussion from comparing the negative portraits of ‘integrative culture’ and ‘differentiative culture’ in art. Then he goes to the logic of the positive project of post culture offered by Kant. Based on Kant’s concept as the starting point, the author describes the movement towards it and the attempt to apply it during the Great French revolution as well as the development of ‘cultural alternatives’ to Kant’s post culture including the classical Hegelian and non-classical Marxian theories. Analyzing the 20th century as the period when post-modern was created based on the criticism of the general European post-cultural victory after the First World War, the author proceeds to the discussion of ‘modernity’ and ‘interculturality’ (the logic of the development of the ‘criticism of culture’ is shown in terms of the ‘culture-culture’ relation). The author also touches upon the historical period when there were various attempts to restore the ‘cultural’ socio-cultural structure (cultural remissions). The most significant examples of the latter were social and political concepts of communism and fascism. A special focus is made on the development of the image of a ‘modern’, i.e. post cultural artist (man of art). Tracing back the logic of its development from the Romantic period till the end of the 20th century, the author shows that its structure was defined by the sensual-individual direction of post culture. At the end of his research the author analyzes V. Rozin’s position on modern art and artist expressed in his article ‘Reflections on Modern Art’.

Keywords: Post culture, inter culture, modern, Art Nouveau, Enlightenment, artist, differentiative art, integrative art, post-modern, counter-modern, art.

References:
«Vechnyy fashizm» v iskusstve. Tekst anonimnogo avtora. URL: http://cargocollective.com/nullmagazine#VECNYI-FASIZM (na 10.07.2014)
Kant I. Ideya vseobshchey istorii vo vsemirno-grazhdanskom plane // Sochineniya v shesti tomakh. T. 6. M. 1966.
Kant I. K vechnomu miru // Sochineniya v shesti tomakh. T. 6. M. 1966.
Kant I. Metafizika nravov // Sochineniya v shesti tomakh. T. 4. Ch. 2. M. 1965.
Rozin V.M.. Razmyshlenie o sovremennom iskusstve // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. – 2014. – ¹ 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2014.1.11908.
Belyaev V.A. Kritika interkul'turnogo razuma: analiz tsennostnoy struktury novoevropeyskogo mira. M.: Knizhnyy dom «LIBROKOM», 2012.
Belyaev V.A. K rekonstruktsii novoevropeyskoy ratsional'nosti: proekty pokoreniya cheloveka protiv proekta pokoreniya prirody. M.: KRASAND, 2011.
Belyaev V.A. Interkul'tura i filosofiya. M.: LENAND, 2014.
Belyaev V.A. K idee interkul'tury // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. — 2013.-¹ 5.-S.309-346. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.5.443. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_443.html
Belyaev V.A. Interkul'tura po–preimushchestvu // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. — 2013.-¹ 6.-S.475-513. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.6.588. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_588.html
Belyaev V.A. Krizis interkul'tury i kul'turnye remissii // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. — 2013.-¹ 7.-S.580-617. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.7.557. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_557.html
Belyaev V.A. Kritika religioznogo razuma Yu.Khabermasa kak chast' kritiki kul'turnogo razuma // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. — 2014.-¹ 1.-S.20-64. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2014.1.10709. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_10709.html
Belyaev V.A. Konstruiruem kriticheskuyu filosofiyu I.Kanta kak «filosofskuyu reformatsiyu» i «kritiku kul'turnogo razuma» // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. — 2014.-¹ 3.-S.60-99. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2014.3.11222. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_11222.html
Belyaev V.A. Konstruiruem modern kak sistemu antropologicheskikh proektov // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. — 2014.-¹ 4.-S.92-197. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2014.4.11772. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_11772.html
Belyaev V.A. Vyuchila li religiya urok moderna? K voprosu o pozitsii religioznogo cheloveka v postsekulyarnom mire // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. — 2014.-¹ 1.-S.68-79. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2014.1.11948
Belyaev V.A. Modernistskaya «kritika kul'tury» i dialektika «kul'turnogo-postkul'turnogo-interkul'turnogo» // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. — 2014.-¹ 5.-S.90-178. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2014.5.12355. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_12355.html

References (transliteration):
«Vechnyy fashizm» v iskusstve. Tekst anonimnogo avtora. URL: http://cargocollective.com/nullmagazine#VECNYI-FASIZM (na 10.07.2014)
Kant I. Ideya vseobshchey istorii vo vsemirno-grazhdanskom plane // Sochineniya v shesti tomakh. T. 6. M. 1966.
Kant I. K vechnomu miru // Sochineniya v shesti tomakh. T. 6. M. 1966.
Kant I. Metafizika nravov // Sochineniya v shesti tomakh. T. 4. Ch. 2. M. 1965.
Rozin V.M.. Razmyshlenie o sovremennom iskusstve // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. – 2014. – ¹ 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2014.1.11908.
Belyaev V.A. Kritika interkul'turnogo razuma: analiz tsennostnoy struktury novoevropeyskogo mira. M.: Knizhnyy dom «LIBROKOM», 2012.
Belyaev V.A. K rekonstruktsii novoevropeyskoy ratsional'nosti: proekty pokoreniya cheloveka protiv proekta pokoreniya prirody. M.: KRASAND, 2011.
Belyaev V.A. Interkul'tura i filosofiya. M.: LENAND, 2014.
Belyaev V.A. K idee interkul'tury // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. — 2013.-¹ 5.-S.309-346. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.5.443. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_443.html
Belyaev V.A. Interkul'tura po–preimushchestvu // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. — 2013.-¹ 6.-S.475-513. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.6.588. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_588.html
Belyaev V.A. Krizis interkul'tury i kul'turnye remissii // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. — 2013.-¹ 7.-S.580-617. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.7.557. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_557.html
Belyaev V.A. Kritika religioznogo razuma Yu.Khabermasa kak chast' kritiki kul'turnogo razuma // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. — 2014.-¹ 1.-S.20-64. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2014.1.10709. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_10709.html
Belyaev V.A. Konstruiruem kriticheskuyu filosofiyu I.Kanta kak «filosofskuyu reformatsiyu» i «kritiku kul'turnogo razuma» // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. — 2014.-¹ 3.-S.60-99. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2014.3.11222. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_11222.html
Belyaev V.A. Konstruiruem modern kak sistemu antropologicheskikh proektov // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. — 2014.-¹ 4.-S.92-197. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2014.4.11772. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_11772.html
Belyaev V.A. Vyuchila li religiya urok moderna? K voprosu o pozitsii religioznogo cheloveka v postsekulyarnom mire // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. — 2014.-¹ 1.-S.68-79. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2014.1.11948
Belyaev V.A. Modernistskaya «kritika kul'tury» i dialektika «kul'turnogo-postkul'turnogo-interkul'turnogo» // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. — 2014.-¹ 5.-S.90-178. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2014.5.12355. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_12355.html

Abstract: The two approaches can be distinguished to discussing Plato’s ‘Symposium’. According to the first approach, in Socrates’ speech Plato shared his point of view of love (eros). According to the second approach, each participant of the symposium makes his own contribution to the development of the definition of love. The author of the present article keeps to the second approach and tries to show that in his ‘Symposium’ Plato presented his concept of love (eros) dialectically, i.e. as a part of the development of different or differently expressed ideas. Plato’s views on love are described on the basis of, first of all, analytical comparison of different definitions of love offered in different speeches and discovery of conceptual similarities and secondly, a potential comparison of the contents of ‘Symposium’ with Aristotle’s teaching about philia and New Testament teaching about agape that view love as one’s attitude towards the other compared to one’s attitude to himself and one’s attitude to supreme forces. Plato’s concept of love includes both the program of self-improvement in love and the ideal of human relations (which Socrates did not touch upon in his speech). The latter is clearly shown in Alcibiades’ speech who came back to the question about relations between lovers following Socrates’ erotosophia and showed what the best of such relations could be. From the point of view of the discourse, Alcibiades’ speech was the converging point between Socrates’ speech and speeches of other participants of the dispute. Alcibiades’ speech provided for the intellectual synthesis as the framework for developing Plato’s concept of love (eros).

Keywords: Love (eros), Plato, Symposium, philosophy of love, love (philia), love (agape), definitions of love, love and blessing, perfection, communication.

References:
Aristotel'. Evdemova etika / Per. s dr.gpech. T.V. Vasil'evoy, T.A. Miller, M.A. Solopovoy. M.: IF RAN, 2005.
Diogen Laertsiy. O zhizni, ucheniyakh i izrecheniyakh znamenitykh filosofov / Per. M. L. Gasparova; red. A.F. Losev. M.: Mysl', 1986
Ksenofont. Pir // Ksenofont. Sokraticheskie sochineniya. SPb.: Komplekt, 1993.
Losev A.F. Istoriya antichnoy estetiki. T. 2: Sofisty. Sokrat. Platon. M.: Folio, 2000.
Losev A.F. Eros u Platona [1916] // Losev A.F. Filosofiya. Mifologiya. Kul'tura / Sost. Yu.A. Rostovtsev; Vstupit. st. A.A. Takho-Godi. M.: Politizdat, 1990.
Lukach D. Svoeobrazie esteticheskogo / Per. s nem.; pod obshch. red. K.M. Dolgova. T. 4. M.: Progress, 1987.
Mify narodov mira: Entsiklopediya / Gl. red. S.A. Tokarev. 2-e izd. T. 1. M.: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya, 1987.
Platon. Apologiya Sokrata (24s) // Platon. Sobr. soch. V 4 t. T. 1. M.: Mysl', 1990.
Platon. Pir / Per. S.K. Apta // Platon. Soch. v 4 t. : T. 2 / Pod obshch. red. A.F. Loseva, V.F. Asmusa, A.A. Takho-Godi. M.: Mysl', 1993.
Rozin V.M. Vvedenie v skhemologiyu : Skhemy v filosofii, kul'ture, nauke, proektirovanii. M.: Librokom, 2011.
Rozin V.M. Predposylki i osobennosti antichnoy kul'tury. M.: IF RAN, 2004.
Fuko M. Ispol'zovanie udovol'stviy. Istoriya seksual'nosti / Per. s frants. V. Kapluna. T. 2. SPb.: Akademicheskiy proekt, 2004.
Cummins W.J. «Eros», «Epithumia», and «Philia» in Plato // Apeiron: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science. 1981. Vol. 15. ¹ 1.
Dover K.J. Aristophanes' Speech in Plato's Symposium // The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 1966. Vol. 86.
Evans N. Diotima and Demeter as Mystagogues in Plato’s Symposium // Hypatia. 2006. Vol. 21. ¹ 2. P. 1–27.
Ferguson J. Moral Values in the Ancient World. London: Methuen & Co, 1958.
Hyland D.A. ῎Ερως, ᾿Επιθυμία, and Φιλία in Plato // Phronesis, 1968. Vol. 13. ¹ 1.
Irwin T. Plato's Moral Theory : The Early and Middle Dialogues. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985.
Kosman L.A. Platonic Love // Phronesis Supplementary. Vol. 2 : Facets of Plato's Philosophy / Ed. W.H. Werkmeister. P. 61. Amsterdam: Van Gorcum, 1976.
Levy D. The Definition of Love in Plato's Symposium // Journal of the History of Ideas. 1979. Vol. 40. ¹ 2.
Metcalf R. The Trial of Socrates in Plato’s Symposium // Epoché. 2009. Vol. 14. ¹ 1.
Nails D. The People of Plato : A Prosopography of Plato and Other Socratics. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc., 2002.
Nussbaum M. The Fragility of Goodness : Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy / Revised Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
Nye A. The Subject of Love: Diotima And Her Critics // Journal of Value Inquiry. 1990. Vol. 24. ¹ 2.
Schindler D.C. Plato and the Problem of Love: On the Nature of Eros in the «Symposium» // Apeiron: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science. 2007. Vol. 40. ¹ 3.
Strauss L. On Plato’s Symposium [1959] / Ed., and with a foreword by Seth Benardete. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2001.
Vlastos G. The Individual as Object of Love in Plato's Dialogues // Vlastos G. The Philosophy of Socrates: a Collection of Critical Essays. NY: Garden City, 1971.
Weil S. Intimations of Christianity Among the Ancient Greeks. Beacon: Beacon Press, 1958. R. 124.

References (transliteration):
Aristotel'. Evdemova etika / Per. s dr.gpech. T.V. Vasil'evoy, T.A. Miller, M.A. Solopovoy. M.: IF RAN, 2005.
Diogen Laertsiy. O zhizni, ucheniyakh i izrecheniyakh znamenitykh filosofov / Per. M. L. Gasparova; red. A.F. Losev. M.: Mysl', 1986
Ksenofont. Pir // Ksenofont. Sokraticheskie sochineniya. SPb.: Komplekt, 1993.
Losev A.F. Istoriya antichnoy estetiki. T. 2: Sofisty. Sokrat. Platon. M.: Folio, 2000.
Losev A.F. Eros u Platona [1916] // Losev A.F. Filosofiya. Mifologiya. Kul'tura / Sost. Yu.A. Rostovtsev; Vstupit. st. A.A. Takho-Godi. M.: Politizdat, 1990.
Lukach D. Svoeobrazie esteticheskogo / Per. s nem.; pod obshch. red. K.M. Dolgova. T. 4. M.: Progress, 1987.
Mify narodov mira: Entsiklopediya / Gl. red. S.A. Tokarev. 2-e izd. T. 1. M.: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya, 1987.
Platon. Apologiya Sokrata (24s) // Platon. Sobr. soch. V 4 t. T. 1. M.: Mysl', 1990.
Platon. Pir / Per. S.K. Apta // Platon. Soch. v 4 t. : T. 2 / Pod obshch. red. A.F. Loseva, V.F. Asmusa, A.A. Takho-Godi. M.: Mysl', 1993.
Rozin V.M. Vvedenie v skhemologiyu : Skhemy v filosofii, kul'ture, nauke, proektirovanii. M.: Librokom, 2011.
Rozin V.M. Predposylki i osobennosti antichnoy kul'tury. M.: IF RAN, 2004.
Fuko M. Ispol'zovanie udovol'stviy. Istoriya seksual'nosti / Per. s frants. V. Kapluna. T. 2. SPb.: Akademicheskiy proekt, 2004.
Cummins W.J. «Eros», «Epithumia», and «Philia» in Plato // Apeiron: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science. 1981. Vol. 15. ¹ 1.
Dover K.J. Aristophanes' Speech in Plato's Symposium // The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 1966. Vol. 86.
Evans N. Diotima and Demeter as Mystagogues in Plato’s Symposium // Hypatia. 2006. Vol. 21. ¹ 2. P. 1–27.
Ferguson J. Moral Values in the Ancient World. London: Methuen & Co, 1958.
Hyland D.A. ῎Ερως, ᾿Επιθυμία, and Φιλία in Plato // Phronesis, 1968. Vol. 13. ¹ 1.
Irwin T. Plato's Moral Theory : The Early and Middle Dialogues. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985.
Kosman L.A. Platonic Love // Phronesis Supplementary. Vol. 2 : Facets of Plato's Philosophy / Ed. W.H. Werkmeister. P. 61. Amsterdam: Van Gorcum, 1976.
Levy D. The Definition of Love in Plato's Symposium // Journal of the History of Ideas. 1979. Vol. 40. ¹ 2.
Metcalf R. The Trial of Socrates in Plato’s Symposium // Epoché. 2009. Vol. 14. ¹ 1.
Nails D. The People of Plato : A Prosopography of Plato and Other Socratics. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc., 2002.
Nussbaum M. The Fragility of Goodness : Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy / Revised Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
Nye A. The Subject of Love: Diotima And Her Critics // Journal of Value Inquiry. 1990. Vol. 24. ¹ 2.
Schindler D.C. Plato and the Problem of Love: On the Nature of Eros in the «Symposium» // Apeiron: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science. 2007. Vol. 40. ¹ 3.
Strauss L. On Plato’s Symposium [1959] / Ed., and with a foreword by Seth Benardete. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2001.
Vlastos G. The Individual as Object of Love in Plato's Dialogues // Vlastos G. The Philosophy of Socrates: a Collection of Critical Essays. NY: Garden City, 1971.
Weil S. Intimations of Christianity Among the Ancient Greeks. Beacon: Beacon Press, 1958. R. 124.

Abstract: The researcher analyzes the concepts of creative work in Martin Heidegger’s and Pavel Florensky’s works. S. Smirnov shows that these two philosophers had rather close views on ontology. Martin Heidegger understood the process of art creation as the idea of a man withdrawing himself from what was ontologically hidden to the light of being. Creative work was associated with ontology and the loss of roots and contact with ontology could turn art into the process of simple form creation and techno into a plain posture. A man himself becomes a living bearer of a particular form of a world, a ‘sign’ and an ‘indicator’ of such a world of creation. Florensky based his idea of man’s creative work or ‘non-organic physicality’ on his concept of ‘organ projection’. Both philosophers viewed creative work as a concept referring to such concepts as organ projection, Techne and human existence and therefore intertwined art with ontology. The researcher carries out the ontological analysis of the basic concepts in Martin Heidegger’s and Pavel Florensky’s works and describes the idea of creative work based on ontological grounds of the aforesaid concepts based on such terms as Techne, posture, the hidden, the non-hidden, creative work, organ projection and energy body. The researcher also offers a description of the genesis of a piece of work that is beyond the scope of esthetics or art studies. The problem of creative work is posed as an ontological problem or a problem of non-classical anthropology when a man himself becomes the organ of being and forms his own energy body and becomes a creative work himself leaving his trace in tools, texts and artifacts. Therefore, based on classical works, the author offers a non-classical vision of the genesis of creative work.

Keywords: Creative work, hidden, non-hidden, Techne, technology, energy body, personality, human, anthropology, poetic anthropology.

Contact information: Smirnov Sergey Alevtinovich, 630099, Russia, Novosibirsk, ul. Kamenskaya, d. 56, NSUEM

References:
Veysman A.D. Grechesko-russkiy slovar'. Reprint V-go izdaniya 1899 g. – M.: Greko-latinskiy kabinet Yu.A.Shichalina, 1991.
Vygotskiy L.S. Problema soznaniya. // Vygotskiy L.S. Sobranie sochine-niy: V 6-ti t. – T. 1. – M.: Pedagogika, 1982. – S. 156 – 167.
Vygotskiy L.S. Problema razvitiya v strukturnoy psikhologii. // Vygot-skiy L.S. Sobranie sochineniy: V 6-ti t. – T. 1. – M.: Pedagogika, 1982. – S. 238 – 290.
Dvoretskiy I.Kh. Latinsko-russkiy slovar'. – M.: Russkiy yazyk, 1976. – 1096 s.
Zinchenko V.P. Ot klassicheskoy k organicheskoy psikhologii. – M., 1996. – 80 c.
Zinchenko V.P. Gipoteza o proiskhozhdenii ucheniya A.A.Ukhtomskogo o do-minante. // Chelovek. – 2000. – ¹ 3. – S. 5-20.
Platon Sobranie sochineniy v 4 t. – T. 2 / Obshch. red. A.F.Loseva, V.F.Asmusa, A.A.Takho-Godi; Primech. A.F.Loseva i A.A.Takho-Godi; Per. s drevne-grech. – M.: Mysl', 1993. – 528 s.
Smirnov S.A. Kul'turnyy vozrast cheloveka. Filosofskoe vvedenie v psikhologiyu razvitiya. – Novosibirsk: Ofset, 2001. – 161s.
Smirnov S.A. Avtopoezis cheloveka. Filosofskie ocherki po antropolo-gii stikha. – Novosibirsk: Ofset, 2011. – 389 c.
Smirnov S.A. Novye identichnosti cheloveka: analiz i prognoz antropo-logicheskikh trendov. Antropologicheskiy forsayt. // Vestnik NGUEU. – 2013. – ¹ 1. – S. 216-241.
Smirnov S.A. Vvedenie v antropopoetiku. Opyt neklassicheskogo antro-pologicheskogo diskursa. // Chelovek. – 2013. – ¹ 6. – S.5-17.
Smirnov S.A. Struktura akta avtopoezisa. Opyt poeticheskoy antropolo-gii. // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. 2014. ¹ 2. – S. 171-182.
Ukhtomskiy A.A. Izbrannye trudy. – L.: Nauka, 1978.
Florenskiy P.A. Stolp i utverzhdenie istiny. – M.: Izd-vo «Pravda», 1990.
Florenskiy P.A. U vodorazdelov mysli. – M.: Pravda, 1990. – 448 s.
Florenskiy P.A. U vodorazdelov mysli. // Simvol. – Parizh. – 1992. – ¹28. – S. 123-216.
Fuko M. Germenevtika sub'ekta: Kurs lektsiy, prochitannykh v Kollezh de Frans v 1981 – 1982 uchebnom godu / M.Fuko; Per. s fr. A.G.Pogonyaylo. – SPb.: Nauka, 2007. – 677 s.
Khaydegger M. Razgovor na proselochnoy doroge: Sbornik: Per. s nem. / Pod red. A.L. Dobrokhotova. – M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1991. – 192 s.
Khaydegger M. Vremya i bytie: Stat'i i vystupleniya: Per. s nem. – M.: Respublika, 1993. – 447 s.
Khaydegger M. Raboty i razmyshleniya raznykh let. Per. s nem. / Sostavl.. perevody, vstup. st., primech. A.V.Mikhaylova. – M.: Gnozis, 1993. – 464 s.
Khaydegger M. Chto zovetsya myshleniem? / Per. s nem. E.Sagetdinova. Izd. 2-e. – M.: Akademicheskiy proekt, 2010.
Khoruzhiy S.S. K fenomenologii askezy. – M.: Izd-vo gumanitarnoy li-teratury, 1998. – 352 s.
Khoruzhiy S.S. Ocherki sinergiynoy antropologii. – M.: Institut filo-sofii, teologii i istorii sv. Fomy, 2005. – 408 s.
Sheler M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya: Per. s nem. / Per. Denezhkina A.V., Malinkina A.N., Filippova A.F.; Pod red. Denezhkina A.V. – M.: Izd-vo «Gno-zis», 1994. – 490 s.
I.V. Egorova Antropologicheskiy renessans // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2011. - 8. - C. 18 - 28.
V.A. Kutyrev Rekonstruktsiya cheloveka // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2010. - 1. - C. 61 - 66.
S. V. Chernov O tvorcheskom naznachenii cheloveka. // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2011. - 1. - C. 41 - 49.

References (transliteration):
Veysman A.D. Grechesko-russkiy slovar'. Reprint V-go izdaniya 1899 g. – M.: Greko-latinskiy kabinet Yu.A.Shichalina, 1991.
Vygotskiy L.S. Problema soznaniya. // Vygotskiy L.S. Sobranie sochine-niy: V 6-ti t. – T. 1. – M.: Pedagogika, 1982. – S. 156 – 167.
Vygotskiy L.S. Problema razvitiya v strukturnoy psikhologii. // Vygot-skiy L.S. Sobranie sochineniy: V 6-ti t. – T. 1. – M.: Pedagogika, 1982. – S. 238 – 290.
Dvoretskiy I.Kh. Latinsko-russkiy slovar'. – M.: Russkiy yazyk, 1976. – 1096 s.
Zinchenko V.P. Ot klassicheskoy k organicheskoy psikhologii. – M., 1996. – 80 c.
Zinchenko V.P. Gipoteza o proiskhozhdenii ucheniya A.A.Ukhtomskogo o do-minante. // Chelovek. – 2000. – ¹ 3. – S. 5-20.
Platon Sobranie sochineniy v 4 t. – T. 2 / Obshch. red. A.F.Loseva, V.F.Asmusa, A.A.Takho-Godi; Primech. A.F.Loseva i A.A.Takho-Godi; Per. s drevne-grech. – M.: Mysl', 1993. – 528 s.
Smirnov S.A. Kul'turnyy vozrast cheloveka. Filosofskoe vvedenie v psikhologiyu razvitiya. – Novosibirsk: Ofset, 2001. – 161s.
Smirnov S.A. Avtopoezis cheloveka. Filosofskie ocherki po antropolo-gii stikha. – Novosibirsk: Ofset, 2011. – 389 c.
Smirnov S.A. Novye identichnosti cheloveka: analiz i prognoz antropo-logicheskikh trendov. Antropologicheskiy forsayt. // Vestnik NGUEU. – 2013. – ¹ 1. – S. 216-241.
Smirnov S.A. Vvedenie v antropopoetiku. Opyt neklassicheskogo antro-pologicheskogo diskursa. // Chelovek. – 2013. – ¹ 6. – S.5-17.
Smirnov S.A. Struktura akta avtopoezisa. Opyt poeticheskoy antropolo-gii. // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. 2014. ¹ 2. – S. 171-182.
Ukhtomskiy A.A. Izbrannye trudy. – L.: Nauka, 1978.
Florenskiy P.A. Stolp i utverzhdenie istiny. – M.: Izd-vo «Pravda», 1990.
Florenskiy P.A. U vodorazdelov mysli. – M.: Pravda, 1990. – 448 s.
Florenskiy P.A. U vodorazdelov mysli. // Simvol. – Parizh. – 1992. – ¹28. – S. 123-216.
Fuko M. Germenevtika sub'ekta: Kurs lektsiy, prochitannykh v Kollezh de Frans v 1981 – 1982 uchebnom godu / M.Fuko; Per. s fr. A.G.Pogonyaylo. – SPb.: Nauka, 2007. – 677 s.
Khaydegger M. Razgovor na proselochnoy doroge: Sbornik: Per. s nem. / Pod red. A.L. Dobrokhotova. – M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1991. – 192 s.
Khaydegger M. Vremya i bytie: Stat'i i vystupleniya: Per. s nem. – M.: Respublika, 1993. – 447 s.
Khaydegger M. Raboty i razmyshleniya raznykh let. Per. s nem. / Sostavl.. perevody, vstup. st., primech. A.V.Mikhaylova. – M.: Gnozis, 1993. – 464 s.
Khaydegger M. Chto zovetsya myshleniem? / Per. s nem. E.Sagetdinova. Izd. 2-e. – M.: Akademicheskiy proekt, 2010.
Khoruzhiy S.S. K fenomenologii askezy. – M.: Izd-vo gumanitarnoy li-teratury, 1998. – 352 s.
Khoruzhiy S.S. Ocherki sinergiynoy antropologii. – M.: Institut filo-sofii, teologii i istorii sv. Fomy, 2005. – 408 s.
Sheler M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya: Per. s nem. / Per. Denezhkina A.V., Malinkina A.N., Filippova A.F.; Pod red. Denezhkina A.V. – M.: Izd-vo «Gno-zis», 1994. – 490 s.
I.V. Egorova Antropologicheskiy renessans // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2011. - 8. - C. 18 - 28.
V.A. Kutyrev Rekonstruktsiya cheloveka // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2010. - 1. - C. 61 - 66.
S. V. Chernov O tvorcheskom naznachenii cheloveka. // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2011. - 1. - C. 41 - 49.

Abstract: The author of the present research article disproves of Fedyor Dostoevsky’s appraisal of Pushkin’s poem ‘Piligrim’ after the novel of an English writer and preacher John Bunyan ‘The Piligrim’s Progress’ that Dostoevsy shared during his ‘speech devoted to Pushkin’ on June 8, 1880. Dostoevsky interpreted Pushkin as an ideologist of the empire, church, religious nation and Russian roots. From this point of view, his speech devoted to Pushkin was an ‘anti-Pushkin’ speech that actually distorted Pushkin’s word of values. The author of the present article proves that in his poem Pushkin did not create the image of a religious Protestant but based on English cultural works Pushkin created the image of a typical Orthodox person with a slavish philosophy of life and hysterical way of believing. ‘Piligrim’ does not have any signs of Pushkin’s universal narodnichestvo (populism). In this poem Pushkin created the Russian poetry. The researcher uses a comparative socio-cultural analysis of Pushkin’s and Dostoevsky’s writings and also compared to the two types of religion, Orthodoxy and Protestantism. For the first time in the studies of Dostoevsky the researcher proves the failure of Dostoevsky’s point of view on Pushkin’s ‘Piligrim’ based on the comparative analysis of Orthodox and Protestant values. Therefore the conclusion about Dostoevsky distorting the meaning of ‘Piligrim’ can be considered to proved. This allows to progress in our understanding of the speech devoted to Pushkin as an objectively anti-Pushkin speech.

Keywords: Dostoevsky, Pushkin, poem ‘Piligrim’, Orthodoxy, Protestantism, prayer, purpose of art, purpose of poetry, God, salvation.

Abstract: Modern music is very different from the traditional music that was the part of the ritual and had a metaphysical meaning. Today music is oriented at virtuosity and sentimentality. In traditional music human is seen as a metaphysical creature. The unity of the microcosmos and macrocosmos is an important idea of traditional cultures. Therefore the essence of music can be understood on the basis of that metaphysical idea. Symbols related to the themes of perfection, immortality, life and death are typical for traditional culture and help to understand music as metaphysics. Comparison of multi-level cultural layers is carried out by the means of the method of interpretation of symbolic figures. Plato’s idea of the cosmic world structure is taken as an initial symbol that helps to reveal the metaphysical essence of music. Music is not only art from the esthetic point of view. Music also has metaphysical purposes. For example, from the anthropological point of view music helps to restore numerous connections with the all-encompassing Universe. Throughout history art has been always changing its status and function. However, in modern culture music practically loses its metaphysical meaning which it used to have in traditional culture.

Keywords: Music, culture, time, Zoroastrianism, information, Universe, tradition, metaphysics, immortality, beautiful.

Abstract: The article is devoted to the description of the phenomenon of a poetic expression as a special object action. For this purpose the author offers a new definition of the structure of poetical works as the autopoiesis act. Based on the creative work of Osip Mandelstam (in particular, his poems and ‘Conversation about Dante’) the researcher provides an analysis of the phenomenon of the poetical composition. The author offers a definition of autopoiesis as a model the entire act of the poetical composition is based on. The autopoiesis act itself is described by the researcher as an object action. The article was written at the confluence of poetics and anthropology. Research methodology is based on the introduction of terms from poetic anthropology as a branch of human philosophy into cultural practices of creating literary texts. The research is based on the principles and terms adopted from anthropology as an anthropopractice, in particular, understanding of the autopoiesis act as an object action aimed at generation and transformation of human based on creating an artwork. The novelty of research is attributed to the introduction of the model of autopoiesis based on which the author analyzes the phenomenon of a poetical composition from the point of view of a particular cultural practice and object action. For the first time the author offers the definition and description of the structure of the autopoiesis act. The research article was written within the framework of a new direction of interdisciplinary research – anthropopoetics that involve research and description of arts as anthropopractices of human transformation.

Keywords: autopoiesis, structure of the autopoiesis act, anthropology of autopoiesis, creative act, object action, generative model, anthropopractice, ontology of poiesis, energy of the autopoiesis act, inner form.

Abstract: the article examines the challenges that classic Opera faces in the “post-cultural ” era, in which postmodern cultural traits (fragmentation, cultural pluralism, loss of history sense) become dominant in artistic culture. The author draws attention to the temporal issue of Opera, which is viewed as a correlation of time of the plot and the time of the viewer/listener. On the example of the modern “director’s opera” practice, the author demonstrates that liberal treatment towards the temporal aspect of the plot is not always justified and thus calls for close attention to all aspects of the play, lest it destroys the Opera ’s stylistic integrity. The author formulates several types of temporal structures and their possible interpretations, accenting archetypical images, which were subject to research on numerous occasions. The author shows the correlation between the interpretation of classic images, urging to preserve the traditional cultural values and to reject modernization for the sake of modernization alone.

Keywords: culturology, art, classics, postculture, postmodernism, opera, interpretation, temporality, modernization, plot.

Contact information: Shapinskaya Ekaterina Nikolaevna, 119072, Russian Federation, Moscow, Bersenevskaya Naberezhnaya, 18-20-22, building 3.

References:
1. Adorno T. Vvedenie v sotsiologiyu muzyki. Universitetskaya kniga. M. – Spb, 1999.
2. Giddens E. Transformatsiya intimnosti. Seksual'nost', lyubov' i erotizm v sovremennykh obshche-
stvakh. M.-SPb, Piter, 2004
3. Zlotnikova T.S. Esteticheskie paradoksy rezhissury: Rossiya, KhKh vek. Yaroslavl', 2012
4. Kamyu A. Buntuyushchiy chelovek. M., Izd-vo politicheskoy literatury, 1990.
5. Lauri-Vol'pi Dzh. Parallel'nye golosa. M.. Agraf, 2011
6. Said E.V Kul'tura i imperializm. Sankt-Peterburg, «Vladimir Dal'», 2012.
7. Samokhvalova V.I. Bezobraznoe: Razmyshleniya o ego prirode, sushchnosti i meste v mire. M.: Bris-M.,
2012.
8. Tito Gobbi. Mir ital'yanskoy opery. M., Raduga, 1989
9. Fuks E. Illyustrirovannaya istoriya nravov. Galantnyy vek. M.. Respublika, 1994.
10. Shapinskaya E.N. Diskurs lyubvi. M., Prometey, 1997.
11. Clark K. Civilisation. A Personal View. NY, Harper and Row, 1969.
12. Luhman N. Love as Passion. Cambridge-Oxford, Polity Press, 1986.
13. Jameson, F. Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. L.-NY, 1991
14. Riding A., Dunton-Downer L. Opera. Penguin, L.-NY, 2006.

References (transliteration):
1. Adorno T. Vvedenie v sotsiologiyu muzyki. Universitetskaya kniga. M. – Spb, 1999.
2. Giddens E. Transformatsiya intimnosti. Seksual'nost', lyubov' i erotizm v sovremennykh obshche-
stvakh. M.-SPb, Piter, 2004
3. Zlotnikova T.S. Esteticheskie paradoksy rezhissury: Rossiya, KhKh vek. Yaroslavl', 2012
4. Kamyu A. Buntuyushchiy chelovek. M., Izd-vo politicheskoy literatury, 1990.
5. Lauri-Vol'pi Dzh. Parallel'nye golosa. M.. Agraf, 2011
6. Said E.V Kul'tura i imperializm. Sankt-Peterburg, «Vladimir Dal'», 2012.
7. Samokhvalova V.I. Bezobraznoe: Razmyshleniya o ego prirode, sushchnosti i meste v mire. M.: Bris-M.,
2012.
8. Tito Gobbi. Mir ital'yanskoy opery. M., Raduga, 1989
9. Fuks E. Illyustrirovannaya istoriya nravov. Galantnyy vek. M.. Respublika, 1994.
10. Shapinskaya E.N. Diskurs lyubvi. M., Prometey, 1997.
11. Clark K. Civilisation. A Personal View. NY, Harper and Row, 1969.
12. Luhman N. Love as Passion. Cambridge-Oxford, Polity Press, 1986.
13. Jameson, F. Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. L.-NY, 1991
14. Riding A., Dunton-Downer L. Opera. Penguin, L.-NY, 2006.

Abstract: The author of the article discusses the role of symbolism as an art movement in Russian art at the turn of XXth century. Symbolism is viewed as the creation of the epoch of the Russian empire collapse and thus, the author underlines the following features of symbolism: symbolism demonstrates the gap in continuity of generations; the opposition between anthropomorphic and disanthropomorphic tendencies, between humanitarian and natural scientifi c spheres. The latter creates the gap between ‘fathers’ and ‘children’. ‘Fathers’ are viewed as positivists and ‘children’ – symbolists demonstrate their escaping into mystics, theosophy, mythology, Gnosticism and Christian personalism. It makes symbolists resemble romantics and therefore symbolism is often said to be the neoromanticism. Continuing the opposition between Art Nouveau and romanticism in XX, symbolists adopted and developed the romantic tradition.

Keywords: cultural research, empire collapse, continuity of generations, alternative culture, anthropomorphism, disanthropomorphism, personalism, rationalism, precognition, myth.

Contact information: KHRENOV Nikolay Andreevich, 125009, Russia, Moscow, Kozitsky per., 5.

References:
1. Belyy A. Na rubezhe dvukh stoletiy. M., 1989.
2. Belyy A. Nachalo veka. M., 1990.
3. Belyy A. Rudol'f Shteyner i Gete v mirovozzrenii sovremennosti. Vospominaniya o Shteynere. M., 2000.
4. Belyy A. Simvolizm kak miroponimanie. M., 1994.
5. Berdyaev N. Filosofiya svobody. Smysl tvorchestva. M., 1989.
6. Berdyaev N. Novoe religioznoe soznanie i obshchestvennost'. M., 1999.
7. Blauberg I. Anri Bergson. M., 2003.
8. Veber A. Izbrannoe: Krizis evropeyskoy kul'tury. SPb., 1999.
9. Gaydenko P. Vladimir Solov'ev i filosofiya Serebryanogo veka. M., 2001.
10. Gaym R. Gegel' i ego vremya. SPb., 2006.
11. Gaym R. Romanticheskaya shkola. Vklad v istoriyu nemetskogo uma. SPb., 2006.
12. Zedl'mayr Kh. Utrata serediny. M., 2008.
13. Ivanov V. Rodnoe i vselenskoe. M., 1994.
14. Kozyrev A. Solov'ev i gnostiki. M., 2007.
15. Losev A. Vladimir Solov'ev i ego vremya. M., 1990.
16. Losev A. Istoriya antichnoy estetiki. Itogi tysyacheletnego razvitiya. T. 1. M., 1992.
17. Lukach D. Svoeobrazie esteticheskogo. T. 1. M., 1985.
18. Markov V. Istoriya russkogo futurizma. SPb., 2000.
19. Merezhkovskiy D. L. Tolstoy i Dostoevskiy. Vechnye sputniki. M., 1995.
20. Sakulin P. Romantizm i «neoromantizm» // Vestnik Evropy. Petrograd. 1915. ¹ 3.
21. Trubetskoy E. Mirosozertsanie V. S. Solov'eva. T. 1. M., 1995.
22. Khanzen-Leve A. Russkiy simvolizm. Sistema poeticheskikh motivov. Ranniy simvolizm. SPb., 1999.
23. Khrenov N. Smena pokoleniy v granitsakh kul'tury moderna: nadezhdy, illyuzii, real'nost' // Pokolenie
v sotsiokul'turnom kontekste KhKh veka. M., 2005.
24. Khrenov N. Khudozhestvennaya kul'tura epokhi nadloma imperii v tsivilizatsionnom kontekste // Iskusstvo
epokhi nadloma imperii: religioznye, natsional'nye i filosofsko-esteticheskie aspekty. M., 2010.
25. Etkind A. Khlyst. Sekty, literatura i revolyutsiya. M., 1998.
26. Yaspers K. Nitsshe. Vvedenie v ponimanie ego filosofstvovaniya. SPb., 2004.

References (transliteration):
1. Belyy A. Na rubezhe dvukh stoletiy. M., 1989.
2. Belyy A. Nachalo veka. M., 1990.
3. Belyy A. Rudol'f Shteyner i Gete v mirovozzrenii sovremennosti. Vospominaniya o Shteynere. M., 2000.
4. Belyy A. Simvolizm kak miroponimanie. M., 1994.
5. Berdyaev N. Filosofiya svobody. Smysl tvorchestva. M., 1989.
6. Berdyaev N. Novoe religioznoe soznanie i obshchestvennost'. M., 1999.
7. Blauberg I. Anri Bergson. M., 2003.
8. Veber A. Izbrannoe: Krizis evropeyskoy kul'tury. SPb., 1999.
9. Gaydenko P. Vladimir Solov'ev i filosofiya Serebryanogo veka. M., 2001.
10. Gaym R. Gegel' i ego vremya. SPb., 2006.
11. Gaym R. Romanticheskaya shkola. Vklad v istoriyu nemetskogo uma. SPb., 2006.
12. Zedl'mayr Kh. Utrata serediny. M., 2008.
13. Ivanov V. Rodnoe i vselenskoe. M., 1994.
14. Kozyrev A. Solov'ev i gnostiki. M., 2007.
15. Losev A. Vladimir Solov'ev i ego vremya. M., 1990.
16. Losev A. Istoriya antichnoy estetiki. Itogi tysyacheletnego razvitiya. T. 1. M., 1992.
17. Lukach D. Svoeobrazie esteticheskogo. T. 1. M., 1985.
18. Markov V. Istoriya russkogo futurizma. SPb., 2000.
19. Merezhkovskiy D. L. Tolstoy i Dostoevskiy. Vechnye sputniki. M., 1995.
20. Sakulin P. Romantizm i «neoromantizm» // Vestnik Evropy. Petrograd. 1915. ¹ 3.
21. Trubetskoy E. Mirosozertsanie V. S. Solov'eva. T. 1. M., 1995.
22. Khanzen-Leve A. Russkiy simvolizm. Sistema poeticheskikh motivov. Ranniy simvolizm. SPb., 1999.
23. Khrenov N. Smena pokoleniy v granitsakh kul'tury moderna: nadezhdy, illyuzii, real'nost' // Pokolenie
v sotsiokul'turnom kontekste KhKh veka. M., 2005.
24. Khrenov N. Khudozhestvennaya kul'tura epokhi nadloma imperii v tsivilizatsionnom kontekste // Iskusstvo
epokhi nadloma imperii: religioznye, natsional'nye i filosofsko-esteticheskie aspekty. M., 2010.
25. Etkind A. Khlyst. Sekty, literatura i revolyutsiya. M., 1998.
26. Yaspers K. Nitsshe. Vvedenie v ponimanie ego filosofstvovaniya. SPb., 2004.

Abstract: The article provides a description of several bright Russian philosophers of the modern times who can be also called modern Westerners. It is shown that in their creative work the above mentioned philsophers manage to combine Western philosophical concepts with the traditional ideas of Russian philosophy. One of the brightest philosophers of the late Soviet era was Merab Mamardashvili. The most important Mamardashvili’s concept was the close connection betwee personality and the world: on one hand, world depends on personality and this is why classical rationality cannot be applied to it. On the other hand, personality must admit its dependence on the ‘divine dimension’ of the world. Vladimir Bibikhin proved that the main quality of personality is not isolation but opennness for the world. Based on that concept, Bibikin critisized Western civilization. Developing Friedrich Nietzsche’s and Oswald Spengler’s ideas, Karen Swassjan aso talked about incovertible crisis of Western culture. Just like Bibikhin he insisted that the crisis was caused by distortion of the Christian outlook which had happened in the history of church. The author also described creative development of another modern philospher and writer – Vladimir Kantor. Kantor viewed Russian history as the opposition between environmental powers and civilization. In his opinion, progressive development of Russia depends on gradual introduction of the concept of right into social life which would tame the power of people’s life and despotism of government.

Keywords: cultural studies, tradition, Westernism, Russian Philsophy, Merab Mamardashvili, Vladimir Bibikhin, Karen Swassjan, V. Kantor, Russia, Western Europe.

References:
1. Mamardashvili M. Kak ya ponimayu filosofiyu. M., 1992.
2. Mamardashvili M. Lektsii o Pruste (psikhologicheskaya topologiya puti). M., 1995.
3. Bibikhin V. V. Uznay sebya. SPb., 1998.
4. Bibikhin V. V. Novyy renessans. M., 1998.
5. Svas'yan K. A. Stanovlenie sovremennoy nauki. M., 2002.
6. Svas'yan K. A. Rossiya i demokratiya // Svas'yan K.A. Rastozhdestvleniya. M., 2006.
7. Kantor V. K. Sankt-Peterburg: Rossiyskaya imperiya protiv rossiyskogo khaosa. K probleme imperskogo
soznaniya v Rossii. M., 2008.

References (transliteration):
1. Mamardashvili M. Kak ya ponimayu filosofiyu. M., 1992.
2. Mamardashvili M. Lektsii o Pruste (psikhologicheskaya topologiya puti). M., 1995.
3. Bibikhin V. V. Uznay sebya. SPb., 1998.
4. Bibikhin V. V. Novyy renessans. M., 1998.
5. Svas'yan K. A. Stanovlenie sovremennoy nauki. M., 2002.
6. Svas'yan K. A. Rossiya i demokratiya // Svas'yan K.A. Rastozhdestvleniya. M., 2006.
7. Kantor V. K. Sankt-Peterburg: Rossiyskaya imperiya protiv rossiyskogo khaosa. K probleme imperskogo
soznaniya v Rossii. M., 2008.

Abstract: The author of the article has made an attemp to compare views on the Bible from the point of Indian and Russian philosophy in the 19th – 20th centuries. The common approach to Biblican texts that united such peoples as a philosopher and reformer Rammohan Roy, a priest, theologist and public fi gure Krisnamachar Banergee, philosopher Vla dimir Soliviet and a priest and theologist Alexander Men, viewed the Bible as something phenomenological and personal, something that was far from modern and traditional interpretations. These philosophers addressed to the Spirit of the Biblical legacy and it allowed them to achieve the synthesis of the national and universal, Western and Oriental, spiritual and slocial development of peoples and cultures as well as sensibility of every nation to general human values represented in the Biblican legacy.

Keywords: cultural stuies, philosophy, values, Bible, Christiniaity, culture, Christology, understanding, text, theology.

References:
1. Berdyaev N. A. Filosofiya tvorchestva, kul'tury i iskusstva: V 2-kh t. T. 2. M., 1994.
2. Dvadtsat' let bez ottsa Aleksandra. I s nim / Otv. red. E. B. Rashkovskiy. M., 2010.
3. Krasitskiy Ya. Bog, chelovek i zlo: Issledovanie filosofii Vladimira Solov'eva. M., 2009.
4. Zernov N. M. Russkoe religioznoe vozrozhdenie KhKh veka / Per. s angl. N. M. Zernova. Izd. 2-e, ispr. Paris, 1991.
5. Zernov N. M. Tri russkikh proroka: Khomyakov, Dostoevskiy, Solov'ev. SPb., 2010.
6. Men' A. V. Magizm i edinobozhie. M., 2005.
7. Men' A. V. Na poroge Novogo Zaveta. M., 2005.
8. Men' A. V. Pochemu nam trudno poverit' v Boga? Beseda za kruglym stolom, 1979 80 (?) // Vyshgorod.
Tallinn. 2005. ¹ 3–4.
9. Men' A. V. Trudnyy put' k dialogu. M., 1992.
10. Rashkovskiy E. B. Bibleyskiy myslitel': Zametki k 70-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya i 15-letiyu gibeli
protoiereya Aleksandra Menya // Doroga vmeste. M., 2005. ¹ 3.
11. Rashkovskiy E. B. Vladimir Solov'ev: khristianskaya reviziya «skholastiki» pozitivizma // Rashkovskiy E. B.
Smysly v istorii. Issledovaniya po istorii very, poznaniya i kul'tury. M., 2008.
12. Skorokhodova T. G. Bengal'skoe Vozrozhdenie. Ocherki istorii sotsiokul'turnogo sinteza v indiyskoy
filosofskoy mysli Novogo vremeni. SPb., 2008.
13. Skorokhodova T. G. Vostokovednoe znachenie trudov A. V. Menya: indologicheskie aspekty // Vostok. Afro-
aziatskie soobshchestva: istoriya i sovremennost'. 2011. ¹ 5.
14. Skorokhodova T. G. Rammokhan Ray, rodonachal'nik Bengal'skogo Vozrozhdeniya (Opyt analiticheskoy bio-
grafii). SPb., 2008.
15. Skorokhodova T. G. Khristianskaya teologiya dlya induistov: Krishnomokhan Banerdzhi // Asiatica: Trudy po
filosofii i kul'turam Vostoka. Vyp. 5 / Otv. red. S. V. Pakhomov. SPb., 2011.
16. Ahluwalia Sh., Ahluwalia M. Raja Rammohun Roy and the Indian Renaissance. New Delhi, 1991.
17. Baago K. Pioneers of Indigenous Christianity. Bangalore, 1969.
18. Banerjea Krishna Mohun. Dialogues on the Hindu Philosophy. L.; Edinburgh: Williams & Norgate, 1861.
19. Bhattacharjee K. S. The Bengal Renaissance: Social and Political Thought. New Delhi, 1986.
20. Chaudhuri N. Ch. The Intellectual in India. New Delhi: Association Publishing House, 1967.
21. Clarke Sathianathan. The Jesus of Nineteenth Century Indian Christian Theology // Studies in World Christianity
/ Ed. by James P. Mackey. Edinburgh, 1999. Vol. 5. Pt. I.
22. Collet S. D., Stead F. H. The Life and Letters of Raja Rammohun Roy / Ed. by D. K. Biswas and R. Ch. Ganguli. 3rd ed.
Calcutta: Sadharan Brahmo Samaj, 1962.
23. Encyclopaedic History of Indian Freedom Movement. Vol. 18. Raja Rammohun Roy: The Reformer. 2003.
24. Dasgupta Subrata. The Bengal Renaissance: Identity and Creativity from Rammohun Roy to Rabindranath Tagore.
Delhi, 2007.
25. Justyński Janusz. Mysl Spoleczna i Politiczna Renesansu Indyiskiego, od Rama Mohana Raya do Rabindranata
Tagora. Warszawa etc., 1985.
26. Killingley, D. H. Rammohun Roy in Hindu and Christian Tradition: the Teape Lectures 1990. Newcastle upon
Tyne, 1993.
27. Kopf D. British Orientalism and Bengal Renaissance. Berkeley, 1969.
28. Kopf D. Brahmo Samaj and Making of Modern Indian Mind. Princeton, 1979.
29. Krishna Mohan Banerjea: Christian Apologist / Ed. with introd. by T. V. Philip. Bangalore: CISRS, 1982.
30. Poddar A. Renaissance in Bengal. Quests and Confrontations. 1800–1860. Simla, 1970.
31. Poddar A. Renaissance in Bengal. Search for Identity. 1860–1919. Simla, 1977;
32. Rammohun Roy. A Bi-centenary Tribute. Ed. by N. Ray. New Delhi: National Book Trust, 1974.
33. Rammohan Roy, the Apostle of Indian Awakening: Some Contemporary Estimates / Ed. B. M. Sankhdher. New
Delhi, 1989.
34. Sharma S. K. Raja Rammohun Roy. In 3 vols. Delhi, 2005.
35. Roy Raja Rammohun. The English Works / Ed. by J. C. Ghose. In 4 vols. New Delhi: Cosmo, 1982.
36. Sarkar Susobhan. Bengal Renaissance and Other Essays. New Delhi, etc.: People’s Publishing House, 1970.
37. Sharma S. K. Raja Rammohun Roy. In 3 vols. Delhi, 2005.

References (transliteration):
1. Berdyaev N. A. Filosofiya tvorchestva, kul'tury i iskusstva: V 2-kh t. T. 2. M., 1994.
2. Dvadtsat' let bez ottsa Aleksandra. I s nim / Otv. red. E. B. Rashkovskiy. M., 2010.
3. Krasitskiy Ya. Bog, chelovek i zlo: Issledovanie filosofii Vladimira Solov'eva. M., 2009.
4. Zernov N. M. Russkoe religioznoe vozrozhdenie KhKh veka / Per. s angl. N. M. Zernova. Izd. 2-e, ispr. Paris, 1991.
5. Zernov N. M. Tri russkikh proroka: Khomyakov, Dostoevskiy, Solov'ev. SPb., 2010.
6. Men' A. V. Magizm i edinobozhie. M., 2005.
7. Men' A. V. Na poroge Novogo Zaveta. M., 2005.
8. Men' A. V. Pochemu nam trudno poverit' v Boga? Beseda za kruglym stolom, 1979 80 (?) // Vyshgorod.
Tallinn. 2005. ¹ 3–4.
9. Men' A. V. Trudnyy put' k dialogu. M., 1992.
10. Rashkovskiy E. B. Bibleyskiy myslitel': Zametki k 70-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya i 15-letiyu gibeli
protoiereya Aleksandra Menya // Doroga vmeste. M., 2005. ¹ 3.
11. Rashkovskiy E. B. Vladimir Solov'ev: khristianskaya reviziya «skholastiki» pozitivizma // Rashkovskiy E. B.
Smysly v istorii. Issledovaniya po istorii very, poznaniya i kul'tury. M., 2008.
12. Skorokhodova T. G. Bengal'skoe Vozrozhdenie. Ocherki istorii sotsiokul'turnogo sinteza v indiyskoy
filosofskoy mysli Novogo vremeni. SPb., 2008.
13. Skorokhodova T. G. Vostokovednoe znachenie trudov A. V. Menya: indologicheskie aspekty // Vostok. Afro-
aziatskie soobshchestva: istoriya i sovremennost'. 2011. ¹ 5.
14. Skorokhodova T. G. Rammokhan Ray, rodonachal'nik Bengal'skogo Vozrozhdeniya (Opyt analiticheskoy bio-
grafii). SPb., 2008.
15. Skorokhodova T. G. Khristianskaya teologiya dlya induistov: Krishnomokhan Banerdzhi // Asiatica: Trudy po
filosofii i kul'turam Vostoka. Vyp. 5 / Otv. red. S. V. Pakhomov. SPb., 2011.
16. Ahluwalia Sh., Ahluwalia M. Raja Rammohun Roy and the Indian Renaissance. New Delhi, 1991.
17. Baago K. Pioneers of Indigenous Christianity. Bangalore, 1969.
18. Banerjea Krishna Mohun. Dialogues on the Hindu Philosophy. L.; Edinburgh: Williams & Norgate, 1861.
19. Bhattacharjee K. S. The Bengal Renaissance: Social and Political Thought. New Delhi, 1986.
20. Chaudhuri N. Ch. The Intellectual in India. New Delhi: Association Publishing House, 1967.
21. Clarke Sathianathan. The Jesus of Nineteenth Century Indian Christian Theology // Studies in World Christianity
/ Ed. by James P. Mackey. Edinburgh, 1999. Vol. 5. Pt. I.
22. Collet S. D., Stead F. H. The Life and Letters of Raja Rammohun Roy / Ed. by D. K. Biswas and R. Ch. Ganguli. 3rd ed.
Calcutta: Sadharan Brahmo Samaj, 1962.
23. Encyclopaedic History of Indian Freedom Movement. Vol. 18. Raja Rammohun Roy: The Reformer. 2003.
24. Dasgupta Subrata. The Bengal Renaissance: Identity and Creativity from Rammohun Roy to Rabindranath Tagore.
Delhi, 2007.
25. Justyński Janusz. Mysl Spoleczna i Politiczna Renesansu Indyiskiego, od Rama Mohana Raya do Rabindranata
Tagora. Warszawa etc., 1985.
26. Killingley, D. H. Rammohun Roy in Hindu and Christian Tradition: the Teape Lectures 1990. Newcastle upon
Tyne, 1993.
27. Kopf D. British Orientalism and Bengal Renaissance. Berkeley, 1969.
28. Kopf D. Brahmo Samaj and Making of Modern Indian Mind. Princeton, 1979.
29. Krishna Mohan Banerjea: Christian Apologist / Ed. with introd. by T. V. Philip. Bangalore: CISRS, 1982.
30. Poddar A. Renaissance in Bengal. Quests and Confrontations. 1800–1860. Simla, 1970.
31. Poddar A. Renaissance in Bengal. Search for Identity. 1860–1919. Simla, 1977;
32. Rammohun Roy. A Bi-centenary Tribute. Ed. by N. Ray. New Delhi: National Book Trust, 1974.
33. Rammohan Roy, the Apostle of Indian Awakening: Some Contemporary Estimates / Ed. B. M. Sankhdher. New
Delhi, 1989.
34. Sharma S. K. Raja Rammohun Roy. In 3 vols. Delhi, 2005.
35. Roy Raja Rammohun. The English Works / Ed. by J. C. Ghose. In 4 vols. New Delhi: Cosmo, 1982.
36. Sarkar Susobhan. Bengal Renaissance and Other Essays. New Delhi, etc.: People’s Publishing House, 1970.
37. Sharma S. K. Raja Rammohun Roy. In 3 vols. Delhi, 2005.

Abstract: The article analyzes prerequisites of Antique art as well as the rational element of this kind of art described in Aristotle’s Poetics. These prerequisties include: formation of the Antique personality and person-oriented practice (which resulted in formation of Antique drama, art and other genres) on one hand and formation of Antique philosophy and science on the other hand. The author provides a more detailed analysis of Plato’s and Aristotle’s programs: challenge of time, consruction of learning standars, introduced ideals in philosophy and science. The author tries to show that philosophical description of Antique art in Aristotle’s Poetics is nothing else but the development of ‘science about art’. The author also analyzes peculiarities of this kind of science and the impact it had on development of Antique and other arts.

Keywords: cultural studies, art, practice, personality, society, norms, discussions, science, philosophy, culture.

References:
1. Aristotel'. Analitiki. M., 1948.
2. Aristotel'. Metafizika. M., L., 1934.
3. Aristotel'. O dushe. M., 1934.
4. Aristotel'. Politika // Soch. v 4 t. T. 4. M., 1983.
5. Aristotel'. Poetika. M., 1951. 1065 (http://exbicio.boom.ru).
6. Aristotel'. Fizika. M., 1936.
7. Asmolov A. G. Psikhologiya lichnosti. Printsipy obshchepsikhologicheskogo analiza. M., 2001.
8. Akhutin A. V. Otkrytie soznaniya // Chelovek i kul'tura. M., 1990.
9. Platon. Apologiya Sokrata // Sobr. soch.: V 4 t. T. 1. M., 1994.
10. Platon. Fedr // Sobr. soch.: V 4 t. T. 2.
11. Rozin V. M. Vvedenie v skhemologiyu. Skhemy v filosofii, kul'ture, nauke, proektirovanii. M., 2011.
12. Rozin V. M. Metodologiya: stanovlenie i sovremennoe sostoyanie: Ucheb. posobie. M., 2005.
13. Rozin V. M. Nauka: proiskhozhdenie, razvitie, tipologiya, novaya kontseptualizatsiya. M., 2008.
14. Rozin V. M. Priroda i genezis evropeyskogo iskusstva (filosofskiy i kul'turno-istoricheskiy analiz)
/ IFRAN. M.: Golos, 2011.
15. Rozin V. M. Tipy i diskursy nauchnogo myshleniya. M., 2001.

References (transliteration):
1. Aristotel'. Analitiki. M., 1948.
2. Aristotel'. Metafizika. M., L., 1934.
3. Aristotel'. O dushe. M., 1934.
4. Aristotel'. Politika // Soch. v 4 t. T. 4. M., 1983.
5. Aristotel'. Poetika. M., 1951. 1065 (http://exbicio.boom.ru).
6. Aristotel'. Fizika. M., 1936.
7. Asmolov A. G. Psikhologiya lichnosti. Printsipy obshchepsikhologicheskogo analiza. M., 2001.
8. Akhutin A. V. Otkrytie soznaniya // Chelovek i kul'tura. M., 1990.
9. Platon. Apologiya Sokrata // Sobr. soch.: V 4 t. T. 1. M., 1994.
10. Platon. Fedr // Sobr. soch.: V 4 t. T. 2.
11. Rozin V. M. Vvedenie v skhemologiyu. Skhemy v filosofii, kul'ture, nauke, proektirovanii. M., 2011.
12. Rozin V. M. Metodologiya: stanovlenie i sovremennoe sostoyanie: Ucheb. posobie. M., 2005.
13. Rozin V. M. Nauka: proiskhozhdenie, razvitie, tipologiya, novaya kontseptualizatsiya. M., 2008.
14. Rozin V. M. Priroda i genezis evropeyskogo iskusstva (filosofskiy i kul'turno-istoricheskiy analiz)
/ IFRAN. M.: Golos, 2011.
15. Rozin V. M. Tipy i diskursy nauchnogo myshleniya. M., 2001.

Abstract: The author of the article suggests to view architecture and music as analogies of the time-space continuum in physics and mathematics. A ‘poetic’ word is the core beginning connecting architecture and music and bringing meaning into culture. The ‘architecture, music, literature (language)’ triangle is the foundation of all cultures.

Keywords: cultural studies, culture, architecture, music, space, time, number, word, logic, analogy.

References:
1. Hamilton W. R. Essay on Algebra as the Science of Pure Time // Transactions of the Royal Irish Academy, vol. 17,
part 1 (1837), p. 293–422.
2. Benvenist E. Obshchaya lingvistika / Pod red. Yu. S. Stepanova. M.: Editorial URSS, 2002.
3. Blazhennyy Avgustin. Tvoreniya: V 4 t. T. 1: Ispoved'. SPb.: Aleteyya; Kiev: UTsIMM-Press , 2000.
4. Leybnits G. V. Sobr. soch.: V 4 t. T.2: Novye opyty o chelovecheskom razume. M.: Mysl', 1983.
5. Platon. Sobr. Soch.: V 4 t. T. 3(1): Timey. M.: Mysl', 1971.
6. Uorf B. Nauka i yazykoznanie. O dvukh oshibochnykh vozzreniyakh na rech' i myshlenie, kharakterizuyushchikh
sistemu estestvennoy logiki, i o tom, kak slova i obychai vliyayut na myshlenie // Zarubezhnaya lingvistika.
Vyp. 1. M.: Progress, 1999.
7. Uorf B. Otnoshenie norm povedeniya i myshleniya k yazyku // Zarubezhnaya lingvistika. Vyp. 1. M.:
Progress, 1999.
8. Shelling F. V. Filosofiya iskusstva. M.: Mysl', 1966.

References (transliteration):
1. Hamilton W. R. Essay on Algebra as the Science of Pure Time // Transactions of the Royal Irish Academy, vol. 17,
part 1 (1837), p. 293–422.
2. Benvenist E. Obshchaya lingvistika / Pod red. Yu. S. Stepanova. M.: Editorial URSS, 2002.
3. Blazhennyy Avgustin. Tvoreniya: V 4 t. T. 1: Ispoved'. SPb.: Aleteyya; Kiev: UTsIMM-Press , 2000.
4. Leybnits G. V. Sobr. soch.: V 4 t. T.2: Novye opyty o chelovecheskom razume. M.: Mysl', 1983.
5. Platon. Sobr. Soch.: V 4 t. T. 3(1): Timey. M.: Mysl', 1971.
6. Uorf B. Nauka i yazykoznanie. O dvukh oshibochnykh vozzreniyakh na rech' i myshlenie, kharakterizuyushchikh
sistemu estestvennoy logiki, i o tom, kak slova i obychai vliyayut na myshlenie // Zarubezhnaya lingvistika.
Vyp. 1. M.: Progress, 1999.
7. Uorf B. Otnoshenie norm povedeniya i myshleniya k yazyku // Zarubezhnaya lingvistika. Vyp. 1. M.:
Progress, 1999.
8. Shelling F. V. Filosofiya iskusstva. M.: Mysl', 1966.

Abstract: In the article the term ‘philosophy of culture glossary’ is applied to M. Gorky’s experience in play write. DeÞ nition and argumentation of the problem is based on the materials of distinguished theatre interpretations of Gorky’s plays in the Russian theatre in the middle of the 20th century. Everyday values and their implementation into life are studied by the example of such plays as The Petty Bourgeois, The Lower Depths and The Last Ones. As a result, the author makes a conclusion about a ß exible and concise coordinate system denoting the life problems and values at the beginning of the 21st century.

Keywords: cultural studies, philosophy of culture, glossary, playwright, Gorky, life, faith, mercy, lie, disappointment.

References:
1. Ben'yash R. «Meshchane» segodnya // Zvezda, 1968, ¹ 3.
2. Berdyaev N. Revolyutsiya i kul'tura // Polyarnaya zvezda, 1905, ¹ 2
3. Dubnova E. Na gor'kovskikh spektaklyakh // Teatr, 1968, ¹ 9.
4. Zingerman B. Shkola Gor'kogo // Teatr, 1957, ¹ 8.
5. Zolotnitskiy D. Vzorvannyy oval // Smena, 1967, 14 yanvarya.
6. Merezhkovskiy D. Meshchanstvo i russkaya intelligentsiya // Polyarnaya zvezda, 1905, ¹ 1.
7. Tovstonogov G. O professii rezhissera. M., 1967.
8. Tolchenova N. Meshchanstvu – anafema! // Ogonek, 1967, ¹ 13.
9. Filosofov D. Slova i zhizn'. SPb., 1909.
10. Yuzovskiy Yu. Sovetskie aktery v gor'kovskikh rolyakh. M., 1964.

References (transliteration):
1. Ben'yash R. «Meshchane» segodnya // Zvezda, 1968, ¹ 3.
2. Berdyaev N. Revolyutsiya i kul'tura // Polyarnaya zvezda, 1905, ¹ 2
3. Dubnova E. Na gor'kovskikh spektaklyakh // Teatr, 1968, ¹ 9.
4. Zingerman B. Shkola Gor'kogo // Teatr, 1957, ¹ 8.
5. Zolotnitskiy D. Vzorvannyy oval // Smena, 1967, 14 yanvarya.
6. Merezhkovskiy D. Meshchanstvo i russkaya intelligentsiya // Polyarnaya zvezda, 1905, ¹ 1.
7. Tovstonogov G. O professii rezhissera. M., 1967.
8. Tolchenova N. Meshchanstvu – anafema! // Ogonek, 1967, ¹ 13.
9. Filosofov D. Slova i zhizn'. SPb., 1909.
10. Yuzovskiy Yu. Sovetskie aktery v gor'kovskikh rolyakh. M., 1964.

Abstract: The article proves the thesis that reality is a mistake. Based on the author, the entire psychoanalysis is based on mistakes. Mistakes are often met in everyday life. The imaginative plot is based on the phenomenon of a mistake.

Keywords: cultural studies, reality, mistake, mythology, language, Wittgenstein, psychopathology, life, non-transparency.

Abstract: This article is an attempt to describe some phenomena typical for formation of the Russian humanitarian science. The author narrows done the epoch from the ‘thaw’ to the break-up of the USSR to the two great philosophers Mikhail Bakhtin and Gyorgy Lucacs. While Bakhtin’s ideas back in those times gave a perspective for development of art and cultural studies and therefore were very popular, it took longer time for Lucacs’ ideas to be recognized by the Russians. It is explained by the fact that throughout his creative path Lucacs was becoming a successive Marxist and interest in Marxism weakened after the catastrophic fall of communism in Russia. A good example of Lucacs’ Marxist esthetics is his late fundamental work on esthetics which is being republished now. However, Lucacs’ ideas did have a rational kernel and lately many researchers have realized it and have been addressing again and again to his philosophy and esthetics. Despite all the difference in methodological approaches of these two philosophers, the author of the article manages to fi nd what they had in common.

Keywords: cultural studies, anthropomorphism; desanthropomorphism, esthetics, dialogue, humanity, crisis of a novel, classical esthetics, non-classical esthetics, sacral, Aristotle’s tradition, Plato’s tradition, avant-garde in art, dehumanization, estrangement, esthetical conscience.

Contact information: Khrenov Nikolay Andreevich, nihrenov@mail.ru