Review: The article analyzes the provisions of codified documents of the CIS member-states which regulate the functions of prosecutors in administrative prosecution. The author emphasizes the common traits of development of legal regulation in the mentioned countries, and the peculiarities of the legal status of prosecutors. The author comes to the conclusion about a relative character of definition of a procedural status of prosecutors as supervising officials and participants of administrative proceedings in different countries. The research is based on the comparative-legal method of study of the data – the codes of administrative offences of the nine CIS countries. The analysis of the available base of scientific publications demonstrates the lack of works studying the specificity of legal regulation of prosecutors’ activities in several countries at once. Therefore, the present research is scientifically new; it continues the previous research of the author devoted to the analysis of the provisions of the laws on the prosecution in the CIS member-states.  

Keywords: administrative offence, administrative prosecution, administrative investigation, Code of administrative offences, administrative jurisdiction bodies, public prosecutor's bodies, prosecutor's functions, decision, involvement in proceedings, public prosecutor's function

References:
Vinokurov A.Yu., Vinokurov Yu.E. O novom vzglyade na polnomochiya prokurora, svya-zannye s primeneniem Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonaru-sheniyakh // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe prava. – 2012. – ¹ 5. – S. 34-38.
Salishcheva N.G. V kn.: Kommentariy k Kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob admini-strativnykh pravonarusheniyakh (postateynyy) / pod obshch. red. N.G. Salishchevoy. – 7-e izda-nie. – M.: Prospekt, 2011 // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus.
SZ RF. – 1995. – ¹ 47. – St. 4472 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
Zakon Ukrainy ot 14.10.2014 ¹ 1697-VII «O prokurature» // Golos Ukrainy ot 25.10.2014 ¹ 206.
Kolotilo A.O. Status prokurora v proizvodstve po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v Rossii i Ukraine // Zakonnost'. – 2013. – ¹ 2.
Ergashev E.R. O problemakh normativnogo regulirovaniya primeneniya postanov-leniya o vozbuzhdenii administrativnogo proizvodstva kak akta prokurorskogo reagiro-vaniya // Biznes, Menedzhment i Pravo. – 2012. – ¹ 2; Lomakin V.I. Ukaz. soch. – S. 58 i dr.
Zakon Respubliki Moldova ot 25.12.2008 ¹ 294 «O prokurature» // Base.spinform.ru. Zakonodatel'stvo stran SNG. Data obrashcheniya – 28.04.2015.
Lomakin V.I. Prokuror v proizvodstve po delam ob administrativnykh pravona-rusheniyakh: diss. na soisk. uchen. step. kand. yurid. nauk (12.00.14). – Chelyabinsk, 2006. – S. 107.
Vinokurov A.Yu. K voprosu ob identifikatsii ponyatiya «prokuror» pri primene-nii Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Admini-strativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2014. – ¹ 7. – S. 665-672.
Kodeks Respubliki Moldova ot 24.10.2008 ¹ 218-XVI «O pravonarusheniyakh» (dalee – KoP M ili Kodeks Respubliki Moldova) // Ofitsial'nyy monitor Respubliki Moldova ot 16.01.2009 ¹ 3-6/15 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
Kodeks Azerbaydzhanskoy Respubliki ob administrativnykh prostupkakh: utver-zhden Zakonom Azerbaydzhanskoy Respubliki ot 11.07.2000 ¹ 906-IQ (dalee – KoAP AR ili Kodeks Azerbaydzhanskoy Respubliki) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Azerbaydzhan-skoy Respubliki. – 2000. – ¹ 8 (kn. 1). – St. 584 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
Kodeks Ukrainy ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 07.12.1984 ¹ 8073-X (dalee – KoAP U ili Kodeks Ukrainy) // Vedomosti Verkhovnoy Rady Ukrainskoy SSR. – 1984. – ¹ 51 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
Kodeks Kyrgyzskoy Respubliki ob administrativnoy otvetstvennosti ot 04.08.1998 ¹ 114 (dalee – KoAO KR ili Kodeks Kyrgyzskoy Respubliki) // Vedomosti Zhogorku Kenesha Kyrgyzskoy Respubliki. – 1999. – ¹ 2. – St. 77 (s posled. izmeneniya-mi).
Kodeks Respubliki Uzbekistan ob administrativnoy otvetstvennosti: utver-zhden Zakonom Respubliki Uzbekistan ot 22.09.1994 ¹ 2015-XII (dalee – KoAO RU ili Kodeks Respubliki Uzbekistan) // Vedomosti Verkhovnogo Soveta Respubliki Uzbekistan. – 1995. – ¹ 3.
Kodeks Turkmenistana ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh: utverzhden i vve-den v deystvie Zakonom Turkmenistana ot 29.08.2013 (dalee – KoAP T ili Kodeks Turk-menistana) // Elektronnaya gazeta «Turkmenistan: zolotoy vek».
Kodeks Respubliki Tadzhikistan ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh: pri-nyat i vveden v deystvie Zakonom Respubliki Tadzhikistan ot 31.12.2008 ¹ 455 (dalee – KoAP RT ili Kodeks Respubliki Tadzhikistan) // Akhbori Madzhlisi Oli Respubliki Tadzhikistan. – 2008. – ¹ 12 (ch. 1). – St. 989 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
http://www.pravo.by. Natsional'nyy pravovoy Internet-portal Respubliki Bela-rus'. Data obrashcheniya – 28.04.2015.
Kodeks Respubliki Kazakhstan ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 05.07.2014 ¹ 235-V ZRK (dalee – KoAP RK ili Kodeks Respubliki Kazakhstan) // Vedomo-sti Parlamenta Respubliki Kazakhstan. – 2014. – ¹ 18-II (2667-II). – St. 92 (s posled. iz-meneniyami).
http://www.pravo.by. Natsional'nyy pravovoy Internet-portal Respubliki Bela-rus'. Data obrashcheniya – 28.04.2015.
Vinokurov A.Yu. O nekotorykh voprosakh pravovogo regulirovaniya deyatel'nosti or-ganov prokuratury gosudarstv – uchastnikov SNG po osushchestvleniyu administrativnogo presledovaniya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2015. – ¹ . – S.
SZ RF. – 2002. – ¹ 1 (ch. 1). – St. 1 (s posled. izmeneniyami).

References (transliteration):
Vinokurov A.Yu., Vinokurov Yu.E. O novom vzglyade na polnomochiya prokurora, svya-zannye s primeneniem Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonaru-sheniyakh // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe prava. – 2012. – ¹ 5. – S. 34-38.
Salishcheva N.G. V kn.: Kommentariy k Kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob admini-strativnykh pravonarusheniyakh (postateynyy) / pod obshch. red. N.G. Salishchevoy. – 7-e izda-nie. – M.: Prospekt, 2011 // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus.
SZ RF. – 1995. – ¹ 47. – St. 4472 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
Zakon Ukrainy ot 14.10.2014 ¹ 1697-VII «O prokurature» // Golos Ukrainy ot 25.10.2014 ¹ 206.
Kolotilo A.O. Status prokurora v proizvodstve po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v Rossii i Ukraine // Zakonnost'. – 2013. – ¹ 2.
Ergashev E.R. O problemakh normativnogo regulirovaniya primeneniya postanov-leniya o vozbuzhdenii administrativnogo proizvodstva kak akta prokurorskogo reagiro-vaniya // Biznes, Menedzhment i Pravo. – 2012. – ¹ 2; Lomakin V.I. Ukaz. soch. – S. 58 i dr.
Zakon Respubliki Moldova ot 25.12.2008 ¹ 294 «O prokurature» // Base.spinform.ru. Zakonodatel'stvo stran SNG. Data obrashcheniya – 28.04.2015.
Lomakin V.I. Prokuror v proizvodstve po delam ob administrativnykh pravona-rusheniyakh: diss. na soisk. uchen. step. kand. yurid. nauk (12.00.14). – Chelyabinsk, 2006. – S. 107.
Vinokurov A.Yu. K voprosu ob identifikatsii ponyatiya «prokuror» pri primene-nii Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Admini-strativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2014. – ¹ 7. – S. 665-672.
Kodeks Respubliki Moldova ot 24.10.2008 ¹ 218-XVI «O pravonarusheniyakh» (dalee – KoP M ili Kodeks Respubliki Moldova) // Ofitsial'nyy monitor Respubliki Moldova ot 16.01.2009 ¹ 3-6/15 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
Kodeks Azerbaydzhanskoy Respubliki ob administrativnykh prostupkakh: utver-zhden Zakonom Azerbaydzhanskoy Respubliki ot 11.07.2000 ¹ 906-IQ (dalee – KoAP AR ili Kodeks Azerbaydzhanskoy Respubliki) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Azerbaydzhan-skoy Respubliki. – 2000. – ¹ 8 (kn. 1). – St. 584 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
Kodeks Ukrainy ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 07.12.1984 ¹ 8073-X (dalee – KoAP U ili Kodeks Ukrainy) // Vedomosti Verkhovnoy Rady Ukrainskoy SSR. – 1984. – ¹ 51 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
Kodeks Kyrgyzskoy Respubliki ob administrativnoy otvetstvennosti ot 04.08.1998 ¹ 114 (dalee – KoAO KR ili Kodeks Kyrgyzskoy Respubliki) // Vedomosti Zhogorku Kenesha Kyrgyzskoy Respubliki. – 1999. – ¹ 2. – St. 77 (s posled. izmeneniya-mi).
Kodeks Respubliki Uzbekistan ob administrativnoy otvetstvennosti: utver-zhden Zakonom Respubliki Uzbekistan ot 22.09.1994 ¹ 2015-XII (dalee – KoAO RU ili Kodeks Respubliki Uzbekistan) // Vedomosti Verkhovnogo Soveta Respubliki Uzbekistan. – 1995. – ¹ 3.
Kodeks Turkmenistana ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh: utverzhden i vve-den v deystvie Zakonom Turkmenistana ot 29.08.2013 (dalee – KoAP T ili Kodeks Turk-menistana) // Elektronnaya gazeta «Turkmenistan: zolotoy vek».
Kodeks Respubliki Tadzhikistan ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh: pri-nyat i vveden v deystvie Zakonom Respubliki Tadzhikistan ot 31.12.2008 ¹ 455 (dalee – KoAP RT ili Kodeks Respubliki Tadzhikistan) // Akhbori Madzhlisi Oli Respubliki Tadzhikistan. – 2008. – ¹ 12 (ch. 1). – St. 989 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
http://www.pravo.by. Natsional'nyy pravovoy Internet-portal Respubliki Bela-rus'. Data obrashcheniya – 28.04.2015.
Kodeks Respubliki Kazakhstan ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 05.07.2014 ¹ 235-V ZRK (dalee – KoAP RK ili Kodeks Respubliki Kazakhstan) // Vedomo-sti Parlamenta Respubliki Kazakhstan. – 2014. – ¹ 18-II (2667-II). – St. 92 (s posled. iz-meneniyami).
http://www.pravo.by. Natsional'nyy pravovoy Internet-portal Respubliki Bela-rus'. Data obrashcheniya – 28.04.2015.
Vinokurov A.Yu. O nekotorykh voprosakh pravovogo regulirovaniya deyatel'nosti or-ganov prokuratury gosudarstv – uchastnikov SNG po osushchestvleniyu administrativnogo presledovaniya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2015. – ¹ . – S.
SZ RF. – 2002. – ¹ 1 (ch. 1). – St. 1 (s posled. izmeneniyami).

Review: The subject of the research covers the peculiarities of legal regulation of the activities of public prosecutor’s office bodies of the CIS member-states in the sphere of administrative prosecution. This paper is the first stage of a comparative-legal study and is devoted to the analysis of the provisions of status legislative acts of the countries of the post-Soviet space (except for the Baltic states), regulating the issues of organization and activity of the public prosecutor’s office bodies and the model law on the public prosecutor’s office. The author emphasizes the provisions which are similar for the public prosecutor’s offices of different countries and outlines the distinct features of a public prosecutor’s office of each country. The methodology of the research is based on the comparative-legal and partially on the historical method which allow the author to reveal the similarities and differences in realization of administrative prosecution functions by the public prosecutor’s offices of different countries of the CIS. The author carries out the comparative-legal analysis of the provisions of laws on public prosecutor’s office of the CIS countries in the area of consolidatioin of the prosecutors’ responsibilities in the sphere of administrative offences revelation. The author concludes that the prosecutors in the CIS member-states have similar and unique responsibilities in the sphere of administrative prosecution depending on a model of public prosecutor’s office development of each country.

Keywords: function of the procecutor's office, prosecutor's status, involvement in the process, decision, administrative prosecution, administrative offence, administrative proceeding, administrative and jurisdictional process, public prosecutor's office bodies, prosecutor's responsibilities

References:
Base.spinform.ru. Zakonodatel'stvo stran SNG. Data obrashcheniya – 20.04.2015.
www.pravo.by. Natsional'nyy internet-portal Respubliki Belarus'. Data obra-shcheniya – 20.04.2015.
www.prokuror.kg. Ofitsial'nyy sayt General'noy prokuratury Kyrgyzskoy Res-publiki. Data obrashcheniya – 20.04.2015.
Base.spinform.ru. Zakonodatel'stvo stran SNG. Data obrashcheniya – 20.04.2015.
Golos Ukrainy ot 25.10.2014 ¹ 206.
Bidomosti Verkhovnoi Radi. – 1991. – ¹ 53. – St. 793 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
Akhbori Madzhlisi Oli Respubliki Tadzhikistan. – 2005. – ¹ 7. – St. 398 (s po-sled. izmeneniyami).
Eto sozvuchno podkhodu, ranee imevshemu zakreplenie v st. 230 «Prokurorskiy nadzor za ispolneniem zakonov pri proizvodstve po delam ob administrativnykh pravo-narusheniyakh» KoAP RSFSR. A v deystvuyushchey st. 25.1 KoAP RF takie polnomochiya kha-rakterizuyut prokurora kak uchastnika proizvodstva po delam ob administrativnykh pra-vonarusheniyakh.
Law.vl.ru. Data obrashcheniya – 20.04.2015.
Online.zakon.kz. Data obrashcheniya – 20.04.2015.
Vedomosti Verkhovnogo Soveta Respubliki Uzbekistan. – 1993. – ¹ 1. – St. 29 (s posled. izmeneniyami). Utverzhden v novoy redaktsii Zakonom Respubliki Uzbekistan ot 29.08.2001 ¹ 257-II «O vnesenii izmeneniy i dopolneniy v Zakon Respubliki Uzbeki-stan ″O prokurature″» // lex.uz. Data obrashcheniya – 20.04.2015.
SZ RF. – 1995. – ¹ 47. – St. 4472 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
Model'nyy zakon o prokurature: prinyat postanovleniem Mezhparlamentskoy Assamblei gosudarstv – uchastnikov SNG ot 16.11.2006 ¹ 27-6 // Informatsionnyy byul-leten'. Mezhparlamentskaya Assambleya gosudarstv – uchastnikov Sodruzhestva Nezavisi-mykh Gosudarstv. – 2007. – ¹ 39 (ch. 1). – S. 317-362.
Stat'i 1, 22, 25 i 26 Zakona o prokurature.
Kolotilo A.O. Status prokurora v proizvodstve po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v Rossii i Ukraine // Zakonnost'. – 2013. – ¹ 12. Podcherknem, chto samo po sebe uchastie prokurora v rassmotrenii sudami takikh del ne yavlyaetsya chast'yu realiza-tsii funktsii administrativnogo presledovaniya, sostavlyaya soderzhanie takoy traditsion-no izvestnoy funktsii kak uchastie prokurora v rassmotrenii del sudami (sm.: Vinokurov A.Yu. Ukaz. rab. – S. 55).
Shcherba S.P., Reshetnikova T.A., Zaytsev O.A. Prokuratura v stranakh SNG (pravovoy status, funktsii, polnomochiya): nauchnoe i uchebnoe posobie / pod obshch. i nauch. red. S.P. Shcherby. – M.: Ekzamen, 2007; Shcherba S.P., Reshetnikova T.A., Frolova M.A. Polnomochiya organov prokuratury gosudarstva – uchastnikov SNG: monografiya / pod obshch. i nauch. red. S.P. Shcherby. – M.: Yurlitinform, 2013.
Subanova N.V. K voprosu ob osushchestvlenii prokuraturoy funktsii administra-tivnogo presledovaniya // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. – 2015. – ¹
– S. 67-73. 4. Prokurorskiy nadzor: uchebnik dlya akademicheskogo bakalavriata / pod red. Yu.E. Vinokurova. – 12-e izdanie. – M.: Yurayt. 2015. – S. 286-303.
Vinokurov A.Yu. Administrativnoe presledovanie kak funktsiya prokuratury Ros-siyskoy Federatsii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2012. – ¹ 10. – S. 52-56.
Razorenov K.I. Funktsiya administrativnogo presledovaniya v administrativno-yurisdiktsionnom protsesse: diss. na soisk. uchen. step. kand. yurid. nauk.12.00.14. – M., 2011; Tyurina A.A. Funktsiya zashchity v administrativno-yurisdiktsionnom protsesse: diss. na soisk. uchen. step. kand. yurid. nauk.12.00.14. – M., 2007.

References (transliteration):
Base.spinform.ru. Zakonodatel'stvo stran SNG. Data obrashcheniya – 20.04.2015.
www.pravo.by. Natsional'nyy internet-portal Respubliki Belarus'. Data obra-shcheniya – 20.04.2015.
www.prokuror.kg. Ofitsial'nyy sayt General'noy prokuratury Kyrgyzskoy Res-publiki. Data obrashcheniya – 20.04.2015.
Base.spinform.ru. Zakonodatel'stvo stran SNG. Data obrashcheniya – 20.04.2015.
Golos Ukrainy ot 25.10.2014 ¹ 206.
Bidomosti Verkhovnoi Radi. – 1991. – ¹ 53. – St. 793 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
Akhbori Madzhlisi Oli Respubliki Tadzhikistan. – 2005. – ¹ 7. – St. 398 (s po-sled. izmeneniyami).
Eto sozvuchno podkhodu, ranee imevshemu zakreplenie v st. 230 «Prokurorskiy nadzor za ispolneniem zakonov pri proizvodstve po delam ob administrativnykh pravo-narusheniyakh» KoAP RSFSR. A v deystvuyushchey st. 25.1 KoAP RF takie polnomochiya kha-rakterizuyut prokurora kak uchastnika proizvodstva po delam ob administrativnykh pra-vonarusheniyakh.
Law.vl.ru. Data obrashcheniya – 20.04.2015.
Online.zakon.kz. Data obrashcheniya – 20.04.2015.
Vedomosti Verkhovnogo Soveta Respubliki Uzbekistan. – 1993. – ¹ 1. – St. 29 (s posled. izmeneniyami). Utverzhden v novoy redaktsii Zakonom Respubliki Uzbekistan ot 29.08.2001 ¹ 257-II «O vnesenii izmeneniy i dopolneniy v Zakon Respubliki Uzbeki-stan ″O prokurature″» // lex.uz. Data obrashcheniya – 20.04.2015.
SZ RF. – 1995. – ¹ 47. – St. 4472 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
Model'nyy zakon o prokurature: prinyat postanovleniem Mezhparlamentskoy Assamblei gosudarstv – uchastnikov SNG ot 16.11.2006 ¹ 27-6 // Informatsionnyy byul-leten'. Mezhparlamentskaya Assambleya gosudarstv – uchastnikov Sodruzhestva Nezavisi-mykh Gosudarstv. – 2007. – ¹ 39 (ch. 1). – S. 317-362.
Stat'i 1, 22, 25 i 26 Zakona o prokurature.
Kolotilo A.O. Status prokurora v proizvodstve po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v Rossii i Ukraine // Zakonnost'. – 2013. – ¹ 12. Podcherknem, chto samo po sebe uchastie prokurora v rassmotrenii sudami takikh del ne yavlyaetsya chast'yu realiza-tsii funktsii administrativnogo presledovaniya, sostavlyaya soderzhanie takoy traditsion-no izvestnoy funktsii kak uchastie prokurora v rassmotrenii del sudami (sm.: Vinokurov A.Yu. Ukaz. rab. – S. 55).
Shcherba S.P., Reshetnikova T.A., Zaytsev O.A. Prokuratura v stranakh SNG (pravovoy status, funktsii, polnomochiya): nauchnoe i uchebnoe posobie / pod obshch. i nauch. red. S.P. Shcherby. – M.: Ekzamen, 2007; Shcherba S.P., Reshetnikova T.A., Frolova M.A. Polnomochiya organov prokuratury gosudarstva – uchastnikov SNG: monografiya / pod obshch. i nauch. red. S.P. Shcherby. – M.: Yurlitinform, 2013.
Subanova N.V. K voprosu ob osushchestvlenii prokuraturoy funktsii administra-tivnogo presledovaniya // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. – 2015. – ¹
– S. 67-73. 4. Prokurorskiy nadzor: uchebnik dlya akademicheskogo bakalavriata / pod red. Yu.E. Vinokurova. – 12-e izdanie. – M.: Yurayt. 2015. – S. 286-303.
Vinokurov A.Yu. Administrativnoe presledovanie kak funktsiya prokuratury Ros-siyskoy Federatsii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2012. – ¹ 10. – S. 52-56.
Razorenov K.I. Funktsiya administrativnogo presledovaniya v administrativno-yurisdiktsionnom protsesse: diss. na soisk. uchen. step. kand. yurid. nauk.12.00.14. – M., 2011; Tyurina A.A. Funktsiya zashchity v administrativno-yurisdiktsionnom protsesse: diss. na soisk. uchen. step. kand. yurid. nauk.12.00.14. – M., 2007.