Abstract: The research subject is the main provisions of administrative law and procedure; the research task is to reveal the problem aspects, which appear in the result of shifting the part of the subject of administrative law into the subject of administrative procedure. The research results can be assessed in the context of the study; they are one of the stages of the subject of administrative procedure understanding. The major part of the subject of administrative law focuses on the issues of work of agencies and organizations, vested with authoritative powers, particularly the work of public administration, i.e. public management. The subject of administrative procedure should be understood as the work of courts – administrative legal proceedings and proceedings on administrative offences. The division of Russian administrative procedure law into two branches – administrative-executive (administrative procedure) law and administrative-judicial law - proves that administrative law is losing the part of its subject, connected with the activity of public administration. The field of application of the research results is determined by the research task and the conclusions about the application of the corresponding definitions - such as public administration, administrative procedure, etc. – in the subjects of administrative law and administrative procedure. The author applies general scientific methods (analysis, synthesis, the system method) and special scientific methods (formal legal and comparative legal). The author suggests to interpret administrative procedure as the activity of courts (court procedure). The author notes that the subject of administrative law includes public administration, i.e. the activity of agencies and organizations, vested with authoritative powers. The author admits the disputable character of his conclusions, and plans to continue the research in this sphere. 

Keywords: public administration , administrative legal proceedings , procedural rules, rules of substantive law, administrative procedure, public management, authoritative powers, term, definition, administrative law

References:
Volkov A.M. O yuridicheskoy konstruktsii ponyatiya "publichnoe administrirovanie" // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2014. N 6. S. 503-510. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.6.11569.
Volkov A.M. Problemy i protivorechiya sovremennogo administrativnogo zakonodatel'stva // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2014. N 6. S. 50-57.
Elistratov A.I. Administrativnoe pravo. M.: Tipografiya I.D. Sytina, 1911. S. 24.
Starilov Yu.N. Kodeks administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii: znachenie dlya sudebnoy i administrativnoy praktiki i problemy organizatsii prepodavaniya uchebnogo kursa // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2015. N 7. S. 13.
Starilov Yu.N. Sudebnyy normokontrol' i administrativnoe sudoproizvodstvo v sisteme modernizatsii administrativnogo i administrativnogo protsessual'nogo zakonodatel'stva // Mirovoy sud'ya. 2015. N 4. S. 38.
Kononov P.I. Administrativnoe sudoproizvodstvo v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: vzglyad administrativnogo sud'i // Administrativnoe sudoproizvodstvo v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: razvitie teorii i formirovanie administrativno-protsessual'nogo zakonodatel'stva. Seriya "Yubilei, konferentsii, forumy". Vyp. 7. Voronezh, 2013. S. 662.
Starilov Yu.N. «Upravlencheskaya» i «sudebnaya» kontseptsii administrativnogo protsessa: razvitie, sovremennoe znachenie i vzaimodeystvie // Vestnik VGU. Seriya "Pravo". 2006. N 1. S. 134-135.
Avrutin Yu.E. Mesto instituta administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva v pravovoy sisteme sovremennoy Rossii v kontekste obespecheniya nadlezhashchego gosudarstvennogo upravleniya // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2015. N 11. S. 4-15.
Solov'ev A.A. Pravovoe regulirovanie administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva v federativnykh gosudarstvakh: opyt Shveytsarii // Sud'ya. 2015. N 6. S. 56-59.
Administrativnyy protsess. Uchebnik dlya bakalavriata i magistratury. Salishcheva N.G. i dr. M.: Yurayt. 2015. 364 s.
Prizhennikova A.N., Baranov V.A. Aktual'nost' institutov administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva zarubezhnykh stran dlya rossiyskogo zakonodatel'stva // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2014. N 1. S. 53-57.
Demin A.A. Material'noe i protsessual'noe v administrativnykh pravootnosheniyakh // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2007. N 2. S. 6-9.
Volkov A.M. Publichnaya administratsiya i publichnoe administrirovanie: sootnoshenie ponyatiy // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2012. N 12. S. 14-19.
Administrativnyy protsess: uchebnik dlya bakalavriata i magistratury / Salishcheva N.G. i dr. M.: Yurayt, 2015. 364 s.
Zelentsov A.B. Kodeks administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii kak predposylka smeny paradigmy v teorii administrativnogo prava // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2015. N 11. S. 29.
Zelentsov A.B., Kononov P.I., Stakhov A.I. Administrativno-protsessual'noe pravo Rossii. Uchebnik dlya bakalavriata i magistratury. M.: Yurayt, 2016. 341 s.
Solovey Yu.P. O sovershenstvovanii zakonodatel'noy osnovy sudebnogo kontrolya za realizatsiey organami publichnoy administratsii i ikh dolzhnostnymi litsami diskretsionnykh polnomochiy // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2015. N 2. S. 46-51.
Serkov P.P. Aktual'nye voprosy sovershenstvovaniya administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2015. N 2. S. 29-33.
Kononov P.I. Administrativnyy protsess i administrativnoe sudoproizvodstvo: diskussionnye voprosy ponimaniya i sootnosheniya // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2014. N 3. S. 45-49.
Zelentsov A.B., Kononov P.I., Stakhov A.I. Administrativnyy protsess i administrativno-protsessual'noe pravo v Rossii: kontseptual'nye problemy sovremennogo razvitiya // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2013. N 12. S. 3-15.
Kononov P.I. O nekotorykh diskussionnykh voprosakh ponimaniya predmeta sovremennogo rossiyskogo administrativnogo prava // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2013. N 2. S. 4-8.
Avrutin Yu.E. K voprosu o ponyatiyakh i definitsiyakh v administrativno-pravovoy teorii i praktike // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2013. N 9. S. 4-8.
Avrutin Yu.E. Protsessual'no-pravovye formy obespecheniya konsensusa v sfere publichnogo upravleniya // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2014. N 10. S. 102-112.
Lapina M.A., Karpukhin D.V. Primenenie mer gosudarstvennogo prinuzhdeniya kak samostoyatel'nyy vid administrativno-yurisdiktsionnogo proizvodstva // Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie. 2015. ¹ 2. C. 261 - 266. DOI: 10.7256/2310-0508.2015.2.15846.
Zagrivko D.S. Printsipy osushchestvleniya administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva Rossii // Pravo i politika. 2014. ¹ 2. C. 181 - 186. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.2.6738.
Lapina M.A., Lokhmanov D.V. K voprosu o sub'ektakh i istochnikakh administrativnoy yurisdiktsii v finansovoy sfere // Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie. 2014. ¹ 3. C. 131 - 139. DOI: 10.7256/2310-0508.2014.3.13720.

References (transliteration):
Volkov A.M. O yuridicheskoy konstruktsii ponyatiya "publichnoe administrirovanie" // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2014. N 6. S. 503-510. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.6.11569.
Volkov A.M. Problemy i protivorechiya sovremennogo administrativnogo zakonodatel'stva // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2014. N 6. S. 50-57.
Elistratov A.I. Administrativnoe pravo. M.: Tipografiya I.D. Sytina, 1911. S. 24.
Starilov Yu.N. Kodeks administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii: znachenie dlya sudebnoy i administrativnoy praktiki i problemy organizatsii prepodavaniya uchebnogo kursa // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2015. N 7. S. 13.
Starilov Yu.N. Sudebnyy normokontrol' i administrativnoe sudoproizvodstvo v sisteme modernizatsii administrativnogo i administrativnogo protsessual'nogo zakonodatel'stva // Mirovoy sud'ya. 2015. N 4. S. 38.
Kononov P.I. Administrativnoe sudoproizvodstvo v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: vzglyad administrativnogo sud'i // Administrativnoe sudoproizvodstvo v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: razvitie teorii i formirovanie administrativno-protsessual'nogo zakonodatel'stva. Seriya "Yubilei, konferentsii, forumy". Vyp. 7. Voronezh, 2013. S. 662.
Starilov Yu.N. «Upravlencheskaya» i «sudebnaya» kontseptsii administrativnogo protsessa: razvitie, sovremennoe znachenie i vzaimodeystvie // Vestnik VGU. Seriya "Pravo". 2006. N 1. S. 134-135.
Avrutin Yu.E. Mesto instituta administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva v pravovoy sisteme sovremennoy Rossii v kontekste obespecheniya nadlezhashchego gosudarstvennogo upravleniya // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2015. N 11. S. 4-15.
Solov'ev A.A. Pravovoe regulirovanie administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva v federativnykh gosudarstvakh: opyt Shveytsarii // Sud'ya. 2015. N 6. S. 56-59.
Administrativnyy protsess. Uchebnik dlya bakalavriata i magistratury. Salishcheva N.G. i dr. M.: Yurayt. 2015. 364 s.
Prizhennikova A.N., Baranov V.A. Aktual'nost' institutov administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva zarubezhnykh stran dlya rossiyskogo zakonodatel'stva // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2014. N 1. S. 53-57.
Demin A.A. Material'noe i protsessual'noe v administrativnykh pravootnosheniyakh // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2007. N 2. S. 6-9.
Volkov A.M. Publichnaya administratsiya i publichnoe administrirovanie: sootnoshenie ponyatiy // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2012. N 12. S. 14-19.
Administrativnyy protsess: uchebnik dlya bakalavriata i magistratury / Salishcheva N.G. i dr. M.: Yurayt, 2015. 364 s.
Zelentsov A.B. Kodeks administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii kak predposylka smeny paradigmy v teorii administrativnogo prava // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2015. N 11. S. 29.
Zelentsov A.B., Kononov P.I., Stakhov A.I. Administrativno-protsessual'noe pravo Rossii. Uchebnik dlya bakalavriata i magistratury. M.: Yurayt, 2016. 341 s.
Solovey Yu.P. O sovershenstvovanii zakonodatel'noy osnovy sudebnogo kontrolya za realizatsiey organami publichnoy administratsii i ikh dolzhnostnymi litsami diskretsionnykh polnomochiy // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2015. N 2. S. 46-51.
Serkov P.P. Aktual'nye voprosy sovershenstvovaniya administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2015. N 2. S. 29-33.
Kononov P.I. Administrativnyy protsess i administrativnoe sudoproizvodstvo: diskussionnye voprosy ponimaniya i sootnosheniya // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2014. N 3. S. 45-49.
Zelentsov A.B., Kononov P.I., Stakhov A.I. Administrativnyy protsess i administrativno-protsessual'noe pravo v Rossii: kontseptual'nye problemy sovremennogo razvitiya // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2013. N 12. S. 3-15.
Kononov P.I. O nekotorykh diskussionnykh voprosakh ponimaniya predmeta sovremennogo rossiyskogo administrativnogo prava // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2013. N 2. S. 4-8.
Avrutin Yu.E. K voprosu o ponyatiyakh i definitsiyakh v administrativno-pravovoy teorii i praktike // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2013. N 9. S. 4-8.
Avrutin Yu.E. Protsessual'no-pravovye formy obespecheniya konsensusa v sfere publichnogo upravleniya // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2014. N 10. S. 102-112.
Lapina M.A., Karpukhin D.V. Primenenie mer gosudarstvennogo prinuzhdeniya kak samostoyatel'nyy vid administrativno-yurisdiktsionnogo proizvodstva // Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie. 2015. ¹ 2. C. 261 - 266. DOI: 10.7256/2310-0508.2015.2.15846.
Zagrivko D.S. Printsipy osushchestvleniya administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva Rossii // Pravo i politika. 2014. ¹ 2. C. 181 - 186. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.2.6738.
Lapina M.A., Lokhmanov D.V. K voprosu o sub'ektakh i istochnikakh administrativnoy yurisdiktsii v finansovoy sfere // Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie. 2014. ¹ 3. C. 131 - 139. DOI: 10.7256/2310-0508.2014.3.13720.

Abstract: The research subject is the Soviet legislation, which had regulated the peculiarities of imposition of administrative sanctions on persons with special legal status. The research object is social relations, regulated by that legislation, with special attention to the activities of prosecutors, responsible for administrative prosecution of persons with special legal status. The author analyzes the evolutional aspects of such legislation development, assesses the positive and negative sides of legal regulation in that period. The main research method is the historical method, connected with the understanding of the peculiarities of legal regulation of the procedures of administrative prosecution of persons with special legal status. Besides, the author compares the corresponding norms and provisions of the current legislation. The author concludes that the legislation, regulating the peculiarities of imposition of administrative sanctions on the persons with special legal status, started forming in the late 1960s, and by the end of the Soviet period in 1991 it had contained a wide range of legislative provisions, guaranteeing special conditions of administrative prosecution of several categories of persons with special legal status. 

Keywords: petition by a public prosecutor , special legal status, legislation, administrative prosecution, administrative offence, administrative responsibility, imposition of sanctions, prosecutor, agreement, court order

References:
Vedomosti SND RSFSR i VS RSFSR. – 1991. – ¹ 19. – St. 621.
Vedomosti SND SSSR i VS SSSR. – 1989. – ¹ 29. – St. 572.
Vedomosti SND RSFSR i VS RSFSR. – 1991. – ¹ 17. – St. 510.
Vedomosti SND SSSR i VS SSSR. – 1990. – ¹ 24. – St. 443.
Vedomosti SND RSFSR i VS RSFSR. – 1990. – ¹ 23. – St. 279.
Vedomosti SND RSFSR i VS RSFSR. – 1990. – ¹ 25. – St. 312.
Vedomosti Verkhovnogo Soveta RSFSR. – 1989. – ¹ 44. – St. 1306.
Zakon SSSR ot 20.09.1972 «O statuse narodnykh deputatov v SSSR».
Vedomosti SND SSSR i VS SSSR. – 1989. – ¹ 29. – St. 567.
Vedomosti SND SSSR i VS SSSR. – 1989. – ¹ 9. – St. 223.
Vedomosti Verkhovnogo Soveta SSSR. – 1988. – ¹ 49. – St. 729.
Vedomosti Verkhovnogo Soveta RSFSR. – 1989. – ¹ 44. – St. 1305.
Vedomosti Verkhovnogo Soveta RSFSR. – 1984. – ¹ 27. – St. 909 (s posl. izm.).
Vedomosti Verkhovnogo Soveta SSSR. – 1980. – ¹ 27. – St. 545.
Vedomosti Verkhovnogo Soveta SSSR. – 1980. – ¹ 44. – St. 909.
Vedomosti Verkhovnogo Soveta SSSR. – 1979. – ¹ 49. – St. 842.
Vedomosti Verkhovnogo Soveta RSFSR. – 1978. – ¹ 15. – St. 407 (s posl. izm.)
Vedomosti Verkhovnogo Soveta SSSR. – 1978. – ¹ 28. – St. 441.
Vedomosti Verkhovnogo Soveta RSFSR. – 1978. – ¹ 32. – St. 845 (s posl. izm.).
Vedomosti Verkhovnogo Soveta SSSR. – 1977. – ¹ 41. – St. 617 (s posl. izm.).
Svod zakonov RSFSR. – 1988. – T. 1. – S. 763.
Vedomosti Verkhovnogo Soveta RSFSR. – 1971. – ¹ 31. – St. 653.
Vedomosti Verkhovnogo Soveta RSFSR. – 1971. – ¹ 31. – St. 654 (s posl. izm.).
Vedomosti Verkhovnogo Soveta SSSR. – 1972. – ¹ 39. – St. 347 (s posl. izm.).
Vinokurov A.Yu. Uchastie prokurora v administrativnom presledovanii lits, obladayushchikh osobym pravovym statusom, v sovetskiy period // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2016. – ¹ 9. - S. 32.
Sergeev I.P. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' sudey // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. – 2005. – ¹ 9. - S. 76.
Kazankov S.P. Konstitutsionno-pravovye garantii pri privlechenii k ugolovnoy i administrativnoy otvetstvennosti deputatov Gosudarstven-noy Dumy i chlenov Soveta Federatsii // Gosudarstvennaya vlast' i mestnoe samoupravlenie. – 2010. – ¹ 6. - S. 33-35.
Zhdanov N.M. Ob administrativnoy otvetstvennosti dolzhnostnykh lits, vypolnyayushchikh opredelennye gosudarstvennye funktsii // Administrativ-noe pravo i protsess. – 2013. – ¹ 9. – S. 33–37.
Gushchin V.Z. Osobennosti privlecheniya k administrativnoy otvetstvennosti chlenov Soveta Federatsii, deputatov Gosudarstvennoy Dumy i osobennosti prezidentskogo immuniteta ot privlecheniya k administrativnoy otvetstvennosti // Sovremennoe pravo. – 2013. – ¹ 8. – S. 21–23.
Aleshina I. Privlechenie sudey k administrativnoy, distsiplinarnoy i ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti // Zakonnost'. – 2005. – ¹ 6. - s. 89.
Vinokurov A.Yu. Uchastie prokurora v administrativnom presledovanii dolzhnostnykh lits, vypolnyayushchikh opredelennye gosudarstvennye funktsii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2013. – ¹ 1. – S. 30–35.
Vedomosti SND RSFSR i VS RSFSR. – 1991. – ¹ 45. – St. 1491 (s posl. izm.).
Vedomosti SND RSFSR i VS RSFSR. – 1991. – ¹ 30. – St. 1013 (s posl. izm.).

References (transliteration):
Vedomosti SND RSFSR i VS RSFSR. – 1991. – ¹ 19. – St. 621.
Vedomosti SND SSSR i VS SSSR. – 1989. – ¹ 29. – St. 572.
Vedomosti SND RSFSR i VS RSFSR. – 1991. – ¹ 17. – St. 510.
Vedomosti SND SSSR i VS SSSR. – 1990. – ¹ 24. – St. 443.
Vedomosti SND RSFSR i VS RSFSR. – 1990. – ¹ 23. – St. 279.
Vedomosti SND RSFSR i VS RSFSR. – 1990. – ¹ 25. – St. 312.
Vedomosti Verkhovnogo Soveta RSFSR. – 1989. – ¹ 44. – St. 1306.
Zakon SSSR ot 20.09.1972 «O statuse narodnykh deputatov v SSSR».
Vedomosti SND SSSR i VS SSSR. – 1989. – ¹ 29. – St. 567.
Vedomosti SND SSSR i VS SSSR. – 1989. – ¹ 9. – St. 223.
Vedomosti Verkhovnogo Soveta SSSR. – 1988. – ¹ 49. – St. 729.
Vedomosti Verkhovnogo Soveta RSFSR. – 1989. – ¹ 44. – St. 1305.
Vedomosti Verkhovnogo Soveta RSFSR. – 1984. – ¹ 27. – St. 909 (s posl. izm.).
Vedomosti Verkhovnogo Soveta SSSR. – 1980. – ¹ 27. – St. 545.
Vedomosti Verkhovnogo Soveta SSSR. – 1980. – ¹ 44. – St. 909.
Vedomosti Verkhovnogo Soveta SSSR. – 1979. – ¹ 49. – St. 842.
Vedomosti Verkhovnogo Soveta RSFSR. – 1978. – ¹ 15. – St. 407 (s posl. izm.)
Vedomosti Verkhovnogo Soveta SSSR. – 1978. – ¹ 28. – St. 441.
Vedomosti Verkhovnogo Soveta RSFSR. – 1978. – ¹ 32. – St. 845 (s posl. izm.).
Vedomosti Verkhovnogo Soveta SSSR. – 1977. – ¹ 41. – St. 617 (s posl. izm.).
Svod zakonov RSFSR. – 1988. – T. 1. – S. 763.
Vedomosti Verkhovnogo Soveta RSFSR. – 1971. – ¹ 31. – St. 653.
Vedomosti Verkhovnogo Soveta RSFSR. – 1971. – ¹ 31. – St. 654 (s posl. izm.).
Vedomosti Verkhovnogo Soveta SSSR. – 1972. – ¹ 39. – St. 347 (s posl. izm.).
Vinokurov A.Yu. Uchastie prokurora v administrativnom presledovanii lits, obladayushchikh osobym pravovym statusom, v sovetskiy period // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2016. – ¹ 9. - S. 32.
Sergeev I.P. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' sudey // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. – 2005. – ¹ 9. - S. 76.
Kazankov S.P. Konstitutsionno-pravovye garantii pri privlechenii k ugolovnoy i administrativnoy otvetstvennosti deputatov Gosudarstven-noy Dumy i chlenov Soveta Federatsii // Gosudarstvennaya vlast' i mestnoe samoupravlenie. – 2010. – ¹ 6. - S. 33-35.
Zhdanov N.M. Ob administrativnoy otvetstvennosti dolzhnostnykh lits, vypolnyayushchikh opredelennye gosudarstvennye funktsii // Administrativ-noe pravo i protsess. – 2013. – ¹ 9. – S. 33–37.
Gushchin V.Z. Osobennosti privlecheniya k administrativnoy otvetstvennosti chlenov Soveta Federatsii, deputatov Gosudarstvennoy Dumy i osobennosti prezidentskogo immuniteta ot privlecheniya k administrativnoy otvetstvennosti // Sovremennoe pravo. – 2013. – ¹ 8. – S. 21–23.
Aleshina I. Privlechenie sudey k administrativnoy, distsiplinarnoy i ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti // Zakonnost'. – 2005. – ¹ 6. - s. 89.
Vinokurov A.Yu. Uchastie prokurora v administrativnom presledovanii dolzhnostnykh lits, vypolnyayushchikh opredelennye gosudarstvennye funktsii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2013. – ¹ 1. – S. 30–35.
Vedomosti SND RSFSR i VS RSFSR. – 1991. – ¹ 45. – St. 1491 (s posl. izm.).
Vedomosti SND RSFSR i VS RSFSR. – 1991. – ¹ 30. – St. 1013 (s posl. izm.).

Abstract: The research subject is internal control of the activities of customs bodies of the Russian Federation, its legal regulation, directions and time frame, and the comparative analysis of internal and customs control. The author pays attention to the correlation between customs and internal control as the forms of government control. The common element for the both forms of control is the subject of control represented by a customs body. At the same time, the objects of customs and internal control, their objectives and consequences are different. Moreover, the paper defines the notion of external control which should be applied together with the internal one. The research methodology is based on the analysis of the current customs legislation and the scientific literature in this field. The author applies historical and comparative-legal methods. The author formulates the provisions about the correlation between customs and internal control and the balance between them as a basis for ensuring legality in the work of customs bodies of the Russian Federation. The author outlines the common features and the peculiarities of customs and internal control and comes to the conclusion that the observance of rights of the participants of customs legal relations is possible given that the optimal balance between internal and external control of the activities of customs bodies is preserved. 

Keywords: control time frame, customs legislation, legality, subjects of control, objects of control, government control, external control, customs bodies, customs control, internal control

References:
Federal'nyy zakon ot 27.11.2010 N 311-FZ (red. ot 13.07.2015) "O tamozhennom regulirovanii v Rossiyskoy Federatsii" (s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 19.10.2015) SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Tamozhennyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 28 maya 2003 g. ¹ 61-FZ (utratil silu). SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Rasporyazhenie FTS Rossii ot 12.07.2011 N118-r (red. ot 04.12.2012) "Ob utverzhdenii Metodicheskikh rekomendatsiy po provedeniyu vedomstvennogo kontrolya resheniy, deystviy (bezdeystviya) v oblasti tamozhennogo dela". SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Pravovoe regulirovanie gosudarstvennogo kontrolya: monografiya (otv. red. d-r yurid. nauk, prof., zasluzhennyy deyatel' nauki Rossiyskoy Federatsii A.F. Nozdrachev).-M.: "Institut zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya pri Pravitel'stve RF", 2013. SPS «Garant».
Postanovlenie Plenuma VAS RF ot 08.11.2013 N 79 "O nekotorykh voprosakh primeneniya tamozhennogo zakonodatel'stva" // "Vestnik VAS RF", N 1, yanvar', 2014.
Stolyarov D.A., Primenenie tamozhennogo zakonodatel'stva // Promyshlennost': bukhgalterskiy uchet i nalogooblozhenie. 2014. ¹ 1. SPS «Garant».
Trunina E.V. Kontrol'nye funktsii tamozhennykh organov: vidy, pravovoe regulirovanie, praktika realizatsii // Pravo i ekonomika. 2009. ¹ 6. SPS «Garant».
Tamozhennyy kodeks Tamozhennogo soyuza (red. ot 08.05.2015)(prilozhenie k Dogovoru o Tamozhennom kodekse Tamozhennogo soyuza, prinyatomu Resheniem Mezhgosudarstvennogo Soveta EvrAzES na urovne glav gosudarstv ot 27.11.2009 N 17). SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Prikaz FTS Rossii ot 08.11.2011 N 2263 (red. ot 26.09.2014) "Ob utverzhdenii Administrativnogo reglamenta Federal'noy tamozhennoy sluzhby po predostavleniyu gosudarstvennoy uslugi vydachi i otzyva kvalifikatsionnykh attestatov spetsialistov po tamozhennym operatsiyam" (Zaregistrirovano v Minyuste Rossii 22.02.2012 N 23315). SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Itogovyy doklad o rezul'tatakh i osnovnykh napravleniyakh deyatel'nosti Federal'noy tamozhennoy sluzhby na 2015 god i planovyy period 2016 – 2018 godov. Ofitsial'nyy sayt FTS Rossii. Elektronnyy resurs. http://customs.ru/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=20613:-2015-2016-2018-&catid=475:2015-03-12-09-57-15&Itemid=2588 (data obr. 24.12.2015).
Struktura tsentral'nogo apparata FTS Rossii. Ofitsial'nyy sayt FTS Rossii. Elektronnyy resurs. http://www.customs.ru/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=39%3A2011-01-12-20-24-55&catid=12&Itemid=1822 (data obr. 24.12.2015).
Kommentariy k Federal'nomu zakonu ot 27 noyabrya 2010 g. N 311-FZ "O tamozhennom regulirovanii v Rossiyskoy Federatsii" (postateynyy) (pod red. S.A. Ovsyannikova, G.N. Komkovoy) (Podgotovlen dlya sistemy Konsul'tantPlyus, 2012).
Ryzhova M.A. Vedomstvennyy kontrol' deyatel'nosti tamozhennykh organov kak sposob obespecheniya zakonnosti v oblasti tamozhennogo dela / Vestnik Rossiyskoy tamozhennoy akademii. 2014. ¹ 1. – S. 127.

References (transliteration):
Federal'nyy zakon ot 27.11.2010 N 311-FZ (red. ot 13.07.2015) "O tamozhennom regulirovanii v Rossiyskoy Federatsii" (s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 19.10.2015) SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Tamozhennyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 28 maya 2003 g. ¹ 61-FZ (utratil silu). SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Rasporyazhenie FTS Rossii ot 12.07.2011 N118-r (red. ot 04.12.2012) "Ob utverzhdenii Metodicheskikh rekomendatsiy po provedeniyu vedomstvennogo kontrolya resheniy, deystviy (bezdeystviya) v oblasti tamozhennogo dela". SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Pravovoe regulirovanie gosudarstvennogo kontrolya: monografiya (otv. red. d-r yurid. nauk, prof., zasluzhennyy deyatel' nauki Rossiyskoy Federatsii A.F. Nozdrachev).-M.: "Institut zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya pri Pravitel'stve RF", 2013. SPS «Garant».
Postanovlenie Plenuma VAS RF ot 08.11.2013 N 79 "O nekotorykh voprosakh primeneniya tamozhennogo zakonodatel'stva" // "Vestnik VAS RF", N 1, yanvar', 2014.
Stolyarov D.A., Primenenie tamozhennogo zakonodatel'stva // Promyshlennost': bukhgalterskiy uchet i nalogooblozhenie. 2014. ¹ 1. SPS «Garant».
Trunina E.V. Kontrol'nye funktsii tamozhennykh organov: vidy, pravovoe regulirovanie, praktika realizatsii // Pravo i ekonomika. 2009. ¹ 6. SPS «Garant».
Tamozhennyy kodeks Tamozhennogo soyuza (red. ot 08.05.2015)(prilozhenie k Dogovoru o Tamozhennom kodekse Tamozhennogo soyuza, prinyatomu Resheniem Mezhgosudarstvennogo Soveta EvrAzES na urovne glav gosudarstv ot 27.11.2009 N 17). SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Prikaz FTS Rossii ot 08.11.2011 N 2263 (red. ot 26.09.2014) "Ob utverzhdenii Administrativnogo reglamenta Federal'noy tamozhennoy sluzhby po predostavleniyu gosudarstvennoy uslugi vydachi i otzyva kvalifikatsionnykh attestatov spetsialistov po tamozhennym operatsiyam" (Zaregistrirovano v Minyuste Rossii 22.02.2012 N 23315). SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Itogovyy doklad o rezul'tatakh i osnovnykh napravleniyakh deyatel'nosti Federal'noy tamozhennoy sluzhby na 2015 god i planovyy period 2016 – 2018 godov. Ofitsial'nyy sayt FTS Rossii. Elektronnyy resurs. http://customs.ru/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=20613:-2015-2016-2018-&catid=475:2015-03-12-09-57-15&Itemid=2588 (data obr. 24.12.2015).
Struktura tsentral'nogo apparata FTS Rossii. Ofitsial'nyy sayt FTS Rossii. Elektronnyy resurs. http://www.customs.ru/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=39%3A2011-01-12-20-24-55&catid=12&Itemid=1822 (data obr. 24.12.2015).
Kommentariy k Federal'nomu zakonu ot 27 noyabrya 2010 g. N 311-FZ "O tamozhennom regulirovanii v Rossiyskoy Federatsii" (postateynyy) (pod red. S.A. Ovsyannikova, G.N. Komkovoy) (Podgotovlen dlya sistemy Konsul'tantPlyus, 2012).
Ryzhova M.A. Vedomstvennyy kontrol' deyatel'nosti tamozhennykh organov kak sposob obespecheniya zakonnosti v oblasti tamozhennogo dela / Vestnik Rossiyskoy tamozhennoy akademii. 2014. ¹ 1. – S. 127.

Abstract: The research subject is the range of issues of law enforcement activities of administrative and jurisdictional bodies in the context of adoption of the Administrative procedure code of the Russian Federation. The adoption of a new codified statutory instrument is an uncommon happening for the Russian law. But some practical matters are already appearing in the enforcement of this Code. The author considers such issues as the practice of conflict resolution between citizens and organizations, their legal nature, statistical analysis and judicial practice. The author applies such general scientific methods as dialectics, analysis, synthesis, deduction, induction. The author also applies specific scientific methods including comparative-legal, system-structural, and the system analysis. The author concludes that, despite the fact that the Code contains significant and interesting legal novels, the adopted Code hasn’t been completed. It doesn’t provide for the balance of public and private interests, and it is narrow. The Administrative procedure code needs a substantial enhancement. 

Keywords: scope of regulation, appeal, conflicts, private interests, public interests, balance of interests , act contestation, Administrative procedure code, administrative law, jurisprudence

References:
Luparev E.B. Obespechenie balansa publichnykh i chastnykh interesov v Kodekse administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva RF // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2015. ¹ 11.
Itogi raboty Upravleniya Rossel'khoznadzora po Krasnodarskomu krayu i Respublike Adygeya. // URL: http://rsn.krasnodar.ru/content/section/76/ (2015. 17 iyunya)
Nikolaev A.Yu. Novyy Kodeks administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva. Vzglyad "po diagonali" // Sayt professional'nogo soobshchestva yuristov i advokatov «Pravorub». 2015. 3 apr. URL: http://pravorub.ru/articles/46170.html (2015. 19 iyunya).
Nauchnye trudy doktora yurid. nauk, professora Yu.N. Starilova // Administrativnoe sudoproizvodstvo v Rossiyskoy Federatsii : razvitie teorii i formirovanie administrativno-protsessual'nogo zakonodatel'stva. Seriya : Yubilei, konferentsii, forumy. Vyp. 7 / otv. red. Yu. N. Starilov. Voronezh : Izd-vo Voronezh. gos. un-ta, 2013. 1060 s. S. 269-275.
Kalinina L.E. Gosposhlina pri litsenzirovanii: plata za tekhnicheskie oshibki // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2015. ¹4. S. 356-361
Kalinina L.E. Ubezhdenie kak metod gosudarstvennogo upravleniya ekonomikoy // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2014. ¹ 11. S. 1170-1174
V.D. Plesovskikh Tendentsii razvitiya federal'nogo administrativno-deliktnogo prava i zakonodatel'stva // Pravo i politika. - 2012. - 12. - C. 1990 - 1994.

References (transliteration):
Luparev E.B. Obespechenie balansa publichnykh i chastnykh interesov v Kodekse administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva RF // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2015. ¹ 11.
Itogi raboty Upravleniya Rossel'khoznadzora po Krasnodarskomu krayu i Respublike Adygeya. // URL: http://rsn.krasnodar.ru/content/section/76/ (2015. 17 iyunya)
Nikolaev A.Yu. Novyy Kodeks administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva. Vzglyad "po diagonali" // Sayt professional'nogo soobshchestva yuristov i advokatov «Pravorub». 2015. 3 apr. URL: http://pravorub.ru/articles/46170.html (2015. 19 iyunya).
Nauchnye trudy doktora yurid. nauk, professora Yu.N. Starilova // Administrativnoe sudoproizvodstvo v Rossiyskoy Federatsii : razvitie teorii i formirovanie administrativno-protsessual'nogo zakonodatel'stva. Seriya : Yubilei, konferentsii, forumy. Vyp. 7 / otv. red. Yu. N. Starilov. Voronezh : Izd-vo Voronezh. gos. un-ta, 2013. 1060 s. S. 269-275.
Kalinina L.E. Gosposhlina pri litsenzirovanii: plata za tekhnicheskie oshibki // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2015. ¹4. S. 356-361
Kalinina L.E. Ubezhdenie kak metod gosudarstvennogo upravleniya ekonomikoy // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2014. ¹ 11. S. 1170-1174
V.D. Plesovskikh Tendentsii razvitiya federal'nogo administrativno-deliktnogo prava i zakonodatel'stva // Pravo i politika. - 2012. - 12. - C. 1990 - 1994.

Abstract: The paper contains the analysis of the foreign experience of normative consolidation of the possibility to consider the cases of recourse against decisions, actions, or inactions of administrative bodies, related to the claims for indemnification, within administrative proceedings. The author studies the cases of Argentina, Armenia, Bulgaria, Georgia, India, Spain, Italy, China, Latvia, Lithuania, Portugal, Ukraine, France, Switzerland, and Estonia, and comes to the conclusion the most of them use the provision allowing considering the claims for indemnification for damage caused by decisions, actions, or inactions of administrative bodies or authorities together with the cases about declaring them illegal, i.e. within the same administrative process. The methodology is based on the methods of analysis and synthesis, the system and comparative-legal methods. The author analyzes the statutory instruments of foreign states and comes to the conclusion about the necessity to amend the Administrative Court Procedure Code of the Russian Federation with the provisions stipulating the possibility to consider the claims for indemnification of damage caused by the disputed decisions, actions, or inactions in the sphere of administrative or other public legal relations within administrative proceedings. 

Keywords: Administrative Court Procedure Code of the Russian, compensation of harm, foreign experience, administrative proceedings, Argentina, Armenia, Bulgaria, Georgia, Spain, France

References:
Administracinių Bylų Teisenos Įstatymas 1999 m. sausio 14 d. ¹ VIII-1029.
Civilinio kodekso patvirtinimo, įsigaliojimo ir įgyvendinimo.
Decreto-Lei ¹ 4/2015, de 7 de janeiro de 2015 – Código do procedimento administrativo (Novo).
Kodeks adm³n³strativnogo sudochinstva Ukra¿ni.
Code de justice administrative.
Administratīvā procesa likums // «Latvijas Vēstnesis». 14.11.2001. ¹ 164(2551).
Ley ¹ 39/2015, de 1 de octubre 2015, del Procedimiento Administrativo Común de las Administraciones Públicas // Boletín Oficial del Estado. 02.10.2015. ¹ 236.
Decreto Legislativo 2 luglio 2010, ¹ 104.
Administrative Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China.
The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.
საქართველოს ადმინისტრაციული საპროცესო კოდექსი.
Administrativno-protsesualen kodeks.
Օրենքը «Վարչարարության հիմունքների եվ վարչական վարույթի մասին», Ընդունվել է 18.02.2004.
Ley ¹ 12008 de la Provincia de Buenos Aires.
Halduskohtumenetluse seadustik.
Loi fédérale sur la procédure administrative du 20 décembre 1968 (Etat le 1er janvier 2015).

References (transliteration):
Administracinių Bylų Teisenos Įstatymas 1999 m. sausio 14 d. ¹ VIII-1029.
Civilinio kodekso patvirtinimo, įsigaliojimo ir įgyvendinimo.
Decreto-Lei ¹ 4/2015, de 7 de janeiro de 2015 – Código do procedimento administrativo (Novo).
Kodeks adm³n³strativnogo sudochinstva Ukra¿ni.
Code de justice administrative.
Administratīvā procesa likums // «Latvijas Vēstnesis». 14.11.2001. ¹ 164(2551).
Ley ¹ 39/2015, de 1 de octubre 2015, del Procedimiento Administrativo Común de las Administraciones Públicas // Boletín Oficial del Estado. 02.10.2015. ¹ 236.
Decreto Legislativo 2 luglio 2010, ¹ 104.
Administrative Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China.
The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.
საქართველოს ადმინისტრაციული საპროცესო კოდექსი.
Administrativno-protsesualen kodeks.
Օրենքը «Վարչարարության հիմունքների եվ վարչական վարույթի մասին», Ընդունվել է 18.02.2004.
Ley ¹ 12008 de la Provincia de Buenos Aires.
Halduskohtumenetluse seadustik.
Loi fédérale sur la procédure administrative du 20 décembre 1968 (Etat le 1er janvier 2015).

Abstract: The research subject is the stage of initiation of an administrative case. The research object is a pretest of information containing the essential elements of an administrative offence. The author considers such aspects of the topic as the stage of the pretest of information about the committed administrative offence and the order of activities of the subjects of administrative jurisdiction in this situation. Special attention is paid to the meaning of the elements of an administrative offence at the moment of deciding about the essence of the pretest of information containing the essential elements of an administrative offence. The author applies the methods of empirical, experimental-theoretical, and theoretical levels, i.e. comparison, generalization, analysis and synthesis, analogy, interviewing, and the logical method. The author comes to the following conclusions: the provisions of particular departmental statutory instruments, related to the order of consideration of reports and requests about administrative offences, contradict the provisions of the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation; there exists a legal gap hampering the definition of the period of duration of a pretest of actions (inactions) of persons for the purpose of detecting the essential elements of an administrative offence; an administrative case can be initiated, provided that there is a legal reason and information related to an objective side of the elements of an administrative offence, including the object and the objective side, but most factors, defining the moment when an administrative case is initiated, require the presence of a subject of an administrative offence. The scientific novelty lies in the study of changes in the legislation concerning the proceedings on the stage of an administrative case initiation.  

Keywords: administrative proceedings, elements of an administrative offences, reports and requests, pretest stage, instruction, response time, procedure of requests consideration, limitation period, parties of the proceedings, procedure

References:
Prikaz MVD Rossii ot 29.08.2014 ¹ 736 «Ob utverzhdenii Instruktsii o poryadke priema, registratsii i razresheniya v territorial'nykh organakh Ministerstva vnutrennikh del Rossiyskoy Federatsii zayavleniy i soobshcheniy o prestupleniyakh, ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh, o proisshestviyakh» (red. ot 29.08.2014) // Rossiyskaya gazeta – 2014 – 14 noyab.
Shilekhin K.E. Problemy vozbuzhdeniya del ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v oblasti nalogov i sborov (po materialam Omskoy i Novosibirskoy oblastey) // Gramota – 2014 – ¹ 5 (43) – ch. II – S. 202-206.
Tsukanov N. N. O vzaimosvyazi kachestva normativnogo obespecheniya i effektivnosti proizvodstva po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh, osushchestvlyaemogo organami vnutrennikh del // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess – 2011 – ¹ 2 – S. 29-32.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 02.05.2006 ¹ 59-FZ «O poryadke rassmotreniya obrashcheniy grazhdan Rossiyskoy Federatsii» (red. ot 24.11.2014) // Rossiyskaya gazeta – 2006 – 05 maya.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 24.03.2005 ¹ 5 «O nekotorykh voprosakh, voznikayushchikh u sudov pri primenenii Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh» (v red. ot 19.12.2013) // Rossiyskaya gazeta – 2005 – 19 apr.
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30.12.2001 ¹ 195-FZ (red. ot 05.10.2015) // Rossiyskaya gazeta – 2001 – 31 dek.

References (transliteration):
Prikaz MVD Rossii ot 29.08.2014 ¹ 736 «Ob utverzhdenii Instruktsii o poryadke priema, registratsii i razresheniya v territorial'nykh organakh Ministerstva vnutrennikh del Rossiyskoy Federatsii zayavleniy i soobshcheniy o prestupleniyakh, ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh, o proisshestviyakh» (red. ot 29.08.2014) // Rossiyskaya gazeta – 2014 – 14 noyab.
Shilekhin K.E. Problemy vozbuzhdeniya del ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v oblasti nalogov i sborov (po materialam Omskoy i Novosibirskoy oblastey) // Gramota – 2014 – ¹ 5 (43) – ch. II – S. 202-206.
Tsukanov N. N. O vzaimosvyazi kachestva normativnogo obespecheniya i effektivnosti proizvodstva po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh, osushchestvlyaemogo organami vnutrennikh del // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess – 2011 – ¹ 2 – S. 29-32.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 02.05.2006 ¹ 59-FZ «O poryadke rassmotreniya obrashcheniy grazhdan Rossiyskoy Federatsii» (red. ot 24.11.2014) // Rossiyskaya gazeta – 2006 – 05 maya.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 24.03.2005 ¹ 5 «O nekotorykh voprosakh, voznikayushchikh u sudov pri primenenii Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh» (v red. ot 19.12.2013) // Rossiyskaya gazeta – 2005 – 19 apr.
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30.12.2001 ¹ 195-FZ (red. ot 05.10.2015) // Rossiyskaya gazeta – 2001 – 31 dek.

Abstract: The research subject is the range of legal and organizational problems of administrative regulation of the procedure executed in the sphere of internal affairs. The author analyzes the concepts of legal regulation of procedural activities within the system of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation. The paper presents the author’s positions on the category “administrative procedure”. The main attention is paid to the development of methods and methodology of administrative regulation of positive relations in the sphere of internal affairs. The article demonstrates the author’s positions on the interpretation and legal regulation of these categories. The research methodology is based on the modern achievements in epistemology. The author applies general philosophical and theoretical methods (dialectics, the system method, analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, observation, and modeling), traditional methods of jurisprudence (formal-logical), and the methods of specific sociological research (statistical, expert assessment, etc.). The author comes to the conclusion that at present, in order to ensure law and order in the sphere of internal affairs, it is necessary to improve forms and methods of administrative regulation of procedural activities. The author claims that it is necessary to develop administrative regulation in the sphere of internal affairs. The novelty of the research lies in the proposals to develop forms and methods of administrative regulation in the sphere of internal affairs and to provide for legal and organizational guarantees of legality in the sphere of internal affairs. 

Keywords: procedure, scheme, process, Ministry of Internal Affairs, internal affairs bodies, police, sevice, regulation, employee, improvement, regulations, procedure, the process, MIA, ATS, police, service, regulation, employee, improvement

References:
Davydov K.V. Administrativnye reglamenty federal'nykh organov ispolnitel'noy vlasti Rossiyskoy Federatsii: voprosy teorii. – M., 2010. – S. 13.
Davydov K.V. Administrativnye reglamenty federal'nykh organov ispolnitel'noy vlasti Rossiyskoy Federatsii: voprosy teorii. – M., 2010. – S.14.
Buryaga V.O. Administrativnyy reglament v sfere realizatsii ispolnitel'noy vlasti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. – M., 2009. – S. 6.
Stakhov A.I. Razrabotka i primenenie administrativnykh reglamentov organov ispolnitel'noy vlasti // Aktual'nye problemy prepodavaniya sovremennogo administrativnogo prava: teoriya, praktika, metodika: Materialy nauchno-metodicheskogo seminara. – M., Saratov, 2010. – S. 11.
Kozlova L.S., Sadovskaya T.D. Administrativnye reglamenty kak pravovoe sredstvo preduprezhdeniya korruptsii // Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. – 2010. – ¹ 2. – S. 87.
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. Administrativnyy protsess i ego realizatsiya
v deyatel'nosti politsii // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2013. - 3. - C. 155 - 170. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.3.8995.
Agafonov S.I., Korobkin M.V. Administrativnye reglamenty i protsedury v sisteme MVD Rossii. // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2011. - 1. - C. 26 - 35.
Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V. Administrativnyy protsess i ego realizatsii v deyatel'nosti politsii // Politseyskaya i sledstvennaya deyatel'nost'. - 2013. - 4. - C. 1 - 44. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7810.2013.4.9250. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_9250.html

References (transliteration):
Davydov K.V. Administrativnye reglamenty federal'nykh organov ispolnitel'noy vlasti Rossiyskoy Federatsii: voprosy teorii. – M., 2010. – S. 13.
Davydov K.V. Administrativnye reglamenty federal'nykh organov ispolnitel'noy vlasti Rossiyskoy Federatsii: voprosy teorii. – M., 2010. – S.14.
Buryaga V.O. Administrativnyy reglament v sfere realizatsii ispolnitel'noy vlasti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. – M., 2009. – S. 6.
Stakhov A.I. Razrabotka i primenenie administrativnykh reglamentov organov ispolnitel'noy vlasti // Aktual'nye problemy prepodavaniya sovremennogo administrativnogo prava: teoriya, praktika, metodika: Materialy nauchno-metodicheskogo seminara. – M., Saratov, 2010. – S. 11.
Kozlova L.S., Sadovskaya T.D. Administrativnye reglamenty kak pravovoe sredstvo preduprezhdeniya korruptsii // Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. – 2010. – ¹ 2. – S. 87.
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. Administrativnyy protsess i ego realizatsiya
v deyatel'nosti politsii // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2013. - 3. - C. 155 - 170. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.3.8995.
Agafonov S.I., Korobkin M.V. Administrativnye reglamenty i protsedury v sisteme MVD Rossii. // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2011. - 1. - C. 26 - 35.
Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V. Administrativnyy protsess i ego realizatsii v deyatel'nosti politsii // Politseyskaya i sledstvennaya deyatel'nost'. - 2013. - 4. - C. 1 - 44. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7810.2013.4.9250. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_9250.html

Abstract: The subject of the research is a range of legal and organizational problems of proceedings on administrative offences in police. The object of the research includes social relations connected with implementation of the principles of proceedings on administrative offences in police. The author considers the procedural principles of the proceedings, paying attention to the necessity of improvement of a range of common principles. Special attention is paid to the principle of the presumption of innocence; the author notes that the Code of Administrative offences of the Russian Federation doesn’t define this principle clearly enough. Thus, the paper offers the ways of administrative proceedings enhancement. The methodology of the research is based on the recent achievements of epistemology. The author uses the general philosophical and theoretical methods (dialectics, the systems method, analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, observation, modeling), and the methods of special sociological research (statistical methods, expert assessments, etc.). The author concludes that administrative proceedings need to be improved, and the limits of the stages of these proceedings should be clarified. The author offers some methods which can improve the administrative proceedings in police. The novelty of the research is determined by the statement of the problem itself and the methodological grounds of its solution. The article proposes the ways of improvement of administrative proceedings in police. 

Keywords: administrative, jurisdiction, process, offence, implementation, police, proceedings, principle, Code of Administrative Offences, stage

References:
Yakimov A.Yu. Administrativno-yurisdiktsionnyy protsess i administrativno-yurisdiktsionnoe
Serebryakova I.M. Administrativno-yurisdiktsionnaya deyatel'nost' mili¬tsii Respubliki Belarus': avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Minsk, 1998. – S. 12.
Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V. Administrativnyy protsess i ego realizatsii v deyatel'nosti politsii // Politseyskaya i sledstvennaya deyatel'nost'. - 2013. - 4. - C. 1 - 44. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7810.2013.4.9250. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_9250.html
Kurakin A.V. Kompetentsiya politsii v sfere realizatsii zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 28 - 48. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.4.8841. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8841.html
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. Administrativnyy protsess
i ego realizatsiya
v deyatel'nosti politsii // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2013. - 3. - C. 155 - 170. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.3.8995.
Tadzhibov V.R. Protsessual'nye i material'nye osnovaniya administrativnoy otvetstvennosti v deyatel'nosti rossiyskoy politsii // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2014. - 5. - C. 424 - 431. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2014.5.12984.
Kurakin A.V. Administrativno-yurisdiktsionnaya deyatel'nost' politsii: problemy teorii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2014. - 3. - C. 259 - 271. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.3.11115.
Kurakin A.V., Badulin A.D., Tregubova E.V. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' za pravonarusheniya na rynke alkogolya i rol' politsii v ee realizatsii // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 10. - C. 28 - 74. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.10.10151. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_10151.html

References (transliteration):
Yakimov A.Yu. Administrativno-yurisdiktsionnyy protsess i administrativno-yurisdiktsionnoe
Serebryakova I.M. Administrativno-yurisdiktsionnaya deyatel'nost' mili¬tsii Respubliki Belarus': avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Minsk, 1998. – S. 12.
Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V. Administrativnyy protsess i ego realizatsii v deyatel'nosti politsii // Politseyskaya i sledstvennaya deyatel'nost'. - 2013. - 4. - C. 1 - 44. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7810.2013.4.9250. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_9250.html
Kurakin A.V. Kompetentsiya politsii v sfere realizatsii zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 28 - 48. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.4.8841. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8841.html
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. Administrativnyy protsess
i ego realizatsiya
v deyatel'nosti politsii // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2013. - 3. - C. 155 - 170. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.3.8995.
Tadzhibov V.R. Protsessual'nye i material'nye osnovaniya administrativnoy otvetstvennosti v deyatel'nosti rossiyskoy politsii // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2014. - 5. - C. 424 - 431. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2014.5.12984.
Kurakin A.V. Administrativno-yurisdiktsionnaya deyatel'nost' politsii: problemy teorii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2014. - 3. - C. 259 - 271. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.3.11115.
Kurakin A.V., Badulin A.D., Tregubova E.V. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' za pravonarusheniya na rynke alkogolya i rol' politsii v ee realizatsii // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 10. - C. 28 - 74. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.10.10151. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_10151.html

Abstract: The article considers the provisions of the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation in their “interpretation” which has formed in the law-enforcement practice. The author attempts to emphasize the necessity to develop the “updated” explanations by the Supreme Court of the provisions of the existing Code of Administrative Offences, since the positions of the Constitutional Court, expressed in its decisions, are not always considered properly by the law-enforcement bodies and executives; it results in the violation of the principle of legality in administrative proceedings. The main research method is comparative analysis which compares the existing law-enforcement practice with the corresponding explanation of the provisions of the Code expressed in the decisions of judicial bodies. The author comes to the conclusion about the “faulty” enforcement practice of certain provisions of the Code by the bodies and the executives, thus substantiating the inclusion of the “renewed” Supreme Court in the explanatory work together with the Constitutional Court. 

Keywords: consideration of a case, The constitutional court of the Russian Federation, the Supreme court of the Russian Federation, antimonopoly legislation, Executive authorities, administrative proceedings, the Constitution of the Russian Federation, administrative offence, institution of rejection, principle of legality

References:
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 24.03.2005 N 5 "O nekotorykh voprosakh, voznikayushchikh u sudov pri primenenii Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh" //Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF", N 6, 2005.
Postanovlenie Plenuma VAS RF ot 02.06.2004 N 10 "O nekotorykh voprosakh, voznikshikh v sudebnoy praktike pri rassmotrenii del ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh"//Vestnik VAS RF, N 8, 2004,
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh" ot 30.12.2001 N 195-FZ )Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF", 07.01.2002, N 1 (ch. 1), st. 1.
Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 16.07.2013 N 1180-O "Ob otkaze v prinyatii k rassmotreniyu zhaloby grazhdanina Ryabinina Denisa Aleksandrovicha na narushenie ego konstitutsionnykh prav chast'yu 1 stat'i 25.1, stat'yami 25.6 i 25.12 Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh" //SPS Konsul'tant-Plyus
V.D. Plesovskikh Tendentsii razvitiya federal'nogo administrativno-
deliktnogo prava i zakonodatel'stva // Pravo i politika. - 2012. - 12. - C. 1990 - 1994.
Kozhevnikov O.A. Nekotorye voprosy primeneniya v sudebnoy i pravoprimenitel'noy praktike normativnykh aktov, ne otvechayushchikh trebovaniyam ch.3 st. 15 Konstitutsii RF // Pravo i politika. - 2014. - 9. - C. 1470 - 1474. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.9.12350.

References (transliteration):
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 24.03.2005 N 5 "O nekotorykh voprosakh, voznikayushchikh u sudov pri primenenii Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh" //Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF", N 6, 2005.
Postanovlenie Plenuma VAS RF ot 02.06.2004 N 10 "O nekotorykh voprosakh, voznikshikh v sudebnoy praktike pri rassmotrenii del ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh"//Vestnik VAS RF, N 8, 2004,
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh" ot 30.12.2001 N 195-FZ )Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF", 07.01.2002, N 1 (ch. 1), st. 1.
Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 16.07.2013 N 1180-O "Ob otkaze v prinyatii k rassmotreniyu zhaloby grazhdanina Ryabinina Denisa Aleksandrovicha na narushenie ego konstitutsionnykh prav chast'yu 1 stat'i 25.1, stat'yami 25.6 i 25.12 Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh" //SPS Konsul'tant-Plyus
V.D. Plesovskikh Tendentsii razvitiya federal'nogo administrativno-
deliktnogo prava i zakonodatel'stva // Pravo i politika. - 2012. - 12. - C. 1990 - 1994.
Kozhevnikov O.A. Nekotorye voprosy primeneniya v sudebnoy i pravoprimenitel'noy praktike normativnykh aktov, ne otvechayushchikh trebovaniyam ch.3 st. 15 Konstitutsii RF // Pravo i politika. - 2014. - 9. - C. 1470 - 1474. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.9.12350.

Abstract: The author notes that according to the range of embodied social relations administrative process is rather wide; moreover, legal procedure is implemented by a large number of police officers, each of them is responsible for the particular aspect of procedural activity. Therefore, the author observes that at present the methodological provision of this sphere of Russian police activities is necessary. The methodology of the research is based on the recent achievements of epistemology. The author uses the theoretical and general scientific methods of cognition (dialectics, the system method, analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, observation, modeling), the traditional legal methods (formal-logical), and the methods used in special sociological research (the statistical method, expert assessments, etc.). The author notes that administrative proceeding in the police bodies is a jurisdictional process. It is argued that its main task is a procedural provision of measures of application of state coercion, particularly, of administrative punishment. The peculiarities of administrative proceeding in the police bodies depend on a range of factors, such as the completeness, the temporal and territorial criteria, the use of certain types of administrative punishment, and the different categories of persons.

Keywords: participant, form, coercion, police, stage, jurisdiction, process, proceedings, offence, responsibility

References:
Bakhrakh D.N. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' grazhdan v SSSR. Sverdlovsk, 1989.
Bakhrakh D.N., Renov E.N. Proizvodstvo po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh. M., 1989.
Bakhrakh D.N. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost'. M., 1999.
Vasil'ev A.S., Orzikh M.F. K voprosu o sootnoshenii i otraslevoy prinadlezhnosti administrativnogo protsessa i proizvodstva po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Proizvodstvo po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v organakh vnutrennikh del. Kiev, 1983.
Galagan I.A. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' v SSSR (protsessual'noe regulirovanie). Voronezh, 1976.
Dyad'kin O.N. Pravovoy status litsa, privlekaemogo k administrativnoy otvetstvennosti (po materialam administrativnoy praktiki organov vnutrennikh del): dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2001.
Korenev A.P. Normy administrativnogo prava i ikh primenenie. M., 1978.
Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V. Administrativnyy protsess i ego realizatsii v deyatel'nosti politsii // NB: Rossiyskoe politseyskoe pravo. - 2013. - 4. - C. 1 - 44. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4218.2013.4.9250. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_9250.html
Tadzhibov V.R. K voprosu o soderzhaii administrativno-yurisdiktsionnoy deyatel'nosti politsii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2014. - 9. - C. 955 - 959. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.9.12675.
Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V., Obydenov V.V. K voprosu o sootnoshenii ponyatiy «administrativnyy protsess» i «administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya» v deyatel'nosti politsii // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2014. - 2. - C. 179 - 190. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2014.2.11172.
Kurakin A.V. Kompetentsiya politsii v sfere realizatsii zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 28 - 48. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.4.8841. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8841.html
Kurakin A.V. Administrativno-yurisdiktsionnaya deyatel'nost' politsii: problemy teorii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2014. - 3. - C. 259 - 271. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.3.11115.

References (transliteration):
Bakhrakh D.N. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' grazhdan v SSSR. Sverdlovsk, 1989.
Bakhrakh D.N., Renov E.N. Proizvodstvo po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh. M., 1989.
Bakhrakh D.N. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost'. M., 1999.
Vasil'ev A.S., Orzikh M.F. K voprosu o sootnoshenii i otraslevoy prinadlezhnosti administrativnogo protsessa i proizvodstva po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Proizvodstvo po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v organakh vnutrennikh del. Kiev, 1983.
Galagan I.A. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' v SSSR (protsessual'noe regulirovanie). Voronezh, 1976.
Dyad'kin O.N. Pravovoy status litsa, privlekaemogo k administrativnoy otvetstvennosti (po materialam administrativnoy praktiki organov vnutrennikh del): dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2001.
Korenev A.P. Normy administrativnogo prava i ikh primenenie. M., 1978.
Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V. Administrativnyy protsess i ego realizatsii v deyatel'nosti politsii // NB: Rossiyskoe politseyskoe pravo. - 2013. - 4. - C. 1 - 44. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4218.2013.4.9250. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_9250.html
Tadzhibov V.R. K voprosu o soderzhaii administrativno-yurisdiktsionnoy deyatel'nosti politsii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2014. - 9. - C. 955 - 959. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.9.12675.
Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V., Obydenov V.V. K voprosu o sootnoshenii ponyatiy «administrativnyy protsess» i «administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya» v deyatel'nosti politsii // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2014. - 2. - C. 179 - 190. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2014.2.11172.
Kurakin A.V. Kompetentsiya politsii v sfere realizatsii zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 28 - 48. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.4.8841. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8841.html
Kurakin A.V. Administrativno-yurisdiktsionnaya deyatel'nost' politsii: problemy teorii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2014. - 3. - C. 259 - 271. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.3.11115.

Abstract: The subject of the research is the goods which have been under customs supervision for a long period of time. The goods kept in holding are sometimes put under customs supervision with the violation of the set time. In order not to keep such goods endlessly, actions should be taken to launch them out of the storehouse and to dispose of them. The disposal can be implemented in three ways: on the base of civil, administrative, and customs law. On the base of the study of different ways of disposal the author notes the positive and the negative sides of each of them. The author outlines the difficulties of realization of this procedure due to the certain regulations discordance with each other. Each of the branches of legislation contains special procedure of such goods disposal. The article studies the procedures of disposal specified in different branches of legislation and compares them in accordance with their results and methods. The author compares the procedures, notes their advantages and disadvantages. The main procedure is recognition of goods as waifs. This procedure takes a lot of time and not necessarily leads to the recognition of the property as ownerless. The use of more simple “administrative” procedures is limited. The courts not always confiscate such goods, not all the types of administrative offences entail sanctions in the form of confiscation. The implementation of international regulations of customs legislation for the disposal of arrested goods is neither implemented due to the absence of the authorities of the Federal Agency of State Property Management. Moreover, there are unsolved contradictions and gaps in customs legislation, particularly according to the issue of reimbursement of expenses in case of destruction of arrested goods since it is presupposed that the expenses will be covered by law-abiding individuals. 

Keywords: detention, customs control, confiscation, holding, destruction, the Federal Agency of State Property Management, disposal, expenses, holding, owner

References:
Vedomstvennaya statisticheskaya otchetnost' Federal'noy sluzhby sudebnykh pristavov // http://fssprus.ru/statistics/ (data obrashcheniya 21.09.2014).
Opredelenie Rostovskogo oblastnogo suda ot 26.01.2012 po delu ¹ 33-1043.
Garaev A.A. Obespechenie zakonnosti pri rasporyazhenii zaderzhannymi tovarami // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. — 2014.-¹ 3.-S.219-224. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.3.10845.
Proekt Federal'nogo zakona ¹ 377406-6 «O vnesenii izmeneniy v stat'i 190 i 191 Federal'nogo zakona "O tamozhennom regulirovanii v Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc;base=PRJ;n=112058;div=LAW;mb=LAW;opt=1;ts=D8C3CAC4C3D226769D3449BDBA5D7B82;rnd=0.8679218105909875 (data obrashcheniya 21.09.2014).
Tamozhennyy kodeks Tamozhennogo soyuza, p. 1 st. 167// Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 2010. ¹ 50. St. 6615.
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 12.05.2011 ¹ 7-P «Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti punkta 1 stat'i 15 i punkta 1 stat'i 164 Tamozhennogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii v svyazi s zhaloboy grazhdanina V.V. Kostenko».
Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 17.11.2011 ¹ 1487-O-O «Ob otkaze v prinyatii k rassmotreniyu zhaloby grazhdanina Khudaynazarova Murata Reimnazarovicha na narushenie ego konstitutsionnykh prav polozheniyami statey 150, 153 i 195 Tamozhennogo kodeksa tamozhennogo soyuza».
Garaev A.A. Uderzhanie tamozhennykh poshlin, nalogov s summ, poluchennykh ot realizatsii tovarov, zaderzhannykh tamozhennymi organami // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. - 2014. - 3. - C. 270 - 277. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8688.2014.3.11386.
Garaev A.A. Administrativnaya konfiskatsiya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2014. - 8. - C. 788 - 796. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.8.12185.
Molchanov A.A. K voprosu ob opredelenii predmeta administrativnogo pravonarusheniya pri soobshchenii tamozhennomu organu nedostovernykh svedeniy
o vvezennom (vyvozimom) tovare. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2010. - 11. - C. 54 - 57.

References (transliteration):
Vedomstvennaya statisticheskaya otchetnost' Federal'noy sluzhby sudebnykh pristavov // http://fssprus.ru/statistics/ (data obrashcheniya 21.09.2014).
Opredelenie Rostovskogo oblastnogo suda ot 26.01.2012 po delu ¹ 33-1043.
Garaev A.A. Obespechenie zakonnosti pri rasporyazhenii zaderzhannymi tovarami // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. — 2014.-¹ 3.-S.219-224. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.3.10845.
Proekt Federal'nogo zakona ¹ 377406-6 «O vnesenii izmeneniy v stat'i 190 i 191 Federal'nogo zakona "O tamozhennom regulirovanii v Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc;base=PRJ;n=112058;div=LAW;mb=LAW;opt=1;ts=D8C3CAC4C3D226769D3449BDBA5D7B82;rnd=0.8679218105909875 (data obrashcheniya 21.09.2014).
Tamozhennyy kodeks Tamozhennogo soyuza, p. 1 st. 167// Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 2010. ¹ 50. St. 6615.
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 12.05.2011 ¹ 7-P «Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti punkta 1 stat'i 15 i punkta 1 stat'i 164 Tamozhennogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii v svyazi s zhaloboy grazhdanina V.V. Kostenko».
Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 17.11.2011 ¹ 1487-O-O «Ob otkaze v prinyatii k rassmotreniyu zhaloby grazhdanina Khudaynazarova Murata Reimnazarovicha na narushenie ego konstitutsionnykh prav polozheniyami statey 150, 153 i 195 Tamozhennogo kodeksa tamozhennogo soyuza».
Garaev A.A. Uderzhanie tamozhennykh poshlin, nalogov s summ, poluchennykh ot realizatsii tovarov, zaderzhannykh tamozhennymi organami // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. - 2014. - 3. - C. 270 - 277. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8688.2014.3.11386.
Garaev A.A. Administrativnaya konfiskatsiya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2014. - 8. - C. 788 - 796. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.8.12185.
Molchanov A.A. K voprosu ob opredelenii predmeta administrativnogo pravonarusheniya pri soobshchenii tamozhennomu organu nedostovernykh svedeniy
o vvezennom (vyvozimom) tovare. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2010. - 11. - C. 54 - 57.

Abstract: The article is devoted to the analysis of the principle of competitiveness in the proceedings on administrative offences. The author pays special attention to the problems of implementation of this principle in the proceedings on administrative offences in the sphere of antimonopoly legislation. The methodology of the study is based on accumulation of general and special scientific methods and techniques used in juridical science in general, namely the dialectical, historical, structural and systematic, comparative legal, statistical, formal and logical analysis and the system method. The scientific novelty of this study lies in the fact that the author attempts to analyze the influence of the principle of competitiveness on the proceedings on administrative offences cases as well as to identify the problems of implementation of the principle of competitiveness during the implementation of administrative-jurisdictional process by the authorized bodies of executive power, in particular when considering the antitrust legislation violation case by the Commission of the Antimonopoly body.

Keywords: administrative process, administrative jurisdiction, administrative offence, antimonopoly regulation, principles, process, compettitiveness, proof, problems of implementation, principle of competitiveness

References:
Mikulin A.I. Printsip sostyazatel'nosti v proizvodstve po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo.-2010.-10.-C. 64-72.
Sumenkov, S. S. Antimonopol'nyy protsess kak kvazisudebnyy administrativno-yurisdiktsionnyy protsess //Biznes, Menedzhment i Pravo.-2014.-¹ 1.-S.114 – 116.
Konkurentnoe pravo Rossii: uchebnik [Tekst]/D. A. Aleshin, I. Yu. Artem'ev, E. Yu. Borzilo i dr. – M.: Izd. dom Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki, 2012. S.318.
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 14 fevralya 2000 g. N 2-P//Vestnik Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF. 2000. N 3; Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 12 aprelya 2005 g. N 113-O//Rossiyskaya gazeta. 31.05.2005. N 114.
Panova I.V. Administrativno-protsessual'naya deyatel'nost' v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Saratov, 2001. S.48-49.
Lukin V.P. Zayavlenie Upolnomochennogo po pravam cheloveka v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 21.10.2009. N 5023.
Zelentsov A. Administrativnoe sudoproizvodstvo v Rossii: problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya. S.85;
Popov L.L., Shergin A.P. Upravlenie. Grazhdanin. Otvetstvennost'. L., 1975. S.137.
Vasil'ev F.P. Dokazyvanie po delu ob administrativnom pravonarushenii: Avtoref. dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 2005. S.25; Panova I.V. Administrativno-protsessual'noe pravo Rossii. M.,2003. S.116; Yakimov A.Yu. Printsipy administrativno-yurisdiktsionnogo protsessa//Gosudarstvo i pravo. 1999. N5. S.8.
Simonyan S.L. O proekte Kodeksa administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii//Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2006.N 1.S.44.
Demin A.A. Kodeks administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva v RF ili vse zhe Administrativno-protsessual'nyy Kodeks//Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie problemy administrativnogo pravosudiya.-M.:Mezhdunarodnaya akademiya otsenki i konsaltinga,2006. S.250–259.

References (transliteration):
Mikulin A.I. Printsip sostyazatel'nosti v proizvodstve po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo.-2010.-10.-C. 64-72.
Sumenkov, S. S. Antimonopol'nyy protsess kak kvazisudebnyy administrativno-yurisdiktsionnyy protsess //Biznes, Menedzhment i Pravo.-2014.-¹ 1.-S.114 – 116.
Konkurentnoe pravo Rossii: uchebnik [Tekst]/D. A. Aleshin, I. Yu. Artem'ev, E. Yu. Borzilo i dr. – M.: Izd. dom Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki, 2012. S.318.
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 14 fevralya 2000 g. N 2-P//Vestnik Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF. 2000. N 3; Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 12 aprelya 2005 g. N 113-O//Rossiyskaya gazeta. 31.05.2005. N 114.
Panova I.V. Administrativno-protsessual'naya deyatel'nost' v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Saratov, 2001. S.48-49.
Lukin V.P. Zayavlenie Upolnomochennogo po pravam cheloveka v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 21.10.2009. N 5023.
Zelentsov A. Administrativnoe sudoproizvodstvo v Rossii: problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya. S.85;
Popov L.L., Shergin A.P. Upravlenie. Grazhdanin. Otvetstvennost'. L., 1975. S.137.
Vasil'ev F.P. Dokazyvanie po delu ob administrativnom pravonarushenii: Avtoref. dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 2005. S.25; Panova I.V. Administrativno-protsessual'noe pravo Rossii. M.,2003. S.116; Yakimov A.Yu. Printsipy administrativno-yurisdiktsionnogo protsessa//Gosudarstvo i pravo. 1999. N5. S.8.
Simonyan S.L. O proekte Kodeksa administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii//Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2006.N 1.S.44.
Demin A.A. Kodeks administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva v RF ili vse zhe Administrativno-protsessual'nyy Kodeks//Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie problemy administrativnogo pravosudiya.-M.:Mezhdunarodnaya akademiya otsenki i konsaltinga,2006. S.250–259.

Abstract: The subject of the research includes administrative procedures within the custom authorities' fulfilment of the state function of custom registration of intellectual property objects by the Federal Custom Service of Russia. The function in question includes a range of administrative procedures connected with receiving and consideration of the rightholders' applications, registration of intellectual property objects, excluding them from the Custom Register, amending of the Register, publication of the Register, informing custom authorities and interested parties of the Register, interaction between custom authorities and state authorities, citizens and organizations on the issues connected with the Register. The methodology of the research is based on the analysis of normative-legal acts in the sphere of transboundary protection of intellectual property rights and on the problem-chronological and structural methods. The novelty of the research lies in the fact that the author is the first  who considers administrative procedures of custom authorities in the process of fulfilment of the function of intellectual property rights protection on the base of the mechanism of work with the Custom Register of Intellectual Property Objects of Russia. On the base of the research the author offers the measures of administrative procedures optimization. In the conclusion the author offers the directions of enhancement of the administrative procedures in question which can give the opportunity to simplify the interrelations between rightholders and custom authorities and to improve the efficiency of the existing mechanism of transboundary protection of intellectual property objects by custom authorities. 

Keywords: custom authorities, administrative procedures, Custom register, Federal Custom Service of Russia, intellectual property, administrative regulation, Rospatent, optimization, rightholder, trademark

References:
Federal'nyy zakon ot 27.11.2010 ¹ 311-FZ (red. ot 04.06.2014) "O tamozhennom regulirovanii v Rossiyskoy Federatsii". SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Chechel'nitskiy I.V. K voprosu o ponyatii mezhdunarodnogo tamozhennogo prava // Tamozhennoe delo. 2013. ¹
S. 37. 3.Prikaz FTS RF ot 13.08.2009 ¹ 1488 "Ob utverzhdenii Administrativnogo reglamenta Federal'noy tamozhennoy sluzhby po ispolneniyu gosudarstvennoy funktsii po vedeniyu tamozhennogo reestra ob'ektov intellektual'noy sobstvennosti" (Zaregistrirovano v Minyuste RF 14.12.2009 ¹ 15592). SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Agamagomedova S.A. Kharakteristika tamozhennykh uslug, okazyvaemykh v ramkakh obespecheniya tamozhennymi organami prav intellektual'noy sobstvennosti // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. — 2014.-¹ 2.-S.165-172. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.2.9938; Agamagomedova S.A. Sootnoshenie ponyatiy «tamozhennyy kontrol'» i «tamozhennaya usluga» (na primere obespecheniya tamozhennymi organami funktsii po zashchite intellektual'noy sobstvennosti» // Tamozhennoe delo. 2013. ¹ 3. – S. 2-7.
Prikaz FTS Rossii ot 09.06.2012 ¹ 1128 "Ob utverzhdenii Administrativnogo reglamenta Federal'noy tamozhennoy sluzhby po predostavleniyu gosudarstvennoy uslugi po informirovaniyu ob aktakh tamozhennogo zakonodatel'stva Tamozhennogo soyuza, zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii o tamozhennom dele i ob inykh pravovykh aktakh Rossiyskoy Federatsii v oblasti tamozhennogo dela i konsul'tirovaniyu po voprosam tamozhennogo dela i inym voprosam, vkhodyashchim v kompetentsiyu tamozhennykh organov". SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus». (Zaregistrirovano v Minyuste Rossii 10.07.2012 ¹ 24873). SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Aleksandrov D.L. Sovershenstvovanie upravleniya deyatel'nost'yu tamozhennykh organov pri predostavlenii tamozhennykh uslug // Vestnik Rossiyskoy tamozhennoy akademii. 2013. ¹ 2. S. 69 – 75; Gupanova Yu.E. Monitoring rezul'tativnosti funktsionirovaniya sistemy upravleniya kachestvom tamozhennykh uslug // Vestnik Rossiyskoy tamozhennoy akademii. 2013. ¹ 4. S. 11 – 17; Zhigun L.A. Vyyavlenie faktorov, opredelyayushchikh kachestvo upravleniya gosudarstvennymi tamozhennymi uslugami // Vestnik Rossiyskoy tamozhennoy akademii. 2013. ¹ 3. S. 30 – 39; Trunina E.V. Administrativnye reglamenty kak pravovaya forma osushchestvleniya tamozhennymi organami gosudarstvennogo kontrolya // Pravo i ekonomika. 2012. ¹ 1. S. 53-59. Trunina E.V. Administrativnye protsedury ispolnitel'no-rasporyaditel'noy deyatel'nosti tamozhennykh organov: problemy opredeleniya // Sovremennoe pravo. 2012. ¹ 4. S. 49-53. Trunina E.V. Administrativnye reglamenty v oblasti tamozhennogo dela: voprosy metodologii // Pravo i ekonomika. 2013. ¹ 12. S. 50-57. Trunina E.V. Sovershenstvovanie pravovogo regulirovaniya gosudarstvennoy uslugi tamozhennykh organov po informirovaniyu i konsul'tirovaniyu naseleniya // Sovremennoe pravo. 2012. ¹
S. 65 – 69 i dr. 7.Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 16.09.2013 ¹ 809 (red. ot 02.11.2013) "O Federal'noy tamozhennoy sluzhbe" (vmeste s "Polozheniem o Federal'noy tamozhennoy sluzhbe"). SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Tamozhennyy kodeks Tamozhennogo soyuza (prilozhenie k Dogovoru o Tamozhennom kodekse Tamozhennogo soyuza, prinyatomu Resheniem Mezhgosudarstvennogo Soveta EvrAzES na urovne glav gosudarstv ot 27.11.2009 ¹ 17) (red. ot 16.04.2010). SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Agamagomedova S.A. Rol' pravoobladatelya v administrativnom mekhanizme zashchity prav na ob'ekty intellektual'noy sobstvennosti, osushchestvlyaemoy tamozhennymi organami // Khozyaystvo i pravo. 2014. ¹ 2 (445). – S. 71-80.
Reshenie Komissii Tamozhennogo soyuza ot 20.09.2010 ¹ 378 (red. ot 25.02.2014) "O klassifikatorakh, ispol'zuemykh dlya zapolneniya tamozhennykh deklaratsiy" (s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 01.07.2014) / Elektronnyy resurs. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Agamagomedova S.A. Poryadok deystviy tamozhennykh organov RF po zashchite prav na ob'ekty intellektual'noy sobstvennosti i ego optimizatsiya v sovremennykh usloviyakh // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. — 2014.-¹ 6.-S.559-568. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.6.10860.

References (transliteration):
Federal'nyy zakon ot 27.11.2010 ¹ 311-FZ (red. ot 04.06.2014) "O tamozhennom regulirovanii v Rossiyskoy Federatsii". SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Chechel'nitskiy I.V. K voprosu o ponyatii mezhdunarodnogo tamozhennogo prava // Tamozhennoe delo. 2013. ¹
S. 37. 3.Prikaz FTS RF ot 13.08.2009 ¹ 1488 "Ob utverzhdenii Administrativnogo reglamenta Federal'noy tamozhennoy sluzhby po ispolneniyu gosudarstvennoy funktsii po vedeniyu tamozhennogo reestra ob'ektov intellektual'noy sobstvennosti" (Zaregistrirovano v Minyuste RF 14.12.2009 ¹ 15592). SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Agamagomedova S.A. Kharakteristika tamozhennykh uslug, okazyvaemykh v ramkakh obespecheniya tamozhennymi organami prav intellektual'noy sobstvennosti // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. — 2014.-¹ 2.-S.165-172. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.2.9938; Agamagomedova S.A. Sootnoshenie ponyatiy «tamozhennyy kontrol'» i «tamozhennaya usluga» (na primere obespecheniya tamozhennymi organami funktsii po zashchite intellektual'noy sobstvennosti» // Tamozhennoe delo. 2013. ¹ 3. – S. 2-7.
Prikaz FTS Rossii ot 09.06.2012 ¹ 1128 "Ob utverzhdenii Administrativnogo reglamenta Federal'noy tamozhennoy sluzhby po predostavleniyu gosudarstvennoy uslugi po informirovaniyu ob aktakh tamozhennogo zakonodatel'stva Tamozhennogo soyuza, zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii o tamozhennom dele i ob inykh pravovykh aktakh Rossiyskoy Federatsii v oblasti tamozhennogo dela i konsul'tirovaniyu po voprosam tamozhennogo dela i inym voprosam, vkhodyashchim v kompetentsiyu tamozhennykh organov". SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus». (Zaregistrirovano v Minyuste Rossii 10.07.2012 ¹ 24873). SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Aleksandrov D.L. Sovershenstvovanie upravleniya deyatel'nost'yu tamozhennykh organov pri predostavlenii tamozhennykh uslug // Vestnik Rossiyskoy tamozhennoy akademii. 2013. ¹ 2. S. 69 – 75; Gupanova Yu.E. Monitoring rezul'tativnosti funktsionirovaniya sistemy upravleniya kachestvom tamozhennykh uslug // Vestnik Rossiyskoy tamozhennoy akademii. 2013. ¹ 4. S. 11 – 17; Zhigun L.A. Vyyavlenie faktorov, opredelyayushchikh kachestvo upravleniya gosudarstvennymi tamozhennymi uslugami // Vestnik Rossiyskoy tamozhennoy akademii. 2013. ¹ 3. S. 30 – 39; Trunina E.V. Administrativnye reglamenty kak pravovaya forma osushchestvleniya tamozhennymi organami gosudarstvennogo kontrolya // Pravo i ekonomika. 2012. ¹ 1. S. 53-59. Trunina E.V. Administrativnye protsedury ispolnitel'no-rasporyaditel'noy deyatel'nosti tamozhennykh organov: problemy opredeleniya // Sovremennoe pravo. 2012. ¹ 4. S. 49-53. Trunina E.V. Administrativnye reglamenty v oblasti tamozhennogo dela: voprosy metodologii // Pravo i ekonomika. 2013. ¹ 12. S. 50-57. Trunina E.V. Sovershenstvovanie pravovogo regulirovaniya gosudarstvennoy uslugi tamozhennykh organov po informirovaniyu i konsul'tirovaniyu naseleniya // Sovremennoe pravo. 2012. ¹
S. 65 – 69 i dr. 7.Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 16.09.2013 ¹ 809 (red. ot 02.11.2013) "O Federal'noy tamozhennoy sluzhbe" (vmeste s "Polozheniem o Federal'noy tamozhennoy sluzhbe"). SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Tamozhennyy kodeks Tamozhennogo soyuza (prilozhenie k Dogovoru o Tamozhennom kodekse Tamozhennogo soyuza, prinyatomu Resheniem Mezhgosudarstvennogo Soveta EvrAzES na urovne glav gosudarstv ot 27.11.2009 ¹ 17) (red. ot 16.04.2010). SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Agamagomedova S.A. Rol' pravoobladatelya v administrativnom mekhanizme zashchity prav na ob'ekty intellektual'noy sobstvennosti, osushchestvlyaemoy tamozhennymi organami // Khozyaystvo i pravo. 2014. ¹ 2 (445). – S. 71-80.
Reshenie Komissii Tamozhennogo soyuza ot 20.09.2010 ¹ 378 (red. ot 25.02.2014) "O klassifikatorakh, ispol'zuemykh dlya zapolneniya tamozhennykh deklaratsiy" (s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 01.07.2014) / Elektronnyy resurs. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Agamagomedova S.A. Poryadok deystviy tamozhennykh organov RF po zashchite prav na ob'ekty intellektual'noy sobstvennosti i ego optimizatsiya v sovremennykh usloviyakh // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. — 2014.-¹ 6.-S.559-568. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.6.10860.

Abstract: The author analyzes the administrative proceedings of public authorities in the sphere of cultural heritage in some particular cases (harmonization of projects, licensure of preservation works, carrying out historical-cultural expertise, organization of state protection) and the procedure of appeal against these proceedings. The article reveals the essential problems of the process of appeal (legal expertise), of the legislation in the sphere of cultural heritage objects (relating to regulation of particular actions), of the competencies of the authorized bodies (including the abuse of authority). The author uses the general scientific methods: from the abstract to the concrete, induction, deduction, analysis, synthesis, the comparative-legal method, the system approach. The scientific originality is based on the very formulation of the problem in this sphere, in carrying out of the comparative analysis of the existing legislation and the judicial and administrative practice of this legislation application and in the solutions suggested: the necessity of legal expertise in such cases, the prohibition of substitution of the authorized body by the court, the shortening of the list of “discretionary” authorities of a public body, and of the legislative support of some terms.

Keywords: cultural heritage object, appeal, administrative procedure, discretionary authorities, corruption factor, historical- cultural expertise, preservation works, inclusion in the list, subject of protection, restrictions/burdens.

References:
Ob ob'ektakh kul'turnogo naslediya (pamyatnikakh istorii i kul'tury) narodov Rossiyskoy Federatsii : Federal'nyy zakon ot 25 iyunya 2002 g. ¹ 73-FZ (v red. ot 23 iyulya 2013 g. ¹ 245-FZ) // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federatsii. – 2002. – ¹ 26. – St. 2519; 2013. – ¹ 30 (chast' 1). – St. 4078.
Ob utverzhdenii Polozheniya o poryadke attestatsii ekspertov po provedeniyu gosudarstvennoy istoriko-kul'turnoy ekspertizy : prikaz Ministerstva kul'tury RF ot 26 avgusta 2010 goda ¹ 563 (v red. ot 17 oktyabrya 2011 g. ¹ 1003) // Rossiyskaya gazeta. – 2010. – ¹ 246; Byulleten' normativnykh aktov federal'nykh organov ispolnitel'noy vlasti. – 2011.-¹ 49.
Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Krasnodarskogo kraya ot 8 iyulya 2009 goda po delu ¹ A32-7328/2009-63/171 // Razmeshcheno na ofitsial'nom sayte Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo suda RF. URL.: www.kad.arbitr.ru.
Reshenie Severskogo rayonnogo suda Krasnodarskogo kraya ot 15 iyulya 2014 goda po delu ¹ 2-1156/14 // Razmeshcheno na ofitsial'nom sayte Krasnodarskogo kraevogo suda. URL.: www.kubansud.ru.
Opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 4 dekabrya 2013 goda po delu ¹ 69-APG13-5 // Razmeshcheno na ofitsial'nom sayte Verkhovnogo Suda RF. URL.: www.vsrf.ru.
Reshenie Oktyabr'skogo rayonnogo suda g.Krasnodara ot 19 sentyabrya 2013 goda po zayavleniyu prokurora Zapadnogo okruga g.Krasnodara k GAU KK «Krasnodarkraygosekspertiza»; reshenie Pervomayskogo rayonnogo suda g.Krasnodara ot 15 iyulya 2013 goda po zayavleniyu prokurora Zapadnogo okruga g.Krasnodara k departamentu arkhitektury i gradostroitel'stva m.o. g.Krasnodar // Razmeshcheny na ofitsial'nom sayte Krasnodarskogo kraevogo suda. URL.: www.kubansud.ru.
Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Krasnodarskogo kraya ot 25 sentyabrya 2008 goda po delu ¹ A32-6680/2008-39/132; Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Krasnodarskogo kraya ot 17 noyabrya 2009 goda ¹ A32-21579/2008-5/295; Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Krasnodarskogo kraya ot 17 marta 2010 goda po delu ¹ A32-55816/2009-63/1023 i pr. // Razmeshcheno na ofitsial'nom sayte Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo suda RF. URL.: www.kad.arbitr.ru.
Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Krasnodarskogo kraya ot 31 yanvarya 2007 goda po delu ¹ A32-8172/2006-50/1 // Razmeshcheno na ofitsial'nom sayte Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo suda RF. URL.: www.kad.arbitr.ru.
Postanovlenie Pyatnadtsatogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 15 iyulya 2013 goda po delu ¹ A32-18248/2012 // Razmeshcheno na ofitsial'nom sayte Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo suda RF. URL.: www.kad.arbitr.ru.
Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Krasnodarskogo kraya ot 22 dekabrya 2012 goda po delu ¹ A32-21193/2012 // Razmeshcheno na ofitsial'nom sayte Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo suda RF. URL.: www.kad.arbitr.ru.
Reshenie Oktyabr'skogo rayonnogo suda g.Krasnodara ot 24 iyunya 2014 goda po isku gr-ki Petrenko G.V. k gr-nu Trofimovskomu A.I., IP Shamsha E.P., IP Elizarovoy I.Yu. o demontazhe vyveski // Razmeshcheno na ofitsial'nom sayte Krasnodarskogo kraevogo suda. URL.: www.kubansud.ru.
Ob utverzhdenii Polozheniya o gosudarstvennoy istoriko-kul'turnoy ekspertize : Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 15 iyulya 2009 goda ¹ 569 ( v red. ot 4 sentyabrya 2012 g. ¹ 880) // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federatsii. – 2009. – ¹ 30. – St. 3812; 2012. – ¹ 37. – St. 5000.
Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Krasnodarskogo kraya ot 15 avgusta 2012 goda po delu ¹ A32-17829/2011 // Razmeshcheno na ofitsial'nom sayte Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo suda RF. URL.: www.kad.arbitr.ru.
Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Krasnodarskogo kraya ot 18 maya 2011 goda po delu ¹ A32-25849/2010 // Razmeshcheno na ofitsial'nom sayte Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo suda RF. URL.: www.kad.arbitr.ru.
Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Krasnodarskogo kraya ot 2 fevralya 2011 goda po delu ¹ A32-31326/2010-36/753 // Razmeshcheno na ofitsial'nom sayte Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo suda RF. URL.: www.kad.arbitr.ru.
Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Krasnodarskogo kraya ot 19 sentyabrya 2011 goda po delu ¹ A32-37144/10 // Razmeshcheno na ofitsial'nom sayte Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo suda RF. URL.: www.kad.arbitr.ru.
Ob organizatsii predostavleniya gosudarstvennykh i munitsipal'nykh uslug : Federal'nyy zakon ot 27 iyulya 2010 goda ¹ 210-FZ (v red. ot 21.07.2014 g. ¹ 263-FZ) // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federatsii. – 2010. – ¹ 31. – St. 4179; 2014. – ¹ 30 (Chast' 1). – St. 4264.
Ob utverzhdenii administrativnykh reglamentov upravleniya gosudarstvennoy okhrany ob'ektov kul'turnogo naslediya Krasnodarskogo kraya «Soglasovanie razmeshcheniya i (ili) ustanovki, a takzhe ekspluatatsii reklamnykh konstruktsiy, afish, vyvesok, televizionnykh antenn, elektricheskikh i telefonnykh kabeley, ventilyatsionnykh sistem i inogo oborudovaniya v otnoshenii ob'ektov kul'turnogo naslediya» : prikaz upravleniya po okhrane, restavratsii i ekspluatatsii istoriko-kul'turnykh tsennostey (naslediya) Krasnodarskogo kraya ot 24.05.2012 g. ¹ 50 // Razmeshchen na ofitsial'nom sayte organa. URL.: uorn.krasnodar.ru.

References (transliteration):
Ob ob'ektakh kul'turnogo naslediya (pamyatnikakh istorii i kul'tury) narodov Rossiyskoy Federatsii : Federal'nyy zakon ot 25 iyunya 2002 g. ¹ 73-FZ (v red. ot 23 iyulya 2013 g. ¹ 245-FZ) // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federatsii. – 2002. – ¹ 26. – St. 2519; 2013. – ¹ 30 (chast' 1). – St. 4078.
Ob utverzhdenii Polozheniya o poryadke attestatsii ekspertov po provedeniyu gosudarstvennoy istoriko-kul'turnoy ekspertizy : prikaz Ministerstva kul'tury RF ot 26 avgusta 2010 goda ¹ 563 (v red. ot 17 oktyabrya 2011 g. ¹ 1003) // Rossiyskaya gazeta. – 2010. – ¹ 246; Byulleten' normativnykh aktov federal'nykh organov ispolnitel'noy vlasti. – 2011.-¹ 49.
Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Krasnodarskogo kraya ot 8 iyulya 2009 goda po delu ¹ A32-7328/2009-63/171 // Razmeshcheno na ofitsial'nom sayte Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo suda RF. URL.: www.kad.arbitr.ru.
Reshenie Severskogo rayonnogo suda Krasnodarskogo kraya ot 15 iyulya 2014 goda po delu ¹ 2-1156/14 // Razmeshcheno na ofitsial'nom sayte Krasnodarskogo kraevogo suda. URL.: www.kubansud.ru.
Opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 4 dekabrya 2013 goda po delu ¹ 69-APG13-5 // Razmeshcheno na ofitsial'nom sayte Verkhovnogo Suda RF. URL.: www.vsrf.ru.
Reshenie Oktyabr'skogo rayonnogo suda g.Krasnodara ot 19 sentyabrya 2013 goda po zayavleniyu prokurora Zapadnogo okruga g.Krasnodara k GAU KK «Krasnodarkraygosekspertiza»; reshenie Pervomayskogo rayonnogo suda g.Krasnodara ot 15 iyulya 2013 goda po zayavleniyu prokurora Zapadnogo okruga g.Krasnodara k departamentu arkhitektury i gradostroitel'stva m.o. g.Krasnodar // Razmeshcheny na ofitsial'nom sayte Krasnodarskogo kraevogo suda. URL.: www.kubansud.ru.
Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Krasnodarskogo kraya ot 25 sentyabrya 2008 goda po delu ¹ A32-6680/2008-39/132; Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Krasnodarskogo kraya ot 17 noyabrya 2009 goda ¹ A32-21579/2008-5/295; Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Krasnodarskogo kraya ot 17 marta 2010 goda po delu ¹ A32-55816/2009-63/1023 i pr. // Razmeshcheno na ofitsial'nom sayte Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo suda RF. URL.: www.kad.arbitr.ru.
Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Krasnodarskogo kraya ot 31 yanvarya 2007 goda po delu ¹ A32-8172/2006-50/1 // Razmeshcheno na ofitsial'nom sayte Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo suda RF. URL.: www.kad.arbitr.ru.
Postanovlenie Pyatnadtsatogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 15 iyulya 2013 goda po delu ¹ A32-18248/2012 // Razmeshcheno na ofitsial'nom sayte Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo suda RF. URL.: www.kad.arbitr.ru.
Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Krasnodarskogo kraya ot 22 dekabrya 2012 goda po delu ¹ A32-21193/2012 // Razmeshcheno na ofitsial'nom sayte Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo suda RF. URL.: www.kad.arbitr.ru.
Reshenie Oktyabr'skogo rayonnogo suda g.Krasnodara ot 24 iyunya 2014 goda po isku gr-ki Petrenko G.V. k gr-nu Trofimovskomu A.I., IP Shamsha E.P., IP Elizarovoy I.Yu. o demontazhe vyveski // Razmeshcheno na ofitsial'nom sayte Krasnodarskogo kraevogo suda. URL.: www.kubansud.ru.
Ob utverzhdenii Polozheniya o gosudarstvennoy istoriko-kul'turnoy ekspertize : Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 15 iyulya 2009 goda ¹ 569 ( v red. ot 4 sentyabrya 2012 g. ¹ 880) // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federatsii. – 2009. – ¹ 30. – St. 3812; 2012. – ¹ 37. – St. 5000.
Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Krasnodarskogo kraya ot 15 avgusta 2012 goda po delu ¹ A32-17829/2011 // Razmeshcheno na ofitsial'nom sayte Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo suda RF. URL.: www.kad.arbitr.ru.
Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Krasnodarskogo kraya ot 18 maya 2011 goda po delu ¹ A32-25849/2010 // Razmeshcheno na ofitsial'nom sayte Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo suda RF. URL.: www.kad.arbitr.ru.
Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Krasnodarskogo kraya ot 2 fevralya 2011 goda po delu ¹ A32-31326/2010-36/753 // Razmeshcheno na ofitsial'nom sayte Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo suda RF. URL.: www.kad.arbitr.ru.
Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Krasnodarskogo kraya ot 19 sentyabrya 2011 goda po delu ¹ A32-37144/10 // Razmeshcheno na ofitsial'nom sayte Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo suda RF. URL.: www.kad.arbitr.ru.
Ob organizatsii predostavleniya gosudarstvennykh i munitsipal'nykh uslug : Federal'nyy zakon ot 27 iyulya 2010 goda ¹ 210-FZ (v red. ot 21.07.2014 g. ¹ 263-FZ) // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federatsii. – 2010. – ¹ 31. – St. 4179; 2014. – ¹ 30 (Chast' 1). – St. 4264.
Ob utverzhdenii administrativnykh reglamentov upravleniya gosudarstvennoy okhrany ob'ektov kul'turnogo naslediya Krasnodarskogo kraya «Soglasovanie razmeshcheniya i (ili) ustanovki, a takzhe ekspluatatsii reklamnykh konstruktsiy, afish, vyvesok, televizionnykh antenn, elektricheskikh i telefonnykh kabeley, ventilyatsionnykh sistem i inogo oborudovaniya v otnoshenii ob'ektov kul'turnogo naslediya» : prikaz upravleniya po okhrane, restavratsii i ekspluatatsii istoriko-kul'turnykh tsennostey (naslediya) Krasnodarskogo kraya ot 24.05.2012 g. ¹ 50 // Razmeshchen na ofitsial'nom sayte organa. URL.: uorn.krasnodar.ru.

Abstract: In order to improve the mechanism of implementing the administrative-law rules, it is necessary to provide administrative support for the relevant aspect o work of Russian police. In this regard, the author believes that it is necessary to adopt a certain regulation defining the following: the scope of public services provided by the Russian Ministry for Internal Affairs to physical and legal entities; the list of administrative proceedings performed in within the competence of internal affairs bodies (police). This approach could contribute to understanding and disclosing the essence of the administrative-law work carried out by the police. In this research, the author used theoretical, general philosophical methods, conventional legal methods and the methods used in specific sociological research. The article notes that it is currently important to approve the forms of process documents made by the policemen during their administrative-law work. The solution would rule out the free-form approach to preparing a whole number of process documents in administrative cases, in cases on complaints and in various administrative procedures.

Keywords: process, procedures, proceedings, stage, participant, police, jurisdiction, protocol, act, influence.

References:
Kurakin A.V. Administrativno-yurisdiktsionnaya deyatel'nost' politsii: problemy teorii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo.-2014.-3.-C. 259-271. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.3.11115.
Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V. Administrativnyy protsess i ego realizatsii v deyatel'nosti politsii // NB: Rossiyskoe politseyskoe pravo.-2013.-4.-C. 1-44. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4218.2013.4.9250. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_9250.html
Shergin A.P. Administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya. M., 1979.
Yakimov A.Yu. Administrativno-yurisdiktsionnyy protsess i administrativno-yurisdiktsionnoe proizvodstvo // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 1999. ¹ 3.
Sorokin V.D. Administrativno-protsessual'noe pravo. SPb., 2004.
Serebryakova I.M. Administrativno-yurisdiktsionnaya deyatel'nost' militsii Respubliki Belarus': avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Minsk, 1998.
Panova I.V. Administrativnoe proizvodstvo nuzhdaetsya v skoreyshey yuridizatsii // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2000. ¹ 2.
Sergun P.P. Okhrana prav i svobod lichnosti v proizvodstve po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Saratov, 1987.
Naymalovskiy A.S. Uproshchennoe proizvodstvo po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh, osushchestvlyaemoe organami vnutrennikh del (militsii): dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 1994.
Maslennikov M.Ya. Proizvodstvo po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh. M., 1994.
Mikhaylenko A.P. Organizatsiya i osushchestvlenie proizvodstva po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v organakh vnutrennikh del: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2000.
Klyushnichenko A.P. Organizatsiya administrativno-yurisdiktsionnoy deyatel'nosti organov vnutrennikh del v svete osnov zakonodatel'stva Soyuza SSR i soyuznykh respublik ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh. Kiev, 1983.
Korenev A.P. Normy administrativnogo prava i ikh primenenie. M., 1978.
Dyad'kin O.N. Pravovoy status litsa, privlekaemogo k administrativnoy otvetstvennosti (po materialam administrativnoy praktiki organov vnutrennikh del): dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2001.
Galagan I.A. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' v SSSR (protsessual'noe regulirovanie). Voronezh, 1976.
Vasil'ev A.S., Orzikh M.F. K voprosu o sootnoshenii i otraslevoy prinadlezhnosti administrativnogo protsessa i proizvodstva po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Proizvodstvo po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v organakh vnutrennikh del. Kiev, 1983.
Bakhrakh D.N. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' grazhdan v SSSR. Sverdlovsk, 1989.
Bakhrakh D.N., Renov E.N. Proizvodstvo po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh. M., 1989.
Bakhrakh D.N. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost'. M., 1999.
Kurakin A.V. Kompetentsiya politsii v sfere realizatsii zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya.-2013.-4.-C. 28-48. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.4.8841. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8841.html
Kupreev S.S. Soderzhanie, formy i metody administrativnoy deyatel'nosti politsii // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2014. - 2. - C. 191 - 202. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2014.2.11765.
Mikhel'kevich A.V. Administrativno-protsessual'nyy kodeks —
byt' ili ne byt'? // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2013. - 1. - C. 33 - 35. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.01.7.
Agafonov S.I., Korobkin M.V. Administrativnye reglamenty
i protsedury v sisteme MVD Rossii. // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2011. - 1. - C. 26 - 35.

References (transliteration):
Kurakin A.V. Administrativno-yurisdiktsionnaya deyatel'nost' politsii: problemy teorii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo.-2014.-3.-C. 259-271. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.3.11115.
Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V. Administrativnyy protsess i ego realizatsii v deyatel'nosti politsii // NB: Rossiyskoe politseyskoe pravo.-2013.-4.-C. 1-44. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4218.2013.4.9250. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_9250.html
Shergin A.P. Administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya. M., 1979.
Yakimov A.Yu. Administrativno-yurisdiktsionnyy protsess i administrativno-yurisdiktsionnoe proizvodstvo // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 1999. ¹ 3.
Sorokin V.D. Administrativno-protsessual'noe pravo. SPb., 2004.
Serebryakova I.M. Administrativno-yurisdiktsionnaya deyatel'nost' militsii Respubliki Belarus': avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Minsk, 1998.
Panova I.V. Administrativnoe proizvodstvo nuzhdaetsya v skoreyshey yuridizatsii // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2000. ¹ 2.
Sergun P.P. Okhrana prav i svobod lichnosti v proizvodstve po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Saratov, 1987.
Naymalovskiy A.S. Uproshchennoe proizvodstvo po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh, osushchestvlyaemoe organami vnutrennikh del (militsii): dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 1994.
Maslennikov M.Ya. Proizvodstvo po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh. M., 1994.
Mikhaylenko A.P. Organizatsiya i osushchestvlenie proizvodstva po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v organakh vnutrennikh del: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2000.
Klyushnichenko A.P. Organizatsiya administrativno-yurisdiktsionnoy deyatel'nosti organov vnutrennikh del v svete osnov zakonodatel'stva Soyuza SSR i soyuznykh respublik ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh. Kiev, 1983.
Korenev A.P. Normy administrativnogo prava i ikh primenenie. M., 1978.
Dyad'kin O.N. Pravovoy status litsa, privlekaemogo k administrativnoy otvetstvennosti (po materialam administrativnoy praktiki organov vnutrennikh del): dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2001.
Galagan I.A. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' v SSSR (protsessual'noe regulirovanie). Voronezh, 1976.
Vasil'ev A.S., Orzikh M.F. K voprosu o sootnoshenii i otraslevoy prinadlezhnosti administrativnogo protsessa i proizvodstva po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Proizvodstvo po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v organakh vnutrennikh del. Kiev, 1983.
Bakhrakh D.N. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' grazhdan v SSSR. Sverdlovsk, 1989.
Bakhrakh D.N., Renov E.N. Proizvodstvo po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh. M., 1989.
Bakhrakh D.N. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost'. M., 1999.
Kurakin A.V. Kompetentsiya politsii v sfere realizatsii zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya.-2013.-4.-C. 28-48. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.4.8841. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8841.html
Kupreev S.S. Soderzhanie, formy i metody administrativnoy deyatel'nosti politsii // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2014. - 2. - C. 191 - 202. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2014.2.11765.
Mikhel'kevich A.V. Administrativno-protsessual'nyy kodeks —
byt' ili ne byt'? // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2013. - 1. - C. 33 - 35. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.01.7.
Agafonov S.I., Korobkin M.V. Administrativnye reglamenty
i protsedury v sisteme MVD Rossii. // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2011. - 1. - C. 26 - 35.

Abstract: This article is devoted to the analysis of today’s condition of the social relations within the proceedings in administrative cases referred to the competence of customs authorities in the situation of functioning of the Customs Union, administrative laws of the members of the Customs Union, identification of the specific features typical of the national law of certain countries, and any inconsistencies obstructing the effective administration of the proceedings in administrative cases affected by the functioning of the Customs Union, generation of proposals related to improvement of the laws of member of the Customs Union related to the proceedings in administrative cases. In order to generate proposals related to improvement of the laws of member of the Customs Union related to the proceedings in administrative cases, the scientific and comparative research methods were used. The analysis which was performed generally showed the existence in the three countries of the common principles and approaches employed by the customs authorities when holding persons administratively responsible. At the same time, a number of specific features was identified which are typical of national laws of certain countries and inconsistencies obstructing the effective performance of the proceedings in administrative cases affected by the functioning of the Customs Union. Conclusions: for the purposes of effective performance of the proceedings in administrative cases affected by the functioning of the Customs Union, it is necessary to harmonize the rules of laws related to the administrative responsibility in the countries which are members of the Customs Union, i.e. unify them, as relates to: 1. Include in the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation and the Administrative Offences Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan the institute of complicity when the organizer and accessory of the offence are also held administratively liable as is expressly provided in the Administrative Offences Code of the Republic of Belarus. 2. Include in the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation and the Administrative Offences Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan the institute of attempted administrative offence as is expressly provided in the Administrative Offences Code of the Republic of Belarus. 3. Establish the uniform limitations period for administrative responsibility for violation of customs rule in the Administrative Offences Codes of the countries which are members of the Customs Union. 4. Include the institute of suspension of the limitations period for administrative responsibility as is expressly provided in the Administrative Offences Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan. 5. Include the institute of consolidation in the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation as is expressly provided in the Administrative Offences Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the Administrative Offences Code of the Republic of Belarus.

Keywords: administrative offence, national laws, customs authorities, Russian Federation, Republic of Kazakhstan, Republic of Belarus, Customs Union, differentiation of punishment, sequester, complicity.

References:
Dogovor ob osobennostyakh ugolovnoy i administrativnoy otvetstvennosti za narusheniya tamozhennogo zakonodatel'stva Tamozhennogo soyuza i gosudarstv – chlenov Tamozhennogo soyuza. Reshenie Mezhgossoveta EvrAzES ot 05.07.2010 ¹ 50. 8. Strigunova N.Yu. Dokazyvanie po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v oblasti tamozhennogo dela v gosudarstvakh-chlenakh Tamozhennogo soyuza EvrAzES (sravnitel'no-pravovoy analiz) // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo.-2013.-10.-C. 980-985. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.10.9765. 9. Moshkina N.A. Realizatsiya interesov gosudarstv v usloviyakh integratsii (na primere tamozhennogo soyuza Rossii, Belorussii i Kazakhstana) // NB: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2012.-1.-C. 80-91. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_32.html
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh. (v red. ot 15.02.2014 ¹ 6-FZ) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF.2002, ¹ 1 (ch. 1). St. 1.
Tamozhennyy kodeks Tamozhennogo soyuza (prilozhenie k Dogovoru o Tamozhennom kodekse Tamozhennogo soyuza, prinyatomu Resheniem Mezhgosudarstvennogo soveta EvrAzES na urovne glav gosudarstv ot 27.11.2009 ¹ 17) (v red. ot 16.04.2010) // Cobranie zakonodatel'stva RF.2010. ¹ 50. St. 6615.
Protsessual'no-ispolnitel'nyy kodeks Respubliki Belarus': Zakon Respubliki Belarus' ot 20.12.2006 ¹ 194-Z [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://tamby.info/kodeks/pikoap.htm /data obrashcheniya: 24.02.2014).
Kodeks ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh Respubliki Belarus': Zakon Respubliki Belarus' ot 21.04.2003 ¹ 194-Z [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://tamby.info/kodeks/pikoap.htm / (data obrashcheniya: 24.02.2014).
Kodeks ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh Respubliki Kazakhstan: Zakon Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 30.01.2001 ¹ 156-II [Elektronnyy resurs].URL: http://www.zakon.kz/static/administrativnyykodex.html / (data obrashcheniya: 24.02.2014).

References (transliteration):
Dogovor ob osobennostyakh ugolovnoy i administrativnoy otvetstvennosti za narusheniya tamozhennogo zakonodatel'stva Tamozhennogo soyuza i gosudarstv – chlenov Tamozhennogo soyuza. Reshenie Mezhgossoveta EvrAzES ot 05.07.2010 ¹ 50. 8. Strigunova N.Yu. Dokazyvanie po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v oblasti tamozhennogo dela v gosudarstvakh-chlenakh Tamozhennogo soyuza EvrAzES (sravnitel'no-pravovoy analiz) // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo.-2013.-10.-C. 980-985. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.10.9765. 9. Moshkina N.A. Realizatsiya interesov gosudarstv v usloviyakh integratsii (na primere tamozhennogo soyuza Rossii, Belorussii i Kazakhstana) // NB: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2012.-1.-C. 80-91. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_32.html
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh. (v red. ot 15.02.2014 ¹ 6-FZ) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF.2002, ¹ 1 (ch. 1). St. 1.
Tamozhennyy kodeks Tamozhennogo soyuza (prilozhenie k Dogovoru o Tamozhennom kodekse Tamozhennogo soyuza, prinyatomu Resheniem Mezhgosudarstvennogo soveta EvrAzES na urovne glav gosudarstv ot 27.11.2009 ¹ 17) (v red. ot 16.04.2010) // Cobranie zakonodatel'stva RF.2010. ¹ 50. St. 6615.
Protsessual'no-ispolnitel'nyy kodeks Respubliki Belarus': Zakon Respubliki Belarus' ot 20.12.2006 ¹ 194-Z [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://tamby.info/kodeks/pikoap.htm /data obrashcheniya: 24.02.2014).
Kodeks ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh Respubliki Belarus': Zakon Respubliki Belarus' ot 21.04.2003 ¹ 194-Z [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://tamby.info/kodeks/pikoap.htm / (data obrashcheniya: 24.02.2014).
Kodeks ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh Respubliki Kazakhstan: Zakon Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 30.01.2001 ¹ 156-II [Elektronnyy resurs].URL: http://www.zakon.kz/static/administrativnyykodex.html / (data obrashcheniya: 24.02.2014).

Abstract: The relevant type of legal process has its specific features, and they are characterized by their peculiarities. In particular, the administrative process influences a wide range of social relations, which are formed in the sphere of public administration. Implementation of positive legal norms in various branches of law is implemented via various administrative legal norms. Additionally, administrative process provides the possibility for the implementation of the administrative coercion measures. From this standpoint the author views contents and specific features of administrative jurisdiction activities of the police, which have formed an object of his scientific study. The methodological basis for the dissertation was formed with the modern achievements of the theory of cognition. In the process of study the author involved general philosophical, theoretical methods (dialectic, systemic methods, analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, induction, observation, modeling), traditional legal methods (formal logical), as well as methods used in the specific social studies (statistical, expert evaluation, etc.). According to the current legislation of the Russian Federation the police implements a wide range of administrative proceedings, procedures and regulations, which facilitate guarantees of legal order, protection of rights and lawful interests of natural persons and legal entities interacting with the police officials. With the help of administrative procedures and regulation the citizens and economic subjects are provided with various public services involving protection of property, issuing various documents, etc.

Keywords: police, policeman, process, jurisdiction, stage, proceedings, officer, coercion, responsibility, influence.

References:
Aleksandrov N.G. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava. M., 1968.
Alekseev S.S. Gosudarstvo i pravo. Nachal'nyy kurs. M., 1994.
Administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya. M., 1994.
Budyleva M.V. Administrativno-pravovaya organizatsiya otvetstvennosti za sovershenie nalogovykh pravonarusheniy: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Khabarovsk, 2004.
Vinogradov A.F. Administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya organov vnutrennikh del: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 1996.
Grechkina O.V. Administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya tamozhennykh organov Rossiyskoy Federatsii: teoretiko-prikladnoe issledovanie: avtoref. dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 2011.
Komlev S.V. Administrativno-yurisdiktsionnyy protsess: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2008.
Staynov P. Osobennosti yurisdiktsii v oblasti administrativnogo prava. Sofiya, 1956.
Serebryakova I.M. Administrativno-yurisdiktsionnaya deyatel'nost' militsii Respubliki Belarus': avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Minsk, 1998.
Ponikarov V.A. Osnovy administrativno-yurisdiktsionnoy deyatel'nosti v ugolovno-ispolnitel'noy sisteme. M., 2007.
Pereterskiy I.S. Vseobshchaya istoriya gosudarstva i prava. M., 1945.
Shergin A.P. Administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya. – M., 1979.
Chekalina O.V. Administrativno-yurisdiktsionnyy protsess: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2005.
Sorokin V.D. Administrativno-protsessual'noe pravo. – L., 1972.
Yuridicheskaya entsiklopediya. M., 1998.
Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V. Administrativnyy protsess i ego realizatsii v deyatel'nosti politsii // NB: Rossiyskoe politseyskoe pravo. - 2013. - 4. - C. 1 - 44. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4218.2013.4.9250. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_9250.html
Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V., Obydenov V.V. K voprosu o sootnoshenii ponyatiy «administrativnyy protsess» i «administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya» v deyatel'nosti politsii // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2014. - 2. - C. 179 - 190. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2014.2.11172.
Kurakin A.V. Administrativno-yurisdiktsionnaya deyatel'nost' politsii: problemy teorii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2014. - 3. - C. 259 - 271. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.3.11115.
Kurakin A.V. Kompetentsiya politsii v sfere realizatsii zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 28 - 48. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.4.8841. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8841.html
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. Administrativnyy protsess
i ego realizatsiya
v deyatel'nosti politsii // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2013. - 3. - C. 155 - 170. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.3.8995.

References (transliteration):
Aleksandrov N.G. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava. M., 1968.
Alekseev S.S. Gosudarstvo i pravo. Nachal'nyy kurs. M., 1994.
Administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya. M., 1994.
Budyleva M.V. Administrativno-pravovaya organizatsiya otvetstvennosti za sovershenie nalogovykh pravonarusheniy: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Khabarovsk, 2004.
Vinogradov A.F. Administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya organov vnutrennikh del: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 1996.
Grechkina O.V. Administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya tamozhennykh organov Rossiyskoy Federatsii: teoretiko-prikladnoe issledovanie: avtoref. dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 2011.
Komlev S.V. Administrativno-yurisdiktsionnyy protsess: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2008.
Staynov P. Osobennosti yurisdiktsii v oblasti administrativnogo prava. Sofiya, 1956.
Serebryakova I.M. Administrativno-yurisdiktsionnaya deyatel'nost' militsii Respubliki Belarus': avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Minsk, 1998.
Ponikarov V.A. Osnovy administrativno-yurisdiktsionnoy deyatel'nosti v ugolovno-ispolnitel'noy sisteme. M., 2007.
Pereterskiy I.S. Vseobshchaya istoriya gosudarstva i prava. M., 1945.
Shergin A.P. Administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya. – M., 1979.
Chekalina O.V. Administrativno-yurisdiktsionnyy protsess: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2005.
Sorokin V.D. Administrativno-protsessual'noe pravo. – L., 1972.
Yuridicheskaya entsiklopediya. M., 1998.
Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V. Administrativnyy protsess i ego realizatsii v deyatel'nosti politsii // NB: Rossiyskoe politseyskoe pravo. - 2013. - 4. - C. 1 - 44. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4218.2013.4.9250. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_9250.html
Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V., Obydenov V.V. K voprosu o sootnoshenii ponyatiy «administrativnyy protsess» i «administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya» v deyatel'nosti politsii // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2014. - 2. - C. 179 - 190. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2014.2.11172.
Kurakin A.V. Administrativno-yurisdiktsionnaya deyatel'nost' politsii: problemy teorii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2014. - 3. - C. 259 - 271. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.3.11115.
Kurakin A.V. Kompetentsiya politsii v sfere realizatsii zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 28 - 48. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.4.8841. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8841.html
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. Administrativnyy protsess
i ego realizatsiya
v deyatel'nosti politsii // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2013. - 3. - C. 155 - 170. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.3.8995.

Abstract: In this article based upon the scientific analysis of the problems of administrative jurisdiction the author provides recommendations for the improvement of administrative jurisdiction legislation, defining specific features of administrative jurisdiction activities in the spheres of finances, taxes, levies, insurance, securities market, federal executive bodies, Central Bank of the Russian Federation. Administrative jurisdiction is a type of law-enforcement administrative procedural activity of the competent public body usually, a state executive body) on dealing with and resolving administrative jurisdiction cases, disputes, implementation of sanctions and protection of protective legal relations with the application of means of public coercion (administrative, disciplinary, etc.) which is regulated by law. The methodological basis for the scientific article was formed by the current achievements of the theory of cognition. In the process of studies the author used general philosophical, theoretical and empiric methods (dialectics, systemic method, analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, observation, modeling), traditional legal methods ( formal logic method), and methods typical for specific sociological studies (statistical, expert evaluation, etc.). Administrative jurisdiction includes administrative proceedings: proceedings on cases on administrative offences; proceedings on claims of citizens regarding acts or activities (inactions) of public government bodies and officials; disciplinary proceedings, enforcement proceedings. Additionally, administrative jurisdiction involves specific disciplinary activities in various spheres and areas of public administration. Specifically, in the spheres of finances, taxes, levies, insurance, securities market there are proceedings on tax, budget offences, proceedings on offences on legislation of the Russian Federation on the insurance fees, proceedings regarding violations of the Federal Law “On the Central Bank of the Russian Federation (Bank of Russia)”.

Keywords: jurisdiction, tax, levy, fee, police, Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation, offence, elements of an offence, administration, finances.

Contact information: Lapina, Marina Afanasievna, 123456, Russia, Moskva, Leningradskiy prospect, 49.

References:
Shergin A.P. Tendentsii sovremennoy administrativnoy politiki. Aktual'nye problemy administrativnogo i administrativno-protsessual'nogo prava: materialy ezhegodnoy vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, posvyashchennoy pamyati V.D. Sorokina, 21 marta 2014 goda. V 3-kh chastyakh. SPb: Izd-vo SPb un-ta MVD Rossii, 2014. Ch. 2. S.3-11.
Shergin A. P. Problemy administrativno-deliktnogo prava. Gosudarstvo i pravo. 1994, ¹ 8-9. S. 53-63.
Kostennikov M.V., Korzun S.Yu., Tregubova E.V. Administrativnye zaprety i mekhanizmy zashchity prav nalogoplatel'shchikov ― fizicheskikh lits (chast' 2) // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo.-2010.-3.-C. 5-33.
Balaeva D.A., Morgoeva A.Kh. Nalogovoe administrirovanie: vzglyad v budushchee // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. - 2014. - 2. - C. 174 - 183. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8688.2014.2.11361.
Kostennikov M.V., Korzun S.Yu., Tregubova E.V. Administrativnye zaprety i mekhanizmy zashchity prav nalogoplatel'shchikov — fizicheskikh lits (chast' 1) // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo.-2010.-2.-C. 10-35.
Kurakin A.V. Kompetentsiya politsii v sfere realizatsii zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya.-2013.-4.-C. 28-48. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.4.8841. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8841.html
Tikhomirov Yu.A., Shakhray S.M. Risk i pravo: Nauchnoe izdanie.-M.: Izdatel'stvo Moskovskogo universiteta, 2012.-64 s.;
Starostin S.A. O protsessual'no-pravovom aspekte administrativnoy otvetstvennosti. Aktual'nye problemy administrativnogo i administrativno-protsessual'nogo prava: materialy ezhegodnoy vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, posvyashchennoy pamyati V.D. Sorokina, 21 marta 2014 goda. V 3-kh chastyakh. SPb: Izd-vo SPb un-ta MVD Rossii, 2014. Ch. 1. S. 183.
Tikhomirov Yu.A. Gosudarstvo: preemstvennost' i novizna: Nauchnoe izdanie.-M.: ID «Yurisprudentsiya», 2011. – 80 s.
Tikhomirov Yu.A. Prognozy i riski v pravovoy sfere // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2014. N 3. S. 5-16.
Rossinskiy B.V. O razgranichenii kompetentsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii i ee sub'ektov v oblasti ukrepleniya administrativnoy otvetstvennosti. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, ¹7, 2001 g. S. 15-23.
Solovey Yu.P. Retsenziya na monografiyu P.P. Serkova "Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' v rossiyskom prave: sovremennoe osmyslenie i novye podkhody" // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2013. N 3. S. 72-80.
Starostin B.A. Nekotorye problemy ustanovleniya i realizatsii administrativnoy otvetstvennosti zakonami sub'ektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2013. N 8. S. 27-29.
Pravovye riski v sisteme publichnogo upravleniya. Kollektivnaya monografiya /Pod nauch. red. V.I. Avdiyskogo, M.A. Lapinoy. M.: Finansovyy universitet pri Pravitel'stve Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 2014.-248 s.
Myshlyaev N.P. Administrativnaya deliktologiya: Voprosy teorii i praktiki. Monografiya. M.: VNII MVD Rossii, 2002.-128 s.
Kontseptsii razvitiya rossiyskogo zakonodatel'stva. Otv.red. T.Ya. Khabrieva, Yu.A. Tikhomirov.-M.: IZiSP, ID «Yurisprudentsiya». 2013. – 104 s.
Lapina M.A. Lektsii 22-24 v: Administrativnoe pravo Rossii: Kurs lektsiy / Pod red. d.yu.n. I.Sh. Kilyaskhanova.-M.: Izd-vo BF MosU MVD Rossii, 2003.
Lapina M.A. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' yuridicheskikh lits: voprosy zakonodatel'nogo regulirovaniya. Aktual'nye problemy administrativnogo i administrativno-protsessual'nogo prava: Materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. M.: MosU MVD Rossii, 2003, S. 385-391;
Bereziy A.E. Dosudebnyy poryadok uregulirovaniya sporov i primiritel'nye protsedury po delam, voznikayushchim iz administrativnykh i inykh publichnykh pravootnosheniy-sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy. Aktual'nye problemy administrativnogo i administrativno-protsessual'nogo prava: materialy ezhegodnoy vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, posvyashchennoy pamyati V.D. Sorokina, 21 marta 2014 goda. V 3-kh chastyakh. SPb: Izd-vo SPb un-ta MVD Rossii, 2014. Ch.
Lapina M.A. Administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya v sisteme administrativnogo protsessa: monografiya. M.: Finansovyy universitet, 2013. 140 s.
Lapina M.A. O razvitii administrativno-yurisdiktsionnogo zakonodatel'stva v finansovoy sfere. Aktual'nye problemy administrativnogo i administrativno-protsessual'nogo prava: materialy ezhegodnoy vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, posvyashchennoy pamyati V.D. Sorokina, 21 marta 2014 goda. V 3-kh chastyakh. SPb: Izd-vo SPb un-ta MVD Rossii, 2014. Ch. 2. S. 11-17.
S. 17-20. 2.Dugenets A.S., Myshlyaev D.N., Shergin A.P. i dr. Osnovnye instituty administrativno-deliktnogo prava / Pod obshchey red. A.P. Shergina. M.: VNII MVD Rossii, 1999.

References (transliteration):
Shergin A.P. Tendentsii sovremennoy administrativnoy politiki. Aktual'nye problemy administrativnogo i administrativno-protsessual'nogo prava: materialy ezhegodnoy vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, posvyashchennoy pamyati V.D. Sorokina, 21 marta 2014 goda. V 3-kh chastyakh. SPb: Izd-vo SPb un-ta MVD Rossii, 2014. Ch. 2. S.3-11.
Shergin A. P. Problemy administrativno-deliktnogo prava. Gosudarstvo i pravo. 1994, ¹ 8-9. S. 53-63.
Kostennikov M.V., Korzun S.Yu., Tregubova E.V. Administrativnye zaprety i mekhanizmy zashchity prav nalogoplatel'shchikov ― fizicheskikh lits (chast' 2) // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo.-2010.-3.-C. 5-33.
Balaeva D.A., Morgoeva A.Kh. Nalogovoe administrirovanie: vzglyad v budushchee // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. - 2014. - 2. - C. 174 - 183. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8688.2014.2.11361.
Kostennikov M.V., Korzun S.Yu., Tregubova E.V. Administrativnye zaprety i mekhanizmy zashchity prav nalogoplatel'shchikov — fizicheskikh lits (chast' 1) // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo.-2010.-2.-C. 10-35.
Kurakin A.V. Kompetentsiya politsii v sfere realizatsii zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya.-2013.-4.-C. 28-48. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.4.8841. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8841.html
Tikhomirov Yu.A., Shakhray S.M. Risk i pravo: Nauchnoe izdanie.-M.: Izdatel'stvo Moskovskogo universiteta, 2012.-64 s.;
Starostin S.A. O protsessual'no-pravovom aspekte administrativnoy otvetstvennosti. Aktual'nye problemy administrativnogo i administrativno-protsessual'nogo prava: materialy ezhegodnoy vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, posvyashchennoy pamyati V.D. Sorokina, 21 marta 2014 goda. V 3-kh chastyakh. SPb: Izd-vo SPb un-ta MVD Rossii, 2014. Ch. 1. S. 183.
Tikhomirov Yu.A. Gosudarstvo: preemstvennost' i novizna: Nauchnoe izdanie.-M.: ID «Yurisprudentsiya», 2011. – 80 s.
Tikhomirov Yu.A. Prognozy i riski v pravovoy sfere // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2014. N 3. S. 5-16.
Rossinskiy B.V. O razgranichenii kompetentsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii i ee sub'ektov v oblasti ukrepleniya administrativnoy otvetstvennosti. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, ¹7, 2001 g. S. 15-23.
Solovey Yu.P. Retsenziya na monografiyu P.P. Serkova "Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' v rossiyskom prave: sovremennoe osmyslenie i novye podkhody" // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2013. N 3. S. 72-80.
Starostin B.A. Nekotorye problemy ustanovleniya i realizatsii administrativnoy otvetstvennosti zakonami sub'ektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2013. N 8. S. 27-29.
Pravovye riski v sisteme publichnogo upravleniya. Kollektivnaya monografiya /Pod nauch. red. V.I. Avdiyskogo, M.A. Lapinoy. M.: Finansovyy universitet pri Pravitel'stve Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 2014.-248 s.
Myshlyaev N.P. Administrativnaya deliktologiya: Voprosy teorii i praktiki. Monografiya. M.: VNII MVD Rossii, 2002.-128 s.
Kontseptsii razvitiya rossiyskogo zakonodatel'stva. Otv.red. T.Ya. Khabrieva, Yu.A. Tikhomirov.-M.: IZiSP, ID «Yurisprudentsiya». 2013. – 104 s.
Lapina M.A. Lektsii 22-24 v: Administrativnoe pravo Rossii: Kurs lektsiy / Pod red. d.yu.n. I.Sh. Kilyaskhanova.-M.: Izd-vo BF MosU MVD Rossii, 2003.
Lapina M.A. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' yuridicheskikh lits: voprosy zakonodatel'nogo regulirovaniya. Aktual'nye problemy administrativnogo i administrativno-protsessual'nogo prava: Materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. M.: MosU MVD Rossii, 2003, S. 385-391;
Bereziy A.E. Dosudebnyy poryadok uregulirovaniya sporov i primiritel'nye protsedury po delam, voznikayushchim iz administrativnykh i inykh publichnykh pravootnosheniy-sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy. Aktual'nye problemy administrativnogo i administrativno-protsessual'nogo prava: materialy ezhegodnoy vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, posvyashchennoy pamyati V.D. Sorokina, 21 marta 2014 goda. V 3-kh chastyakh. SPb: Izd-vo SPb un-ta MVD Rossii, 2014. Ch.
Lapina M.A. Administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya v sisteme administrativnogo protsessa: monografiya. M.: Finansovyy universitet, 2013. 140 s.
Lapina M.A. O razvitii administrativno-yurisdiktsionnogo zakonodatel'stva v finansovoy sfere. Aktual'nye problemy administrativnogo i administrativno-protsessual'nogo prava: materialy ezhegodnoy vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, posvyashchennoy pamyati V.D. Sorokina, 21 marta 2014 goda. V 3-kh chastyakh. SPb: Izd-vo SPb un-ta MVD Rossii, 2014. Ch. 2. S. 11-17.
S. 17-20. 2.Dugenets A.S., Myshlyaev D.N., Shergin A.P. i dr. Osnovnye instituty administrativno-deliktnogo prava / Pod obshchey red. A.P. Shergina. M.: VNII MVD Rossii, 1999.

Abstract: The article concerns characteristic features of evidence in the administrative offences cases, the author substantiates the position that authenticity is a necessary legal quality of evidence along with its relevance and admissibility, characterizing the elements of its nature. Stating authenticity, relevance and admissibility of evidence manifests the formation of evidence as a legal category and possibility for its use in the legal process in order to establish the circumstances, which are relevant for the case. The article singles out the interrelation between authenticity and admissibility, specific features of checking authenticity at various stages of the proceedings in an administrative offence case. The methodological basis for the studies involves general scientific methods (dialectic material, analysis, and synthesis) and specific scientific methods ( systemic-structural, comparative legal, statistical, formal legal) scientific cognition methods. The article includes definition of the terms: characteristic features of evidence, authenticity, relevance and admissibility of evidence. Based upon the study the author makes a conclusion that only the combination of formal examination and free evaluation at various stages of cognition may guarantee adequate studies of the authenticity of the evidence. The first stage of examination is evaluation of procedural form, and the second includes analysis of the contents of the evidence in order to establish the logical propriety, clarity and comprehensive character of the provided data.

Keywords: evidence, characteristic features of evidence, qualities of evidence, nature of evidence, relevance of evidence, admissibility of evidence, authenticity of evidence, evaluation of evidence, proof, definition of evidence.

Contact information: Nobel, Artem Robertovich, 610005, Russia, Kirov, ul. Rozy Lyuksemburg, 84a.

References:
S. V. Lyashkov Sudebnaya praktika kak sredstvo dokazyvaniya v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsessakh Rossii // Pravo i politika.-2012.-4.-C. 696-704.
V. G. Ul'yanov Obyazatel'no li uchastie ponyatykh pri proizvodstve sledstvennykh deystviy? // Pravo i politika.-2012.-6.-C. 1093-1097.
Zagrivko D.S. Printsipy osushchestvleniya administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva Rossii // Pravo i politika.-2014.-2.-C. 181-186. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.2.6738.
Terekhov A.Yu. K voprosu ob osnovaniyakh vybora sposoba sobiraniya dokazatel'stv v khode dosudebnogo proizvodstva po ugolovnomu delu // NB: Rossiyskoe politseyskoe pravo.-2013.-2.-C. 62-76. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4218.2013.2.802. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_802.html
O. P. Nikitina Sudebnyy osmotr dokumenta kak metod proverki dostovernosti zayavleniya o fal'sifikatsii dokazatel'stv v arbitrazhnom protsesse // Pravo i politika.-2012.-9.-C. 1587-1601.
Chushkin S.I. Istochniki dokazatel'stv po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v oblasti dorozhnogo dvizheniya: Diss. kand. yurid. nauk. – M., 2007.
Sheyfer S.A. Dokazatel'stva i dokazyvanie po ugolovnym delam: problemy teorii i pravovogo regulirovaniya
Rebets K.V. Dokumenty kak istochniki dokazatel'stv po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh: diss. kand. yurid. nauk. Omsk, 2009.
Teoriya dokazatel'stv v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse. Chast' obshchaya / Otv. red. N.V. Zhogin. M., 1966.
Pobedkin A.V. Ugolovno-protsessual'noe dokazyvanie. M., 2009.
Orlov Yu.K. Osnovy teorii dokazatel'stv v ugolovnom protsesse. Nauchno-prakticheskoe posobie. M., 2000.
Kurylev S.V. Sushchnost' sudebnykh dokazatel'stv // Tr. Irkutskogo un-ta. T. 17. Irkutsk, 1956.
Kostenko R.V. Teoreticheskie, zakonodatel'nye i pravoprimenitel'nye aspekty ponyatiya ugolovno-protsessual'nykh dokazatel'stv. Krasnodar. 2005.
Gorskiy G.F., Kokorev L.D., El'kind P.S. Problemy dokazatel'stv v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse. Voronezh, 1978.
Dodin E.V. Dokazatel'stva v administrativnom protsesse. M., 1973.
Kipnis N.M. Dopustimost' dokazatel'stv v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. M., 1995.
Vladimirov L.E. Uchenie ob ugolovnykh dokazatel'stvakh. Tula, 2000.
Vasil'ev F.P. Dokazyvanie po delu ob administrativnom pravonarushenii: Diss. dokt. yurid. nauk.-M., 2005.
Belkin A. R. Teoriya dokazyvaniya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. M.: Norma, 2007.
Belkin R.S. Sobiranie, issledovanie i otsenka dokazatel'stv. Sushchnost' i metody. M.,1966.

References (transliteration):
S. V. Lyashkov Sudebnaya praktika kak sredstvo dokazyvaniya v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsessakh Rossii // Pravo i politika.-2012.-4.-C. 696-704.
V. G. Ul'yanov Obyazatel'no li uchastie ponyatykh pri proizvodstve sledstvennykh deystviy? // Pravo i politika.-2012.-6.-C. 1093-1097.
Zagrivko D.S. Printsipy osushchestvleniya administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva Rossii // Pravo i politika.-2014.-2.-C. 181-186. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.2.6738.
Terekhov A.Yu. K voprosu ob osnovaniyakh vybora sposoba sobiraniya dokazatel'stv v khode dosudebnogo proizvodstva po ugolovnomu delu // NB: Rossiyskoe politseyskoe pravo.-2013.-2.-C. 62-76. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4218.2013.2.802. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_802.html
O. P. Nikitina Sudebnyy osmotr dokumenta kak metod proverki dostovernosti zayavleniya o fal'sifikatsii dokazatel'stv v arbitrazhnom protsesse // Pravo i politika.-2012.-9.-C. 1587-1601.
Chushkin S.I. Istochniki dokazatel'stv po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v oblasti dorozhnogo dvizheniya: Diss. kand. yurid. nauk. – M., 2007.
Sheyfer S.A. Dokazatel'stva i dokazyvanie po ugolovnym delam: problemy teorii i pravovogo regulirovaniya
Rebets K.V. Dokumenty kak istochniki dokazatel'stv po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh: diss. kand. yurid. nauk. Omsk, 2009.
Teoriya dokazatel'stv v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse. Chast' obshchaya / Otv. red. N.V. Zhogin. M., 1966.
Pobedkin A.V. Ugolovno-protsessual'noe dokazyvanie. M., 2009.
Orlov Yu.K. Osnovy teorii dokazatel'stv v ugolovnom protsesse. Nauchno-prakticheskoe posobie. M., 2000.
Kurylev S.V. Sushchnost' sudebnykh dokazatel'stv // Tr. Irkutskogo un-ta. T. 17. Irkutsk, 1956.
Kostenko R.V. Teoreticheskie, zakonodatel'nye i pravoprimenitel'nye aspekty ponyatiya ugolovno-protsessual'nykh dokazatel'stv. Krasnodar. 2005.
Gorskiy G.F., Kokorev L.D., El'kind P.S. Problemy dokazatel'stv v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse. Voronezh, 1978.
Dodin E.V. Dokazatel'stva v administrativnom protsesse. M., 1973.
Kipnis N.M. Dopustimost' dokazatel'stv v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. M., 1995.
Vladimirov L.E. Uchenie ob ugolovnykh dokazatel'stvakh. Tula, 2000.
Vasil'ev F.P. Dokazyvanie po delu ob administrativnom pravonarushenii: Diss. dokt. yurid. nauk.-M., 2005.
Belkin A. R. Teoriya dokazyvaniya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. M.: Norma, 2007.
Belkin R.S. Sobiranie, issledovanie i otsenka dokazatel'stv. Sushchnost' i metody. M.,1966.

Abstract: The customs bodies of the Russian Federation have certain amount of competence in the sphere of protection of intellectual property rights. The procedure for the activities of the customs bodies within the administrative mechanism for the protection of intellectual rights is regulated both at legislative and institutional levels. The article concerns the changes in the procedures established for these measures by the customs bodies taking into account the development of modern integration processes. Additionally, the author views the issues of interaction between the Federal Customs Service and the Federal Intellectual Property Service (Rospatent) within the framework of guaranteeing rights of the authors and title holders of relevant rights. The main method for the study was analysis of the latest amendments in the procedure for the activities of the customs bodies within the administrative mechanism for the intellectual property protection. As a specific recommendation the author offers to widen the scope of existing interdepartmental cooperation at the stage of customs declaration and the procedure of inclusion of the intellectual property object into the customs register. The author also has established the cases when the customs bodies do not take measures aimed at interception of the production of goods, which have elements of counterfeit, while evaluating some aspects of judicial practice on the cases of illegal use of trademarks by the natural persons in international post packages. The author pays attention to the possibility for the implementation of the additional competence of the tax bodies in the sphere of intellectual property protection within the framework of the ex officio principle. The author also provides the comparative analysis of legal mechanisms in Russia and in the Republic of Belarus. Evaluation of the existing procedure for the measures of the customs bodies for the protection of intellectual property rights allows one to draw a conclusion that there is a sustainable tendency for the unification of administrative procedures in the sphere of protection of intellectual property rights at both national and supranational (regional) levels.

Keywords: customs bodies, intellectual property objects, customs register, procedure, release of goods, title holder, declaratory, Rospatent, interdepartmental cooperation, the Customs Union.

Contact information: Agamagomedova, Saniyat Abdulganievna, 440026, Russia, Penza, Krasnaya, 40.

References:
Vakhrameev R.G. Mekhanizm pravovogo regulirovaniya konstitutsionnogo prava na informatsiyu // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2013.-¹12.-C. 23-34. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_9854.html.
B.A. Shakhnazarov Modernizatsiya prava intellektual'noy sobstvennosti RF v usloviyakh chlenstva v VTO // LEX RUSSICA (RUSSKIY ZAKON).-2013.-3.-C. 291-301.
Agamagomedova S.A. Pravovye osnovy i osobennosti administrativnoy zashchity olimpiyskoy i paralimpiyskoy simvoliki tamozhennymi organami Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo.-2012.-9.-C. 81-91.
Gulyaikhin V.N. Strukturno-funktsional'nye osobennosti razlichnykh sostoyaniy pravosoznaniya cheloveka // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2012.-¹2.-C. 90-116. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2012.2.153. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_153.html.
Babin B.V. Pravo sobstvennosti narodov: mezhdunarodnoe i natsional'noe izmereniya // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2013.-¹10.-C. 12-34. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_9469.html.
Agamagomedova S.A. Tamozhennyy postkontrol' v otnoshenii tovarov, soderzhashchikh ob'ekty intellektual'noy sobstvennosti // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya.-2013.-¹2.-C. 105-121. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_625.html.
O. V. Markova Perspektivy pravovoy zashchity intellektual'noy sobstvennosti i sposoby ukrepleniya ustoychivogo elementa sistemy pravovoy zashchity intellektual'noy sobstvennosti // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2012.-¹6.-C. 101-106. URL: http://www.nbpublish.com/go_to_article.php?id=18702.
Agamagomedova S.A. Tamozhennyy postkontrol' v otnoshenii tovarov, soderzhashchikh ob'ekty intellektual'noy sobstvennosti // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya.-2013.-2.-C. 105-121. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_625.html
Edinyy tamozhennyy reestr ob'ektov intellektual'noy sobstvennosti gosudarstv-chlenov Tamozhennogo soyuza. Ofitsial'nyy sayt Evraziyskoy ekonomicheskoy komissii. Elektronnyy resurs. http://www.eurasiancommission.org/ru/docs/Pages/intellectual.aspx. Data obr. 15.01.2014.
"Kommentariy k proektu protokola o vnesenii izmeneniy v dogovor o Tamozhennom kodekse Tamozhennogo soyuza ot 27 noyabrya 2009 goda i prekrashchenii deystviya nekotorykh mezhdunarodnykh dogovorov, sostavlyayushchikh dogovorno-pravovuyu bazu Tamozhennogo soyuza". Elektronnyy resurs. Konsul'tantPlyus: Pravovye novosti. Spetsial'nyy vypusk.
Postanovlenie Suda po intellektual'nym pravam ot 23 sentyabrya 2013 g. po delu ¹ A21-9820/2012. Elektronnyy resurs. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Tamozhennyy kodeks Respubliki Belarus' ot 4 yanvarya 2007 g. ¹ 204-Z. Elektronnyy resurs. http://etalonline.by/?type=text®num=Hk0700204#innerNavigate_962. Data obr. 27.12.2013.
Proekt zakona Respubliki Belarus' «O tamozhennom regulirovanii v Respublike Belarus'». Elektronnyy resurs. http://gtk.gov.by/nfiles/001572_901243__gtk.doc. Data obr. 07.01.2014.
Rasporyazhenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 28.12.2012 ¹ 2575-r «O Strategii razvitiya tamozhennoy sluzhby Rossiyskoy Federatsii do 2020 goda». Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 14 yanvarya 2013 g. ¹ 2. St. 109.
Tamozhennyy kodeks Tamozhennogo soyuza (prilozhenie k Dogovoru o Tamozhennom kodekse tamozhennogo soyuza, prinyatomu Resheniem Mezhgosudarstvennogo Soveta Evraziyskogo ekonomicheskogo soobshchestva ot 27 noyabrya 2009 g. ¹ 17) // Konsul'tant Plyus: [Elektronnyy resurs]. http://www.consultant.ru.
Postanovlenie Oktyabr'skogo rayonnogo suda g. Penzy ot 28.11.2014 po delu ¹ 5-336/13. Po materialam deyatel'nosti Penzenskogo oblastnogo tamozhennogo posta Saratovskoy tamozhni.
Sergeev A. P. Pravo intellektual'noy sobstvennosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii : ucheb.  2-e izd., pererab. i dop. – M. : TK Velbi ; Prospekt, 2004. – S. 390.
Budaeva E. V. Tamozhennye instituty i zashchita ekonomicheskikh interesov otechestvennykh uchastnikov rynka ob'ektov intellektual'noy sobstvennosti // Aktual'nye problemy zashchity intellektual'noy sobstvennosti tamozhennymi organami : sb. st. po rezul'tatam provedeniya nauch.-prak¬t. konf. fakul'teta tamozhennogo dela i kafedry tamozhennykh platezhey i valyutnogo kontrolya Rossiyskoy tamozhennoy akademii.  M. : Izd-vo Rossiyskoy tamozhennoy akademii, 2011. – S. 4751; Federal'naya tamozhennaya sluzhba khochet poluchit' pravo samostoyatel'no kontrolirovat' podlinnost' tovarnykh znakov. «FK-NOVOSTI».  URL: http:// www.fcinfo.ru/themes/ba¬sic/map-print.asp?folder=1506&prn=93619%3A1857 (data obrashcheniya: 01.03.2012) ; Tyunin M. Tamozhennyy kontrol' v otnoshenii tovarov, soderzhashchikh ob'ekty intellektual'noy sobstvennosti // Khozyaystvo i pravo.  2007.  ¹ 7.  S. 92.
Soglashenie o vzaimodeystvii Federal'noy tamozhennoy sluzhby i Federal'noy sluzhby po intellektual'noy sobstvennosti, patentam i tovarnym znakam (utv. FTS RF ¹ 01-08/0022, Rospatentom ¹ 10/37-443/2 30.07.2007) (red. ot 08.05.2009). Elektronnyy resurs. SPS «Garant».
Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 24.05.2011 ¹ 673 (red. ot 27.06.2012) "O Federal'noy sluzhbe po intellektual'noy sobstvennosti". Elektronnyy resurs. SPS «Garant».
Prikaz FTS RF ot 25.03.2011 ¹ 626 «Ob utverzhdenii Poryadka deystviy tamozhennykh organov Rossiyskoy Federatsii pri prinyatii mer po zashchite prav na ob'ekty intellektual'noy sobstvennosti» (v red. Prikaza FTS Rossii ot 10.04.2013 ¹ 691). Elektronnyy resurs. SPS «Garant».

References (transliteration):
Vakhrameev R.G. Mekhanizm pravovogo regulirovaniya konstitutsionnogo prava na informatsiyu // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2013.-¹12.-C. 23-34. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_9854.html.
B.A. Shakhnazarov Modernizatsiya prava intellektual'noy sobstvennosti RF v usloviyakh chlenstva v VTO // LEX RUSSICA (RUSSKIY ZAKON).-2013.-3.-C. 291-301.
Agamagomedova S.A. Pravovye osnovy i osobennosti administrativnoy zashchity olimpiyskoy i paralimpiyskoy simvoliki tamozhennymi organami Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo.-2012.-9.-C. 81-91.
Gulyaikhin V.N. Strukturno-funktsional'nye osobennosti razlichnykh sostoyaniy pravosoznaniya cheloveka // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2012.-¹2.-C. 90-116. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2012.2.153. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_153.html.
Babin B.V. Pravo sobstvennosti narodov: mezhdunarodnoe i natsional'noe izmereniya // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2013.-¹10.-C. 12-34. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_9469.html.
Agamagomedova S.A. Tamozhennyy postkontrol' v otnoshenii tovarov, soderzhashchikh ob'ekty intellektual'noy sobstvennosti // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya.-2013.-¹2.-C. 105-121. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_625.html.
O. V. Markova Perspektivy pravovoy zashchity intellektual'noy sobstvennosti i sposoby ukrepleniya ustoychivogo elementa sistemy pravovoy zashchity intellektual'noy sobstvennosti // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2012.-¹6.-C. 101-106. URL: http://www.nbpublish.com/go_to_article.php?id=18702.
Agamagomedova S.A. Tamozhennyy postkontrol' v otnoshenii tovarov, soderzhashchikh ob'ekty intellektual'noy sobstvennosti // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya.-2013.-2.-C. 105-121. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_625.html
Edinyy tamozhennyy reestr ob'ektov intellektual'noy sobstvennosti gosudarstv-chlenov Tamozhennogo soyuza. Ofitsial'nyy sayt Evraziyskoy ekonomicheskoy komissii. Elektronnyy resurs. http://www.eurasiancommission.org/ru/docs/Pages/intellectual.aspx. Data obr. 15.01.2014.
"Kommentariy k proektu protokola o vnesenii izmeneniy v dogovor o Tamozhennom kodekse Tamozhennogo soyuza ot 27 noyabrya 2009 goda i prekrashchenii deystviya nekotorykh mezhdunarodnykh dogovorov, sostavlyayushchikh dogovorno-pravovuyu bazu Tamozhennogo soyuza". Elektronnyy resurs. Konsul'tantPlyus: Pravovye novosti. Spetsial'nyy vypusk.
Postanovlenie Suda po intellektual'nym pravam ot 23 sentyabrya 2013 g. po delu ¹ A21-9820/2012. Elektronnyy resurs. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Tamozhennyy kodeks Respubliki Belarus' ot 4 yanvarya 2007 g. ¹ 204-Z. Elektronnyy resurs. http://etalonline.by/?type=text®num=Hk0700204#innerNavigate_962. Data obr. 27.12.2013.
Proekt zakona Respubliki Belarus' «O tamozhennom regulirovanii v Respublike Belarus'». Elektronnyy resurs. http://gtk.gov.by/nfiles/001572_901243__gtk.doc. Data obr. 07.01.2014.
Rasporyazhenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 28.12.2012 ¹ 2575-r «O Strategii razvitiya tamozhennoy sluzhby Rossiyskoy Federatsii do 2020 goda». Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 14 yanvarya 2013 g. ¹ 2. St. 109.
Tamozhennyy kodeks Tamozhennogo soyuza (prilozhenie k Dogovoru o Tamozhennom kodekse tamozhennogo soyuza, prinyatomu Resheniem Mezhgosudarstvennogo Soveta Evraziyskogo ekonomicheskogo soobshchestva ot 27 noyabrya 2009 g. ¹ 17) // Konsul'tant Plyus: [Elektronnyy resurs]. http://www.consultant.ru.
Postanovlenie Oktyabr'skogo rayonnogo suda g. Penzy ot 28.11.2014 po delu ¹ 5-336/13. Po materialam deyatel'nosti Penzenskogo oblastnogo tamozhennogo posta Saratovskoy tamozhni.
Sergeev A. P. Pravo intellektual'noy sobstvennosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii : ucheb.  2-e izd., pererab. i dop. – M. : TK Velbi ; Prospekt, 2004. – S. 390.
Budaeva E. V. Tamozhennye instituty i zashchita ekonomicheskikh interesov otechestvennykh uchastnikov rynka ob'ektov intellektual'noy sobstvennosti // Aktual'nye problemy zashchity intellektual'noy sobstvennosti tamozhennymi organami : sb. st. po rezul'tatam provedeniya nauch.-prak¬t. konf. fakul'teta tamozhennogo dela i kafedry tamozhennykh platezhey i valyutnogo kontrolya Rossiyskoy tamozhennoy akademii.  M. : Izd-vo Rossiyskoy tamozhennoy akademii, 2011. – S. 4751; Federal'naya tamozhennaya sluzhba khochet poluchit' pravo samostoyatel'no kontrolirovat' podlinnost' tovarnykh znakov. «FK-NOVOSTI».  URL: http:// www.fcinfo.ru/themes/ba¬sic/map-print.asp?folder=1506&prn=93619%3A1857 (data obrashcheniya: 01.03.2012) ; Tyunin M. Tamozhennyy kontrol' v otnoshenii tovarov, soderzhashchikh ob'ekty intellektual'noy sobstvennosti // Khozyaystvo i pravo.  2007.  ¹ 7.  S. 92.
Soglashenie o vzaimodeystvii Federal'noy tamozhennoy sluzhby i Federal'noy sluzhby po intellektual'noy sobstvennosti, patentam i tovarnym znakam (utv. FTS RF ¹ 01-08/0022, Rospatentom ¹ 10/37-443/2 30.07.2007) (red. ot 08.05.2009). Elektronnyy resurs. SPS «Garant».
Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 24.05.2011 ¹ 673 (red. ot 27.06.2012) "O Federal'noy sluzhbe po intellektual'noy sobstvennosti". Elektronnyy resurs. SPS «Garant».
Prikaz FTS RF ot 25.03.2011 ¹ 626 «Ob utverzhdenii Poryadka deystviy tamozhennykh organov Rossiyskoy Federatsii pri prinyatii mer po zashchite prav na ob'ekty intellektual'noy sobstvennosti» (v red. Prikaza FTS Rossii ot 10.04.2013 ¹ 691). Elektronnyy resurs. SPS «Garant».

Abstract: The article provides characteristics of customs services provided by the customs bodies within the framework of its copyright protection function. Distinguishing the terms “state function” and “state service”, the author singles out the system of customs services (general and specific) within the implementation of copyright protection by the customs bodies. Such services include consulting and provision of information by customs bodies, maintaining the customs register of copyright objects and a number of customs procedures. Efficient implementation of the said function of the customs bodies in the sphere of protection of copyright objects is based upon the combination of the special and general services to the customers, who are first of all the holders of exclusive titles to copyright objects.

Keywords: customs bodies, customs services, functions of customs bodies, customers for customs services, customs register, information, consulting, administrative regulation, quality of customs services, copyright object.

Contact information: Agamagomedova, Saniyat Abdulganievna, 440026, Russia, Penza, ul. Krasnaya, 40.

References:
Makrusev V.V. Gosudarstvennye tamozhennye uslugi: monografiya / V.V. Makrusev, A.V. Safronov. – 2-e izd. – M.: Izd-vo Rossiyskoy tamozhennoy akademii, 2011.
Obrashchenie OAO «Konditerskiy kontsern Babaevskiy» o tovarnykh znakakh. URL: http://www.babaev.ru/about/pressa13.html (data obrashcheniya: 25.07.2013).
Osnovy tamozhennogo dela: uchebnik / pod obshch. red. A.Ya. Chernysha, d-ra voen. nauk, prof. M.: Izd-vo Rossiyskoy tamozhennoy akademii, 2012.
Prikaz FTS Rossii ot 09.06.2012 N 1128 "Ob utverzhdenii Administrativnogo reglamenta Federal'noy tamozhennoy sluzhby po predostavleniyu gosudarstvennoy uslugi po informirovaniyu ob aktakh tamozhennogo zakonodatel'stva Tamozhennogo soyuza, zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii o tamozhennom dele i ob inykh pravovykh aktakh Rossiyskoy Federatsii v oblasti tamozhennogo dela i konsul'tirovaniyu po voprosam tamozhennogo dela i inym voprosam, vkhodyashchim v kompetentsiyu tamozhennykh organov" (Zaregistrirovano v Minyuste Rossii 10.07.2012 N 24873) // "Rossiyskaya gazeta", ¹ 174, 01.08.2012.
Prikaz FTS RF ot 13.08.2009 ¹ 1488 «Ob utverzhdenii Administrativnogo reglamenta Federal'noy tamozhennoy sluzhby po ispolneniyu gosudarstvennoy funktsii po vedeniyu tamozhennogo reestra ob'ektov intellektual'noy sobstvennosti» (Zaregistrirovano v Minyuste RF 14.12.2009 ¹ 15592). Elektronnyy resurs. SPS «Garant».
Prikaz FTS Rossii ot 26.12.2012 ¹ 2656 «Ob utverzhdenii Reglamenta Federal'noy tamozhennoy sluzhby» (Zaregistrirovano v Minyuste Rossii 26.03.2013 N 27888). Elektronnyy resurs. SPS «Garant».
Rasporyazhenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 28.12.2012 ¹ 2575-r «O Strategii razvitiya tamozhennoy sluzhby Rossiyskoy Federatsii do 2020 goda». Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 14 yanvarya 2013 g. ¹ 2. St. 109.
Simakhin O.G. Teoreticheskoe obosnovanie struktury i poryadka funktsionirovaniya innovatsionnoy sistemy upravleniya gosudarstvennymi tamozhennymi uslugami / Vestnik Rossiyskoy tamozhennoy akademii. 2011. ¹ 4.
Tamozhennyy reestr ob'ektov intellektual'noy sobstvennosti (po sostoyaniyu na 04.10.2013 goda) / Elektronnyy resurs. Ofitsial'nyy sayt FTS Rossii. http://ved.customs.ru/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=109:2010-09-09-06-26-44&catid=13:2008-10-16-13-51-15&Itemid=1814. Data obr. 13.10.2013.
Trunina, E. V. Gosudarstvennye uslugi tamozhennykh organov: priznaki, vidy, problemy opredeleniya / E. V. Trunina // Sovremennoe pravo .-2009.-¹ 8.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 27.07.2010 N 210-FZ (red. ot 23.07.2013) "Ob organizatsii predostavleniya gosudarstvennykh i munitsipal'nykh uslug". Elektronnyy resurs. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Federal'nyy zakon Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 27 noyabrya 2010 g. ¹ 311-FZ «O tamozhennom regulirovanii v Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 29 noyabrya 2010 goda.

References (transliteration):
Makrusev V.V. Gosudarstvennye tamozhennye uslugi: monografiya / V.V. Makrusev, A.V. Safronov. – 2-e izd. – M.: Izd-vo Rossiyskoy tamozhennoy akademii, 2011.
Obrashchenie OAO «Konditerskiy kontsern Babaevskiy» o tovarnykh znakakh. URL: http://www.babaev.ru/about/pressa13.html (data obrashcheniya: 25.07.2013).
Osnovy tamozhennogo dela: uchebnik / pod obshch. red. A.Ya. Chernysha, d-ra voen. nauk, prof. M.: Izd-vo Rossiyskoy tamozhennoy akademii, 2012.
Prikaz FTS Rossii ot 09.06.2012 N 1128 "Ob utverzhdenii Administrativnogo reglamenta Federal'noy tamozhennoy sluzhby po predostavleniyu gosudarstvennoy uslugi po informirovaniyu ob aktakh tamozhennogo zakonodatel'stva Tamozhennogo soyuza, zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii o tamozhennom dele i ob inykh pravovykh aktakh Rossiyskoy Federatsii v oblasti tamozhennogo dela i konsul'tirovaniyu po voprosam tamozhennogo dela i inym voprosam, vkhodyashchim v kompetentsiyu tamozhennykh organov" (Zaregistrirovano v Minyuste Rossii 10.07.2012 N 24873) // "Rossiyskaya gazeta", ¹ 174, 01.08.2012.
Prikaz FTS RF ot 13.08.2009 ¹ 1488 «Ob utverzhdenii Administrativnogo reglamenta Federal'noy tamozhennoy sluzhby po ispolneniyu gosudarstvennoy funktsii po vedeniyu tamozhennogo reestra ob'ektov intellektual'noy sobstvennosti» (Zaregistrirovano v Minyuste RF 14.12.2009 ¹ 15592). Elektronnyy resurs. SPS «Garant».
Prikaz FTS Rossii ot 26.12.2012 ¹ 2656 «Ob utverzhdenii Reglamenta Federal'noy tamozhennoy sluzhby» (Zaregistrirovano v Minyuste Rossii 26.03.2013 N 27888). Elektronnyy resurs. SPS «Garant».
Rasporyazhenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 28.12.2012 ¹ 2575-r «O Strategii razvitiya tamozhennoy sluzhby Rossiyskoy Federatsii do 2020 goda». Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 14 yanvarya 2013 g. ¹ 2. St. 109.
Simakhin O.G. Teoreticheskoe obosnovanie struktury i poryadka funktsionirovaniya innovatsionnoy sistemy upravleniya gosudarstvennymi tamozhennymi uslugami / Vestnik Rossiyskoy tamozhennoy akademii. 2011. ¹ 4.
Tamozhennyy reestr ob'ektov intellektual'noy sobstvennosti (po sostoyaniyu na 04.10.2013 goda) / Elektronnyy resurs. Ofitsial'nyy sayt FTS Rossii. http://ved.customs.ru/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=109:2010-09-09-06-26-44&catid=13:2008-10-16-13-51-15&Itemid=1814. Data obr. 13.10.2013.
Trunina, E. V. Gosudarstvennye uslugi tamozhennykh organov: priznaki, vidy, problemy opredeleniya / E. V. Trunina // Sovremennoe pravo .-2009.-¹ 8.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 27.07.2010 N 210-FZ (red. ot 23.07.2013) "Ob organizatsii predostavleniya gosudarstvennykh i munitsipal'nykh uslug". Elektronnyy resurs. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Federal'nyy zakon Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 27 noyabrya 2010 g. ¹ 311-FZ «O tamozhennom regulirovanii v Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 29 noyabrya 2010 goda.

Abstract: The studies of administrative legal position of participants of the administrative offence cases shows that the problem of guaranteeing rights and lawful interests of a person in the proceedings on administrative offence cases has several main aspects regarding proceedings on administrative offence cases, application of administrative coercion measures, activities of the state in the sphere of guaranteeing rights and lawful interests of natural persons and legal entities in the administrative legal sphere. The author of the article notes importance of the improvement of the procedural status of the participant of the proceedings on administrative offence cases. The methodological basis for the studies was formed by the modern achievements of cognition theory. In the process of preparation of this article the authors used general philosophical, theoretical and empiric methods (dialectics, systemic method, analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, observation, modeling), traditional legal methods (formal logic method), and methods typical for specific sociological studies (statistical, expert evaluation, etc.). The studies of administrative procedural status of the participants of proceedings on administrative offence cases are quite topical. It is due to a number of circumstances, one of which is the fact that for all of the branches of law “legal position of the subject of law” is a key category, revealing a number of substantial legal institutions. Additionally, the development of Russian legislation on administrative offenses may be characterized by a number of contradictions in the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation, which form obstacles for the achievement of all of the goals of the proceedings on administrative offences cases.

Keywords: delict, delictual dispositive capacity, legal personality, transactional capacity, sanction, responsibility, status, participant, punishment, sanction.

Contact information: Serov, Aleksandr Sergeevich, 111395, Russia, Moskva, ul. Yunosti, 5.

References:
Alekseev S.S. Obshchaya teoriya sovetskogo prava.-M., 1982. T.
Aleksandrov N.G. Zakonnost' i pravootnosheniya v sovetskom obshchestve.-M., 1985.
Bratus' S.N. Sub'ekty grazhdanskogo prava.-M., 1950.
Blazhko A.K. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' za pravonarusheniya, primenyaemaya v sudebnom poryadke: Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk.-L., 1970.
Teoriya gosudarstva i prava / Pod red. V.K. Babaeva.-M., 1999.
Gatinyan A.A. Pravovoy status i osushchestvlenie strukturnykh elementov norm // Problemy pravovogo statusa sub'ektov prava.-Kaliningrad, 1976.
Galagan I.A. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' v SSSR (protsessual'noe regulirovanie).-Voronezh, 1976.
Gavrilenko D.A., Podupeyko A.A. Problemy administrativnoy otvetstvennosti spetsial'nykh sub'ektov // Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost'. Problemy teorii i praktiki.-Minsk, 1996.
Denisov Yu.A. Obshchaya teoriya pravonarusheniya i otvetstvennosti.-L., 1983.
Zheruolis I.A. Sudoproizvodstvo po administrativnym delam // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo.-1970.-¹ 2.
Ispolnitel'naya vlast' v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Problemy razvitiya / Pod red. I.L. Bachilo.-M., 1998.
Kotlyarevskiy G.S., Nazarov B.L. Problemy teorii prava: Vyp. 1.-M., 1973.
Koval' L.V. Administrativno-deliktnoe otnoshenie.-Kiev, 1979.
Kozlov Yu.M. Sushchnost' i vidy administrativnogo protsessa // Administrativnoe pravo Rossii / Pod red. Yu.M. Kozlova, L.L. Popova.-M., 1999.
Lazarev B.M. Kompetentsiya organov upravleniya.-M., 1972.
Matveev S.I. Ponyatie i vidy spetsial'nykh sub'ektov administrativnoy otvetstvennosti // Kodeks RSFSR ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh: voprosy okhrany sotsialisticheskoy sobstvennosti i obshchestvennogo poryadka.-Gor'kiy, 1985.
Mikhaylov A.A. Litsa, uchastvuyushchie v proizvodstve po delu ob administrativnom pravonarushenii // Kodeks RSFSR ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh: voprosy okhrany sotsialisticheskoy sobstvennosti i obshchestvennogo poryadka.-Gor'kiy, 1985.
Mishkinis A.P. Uchastniki proizvodstva po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh: Dis. … kand. yurid. nauk.-M., 1986.
Maslennikov M.Ya. Polnomochiya sud'i rayonnogo suda pri rassmotrenii del ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya.-2002.-¹ 7.
Novikov V.P. Novikov V.P. Fizicheskie i yuridicheskie litsa kak poterpevshie po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh: Dis. … kand. yurid. nauk.-M., 2004.
Sorokin V.D. Administrativno-protsessual'noe pravo.-M., 1972.
Tikhomirov Yu.A. Teoriya kompetentsii.-M., 2001.
Shergin A.P. Administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya.-M., 1979.
Yakimov A.Yu. Status sub'ekta administrativnoy yurisdiktsii i problemy ego realizatsii.-M., 1999.
Kupreev S.S. Pravovaya otvetstvennost' gosudarstva pri primenenii mer obespecheniya proizvodstva po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2010. - 4. - C. 70 - 75.
Kurakin A.V. Kompetentsiya politsii v sfere realizatsii zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 28 - 48. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8841.html

References (transliteration):
Alekseev S.S. Obshchaya teoriya sovetskogo prava.-M., 1982. T.
Aleksandrov N.G. Zakonnost' i pravootnosheniya v sovetskom obshchestve.-M., 1985.
Bratus' S.N. Sub'ekty grazhdanskogo prava.-M., 1950.
Blazhko A.K. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' za pravonarusheniya, primenyaemaya v sudebnom poryadke: Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk.-L., 1970.
Teoriya gosudarstva i prava / Pod red. V.K. Babaeva.-M., 1999.
Gatinyan A.A. Pravovoy status i osushchestvlenie strukturnykh elementov norm // Problemy pravovogo statusa sub'ektov prava.-Kaliningrad, 1976.
Galagan I.A. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' v SSSR (protsessual'noe regulirovanie).-Voronezh, 1976.
Gavrilenko D.A., Podupeyko A.A. Problemy administrativnoy otvetstvennosti spetsial'nykh sub'ektov // Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost'. Problemy teorii i praktiki.-Minsk, 1996.
Denisov Yu.A. Obshchaya teoriya pravonarusheniya i otvetstvennosti.-L., 1983.
Zheruolis I.A. Sudoproizvodstvo po administrativnym delam // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo.-1970.-¹ 2.
Ispolnitel'naya vlast' v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Problemy razvitiya / Pod red. I.L. Bachilo.-M., 1998.
Kotlyarevskiy G.S., Nazarov B.L. Problemy teorii prava: Vyp. 1.-M., 1973.
Koval' L.V. Administrativno-deliktnoe otnoshenie.-Kiev, 1979.
Kozlov Yu.M. Sushchnost' i vidy administrativnogo protsessa // Administrativnoe pravo Rossii / Pod red. Yu.M. Kozlova, L.L. Popova.-M., 1999.
Lazarev B.M. Kompetentsiya organov upravleniya.-M., 1972.
Matveev S.I. Ponyatie i vidy spetsial'nykh sub'ektov administrativnoy otvetstvennosti // Kodeks RSFSR ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh: voprosy okhrany sotsialisticheskoy sobstvennosti i obshchestvennogo poryadka.-Gor'kiy, 1985.
Mikhaylov A.A. Litsa, uchastvuyushchie v proizvodstve po delu ob administrativnom pravonarushenii // Kodeks RSFSR ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh: voprosy okhrany sotsialisticheskoy sobstvennosti i obshchestvennogo poryadka.-Gor'kiy, 1985.
Mishkinis A.P. Uchastniki proizvodstva po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh: Dis. … kand. yurid. nauk.-M., 1986.
Maslennikov M.Ya. Polnomochiya sud'i rayonnogo suda pri rassmotrenii del ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya.-2002.-¹ 7.
Novikov V.P. Novikov V.P. Fizicheskie i yuridicheskie litsa kak poterpevshie po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh: Dis. … kand. yurid. nauk.-M., 2004.
Sorokin V.D. Administrativno-protsessual'noe pravo.-M., 1972.
Tikhomirov Yu.A. Teoriya kompetentsii.-M., 2001.
Shergin A.P. Administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya.-M., 1979.
Yakimov A.Yu. Status sub'ekta administrativnoy yurisdiktsii i problemy ego realizatsii.-M., 1999.
Kupreev S.S. Pravovaya otvetstvennost' gosudarstva pri primenenii mer obespecheniya proizvodstva po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2010. - 4. - C. 70 - 75.
Kurakin A.V. Kompetentsiya politsii v sfere realizatsii zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 28 - 48. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8841.html

Abstract: Based upon the comparative analysis of legal practice the author analyzes topical issues regarding implementation of a number of provisions of the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation regulating the proceedings on administrative offences cases in part of the appeals, and the cases when the decision is terminated and the case is returned for the new proceedings, and also the situation when the court establishes that the primary decision was terminated by a higher instance administrative body (official) after taking up an appeal. In the process of the studies the author used the general scientific methods (formal logic, systemic method, analysis) and the specific legal scientific methods (comparative legal studies, formal legal method, etc.). Based upon the results of the study the author offers possible solutions for the topical problems regarding application of procedural provisions of the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation and also makes proposals for the amendments to the Code in order to fill the gaps and to unify the practice of its application.

Keywords: court, administrative offence, appeal, review, resolution, administrative body, procedural violation, return of the protocol, restoring the procedural period, injunctions.

Contact information: Stepanova, Olga Aleksandrovna, 101000, Russia, Moskva, Malyi Kharitonievskiy per., 12.

References:
Absalyamov A.V. Administrativnoe sudoproizvodstvo v arbitrazhnom sude. Teoretiko-metodologicheskie aspekty: Diss. … dokt. yurid. nauk: 12.00.14. Moskva. 2009.
Golovko V.V., Moskalenko S.S. Peresmotr postanovleniy po delu ob administrativnom pravonarushenii // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2007. ¹ 1.
Dugenets A.S. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' v rossiyskom prave: Diss. … dokt. yurid. nauk: 12.00.14. M., 2005.
Dugenets A.S., Maslennikov M.Ya. Garantii zakonnosti proizvodstve po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Nauchnyy portal MVD Rossii. 2011. ¹ 2.
Kodzaev Ch.S. Peresmotr postanovleniy po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh: Avtoref. diss. … kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.14. Rostov-na-Donu. 2010.
Kozlov S.S., Kuratov A.A. Protsessual'nye osobennosti peresmotra administrativnykh del sudami obshchey yurisdiktsii: problemy teorii i praktiki // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. 2010. ¹ 1.
Lavrent'ev A.R. Ob obzhalovanii v sud postanovleniy i resheniy po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Antologiya nauchnoy mysli: K 10-letiyu Rossiyskoy akademii pravosudiya: Sbornik statey / Otv. red. V.V. Ershov, N.A. Tuzov. M.: Statut, 2008. S. 473-493 // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Maslennikov M.Ya. Administrativno-yurisdiktsionnyy protsess. Sushchnost' i aktual'nye voprosy pravoprimeneniya po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh. Voronezh. Izd-vo Voronezhskogo universiteta. 1990.
Maslennikov M.Ya. Poryadok peresmotra sudami obshchey yurisdiktsii postanovleniy po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. 2004. ¹ 10; Postateynyy kommentariy k Kodeksu RF ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh / D.S. Velieva, A.S. Ermakova, Yu.V. Kapitanets i dr.; pod red. E.G. Lipatova, S.E. Channova. M.: GrossMedia, ROSBUKh, 2008.
Maslennikov M.Ya. Poryadok peresmotra sudami obshchey yurisdiktsii postanovleniy po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. 2004. ¹ 10.
Pankova O.V. Aktual'nye problemy obzhalovaniya postanovleniy po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v praktike sudov obshchey yurisdiktsii // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2005. ¹ 3.
Podval'nyy I.O. K voprosam administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva, voznikayushchim v praktike arbitrazhnykh sudov // Arbitrazhnye spory. 2012. ¹ 1.
Khazanov S.D. Obshchaya kharakteristika stadii peresmotra v proizvodstve po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2004. ¹ 10.
Shagabutdinov A.A. Povorot k khudshemu pri peresmotre postanovleniya, resheniy po delu ob administrativnom pravonarushenii // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. 2005. ¹ 6

References (transliteration):
Absalyamov A.V. Administrativnoe sudoproizvodstvo v arbitrazhnom sude. Teoretiko-metodologicheskie aspekty: Diss. … dokt. yurid. nauk: 12.00.14. Moskva. 2009.
Golovko V.V., Moskalenko S.S. Peresmotr postanovleniy po delu ob administrativnom pravonarushenii // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2007. ¹ 1.
Dugenets A.S. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' v rossiyskom prave: Diss. … dokt. yurid. nauk: 12.00.14. M., 2005.
Dugenets A.S., Maslennikov M.Ya. Garantii zakonnosti proizvodstve po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Nauchnyy portal MVD Rossii. 2011. ¹ 2.
Kodzaev Ch.S. Peresmotr postanovleniy po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh: Avtoref. diss. … kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.14. Rostov-na-Donu. 2010.
Kozlov S.S., Kuratov A.A. Protsessual'nye osobennosti peresmotra administrativnykh del sudami obshchey yurisdiktsii: problemy teorii i praktiki // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. 2010. ¹ 1.
Lavrent'ev A.R. Ob obzhalovanii v sud postanovleniy i resheniy po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Antologiya nauchnoy mysli: K 10-letiyu Rossiyskoy akademii pravosudiya: Sbornik statey / Otv. red. V.V. Ershov, N.A. Tuzov. M.: Statut, 2008. S. 473-493 // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Maslennikov M.Ya. Administrativno-yurisdiktsionnyy protsess. Sushchnost' i aktual'nye voprosy pravoprimeneniya po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh. Voronezh. Izd-vo Voronezhskogo universiteta. 1990.
Maslennikov M.Ya. Poryadok peresmotra sudami obshchey yurisdiktsii postanovleniy po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. 2004. ¹ 10; Postateynyy kommentariy k Kodeksu RF ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh / D.S. Velieva, A.S. Ermakova, Yu.V. Kapitanets i dr.; pod red. E.G. Lipatova, S.E. Channova. M.: GrossMedia, ROSBUKh, 2008.
Maslennikov M.Ya. Poryadok peresmotra sudami obshchey yurisdiktsii postanovleniy po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. 2004. ¹ 10.
Pankova O.V. Aktual'nye problemy obzhalovaniya postanovleniy po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v praktike sudov obshchey yurisdiktsii // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2005. ¹ 3.
Podval'nyy I.O. K voprosam administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva, voznikayushchim v praktike arbitrazhnykh sudov // Arbitrazhnye spory. 2012. ¹ 1.
Khazanov S.D. Obshchaya kharakteristika stadii peresmotra v proizvodstve po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2004. ¹ 10.
Shagabutdinov A.A. Povorot k khudshemu pri peresmotre postanovleniya, resheniy po delu ob administrativnom pravonarushenii // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. 2005. ¹ 6

Abstract: A significant share of environmental offences and grievous harm to environment caused by them determine topicality of the analysis of the problems in the sphere of evidence and proof in administrative cases on environmental offences. The article includes analysis of the event of an administrative offence and its constituent elements, and the event is included within the scope of proving on in an administrative case. The author singles out material legal and procedural value of establishing place, time, means and other circumstances of an administrative offence. Based upon the analysis of judicial decisions on administrative offence cases in the sphere of environment protection the author points out the need to fully and precisely define the event of an offence. The author pays attention to the judicial practice on the cases on termination of the proceedings in administrative offence cases due to the lack of detailed description of the event of an offence. Based upon the study the author formulates propositions for the improvement of the current administrative legislation.

Keywords: administrative responsibility, proceedings on a case, object of proof, circumstances due for proving, place of offence, time of offence, means of committing an offence, other circumstances, proving.

Contact information: Nobel, Artem Robertovich, 610005, Russia, Kirov, ul. Rozy Lyuksemburg, 84a.

References:
Vasil'ev F.P. Dokazyvanie po delu ob administrativnom pravonarushenii: Diss. dokt. yurid. nauk.-M., 2005.
Gorskiy G.F. Problemy dokazatel'stv v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse/ G.F. Gorskiy, L.D. Kokorev, P.S. El'kind. – Voronezh: VGU, 1978.
Davletov A.A. Osnovy ugolovno-protsessual'nogo poznaniya. Sverdlovsk, 1991.
Vladimirov L.E. Uchenie ob ugolovnykh dokazatel'stvakh. SPb., 1910.
Dudaev A.B. Dokazatel'stva v proizvodstve po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh: Diss. kand. yurid. nauk. – M., 1999.
Korneev G.P. Metodologicheskie problemy ugolovno-protsessual'nogo poznaniya. Nizhniy Novgorod, 1995.
Kommentariy k KoAP RF pod obshchey redaktsiey Salishchevoy N.G. 7 izdanie.
Lazareva V.A. Dokazyvanie v ugolovnom protsesse: uchebno-praktich. Posobie. – M.: Vysshee obrazovanie, 2009.
Levchenko O.V. Obstoyatel'stva, ustanavlivaemye po ugolovnomu delu. Izvestiya Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2011. T. 2. ¹ 30-1.
Mikhaylovskaya I.B. Nastol'naya kniga sud'i po dokazyvaniyu v ugolovnom protsesse. M.: TK Velbi, Izd-vo Prospekt, 2008.
Pobedkin V.A. Ugolovno-protsessual'noe dokazyvanie. M., 2009.
Pekov A.A. Dokazatel'stva i dokazyvanie po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniya: Diss. kand. yurid. nauk.-Volgograd, 2000.
Strogovich M.S. Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa. M.: 1968. 1 T.
Teoriya dokazyvaniya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve / Belkin A.R. M.: Norma, 2005.
Treushnikov M.K. Sudebnye dokazatel'stva. – M., 1999.
Teoriya dokazatel'stv v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse // Pod. Red. Prof. N.V. Zhogina. – M., 1973.
Ugolovno-protsessual'noe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii / pod red. Lupinskoy P.A. M.: Yurist', 2004.
Sheyfer S.A. Dokazatel'stva i dokazyvanie po ugolovnym delam: problemy teorii i pravovogo regulirovaniya. – M.: Norma, 2009.

References (transliteration):
Vasil'ev F.P. Dokazyvanie po delu ob administrativnom pravonarushenii: Diss. dokt. yurid. nauk.-M., 2005.
Gorskiy G.F. Problemy dokazatel'stv v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse/ G.F. Gorskiy, L.D. Kokorev, P.S. El'kind. – Voronezh: VGU, 1978.
Davletov A.A. Osnovy ugolovno-protsessual'nogo poznaniya. Sverdlovsk, 1991.
Vladimirov L.E. Uchenie ob ugolovnykh dokazatel'stvakh. SPb., 1910.
Dudaev A.B. Dokazatel'stva v proizvodstve po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh: Diss. kand. yurid. nauk. – M., 1999.
Korneev G.P. Metodologicheskie problemy ugolovno-protsessual'nogo poznaniya. Nizhniy Novgorod, 1995.
Kommentariy k KoAP RF pod obshchey redaktsiey Salishchevoy N.G. 7 izdanie.
Lazareva V.A. Dokazyvanie v ugolovnom protsesse: uchebno-praktich. Posobie. – M.: Vysshee obrazovanie, 2009.
Levchenko O.V. Obstoyatel'stva, ustanavlivaemye po ugolovnomu delu. Izvestiya Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2011. T. 2. ¹ 30-1.
Mikhaylovskaya I.B. Nastol'naya kniga sud'i po dokazyvaniyu v ugolovnom protsesse. M.: TK Velbi, Izd-vo Prospekt, 2008.
Pobedkin V.A. Ugolovno-protsessual'noe dokazyvanie. M., 2009.
Pekov A.A. Dokazatel'stva i dokazyvanie po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniya: Diss. kand. yurid. nauk.-Volgograd, 2000.
Strogovich M.S. Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa. M.: 1968. 1 T.
Teoriya dokazyvaniya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve / Belkin A.R. M.: Norma, 2005.
Treushnikov M.K. Sudebnye dokazatel'stva. – M., 1999.
Teoriya dokazatel'stv v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse // Pod. Red. Prof. N.V. Zhogina. – M., 1973.
Ugolovno-protsessual'noe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii / pod red. Lupinskoy P.A. M.: Yurist', 2004.
Sheyfer S.A. Dokazatel'stva i dokazyvanie po ugolovnym delam: problemy teorii i pravovogo regulirovaniya. – M.: Norma, 2009.

Abstract: The article is devoted to legal and organizational problems regarding implementation of administrative provisions for the performance of state functions and services in the sphere of anti-corruption expertise of normative legal acts and their draft. Based on the analysis, the authors make propositions for the improvements into the existing procedures. It is noted in the article that currently the potential of anti-corruption expertise of normative legal acts and their drafts within the anti-corruption mechanism is obviously underestimated.

Keywords: expertise, report, expert, service, function, performance, the Ministry of Justice, corruption, requirement, factor, risk, administration.

Contact information: Kurakin, Aleksey Valentinovich, Russia, 142008, Moskovskaya obl., ul. Pikhtovaya, d. 3, m-n. Aviatsionnyi, Domodedovo.

References:
1. Buryaga V.O. Administrativnyy reglament v sfere realizatsii ispolnitel'noy vlasti v Rossiyskoy Federa-
tsii: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 2009.
2. Davydov K.V. Administrativnye reglamenty federal'nykh organov ispolnitel'noy vlasti Rossiyskoy Fe-
deratsii: voprosy teorii. — M., 2010.
3. Zaklyazminskaya A.N., Fedoseeva N.N. Administrativnye reglamenty: instrumenty sovremennogo gosudar-
stvennogo upravleniya i novyy institut administrativnogo prava // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. —
2010. — ¹ 5.
4. Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. Aktual'nye problemy administrativnogo prava. — M., 2013.
5. Kozlova L.S., Sadovskaya T.D. Administrativnye reglamenty kak pravovoe sredstvo preduprezhdeniya korrup-
tsii // Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. — 2010. — ¹ 2.
6. Korobkin M.V. Administrativnye reglamenty i problemy ikh realizatsii v sisteme MVD Rossii: dis. …
kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 2011.
7. Kurakin A.V. Administrativnoe pravo: problemy teorii i perspektivy razvitiya. — M., 2013.
8. Stakhov A.I. Razrabotka i primenenie administrativnykh reglamentov organov ispolnitel'noy vlasti // Ak-
tual'nye problemy prepodavaniya sovremennogo administrativnogo prava: teoriya, praktika, metodika. —
M., Saratov, 2010.
9. Tereshchenko L.K. Protsedury i garantii, obespechivayushchie uchastie fizicheskikh i yuridicheskikh lits v ikh otno-
sheniyakh s organami publichnoy administratsii / V knige Administrativnye protsedury i kontrol' v svete
Evropeyskogo opyta / pod red. T.Ya. Khabrievoy i Zh. Marku. — M., 2011.
10. Tarasov A.V. Administrativnye reglamenty i povedenie monitoringa ikh ispolneniya // Organizatsionno-
pravovye problemy bor'by s korruptsiey v sovremennykh usloviyakh razvitiya obshchestva. — SPb., 2010.
11. Khabrieva T.Yu. Administrativnye protsedury i administrativnye bar'ery: v poiskakh optimal'noy modeli
sootnosheniya / V knige Administrativnye protsedury i kontrol' v svete Evropeyskogo opyta / pod red. T.Ya.
Khabrievoy i Zh. Marku. — M., 2011.

References (transliteration):
1. Buryaga V.O. Administrativnyy reglament v sfere realizatsii ispolnitel'noy vlasti v Rossiyskoy Federa-
tsii: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 2009.
2. Davydov K.V. Administrativnye reglamenty federal'nykh organov ispolnitel'noy vlasti Rossiyskoy Fe-
deratsii: voprosy teorii. — M., 2010.
3. Zaklyazminskaya A.N., Fedoseeva N.N. Administrativnye reglamenty: instrumenty sovremennogo gosudar-
stvennogo upravleniya i novyy institut administrativnogo prava // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. —
2010. — ¹ 5.
4. Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. Aktual'nye problemy administrativnogo prava. — M., 2013.
5. Kozlova L.S., Sadovskaya T.D. Administrativnye reglamenty kak pravovoe sredstvo preduprezhdeniya korrup-
tsii // Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. — 2010. — ¹ 2.
6. Korobkin M.V. Administrativnye reglamenty i problemy ikh realizatsii v sisteme MVD Rossii: dis. …
kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 2011.
7. Kurakin A.V. Administrativnoe pravo: problemy teorii i perspektivy razvitiya. — M., 2013.
8. Stakhov A.I. Razrabotka i primenenie administrativnykh reglamentov organov ispolnitel'noy vlasti // Ak-
tual'nye problemy prepodavaniya sovremennogo administrativnogo prava: teoriya, praktika, metodika. —
M., Saratov, 2010.
9. Tereshchenko L.K. Protsedury i garantii, obespechivayushchie uchastie fizicheskikh i yuridicheskikh lits v ikh otno-
sheniyakh s organami publichnoy administratsii / V knige Administrativnye protsedury i kontrol' v svete
Evropeyskogo opyta / pod red. T.Ya. Khabrievoy i Zh. Marku. — M., 2011.
10. Tarasov A.V. Administrativnye reglamenty i povedenie monitoringa ikh ispolneniya // Organizatsionno-
pravovye problemy bor'by s korruptsiey v sovremennykh usloviyakh razvitiya obshchestva. — SPb., 2010.
11. Khabrieva T.Yu. Administrativnye protsedury i administrativnye bar'ery: v poiskakh optimal'noy modeli
sootnosheniya / V knige Administrativnye protsedury i kontrol' v svete Evropeyskogo opyta / pod red. T.Ya.
Khabrievoy i Zh. Marku. — M., 2011.