Abstract: The subject of this work is the study of foreign experience in the normative consolidation of the right of minors to independently make decisions on granting consent to medical intervention.
The author notes that, despite the substantial guarantees of prompt consideration of such cases provided for by the Code of Administrative Procedure of the Russian Federation, it is obvious that a delay in the implementation of medical intervention may entail serious consequences. In view of the above, the foreign experience of securing out-of-court procedures for obtaining such consent is of significant interest.
The article considers examples of regulatory regulation used in certain European (the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Serbia) and North American (Canada, the United States of America) states.The article considers examples of regulatory regulation used in certain European (the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Serbia) and North American (Canada, the United States of America) states.
During the research, the author used various methods of scientific cognition, both general scientific: analysis, synthesis, logical and structural-functional, and private scientific: formal legal, legal modeling method and comparative legal.
The novelty of the research lies in the fact that the author for the first time in Russian legal science conducted a comparative analysis of the normative consolidation of the right of minors to independently make decisions on granting consent to medical intervention.
The author comes to the conclusion that the issue of the need to expand the possibilities of minors to give appropriate consent, in relation to the Russian Federation, requires separate study and in the process of this work, foreign experience may well be taken into account.

Keywords: United States of America, Canada, Republic of Serbia, Republic of Latvia, patients' rights, saving a life, minors, medical intervention, foreign experience, administrative proceedings

References:
Code of Administrative Procedure of the Russian Federation (with amendments and additions) // RLS «Consultant Plus».
Constitution of the Russian Federation (with amendments and additions) // RLS «Consultant Plus».
Federal law of 21.11.2011 № 323-ФЗ «On the fundamentals of health protection of citizen in the Russian Federation» (with amendments and additions) // RLS «Consultant Plus».
Borisova V.F. Peculiarities of consideration by the courts of administrative cases on the protection of the interests of a minor in case of refusal of the legal representative from medical intervention necessary to save life // Laws of Russia: experience, analysis, practice. – 2017.– № 9. – С. 3-7.
Druzhinina Yu.F. Legal regime of the embryo in vitro // Journal of Russian law. – 2017. – № 12. – С. 129-140.
Chebotareva O.E., Pokatilova Yu.A. Legal regulation when carrying out medical interventions with respect to minors // Tribune of the scientist. – 2020. – № 4 – С. 156-162.
Patients' Rights Act, 2009 // h

Abstract: The subject of the article is the norms of legislation on administrative offenses: the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses, the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of 04.11.1950, regulating the principles of proceedings in cases of administrative offenses. The author carried out a comparative analysis of scientific views on the ways and forms of fixing the principles of proceedings in cases of administrative offenses, as well as the relationship of the concepts of "rule of law" and "legal principle". The methodological basis was made up of general scientific methods of cognition: analysis, synthesis, comparison and private scientific methods of cognition: formal legal, comparative legal. The author notes the special position of the principles of proceedings in cases of administrative offenses as regulatory entities and comes to the conclusion about their importance for the regulation of proceedings in cases of administrative offenses. The article substantiates the position on the need to distinguish between the legal principles of proceedings in cases of administrative offenses, enshrined in the legislation on administrative offenses and the principles of a non-legal nature existing in the science of administrative law. The opinion is expressed that the objectification of the principles of proceedings in cases of administrative offenses in the legislation on administrative offenses is carried out through textual and semantic methods of normative expression.

Keywords: ways of expressing principles, the role of principles, administrative offense, administrative responsibility, the importance of principles, signs of principles, forms of consolidation of principles, proceedings on cases, principles, administrative process

References:
Yakub M.L. O ponyatii printsipa ugolovnogo prava i ugolovnogo protsessa // Pravovedenie. 1976. № 1. S. 61.
Yakub M.L. Pro¬tsessual'naya forma v sovetskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. M.: Yurid. lit., 1981. S. 40-48.
Tyrichev I.V. Printsipy sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa. M.: VYuZI, 1983. S. 10-13.
Chechina N.A. Printsipy sovetskogo grazhdanskogo protsessual'nogo prava i ikh normativnoe zakreple¬nie // Pravovedenie. 1960. № 3. S. 78.
Tolstik V.A. Obshchepriznannye printsipy i normy mezhdunarodnogo prava v pravovoy sisteme Rossii // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2000. № 8. S. 71.
Tuzov N.A. O ponyatii, vidakh i znachenii printsipov v prave // Printsipy prava: problemy teorii i praktiki. Materialy XI nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii (18-22 aprelya 2016 goda). S. 329.
Strogovich M.S. Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa. M., 1958. S. 123.
Skurko E. V. Printsipy prava: Monografiya. – M., 2008. S. 23.
Smirnov O. V. Sootnoshenie norm i printsipov v sovetskom prave // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1977. № 2. S. 11.
Sovetskiy ugo

Abstract: This article explores the following aspects: increase in the number of audits of small and medium-sized businesses; information awareness of small and medium-sized businesses about the reform of the means of control and supervision in the Russian Federation; availability of information on mandatory requirements. The year 2019 was transitional, and its results allowed assessing the effectiveness and forecasting the prospects of the reform of control and supervision activity. The scale of the ongoing reform is enormous. However, it remains relevant whether the small and medium-sized businesses are informed about such transformations The scientific novelty consists in tracing the interrelation between dissatisfaction among the representatives of small and medium-sized businesses with the implemented control and supervisory activity and their awareness of the reform in the Russian Federation, as well as the availability of information on mandatory requirements. The conclusion is made on the need to develop and implement the project aimed at informing small and medium-sized businesses about the implementation of the reform of the means of control and supervision in the Russian Federation, as well as the conditions for their operation within the framework of the reform. The author also offers to introduce the system of common register of mandatory requirements and guidelines for their observance in accordance with the type activity on the single web portal with the option of the first-party audit.

Keywords: digitalization, single information portal, business checks, risk oriented approach, regulatory guillotine, information availability, mandatory requirements, reform of control and supervision activities, business entities, violation prevention

References:
Ob obyazatel'nykh trebovaniyakh: proekt Federal'nogo zakona. URL: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/554878127 (data obrashcheniya: 01.11.2019 g.
TPP vystupila za edinyy reestr trebovaniy k biznesu na vsekh urovnyakh vlasti // Kontrol'no-nadzornaya deyatel'nost'. URL: http://old-knd.ac.gov.ru/news/tpp-vystupila-za-edinyy-reestr-trebovaniy-k-biznesu-na-vsekh-urovnyakh-vlasti/ (data obrashcheniya: 12.10.2019 g.)
Regulyatornaya gil'otina. URL: http://knd.ac.gov.ru/ (data obrashcheniya: 01.11.2019 g.)
Vmesto proverochnykh listov predlagayut vvesti gaydlayny // Kontrol'no-nadzornaya deyatel'nost'. URL: http://old-knd.ac.gov.ru/news/vmesto-proverochnykh-listov-predlagayut-vvesti-gaydlayny-uznayte-chto-eto-i-zachem/ (data obrashcheniya: 12.10.2019 g.)
Osushchestvlenie kontrol'no-nadzornoy deyatel'nosti na territorii Volgogradskoy oblasti // Komitet ekonomicheskoy politiki i razvitiya Volgogradskoy oblasti. URL: https://economics.volgograd.ru/knd/activity/ (data obrashcheniya: 02.11.2019 g.)
Reforma kontrol'no-nadzornoy deyatel'nosti 2017-2025 gody /

Abstract: This article explores the question of sources of judicial administrative procedure law of the Russian Federation. Attention is turned to the special role of the Constitution of the Russian Federation among other sources of this branch of law, since its provisions are basic for the development of judicial administrative procedure in modern Russia.  Emphasis is made on the Chapters 2, 3 and 7 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the prescriptions of which develop in the Code of Administrative Procedure of the Russian Federation. From the administrative and procedural perspective, the author analyzes the results of the constitutional reform of 2020, which put to the forefront the question on the Constitution as primary source of the Russian public law. The main conclusion the conducted research consists in specification of thesis on the Constitution as a source of judicial administrative procedure law in the provision that the constitutional text views administrative proceedings as equal and sovereign form of legal proceedings alongside other forms, the essence of which lies in hearing administrative cases. At the same time, the Constitution employs the term “administrative procedure legislation” that implies a set of normative legal acts, which serve as the basis for the activity of judicial authorities with regards to hearing administrative cases. The author gives positive assessment to the results of the constitutional reform of 2020, although notice that certain proposals made by the representatives of public legal science were unimplemented by the legislators.

Keywords: procedural guarantees, procedural legislation, regulatory legal act, administrative code, constitutional reform, constitution, source of law, administrative process, legal proceedings, courts

References:
Kononov P.I. O konstitutsionno-pravovykh osnovakh ponimaniya sushchnosti i struktury administrativnogo protsessa, administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva i administrativno-protsessual'nogo zakonodatel'stva v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2019. № 9. S. 13-14.
Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii (prinyata vsenarodnym golosovaniem 12.12.1993 s izmeneniyami, odobrennymi v khode obshcherossiyskogo golosovaniya 01.07.2020)// Ofitsial'nyy internet-portal pravovoy informatsii http://www.pravo.gov.ru, 04.07.2020.
Kodeks administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 08.03.2015 N 21-FZ (red. ot 27.12.2019, s izm. ot 24.03.2020)// Ofitsial'nyy internet-portal pravovoy informatsii http://www.pravo.gov.ru, 09.03.2015
Starilov Yu. N. Neobkhodimy popravki v Konstitutsiyu Rossiyskoy Federatsii v svyazi s razvitiem administrativnogo i administrativnogo protsessual'nogo zakonodatel'stva // Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo. 2016. № 2 (25). S. 9-17.
Zakon RF o popravke k Konstituts

Abstract: Scientific and technological progress creates the need in a digital transformation of the society which makes lawyers think about ways of developing necessary laws for the digital environment. A new surge of interest in “artificial intelligence”, systems built on neural networks with in-depth training and blockchain technology provokes discussion about the use of intelligent agents in legal proceedings. The object of the research is the procedural relations arising between the participants in criminal proceedings taking into account technological progress. The object of the research is the procedural relations arising between the participants in criminal proceedings taking into account technological progress. The subject of the research is the laws and acts regulating the organization and activities of participants in criminal proceedings. In this article, on the basis of a systematic approach, the authors consider controversial issues related to the possible transformation of the investigator's specialty into its smart software image as an intelligent agent. The main contribution of the authors to the study of the topic is the assertion that this is an idealistic idea that will never be implemented in the activities of law enforcement and judicial authorities. The main conclusion of the study is the thesis about the need to draw attention to the substantially new training of investigative personnel and judges.

Keywords: state-like-platform, digital technologies, expert, investigator, specialist, legal proceedings, intelligent agent, Scientific Judge, blockchain, special knowledge

References:
Dolgiy put' v neizvestnost'. Nauka i tekhnologii // Ekspert, 13 noyabr' 2017. – URL: https://www.pressreader.com/russia/ekspert/ 20171113/281990377807869 .
Nesterov A. Expertocracy in Russia // The soviet and post-soviet review. – 2014.-№41.-P. 281-295.
Rey Kurtsveyl raspisal budushchee mira: prognoz do 2099 goda.-09 oktyabrya 2017. – URL: https://socialego.mediasole.ru/rey_kurcveyl_ raspisal_buduschee_mira_prognoz_do_2099_goda .
Vlasova S. V. K voprosu o prisposablivanii ugolovno-protsessual'nogo mekhanizma k tsifrovoy real'nosti // Biblioteka kriminalista.-2018.-№ 1.-S. 9-18.
Mikhail Petrov, Vasiliy Burov, Mariya Shklyaruk, Andrey Sharov. Gosudarstvo kak platforma. (Kiber)gosudarstvo dlya tsifrovoy ekonomiki. Tsifrovaya transformatsiya. – M.: Tsentr strategicheskikh razrabotok. – 2018. – URL: https://www.csr.ru/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/GOSUDARSTVO-KAK-PLATFORMA_internet.pdf
Nesterov A. V. O reordinatsii i "Otkrytom pravitel'stve" // V kn.: Regiony Evrazii: strategii i mekhanizmy modernizatsii, innovatsionno-tekhnologi

Abstract: The subject of the research is the administrative procedure for competition protection in the Balkan States and Russia. The object of the research is the activity of competition protection authorities as part of administrative procedures initiated as a result of competition protection laws being violated. In her research Milchakova analyzes the definition of 'antimonopoly process' and describes stages of proceedings for competition protection, paying special attention to comparing administrative procedures applied by competition protection authorities in the Balkan States adn Russia. In the course of her research the author of the article has used methods of analysis, synthesis and generalisation being primarily based on the comparative law method. The main conclusion of the research is that administrative procedures for competition protection in the Balkan States and Russia have both similar elements (initiation of a proceeding and particular stages of consideration of a case and decision making) and essential differences (the rights of competition protection authorities to introduce protective measures and to approve of obligation to eliminate competition violations voluntary undertaken by a defendant himself or herself, unity of administrative procedures for determination of infringement  and application of administrative sanctions. The author's special contribution to the topic is her definition of 'administrative process for competition protection' and stages of administrative process for competition protection. This contributes to the development of the theory of competition law. 

Keywords: theory of competition law, antimonopoly process concept, administrative procedures, antimonopoly process stages, competition law, competition violation, Balkan countries, competition, competition protection, antitrust process

References:
Artyushenko D.V. O ponyatii, uchastnikakh i stadiyakh antimonopol'nogo protsessa v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. // . [1]
Pisenko K.A. Nekotorye problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya antimonopol'nogo protsessa (institut preduprezhdeniya, priznaki narusheniya, sostav narusheniya antimonopol'nogo zakonodatel'stva). // (data obrashcheniya: 22.07.2018).[2]
Sumenkov S.S. Antimonopol'nyy protsess kak kvazisudebnyy administrativno-yurisdiktsionnyy protsess. // Biznes, Menedzhment i Pravo. 2014. № 1 (29). S. 114 – 116. [3]
Tsvetkov I.V. Rassmotrenie antimonopol'nykh del: ispravlenie sistemnykh nedostatkov. // Konkurentsiya i pravo. 2013. № 5. (data obrashcheniya: 22.07.2018). [4]

Abstract: The research object is the correlation between such concepts as administrative procedure and customs procedure. The concept of customs procedures is one of the key ideas of customs legislation. The author raises the problem of defining the correlation between administrative and customs procedures in the current legislation and fundamental science. To solve this problem, the author singles out the legal and doctrinal concepts of customs procedure and offers positioning these concepts within the formula: administrative procedures – administrative procedures of customs law – customs procedures. The research methodology includes general scientific methods, such as the historical and system methods and analysis and specific methods of jurisprudence, primarily the formal-logical, which allows defining legal notions and detecting their characteristics. The author formulates the provisions about the correlation between the concepts of administrative procedure and customs procedure, raises the problem of their correlation within the legislative framework and fundamental science. The scientific novelty consists in the proposed formula of correlation of these concepts. The author elaborates the classification of administrative procedures in the sphere of customs legislation, which are the varieties of administrative procedures. 

Keywords: Customs Code, licensing procedures, customs registration, administrative procedure, control and supervision procedures, customs bodies, customs case, customs regime, customs procedure, administrative procedures

References:
Novikov A.B. Administrativnyy protsess v mekhanizme tamozhennogo regulirovaniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii i Tamozhennogo soyuza evraziyskogo ekonomicheskogo soobshchestva: dis. ... dokt. yurid. nauk.-Sankt-Peterburg, 2011. – 500 s.
Tamozhennoe regulirovanie v Tamozhennom soyuze v ramkakh EvrAzES. Pod obshch. red. V.A. Shamakhova i Yu.A. Kozhankova. – M.: SoftIzdat, 2012. – S. 550.
Grechkina O.V. Tamozhennye protsedury kak raznovidnost' administrativnykh protsedur // Strategiya natsional'nogo razvitiya i zadachi rossiyskoy yuridicheskoy nauki : sb. dokladov Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, sektsiy administrativnogo prava, finansovogo prava, konkurentnogo prava, informatsionnogo prava.-Moskva : Prospekt, 2016. – S. 45-49.
Nikiforov M.V. Administrativnye protsedury: uchebnoe posobie. – N.Novgorod, 2010. – 90 s.
Matvienko G.V.Pravovye osnovy tamozhennogo protsessa / pod red. dokt. yurid. nauk, prof. S.V. Zapol'skogo. – M.: Yurlitinform, 2011. – 360 s.
Rossinskiy B.V. Administrativnoe pravo : uchebnik / B.V. Rossinskiy, Yu.N. Staril

Abstract: The research subject is the provisions of the current Administrative Procedure Rules of the Russian Federation regulating the subject of administrative procedure, administrative lawsuit, the subject composition of administrative plaintiffs and defendants, and the materials of judicial law-enforcement practice connected with the application of the provisions of Administrative Procedure Law in the acceptance of the statements of case. The author considers the specificities of public-law relations, formalized in the Administrative Procedure Rules: the open list of public-law relations and the related polysubject composition of administrative plaintiffs and defendants. The open list of public-law relations, formalized in the Administrative Procedure Rules, proves their dynamic nature. The research methodology is based on modern achievements in epistemology. The author applies theoretical and general philosophical methods (dialectics, the system method, analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, and modeling), traditional methods of jurisprudence (formal logical and interpretation methods used for the analysis of the contents of legal rules), and the comparative method used for the comparison of the categories, contained in the Administrative Procedure Rules and the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation. The author concludes that the Administrative Procedure Rules of the Russian Federation not only formalize the complex classifications of public relations and the composition of their participants, but also denote the tendency to the further differentiation and extension of public relations and their subjects. Essentially, the genesis of administrative procedure legislation development correlates in a greater degree with the scientific tendency of studying administrative lawsuits focusing on their fundamental differences from other types of lawsuits. The author reveals the tendency of correlation between the development of the legislation on administrative procedure and the scientific tendency to study administrative lawsuits focusing on their fundamental differences from other types of lawsuits. The scientific novelty consists in the consideration of the problem of a polysubject composition of the parties to administrative process according to the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Rules, and its comparison with the subject composition of the parties to administrative relations and the subjects of administrative offences.  

Keywords: Officials, Classification, polysubject character, Subject composition, Defendant, Plaintiff, Administrative lawsuit, Lawsuit, public servant, Municipal servant

References:
Kabanov P.A. Oznakomlenie s materialami uchastnikov zasedaniya Komissii po soblyudeniyu trebovaniy k sluzhebnomu povedeniyu gosudarstvennykh (munitsipal'nykh) sluzhashchikh i uregulirovaniyu konflikta interesov, postupivshimi na rassmotrenie: protsedurnye voprosy // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. 2012. № 1. C. 17-23. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_376.html
Kabanov P.A. Osnovaniya i poryadok prekrashchenie proizvodstva po materialam, postupayushchim na rassmotrenie Komissiy po soblyudeniyu trebovaniy k sluzhebnomu povedeniyu gosudarstvennykh (munitsipal'nykh) sluzhashchikh i uregulirovaniyu konflikta interesov: voprosy administrativnogo protsessual'nogo prava // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. 2013. № 5. C. 14-23. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.5.618. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_618.html
Ryazanovskiy V.A. Edinstvo protsessa. Kharbin, 1924 (pereizd. M., 1996). S. 30-31.
Toropov A.V. Administrativnyy isk kak protsessual'noe sredstvo zashchity sub'ektivnykh publichnykh prav // Ad