Articles of the rubric «Административная и муниципальная ответственность»

Dvortsov V.E. — Administrative responsibility of a cadastral engineer: the correlation of legislation and judicial practice (№12, 2016)
Korepina A.V. — Legal mechanisms of mitigation of administrative responsibility for anticompetitive agreements (№12, 2016)
Kanunnikova N.G. — Theoretical aspects of defining the set of elements of an administrative offence (№11, 2016)
Agapov A.B. — The correlation of public and civilized forms of guilt (№9, 2016)
Sergeeva E.V. — The procedure of consideration of cases on administrative offences during the departmental control in the sphere of government defence order (№9, 2016)
Kulakov N.A. — Harmonization of civil legislation and administrative liability legislation in the sphere of copyright and related rights protection (№7, 2016)
Egupov V.A. — Administrative liability for the citizens of the Russian Federation residing without a registration (№4, 2016)
Dobrobaba M.B. — Service delictness: A concept and a meaning for disciplinary policy formation within the system of public service of the Russian Federation (№4, 2016)
Trofimova G.A. — Constitutional responsibility of local government bodies and officials: problems of theory and legal regulation (№3, 2016)
Kotlyarov Yu.V. — Administrative liability in the field of technical regulation: urgent questions of law enforcement practice and its improvement (№2, 2016)
Vlasov K.A. — Competition of norms imposing administrative liability for the violation of legislation on banks and banking (№1, 2016)
Sidorov E.I. — Problems of qualification of administrative offences consisting in non-declaration or false declaration of goods within the Customs Union of the Eurasian Economic Union (№1, 2016)
Meshcheryakova T.R. — Administrative liability for the violation of citizens’ labour rights (№12, 2015)
Khasnutdinov R.R. — Optimization of the systems approach to legal liability (№10, 2015)
Bondar' E.O., Shurukhnova D.N. — Administrative liability for insurance legislation breach (№10, 2015)
Khurtin D.O. — Special reasons for exemption of administrative liability for the violation of intellectual property rights (№9, 2015)
Arkhipov S.V. — Individualization of administrative punishment of legal entities (№9, 2015)
Khurtin D.O. — Public liability for copyright infringement (№8, 2015)
Teryukov E.O. — On some peculiarities of administrative investigation of administrative offences in the sphere of town building (№8, 2015)
Admiralova I.A. — Administrative-jurisdictional policing in provision of rights and freedoms of citizens (№8, 2015)
Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V., Myshlyaev N.P. — Reasons for and conditions of administrative offences (delicts) (№7, 2015)
Dresvyannikova E.A. — Execution of decisions on administrative offences in the sphere of traffic safety (№7, 2015)
Zutikov I.A. — The protection of rights and lawful interests of lending agencies in tax process (№6, 2015)
Lapina M.A. — Optimal legal methods providing the harmonization of the system of legal sanctions of administrative and criminal legislation (№6, 2015)
Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V., Tregubova E.V., Myshlyaev N.P. — Conceptual grounds of administrative delictology (№6, 2015)
Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V., Myshlyaev N.P. — Forecasting of administrative delinquency and evaluation of its effectiveness in the police activities (№5, 2015)
Titov E.E. — Anti-competitive administrative offences: problems of value definitions use (№5, 2015)
Iliy S.K. — Administrative offences of corruption character (№5, 2015)
Sizov I.Yu. — Administrative responsibility of legal entities for the violation of migration laws (№5, 2015)
Kretov V.V., Sevryugin V.E. — On the necessity of establishing of administrative responsibility for offences in the sphere of road economy of the Russian Federation (№4, 2015)
Dresvyannikova E.A. — Correct qualification of administrative offence as a component of the principle of unavoidability of punishment (№4, 2015)
Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V., Badulin A.D., Tregubova E.V., Kareeva-Popelkovskaya K.A. — Problems of administrative responsibility application in cases of violation of legislation in the sphere of state regulation of spirituous and alcohol-containing production (№3, 2015)
Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V., Myshlyaev N.P. — On the issue of the reasons and the conditions of administrative delicts (№2, 2015)
Loginova E.S. — Proper issue of summons in the proceedings on administrative offences (№2, 2015)
Lapina M.A., Karpukhin D.V. — Construction of crimes and state coercive measures in administrative and budget legislation (№1, 2015)
Vaskevich, K. N. — Uses of Systematic Approach for Research into Legal Responsibility for tax Offences (№12, 2014)
Khramov K. N. — Certain Issues of Proof by Customs Authorities of Guilt in Administrative Cases (№11, 2014)
Konstantinova, L.V. — Administrative offences in the sphere of copyright protection within the sphere of competence of the customs bodies. (№10, 2014)
Ryzhkova, A.N. — On the issue of administrative responsibility for the illegal labor activities of a foreign citizen or a person without citizenship in the Russian Federation. (№10, 2014)
Gromova, G.A. — Some problems relating to the legal regulation of disposal of the medical waste and administrative responsibility for violations regarding disposal of medical waste. (№10, 2014)
Volchenko, T.I. — Provision of legal assistance by the customs bodies of the Russian Federation in the proceedings on administrative offences cases. (№9, 2014)
Belenko, V.V. — Influence of international law in the sphere of fighting legalization of criminal income upon the Russian system of financial control in the banking sector. (№9, 2014)
Abdulgalimov, R.Z., Suntsov, A.P. — Legal responsibility of non-governmental organizations as subjects of administration of public affairs. (№8, 2014)
Klepikov, S.N., Klepikova, O.S. — Administrative delict policy of the Russian Federation and the principles of establishing administrative responsibility. (№8, 2014)
Panshin, D.L., Dresvyannikova, E.A. — Period and procedure for the implementation of decisions imposing fines in administrative offence cases. (№8, 2014)
Babayan, K.A. — Principles of proof in administrative jurisdiction activities of the customs bodies. (№7, 2014)
Volchenko, T.I. — On improvement of administrative legal mechanism for the international cooperation of the customs bodies of the Russian Federation in the proceedings on administrative offences cases. (№7, 2014)
Vinokurov, A.Y. — On the issue of identifying the term “prosecutor” when implementing the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation. (№7, 2014)
Serov, A.S. — On the issue of legal status of a person towards whom the proceedings on administrative offence case are implemented. (№5, 2014)
Prokofiev, K.G. — Subjects of administrative responsibility for the violation of procedure for the organization and holding of gatherings, meetings, demonstrations, walks and picketing. (№5, 2014)
Izyumova, E.S. — Administrative prejudicing of criminal responsibility for the unlawful organization of gambling activities. (№4, 2014)
Konstantinova, L.V. — Improvement of the legal regulation of the proceedings on administrative offence cases within the competence of the customs bodies within the framework of the functioning Customs Union. (№3, 2014)
Serov, A.S. — Administrative procedural guarantees of participants in the proceedings in the administrative offence cases. (№3, 2014)
Akimova, N.V. — On the issue of efficiency of administrative legal means of fighting offences in the sphere of copyright (№2, 2014)
Panfilov, A.N. — Administrative responsibility for the violations in the sphere of protection of cultural heritage objects in the Russian Federation. (№12, 2013)
Kim, N.I. — On the practice of assignment of an administrative fine for the offences in the sphere of customs. (№12, 2013)
Panshin, D.L., Dresvyannikova, E.A. — Procedure and period of entry into force of the decisions on administrative offence cases. (№12, 2013)
Panshin, D.L. — Some aspects regarding improvement of law-enforcement activities of the State Traffic Safety Inspectorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation when recording administrative offences with technical means of photography, video and filming. (№11, 2013)
Panshin, D.L. — Some topical issues regarding use of disqualification from driving vehicles as a penalty for administrative offences in the sphere of road traffic (№10, 2013)
Panshin, D.L., Dresvyannikova, E.A. — Period and order of implementation of the decision on imposing a fine as an administrative punishment. (№9, 2013)
Adarchenko. E.O. — Administrative responsibility of legal entities of public law (№9, 2013)
Nekrasova, T.A. — Social and legal nature and consequences of corruption on the private legal sphere. (№9, 2013)
Shevkoplyas, N.A. — Specific features of administrative legal status of self-regulated organizations in the RussianFederation (№9, 2013)
Gadaborsheva, Z.B. — The limitations to the prosecutor supervision in the sphere of implementation of legislation on entrepreneurial activities (№8, 2013)
Panshin, D.L., Dresvyanniova, E.A. — The issues of entry into force of the decisions in the administrative cases on offences in the sphere of road traffic safety (№8, 2013)
But, S.S. — System of administrative legal means for fighting corruptions in the customs bodies of the Russian Federation (№8, 2013)
Trunov, I.L. — Problems of road traffic rules (№8, 2013)
Astanin, G.V. — Administrative responsibility of insolvency officers in legislations of the Russian Federation and Ukraine: comparative analysis. (№7, 2013)
Agapov, A.B. — Public coercion or social sanitation… (№7, 2013)
Astanin, V.V. — Fighting corruption: perspective approaches to prevention and compensation of harm. (№7, 2013)
Panshin, D.L. — Some aspects of improvement of administrative legislation in the sphere of guarantees of road traffic security: the order of movement on pedestrian crosswalks. (№7, 2013)

Contents details

Reference:

Dvortsov V.E.. Administrative responsibility of a cadastral engineer: the correlation of legislation and judicial practice // Administrative and municipal law. – 2016. – № 12. – P. 995-1001. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2016.12.21306.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2016.12.21306

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The research object is the phenomenon of administrative responsibility of a cadastral engineer for plotting of the knowingly false information on a delimitation or technical plan, or its inclusion in the inspection report, land delimitation project or a survey map, or for the forgery of records, which these documents are based on, on condition that these actions don’t contain a criminal offence. This phenomenon is rather disputable in legal science and practice. The research subject is administrative responsibility of a cadastral engineer for the abovementioned deeds and the judicial practice of its implementation. The research methodology is based on the analytical, comparative and system methods of scientific cognition. The study is based on the fundamental statutory acts of contemporary Russia and judicial practice. This research is the first and the only complex study of the responsibility of a cadastral engineer, considering the recent changes of administrative legislation and judicial practice. The topicality of the problem is determined by the fact that the lawsuits against the offences of a cadastral engineer face difficulties in the judicial practice due to the blanket character of the part 4, article 14.45. of the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation, providing administrative responsibility for such actions. The author assesses the effectiveness of the established administrative responsibility of cadastral engineers, analyzes the mistakes of its enforcement and offers the ways to manage the situation.

Keywords: Real estate, Knowingly false information, Cadastral engineer, Cadastral activities, Judicial practice, Administrative Offences Code , Administrative Responsibility, Forgery of documents, Punishment, Damage

References:
Gradostroitel'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 29.12.2004 g. № 190-FZ (red. ot 03.07.2016 g.) (s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 01.09.2016 g.) / Konsul'tant Plyus;
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30.12.2001 g. № 195-FZ (red. ot 22.11.2016 g.) / Konsul'tant Plyus;
Pis'mo Minekonomrazvitiya Rossii ot 16.07.2014 g. № OG-D23-5504 «O zapolnenii razdela «Zaklyuchenie kadastrovogo inzhenera» / Konsul'tant Plyus;
Postanovlenie Abinskogo rayonnogo suda Krasnodarskogo kraya ot 29.07.2016 g. Delo № 5-236/2016 / Konsul'tant Plyus;
Postanovlenie Verkhovnogo suda Respubliki Tatarstan ot 16.02.2016 g. Delo № 4a-2124m/2016 / Konsul'tant Plyus;
Postanovlenie Vladimirskogo oblastnogo suda ot 30.06.2016 g. Delo № 4a-161/2016 / Konsul'tant Plyus;
Postanovleniya Krasnodarskogo kraevogo suda ot 27.05.2016 g. Delo № 4a-656/2016 / Konsul'tant Plyus;
Postanovlenie Krasnodarskogo kraevogo suda ot 30.05.2016 g. Delo № 4a-655/2016 / Konsul'tant Plyus;
Postanovlenie Kurganskogo oblastnogo suda ot 12.10.2015 g. Delo № 4a-293/2015 / Konsul'tant Plyus;
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 24.03.2005 g. № 5 (red. ot 19.12.2013 g.) «O nekotorykh voprosakh, voznikayushchikh u sudov pri primenenii Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh» / Konsul'tant Plyus;
Postanovlenie Primorskogo kraevogo suda ot 31.10.2014 g. Delo № 4a-854 / Konsul'tant Plyus;
Prikaz Minekonomrazvitiya Rossii ot 24.11.2008 g. № 412 (red. ot 12.11.2015 g.) «Ob utverzhdenii formy mezhevogo plana i trebovaniy k ego podgotovke, primernoy formy izveshcheniya o provedenii sobraniya o soglasovanii mestopolozheniya granits zemel'nykh uchastkov» (zaregistrirovano v Minyuste Rossii 15.12.2008 g. № 12857) / Konsul'tant Plyus;
Prikaz Minekonomrazvitiya Rossii ot 01.09.2010 g. № 403 (red. ot 04.12.2015 g.) «Ob utverzhdenii formy tekhnicheskogo plana zdaniya i trebovaniy k ego podgotovke» (zaregistrirovano v Minyuste Rossii 14.10.2010 g. № 18723) / Konsul'tant Plyus;
Reshenie Alekseevskogo rayonnogo suda Respubliki Tatarstan ot 07.05.2014 g. № 12-56/2014 / Sudebnye i normativnye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii // http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/9MWe6ricOP5d/?regular-txt=%D1%87.+4+%D1%81%D1%82.+14.35+%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%90%D0%9F+%D0%A0%D0%A4+%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B7%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%87%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BD%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C®ular-case_doc=®ular-doc_type=®ular-date_from=®ular-date_to=®ular-workflow_stage=®ular-area=®ular-court=®ular-judge=&_=1480875756440&snippet_pos=884#snippet (data obrashcheniya 01.12.2016 g.);
Reshenie Kaluzhskogo rayonnogo suda Kaluzhskoy oblasti ot 11.02.2016 g. Delo № 12-204/2016 / Sudebnye i normativnye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii / http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/zovFpeW1M6xe/?regular-txt=%D1%87.+4+%D1%81%D1%82.+14.35+%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%90%D0%9F+%D0%A0%D0%A4+%D0%BD%D0%B5+%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%87%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B5%D0%BD+%D1%83%D1%89%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B1®ular-case_doc=®ular-doc_type=®ular-date_from=®ular-date_to=®ular-workflow_stage=®ular-area=®ular-court=®ular-judge=&_=1480873378831&snippet_pos=192#snippet (data obrashcheniya 10.09.2016 g.);
Reshenie Leninskogo rayonnogo suda g. Ekaterinburga Sverdlovskoy oblasti ot 09.06.2016 g. № 12-379/2016 g. / Sudebnye i normativnye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii / http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/AtiCAnQJCVd8/?page=2®ular-doc_type=®ular-court=®ular-date_from=®ular-case_doc=®ular-workflow_stage=®ular-date_to=®ular-area=®ular-txt=%D1%87.+4+%D1%81%D1%82.+14.35+%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%90%D0%9F+%D0%A0%D0%A4&_=1480862863165®ular-judge=&snippet_pos=1824#snippet (data obrashcheniya 05.10.2016 g.);
Reshenie Oktyabr'skogo rayonnogo suda g. Samary ot 31.05.2016 g. Delo № 12-452/2016 / Sudebnye i normativnye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii / http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/V59etzBuV7VQ/?regular-txt=%D1%87.+4+%D1%81%D1%82.+14.35+%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%90%D0%9F+%D0%A0%D0%A4+%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%8F+%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%B8%D0%B1%D0%BA%D0%B0®ular-case_doc=®ular-doc_type=®ular-date_from=®ular-date_to=®ular-workflow_stage=®ular-area=®ular-court=®ular-judge=&_=1480871111336&snippet_pos=158#snippet (data obrashcheniya 03.09.2016 g.);
Reshenie Oktyabr'skogo rayonnogo suda g. Ufy Respubliki Bashkortostan ot 15.11.2016 g. Delo № 12-1160/2016 / Sudebnye i normativnye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii // http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/gD4T2zPP84QX/?regular-txt=%D1%87.+4+%D1%81%D1%82.+14.35+%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%90%D0%9F+%D0%A0%D0%A4®ular-case_doc=®ular-doc_type=®ular-date_from=®ular-date_to=®ular-workflow_stage=®ular-area=®ular-court=®ular-judge=&_=1480862790384&snippet_pos=152#snippet (data obrashcheniya 04.12.2016 g.);
Reshenie Pestrechinskogo rayonnogo suda Respubliki Tatarstan ot 23.09.2016 g. Delo № 12-215/206 / Sudebnye i normativnye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii // http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/LCEwqFrn8Yoj/?regular-txt=%D1%87.+4+%D1%81%D1%82.+14.35+%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%90%D0%9F+%D0%A0%D0%A4®ular-case_doc=®ular-doc_type=®ular-date_from=®ular-date_to=®ular-workflow_stage=®ular-area=®ular-court=®ular-judge=&_=1480862790384&snippet_pos=20#snippet (data obrashcheniya 30.11.2016 g.);
Reshenie Proletarskogo rayonnogo suda Rostovskoy oblasti ot 19.05.2016 g. Delo № 12-18/2016 / Sudebnye i normativnye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii / http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/C6wedSd51CUW/?regular-txt=%D1%87.+4+%D1%81%D1%82.+14.35+%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%90%D0%9F+%D0%A0%D0%A4+%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%8F+%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%B8%D0%B1%D0%BA%D0%B0®ular-case_doc=®ular-doc_type=®ular-date_from=®ular-date_to=®ular-workflow_stage=®ular-area=®ular-court=®ular-judge=&_=1480871111336&snippet_pos=1864#snippet (data obrashcheniya 10.09.2016 g.);
Reshenie Sosnovskogo rayonnogo suda Chelyabinskoy oblasti ot 12.10.2015 g. Delo № 12-185/2015 / Sudebnye i normativnye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii // http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/gD4T2zPP84QX/?regular-txt=%D1%87.+4+%D1%81%D1%82.+14.35+%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%90%D0%9F+%D0%A0%D0%A4®ular-case_doc=®ular-doc_type=®ular-date_from=®ular-date_to=®ular-workflow_stage=®ular-area=®ular-court=®ular-judge=&_=1480862790384&snippet_pos=152#snippet (data obrashcheniya 06.08.2016 g.);
Reshenie Ul'yanovskogo rayonnogo suda g. Ul'yanovska ot 18.05.2016 g. № 12-290/2016 / Sudebnye i normativnye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii / http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/cqIf2UoVQLNX/?page=3®ular-doc_type=®ular-court=®ular-date_from=®ular-case_doc=®ular-workflow_stage=®ular-date_to=®ular-area=®ular-txt=%D1%87.+4+%D1%81%D1%82.+14.35+%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%90%D0%9F+%D0%A0%D0%A4&_=1480862921430®ular-judge=&snippet_pos=68#snippet (data obrashcheniya 29.11.2016 g.);
Reshenie Tsentral'nogo rayonnogo suda g. Omska ot 03.02.2016 g. Delo № 12-27/2016 / Sudebnye i normativnye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/OaJUCQjwNCH6/?page=4®ular-doc_type=®ular-court=®ular-date_from=®ular-case_doc=®ular-workflow_stage=®ular-date_to=®ular-area=®ular-txt=%D1%87.+4+%D1%81%D1%82.+14.35+%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%90%D0%9F+%D0%A0%D0%A4&_=1480862992101®ular-judge=&snippet_pos=142#snippet (data obrashcheniya 10.09.2016 g.);
Reshenie Chernoyarskogo rayonnogo suda Astrakhanskoy oblasti ot 18.08.2016 g. Delo № 12-44/2-16 / Sudebnye i normativnye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii // http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/OoHwRdCyyqJE/?regular-txt=%D1%87.+4+%D1%81%D1%82.+14.35+%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%90%D0%9F+%D0%A0%D0%A4+%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%8F+%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%B8%D0%B1%D0%BA%D0%B0®ular-case_doc=®ular-doc_type=®ular-date_from=®ular-date_to=®ular-workflow_stage=®ular-area=®ular-court=®ular-judge=&_=1480871111336&snippet_pos=2272#snippet (data obrashcheniya 30.11.2016 g.);
Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13.06.1996 g. № 63-FZ (red. ot 22.11.2016 g.) / Konsul'tant plyus;
Federal'nyy zakon ot 24.07.2002 g. № 101-FZ «(red. ot 03.07.2016 g.) «Ob oborote zemel' sel'skokhozyaystvennogo naznacheniya» s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 15.07.2016 g.) / Konsul'tant Plyus;
Federal'nyy zakon ot 24.07.2007 g. № 221-FZ (red. ot 03.07.2016 g.) «O gosudarstvennom kadastre nedvizhimosti» (s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 01.12.2016 g.) / Konsul'tant Plyus.

References (transliteration):
Gradostroitel'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 29.12.2004 g. № 190-FZ (red. ot 03.07.2016 g.) (s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 01.09.2016 g.) / Konsul'tant Plyus;
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30.12.2001 g. № 195-FZ (red. ot 22.11.2016 g.) / Konsul'tant Plyus;
Pis'mo Minekonomrazvitiya Rossii ot 16.07.2014 g. № OG-D23-5504 «O zapolnenii razdela «Zaklyuchenie kadastrovogo inzhenera» / Konsul'tant Plyus;
Postanovlenie Abinskogo rayonnogo suda Krasnodarskogo kraya ot 29.07.2016 g. Delo № 5-236/2016 / Konsul'tant Plyus;
Postanovlenie Verkhovnogo suda Respubliki Tatarstan ot 16.02.2016 g. Delo № 4a-2124m/2016 / Konsul'tant Plyus;
Postanovlenie Vladimirskogo oblastnogo suda ot 30.06.2016 g. Delo № 4a-161/2016 / Konsul'tant Plyus;
Postanovleniya Krasnodarskogo kraevogo suda ot 27.05.2016 g. Delo № 4a-656/2016 / Konsul'tant Plyus;
Postanovlenie Krasnodarskogo kraevogo suda ot 30.05.2016 g. Delo № 4a-655/2016 / Konsul'tant Plyus;
Postanovlenie Kurganskogo oblastnogo suda ot 12.10.2015 g. Delo № 4a-293/2015 / Konsul'tant Plyus;
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 24.03.2005 g. № 5 (red. ot 19.12.2013 g.) «O nekotorykh voprosakh, voznikayushchikh u sudov pri primenenii Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh» / Konsul'tant Plyus;
Postanovlenie Primorskogo kraevogo suda ot 31.10.2014 g. Delo № 4a-854 / Konsul'tant Plyus;
Prikaz Minekonomrazvitiya Rossii ot 24.11.2008 g. № 412 (red. ot 12.11.2015 g.) «Ob utverzhdenii formy mezhevogo plana i trebovaniy k ego podgotovke, primernoy formy izveshcheniya o provedenii sobraniya o soglasovanii mestopolozheniya granits zemel'nykh uchastkov» (zaregistrirovano v Minyuste Rossii 15.12.2008 g. № 12857) / Konsul'tant Plyus;
Prikaz Minekonomrazvitiya Rossii ot 01.09.2010 g. № 403 (red. ot 04.12.2015 g.) «Ob utverzhdenii formy tekhnicheskogo plana zdaniya i trebovaniy k ego podgotovke» (zaregistrirovano v Minyuste Rossii 14.10.2010 g. № 18723) / Konsul'tant Plyus;
Reshenie Alekseevskogo rayonnogo suda Respubliki Tatarstan ot 07.05.2014 g. № 12-56/2014 / Sudebnye i normativnye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii // http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/9MWe6ricOP5d/?regular-txt=%D1%87.+4+%D1%81%D1%82.+14.35+%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%90%D0%9F+%D0%A0%D0%A4+%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B7%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%87%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BD%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C®ular-case_doc=®ular-doc_type=®ular-date_from=®ular-date_to=®ular-workflow_stage=®ular-area=®ular-court=®ular-judge=&_=1480875756440&snippet_pos=884#snippet (data obrashcheniya 01.12.2016 g.);
Reshenie Kaluzhskogo rayonnogo suda Kaluzhskoy oblasti ot 11.02.2016 g. Delo № 12-204/2016 / Sudebnye i normativnye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii / http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/zovFpeW1M6xe/?regular-txt=%D1%87.+4+%D1%81%D1%82.+14.35+%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%90%D0%9F+%D0%A0%D0%A4+%D0%BD%D0%B5+%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%87%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B5%D0%BD+%D1%83%D1%89%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B1®ular-case_doc=®ular-doc_type=®ular-date_from=®ular-date_to=®ular-workflow_stage=®ular-area=®ular-court=®ular-judge=&_=1480873378831&snippet_pos=192#snippet (data obrashcheniya 10.09.2016 g.);
Reshenie Leninskogo rayonnogo suda g. Ekaterinburga Sverdlovskoy oblasti ot 09.06.2016 g. № 12-379/2016 g. / Sudebnye i normativnye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii / http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/AtiCAnQJCVd8/?page=2®ular-doc_type=®ular-court=®ular-date_from=®ular-case_doc=®ular-workflow_stage=®ular-date_to=®ular-area=®ular-txt=%D1%87.+4+%D1%81%D1%82.+14.35+%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%90%D0%9F+%D0%A0%D0%A4&_=1480862863165®ular-judge=&snippet_pos=1824#snippet (data obrashcheniya 05.10.2016 g.);
Reshenie Oktyabr'skogo rayonnogo suda g. Samary ot 31.05.2016 g. Delo № 12-452/2016 / Sudebnye i normativnye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii / http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/V59etzBuV7VQ/?regular-txt=%D1%87.+4+%D1%81%D1%82.+14.35+%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%90%D0%9F+%D0%A0%D0%A4+%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%8F+%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%B8%D0%B1%D0%BA%D0%B0®ular-case_doc=®ular-doc_type=®ular-date_from=®ular-date_to=®ular-workflow_stage=®ular-area=®ular-court=®ular-judge=&_=1480871111336&snippet_pos=158#snippet (data obrashcheniya 03.09.2016 g.);
Reshenie Oktyabr'skogo rayonnogo suda g. Ufy Respubliki Bashkortostan ot 15.11.2016 g. Delo № 12-1160/2016 / Sudebnye i normativnye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii // http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/gD4T2zPP84QX/?regular-txt=%D1%87.+4+%D1%81%D1%82.+14.35+%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%90%D0%9F+%D0%A0%D0%A4®ular-case_doc=®ular-doc_type=®ular-date_from=®ular-date_to=®ular-workflow_stage=®ular-area=®ular-court=®ular-judge=&_=1480862790384&snippet_pos=152#snippet (data obrashcheniya 04.12.2016 g.);
Reshenie Pestrechinskogo rayonnogo suda Respubliki Tatarstan ot 23.09.2016 g. Delo № 12-215/206 / Sudebnye i normativnye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii // http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/LCEwqFrn8Yoj/?regular-txt=%D1%87.+4+%D1%81%D1%82.+14.35+%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%90%D0%9F+%D0%A0%D0%A4®ular-case_doc=®ular-doc_type=®ular-date_from=®ular-date_to=®ular-workflow_stage=®ular-area=®ular-court=®ular-judge=&_=1480862790384&snippet_pos=20#snippet (data obrashcheniya 30.11.2016 g.);
Reshenie Proletarskogo rayonnogo suda Rostovskoy oblasti ot 19.05.2016 g. Delo № 12-18/2016 / Sudebnye i normativnye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii / http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/C6wedSd51CUW/?regular-txt=%D1%87.+4+%D1%81%D1%82.+14.35+%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%90%D0%9F+%D0%A0%D0%A4+%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%8F+%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%B8%D0%B1%D0%BA%D0%B0®ular-case_doc=®ular-doc_type=®ular-date_from=®ular-date_to=®ular-workflow_stage=®ular-area=®ular-court=®ular-judge=&_=1480871111336&snippet_pos=1864#snippet (data obrashcheniya 10.09.2016 g.);
Reshenie Sosnovskogo rayonnogo suda Chelyabinskoy oblasti ot 12.10.2015 g. Delo № 12-185/2015 / Sudebnye i normativnye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii // http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/gD4T2zPP84QX/?regular-txt=%D1%87.+4+%D1%81%D1%82.+14.35+%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%90%D0%9F+%D0%A0%D0%A4®ular-case_doc=®ular-doc_type=®ular-date_from=®ular-date_to=®ular-workflow_stage=®ular-area=®ular-court=®ular-judge=&_=1480862790384&snippet_pos=152#snippet (data obrashcheniya 06.08.2016 g.);
Reshenie Ul'yanovskogo rayonnogo suda g. Ul'yanovska ot 18.05.2016 g. № 12-290/2016 / Sudebnye i normativnye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii / http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/cqIf2UoVQLNX/?page=3®ular-doc_type=®ular-court=®ular-date_from=®ular-case_doc=®ular-workflow_stage=®ular-date_to=®ular-area=®ular-txt=%D1%87.+4+%D1%81%D1%82.+14.35+%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%90%D0%9F+%D0%A0%D0%A4&_=1480862921430®ular-judge=&snippet_pos=68#snippet (data obrashcheniya 29.11.2016 g.);
Reshenie Tsentral'nogo rayonnogo suda g. Omska ot 03.02.2016 g. Delo № 12-27/2016 / Sudebnye i normativnye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/OaJUCQjwNCH6/?page=4®ular-doc_type=®ular-court=®ular-date_from=®ular-case_doc=®ular-workflow_stage=®ular-date_to=®ular-area=®ular-txt=%D1%87.+4+%D1%81%D1%82.+14.35+%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%90%D0%9F+%D0%A0%D0%A4&_=1480862992101®ular-judge=&snippet_pos=142#snippet (data obrashcheniya 10.09.2016 g.);
Reshenie Chernoyarskogo rayonnogo suda Astrakhanskoy oblasti ot 18.08.2016 g. Delo № 12-44/2-16 / Sudebnye i normativnye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii // http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/OoHwRdCyyqJE/?regular-txt=%D1%87.+4+%D1%81%D1%82.+14.35+%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%90%D0%9F+%D0%A0%D0%A4+%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%8F+%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%B8%D0%B1%D0%BA%D0%B0®ular-case_doc=®ular-doc_type=®ular-date_from=®ular-date_to=®ular-workflow_stage=®ular-area=®ular-court=®ular-judge=&_=1480871111336&snippet_pos=2272#snippet (data obrashcheniya 30.11.2016 g.);
Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13.06.1996 g. № 63-FZ (red. ot 22.11.2016 g.) / Konsul'tant plyus;
Federal'nyy zakon ot 24.07.2002 g. № 101-FZ «(red. ot 03.07.2016 g.) «Ob oborote zemel' sel'skokhozyaystvennogo naznacheniya» s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 15.07.2016 g.) / Konsul'tant Plyus;
Federal'nyy zakon ot 24.07.2007 g. № 221-FZ (red. ot 03.07.2016 g.) «O gosudarstvennom kadastre nedvizhimosti» (s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 01.12.2016 g.) / Konsul'tant Plyus.

Reference:

Korepina A.V.. Legal mechanisms of mitigation of administrative responsibility for anticompetitive agreements // Administrative and municipal law. – 2016. – № 12. – P. 987-994. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2016.12.20066.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2016.12.20066

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The general tendency of the punitive policy formation in administrative responsibility legislation has influenced all the spheres of public management. The most serious administrative sanctions are established in the antimonopoly sphere, particularly for anticompetitive agreements. The Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation doesn’t differentiate them according to business entities, and it has a negative impact on the development of small and medium entrepreneurship in the Russian Federation. The author analyzes the introduced general and specific legal mechanisms of humanization of administrative responsibility and the problems of their practical realization. The research subject includes administrative norms regulating social relations in the sphere of imposition and implementation of administrative responsibility for anticompetitive agreements and realization of legal mechanisms of mitigation of legal responsibility and release from responsibility. The research object includes the article 14.32 of the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation and the articles, establishing general and special legal instruments of mitigation of responsibility and release from responsibility for anticompetitive agreements, the judicial practice in the sphere of application of the Code’s provisions, related to the imposition and mitigation of administrative responsibility for anticompetitive agreements. The article is based on general scientific (analysis, synthesis, the system-structural, formal-logical and other methods) and special scientific methods of cognition (logical and legal, comparative-legal the method of legal hermeneutics (interpretation) and descriptive method). The author comes to the following conclusions: - The influence of the general tendency of administrative-punitive state policy is observed in the sphere of imposition of administrative responsibility for anticompetitive agreements; - The administrative sanctions for anticompetitive agreements, provided by the article 14.32. of the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation, are very serious; the Administrative Offences Code doesn’t differentiate them according to business entities and it has a negative impact on the development of small and medium entrepreneurship in the Russian Federation; - The legislation provides for general and specific mechanisms, aimed at the mitigation of administrative responsibility and release from it for anticompetitive agreements, but the practical implementation of some of them is quite problematic; - The introduction of more flexible criteria, helping take into account the property and financial status of various business entities, brought to administrative responsibility, seems to be reasonable; - In order to improve the legislation in this sphere and provide the uniformity of application of juridical terminology, the author proposes to insert the term “cartel” not only in the comment, but also in the disposition of the article 14.32. of the Administrative Offences Code; to differentiate the volume of sanctions depending on the category of business entities.

Keywords: differentiation of sanctions, legal mechanisms, administrative offence, humanization, administrative responsibility, anticompetitive agreement, cartel, judicial practice, competition, economic security

References:
Administrativnoe pravo. Obshchaya chast': Uchebnik / Pod red. d-ra yurid. nauk, prof. S. A. Starostina. – M.: INFRA-M, 2010. – 506 s. S. 299 – 302;
Bondar' E. O. Pravovye posledstviya primeneniya normy stat'i 2.9. Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh pri privlechenii k administrativnoy otvetstvennosti yuridicheskikh lits // Strategiya natsional'nogo razvitiya i zadachi rossiyskoy yuridicheskoy nauki: sb. dokladov Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, sektsiy administrativnogo prava, finansovogo prava, konkurentnogo prava, informatsionnogo prava (Moskva, 24 noyabrya – 3 dekabrya 2015 g.) – Moskva: Prospekt, 2016. – 464 s. S. 207 – 213.
Darovskikh S. M. K voprosu o maloznachitel'nosti administrativnogo pravonarusheniya // Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo, 2012, Vypusk № 7 (266). S. 96-98;
Igor' Artem'ev: zashchishchaya konkurentsiyu, my zashchishchaem osnovy gosudarstvennogo stroya. [Elektronnyy resurs] URL: http://fas.gov.ru/press-center/news/detail.html?id=45093 (data obrashcheniya 10.08.2016)..
Internet-interv'yu s Andreem Tenishevym 04.05.2016. [Elektronnyy resurs] URL: http://fas.gov.ru/documents/documentdetails.html?id=14611 (data obrashcheniya 10.08.2016).
Kodeks Respubliki Kazakhstan ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 5 iyulya 2014 goda № 235-V (s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami po sostoyaniyu na 28.04.2016 g.). [Elektronnyy resurs] URL: http://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=31577399#pos=1;-307 (data obrashcheniya .10.08.2016).
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30.12.2001 № 195-FZ (red. ot 02.06.2016) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 07.01.2002, № 1 (ch. 1), st. 1.
Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii (prinyata vsenarodnym golosovaniem 12.12.1993) (s uchetom popravok, vnesennykh Zakonami RF o popravkakh k Konstitutsii RF ot 30.12.2008 № 6-FKZ, ot 30.12.2008 № 7-FKZ, ot 05.02.2014 № 2-FKZ, ot 21.07.2014 № 11-FKZ) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 04.08.2014, № 31, st. 4398.
Korepina A. V. Problemy pravoprimenitel'noy praktiki privlecheniya k administrativnoy otvetstvennosti za pravonarusheniya v sfere predprinimatel'skoy deyatel'nosti // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. Tambov: Gramota, 2015, № 11, Ch. 1. S. 82-84.
Pis'mo FAS Rossii ot 21.03.2012 № IA/8457 «O praktike primeneniya stat'i 2.9 KoAP RF» // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
Pis'mo FAS Rossii ot 08.07.2010 № IA/21482 «O primenenii metodicheskikh rekomendatsiy po raschetu oborotnogo shtrafa» // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
Pirogov V. Yu. Kriterii priznaniya administrativnogo pravonarusheniya maloznachitel'nym // Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie i pravovye issledovaniya, 2013, Vypusk № 3. S. 67-74;
Postanovlenie Devyatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 29.03.2016 № 09AP-8675/2016 po delu № A40-210342/2015 «V udovletvorenii trebovaniya v chasti priznaniya nezakonnym i otmene postanovleniya o privlechenii k otvetstvennosti po ch. 1 st. 14.32. KoAP RF za zaklyuchenie ogranichivayushchego konkurentsiyu soglasheniya, osushchestvlenie ogranichivayushchikh konkurentsiyu soglasovannykh deystviy, koordinatsiyu ekonomicheskoy deyatel'nosti otkazano v svyazi s nalichiem v deystviyakh obshchestva sostava vmenyaemogo administrativnogo pravonarusheniya» // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 17.01.2013 № 1-P «Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozheniya chasti 5 stat'i 19.8. Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v svyazi s zhaloboy obshchestva s ogranichennoy otvetstvennost'yu "Maslyanskiy khlebopriemnyy punkt"» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 28.01.2013, № 4, st. 304.
Postanovlenie ot 16 avgusta 2013 goda. Delo № A71-3272/2013. Semnadtsatyy arbitrazhnyy apellyatsionnyy sud. [Elektronnyy resurs] URL: http://sudrf.kodeks.ru/rospravo/document/498912692 (data obrashcheniya 10.08.2016).
Postanovlenie Plenuma VAS RF ot 02.06.2004 № 10 «O nekotorykh voprosakh, voznikshikh v sudebnoy praktike pri rassmotrenii del ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh» // Vestnik VAS RF, № 8, 2004.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 24.03.2005 № 5 «O nekotorykh voprosakh, voznikayushchikh u sudov pri primenenii Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh» // Rossiyskaya gazeta, № 80, 19.04.2005.
Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 20.07.2009, № 29, st. 3597.
Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 05.01.2015, № 1 (chast' I), st. 68.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13.06.1996 № 63-FZ (red. ot 06.07.2016) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 17.06.1996, № 25, st. 2954.
Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 31.12.2015 № 683 «O Strategii natsional'noy bezopasnosti Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 04.01.2016, № 1 (chast' II), st. 212.
Ul'yanov A. Popkorn, sakhar i taksi: kak FAS boretsya s malym biznesom. [Elektronnyy resurs] URL: http://www.forbes.ru/mneniya-column/konkurentsiya/270499-popkorn-sakhar-i-taksi-kak-fas-boretsya-s-malym-biznesom (data obrashcheniya 10.08.2016).
Federal'nyy zakon ot 06.12.2011 № 404-FZ (red. ot 23.07.2013) «O vnesenii izmeneniy v Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 12.12.2011, № 50, st. 7346.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 06.12.2011 № 401-FZ (red. ot 05.10.2015) «O vnesenii izmeneniy v Federal'nyy zakon "O zashchite konkurentsii" i otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 12.12.2011, № 50, st. 7343.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 05.10.2015 № 275-FZ «O vnesenii izmeneniy v Federal'nyy zakon "O zashchite konkurentsii" i otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 12.10.2015, N 41 (chast' I), st. 5629.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 26.07.2006 № 135-FZ (red. ot 03.07.2016) «O zashchite konkurentsii» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 31.07.2006, № 31 (1 ch.), st. 3434.

References (transliteration):
Administrativnoe pravo. Obshchaya chast': Uchebnik / Pod red. d-ra yurid. nauk, prof. S. A. Starostina. – M.: INFRA-M, 2010. – 506 s. S. 299 – 302;
Bondar' E. O. Pravovye posledstviya primeneniya normy stat'i 2.9. Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh pri privlechenii k administrativnoy otvetstvennosti yuridicheskikh lits // Strategiya natsional'nogo razvitiya i zadachi rossiyskoy yuridicheskoy nauki: sb. dokladov Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, sektsiy administrativnogo prava, finansovogo prava, konkurentnogo prava, informatsionnogo prava (Moskva, 24 noyabrya – 3 dekabrya 2015 g.) – Moskva: Prospekt, 2016. – 464 s. S. 207 – 213.
Darovskikh S. M. K voprosu o maloznachitel'nosti administrativnogo pravonarusheniya // Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo, 2012, Vypusk № 7 (266). S. 96-98;
Igor' Artem'ev: zashchishchaya konkurentsiyu, my zashchishchaem osnovy gosudarstvennogo stroya. [Elektronnyy resurs] URL: http://fas.gov.ru/press-center/news/detail.html?id=45093 (data obrashcheniya 10.08.2016)..
Internet-interv'yu s Andreem Tenishevym 04.05.2016. [Elektronnyy resurs] URL: http://fas.gov.ru/documents/documentdetails.html?id=14611 (data obrashcheniya 10.08.2016).
Kodeks Respubliki Kazakhstan ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 5 iyulya 2014 goda № 235-V (s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami po sostoyaniyu na 28.04.2016 g.). [Elektronnyy resurs] URL: http://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=31577399#pos=1;-307 (data obrashcheniya .10.08.2016).
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30.12.2001 № 195-FZ (red. ot 02.06.2016) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 07.01.2002, № 1 (ch. 1), st. 1.
Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii (prinyata vsenarodnym golosovaniem 12.12.1993) (s uchetom popravok, vnesennykh Zakonami RF o popravkakh k Konstitutsii RF ot 30.12.2008 № 6-FKZ, ot 30.12.2008 № 7-FKZ, ot 05.02.2014 № 2-FKZ, ot 21.07.2014 № 11-FKZ) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 04.08.2014, № 31, st. 4398.
Korepina A. V. Problemy pravoprimenitel'noy praktiki privlecheniya k administrativnoy otvetstvennosti za pravonarusheniya v sfere predprinimatel'skoy deyatel'nosti // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. Tambov: Gramota, 2015, № 11, Ch. 1. S. 82-84.
Pis'mo FAS Rossii ot 21.03.2012 № IA/8457 «O praktike primeneniya stat'i 2.9 KoAP RF» // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
Pis'mo FAS Rossii ot 08.07.2010 № IA/21482 «O primenenii metodicheskikh rekomendatsiy po raschetu oborotnogo shtrafa» // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
Pirogov V. Yu. Kriterii priznaniya administrativnogo pravonarusheniya maloznachitel'nym // Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie i pravovye issledovaniya, 2013, Vypusk № 3. S. 67-74;
Postanovlenie Devyatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 29.03.2016 № 09AP-8675/2016 po delu № A40-210342/2015 «V udovletvorenii trebovaniya v chasti priznaniya nezakonnym i otmene postanovleniya o privlechenii k otvetstvennosti po ch. 1 st. 14.32. KoAP RF za zaklyuchenie ogranichivayushchego konkurentsiyu soglasheniya, osushchestvlenie ogranichivayushchikh konkurentsiyu soglasovannykh deystviy, koordinatsiyu ekonomicheskoy deyatel'nosti otkazano v svyazi s nalichiem v deystviyakh obshchestva sostava vmenyaemogo administrativnogo pravonarusheniya» // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 17.01.2013 № 1-P «Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozheniya chasti 5 stat'i 19.8. Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v svyazi s zhaloboy obshchestva s ogranichennoy otvetstvennost'yu "Maslyanskiy khlebopriemnyy punkt"» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 28.01.2013, № 4, st. 304.
Postanovlenie ot 16 avgusta 2013 goda. Delo № A71-3272/2013. Semnadtsatyy arbitrazhnyy apellyatsionnyy sud. [Elektronnyy resurs] URL: http://sudrf.kodeks.ru/rospravo/document/498912692 (data obrashcheniya 10.08.2016).
Postanovlenie Plenuma VAS RF ot 02.06.2004 № 10 «O nekotorykh voprosakh, voznikshikh v sudebnoy praktike pri rassmotrenii del ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh» // Vestnik VAS RF, № 8, 2004.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 24.03.2005 № 5 «O nekotorykh voprosakh, voznikayushchikh u sudov pri primenenii Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh» // Rossiyskaya gazeta, № 80, 19.04.2005.
Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 20.07.2009, № 29, st. 3597.
Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 05.01.2015, № 1 (chast' I), st. 68.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13.06.1996 № 63-FZ (red. ot 06.07.2016) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 17.06.1996, № 25, st. 2954.
Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 31.12.2015 № 683 «O Strategii natsional'noy bezopasnosti Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 04.01.2016, № 1 (chast' II), st. 212.
Ul'yanov A. Popkorn, sakhar i taksi: kak FAS boretsya s malym biznesom. [Elektronnyy resurs] URL: http://www.forbes.ru/mneniya-column/konkurentsiya/270499-popkorn-sakhar-i-taksi-kak-fas-boretsya-s-malym-biznesom (data obrashcheniya 10.08.2016).
Federal'nyy zakon ot 06.12.2011 № 404-FZ (red. ot 23.07.2013) «O vnesenii izmeneniy v Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 12.12.2011, № 50, st. 7346.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 06.12.2011 № 401-FZ (red. ot 05.10.2015) «O vnesenii izmeneniy v Federal'nyy zakon "O zashchite konkurentsii" i otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 12.12.2011, № 50, st. 7343.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 05.10.2015 № 275-FZ «O vnesenii izmeneniy v Federal'nyy zakon "O zashchite konkurentsii" i otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 12.10.2015, N 41 (chast' I), st. 5629.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 26.07.2006 № 135-FZ (red. ot 03.07.2016) «O zashchite konkurentsii» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 31.07.2006, № 31 (1 ch.), st. 3434.

Reference:

Kanunnikova N.G.. Theoretical aspects of defining the set of elements of an administrative offence // Administrative and municipal law. – 2016. – № 11. – P. 910-912. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2016.11.20940.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2016.11.20940

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The article considers some issues of theoretical views on certain definitions of the set of elements of an administrative offence; demonstrates the characteristic of various approaches of scholars, dealing with the problems of administrative tort law. The topicality of this issue is conditioned by the importance of this legal institution, since it promotes the correct qualification of the deed and the effective application of administrative punishment, improves the legal culture of the population. The research object is social relations, regulating the administrative responsibility institution; the research subject is the theoretical approaches to the definition of the set of elements of an administrative offence as a basis for administrative responsibility. Based on the provisions of the general dialectical method, and using the system, structural-functional, analytical and comparative methods, the author offers her own interpretation of the definition of the set of elements of an administrative offence. The author suggests to understand the set of elements of an administrative offence as the set of legal features, which help characterize the deed, the circumstances, the damage, the person who had committed the offence, and the relation of this person to the committed deed.

Keywords: damage, administrative punishment, administrative jurisdiction , legislation, features, legal analysis, notion, composition , administrative law, administrative offence

References:
Bocharov S.N., Zubach A.V., Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V., Sal'nikov M.G., Tyurin V.A. Administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya: uch. posobie. M., 2005. S. 12.
Dmitriev Yu.A., Evteeva A.A., Petrov S.M. Administrativnoe pravo: uchebnik dlya yuridicheskikh vuzov. M., 2005. S. 288.
Khatova Zh.M. Ponyatie sostava administrativnogo pravonarusheniya nuzhdaetsya v zakonodatel'nom zakreplenii // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2007. № 1. S. 24.
Administrativnoe pravo: Uchebnik / Pod red. L.L. Popova. M., 2005. S. 43.
Alekhin A.P., Karmolitskiy A.A., Kozlov Yu.M. Administrativnoe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii. M., 1996. S. 275.
Bocharov S.N. i dr. Administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya: Uch. posobie. M., 2005. S. 12.
Kanunnikova N.G. Aktual'nye problemy bor'by s administrativnymi pravonarusheniyami // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2013. № 4. S. 5-11.
Kanunnikova N.G. K voprosu zarozhdeniya instituta administrativnykh pravonarusheniy (prostupkov) // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2012. № 6. S. 22-24.
Kanunnikova N.G. Administrativnoe pravo. Obshchaya chast'. Uchebnik. Nal'chik, 2010. S. 380-413.
Averina E.A. Administrativnoe pravo Rossii v voprosakh i otvetakh: uch. posobie. M., 2005. S. 136.
Studenikina M.S. Sostav administrativnogo prostupka. M., 1968. S. 72.
Bakhrakh D.N. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' grazhdan v SSSR. Sverdlovsk, 1989. S. 42.

References (transliteration):
Bocharov S.N., Zubach A.V., Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V., Sal'nikov M.G., Tyurin V.A. Administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya: uch. posobie. M., 2005. S. 12.
Dmitriev Yu.A., Evteeva A.A., Petrov S.M. Administrativnoe pravo: uchebnik dlya yuridicheskikh vuzov. M., 2005. S. 288.
Khatova Zh.M. Ponyatie sostava administrativnogo pravonarusheniya nuzhdaetsya v zakonodatel'nom zakreplenii // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2007. № 1. S. 24.
Administrativnoe pravo: Uchebnik / Pod red. L.L. Popova. M., 2005. S. 43.
Alekhin A.P., Karmolitskiy A.A., Kozlov Yu.M. Administrativnoe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii. M., 1996. S. 275.
Bocharov S.N. i dr. Administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya: Uch. posobie. M., 2005. S. 12.
Kanunnikova N.G. Aktual'nye problemy bor'by s administrativnymi pravonarusheniyami // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2013. № 4. S. 5-11.
Kanunnikova N.G. K voprosu zarozhdeniya instituta administrativnykh pravonarusheniy (prostupkov) // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2012. № 6. S. 22-24.
Kanunnikova N.G. Administrativnoe pravo. Obshchaya chast'. Uchebnik. Nal'chik, 2010. S. 380-413.
Averina E.A. Administrativnoe pravo Rossii v voprosakh i otvetakh: uch. posobie. M., 2005. S. 136.
Studenikina M.S. Sostav administrativnogo prostupka. M., 1968. S. 72.
Bakhrakh D.N. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' grazhdan v SSSR. Sverdlovsk, 1989. S. 42.

Reference:

Agapov A.B.. The correlation of public and civilized forms of guilt // Administrative and municipal law. – 2016. – № 9. – P. 791-798. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2016.9.20074.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2016.9.20074

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The article substantiates the specific rules of guilt qualification in the cases of infliction of harm according to civilized and administrative legislation. Unlike public delictual relations, the qualification of a guilty civilized offence doesn’t comply with the assumption of innocence attributes, and especially with the imposition of the burden of evidence on public officials. The qualification of a guilty act of a person in relation to civilized delicts and administrative offences is connected with detecting the psychological criteria of guilt in the form of a guilty intent or negligence, but, unlike the administrative responsibility cases, there are no definitions of a guilty intent or negligence. The author concludes that the qualification of a negligent act with the signs of “gross carelessness” in relation to civilized responsibility is widely spread. It is noticeable in comparison with administrative responsibility which doesn’t individuate the forms of negligence, unlike criminal responsibility characterized by the formalization of attributes of negligence. The author applies general philosophical and theoretical methods (dialectics, the system method, analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, observation and modeling), traditional legal methods (formal logical) and the methods of special sociological research. The author proves that the presumption of objective imputation of delict is a specific phenomenon typical only for civilized responsibility. Besides, the author substantiates the conclusion about the identity of subjective criteria of corporate guilt, established by the Civil Code and the Administrative Offences Code, and the legally important circumstances of force majeure, extreme necessity and necessary defence. A civil sanction, unlike a public one, is not a punishment and doesn’t have preventive purposes.

Keywords: responsibility, punishment, sanction, private, public, correlation, offence, delict, right, law

References:
Kurakin A.V. Aktual'nye problemy administrativnogo prava i protsessa. – M., 2014. – S. 12.
Agapov A.B. K voprosu o publichnom prinuzhdenie v rossiyskom prave // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 7. - C. 58 - 87. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.7.9922. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_9922.html
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. K voprosu ob osnovanii administrativnoy otvetstvennosti v rossiyskom prave // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 10. - C. 75 - 88. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.10.10153. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_10153.html
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V., Myshlyaev N.P. Prichiny administrativnykh pravonarusheniy // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2015. - 3. - C. 44 - 62. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2015.3.15876. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_15876.html
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V., Myshlyaev N.P. Lichnost' sub'ekta administrativnogo pravonarusheniya // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2015. - 1. - C. 62 - 80. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2015.1.15849. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_15849.html

References (transliteration):
Kurakin A.V. Aktual'nye problemy administrativnogo prava i protsessa. – M., 2014. – S. 12.
Agapov A.B. K voprosu o publichnom prinuzhdenie v rossiyskom prave // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 7. - C. 58 - 87. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.7.9922. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_9922.html
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. K voprosu ob osnovanii administrativnoy otvetstvennosti v rossiyskom prave // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 10. - C. 75 - 88. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.10.10153. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_10153.html
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V., Myshlyaev N.P. Prichiny administrativnykh pravonarusheniy // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2015. - 3. - C. 44 - 62. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2015.3.15876. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_15876.html
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V., Myshlyaev N.P. Lichnost' sub'ekta administrativnogo pravonarusheniya // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2015. - 1. - C. 62 - 80. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2015.1.15849. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_15849.html

Reference:

Sergeeva E.V.. The procedure of consideration of cases on administrative offences during the departmental control in the sphere of government defence order // Administrative and municipal law. – 2016. – № 9. – P. 784-790. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2016.9.18621.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2016.9.18621

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The research subject is the procedure of consideration of cases on administrative offences during the departmental control in the sphere of government defence order (GDO) and the issues of administrative responsibility. The administrative responsibility in the sphere of GDO consists in the imposition of administrative punishment by judges and specially authorized federal executives on private individuals and corporate entities for administrative offences in the sphere of GDO provided by the Administrative Offences Code. The Federal Law of 05.04.2013 No 44 “On the contract based system of state procurement of goods, services and works”, article 3, defines the main concepts used in the sphere of government defence order. Particularly, the concept of “supervisory body in the sphere of state procurement” means the federal executive body, municipal local authority, local authority of a city district, authorized to carry out supervision over procurement, and the federal executive body authorized to carry out supervisory functions in the sphere of government defence order and state procurement of goods, services and works which are not connected with the government defence order and the information about which is classified”. The supervision function consists in the constant regular supervision of special government bodies over the work of bodies and persons, not subordinate to them, for the purpose of detecting legality infringements. The subject of regulation of departmental control is the inspection of observance of the legislation in the sphere of GDO by public procurement authorities, leading executives, executives, federal executive bodies and other entities and officials endowed with such powers. In case of detection of the signs of violation of the Federal Law “On government defence order” No 275, the supervisory authority initiates and considers the cases on the infringement of the legislation in the sphere of GDO. The proceedings are initiated according to the standard procedure established by the legislation of the Russian Federation. The research methodology is based on dialectical materialism and the set of general and special research methods, including the formal-logical, system, the method of comparative jurisprudence, etc. The article considers the issues of administrative regulation of the procedure of consideration of administrative cases in the sphere of government defence order. The author analyzes the peculiarities of consideration of such cases and the issues of departmental control. The author offers the definition of administrative responsibility in the sphere of government defence order as the imposition of administrative punishment by judges and specially authorized federal executives on private individuals and corporate entities for administrative offences in the sphere of GDO provided by the Administrative Offences Code, the concepts of departmental control and supervisory body.

Keywords: initiation of proceedings, procurement, term, direction, supervision, commission, executive bodies, municipal needs, administrative responsibility, Administrative Offences Code

References:
Vasil'ev R.I. Gosudarstvennyy kontrol' kak funktsiya upravleniya. // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2011. - 2. - C. 65 - 71.
Yavorskaya M.V. Sil'nye i slabye storony rossiyskoy sistemy gosudarstvennykh zakupok i ee znachenie dlya zashchity interesov otechestvennogo biznesa i proizvodstva // Finansy i upravlenie. - 2013. - 3. - C. 37 - 52. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7802.2013.3.9592. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/flc/article_9592.html
Slepenkova L.V. Administrativnye pravonarusheniya v oblasti gosudarstvennogo oboronnogo zakaza / L.V. Slepenkova // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2009. № 6. S. 76.
Nikitina E.V. Zakupki v sfere gosudarstvennogo oboronnogo zakaza /http://www.otc.ru
Serov A.S. Administrativno-protsessual'naya pravosub'ektnost' uchastnikov proizvodstva po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2014. № 2. S. 158-164.
Krivonosov A.N. K voprosu o ponyatii administrativnogo pravonarusheniya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2010. № 4. S. 66-69.
Bashlakov I.N. Antimonopol'nyy kontrol' v sfere gosudarstvennogo oboronnogo zakaza//http://dfnc.ru/oboronzakaz
Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 08.09.2014 N 613 "O nekotorykh voprosakh gosudarstvennogo upravleniya i kontrolya v sfere gosudarstvennogo oboronnogo zakaza vooruzheniya, voennoy, spetsial'noy tekhniki i material'nykh sredstv" // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 05.04.2013 N 44-FZ "O kontraktnoy sisteme v sfere zakupok tovarov, rabot, uslug dlya obespecheniya gosudarstvennykh i munitsipal'nykh nuzhd".
Federal'nyy zakon ot 29.12.2012 N 275-FZ (red. ot 13.07.2015) "O gosudarstvennom oboronnom zakaze" st. 15.18. N 275-FZ//SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 26.12.2008 N 294-FZ "O zashchite prav yuridicheskikh lits i individual'nykh predprinimateley pri osushchestvlenii gosudarstvennogo kontrolya (nadzora) i munitsipal'nogo kontrolya" // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2008. N 52 (ch. I). St. 6249.

References (transliteration):
Vasil'ev R.I. Gosudarstvennyy kontrol' kak funktsiya upravleniya. // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2011. - 2. - C. 65 - 71.
Yavorskaya M.V. Sil'nye i slabye storony rossiyskoy sistemy gosudarstvennykh zakupok i ee znachenie dlya zashchity interesov otechestvennogo biznesa i proizvodstva // Finansy i upravlenie. - 2013. - 3. - C. 37 - 52. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7802.2013.3.9592. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/flc/article_9592.html
Slepenkova L.V. Administrativnye pravonarusheniya v oblasti gosudarstvennogo oboronnogo zakaza / L.V. Slepenkova // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2009. № 6. S. 76.
Nikitina E.V. Zakupki v sfere gosudarstvennogo oboronnogo zakaza /http://www.otc.ru
Serov A.S. Administrativno-protsessual'naya pravosub'ektnost' uchastnikov proizvodstva po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2014. № 2. S. 158-164.
Krivonosov A.N. K voprosu o ponyatii administrativnogo pravonarusheniya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2010. № 4. S. 66-69.
Bashlakov I.N. Antimonopol'nyy kontrol' v sfere gosudarstvennogo oboronnogo zakaza//http://dfnc.ru/oboronzakaz
Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 08.09.2014 N 613 "O nekotorykh voprosakh gosudarstvennogo upravleniya i kontrolya v sfere gosudarstvennogo oboronnogo zakaza vooruzheniya, voennoy, spetsial'noy tekhniki i material'nykh sredstv" // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 05.04.2013 N 44-FZ "O kontraktnoy sisteme v sfere zakupok tovarov, rabot, uslug dlya obespecheniya gosudarstvennykh i munitsipal'nykh nuzhd".
Federal'nyy zakon ot 29.12.2012 N 275-FZ (red. ot 13.07.2015) "O gosudarstvennom oboronnom zakaze" st. 15.18. N 275-FZ//SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 26.12.2008 N 294-FZ "O zashchite prav yuridicheskikh lits i individual'nykh predprinimateley pri osushchestvlenii gosudarstvennogo kontrolya (nadzora) i munitsipal'nogo kontrolya" // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2008. N 52 (ch. I). St. 6249.

Reference:

Kulakov N.A.. Harmonization of civil legislation and administrative liability legislation in the sphere of copyright and related rights protection // Administrative and municipal law. – 2016. – № 7. – P. 576-579. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2016.7.18070.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2016.7.18070

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The paper is devoted to the study of the problems of administrative liability in the sphere of copyright and related rights protection, whose legal grounds are characterized by a certain internal inconsistence and need correction. The research subject is the set of general statutory instruments regulating the issues of copyright and related rights protection in the Russian Federation. The purpose of the research is the comparative-legal analysis of the provision of civil and administrative legislation in the mentioned sphere, and the development of the proposals about harmonization of the mentioned provisions. The research methodology is based on the dialectical method of scientific cognition, the formal-logical, comparative-legal, system and functional and other specific research methods. The author concludes that the provision about administrative liability in the sphere of copyright and related rights protection needs harmonization with civil legislation. The author formulates the proposals about introducing changes in administrative liability legislation which, in the author’s opinion, will promote improvement of the effectiveness of copyright and related rights administrative protection.

Keywords: sound record, copies of works, information, related rights , copyright, exclusive rights, intellectual property rights, intellectual property, administrative liability, administrative coercion

References:
Markova O.V. Perspektivy pravovoy zashchity intellektual'noy sobstvennosti i sposoby ukrepleniya ustoychivogo elementa sistemy pravovoy zashchity intellektual'noy sobstvennosti // Politika i Obshchestvo. 2012. № 6. C. 101-106.
Plesovskikh V.D. Tendentsii razvitiya federal'nogo administrativno-deliktnogo prava i zakonodatel'stva // Pravo i politika. 2012. № 12. C. 1990-1994.
Kulakov N.A. Administrativno-pravovaya okhrana prav na selektsionnye dostizheniya // Pravo i gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika. 2011. № 5. S. 98-101.
Kulakov N.A. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' kak sposob zashchity prav na topologii integral'nykh mikroskhem. Materialy ezhegodnoy vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii (Sorokinskie chteniya). 20 marta 2015 g. S. 71.
Gavrilov E.P., Gorodov O.A. i dr. Kommentariy k Grazhdanskomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii (postateynyy). Ch. 4. M.: TK Velbi; izd-vo «Prospekt», 2012. S. 120.
Makovskiy A.L. Kommentariy k chasti chetvertoy Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii / Pod red. A.L. Makovskogo; vstup. sl. V.F. Yakovleva; Issl. tsentr chastn. prava. M., 2008. S. 275.
Voynikanis E.A. Kodifikatsiya zakonodatel'stva i ee osobennosti v sfere intellektual'nykh prav: teoretiko-pravovye aspekty // Pravo i politika. 2014. № 11. C. 1643-1646. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.11.13319.
Bliznets I.A. Pravo intellektual'noy sobstvennosti: teoretiko-pravovoe issledovanie: Avtoreferat diss. … dokt. yurid. nauk. M., 2003. S. 11.
Akimova N.V. K voprosu ob effektivnosti administrativno-pravovykh mer protivodeystviya pravonarusheniyam v oblasti intellektual'noy sobstvennosti // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2014. № 2. S. 119 – 127.
Kleymenova M.O. K voprosu ob administrativno-pravovom regulirovanii zashchity isklyuchitel'nogo prava na sredstva individualizatsii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2014. № 11. S. 122-125.
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30 dekabrya 2001 g. № 195-FZ (s izm. i dop.) // SZ RF. 2002. № 1 (ch. 1). St. 1.
Murav'ev S.V. Konstitutsiya intellektual'noy sobstvennosti // EZh-Yurist. 2006. № 37. S. 56.
Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii (chast' chetvertaya) ot 18 fevralya 2006 g. № 230-F3 (s izm. i dop.) // SZ RF. 2006. № 52. St. 5496.

References (transliteration):
Markova O.V. Perspektivy pravovoy zashchity intellektual'noy sobstvennosti i sposoby ukrepleniya ustoychivogo elementa sistemy pravovoy zashchity intellektual'noy sobstvennosti // Politika i Obshchestvo. 2012. № 6. C. 101-106.
Plesovskikh V.D. Tendentsii razvitiya federal'nogo administrativno-deliktnogo prava i zakonodatel'stva // Pravo i politika. 2012. № 12. C. 1990-1994.
Kulakov N.A. Administrativno-pravovaya okhrana prav na selektsionnye dostizheniya // Pravo i gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika. 2011. № 5. S. 98-101.
Kulakov N.A. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' kak sposob zashchity prav na topologii integral'nykh mikroskhem. Materialy ezhegodnoy vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii (Sorokinskie chteniya). 20 marta 2015 g. S. 71.
Gavrilov E.P., Gorodov O.A. i dr. Kommentariy k Grazhdanskomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii (postateynyy). Ch. 4. M.: TK Velbi; izd-vo «Prospekt», 2012. S. 120.
Makovskiy A.L. Kommentariy k chasti chetvertoy Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii / Pod red. A.L. Makovskogo; vstup. sl. V.F. Yakovleva; Issl. tsentr chastn. prava. M., 2008. S. 275.
Voynikanis E.A. Kodifikatsiya zakonodatel'stva i ee osobennosti v sfere intellektual'nykh prav: teoretiko-pravovye aspekty // Pravo i politika. 2014. № 11. C. 1643-1646. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.11.13319.
Bliznets I.A. Pravo intellektual'noy sobstvennosti: teoretiko-pravovoe issledovanie: Avtoreferat diss. … dokt. yurid. nauk. M., 2003. S. 11.
Akimova N.V. K voprosu ob effektivnosti administrativno-pravovykh mer protivodeystviya pravonarusheniyam v oblasti intellektual'noy sobstvennosti // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2014. № 2. S. 119 – 127.
Kleymenova M.O. K voprosu ob administrativno-pravovom regulirovanii zashchity isklyuchitel'nogo prava na sredstva individualizatsii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2014. № 11. S. 122-125.
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30 dekabrya 2001 g. № 195-FZ (s izm. i dop.) // SZ RF. 2002. № 1 (ch. 1). St. 1.
Murav'ev S.V. Konstitutsiya intellektual'noy sobstvennosti // EZh-Yurist. 2006. № 37. S. 56.
Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii (chast' chetvertaya) ot 18 fevralya 2006 g. № 230-F3 (s izm. i dop.) // SZ RF. 2006. № 52. St. 5496.

Reference:

Egupov V.A.. Administrative liability for the citizens of the Russian Federation residing without a registration // Administrative and municipal law. – 2016. – № 4. – P. 305-310. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2016.4.16990.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2016.4.16990

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The research object is the range of social relations in the sphere of residence registration of the citizens of the Russian Federation and administrative liability for the absence of the residence registration in the living accommodation. The research subject covers the provisions of the article 19.15.1 of the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation, and the provisions of the Constitution of the Russian Federation and the Federal Law of 25 June 1993 № 5242-1 (version of 31 December 2014) “On the right of citizens of the Russian Federation to the freedom of movement and residence within the territory of the Russian Federation”. The leading research method is the dialectical approach together with the critical vision of the gaps and the drawbacks of the legislation in the sphere of registration, and the liability for its violation. The author offers to limit administrative liability for residing without a registration, and to impose it only on the potentially dangerous citizens of the Russian Federation. The residence registration and the liability for its absence should be abolished for law-abiding citizens. The necessity to have a residence registration for law-abiding citizens hampers the implementation of the right to the freedom of movement and residence. The residence registration should be obligatory for the citizens having a criminal record for intentional crimes, having asocial way of life, registered in narcological or psychoneurologic dispensaries, or other socially dangerous persons.

Keywords: registration, registration, living accomodation, residence, administrative offence, administrative liability, in-migration, object, objective side, subjective side

References:
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30.12.2001 N 195-FZ (red. ot 04.11.2014). // Rossiyskaya gazeta, N 256 ot 31.12.2001.
Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Prinyata na vsenarodnom golosovanii 12 dekabrya 1993 g. (s popravkami ot 30 dekabrya 2008 g.) // Rossiyskaya gazeta. – 21.01.2009.
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V., Sosnovskaya Yu.N., Zubach A.V. Pasportno-registratsionnaya sistema i administrativno-pravovye sredstva ee obespecheniya: Uchebnoe posobie. – M.: Moskovskiy universitet MVD Rossii, 2005.
Sherstoboev O.N. Registratsiya grazhdan po mestu prebyvaniya i mestu zhitel'stva: problemy teorii i praktiki. // Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2010. № 2.
Shkolyarenko E.A. Status bezdomnykh i lits bez opredelennogo mesta zhitel'stva: neobkhodimo chetkoe pravovoe regulirovanie. // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2004. №5.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 21.12.2013 g. № 376-FZ «O vnesenii izmeneniy v otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii». // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 23.12.2013, N 51, st. 6696.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 25 iyunya 1993 g. №5242-1 (red. ot 31.12.2014 g.) «O prave grazhdan Rossiyskoy Federatsii na svobodu peredvizheniya, vybor mesta prebyvaniya i zhitel'stva v predelakh Rossiyskoy Federatsii». // Rossiyskaya gazeta, N 152, 10.08.1993.
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. Aktual'nye problemy nauki administrativnogo prava / Pod redaktsiey N.A. Ovchinnikova: Nauchnye shkoly Vserossiyskogo instituta povysheniya kvalifikatsii sotrudnikov MVD Rossii. T.2. – M.: Maroseyka, 2011.
Mirolyubova S.Yu. Pravo na svobodu peredvizheniya v predelakh Rossiyskoy Federatsii: konstitutsionno-pravovoy aspekt. Monografiya. Izdatel'stvo Statut, 2013.

References (transliteration):
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30.12.2001 N 195-FZ (red. ot 04.11.2014). // Rossiyskaya gazeta, N 256 ot 31.12.2001.
Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Prinyata na vsenarodnom golosovanii 12 dekabrya 1993 g. (s popravkami ot 30 dekabrya 2008 g.) // Rossiyskaya gazeta. – 21.01.2009.
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V., Sosnovskaya Yu.N., Zubach A.V. Pasportno-registratsionnaya sistema i administrativno-pravovye sredstva ee obespecheniya: Uchebnoe posobie. – M.: Moskovskiy universitet MVD Rossii, 2005.
Sherstoboev O.N. Registratsiya grazhdan po mestu prebyvaniya i mestu zhitel'stva: problemy teorii i praktiki. // Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2010. № 2.
Shkolyarenko E.A. Status bezdomnykh i lits bez opredelennogo mesta zhitel'stva: neobkhodimo chetkoe pravovoe regulirovanie. // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2004. №5.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 21.12.2013 g. № 376-FZ «O vnesenii izmeneniy v otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii». // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 23.12.2013, N 51, st. 6696.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 25 iyunya 1993 g. №5242-1 (red. ot 31.12.2014 g.) «O prave grazhdan Rossiyskoy Federatsii na svobodu peredvizheniya, vybor mesta prebyvaniya i zhitel'stva v predelakh Rossiyskoy Federatsii». // Rossiyskaya gazeta, N 152, 10.08.1993.
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. Aktual'nye problemy nauki administrativnogo prava / Pod redaktsiey N.A. Ovchinnikova: Nauchnye shkoly Vserossiyskogo instituta povysheniya kvalifikatsii sotrudnikov MVD Rossii. T.2. – M.: Maroseyka, 2011.
Mirolyubova S.Yu. Pravo na svobodu peredvizheniya v predelakh Rossiyskoy Federatsii: konstitutsionno-pravovoy aspekt. Monografiya. Izdatel'stvo Statut, 2013.

Reference:

Dobrobaba M.B.. Service delictness: A concept and a meaning for disciplinary policy formation within the system of public service of the Russian Federation // Administrative and municipal law. – 2016. – № 4. – P. 299-304. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2016.4.16843.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2016.4.16843

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The research object is the institution of disciplinary liability of public officers of the Russian Federation and the related category “service delictness”, which, in spite of its theoretical and practical importance for the public service system improvement, hasn’t been sufficiently justified and studied within the framework of the legal science. The research subject is legal regulation of the system of public administration and public service in the Russian Federation, and the statistical data serving as a basis for the conclusion about the growth of service delictness within the system of public service, thus conditioning the need for the use of a system and a balanced approach when developing and implementing the concept of disciplinary policy in public administration, which is the direction of public service development. The research methodology is based on the dialectical principles of the system approach to the analysis of processes and phenomena and the universal linkage and development. On the base of the study the author substantiates the necessity to form the concept of a common disciplinary policy within the public service system of the Russian Federation, defines the system approaches to its implementation, reveals the essence of the scientific category “service delictness”, establishes the link between service delictness and disciplinary policy within the public service system of the Russian Federation.

Keywords: public administration, public service, disciplinary liability, legal policy, disciplinary policy, administrative delictness, service delictness, service and disciplinary delicts, disciplinary sanction, service legal relations

References:
Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 7 maya 2012 goda № 601 «Ob osnovnykh napravleniyakh sovershenstvovaniya sistemy gosudarstvennogo upravleniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 2012. № 19. St. 2338.
Proekt Ukaza Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii «O federal'noy programme «Razvitie gosudarstvennoy sluzhby Rossiyskoy Federatsii (2015 – 2018 gody)» i plane meropriyatiy po razvitiyu sistemy gosudarstvennoy sluzhby Rossiyskoy Federatsii do 2018 goda» (po sostoyaniyu na 16.07.2014) // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Rossiyskaya pravovaya politika: kurs lektsiy / pod red. N.I. Matuzova, A.V. Mal'ko. M.: Norma, 2003. S. 78.
Mal'ko A.V. Distsiplinarnaya politika kak osobaya raznovidnost' pravovoy politiki // Pravovaya politika i pravovaya zhizn'. 2001. № 2. S. 15–26.
Sm., naprimer: Genzyuk E.E. Administrativnaya deliktologiya: avtoref. dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 2001
Deryuga A.N. Ob'ekt i predmet administrativnoy deliktologii // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2011. № 1. S. 97–100
Zhigarev B.C. Administrativnaya deliktnost' nesovershennoletnikh: ponyatie, vidy i ee profilaktika. M., VSh MVD RF. 1992
Nikulin M.I. Kontseptual'nye osnovy razvitiya nauki administrativnoy deliktologii: dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 2005 i dr.
Genzyuk E.E. Administrativnaya deliktologiya: dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 2001. S. 92.
Bakhrakh D.N. Administrativnoe pravo Rossii: uchebnik dlya vuzov. M.: NORMA, 2002. S. 367.
Shergin A.P. Administrativnaya politika: problemy formirovaniya i realizatsii // Aktual'nye problemy administrativno-deliktnogo zakonodatel'stva: Sb. nauchnykh trudov / pod red. V.G. Tataryana. M., 2002. S. 94.
Kizilov V.V. Institut administrativnoy otvetstvennosti gosudarstvennykh grazhdanskikh sluzhashchikh Rossii. Saratov: izd-vo Sarat. un-ta, 2012.
Dobrobaba M.B. Problema sistematizatsii sluzhebno-distsiplinarnykh deliktov // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2013. № 7. S. 48-50.
Denisenko V.V. Sistemnyy analiz administrativno-deliktnykh otnosheniy: monografiya / pod. red. prof. V.P. Sal'nikova. SPb.: Sankt-Peterburgskiy universitet MVD RF, 2001. S. 28.
Dobrobaba M.B. Ponyatie i osobennosti sluzhebno-deliktnykh pravootnosheniy // Sovremennoe pravo. 2013. № 8. S. 16-20.
Desyatik M.S. Administrativnaya deliktnost' v oblasti ispolnitel'nogo proizvodstva // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2011. № 6. S. 56–57.
Byalt V.S. Distsiplinarnaya otvetstvennost' sotrudnikov organov vnutrennikh del: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2011. S. 2.
Pis'mo Ministerstva oborony Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 10 sentyabrya 2015 g. № 173/24363 na № 1812/0617.
Federal'naya tamozhennaya sluzhba «O khode realizatsii mer po protivodeystviyu korruptsii v Federal'noy tamozhennoy sluzhbe» [Elektronnyy resurs] URL / http://www.customs.ru index.php? option=com_content&view=article&id=17264&Itemid=2392.
Grishkovets A.A. Pravovoe regulirovanie gosudarstvennoy grazhdanskoy sluzhby Rossiyskoy Federatsii: uchebnyy kurs. M.: Izdatel'stvo «Delo i Servis», 2003. S. 172.
Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 2008. № 20. St. 2383; 2015. № 42. St. 5804.
Grishkovets A.A. Gosudarstvennaya grazhdanskaya sluzhba: uchebnyy kurs / A.A. Grishkovets, Yu.V. Rostovtseva, S.V. Fomina; otv. red. d-r yurid. nauk, prof. N.Yu. Khamaneva. M.: Delo i Servis, 2014. S. 491.
Knyaginina O.N. Distsiplinarnaya otvetstvennost' gosudarstvennykh grazhdanskikh sluzhashchikh Rossiyskoy Federatsii: problemy administrativnoy teorii i praktiki: avtoref. dis. …kand. yurid. nauk. M.. 2010. S. 21.
Pravitel'stvo Ul'yanovskoy oblasti [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://ulgov.ru/pravitel'stvo/ggs/
Ofitsial'naya statisticheskaya informatsiya Upravleniya statistiki truda Federal'noy sluzhby gosudarstvennoy statistiki: Pis'mo ot 22.10.2015 № 1463/05

References (transliteration):
Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 7 maya 2012 goda № 601 «Ob osnovnykh napravleniyakh sovershenstvovaniya sistemy gosudarstvennogo upravleniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 2012. № 19. St. 2338.
Proekt Ukaza Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii «O federal'noy programme «Razvitie gosudarstvennoy sluzhby Rossiyskoy Federatsii (2015 – 2018 gody)» i plane meropriyatiy po razvitiyu sistemy gosudarstvennoy sluzhby Rossiyskoy Federatsii do 2018 goda» (po sostoyaniyu na 16.07.2014) // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Rossiyskaya pravovaya politika: kurs lektsiy / pod red. N.I. Matuzova, A.V. Mal'ko. M.: Norma, 2003. S. 78.
Mal'ko A.V. Distsiplinarnaya politika kak osobaya raznovidnost' pravovoy politiki // Pravovaya politika i pravovaya zhizn'. 2001. № 2. S. 15–26.
Sm., naprimer: Genzyuk E.E. Administrativnaya deliktologiya: avtoref. dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 2001
Deryuga A.N. Ob'ekt i predmet administrativnoy deliktologii // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2011. № 1. S. 97–100
Zhigarev B.C. Administrativnaya deliktnost' nesovershennoletnikh: ponyatie, vidy i ee profilaktika. M., VSh MVD RF. 1992
Nikulin M.I. Kontseptual'nye osnovy razvitiya nauki administrativnoy deliktologii: dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 2005 i dr.
Genzyuk E.E. Administrativnaya deliktologiya: dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 2001. S. 92.
Bakhrakh D.N. Administrativnoe pravo Rossii: uchebnik dlya vuzov. M.: NORMA, 2002. S. 367.
Shergin A.P. Administrativnaya politika: problemy formirovaniya i realizatsii // Aktual'nye problemy administrativno-deliktnogo zakonodatel'stva: Sb. nauchnykh trudov / pod red. V.G. Tataryana. M., 2002. S. 94.
Kizilov V.V. Institut administrativnoy otvetstvennosti gosudarstvennykh grazhdanskikh sluzhashchikh Rossii. Saratov: izd-vo Sarat. un-ta, 2012.
Dobrobaba M.B. Problema sistematizatsii sluzhebno-distsiplinarnykh deliktov // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2013. № 7. S. 48-50.
Denisenko V.V. Sistemnyy analiz administrativno-deliktnykh otnosheniy: monografiya / pod. red. prof. V.P. Sal'nikova. SPb.: Sankt-Peterburgskiy universitet MVD RF, 2001. S. 28.
Dobrobaba M.B. Ponyatie i osobennosti sluzhebno-deliktnykh pravootnosheniy // Sovremennoe pravo. 2013. № 8. S. 16-20.
Desyatik M.S. Administrativnaya deliktnost' v oblasti ispolnitel'nogo proizvodstva // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2011. № 6. S. 56–57.
Byalt V.S. Distsiplinarnaya otvetstvennost' sotrudnikov organov vnutrennikh del: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2011. S. 2.
Pis'mo Ministerstva oborony Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 10 sentyabrya 2015 g. № 173/24363 na № 1812/0617.
Federal'naya tamozhennaya sluzhba «O khode realizatsii mer po protivodeystviyu korruptsii v Federal'noy tamozhennoy sluzhbe» [Elektronnyy resurs] URL / http://www.customs.ru index.php? option=com_content&view=article&id=17264&Itemid=2392.
Grishkovets A.A. Pravovoe regulirovanie gosudarstvennoy grazhdanskoy sluzhby Rossiyskoy Federatsii: uchebnyy kurs. M.: Izdatel'stvo «Delo i Servis», 2003. S. 172.
Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 2008. № 20. St. 2383; 2015. № 42. St. 5804.
Grishkovets A.A. Gosudarstvennaya grazhdanskaya sluzhba: uchebnyy kurs / A.A. Grishkovets, Yu.V. Rostovtseva, S.V. Fomina; otv. red. d-r yurid. nauk, prof. N.Yu. Khamaneva. M.: Delo i Servis, 2014. S. 491.
Knyaginina O.N. Distsiplinarnaya otvetstvennost' gosudarstvennykh grazhdanskikh sluzhashchikh Rossiyskoy Federatsii: problemy administrativnoy teorii i praktiki: avtoref. dis. …kand. yurid. nauk. M.. 2010. S. 21.
Pravitel'stvo Ul'yanovskoy oblasti [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://ulgov.ru/pravitel'stvo/ggs/
Ofitsial'naya statisticheskaya informatsiya Upravleniya statistiki truda Federal'noy sluzhby gosudarstvennoy statistiki: Pis'mo ot 22.10.2015 № 1463/05

Reference:

Trofimova G.A.. Constitutional responsibility of local government bodies and officials: problems of theory and legal regulation // Administrative and municipal law. – 2016. – № 3. – P. 223-233. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2016.3.16139.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2016.3.16139

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: Local government bodies and officials are the lower tiers within the state system; their responsibility for their activities is a direct and real guarantee of a proper performance of obligations. Constitutional responsibility is one of the forms of responsibility which can be applied to these subjects. Both the level of independence of local governments, and the possibility of imposition of liability on local government bodies and officials depend on the legal regulation of this form of responsibility. The research is aimed at the analysis of the general provisions of constitutional responsibility of local government bodies and officials. The author applies general scientific and specific legal methods of cognition, including the logical, technical, comparative, and system methods. The author defines the correlation of the concepts “responsibility of local government bodies and officials”, “municipal legal liability”, and “constitutional responsibility”; reveals the problems of defining the content of constitutional offence and considering particular measures as the measures of constitutional responsibility; creates the model of a reasonable differentiation of forms of responsibility within the system of local government.

Keywords: constitutional responsibility, responsibility of authorities, responsibility of officials, chief of a municipal unit, responsibility of a representative body, municipal legal responsibility, dismissal, responsibility to the citizens, responsibility to the state, independence of local government, constitutional responsibility, responsibility of the authorities, responsibility of officials, the head of the municipality, responsibility of the representative body, municipal liability, dismissal resigned, responsibility to the people, responsibility to the state, local government autonomy

References:
Kuz'ko A. V. Konstitutsionno-pravovaya otvetstvennost' organov i dolzhnostnykh lits mestnogo samoupravleniya pered gosudarstvom. Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2008.
Avilov V. V. Konstitutsionno-pravovaya otvetstvennost' organov i dolzhnostnykh lits mestnogo samoupravleniya. Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Belgorod, 2011.
Alekseev I. A. Soderzhanie i vidy munitsipal'no-pravovoy otvetstvennosti // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2006. № 9.
Krasnovskiy M. V. Problemy yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti organov i dolzhnostnykh lits mestnogo samoupravleniya (teoretiko-pravovoy aspekt). Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Sankt-Peterburg, 2008.
Ponomareva V. O. Otvetstvennost' organov mestnogo samoupravleniya i dolzhnostnykh lits mestnogo samoupravleniya pered gosudarstvom: teoreticheskie i pravovye aspekty. Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Chelyabinsk, 2006.
Kondrashev A. A. Teoriya konstitutsionno-pravovoy otvetstvennosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Avtoref. dis. … dokt. yurid. nauk. M., 2011.
Yakovlev V. V. Voprosy otvetstvennosti organov i dolzhnostnykh lits mestnogo samoupravleniya pered gosudarstvom // Sibirskiy yuridicheskiy vestnik. 2005. № 3.
Soldatov S. A. Otvetstvennost' organov i dolzhnostnykh lits mestnogo samoupravleniya pered naseleniem munitsipal'nogo obrazovaniya i gosudarstvom. Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Stavropol', 2012.
Knyazev S. D. Konstitutsionnaya otvetstvennost' v munitsipal'nom prave: voprosy teorii i praktiki // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2005. № 6. S. 83-84.
Chernogor N. N. Klassifikatsiya otvetstvennosti (ee vidy) organov i dolzhnostnykh lits mestnogo samoupravleniya v munitsipal'no-pravovoy nauke // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2007. № 11.
Rozhentsev S. V. Razvitie instituta yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti organov mestnogo samoupravleniya i ikh dolzhnostnykh lits kak formy okhrany interesov sub'ektov malogo i srednego predprinimatel'stva (voprosy teorii). Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Tyumen', 2011.
SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Borisov A. S. Otvetstvennost' mestnogo samoupravleniya i ee vidy // Gosudarstvennaya vlast' i mestnoe samoupravlenie. 2005. № 2.
Kasho V. S. Otvetstvennost' v sisteme mestnogo samoupravleniya: Uchebnoe posobie. Krasnoyarsk, 2005.
Avilov V. V. Nekotorye voprosy udaleniya glavy munitsipal'nogo obrazovaniya v otstavku kak mery konstitutsionnoy otvetstvennosti // Vestnik Vladimirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta. 2011. № 2.
Raspopin M. Otreshenie ot dolzhnosti glavy munitsipal'nogo obrazovaniya // Zakonnost'. 2007. № 10.
Vinogradov V. A. Konstitutsionno-pravovaya otvetstvennost': sistemnoe issledovanie. Avtoref. dis. … dokt. yurid. nauk. M., 2005.
Solov'ev S. G. Munitsipal'no-pravovaya otvetstvennost' mestnogo predstavitel'nogo organa: soderzhanie i aktual'nye problemy // Gosudarstvennaya vlast' i mestnoe samoupravlenie. 2004. № 2.
Mokeev M. M. Konstitutsionno-pravovaya otvetstvennost' organov i dolzhnostnykh lits mestnogo samoupravleniya. Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Saratov, 2003.
Gurkova S. G. Nekotorye problemy realizatsii munitsipal'no-pravovoy otvetstvennosti na primere otzyva deputatov, chlenov vybornykh organov mestnogo samoupravleniya, vybornykh dolzhnostnykh lits mestnogo samoupravleniya // Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2009. № 2.
Dabalaev A. A. Konstitutsionnaya otvetstvennost' organov i dolzhnostnykh lits mestnogo samoupravleniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Avtoref. lis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2006.
Belonovskiy V. N. Otreshenie ot dolzhnosti glavy sub'ekta Rossiyskoy Federatsii kak mera konstitutsionno-pravovoy otvetstvennosti // Vestnik Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. 2011. № 8.
Shugrina E. S. Pochemu mekhanizm udaleniya glav munitsipal'nykh obrazovaniy v otstavku privodit k sushchestvennym narusheniyam prav na mestnoe samoupravlenie // Gosudarstvennaya vlast' i mestnoe samoupravlenie. 2011. № 5.
Solov'ev S. G., Chetvergova A. V. K voprosu o soderzhanii pravovoy konstruktsii udaleniya v otstavku glavy munitsipal'nogo obrazovaniya // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2011. № 5.
Chugunova E. N. Spornye aspekty instituta udaleniya glavy munitsipal'nogo obrazovaniya v otstavku // Problemy prava. 2012. № 5 (36).
Davydova N. Yu. Institut udaleniya glavy munitsipal'nogo obrazovaniya v otstavku // Advokat. 2009. № 12.
Volod'ko I. A. Udalenie glavy munitsipal'nogo obrazovaniya v otstavku: predvaritel'nye itogi realizatsii // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2013. № 1.

References (transliteration):
Kuz'ko A. V. Konstitutsionno-pravovaya otvetstvennost' organov i dolzhnostnykh lits mestnogo samoupravleniya pered gosudarstvom. Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2008.
Avilov V. V. Konstitutsionno-pravovaya otvetstvennost' organov i dolzhnostnykh lits mestnogo samoupravleniya. Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Belgorod, 2011.
Alekseev I. A. Soderzhanie i vidy munitsipal'no-pravovoy otvetstvennosti // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2006. № 9.
Krasnovskiy M. V. Problemy yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti organov i dolzhnostnykh lits mestnogo samoupravleniya (teoretiko-pravovoy aspekt). Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Sankt-Peterburg, 2008.
Ponomareva V. O. Otvetstvennost' organov mestnogo samoupravleniya i dolzhnostnykh lits mestnogo samoupravleniya pered gosudarstvom: teoreticheskie i pravovye aspekty. Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Chelyabinsk, 2006.
Kondrashev A. A. Teoriya konstitutsionno-pravovoy otvetstvennosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Avtoref. dis. … dokt. yurid. nauk. M., 2011.
Yakovlev V. V. Voprosy otvetstvennosti organov i dolzhnostnykh lits mestnogo samoupravleniya pered gosudarstvom // Sibirskiy yuridicheskiy vestnik. 2005. № 3.
Soldatov S. A. Otvetstvennost' organov i dolzhnostnykh lits mestnogo samoupravleniya pered naseleniem munitsipal'nogo obrazovaniya i gosudarstvom. Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Stavropol', 2012.
Knyazev S. D. Konstitutsionnaya otvetstvennost' v munitsipal'nom prave: voprosy teorii i praktiki // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2005. № 6. S. 83-84.
Chernogor N. N. Klassifikatsiya otvetstvennosti (ee vidy) organov i dolzhnostnykh lits mestnogo samoupravleniya v munitsipal'no-pravovoy nauke // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2007. № 11.
Rozhentsev S. V. Razvitie instituta yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti organov mestnogo samoupravleniya i ikh dolzhnostnykh lits kak formy okhrany interesov sub'ektov malogo i srednego predprinimatel'stva (voprosy teorii). Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Tyumen', 2011.
SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Borisov A. S. Otvetstvennost' mestnogo samoupravleniya i ee vidy // Gosudarstvennaya vlast' i mestnoe samoupravlenie. 2005. № 2.
Kasho V. S. Otvetstvennost' v sisteme mestnogo samoupravleniya: Uchebnoe posobie. Krasnoyarsk, 2005.
Avilov V. V. Nekotorye voprosy udaleniya glavy munitsipal'nogo obrazovaniya v otstavku kak mery konstitutsionnoy otvetstvennosti // Vestnik Vladimirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta. 2011. № 2.
Raspopin M. Otreshenie ot dolzhnosti glavy munitsipal'nogo obrazovaniya // Zakonnost'. 2007. № 10.
Vinogradov V. A. Konstitutsionno-pravovaya otvetstvennost': sistemnoe issledovanie. Avtoref. dis. … dokt. yurid. nauk. M., 2005.
Solov'ev S. G. Munitsipal'no-pravovaya otvetstvennost' mestnogo predstavitel'nogo organa: soderzhanie i aktual'nye problemy // Gosudarstvennaya vlast' i mestnoe samoupravlenie. 2004. № 2.
Mokeev M. M. Konstitutsionno-pravovaya otvetstvennost' organov i dolzhnostnykh lits mestnogo samoupravleniya. Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Saratov, 2003.
Gurkova S. G. Nekotorye problemy realizatsii munitsipal'no-pravovoy otvetstvennosti na primere otzyva deputatov, chlenov vybornykh organov mestnogo samoupravleniya, vybornykh dolzhnostnykh lits mestnogo samoupravleniya // Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2009. № 2.
Dabalaev A. A. Konstitutsionnaya otvetstvennost' organov i dolzhnostnykh lits mestnogo samoupravleniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Avtoref. lis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2006.
Belonovskiy V. N. Otreshenie ot dolzhnosti glavy sub'ekta Rossiyskoy Federatsii kak mera konstitutsionno-pravovoy otvetstvennosti // Vestnik Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. 2011. № 8.
Shugrina E. S. Pochemu mekhanizm udaleniya glav munitsipal'nykh obrazovaniy v otstavku privodit k sushchestvennym narusheniyam prav na mestnoe samoupravlenie // Gosudarstvennaya vlast' i mestnoe samoupravlenie. 2011. № 5.
Solov'ev S. G., Chetvergova A. V. K voprosu o soderzhanii pravovoy konstruktsii udaleniya v otstavku glavy munitsipal'nogo obrazovaniya // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2011. № 5.
Chugunova E. N. Spornye aspekty instituta udaleniya glavy munitsipal'nogo obrazovaniya v otstavku // Problemy prava. 2012. № 5 (36).
Davydova N. Yu. Institut udaleniya glavy munitsipal'nogo obrazovaniya v otstavku // Advokat. 2009. № 12.
Volod'ko I. A. Udalenie glavy munitsipal'nogo obrazovaniya v otstavku: predvaritel'nye itogi realizatsii // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2013. № 1.

Reference:

Kotlyarov Yu.V.. Administrative liability in the field of technical regulation: urgent questions of law enforcement practice and its improvement // Administrative and municipal law. – 2016. – № 2. – P. 149-154. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2016.2.17884.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2016.2.17884

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The author considers the aspects of administrative liability enforcement in cases of violation of the legislation in the sphere of technical regulation in the Russian Federation, and the ways of its improvement. Special attention is paid to the principles of justice, legal liability individualization, and the proportionality of the punishment to the gravity of the crime when defining the sums of administrative penalties. The author studies the problem of the turnover-based fine application as a means of repeated offences reduction and the economic entities’ honest behavior encouragement. The methodology of the research is based on the dialectical method and the systems approach. The author applies the methods of analysis, generalization, synthesis, and prognostication. The author concludes that it is rather hard to observe the proportionality criteria and to ensure the individualization of the punishment when applying the administrative fine with the lower limit from 100000 rubles. In some cases such a fine is used as an instrument of economic independence suppression. The author offers to apply the differentiated approach in order to define the amount of penalties, imposed on economic entities, and to apply the fine calculated according to the share of the turnover of capital of the company for the certain period, taking into consideration all mitigating and aggravating circumstances, rather than to apply the fixed fine.

Keywords: liability, measures of state coercion, offence, legislation update, development trends, urgent problems, state control, state supervision, administrative penalty, problem issues

References:
Federal'nyy zakon ot 27.12.2002 g. № 184-FZ «O tekhnicheskom regulirovanii» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 30.12.2002, N 52 (ch. 1), st. 5140
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30.12.2001 № 195-FZ (red. ot 14.12.2015) // Rossiyskaya gazeta, № 256, 31.12.2001
Taktashov V.A., Kotlyarov Yu.V. Nadzor v sfere tekhnicheskogo regulirovaniya segodnya // Standarty i kachestvo, RIA «Standarty i kachestvo», №3 2015, -S.30-33
Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii (prinyata vsenarodnym golosovaniem 12.12.1993) (s uchetom popravok, vnesennykh Zakonami RF o popravkakh k Konstitutsii RF ot 30.12.2008 № 6-FKZ, ot 30.12.2008 № 7-FKZ, ot 05.02.2014 № 2-FKZ, ot 21.07.2014 № 11-FKZ) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 04.08.2014, № 31, st. 4398.
Samoylenko O. A. O maloznachitel'nosti administrativnykh pravonarusheniy // Molodoy uchenyy. — 2013. — №5. — S. 549-551.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda RF ot 02.06.2004 № 10 «O nekotorykh voprosakh, voznikshikh v sudebnoy praktike pri rassmotrenii del ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh» // Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2007. № 8.
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 25.02.2014 N 4-P "Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti ryada polozheniy statey 7.3, 9.1, 14.43, 15.19, 15.23.1 i 19.7.3 Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v svyazi s zaprosom Arbitrazhnogo suda Nizhegorodskoy oblasti i zhalobami obshchestv s ogranichennoy otvetstvennost'yu "Baryshskiy myasokombinat" i "VOLMET", otkrytykh aktsionernykh obshchestv "Zavod "Rekond", "Ekspluatatsionno-tekhnicheskiy uzel svyazi" i "Elektronkompleks", zakrytykh aktsionernykh obshchestv "GEOTEKhNIKA P" i "RANG" i byudzhetnogo uchrezhdeniya zdravookhraneniya Udmurtskoy Respubliki "Detskaya gorodskaya bol'nitsa N 3 "Neyron" Ministerstva zdravookhraneniya Udmurtskoy Respubliki" // "Rossiyskaya gazeta", N 51, 05.03.2014
Federal'nyy zakon ot 31.12.2014 N 515-FZ "O vnesenii izmeneniy v stat'yu 4.1 Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh" // "Rossiyskaya gazeta", N 1, 12.01.2015
Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo suda g.Moskvy ot 19 noyabrya 2014 goda po delu № A40-159502/2014 [Elektronnyy resurs] // Rezhim dostupa http://kad.arbitr.ru/PdfDocument/e4e3c125-3088-4ba9-a004-2aee044bf55f/A40-159502-2014_20141119_Reshenija%20i%20postanovlenija.pdf Ofitsial'nyy sayt Elektronnoe pravosudie (data obrashcheniya: 01.11.2015).
Federal'nyy zakon ot 27.12.2002 g. № 184-FZ «O tekhnicheskom regulirovanii» // "Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF", 30.12.2002, N 52 (ch. 1), st. 5140
Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo suda g.Moskvy ot 19 noyabrya 2014 goda po delu № A40-159502/2014 [Elektronnyy resurs] // Rezhim dostupa http://kad.arbitr.ru/PdfDocument/e4e3c125-3088-4ba9-a004-2aee044bf55f/A40-159502-2014_20141119_Reshenija%20i%20postanovlenija.pdf Ofitsial'nyy sayt Elektronnoe pravosudie (data obrashcheniya: 01.11.2015).
Kotlyarov Yu.V. Tendentsii razvitiya i aktual'nye problemy normativno-pravovoy bazy tekhnicheskogo regulirovaniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo 2016. -№ 1. S.31-36. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2016.1.17282
Kotlyarov Yu.V. Pravoprimenitel'nye aspekty primeneniya mer gosudarstvennogo prinuzhdeniya v sfere tekhnicheskogo regulirovaniya // Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie. - 2015. - 2. - C. 273 - 278. DOI: 10.7256/2310-0508.2015.2.15871.
Eskindarov M.A. Sistematizatsiya mer gosudarstvennogo prinuzhdeniya kak faktor ustoychivogo razvitiya finansovo-ekonomicheskoy deyatel'nosti // Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie. - 2015. - 2. - C. 110 - 113. DOI: 10.7256/2310-0508.2015.2.15639.
Stepanenko Yu.V. Proekt kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh (Obshchaya chast'): pervye vpechatleniya // Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie. - 2015. - 2. - C. 145 - 153. DOI: 10.7256/2310-0508.2015.2.15704.

References (transliteration):
Federal'nyy zakon ot 27.12.2002 g. № 184-FZ «O tekhnicheskom regulirovanii» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 30.12.2002, N 52 (ch. 1), st. 5140
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30.12.2001 № 195-FZ (red. ot 14.12.2015) // Rossiyskaya gazeta, № 256, 31.12.2001
Taktashov V.A., Kotlyarov Yu.V. Nadzor v sfere tekhnicheskogo regulirovaniya segodnya // Standarty i kachestvo, RIA «Standarty i kachestvo», №3 2015, -S.30-33
Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii (prinyata vsenarodnym golosovaniem 12.12.1993) (s uchetom popravok, vnesennykh Zakonami RF o popravkakh k Konstitutsii RF ot 30.12.2008 № 6-FKZ, ot 30.12.2008 № 7-FKZ, ot 05.02.2014 № 2-FKZ, ot 21.07.2014 № 11-FKZ) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 04.08.2014, № 31, st. 4398.
Samoylenko O. A. O maloznachitel'nosti administrativnykh pravonarusheniy // Molodoy uchenyy. — 2013. — №5. — S. 549-551.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda RF ot 02.06.2004 № 10 «O nekotorykh voprosakh, voznikshikh v sudebnoy praktike pri rassmotrenii del ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh» // Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2007. № 8.
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 25.02.2014 N 4-P "Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti ryada polozheniy statey 7.3, 9.1, 14.43, 15.19, 15.23.1 i 19.7.3 Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v svyazi s zaprosom Arbitrazhnogo suda Nizhegorodskoy oblasti i zhalobami obshchestv s ogranichennoy otvetstvennost'yu "Baryshskiy myasokombinat" i "VOLMET", otkrytykh aktsionernykh obshchestv "Zavod "Rekond", "Ekspluatatsionno-tekhnicheskiy uzel svyazi" i "Elektronkompleks", zakrytykh aktsionernykh obshchestv "GEOTEKhNIKA P" i "RANG" i byudzhetnogo uchrezhdeniya zdravookhraneniya Udmurtskoy Respubliki "Detskaya gorodskaya bol'nitsa N 3 "Neyron" Ministerstva zdravookhraneniya Udmurtskoy Respubliki" // "Rossiyskaya gazeta", N 51, 05.03.2014
Federal'nyy zakon ot 31.12.2014 N 515-FZ "O vnesenii izmeneniy v stat'yu 4.1 Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh" // "Rossiyskaya gazeta", N 1, 12.01.2015
Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo suda g.Moskvy ot 19 noyabrya 2014 goda po delu № A40-159502/2014 [Elektronnyy resurs] // Rezhim dostupa http://kad.arbitr.ru/PdfDocument/e4e3c125-3088-4ba9-a004-2aee044bf55f/A40-159502-2014_20141119_Reshenija%20i%20postanovlenija.pdf Ofitsial'nyy sayt Elektronnoe pravosudie (data obrashcheniya: 01.11.2015).
Federal'nyy zakon ot 27.12.2002 g. № 184-FZ «O tekhnicheskom regulirovanii» // "Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF", 30.12.2002, N 52 (ch. 1), st. 5140
Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo suda g.Moskvy ot 19 noyabrya 2014 goda po delu № A40-159502/2014 [Elektronnyy resurs] // Rezhim dostupa http://kad.arbitr.ru/PdfDocument/e4e3c125-3088-4ba9-a004-2aee044bf55f/A40-159502-2014_20141119_Reshenija%20i%20postanovlenija.pdf Ofitsial'nyy sayt Elektronnoe pravosudie (data obrashcheniya: 01.11.2015).
Kotlyarov Yu.V. Tendentsii razvitiya i aktual'nye problemy normativno-pravovoy bazy tekhnicheskogo regulirovaniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo 2016. -№ 1. S.31-36. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2016.1.17282
Kotlyarov Yu.V. Pravoprimenitel'nye aspekty primeneniya mer gosudarstvennogo prinuzhdeniya v sfere tekhnicheskogo regulirovaniya // Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie. - 2015. - 2. - C. 273 - 278. DOI: 10.7256/2310-0508.2015.2.15871.
Eskindarov M.A. Sistematizatsiya mer gosudarstvennogo prinuzhdeniya kak faktor ustoychivogo razvitiya finansovo-ekonomicheskoy deyatel'nosti // Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie. - 2015. - 2. - C. 110 - 113. DOI: 10.7256/2310-0508.2015.2.15639.
Stepanenko Yu.V. Proekt kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh (Obshchaya chast'): pervye vpechatleniya // Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie. - 2015. - 2. - C. 145 - 153. DOI: 10.7256/2310-0508.2015.2.15704.

Reference:

Vlasov K.A.. Competition of norms imposing administrative liability for the violation of legislation on banks and banking // Administrative and municipal law. – 2016. – № 1. – P. 66-71. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2016.1.15925.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2016.1.15925

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The article focuses on the scientific knowledge and theoretical ideas about the condition and the ways of further development of social relations, arising in the sphere of imposition of administrative liability of lending agencies for the violation of current legislation on banking, including prudential requirements of the Central Bank of Russia. The author analyzes particular problems, caused by the dualism of sanctions in the Code of Administrative Offences and banking law of the Russian Federation. On the basis of theoretical researches and the practice of the mentioned norms application, the author formulates conclusions and proposals for the revealed problem elimination. The methodology of the research is based on the modern methods of scientific cognition, including the comparative-legal, the system-structural and the formal-legal methods and the systems analysis, the systems approach and other special scientific research methods. The novelty of the research is defined by the very formulation of the problem and the approach to its solving, taking into account that it hasn’t been sufficiently studied. This collision can be solved provided that the clause 1, part 1 of the article 74 of the Federal Law “On the Central Bank…” is excluded, and the article 15.26 of the Code of Administrative Offences is changed according to the author’s proposals.

Keywords: administrative liability, fine, compulsory standards , banking, Bank of Russia, prudential requirements, banking law, warning, coercion, administrative-legal regulation

References:
Prozorov A.L. Finansovoe pravo: uchebnik / A.L. Prozorov; pod red. O. N. Gorbunovoy.-2-e izd., pererab. i dop.-M.: Yurist, 2001.
Nadezhin N.N. Uchastie nebankovskikh kreditnykh organizatsiy v grazhdanskom oborote: nauchno-prakticheskoe posobie / N.N. Nadezhin.-Belgorod: OONI i RID BelYuI MVD Rossii, 2007.
Eropkin M.I. O klassifikatsii mer administrativnogo prinuzhdeniya // Voprosy sovetskogo administrativnogo prava na sovremennom etape. M., 1963.
Karaseva M.V. Finansovoe pravo. Obshchaya chast': uchebnik / M.V. Karaseva.-M.: Yurist, 2000.
Dem'yanets M.V. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' kreditnykh organizatsiy za narushenie zakonodatel'stva o bankakh i bankovskoy deyatel'nosti: Monografiya. – M., 2011.
Veremeenko I.I. K voprosu o finansovo-pravovoy i administrativno-pravovoy otvetstvennosti v rossiyskom prave // Pravo i upravlenie. XXI vek. 2012. № 4.
Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Ural'skogo okruga ot 17 noyabrya 2010 g. № F09-9362/10-S.
Ukazanie operativnogo kharaktera TsB Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 2 iyulya 2002 g. № 84-T «O Kodekse Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh» // Vestnik Banka Rossii. 2002. № 38.
Prikaz TsB Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 31 marta 1997 g. № 02-139 «O vvedenii v deystvie instruktsii «O primenenii k kreditnym organizatsiyam mer vozdeystviya za narusheniya prudentsial'nykh norm deyatel'nosti» // Vestnik Banka Rossii. 1997. № 23(186).
Federal'nyy zakon ot 10 iyulya 2002 g. № 86-FZ «O Tsentral'nom banke Rossiyskoy Federatsii (Banke Rossii)» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2002. № 28. St. 2790.
Arslanbekova A.Z. Sootnoshenie finansovo-pravovoy i administrativno-pravovoy otvetstvennosti, primenyaemoy za narushenie bankovskogo zakonodatel'stva // Zakonodatel'stvo. 2010. № 1.
Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Dal'nevostochnogo okruga ot 12 aprelya 2011 g. № F03-9261/10.
Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Moskovskogo okruga ot 28 oktyabrya 2003 g. № KA-A40/8495-03 // Sudebno-arbitrazhnaya praktika Moskovskogo regiona. Voprosy pravoprimeneniya. 2004. № 2.
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30 dekabrya 2001 g. № 195-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2002. № 1 (chast' I). St. 1.

References (transliteration):
Prozorov A.L. Finansovoe pravo: uchebnik / A.L. Prozorov; pod red. O. N. Gorbunovoy.-2-e izd., pererab. i dop.-M.: Yurist, 2001.
Nadezhin N.N. Uchastie nebankovskikh kreditnykh organizatsiy v grazhdanskom oborote: nauchno-prakticheskoe posobie / N.N. Nadezhin.-Belgorod: OONI i RID BelYuI MVD Rossii, 2007.
Eropkin M.I. O klassifikatsii mer administrativnogo prinuzhdeniya // Voprosy sovetskogo administrativnogo prava na sovremennom etape. M., 1963.
Karaseva M.V. Finansovoe pravo. Obshchaya chast': uchebnik / M.V. Karaseva.-M.: Yurist, 2000.
Dem'yanets M.V. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' kreditnykh organizatsiy za narushenie zakonodatel'stva o bankakh i bankovskoy deyatel'nosti: Monografiya. – M., 2011.
Veremeenko I.I. K voprosu o finansovo-pravovoy i administrativno-pravovoy otvetstvennosti v rossiyskom prave // Pravo i upravlenie. XXI vek. 2012. № 4.
Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Ural'skogo okruga ot 17 noyabrya 2010 g. № F09-9362/10-S.
Ukazanie operativnogo kharaktera TsB Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 2 iyulya 2002 g. № 84-T «O Kodekse Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh» // Vestnik Banka Rossii. 2002. № 38.
Prikaz TsB Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 31 marta 1997 g. № 02-139 «O vvedenii v deystvie instruktsii «O primenenii k kreditnym organizatsiyam mer vozdeystviya za narusheniya prudentsial'nykh norm deyatel'nosti» // Vestnik Banka Rossii. 1997. № 23(186).
Federal'nyy zakon ot 10 iyulya 2002 g. № 86-FZ «O Tsentral'nom banke Rossiyskoy Federatsii (Banke Rossii)» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2002. № 28. St. 2790.
Arslanbekova A.Z. Sootnoshenie finansovo-pravovoy i administrativno-pravovoy otvetstvennosti, primenyaemoy za narushenie bankovskogo zakonodatel'stva // Zakonodatel'stvo. 2010. № 1.
Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Dal'nevostochnogo okruga ot 12 aprelya 2011 g. № F03-9261/10.
Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Moskovskogo okruga ot 28 oktyabrya 2003 g. № KA-A40/8495-03 // Sudebno-arbitrazhnaya praktika Moskovskogo regiona. Voprosy pravoprimeneniya. 2004. № 2.
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30 dekabrya 2001 g. № 195-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2002. № 1 (chast' I). St. 1.

Reference:

Sidorov E.I.. Problems of qualification of administrative offences consisting in non-declaration or false declaration of goods within the Customs Union of the Eurasian Economic Union // Administrative and municipal law. – 2016. – № 1. – P. 60-65. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2016.1.15723.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2016.1.15723

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The article focuses on legal and organizational problems of administrative offences qualification in Russia. The author analyzes the problems of qualification of administrative offences consisting in non-declaration or false declaration of goods. The author studies the legal grounds and the legal composition of the mentioned administrative offences, their forms and specificities of qualification by the officials of customs agencies, the order of their procedural registration, and the measures of law-enforcement practice improvement. The methodology of the research is based on the recent achievements of epistemology. The author applies general philosophical and theoretical methods (dialectics, the systems method, analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, observation and modeling), traditional legal methods (formal-logical) and the methods of special sociological studies (statistical methods, expert assessments, etc.). The author concludes that at present, in order to ensure legality in the customs sphere, it is necessary to improve the procedural forms of administrative-legal sanctions imposition for the violation of legislation on administrative offences. The author states that it is necessary to develop the institution of administrative liability in the customs sphere; he proposes the measures for administrative offences qualification improvement.

Keywords: identification, non-declaration, offence, sanction, qualification, liability, Declaration, Union, customs, goods

References:
Informatsionno-analiticheskiy obzor pravookhranitel'noy deyatel'nosti tamozhennykh organov (za 2012 – 2014 gody).
Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' za pravonarusheniya v oblasti tamozhennogo dela: uchebnoe posobie. / L.L. Khomyakov, M. Yu. Karpechenkov, E.I. Sidorov. – SPb.: Intermedia, 2015. S 108
Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' za pravonarusheniya v oblasti tamozhennogo dela: uchebnoe posobie. / L.L. Khomyakov, M. Yu. Karpechenkov, E.I. Sidorov. – SPb.: Intermedia, 2015. S 108
Fattakhov V.M. Pravovoe regulirovanie otvetstvennosti za narushenie tamozhennykh pravil (aspekty kvalifikatsii): avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kandidata yur.nauk. – RIO RTA, Lyubertsy, 2003, s.10
Agapov A.B. K voprosu o publichnom prinuzhdenie v rossiyskom prave // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 7. - C. 58 - 87. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.7.9922. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_9922.html
Yarovenko V.V. O problemakh ponyatiya i kvalifikatsii neizgladimogo obezobrazhivaniya litsa // Pravo i politika. - 2015. - 4. - C. 575 - 582. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2015.4.13556.

References (transliteration):
Informatsionno-analiticheskiy obzor pravookhranitel'noy deyatel'nosti tamozhennykh organov (za 2012 – 2014 gody).
Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' za pravonarusheniya v oblasti tamozhennogo dela: uchebnoe posobie. / L.L. Khomyakov, M. Yu. Karpechenkov, E.I. Sidorov. – SPb.: Intermedia, 2015. S 108
Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' za pravonarusheniya v oblasti tamozhennogo dela: uchebnoe posobie. / L.L. Khomyakov, M. Yu. Karpechenkov, E.I. Sidorov. – SPb.: Intermedia, 2015. S 108
Fattakhov V.M. Pravovoe regulirovanie otvetstvennosti za narushenie tamozhennykh pravil (aspekty kvalifikatsii): avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kandidata yur.nauk. – RIO RTA, Lyubertsy, 2003, s.10
Agapov A.B. K voprosu o publichnom prinuzhdenie v rossiyskom prave // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 7. - C. 58 - 87. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.7.9922. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_9922.html
Yarovenko V.V. O problemakh ponyatiya i kvalifikatsii neizgladimogo obezobrazhivaniya litsa // Pravo i politika. - 2015. - 4. - C. 575 - 582. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2015.4.13556.

Reference:

Meshcheryakova T.R.. Administrative liability for the violation of citizens’ labour rights // Administrative and municipal law. – 2015. – № 12. – P. 1249-1253. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.12.17112.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.12.17112

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The article considers the peculiarities of administrative offences, infringing the rights of citizens introduced by labour law and social partnership acts. The author pays special attention to the correlation of terminology used in the Labour Code of the Russian Federation and the Code of Administrative offences. Particular attention is paid to time limitations of liability imposition for administrative offences, provided by the articles 5.27 – 5.34 of the Code of Administrative Offences. Considering particular composition of administrative offences, infringing citizens’ labour rights, the author studies the problem aspects of deeds qualification. The methodology of the research is based on the set of methods of scientific cognition, applied on theoretical and empirical levels: the dialectical method, the methods of analysis, synthesis, comparative jurisprudence, the formal-logical and the system-structural methods. The paper offers the ways of the existing legal regulations improvement when imposing administrative liability for the violation of citizens’ labour rights: unification of terms in the Labour Code and the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation; unification of time limitation of administrative liability imposition for all types of violations of workers’ labour rights.

Keywords: labour right, subject of liability, administrative liability , time limitation, violation of rules, mental element of crime, employer's guilt, continuing crimes, qualification of offences, objective side of offence

References:
Opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 15.03.2013 № 49-KG12-14 // Dokument opublikovan ne byl. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Amelin R.V., Bevzyuk E.A., Volkov Yu.V., Vorob'ev N.I., Vakhrusheva Yu.N., Zherebtsov A.N., Korneeva O.V., Marchenko Yu.A., Stepanenko O.V., Tomtosov A.A. Kommentariy k Kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30.12.2001 N 195-FZ (postateynyy) // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. 2014.
Kandrina N.A. K voprosu o sluzhebnoy otvetstvennosti gosudarstvennykh grazhdanskikh sluzhashchikh // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2015. №3. S.50-53.
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh. Glavy 1-10. Postateynyy nauchno-prakticheskiy kommentariy / R.Ch. Bondarchuk, A.B. Verzhbitskiy, V.A. Vinogradov i dr.; pod obshch. red. B.V. Rossinskogo. M.: Bibliotechka «Rossiyskoy gazety», 2014. Vyp. VII-VIII. 800 s.; Kommentariy k Kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh (postateynyy) / A.G. Avdeyko, S.N. Antonov, I.L. Bachilo i dr.; pod obshch. red. N.G. Salishchevoy. 7-e izd. M.: Prospekt, 2011. 1296 s.
Reshenie Chelyabinskogo oblastnogo suda ot 20.01.2012 po delu N 7-27/2012 // Dokument opublikovan ne byl. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
V.D. Plesovskikh Tendentsii razvitiya federal'nogo administrativno-
deliktnogo prava i zakonodatel'stva // Pravo i politika. - 2012. - 12. - C. 1990 - 1994.
Popova N.F. K voprosu o primenenii mer prinuzhdeniya k gosudarstvennym sluzhashchim // Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie. - 2015. - 2. - C. 154 - 162. DOI: 10.7256/2310-0508.2015.2.15714.
Dolgikh I.P. "Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' sotrudnikov organov vnutrennikh del Rossiyskoy Federatsii: problemy i perspektivy" // Politseyskaya i sledstvennaya deyatel'nost'. - 2014. - 4. - C. 64 - 73. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7810.2014.4.11728. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_11728.html

References (transliteration):
Opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 15.03.2013 № 49-KG12-14 // Dokument opublikovan ne byl. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Amelin R.V., Bevzyuk E.A., Volkov Yu.V., Vorob'ev N.I., Vakhrusheva Yu.N., Zherebtsov A.N., Korneeva O.V., Marchenko Yu.A., Stepanenko O.V., Tomtosov A.A. Kommentariy k Kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30.12.2001 N 195-FZ (postateynyy) // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. 2014.
Kandrina N.A. K voprosu o sluzhebnoy otvetstvennosti gosudarstvennykh grazhdanskikh sluzhashchikh // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2015. №3. S.50-53.
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh. Glavy 1-10. Postateynyy nauchno-prakticheskiy kommentariy / R.Ch. Bondarchuk, A.B. Verzhbitskiy, V.A. Vinogradov i dr.; pod obshch. red. B.V. Rossinskogo. M.: Bibliotechka «Rossiyskoy gazety», 2014. Vyp. VII-VIII. 800 s.; Kommentariy k Kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh (postateynyy) / A.G. Avdeyko, S.N. Antonov, I.L. Bachilo i dr.; pod obshch. red. N.G. Salishchevoy. 7-e izd. M.: Prospekt, 2011. 1296 s.
Reshenie Chelyabinskogo oblastnogo suda ot 20.01.2012 po delu N 7-27/2012 // Dokument opublikovan ne byl. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
V.D. Plesovskikh Tendentsii razvitiya federal'nogo administrativno-
deliktnogo prava i zakonodatel'stva // Pravo i politika. - 2012. - 12. - C. 1990 - 1994.
Popova N.F. K voprosu o primenenii mer prinuzhdeniya k gosudarstvennym sluzhashchim // Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie. - 2015. - 2. - C. 154 - 162. DOI: 10.7256/2310-0508.2015.2.15714.
Dolgikh I.P. "Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' sotrudnikov organov vnutrennikh del Rossiyskoy Federatsii: problemy i perspektivy" // Politseyskaya i sledstvennaya deyatel'nost'. - 2014. - 4. - C. 64 - 73. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7810.2014.4.11728. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_11728.html

Reference:

Khasnutdinov R.R.. Optimization of the systems approach to legal liability // Administrative and municipal law. – 2015. – № 10. – P. 1044-1049. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.10.16559.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.10.16559

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: By means of the analysis of the systems approach evolution in the form of the “general systems theory”, formed in the 20th century, the author reveals a range of drawbacks, and offers an optimal variant of the systems approach application to subject researches in general, and to legal liability in particular. The functional system method is one of the optimal variants of practical application of the systems approach in subject researches. Within this study it gives the opportunity to formulate the basic concept and structural elements of the system of legal liability. The author applies the general and specific scientific research methods: analysis, synthesis and the systems approach to subject researches. The author comes to the following conclusions: firstly, the systems approach, having passed a long period of evolution, in the 20th century was formed in a theoretical concept called “the general systems theory”. But, due to some drawbacks of Bertalanffy’s general systems theory, mainly, the absence of a backbone factor in his definition, there appear the attempts to solve this problem. Among them the author outlines the concept of a functional system. Secondly, the functional systems method is the most optimal variant of the systems approach practical application in subject researches. Thirdly, the functional systems method has a leading position in the methodology of legal liability research, and allows formulating the basic concept and structural elements of the system of legal liability within subject studies.

Keywords: legal, method, systems approach, formation, system, concept, functional system, focused, useful result, liability

References:
Bobkov A.N. Obshchaya teoriya sistem i dialektika edinogo i mnozhestvennogo // Filosofiya i obshchestvo. 2005. № 4.
Marchenko M.N. O priznakakh «sistemy» i sistemnom kharaktere prava // Vestnik Moskovskogo gorodskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriya «Yuridicheskie nauki». 2010. № 1(5).
Yudin E.G. Sistemnyy podkhod i printsip deyatel'nosti. Metodologicheskie problemy sovremennoy nauki / sost.: A.P. Ogurtsov, B.G. Yudin. M.: Nauka, 1978.
Anokhin P.K. Ocherki po fiziologii funktsional'nykh sistem. M., 1975.
Filosofskiy slovar' / pod red. I.T. Frolova. 6-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Politizdat, 1991.
Bogdanov A.A. Vseobshchaya organizatsionnaya nauka (tektologiya). 3-e izd. Berlin, 1929. T. III.
Uemov A.I. L. Fon Bertalanfi i parametricheskaya obshchaya teoriya sistem // Sistemnyy podkhod v sovremennoy nauke. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2004.
Surmin Yu.P. Teoriya sistem i sistemnyy analiz. Kiev: MAUP, 2003.
Bertalanfi L. fon. Obshchaya teoriya sistem-kriticheskiy obzor // Issledovaniya po obshchey teorii sistem. M., 1969.
Filosofiya / pod red. V.N. Lavrinenko. 3-e izd., isp. i dop. M.: Yurist', 2007.
Bertalanffy L. Problems of life. N.Y., 1960.
Eshbi U. Ross. Konstruktsiya mozga. Proiskhozhdenie adaptivnogo povedeniya. M., 1962.
Blyumenfel'd L.A. S mirom vne sistemy, sistema vzaimodeystvuet kak tseloe // Sistemnye issledovaniya. Ezhegodnik. M., 1970.
Cherri K. Chelovek i informatsiya. M., 1972.
Uemov A.I. Sistemnyy podkhod i obshchaya teoriya sistem. M.: Mysl', 1978.
Sadovskiy V.N. Osnovaniya obshchey teorii sistem. M., 1974.
Khasnutdinov R.R. Metod funktsional'noy sistemy v pravovykh issledovaniyakh // Pravo i obrazovanie. 2013. № 6.
Khasnutdinov R.R. Metodologiya sistemnogo podkhoda k yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti: monografiya / otv. red. d.yu.n., prof. R.L. Khachaturov. Samara: SYuI FSIN Rossii, 2014.
Khachaturov P.L., Lipinskiy D.A. Obshchaya teoriya yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti: Monografiya. – SPb.: Izdatel'stvo R. Aslanova «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press», 2007.

References (transliteration):
Bobkov A.N. Obshchaya teoriya sistem i dialektika edinogo i mnozhestvennogo // Filosofiya i obshchestvo. 2005. № 4.
Marchenko M.N. O priznakakh «sistemy» i sistemnom kharaktere prava // Vestnik Moskovskogo gorodskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriya «Yuridicheskie nauki». 2010. № 1(5).
Yudin E.G. Sistemnyy podkhod i printsip deyatel'nosti. Metodologicheskie problemy sovremennoy nauki / sost.: A.P. Ogurtsov, B.G. Yudin. M.: Nauka, 1978.
Anokhin P.K. Ocherki po fiziologii funktsional'nykh sistem. M., 1975.
Filosofskiy slovar' / pod red. I.T. Frolova. 6-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Politizdat, 1991.
Bogdanov A.A. Vseobshchaya organizatsionnaya nauka (tektologiya). 3-e izd. Berlin, 1929. T. III.
Uemov A.I. L. Fon Bertalanfi i parametricheskaya obshchaya teoriya sistem // Sistemnyy podkhod v sovremennoy nauke. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2004.
Surmin Yu.P. Teoriya sistem i sistemnyy analiz. Kiev: MAUP, 2003.
Bertalanfi L. fon. Obshchaya teoriya sistem-kriticheskiy obzor // Issledovaniya po obshchey teorii sistem. M., 1969.
Filosofiya / pod red. V.N. Lavrinenko. 3-e izd., isp. i dop. M.: Yurist', 2007.
Bertalanffy L. Problems of life. N.Y., 1960.
Eshbi U. Ross. Konstruktsiya mozga. Proiskhozhdenie adaptivnogo povedeniya. M., 1962.
Blyumenfel'd L.A. S mirom vne sistemy, sistema vzaimodeystvuet kak tseloe // Sistemnye issledovaniya. Ezhegodnik. M., 1970.
Cherri K. Chelovek i informatsiya. M., 1972.
Uemov A.I. Sistemnyy podkhod i obshchaya teoriya sistem. M.: Mysl', 1978.
Sadovskiy V.N. Osnovaniya obshchey teorii sistem. M., 1974.
Khasnutdinov R.R. Metod funktsional'noy sistemy v pravovykh issledovaniyakh // Pravo i obrazovanie. 2013. № 6.
Khasnutdinov R.R. Metodologiya sistemnogo podkhoda k yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti: monografiya / otv. red. d.yu.n., prof. R.L. Khachaturov. Samara: SYuI FSIN Rossii, 2014.
Khachaturov P.L., Lipinskiy D.A. Obshchaya teoriya yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti: Monografiya. – SPb.: Izdatel'stvo R. Aslanova «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press», 2007.

Reference:

Bondar' E.O., Shurukhnova D.N.. Administrative liability for insurance legislation breach // Administrative and municipal law. – 2015. – № 10. – P. 1039-1043. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.10.15158.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.10.15158

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The authors of the article pay special attention to the issues of administrative liability imposition on insurance agencies for the breach of insurance legislation according to clause 3, article 14.1. of the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation. The authors note that for a long time different approaches to the understanding of breach of license had existed in the judicial practice. The object of the research is the analysis of understanding of breach of license requirements which can lead to the imposition of an administrative fine for the violation of license requirements, or to the recall of a license. Mainly, the authors analyze the administrative-imperative method. Administrative norms determine the code of conduct in the form of categorical directions which can’t be breached, and provide such measures of impact of administrative bodies on other participants of administrative relations as compulsory legal acts, directions and orders, executive actions, administrative coercive measures. The daily administrative-public activities are carried out by means of these measures. Particularly, the settlement of questions of licensing of physical persons and legal entities is carried out by means of issuing of legal acts or by means of executive actions of these bodies. The authors consider the problems of administrative liability imposition on the insurer for the breach of insurance legislation. The authors analyze the judicial practice, particularly, the Decision of the Supreme Court of Arbitration of the Russian Federation No 13004/13 of February 4, 2014 which doesn’t contain the provision about the possibility to revise judicial acts according to new circumstances. The authors note that at present the insurance legislation violation is a breach of license conditions by the insurer. Thus the authors managed to substantiate the refutation of the existing practice of subordinate courts in the part which provides that the breach of the compulsory motor TPL insurance entails civil liability, but not the administrative one. Having analyzed the conclusions of the Presidium of the Supreme Court of Arbitration, the authors suppose that imposition of administrative liability on the insurer for the breach of insurance legislation, provided the correct interpretation by subordinate courts, is of a primary importance.

Keywords: insurance legislation, administrative liability, licensing requirements, insurance activities, licensed activity, license, licensing, imposition, breach, civil liability

References:
Federal'nyy zakon ot 04.05.2011 № 99-FZ (red. ot 14.10.2014) «O litsenzirovanii otdel'nykh vidov deyatel'nosti»
Rasporyazhenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 10.06.2011 № 1021-r (red. ot 28.08.2012) «Ob utverzhdenii Kontseptsii snizheniya administrativnykh bar'erov i povysheniya dostupnosti gosudarstvennykh i munitsipal'nykh uslug na 2011-2013 gody i Plana meropriyatiy po realizatsii ukazannoy Kontseptsii»
Agapova M.A. Institut litsenzirovaniya v administrativnom prave. Dis. na soik. uch. stepeni k.yu.n. Spetsial'nost': 12.00.14. M. 2005.
Agapov A.B. Administrativnoe pravo: uchebnik dlya bakalavrov/ A.B. Agapov.-9-e izd., pererab. i dop.-M.: Izdatel'stvo Yurayt, 2014
Sm.: st. 2 Federal'nogo zakona ot 4 maya 2011goda N 99-FZ "O litsenzirovanii otdel'nykh vidov deyatel'nosti"// SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus»
Sm., naprimer, Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo Suda g. Moskvy ot 12 marta 2014 goda delo № A40-22280/2014.//14-145-186 reshenie TsB ch 3 st.14.1 otkaz. (A75-1180.13)
SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus»: Analiticheskiy obzor ot 24 aprelya 2014 goda
Subanova N.V. Administrativnye pravonarusheniya v sfere publichnoy razreshitel'noy deyatel'nosti. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2010. - 11. - C. 57 - 63.
Nozhkina A.A. K voprosu ob opredelenii sobytiya, na sluchay nastupleniya kotorogo osushchestvlyaetsya strakhovanie dogovornoy otvetstvennosti // Pravo i politika. - 2014. - 4. - C. 512 - 520. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.4.11455.

References (transliteration):
Federal'nyy zakon ot 04.05.2011 № 99-FZ (red. ot 14.10.2014) «O litsenzirovanii otdel'nykh vidov deyatel'nosti»
Rasporyazhenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 10.06.2011 № 1021-r (red. ot 28.08.2012) «Ob utverzhdenii Kontseptsii snizheniya administrativnykh bar'erov i povysheniya dostupnosti gosudarstvennykh i munitsipal'nykh uslug na 2011-2013 gody i Plana meropriyatiy po realizatsii ukazannoy Kontseptsii»
Agapova M.A. Institut litsenzirovaniya v administrativnom prave. Dis. na soik. uch. stepeni k.yu.n. Spetsial'nost': 12.00.14. M. 2005.
Agapov A.B. Administrativnoe pravo: uchebnik dlya bakalavrov/ A.B. Agapov.-9-e izd., pererab. i dop.-M.: Izdatel'stvo Yurayt, 2014
Sm.: st. 2 Federal'nogo zakona ot 4 maya 2011goda N 99-FZ "O litsenzirovanii otdel'nykh vidov deyatel'nosti"// SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus»
Sm., naprimer, Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo Suda g. Moskvy ot 12 marta 2014 goda delo № A40-22280/2014.//14-145-186 reshenie TsB ch 3 st.14.1 otkaz. (A75-1180.13)
SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus»: Analiticheskiy obzor ot 24 aprelya 2014 goda
Subanova N.V. Administrativnye pravonarusheniya v sfere publichnoy razreshitel'noy deyatel'nosti. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2010. - 11. - C. 57 - 63.
Nozhkina A.A. K voprosu ob opredelenii sobytiya, na sluchay nastupleniya kotorogo osushchestvlyaetsya strakhovanie dogovornoy otvetstvennosti // Pravo i politika. - 2014. - 4. - C. 512 - 520. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.4.11455.

Reference:

Khurtin D.O.. Special reasons for exemption of administrative liability for the violation of intellectual property rights // Administrative and municipal law. – 2015. – № 9. – P. 925-928. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.9.16180.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.9.16180

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: Administrative liability for intellectual property rights violation is established in the articles 7.12 and 14.10 of the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation; it is one of the ways to protect intellectual property rights. The subject of the article is the possibility of exemption of administrative liability for such offences, and the study of the problem of the need for introduction of additional reasons for condonation in such cases. The author uses the methods of analysis, analogy, modeling; the research is also based on the study of legal regulations and law-enforcement practice. The author concludes that it is necessary to amend the articles 7.12 and 14.10 of the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation with special reasons for exemption of administrative liability for the violation of intellectual property rights in case of indemnification and reconciliation with an aggrieved party.

Keywords: administrative legislation, administrative liability, exemption of liability, reconciliation with aggrieved party, intellectual property right, author's rights, patent rights, administrative offence, special reasons, property damage

References:
O. V. Markova Perspektivy pravovoy zashchity intellektual'noy sobstvennosti i sposoby ukrepleniya ustoychivogo elementa sistemy pravovoy zashchity intellektual'noy sobstvennosti // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2012.-6.-C. 101-106.
Stulov S.A. Pravovoy rezhim okhrany i zashchity avtorskikh prav na programmnoe obespechenie dlya EVM // Informatsionnoe pravo. 2010. № 3. S. 20-23.
Voynikanis E.A. Pravo intellektual'noy sobstvennosti v tsifrovuyu epokhu: paradigma balansa i gibkosti. M.: Yurisprudentsiya. 2013. 552 s.
Reshenie Sovetskogo rayonnogo suda g. Orel po delu № 5-136/2013 ot 25.06.2013 g.
Reshenie Vyaznikovskogo gorodskogo suda Vladimirskoy oblasti po delu №5-37-2011 ot 08.07.2011 g.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13.06.1996 № 63-FZ (red. ot 08.06.2015) // SZ RF. 1996. № 25. St. 2954.
Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii (chast' chetvertaya) ot 18.12.2006 № 230-FZ (red. ot 31.12.2014) // SZ RF. 2006. № 52 (1 ch.). St. 5496.
Dolgikh I.P. Byt' ili ne byt' institutu osvobozhdeniya ot administrativnoy otvetstvennosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii? // Yuridicheskie issledovaniya. — 2015.-№ 1.-S.1-15. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7136.2015.1.13775.
Zhdanov N.M., Zhdanova A.N. Osvobozhdenie ot administrativnoy otvetstvennosti // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2012. № 4. S. 61-65.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 08.06.2015 № 140-FZ "O dobrovol'nom deklarirovanii fizicheskimi litsami aktivov i schetov (vkladov) v bankakh i o vnesenii izmeneniy v otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii"
Channov S.E. Osnovaniya dlya osvobozhdeniya ot administrativnoy otvetstvennosti // Grazhdanin i pravo. 2011. № 4. S. 3-14.
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30.12.2001 № 195-FZ (red. ot 29.06.2015) // SZ RF. 2002. № 1 (ch.1). St. 1.
Orlov I.V. Nevmenyaemost' kak osvobozhdenie ot administrativnoy otvetstvennosti // Yurist. 2003. № 1.S. 23-26.

References (transliteration):
O. V. Markova Perspektivy pravovoy zashchity intellektual'noy sobstvennosti i sposoby ukrepleniya ustoychivogo elementa sistemy pravovoy zashchity intellektual'noy sobstvennosti // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2012.-6.-C. 101-106.
Stulov S.A. Pravovoy rezhim okhrany i zashchity avtorskikh prav na programmnoe obespechenie dlya EVM // Informatsionnoe pravo. 2010. № 3. S. 20-23.
Voynikanis E.A. Pravo intellektual'noy sobstvennosti v tsifrovuyu epokhu: paradigma balansa i gibkosti. M.: Yurisprudentsiya. 2013. 552 s.
Reshenie Sovetskogo rayonnogo suda g. Orel po delu № 5-136/2013 ot 25.06.2013 g.
Reshenie Vyaznikovskogo gorodskogo suda Vladimirskoy oblasti po delu №5-37-2011 ot 08.07.2011 g.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13.06.1996 № 63-FZ (red. ot 08.06.2015) // SZ RF. 1996. № 25. St. 2954.
Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii (chast' chetvertaya) ot 18.12.2006 № 230-FZ (red. ot 31.12.2014) // SZ RF. 2006. № 52 (1 ch.). St. 5496.
Dolgikh I.P. Byt' ili ne byt' institutu osvobozhdeniya ot administrativnoy otvetstvennosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii? // Yuridicheskie issledovaniya. — 2015.-№ 1.-S.1-15. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7136.2015.1.13775.
Zhdanov N.M., Zhdanova A.N. Osvobozhdenie ot administrativnoy otvetstvennosti // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2012. № 4. S. 61-65.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 08.06.2015 № 140-FZ "O dobrovol'nom deklarirovanii fizicheskimi litsami aktivov i schetov (vkladov) v bankakh i o vnesenii izmeneniy v otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii"
Channov S.E. Osnovaniya dlya osvobozhdeniya ot administrativnoy otvetstvennosti // Grazhdanin i pravo. 2011. № 4. S. 3-14.
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30.12.2001 № 195-FZ (red. ot 29.06.2015) // SZ RF. 2002. № 1 (ch.1). St. 1.
Orlov I.V. Nevmenyaemost' kak osvobozhdenie ot administrativnoy otvetstvennosti // Yurist. 2003. № 1.S. 23-26.

Reference:

Arkhipov S.V.. Individualization of administrative punishment of legal entities // Administrative and municipal law. – 2015. – № 9. – P. 921-924. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.9.14803.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.9.14803

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The subject of the research is the range of problems of law-enforcement practice, connected with the possibility of individualization of administrative punishment for legal entities, and the ways of their solution. Since 2007 the policy of administrative responsibility toughening has been consistently realized, resulting in the increase of fines for legal entities. Taking into account that in most cases of administrative offences there are no other forms of punishment for legal entities, and payment by installments or the legal institution of unimportance was not enough for a just and adequate punishment, implementation of some constitutional principles in the ambit of administrative responsibility was not assured. The study applies the comparative-legal research method; the author uses comparison of legal norms (also in their historical development), regulating this sphere of legal relations, law-enforcement practice and scientific literature. The novelty of the research consists in the fact that it is the first study of historical prerequisites and measures of legitimation of the mechanisms of individualization of administrative punishment for legal entities in accordance with constitutional principles of imposition of punishment. The author believes that the study results can be used by other researchers in this sphere.

Keywords: legal method of regulation, administrative fine, administrative punishment, differentiation, legal entities, individualization of administrative responsibility, administrative responsibility, constitutional guarantees, no alternative to sanctions, law-enforcement practice

References:
http://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=1297022
Mikulin A.I. Printsip sostyazatel'nosti v proizvodstve
po delam ob administrativnykh
pravonarusheniyakh. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2010. - 10. - C. 64 - 72.
Adarchenko E.O. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost'
yuridicheskikh lits publichnogo prava // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 9. - C. 893 - 897. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.9.9605.

References (transliteration):
http://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=1297022
Mikulin A.I. Printsip sostyazatel'nosti v proizvodstve
po delam ob administrativnykh
pravonarusheniyakh. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2010. - 10. - C. 64 - 72.
Adarchenko E.O. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost'
yuridicheskikh lits publichnogo prava // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 9. - C. 893 - 897. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.9.9605.

Reference:

Khurtin D.O.. Public liability for copyright infringement // Administrative and municipal law. – 2015. – № 8. – P. 811-815. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.8.16065.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.8.16065

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: Intellectual property is an important component of spiritual and economic life of society, in this regard the state must ensure the comprehensive protection of intellectual property rights. The subject of this article is the question of public liability for copyright infringement. The purpose of the article is to analyze the criminal offenses and administrative offenses in this sphere and to reveal the deficiencies of legal regulation of public liability for copyright infringement. The work uses the methods of analysis, analogy, modeling, study of legal norms and law-enforcement practice. In the result the author identifies a number of illegal actions which violate copyrights but can't be regulated by the norms of legal or criminal legislation. The author proposes the amendments to the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation which can provide the comprehensive copyright protection by means of public law.

Keywords: plagiarism, copyright, intellectual property, related offenses, criminal liability, administrative liability, public liability, changes in legislation, exclusive rights, offence

References:
Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii (chast' chetvertaya) ot 18.12.2006 № 230-FZ (red. ot 31.12.2014) // SZ RF. 2006. № 52 (1 ch.). St. 5496.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 12.03.2014 № 35-FZ «O vnesenii izmeneniy v chasti pervuyu, vtoruyu i chetvertuyu Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii i otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // SZ RF. 2014. № 11. St. 1100.
Rasporyazhenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 17.11.2008 № 1662-r (red. ot 08.08.2009) «O Kontseptsii dolgosrochnogo sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii na period do 2020 goda» // SZ RF. 2008. № 47. St. 5489.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13.06.1996 № 63-FZ (red. ot 08.06.2015) // SZ RF. 1996. № 25. St. 2954.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 26.04.2007 № 14 «O praktike rassmotreniya sudami ugolovnykh del o narushenii avtorskikh, smezhnykh, izobretatel'skikh i patentnykh prav, a takzhe o nezakonnom ispol'zovanii tovarnogo znaka» // RG. 2007. № 95.
Agamagomedova S.A. Poryadok deystviy tamozhennykh organov RF po zashchite prav na ob'ekty intellektual'noy sobstvennosti i ego optimizatsiya v sovremennykh usloviyakh // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2014. № 6. S. 559 – 568.
Spravka. Otvetstvennost' informatsionnogo posrednika. Ispol'zovanie tovarnykh znakov v informatsionno-telekommunikatsionnoy seti Internet [Ofitsial'nyy sayt Suda po intellektual'nym pravam] // URL: http://ipc.arbitr.ru/node/13619 (data obrashcheniya 01.08.2015).
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30.12.2001 № 195-FZ (red. ot 29.06.2015) // SZ RF. 2002. № 1 (ch.1). St. 1.
Chukovskaya E.E. Rasprostranenie proizvedeniy v seti Internet v natsional'nom i mezhdunarodnom zakonodatel'stve // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya / Journal of foreighn legislation and comparative law. 2013. №2. C. 251-270.
Markova O.V. Perspektivy pravovoy zashchity intellektual'noy sobstvennosti i sposoby ukrepleniya ustoychivogo elementa sistemy pravovoy zashchity intellektual'noy sobstvennosti // Politika i Obshchestvo. 2012. №6. C. 101 – 106.

References (transliteration):
Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii (chast' chetvertaya) ot 18.12.2006 № 230-FZ (red. ot 31.12.2014) // SZ RF. 2006. № 52 (1 ch.). St. 5496.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 12.03.2014 № 35-FZ «O vnesenii izmeneniy v chasti pervuyu, vtoruyu i chetvertuyu Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii i otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // SZ RF. 2014. № 11. St. 1100.
Rasporyazhenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 17.11.2008 № 1662-r (red. ot 08.08.2009) «O Kontseptsii dolgosrochnogo sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii na period do 2020 goda» // SZ RF. 2008. № 47. St. 5489.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13.06.1996 № 63-FZ (red. ot 08.06.2015) // SZ RF. 1996. № 25. St. 2954.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 26.04.2007 № 14 «O praktike rassmotreniya sudami ugolovnykh del o narushenii avtorskikh, smezhnykh, izobretatel'skikh i patentnykh prav, a takzhe o nezakonnom ispol'zovanii tovarnogo znaka» // RG. 2007. № 95.
Agamagomedova S.A. Poryadok deystviy tamozhennykh organov RF po zashchite prav na ob'ekty intellektual'noy sobstvennosti i ego optimizatsiya v sovremennykh usloviyakh // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2014. № 6. S. 559 – 568.
Spravka. Otvetstvennost' informatsionnogo posrednika. Ispol'zovanie tovarnykh znakov v informatsionno-telekommunikatsionnoy seti Internet [Ofitsial'nyy sayt Suda po intellektual'nym pravam] // URL: http://ipc.arbitr.ru/node/13619 (data obrashcheniya 01.08.2015).
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30.12.2001 № 195-FZ (red. ot 29.06.2015) // SZ RF. 2002. № 1 (ch.1). St. 1.
Chukovskaya E.E. Rasprostranenie proizvedeniy v seti Internet v natsional'nom i mezhdunarodnom zakonodatel'stve // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya / Journal of foreighn legislation and comparative law. 2013. №2. C. 251-270.
Markova O.V. Perspektivy pravovoy zashchity intellektual'noy sobstvennosti i sposoby ukrepleniya ustoychivogo elementa sistemy pravovoy zashchity intellektual'noy sobstvennosti // Politika i Obshchestvo. 2012. №6. C. 101 – 106.

Reference:

Teryukov E.O.. On some peculiarities of administrative investigation of administrative offences in the sphere of town building // Administrative and municipal law. – 2015. – № 8. – P. 806-810. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.8.15407.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.8.15407

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The author studies the difficulties of administrative investigation use which, in the author’s opinion, consist in the fact that certain norms of the Federal Law # 294 “On the protection of rights of legal persons and entrepreneurs during state and municipal review” and the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation are practically equal and cause a certain resemblance of the reasons for organization of an unplanned inspection and administrative investigation causing the preference of one of them depending on the decision of a controlling unit in each particular case. The author uses a complex approach of dialectical materialism, the systems analysis and the normative-legal method. The subject of the research is a normative-legal regulation of administrative investigation in administrative procedure in the sphere of town building. The author supposes that a more precise legislative decision about delimitation of the procedures of an unplanned inspection and administrative investigation could promote the optimization of legal regulation of supervisory activity, strengthening of law and order and decrease of corruption in the activities of controlling units.

Keywords: administrative investigation, unplanned inspection, administrative liability, town building, offences in the sphere of town building, Administrative investigation, controlling units, supervisory activities, administrative offence, legitimate interests

References:
Gradostroitel'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Federal'nyy zakon ot 29.12.2004 № 190-FZ (red. ot 31.12.2014) [Tekst] // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF.-03.01.2005.-№ 1 (chast' 1).-St. 16.
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh. Federal'nyy zakon ot 30.12.2001 № 195-FZ (red. ot 06.04.2015) [Tekst] // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF.-07.01.2002.-№ 1 (ch. 1).-St. 1.
O zashchite prav yuridicheskikh lits i individual'nykh predprinimateley pri osushchestvlenii gosudarstvennogo kontrolya (nadzora) i munitsipal'nogo kontrolya. Federal'nyy zakon ot 26.12.2008 N 294-FZ (red. ot 06.04.2015) [Tekst] // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF.-29.12.2008.-№ 52 (ch. 1).-St. 6249.
Reshenie Novoorskogo rayonnogo suda Orenburgskoy oblasti po delu 2-41/2015 (2-638/2014;) ~ M-615/2014 ot 29.01.2015 [Elektronnyy resurs] // URL.: https://rospravosudie.com/
Agapov, A.B. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' [Tekst] / A.B. Agapov. – M.: Yurayt, 2012. – 435 s.
Arzumanyan, A.A. Administrativnoe rassledovanie [Tekst] / A.A. Arzumanyan: avtoref. diss. kand. yur. nauk. – Rostov na Donu, 2009. – 30 s.
Korolev, A.N. Kommentariy k Federal'nomu zakonu ot 26 dekabrya 2008 goda №294-FZ «O zashchite prav yuridicheskikh lits i individual'nykh predprinimateley pri osushchestvlenii gosudarstvennogo kontrolya (nadzora) i munitsipal'nogo kontrolya» [Tekst] / A.N. Korolev, O.V. Pleshakova.-Postateynyy. – M.: Delovoy dvor, 2009. – 315 s.
Kostennikov, M.V. Aktual'nye problemy administrativnogo prava i protsessa [Tekst] / M.V. Kostennikov. – M.: Yuniti-Dana, 2015. – 497 s.

References (transliteration):
Gradostroitel'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Federal'nyy zakon ot 29.12.2004 № 190-FZ (red. ot 31.12.2014) [Tekst] // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF.-03.01.2005.-№ 1 (chast' 1).-St. 16.
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh. Federal'nyy zakon ot 30.12.2001 № 195-FZ (red. ot 06.04.2015) [Tekst] // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF.-07.01.2002.-№ 1 (ch. 1).-St. 1.
O zashchite prav yuridicheskikh lits i individual'nykh predprinimateley pri osushchestvlenii gosudarstvennogo kontrolya (nadzora) i munitsipal'nogo kontrolya. Federal'nyy zakon ot 26.12.2008 N 294-FZ (red. ot 06.04.2015) [Tekst] // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF.-29.12.2008.-№ 52 (ch. 1).-St. 6249.
Reshenie Novoorskogo rayonnogo suda Orenburgskoy oblasti po delu 2-41/2015 (2-638/2014;) ~ M-615/2014 ot 29.01.2015 [Elektronnyy resurs] // URL.: https://rospravosudie.com/
Agapov, A.B. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' [Tekst] / A.B. Agapov. – M.: Yurayt, 2012. – 435 s.
Arzumanyan, A.A. Administrativnoe rassledovanie [Tekst] / A.A. Arzumanyan: avtoref. diss. kand. yur. nauk. – Rostov na Donu, 2009. – 30 s.
Korolev, A.N. Kommentariy k Federal'nomu zakonu ot 26 dekabrya 2008 goda №294-FZ «O zashchite prav yuridicheskikh lits i individual'nykh predprinimateley pri osushchestvlenii gosudarstvennogo kontrolya (nadzora) i munitsipal'nogo kontrolya» [Tekst] / A.N. Korolev, O.V. Pleshakova.-Postateynyy. – M.: Delovoy dvor, 2009. – 315 s.
Kostennikov, M.V. Aktual'nye problemy administrativnogo prava i protsessa [Tekst] / M.V. Kostennikov. – M.: Yuniti-Dana, 2015. – 497 s.

Reference:

Admiralova I.A.. Administrative-jurisdictional policing in provision of rights and freedoms of citizens // Administrative and municipal law. – 2015. – № 8. – P. 798-805. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.8.14691.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.8.14691

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The subject of the article is a range of legal and organizational problems of police activity in the sphere of implementation of the legislation on administrative offences. The object of this article includes public relations arising during the exercise of administrative jurisdiction by the police. The author considers the problem of provision of rights and freedoms of citizens in the respective sphere of activity, draws attention to the problems of use of coercive measures against citizens. Special attention is paid to the provision of rights and freedoms of citizens in the police proceedings on administrative offences.The methodology of the research contains the recent achievements of epistemology. The author uses general philosophical, theoretical methods (dialectics, the systems method, analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, observation), traditional legal methods and the methods used in special sociological research.The author proposes the ways of improvement of organization and implementation of the administrative-jurisdictional policing, especially in the provision of rights and freedoms of citizens. The specific contribution of the author consists in proving of the necessity to suspend the registration of administrative offences automatically, at least while there are technical malfunctions. The novelty of the research consists in the fact that the author proposes to extend the practice of sentencing below the minimum limit, it will meet the principle of humanism.

Keywords: coercion, control, police, officer, complaint, protocol, stage, process, jurisdiction, responsibility

References:
Salishcheva N.G. Grazhdanin i administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya. – M., 1979. – S. 72.
Dugenets A.S. Kopiya postanovleniya po delu ob administrativnom pravonarushenii kak sredstvo zashchity konstitutsionnykh prav grazhdan // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2002. – № 1. – S. 17.
Tsukanov N.N. Teoriya i praktika proizvodstva po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh, osushchestvlyaemogo organami vnutrennikh del: Avtoref. dis. … d-ra. yurid nauk. – Chelyabinsk, 2011. – S. 3.
Dodin E.V. Dokazyvanie v administrativno-yurisdiktsionnoy deyatel'nosti organov vnutrennikh del. – Kiev. 1985. – S. 8.
Lebedchenko O.S. Administrativno-protsessual'nye formy realizatsii litsenzionno-razreshitel'noy deyatel'nosti: sostoyanie i perspektivy. – M., 1999. – S. 7.
Kurakin A.V. Administrativno-yurisdiktsionnaya deyatel'nost' politsii: problemy teorii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2014. - 3. - C. 259 - 271. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.3.11115.
Kurakin A.V. Kompetentsiya politsii v sfere realizatsii zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 28 - 48. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.4.8841. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8841.html
Admiralova I.A., Kareeva-Popelkovskaya K.A. Mery administrativnogo presecheniya i mekhanizm ikh realizatsii politsiey v tselyakh obespecheniya prav i svobod grazhdan // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2014. - 4. - C. 351 - 359. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.4.11434.
Kurakin A.V. Kompetentsiya politsii
v sfere realizatsii zakonodatel'stva
ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 6. - C. 624 - 630. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.06.5.

References (transliteration):
Salishcheva N.G. Grazhdanin i administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya. – M., 1979. – S. 72.
Dugenets A.S. Kopiya postanovleniya po delu ob administrativnom pravonarushenii kak sredstvo zashchity konstitutsionnykh prav grazhdan // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2002. – № 1. – S. 17.
Tsukanov N.N. Teoriya i praktika proizvodstva po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh, osushchestvlyaemogo organami vnutrennikh del: Avtoref. dis. … d-ra. yurid nauk. – Chelyabinsk, 2011. – S. 3.
Dodin E.V. Dokazyvanie v administrativno-yurisdiktsionnoy deyatel'nosti organov vnutrennikh del. – Kiev. 1985. – S. 8.
Lebedchenko O.S. Administrativno-protsessual'nye formy realizatsii litsenzionno-razreshitel'noy deyatel'nosti: sostoyanie i perspektivy. – M., 1999. – S. 7.
Kurakin A.V. Administrativno-yurisdiktsionnaya deyatel'nost' politsii: problemy teorii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2014. - 3. - C. 259 - 271. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.3.11115.
Kurakin A.V. Kompetentsiya politsii v sfere realizatsii zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 28 - 48. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.4.8841. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8841.html
Admiralova I.A., Kareeva-Popelkovskaya K.A. Mery administrativnogo presecheniya i mekhanizm ikh realizatsii politsiey v tselyakh obespecheniya prav i svobod grazhdan // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2014. - 4. - C. 351 - 359. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.4.11434.
Kurakin A.V. Kompetentsiya politsii
v sfere realizatsii zakonodatel'stva
ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 6. - C. 624 - 630. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.06.5.

Reference:

Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V., Myshlyaev N.P.. Reasons for and conditions of administrative offences (delicts) // Administrative and municipal law. – 2015. – № 7. – P. 676-683. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.7.15821.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.7.15821

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The subject of the article is a range of legal and organizational problems of administrative-legal regulation of reasons and conditions of administrative offences ascertainment. The authors carry out the theoretical and legal analysis of the existing concepts regulating this process. The article presents the authors’ attitudes towards the notion of administrative-legal prevention of offences and ascertainment of personal and professional traits of the subject of administrative delict. The main attention of the authors is paid to the development of methods and methodology of administrative-legal regulation of reasons and conditions of administrative offences ascertainment. The article provides the authors’ attitudes towards the interpretation and legal regulation of these categories. The methodology of the research is based on the recent achievements of epistemology. The authors use the general philosophical and theoretical methods (dialectics, the systems method, analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, observation, modeling), the traditional legal methods (formal-logical), and the methods used in special sociological researches (the statistical methods, expert assessments, etc.). The authors conclude that at present in order to provide nomocracy in the sphere of application of administrative legislation it is necessary to enhance the forms and methods of ascertainment of reasons and conditions of administrative offences. The main contribution of the authors is the statement about the need for the development of administrative-legal regulation of revelation of the potential subjects of administrative delicts. The novelty of the research lies in the proposals to develop the forms and methods of administrative-legal regulation of preventive activities and to create the legal and organizational guarantees of legality in Russia.

Keywords: punishment, sanction, offence, competence, police, delict, result, reason, condition, base

References:
Karpets I.I. Prestupnost' kak real'nost' // Voprosy filosofii. 1989. №5. S. 97.
Lazarev B.M., Lunev A.E. Osnovy zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1981. № 4. S. 25.
Lozbyakov V.P. Kriminologicheskie osnovy administrativno-yurisdiktsionnoy deyatel'nosti rossiyskoy militsii: Dis… d-ra. yurid. nauk. M., 1995.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Prichiny pravonarusheniy. M., 1976. S. 8.
Stolbovoy A.P. Administrativno-predupreditel'nye mery militsii kak sredstvo bor'by s pravonarusheniyami v usloviyakh razvitogo sotsializma: Avtoref. diss…kand. yurid. nauk. Kiev, 1984. S. 8.
Petrunina I.K. K voprosu o prichinakh administrativnykh pravonarusheniy v torgovle // Aktual'nye problemy administrativnoy deliktologii. Kiev, 1984. S. 84.
Petrunina I.K. K voprosu o prichinakh administrativnykh pravonarusheniy v torgovle // Aktual'nye problemy administrativnoy deliktologii. Kiev, 1984. S. 84.
Antonyan Yu.M. Rol' konkretnoy zhiznennoy situatsii v sovershenii prestupleniya. M., 1973.
Mel'nik N.G. Prichiny i profilaktika administrativno-nakazuemykh narusheniy pasportnoy sistemy // Administrativno-deliktnye otnosheniya. Kiev, 1979. S. 132.
Mel'nik N.G. Prichiny i profilaktika administrativno-nakazuemykh narusheniy pasportnoy sistemy // Administrativno-deliktnye otnosheniya. Kiev, 1979. S. 132.
Remnev V.I. Aktual'nye voprosy administrativnoy deliktologii v sovremennyy period // Aktual'nye problemy administrativnoy deliktologii. Kiev, 1984. S. 13.
Remnev V.I. Aktual'nye voprosy administrativnoy deliktologii v sovremennyy period // Aktual'nye problemy administrativnoy deliktologii. Kiev, 1984. S. 13.
Mel'nik N.G. Prichiny i profilaktika administrativno-nakazuemykh narusheniy pasportnoy sistemy // Administrativno-deliktnye otnosheniya. Kiev, 1979. S. 131.
Stolbovoy A.P. Administrativno-predupreditel'nye mery militsii kak sredstvo bor'by s pravonarusheniyami v usloviyakh razvitogo sotsializma: Avtoref. diss…kand. yurid. nauk. Kiev, 1984. S. 6.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Prichiny pravonarusheniy. M., 1976.
Bilyalov A.K. Ob opredelenii kategoriy «osnova» i «osnovanie» // Filosofskie nauki. 1976. № 5. S. 142.
Kerimov D.A. Metodologiya prava (predmet, funktsii, problemy filosofii prava). – M., 2001. S. 91.
Filimonov V.D. Kriminologicheskie osnovy ugolovnogo prava. Tomsk: Tomskiy universitet. 1981. S. 22.
Gertsenzon A.A. Vvedenie v sovetskuyu kriminologiyu. M., 1965. S. 136.
Karpets I.I. Problemy prestupnosti. M., 1969. S. 69.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Prichinnost' v kriminologii. M., 1968. S. 10.
Sakharov A.B. O lichnosti prestupnika i prichinakh prestupnosti v SSSR. M., 1961. S. 58.
Antonyan Yu.M. Sotsial'naya sreda i formirovanie lichnosti prestupnika. M., 1975. S. 5.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Kontseptual'nye osnovy profilaktiki pravonarusheniy // Materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii po probleme profilaktiki pravonarusheniy. M., 1997. S. 10.
Filosofskaya entsiklopediya. M., 1960. T. 1. S. 206.
Kobzar' I.A. Sotsial'naya i kriminologicheskaya obuslovlennost' ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti nesovershennoletnikh (teoriya i praktika). M., 1998. S. 36.
Filosofskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar'. M., 1983. S. 707.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Prichiny pravonarusheniy. M., 1976. S. 18.
Avanesov G.A. Teoriya i metodologiya kriminologicheskogo prognozirovaniya. M., 1972. S. 218.
Kuznetsova N.F. Kriminologiya kak nauka // Sovetskaya yustitsiya. 1970, № 2. S. 8.
Goryainov K.K. Kriminologicheskaya obstanovka (metodologicheskie aspekty). M.: VNII MVD SSSR. 1991. S. 21.
Goryainov K.K. Kriminologicheskaya obstanovka (metodologicheskie aspekty). M.: VNII MVD SSSR. 1991. S. 24.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Prichiny pravonarusheniy. M., 1976. S. 126.
Romanov G.A. Informatsionnoe obespechenie upravleniya profilakticheskoy deyatel'nost'yu organov vnutrennikh del // Profilaktika pravonarusheniy. M., 1980. Vyp. 11. S. 15.
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. K voprosu ob osnovanii administrativnoy otvetstvennosti v rossiyskom prave // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 10. - C. 75 - 88. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.10.10153. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_10153.html
Kurakin A.V. Kompetentsiya politsii v sfere realizatsii zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 28 - 48. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.4.8841. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8841.html

References (transliteration):
Karpets I.I. Prestupnost' kak real'nost' // Voprosy filosofii. 1989. №5. S. 97.
Lazarev B.M., Lunev A.E. Osnovy zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1981. № 4. S. 25.
Lozbyakov V.P. Kriminologicheskie osnovy administrativno-yurisdiktsionnoy deyatel'nosti rossiyskoy militsii: Dis… d-ra. yurid. nauk. M., 1995.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Prichiny pravonarusheniy. M., 1976. S. 8.
Stolbovoy A.P. Administrativno-predupreditel'nye mery militsii kak sredstvo bor'by s pravonarusheniyami v usloviyakh razvitogo sotsializma: Avtoref. diss…kand. yurid. nauk. Kiev, 1984. S. 8.
Petrunina I.K. K voprosu o prichinakh administrativnykh pravonarusheniy v torgovle // Aktual'nye problemy administrativnoy deliktologii. Kiev, 1984. S. 84.
Petrunina I.K. K voprosu o prichinakh administrativnykh pravonarusheniy v torgovle // Aktual'nye problemy administrativnoy deliktologii. Kiev, 1984. S. 84.
Antonyan Yu.M. Rol' konkretnoy zhiznennoy situatsii v sovershenii prestupleniya. M., 1973.
Mel'nik N.G. Prichiny i profilaktika administrativno-nakazuemykh narusheniy pasportnoy sistemy // Administrativno-deliktnye otnosheniya. Kiev, 1979. S. 132.
Mel'nik N.G. Prichiny i profilaktika administrativno-nakazuemykh narusheniy pasportnoy sistemy // Administrativno-deliktnye otnosheniya. Kiev, 1979. S. 132.
Remnev V.I. Aktual'nye voprosy administrativnoy deliktologii v sovremennyy period // Aktual'nye problemy administrativnoy deliktologii. Kiev, 1984. S. 13.
Remnev V.I. Aktual'nye voprosy administrativnoy deliktologii v sovremennyy period // Aktual'nye problemy administrativnoy deliktologii. Kiev, 1984. S. 13.
Mel'nik N.G. Prichiny i profilaktika administrativno-nakazuemykh narusheniy pasportnoy sistemy // Administrativno-deliktnye otnosheniya. Kiev, 1979. S. 131.
Stolbovoy A.P. Administrativno-predupreditel'nye mery militsii kak sredstvo bor'by s pravonarusheniyami v usloviyakh razvitogo sotsializma: Avtoref. diss…kand. yurid. nauk. Kiev, 1984. S. 6.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Prichiny pravonarusheniy. M., 1976.
Bilyalov A.K. Ob opredelenii kategoriy «osnova» i «osnovanie» // Filosofskie nauki. 1976. № 5. S. 142.
Kerimov D.A. Metodologiya prava (predmet, funktsii, problemy filosofii prava). – M., 2001. S. 91.
Filimonov V.D. Kriminologicheskie osnovy ugolovnogo prava. Tomsk: Tomskiy universitet. 1981. S. 22.
Gertsenzon A.A. Vvedenie v sovetskuyu kriminologiyu. M., 1965. S. 136.
Karpets I.I. Problemy prestupnosti. M., 1969. S. 69.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Prichinnost' v kriminologii. M., 1968. S. 10.
Sakharov A.B. O lichnosti prestupnika i prichinakh prestupnosti v SSSR. M., 1961. S. 58.
Antonyan Yu.M. Sotsial'naya sreda i formirovanie lichnosti prestupnika. M., 1975. S. 5.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Kontseptual'nye osnovy profilaktiki pravonarusheniy // Materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii po probleme profilaktiki pravonarusheniy. M., 1997. S. 10.
Filosofskaya entsiklopediya. M., 1960. T. 1. S. 206.
Kobzar' I.A. Sotsial'naya i kriminologicheskaya obuslovlennost' ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti nesovershennoletnikh (teoriya i praktika). M., 1998. S. 36.
Filosofskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar'. M., 1983. S. 707.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Prichiny pravonarusheniy. M., 1976. S. 18.
Avanesov G.A. Teoriya i metodologiya kriminologicheskogo prognozirovaniya. M., 1972. S. 218.
Kuznetsova N.F. Kriminologiya kak nauka // Sovetskaya yustitsiya. 1970, № 2. S. 8.
Goryainov K.K. Kriminologicheskaya obstanovka (metodologicheskie aspekty). M.: VNII MVD SSSR. 1991. S. 21.
Goryainov K.K. Kriminologicheskaya obstanovka (metodologicheskie aspekty). M.: VNII MVD SSSR. 1991. S. 24.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Prichiny pravonarusheniy. M., 1976. S. 126.
Romanov G.A. Informatsionnoe obespechenie upravleniya profilakticheskoy deyatel'nost'yu organov vnutrennikh del // Profilaktika pravonarusheniy. M., 1980. Vyp. 11. S. 15.
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. K voprosu ob osnovanii administrativnoy otvetstvennosti v rossiyskom prave // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 10. - C. 75 - 88. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.10.10153. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_10153.html
Kurakin A.V. Kompetentsiya politsii v sfere realizatsii zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 28 - 48. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.4.8841. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8841.html

Reference:

Dresvyannikova E.A.. Execution of decisions on administrative offences in the sphere of traffic safety // Administrative and municipal law. – 2015. – № 7. – P. 670-675. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.7.12989.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.7.12989

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The norms imposing administrative responsibility are formal if the decisions are not executed. The author analyzes law enforcement practice and concludes that in case it is not reasonable to impose a fine (particularly when an administrative fine equals to fines for some types of criminal offences), it is reasonable to impose another type of administrative punishment, thus achieving the main aim – prevention of new offences by the same offender and by other persons. Large fines which are very difficult to exact should be replaced with other proportionate types of punishment. The author of the paper suggests amending the art. 20.25 of the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation with a part 11, containing the responsibility for the evasion of administrative punishment imposed for special rights abuse. The author argues that the adequacy of an imposed punishment for the evasion of administrative punishment will promote the principle of unavoidability of punishment. For data collection and processing the author uses the formal-logical and the dialectical methods, and the comparative-legal, logical and statistical analysis of the cases of administrative offences in the sphere of traffic safety. The toughening of administrative responsibility for offences in the sphere of traffic safety leads only to the decrease of some types of such offences, but it solves neither the problems of the quantity of traffic accidents and the amount of victims, nor the problems in the sphere of the imposed punishment execution. In law enforcement practice of traffic officers administrative executive proceedings are widely used not only for the observance of the principle of unavoidability of punishment, but also as a preventive measure for traffic safety provision. Therefore, the execution of decisions on administrative offences is one of the priority directions in this sphere. This research is aimed at the Russian traffic police efficiency enhancement in the sphere of administrative punishment for traffic violation execution. The author analyzes law enforcement practice of the imposed administrative punishment execution and offers recommendations for legislation enhancement in the sphere of administrative responsibility for traffic violation.

Keywords: natural person, deprivation of a special right, proceedings, execution, decision, fine, offence, punishment, administrative responsibility, traffic safety

References:
Pan'shin D.L., Dresvyannikova E. A. Sroki i poryadok ispolneniya postanovleniya o naznachenii administrativnogo nakazaniya v vide shtrafa // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2013.-№
– S. 898-900. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.9.9099. 9. Sorokin V. D. Paradoksy Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. – 2014.-№ 3. – S.6
Trunov I.L. Problemy bezopasnosti dorozhnogo dvizheniya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo.-2013.-8.-C. 797-801. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.8.9369.
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. K voprosu ob osnovanii administrativnoy otvetstvennosti v rossiyskom prave // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya.-2013.-10.-C. 75-88. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.10.10153. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_10153.html
Dolgikh I.P., Suponina E.A. K voprosu ob optimizatsii otdel'nykh vidov administrativnykh nakazaniy // Yuridicheskie issledovaniya.-2014.-10.-C. 1-18. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2014.10.13225. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_13225.html
Kurakin A.V. Kompetentsiya politsii v sfere realizatsii zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. — 2013. — № 4. — C. 28-48 // URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8841.html
Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 07.10.2014 g. № 2323-O «Po zaprosu mirovogo sud'i sudebnogo uchastka № 56 Nerchinskogo rayona Zabaykal'skogo kraya o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozheniy chasti 1 stat'i 4.5 i chasti 1 stat'i 20.25 Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh» // Pravovaya sistema Konsul'tantPlyus (Data obrashcheniya 26.11.2014 g.).
Poslanie Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii Federal'nomu Sobraniyu Rossiyskoy Federatsii «Rossii nado byt' sil'noy i konkurentosposobnoy» // Rossiyskaya gazeta. – 2002. – № 71. – S. 1-2.
– S.6. 3.Edinyy otchet za desyat' mesyatsev 2014 goda po administrativnoy praktike UGIBDD MVD po Respublike Tatarstan.
Obobshchenie sudebnoy praktiki po administrativnym delam Internet resurs: http://supcourt.ru; perev2.kodms.ru. (Data obrashcheniya 25 noyabrya 2014 g.).
Ofitsial'nyy sayt Gosavtoinspektsii MVD Rossii: htpp://www.gibdd.ru (Data obrashcheniya 17 dekabrya 2014 g.).
Sorokin V. D. Paradoksy Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. – 2014.-№

References (transliteration):
Pan'shin D.L., Dresvyannikova E. A. Sroki i poryadok ispolneniya postanovleniya o naznachenii administrativnogo nakazaniya v vide shtrafa // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2013.-№
– S. 898-900. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.9.9099. 9. Sorokin V. D. Paradoksy Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. – 2014.-№ 3. – S.6
Trunov I.L. Problemy bezopasnosti dorozhnogo dvizheniya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo.-2013.-8.-C. 797-801. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.8.9369.
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. K voprosu ob osnovanii administrativnoy otvetstvennosti v rossiyskom prave // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya.-2013.-10.-C. 75-88. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.10.10153. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_10153.html
Dolgikh I.P., Suponina E.A. K voprosu ob optimizatsii otdel'nykh vidov administrativnykh nakazaniy // Yuridicheskie issledovaniya.-2014.-10.-C. 1-18. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2014.10.13225. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_13225.html
Kurakin A.V. Kompetentsiya politsii v sfere realizatsii zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. — 2013. — № 4. — C. 28-48 // URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8841.html
Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 07.10.2014 g. № 2323-O «Po zaprosu mirovogo sud'i sudebnogo uchastka № 56 Nerchinskogo rayona Zabaykal'skogo kraya o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozheniy chasti 1 stat'i 4.5 i chasti 1 stat'i 20.25 Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh» // Pravovaya sistema Konsul'tantPlyus (Data obrashcheniya 26.11.2014 g.).
Poslanie Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii Federal'nomu Sobraniyu Rossiyskoy Federatsii «Rossii nado byt' sil'noy i konkurentosposobnoy» // Rossiyskaya gazeta. – 2002. – № 71. – S. 1-2.
– S.6. 3.Edinyy otchet za desyat' mesyatsev 2014 goda po administrativnoy praktike UGIBDD MVD po Respublike Tatarstan.
Obobshchenie sudebnoy praktiki po administrativnym delam Internet resurs: http://supcourt.ru; perev2.kodms.ru. (Data obrashcheniya 25 noyabrya 2014 g.).
Ofitsial'nyy sayt Gosavtoinspektsii MVD Rossii: htpp://www.gibdd.ru (Data obrashcheniya 17 dekabrya 2014 g.).
Sorokin V. D. Paradoksy Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. – 2014.-№

Reference:

Zutikov I.A.. The protection of rights and lawful interests of lending agencies in tax process // Administrative and municipal law. – 2015. – № 6. – P. 582-587. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.6.15655.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.6.15655

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The article considers a lending agency as a specialized subject and its rights and lawful interests in the process of tax obligations discharge in tax process. Special attention is paid to the definition of the term “tax process” and to the formation of the author’s definition of this term. The author outlines the key problems of the protection of the rights and lawful interests of lending agencies, as resolution of conflicts between lending agencies and rating authorities in the sphere of bank secrecy. The author considers the infringement of tax legislation by lending agencies including a failure to implement the decision of a rating authority or a violation of order of account opening for a taxpayer. The author uses special legal methods of scientific research such as the comparative-legal method and the formal-logical method; partially, the author uses the method of interpretation. The main contribution of the author to the study of the essence of lending agencies in tax legal relations is a profound consideration of the role of a lending agency in a trial and in interaction with rating authorities. One of the important elements of the study is the consideration of the term “tax process” and its sense from the viewpoint of the modern scientific community.

Keywords: tax, right, lawful interest, lending agency, tax process, tax law, protection of rights, process, procedure, responsibility

References:
Nalogovyy kodeks RF (chast' pervaya) ot 31. 07. 1998 № 146-FZ //Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 1998. № 31. St. 3824.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 02. 12. 1990 № 395-1 «O bankakh i bankovskoy deyatel'nosti» //Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 1996. № 6. St. 492
Polozhenie o poryadke soobshcheniya bankom v elektronnom vide nalogovomu organu ob otkrytii ili o zakrytii scheta, vklada (depozita), ob izmenenii rekvizitov scheta, vklada (depozita). (utv. Bankom Rossii 07. 09. 2007 № 311-P) //Vestnik Banka Rossii. 2007. № 58.
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 12. 10. 1998 № 24-P «Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti punkta 3 stat'i 11 Zakona RF ot 27 dekabrya 1991 goda «Ob osnovakh nalogovoy sistemy v RF» //Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 1998. № 42. St. 5211.
Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 06. 12. 2001 № 257-O «Po zhalobe Krasnoyarskogo filiala zakrytogo aktsionernogo obshchestva «Kommercheskiy Bank «Lanta – Bank» na narushenie konstitutsionnykh prav i svobod punktami 1 i 2 st. 135 i chast'yu vtoroy stat'i 136 Nalogovogo kodeksa RF» //Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 2002. №
St. 625. 6.Postanovlenie FAS Vostochno-Sibirskogo okruga ot 10. 03. 2011 po delu № A78-6096/2010 //SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Postanovlenie FAS Ural'skogo okruga ot 12. 03. 2012 № F09-193/12 po delu № A50P-464/2011 //SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Postanovlenie Sed'mogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 04. 03. 2013 po delu № A45-23956/2012 «Po delu o priznanii nedeystvitel'nym resheniya nalogovogo organa o privlechenii k otvetstvennosti v vide shtrafa v svyazi s nepredstavleniem bankom spravok (vypisok) po operatsiyam i schetam v nalogovyy organ» //SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Vinnitskiy D. V. Nalogovoe protsedurnoe pravo i nalogovyy protsess: problemy stanovleniya //Zakonodatel'stvo. 2003. № 2.
Dubinskiy A. M. Nalogovye organy Rossii: teoriya i praktika finansovogo kontrolya. M., 2014.
Kolesnichenko T. V. Dosudebnyy i sudebnyy poryadok uregulirovaniya sporov po rezul'tatam nalogovykh proverok. M., 2012.
Kuznechenkova V. E. Nalogovyy protsess: sovremennaya kontseptsiya pravovogo regulirovaniya: Dis. …d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 2004.
Ediev S. A. Voprosy obespecheniya bankovskoy tayny v nalogovom kontrole: zakonodatel'noe obespechenie i problemy sudebnoy praktiki //Finansovoe pravo. 2013. № 7.

References (transliteration):
Nalogovyy kodeks RF (chast' pervaya) ot 31. 07. 1998 № 146-FZ //Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 1998. № 31. St. 3824.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 02. 12. 1990 № 395-1 «O bankakh i bankovskoy deyatel'nosti» //Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 1996. № 6. St. 492
Polozhenie o poryadke soobshcheniya bankom v elektronnom vide nalogovomu organu ob otkrytii ili o zakrytii scheta, vklada (depozita), ob izmenenii rekvizitov scheta, vklada (depozita). (utv. Bankom Rossii 07. 09. 2007 № 311-P) //Vestnik Banka Rossii. 2007. № 58.
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 12. 10. 1998 № 24-P «Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti punkta 3 stat'i 11 Zakona RF ot 27 dekabrya 1991 goda «Ob osnovakh nalogovoy sistemy v RF» //Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 1998. № 42. St. 5211.
Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 06. 12. 2001 № 257-O «Po zhalobe Krasnoyarskogo filiala zakrytogo aktsionernogo obshchestva «Kommercheskiy Bank «Lanta – Bank» na narushenie konstitutsionnykh prav i svobod punktami 1 i 2 st. 135 i chast'yu vtoroy stat'i 136 Nalogovogo kodeksa RF» //Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 2002. №
St. 625. 6.Postanovlenie FAS Vostochno-Sibirskogo okruga ot 10. 03. 2011 po delu № A78-6096/2010 //SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Postanovlenie FAS Ural'skogo okruga ot 12. 03. 2012 № F09-193/12 po delu № A50P-464/2011 //SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Postanovlenie Sed'mogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 04. 03. 2013 po delu № A45-23956/2012 «Po delu o priznanii nedeystvitel'nym resheniya nalogovogo organa o privlechenii k otvetstvennosti v vide shtrafa v svyazi s nepredstavleniem bankom spravok (vypisok) po operatsiyam i schetam v nalogovyy organ» //SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Vinnitskiy D. V. Nalogovoe protsedurnoe pravo i nalogovyy protsess: problemy stanovleniya //Zakonodatel'stvo. 2003. № 2.
Dubinskiy A. M. Nalogovye organy Rossii: teoriya i praktika finansovogo kontrolya. M., 2014.
Kolesnichenko T. V. Dosudebnyy i sudebnyy poryadok uregulirovaniya sporov po rezul'tatam nalogovykh proverok. M., 2012.
Kuznechenkova V. E. Nalogovyy protsess: sovremennaya kontseptsiya pravovogo regulirovaniya: Dis. …d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 2004.
Ediev S. A. Voprosy obespecheniya bankovskoy tayny v nalogovom kontrole: zakonodatel'noe obespechenie i problemy sudebnoy praktiki //Finansovoe pravo. 2013. № 7.

Reference:

Lapina M.A.. Optimal legal methods providing the harmonization of the system of legal sanctions of administrative and criminal legislation // Administrative and municipal law. – 2015. – № 6. – P. 575-581. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.6.15520.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.6.15520

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The subject of the article is a range of legal and organizational problems of administrative-legal regulation of administrative sanctions. The author carries out the theoretic and legal analysis of administrative sanctions. Legal sanctions, provided by the Code of Administrative Offences and the Criminal Code, don’t correlate with each other from the viewpoint of optimal measures of state coercion which should provide the restoration of justice in the relations between the participants of economic activity and economic interests of the state. The existing sanctions, taking into account the increasing number of economic and financial offences, don’t provide special prevention in relation to economic offenders and general prevention on the part of other economic subjects. The main attention of the author is paid to the defining of principles of harmonization of the system of legal sanctions in administrative and criminal legislation. The author offers the following methods of harmonization of criminal and administrative sanctions: administrative collateral estoppel, the “linkage” to sectoral legislation, for some economic cases – nonalternative sanctions, etc. The article presents the author’s ideas about criminal responsibility of legal entities. The methodology of the research is based on the recent achievements of epistemology. The author uses the general philosophical and theoretical methods (dialectics, the systems method, analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, observation, modeling), the traditional legal methods (formal-logical) and the methods, used in special sociological research (the statistical method, expert assessments, etc.). The author concludes that currently it is necessary to enhance the forms and methods of administrative-legal influence on the state and the private sectors of Russian economy in order to provide law and order in the economic sphere. The author states that it is necessary to reduce the quantity of sanctions and to increase the quantity of encouraging norms both in criminal and administrative legislation.

Keywords: nonalternative, collateral estoppel, responsibility, coercion, punishment, sanction, proceedings, delict , administrative, law

References:
Tikhonova S.S. Osobennosti konstruirovaniya sanktsiy v ugolovnom zakone:teoriya i zakonotvorcheskaya praktika»// Yuridicheskaya tekhnika. 2013. № 7 (ch.2). S. 752.
Yakovlev V.F. O ponyatii pravovoy otvetstvennosti // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava №1, 2014. S. 5-7.
ch.2 st. 7, "Kommentariy k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii" (postateynyy) (13-e izdanie, pererabotannoe i dopolnennoe) (otv. red. V.M. Lebedev) ("Yurayt", 2013)
Vitruk N.V. Obshchaya teoriya yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti. 2-e izd., ispravlennoe i dop. M.: NORMA, 2009. 432 s.
Kontseptsiya razvitiya rossiyskogo zakonodatel'stva / otv. red. T.Ya. Khabrieva, Yu.A. Tikhomirov. M.: IZiSP pri Pravitel'stve RF; ID «Yurisprudentsiya», 2014. S.58 6. Poslanie Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii Dmitriya Medvedeva Federal'nomu Sobraniyu Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 12 noyabrya 2009 g. //"Rossiyskaya gazeta", N 214, 13.11.2009. 7. Kolosova V.I. Administrativnaya preyuditsiya kak sredstvo preduprezhdeniya prestupleniya i sovershenstvovaniya ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. 2011. № 5 (1). S. 248 8. Tikhonova S.S. Osobennosti konstruirovaniya sanktsiy v ugolovnom zakone:teoriya i zakonotvorcheskaya praktika»// Yuridicheskaya tekhnika. 2013. № 7 (ch.2). S. 755. 9. Tsit. po publikatsii: Tikhonova S.S. Osobennosti konstruirovaniya sanktsiy v ugolovnom zakone:teoriya i zakonotvorcheskaya praktika»// Yuridicheskaya tekhnika. 2013. № 7 (ch.2). S. 753. 10. Proekt Federal'nogo zakona "O vnesenii izmeneniy v nekotorye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii v svyazi s vvedeniem instituta ugolovno-pravovogo vozdeystviya v otnoshenii yuridicheskikh lits" (podgotovlen SK Rossii) (ne vnesen v GD FS RF, tekst po sostoyaniyu na 28.02.2012) //SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
Kurakin A.V. Kompetentsiya politsii v sfere realizatsii zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 28 - 48. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.4.8841. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8841.html
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. K voprosu ob osnovanii administrativnoy otvetstvennosti v rossiyskom prave // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 10. - C. 75 - 88. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.10.10153. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_10153.html
Agapov A.B. K voprosu o publichnom prinuzhdenie v rossiyskom prave // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 7. - C. 58 - 87. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.7.9922. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_9922.html

References (transliteration):
Tikhonova S.S. Osobennosti konstruirovaniya sanktsiy v ugolovnom zakone:teoriya i zakonotvorcheskaya praktika»// Yuridicheskaya tekhnika. 2013. № 7 (ch.2). S. 752.
Yakovlev V.F. O ponyatii pravovoy otvetstvennosti // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava №1, 2014. S. 5-7.
ch.2 st. 7, "Kommentariy k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii" (postateynyy) (13-e izdanie, pererabotannoe i dopolnennoe) (otv. red. V.M. Lebedev) ("Yurayt", 2013)
Vitruk N.V. Obshchaya teoriya yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti. 2-e izd., ispravlennoe i dop. M.: NORMA, 2009. 432 s.
Kontseptsiya razvitiya rossiyskogo zakonodatel'stva / otv. red. T.Ya. Khabrieva, Yu.A. Tikhomirov. M.: IZiSP pri Pravitel'stve RF; ID «Yurisprudentsiya», 2014. S.58 6. Poslanie Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii Dmitriya Medvedeva Federal'nomu Sobraniyu Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 12 noyabrya 2009 g. //"Rossiyskaya gazeta", N 214, 13.11.2009. 7. Kolosova V.I. Administrativnaya preyuditsiya kak sredstvo preduprezhdeniya prestupleniya i sovershenstvovaniya ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. 2011. № 5 (1). S. 248 8. Tikhonova S.S. Osobennosti konstruirovaniya sanktsiy v ugolovnom zakone:teoriya i zakonotvorcheskaya praktika»// Yuridicheskaya tekhnika. 2013. № 7 (ch.2). S. 755. 9. Tsit. po publikatsii: Tikhonova S.S. Osobennosti konstruirovaniya sanktsiy v ugolovnom zakone:teoriya i zakonotvorcheskaya praktika»// Yuridicheskaya tekhnika. 2013. № 7 (ch.2). S. 753. 10. Proekt Federal'nogo zakona "O vnesenii izmeneniy v nekotorye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii v svyazi s vvedeniem instituta ugolovno-pravovogo vozdeystviya v otnoshenii yuridicheskikh lits" (podgotovlen SK Rossii) (ne vnesen v GD FS RF, tekst po sostoyaniyu na 28.02.2012) //SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
Kurakin A.V. Kompetentsiya politsii v sfere realizatsii zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 28 - 48. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.4.8841. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8841.html
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. K voprosu ob osnovanii administrativnoy otvetstvennosti v rossiyskom prave // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 10. - C. 75 - 88. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.10.10153. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_10153.html
Agapov A.B. K voprosu o publichnom prinuzhdenie v rossiyskom prave // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 7. - C. 58 - 87. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.7.9922. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_9922.html

Reference:

Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V., Tregubova E.V., Myshlyaev N.P.. Conceptual grounds of administrative delictology // Administrative and municipal law. – 2015. – № 6. – P. 563-574. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.6.15260.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.6.15260

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The subject of the research is a range of organizational and legal problems of administrative delinquency forecasting and defining of its efficiency in modern socio-economic and political conditions. The object of the research is a range of social relations appearing in the process of administrative delinquency forecasting. The authors study the elements of the mechanism of administrative delinquency forecasting and formulate the ways of its efficiency enhancement. The authors pay special attention to the development of the criteria of administrative delinquency prevention efficiency. The methodology of the research is based on the recent achievements of epistemology. The authors use the general philosophical and theoretical methods (dialectics, the systems method, analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, observation, modeling), the traditional legal methods (formal-logical) and the methods used in special sociological research (the statistical method, expert assessments, etc.). The authors conclude that the abovementioned sphere of internal affairs is not efficient enough. Therefore it is necessary to develop the legal base of police activities in the sphere of administrative delinquency forecasting. The main authors’ contribution is the study of this problem. The novelty of the research lies in the development of administrative delinquency forecasting instruments.

Keywords: delict, forecast, police, prevention, concept, regulation, punishment, offence, delinquency, crime

References:
Avanesov G.A. Kriminologiya i sotsial'naya profilaktika. M., 1980. S. 20.
Kerimov D.A. Metodologiya prava (predmet, funktsii, problemy filosofii prava) / 2-e izd.-M.: Avanta+, 2001. S. 93.
Mirskaya E.Z. Mekhanizm vospriyatiya i otsenki novogo znaniya v nauke // Voprosy filosofii. 1977. № 12. S. 50.
Shergin A.P. Administrativno-yurisdiktsionnaya deyatel'nost' organov vnutrennikh del: problemy nauchnogo obespecheniya. M., 2000. S. 92.
Osnovnye instituty administrativno-deliktnogo prava / Pod red. A.P. Shergina. M., 1999. S. 67.
Shergin A.P. Administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya. M., 1979.
Popov L.L. Effektivnost' administrativno-pravovykh sanktsiy v sfere okhrany obshchestvennogo poryadka. M., 1976 i dr.
Koval' L.V. Administrativno-deliktnoe otnoshenie. Kiev, 1979.
Shergin A.P. Problemy administrativno-deliktnogo prava // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 1994. № 8-9. S. 60.
Zubov I.N. O vliyanii rezul'tatov bor'by s nekotorymi vidami administrativnykh pravonarusheniy na kriminal'nuyu obstanovku i obshchestvenno-politicheskuyu situatsiyu v Rossii // Bezopasnost' lichnosti, obshchestva, gosudarstva i spetssluzhby Rossii. M., 1994. S. 43.
Lozbyakov V.P. Kriminologiya i administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya militsii. M., 1996. S. 7.
Zinchenko E.Yu. Administrativno-pravovaya deyatel'nost' organov vnutrennikh del po bor'be s pravonarusheniyami korystnoy napravlennosti: Avtoref. diss… kand. yurid. nauk. M., 1993.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Prichiny pravonarusheniy. – M., 1976. S. 84.
Remnev V.I. Aktual'nye voprosy administrativnoy deliktologii. M. 1979.
Osnovnye instituty administrativno-deliktnogo prava / Pod red. A.P. Shergina. M., 1999. S. 7.
Bel'skiy K.S. Fenomenologiya administrativnogo prava. – Smolensk. 1995. S. 111.
Andreevskiy I.E. Politseyskoe pravo. SPb. T.1. Vvedenie i Chast' I. Politsiya bezopasnosti. 1874. S. 1.
Solovey Yu.P. Pravovoe regulirovanie deyatel'nosti militsii v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Omsk, 1993. S. 410.
Kolpakov V.K. K istorii vozniknoveniya i razvitiya obshchestvennykh nachal v upravlenii administrativnoy deliktnosti // Aktual'nye problemy administrativnoy deliktologii. Kiev, 1984. S. 174.
Mel'nik N.G. Prichiny i profilaktika administrativno nakazuemykh narusheniy pasportnoy sistemy // Aktual'nye problemy administrativnoy deliktologii. Kiev, 1984. S. 134.
Remnev V.I. Aktual'nye voprosy administrativnoy deliktologii v sovremennyy period // Aktual'nye problemy administrativnoy deliktologii. Kiev, 1984. S. 6.
Zhigarev E.S. K voprosu o profilaktike administrativnykh prostupkov // Problemy profilaktiki pravonarusheniy v razvitom sotsialisticheskom obshchestve. M., 1982. S. 85.
Lazarev B.M., Lunev A.E. Osnovy zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1981. № 4. S. 25.
Avanesov G.A. Kriminologiya. Prognostika. Upravlenie. Gor'kiy, 1975. S. 102.
Gertsenzon A.A. Teoreticheskie predposylki izucheniya prestupnosti // Voprosy metodiki izucheniya i preduprezhdeniya prestupleniy. M., 1962. S. 512.
Igoshev K.E.; Ustinov V.S. Vvedenie v kurs profilaktiki pravonarusheniy. Gor'kiy, 1973 S. 197.
Lekar' A.G. Osnovnye problemy teorii i praktiki predotvrashcheniya prestupleniy organami okhrany obshchestvennogo poryadka // Trudy Vysshey shkoly MOOP SSSR. M., 1968. Vyp. 21. S. 12
Min'kovskiy G.M., Arzumanyan T.M. i dr. Preduprezhdenie prestupleniy. M., 1962. S. 19.
Dodin E.V. Metodika izucheniya prichin administrativnykh pravonarusheniy // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1983, № 11. S. 30.
Dodin E.V. Administrativnaya deliktologiya v sisteme yuridicheskoy nauki // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1991. № 12. S. 36.
Ostapenko A.I. Administrativnaya deliktnost' v oblasti okhrany obshchestvennogo poryadka i ee profilaktika organami vnutrennikh del: Avtoref. dis... kand. yurid. nauk. Kiev, 1983. S. 14.
Shergin A.P. Administrativno-yurisdiktsionnaya deyatel'nost' organov vnutrennikh del: problemy nauchnogo obespecheniya // Materialy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii 10 aprelya 2000 g. – M., 2000. S. 93.
Genzyuk E.E. Administrativnaya deliktologiya: Dis… d-ra. yurid. nauk. M., 2002. S.29.
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. K voprosu ob osnovanii administrativnoy otvetstvennosti v rossiyskom prave // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 10. - C. 75 - 88. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.10.10153. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_10153.html
Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V., Myshlyaev N.P. Pravovoe regulirovanie deyatel'nosti politsii po profilaktiki pravonarusheniy v zarubezhnykh gosudarstvakh // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2015. - 1. - C. 24 - 34. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2015.1.14255.
Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V., Myshlyaev N.P. K voprosu o prichinakh i usloviyakh administrativnoy deliktnosti // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2015. - 2. - C. 152 - 159. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.2.14281.
Kurakin A.V. Kompetentsiya politsii
v sfere realizatsii zakonodatel'stva
ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 6. - C. 624 - 630. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.06.5.
Kurakin A.V., Badulin A.D., Tregubova E.V. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' za pravonarusheniya na rynke alkogolya i rol' politsii v ee realizatsii // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 10. - C. 28 - 74. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.10.10151. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_10151.html

References (transliteration):
Avanesov G.A. Kriminologiya i sotsial'naya profilaktika. M., 1980. S. 20.
Kerimov D.A. Metodologiya prava (predmet, funktsii, problemy filosofii prava) / 2-e izd.-M.: Avanta+, 2001. S. 93.
Mirskaya E.Z. Mekhanizm vospriyatiya i otsenki novogo znaniya v nauke // Voprosy filosofii. 1977. № 12. S. 50.
Shergin A.P. Administrativno-yurisdiktsionnaya deyatel'nost' organov vnutrennikh del: problemy nauchnogo obespecheniya. M., 2000. S. 92.
Osnovnye instituty administrativno-deliktnogo prava / Pod red. A.P. Shergina. M., 1999. S. 67.
Shergin A.P. Administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya. M., 1979.
Popov L.L. Effektivnost' administrativno-pravovykh sanktsiy v sfere okhrany obshchestvennogo poryadka. M., 1976 i dr.
Koval' L.V. Administrativno-deliktnoe otnoshenie. Kiev, 1979.
Shergin A.P. Problemy administrativno-deliktnogo prava // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 1994. № 8-9. S. 60.
Zubov I.N. O vliyanii rezul'tatov bor'by s nekotorymi vidami administrativnykh pravonarusheniy na kriminal'nuyu obstanovku i obshchestvenno-politicheskuyu situatsiyu v Rossii // Bezopasnost' lichnosti, obshchestva, gosudarstva i spetssluzhby Rossii. M., 1994. S. 43.
Lozbyakov V.P. Kriminologiya i administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya militsii. M., 1996. S. 7.
Zinchenko E.Yu. Administrativno-pravovaya deyatel'nost' organov vnutrennikh del po bor'be s pravonarusheniyami korystnoy napravlennosti: Avtoref. diss… kand. yurid. nauk. M., 1993.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Prichiny pravonarusheniy. – M., 1976. S. 84.
Remnev V.I. Aktual'nye voprosy administrativnoy deliktologii. M. 1979.
Osnovnye instituty administrativno-deliktnogo prava / Pod red. A.P. Shergina. M., 1999. S. 7.
Bel'skiy K.S. Fenomenologiya administrativnogo prava. – Smolensk. 1995. S. 111.
Andreevskiy I.E. Politseyskoe pravo. SPb. T.1. Vvedenie i Chast' I. Politsiya bezopasnosti. 1874. S. 1.
Solovey Yu.P. Pravovoe regulirovanie deyatel'nosti militsii v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Omsk, 1993. S. 410.
Kolpakov V.K. K istorii vozniknoveniya i razvitiya obshchestvennykh nachal v upravlenii administrativnoy deliktnosti // Aktual'nye problemy administrativnoy deliktologii. Kiev, 1984. S. 174.
Mel'nik N.G. Prichiny i profilaktika administrativno nakazuemykh narusheniy pasportnoy sistemy // Aktual'nye problemy administrativnoy deliktologii. Kiev, 1984. S. 134.
Remnev V.I. Aktual'nye voprosy administrativnoy deliktologii v sovremennyy period // Aktual'nye problemy administrativnoy deliktologii. Kiev, 1984. S. 6.
Zhigarev E.S. K voprosu o profilaktike administrativnykh prostupkov // Problemy profilaktiki pravonarusheniy v razvitom sotsialisticheskom obshchestve. M., 1982. S. 85.
Lazarev B.M., Lunev A.E. Osnovy zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1981. № 4. S. 25.
Avanesov G.A. Kriminologiya. Prognostika. Upravlenie. Gor'kiy, 1975. S. 102.
Gertsenzon A.A. Teoreticheskie predposylki izucheniya prestupnosti // Voprosy metodiki izucheniya i preduprezhdeniya prestupleniy. M., 1962. S. 512.
Igoshev K.E.; Ustinov V.S. Vvedenie v kurs profilaktiki pravonarusheniy. Gor'kiy, 1973 S. 197.
Lekar' A.G. Osnovnye problemy teorii i praktiki predotvrashcheniya prestupleniy organami okhrany obshchestvennogo poryadka // Trudy Vysshey shkoly MOOP SSSR. M., 1968. Vyp. 21. S. 12
Min'kovskiy G.M., Arzumanyan T.M. i dr. Preduprezhdenie prestupleniy. M., 1962. S. 19.
Dodin E.V. Metodika izucheniya prichin administrativnykh pravonarusheniy // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1983, № 11. S. 30.
Dodin E.V. Administrativnaya deliktologiya v sisteme yuridicheskoy nauki // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1991. № 12. S. 36.
Ostapenko A.I. Administrativnaya deliktnost' v oblasti okhrany obshchestvennogo poryadka i ee profilaktika organami vnutrennikh del: Avtoref. dis... kand. yurid. nauk. Kiev, 1983. S. 14.
Shergin A.P. Administrativno-yurisdiktsionnaya deyatel'nost' organov vnutrennikh del: problemy nauchnogo obespecheniya // Materialy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii 10 aprelya 2000 g. – M., 2000. S. 93.
Genzyuk E.E. Administrativnaya deliktologiya: Dis… d-ra. yurid. nauk. M., 2002. S.29.
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. K voprosu ob osnovanii administrativnoy otvetstvennosti v rossiyskom prave // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 10. - C. 75 - 88. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.10.10153. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_10153.html
Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V., Myshlyaev N.P. Pravovoe regulirovanie deyatel'nosti politsii po profilaktiki pravonarusheniy v zarubezhnykh gosudarstvakh // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2015. - 1. - C. 24 - 34. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2015.1.14255.
Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V., Myshlyaev N.P. K voprosu o prichinakh i usloviyakh administrativnoy deliktnosti // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2015. - 2. - C. 152 - 159. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.2.14281.
Kurakin A.V. Kompetentsiya politsii
v sfere realizatsii zakonodatel'stva
ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 6. - C. 624 - 630. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.06.5.
Kurakin A.V., Badulin A.D., Tregubova E.V. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' za pravonarusheniya na rynke alkogolya i rol' politsii v ee realizatsii // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 10. - C. 28 - 74. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.10.10151. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_10151.html

Reference:

Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V., Myshlyaev N.P.. Forecasting of administrative delinquency and evaluation of its effectiveness in the police activities // Administrative and municipal law. – 2015. – № 5. – P. 473-481. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.5.14999.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.5.14999

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The article focuses on legal and organizational problems related to forecasting of administrative delinquency and evaluation of its effectiveness in the police activities. The object of the article is the range of social relations associated with the forecasting of administrative delinquency. The authors consider the components of the mechanism of forecasting of administrative delinquency and make the proposals for improvement of its effectiveness in the activities of the police. The main attention is paid to the development of the criteria of administrative delinquency forecasting efficiency. The methodology of the research is based on the modern achievements of epistemology. The authors use the general philosophical and theoretical methods (dialectics, the system method, analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, observation, and modeling), the traditional legal methods (formal-logical), and the methods used in special sociological research (the statistical methods, expert evaluations, etc.). In the result of the study of administrative delinquency in the police activities the authors conclude that the abovementioned sphere of internal affairs is not efficient enough. In this regard, at present it is important to develop the legal base for the police activities in the sphere of forecasting of administrative delinquency. The main contribution of the authors is the attention paid to this problem. The novelty of the research lies in the development of the instruments of administrative delinquency forecasting.

Keywords: efficiency,, forecasting,, forecast,, sanction,, punishment,, offence, delinquency, prevention,, police,, criminology.

References:
Kurs sovetskoy kriminologii: preduprezhdenie prestupnosti. M., 1986. S. 122.
Bestuzhev-Lada N.V. Okno v budushchee. Sovremennye problemy sotsial'nogo prognozirovaniya. M., 1970. S. 14.
Lozbyakov V.P. Kriminologiya i administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya militsii. – M., 1996. – S. 46.
Karpets I.I. Predely kriminologicheskikh issledovaniy // Sotsialisticheskaya zakonnost'. 1968, № 9. S. 21.
Sotsial'nye otkloneniya. Vvedenie v obshchuyu teoriyu. M., 1984. S. 212.
Lozbyakov V.P. Lozbyakov V.P. Kriminologiya i administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya militsii. – M., 1996. S. 50.
Dodin E.V. Administrativnaya deliktologiya v sisteme yuridicheskoy nauki // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1991, № 12. S. 35.
Genzyuk E.E. Administrativnaya deliktologiya: Dis…d-ra. yurid. nauk. M., 2002. S. 260.
Volkov M.D., Goryainov K.K., Kondratyuk L.V. Regional'noe kriminologicheskoe prognozirovanie: Ch. 2. M., VNII MVD SSSR, 1980. S. 55.
Effektivnost' truda rukovoditelya. M., 1988.
Zhalinskiy A.E., Kostitskiy M.V. Effektivnost' profilaktiki prestupleniy i kriminologicheskaya informatsiya. L'vov, 1980.
Afanas'ev V.G. Ob intensifikatsii razvitiya sotsialisticheskogo obshchestva. M., 1969. S. 24.
Alekseev S.S. Teoriya prava. Khar'kov. 1994. S. 157.
Remnev V.I. Opredelenie effektivnosti meropriyatiy po nauchnoy organizatsii upravlencheskogo truda // Pravovedenie. 1972. № 3.
Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V., Myshlyaev N.P. Pravovoe regulirovanie deyatel'nosti politsii po profilaktiki pravonarusheniy v zarubezhnykh gosudarstvakh // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2015. - 1. - C. 24 - 34. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2015.1.14255.
Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V., Myshlyaev N.P. K voprosu o prichinakh i usloviyakh administrativnoy deliktnosti // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2015. - 2. - C. 152 - 159. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.2.14281.

References (transliteration):
Kurs sovetskoy kriminologii: preduprezhdenie prestupnosti. M., 1986. S. 122.
Bestuzhev-Lada N.V. Okno v budushchee. Sovremennye problemy sotsial'nogo prognozirovaniya. M., 1970. S. 14.
Lozbyakov V.P. Kriminologiya i administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya militsii. – M., 1996. – S. 46.
Karpets I.I. Predely kriminologicheskikh issledovaniy // Sotsialisticheskaya zakonnost'. 1968, № 9. S. 21.
Sotsial'nye otkloneniya. Vvedenie v obshchuyu teoriyu. M., 1984. S. 212.
Lozbyakov V.P. Lozbyakov V.P. Kriminologiya i administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya militsii. – M., 1996. S. 50.
Dodin E.V. Administrativnaya deliktologiya v sisteme yuridicheskoy nauki // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1991, № 12. S. 35.
Genzyuk E.E. Administrativnaya deliktologiya: Dis…d-ra. yurid. nauk. M., 2002. S. 260.
Volkov M.D., Goryainov K.K., Kondratyuk L.V. Regional'noe kriminologicheskoe prognozirovanie: Ch. 2. M., VNII MVD SSSR, 1980. S. 55.
Effektivnost' truda rukovoditelya. M., 1988.
Zhalinskiy A.E., Kostitskiy M.V. Effektivnost' profilaktiki prestupleniy i kriminologicheskaya informatsiya. L'vov, 1980.
Afanas'ev V.G. Ob intensifikatsii razvitiya sotsialisticheskogo obshchestva. M., 1969. S. 24.
Alekseev S.S. Teoriya prava. Khar'kov. 1994. S. 157.
Remnev V.I. Opredelenie effektivnosti meropriyatiy po nauchnoy organizatsii upravlencheskogo truda // Pravovedenie. 1972. № 3.
Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V., Myshlyaev N.P. Pravovoe regulirovanie deyatel'nosti politsii po profilaktiki pravonarusheniy v zarubezhnykh gosudarstvakh // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2015. - 1. - C. 24 - 34. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2015.1.14255.
Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V., Myshlyaev N.P. K voprosu o prichinakh i usloviyakh administrativnoy deliktnosti // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2015. - 2. - C. 152 - 159. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.2.14281.

Reference:

Titov E.E.. Anti-competitive administrative offences: problems of value definitions use // Administrative and municipal law. – 2015. – № 5. – P. 469-472. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.5.14196.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.5.14196

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The article is devoted to the peculiarities of formulation of a constituent element of administrative anti-competitive offences. The author notes the abundance of value definitions which law enforcers have to use when penalizing for administrative anti-competitive offences. The article reveals and considers the problems of value definitions use and offers the ways of their solution. The author considers the methods defined in the general theory of law which allow the efficient use of value definitions in everyday law enforcement practice of the authorities.The methodology is based on the general scientific methods: deduction, induction, analysis, synthesis, and the special scientific methods: the comparative legal method, the formal logical and the historical-legal method. The author comes to the conclusions:1) the use of value definitions causes difficulties for law enforcement2) in order to use value definitions correctly there should be developed legal guarantees, such as the adjustment of terminology, the establishment of specifications, the development and establishing of the criteria of certain value definitions

Keywords: development of criteria, establishment of specifications, adjustment of terminology, elements of offence, value definitions, anti-competitive administrative offences, competition, antimonopoly law, administrative law, administrative responsibility

References:
Baru M.I. Otsenochnye ponyatiya v trudovom zakonodatel'stve // Sov.gosudarstvo i pravo. 1970
Belyaeva O.M. Ob ispol'zovanii otsenochnykh ponyatiy v zakonodatel'stve i trudnostyakh ikh tolkovaniya v protsesse pravorealizatsii // Istoriya gosudarstva i prava, 2013, N 13.
Kashanina T.V. Otsenochnye ponyatiya v sovetskom prave: dis… kand. yurid. nauk. – Sverdlovsk, 1974.
Levina D.N. Teoreticheskie problemy primeneniya i tolkovaniya otsenochnykh ponyatiy: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. – Nizhniy Novgorod, 2007.
Luk'yanenko M.F. Otsenochnye ponyatiya grazhdanskogo prava: razumnost', dobrosovestnost', sushchestvennost'. M.: Statut, 2010
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 30.06.2011 N 14-P
Ryasina A.S. Otsenochnye kategorii: obshcheteoreticheskiy i nravstvenno-pravovoy aspekty: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. – Saratov, 2013.
Teoriya gosudarstva i prava. Uchebnik / pod red. S.S. Alekseeva 1998.
Fetisov O.E. Otsenochnye ponyatiya v prave: problemy teorii i praktiki: avtoref. dis… kand. yurid. nauk. – Tambov, 2009.
Pisenko K.A. Publichnye sub'ekty konkurentnogo prava
v Rossii i zarubezhnykh stranakh // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya. - 2012. - 2. - C. 60 - 71.

References (transliteration):
Baru M.I. Otsenochnye ponyatiya v trudovom zakonodatel'stve // Sov.gosudarstvo i pravo. 1970
Belyaeva O.M. Ob ispol'zovanii otsenochnykh ponyatiy v zakonodatel'stve i trudnostyakh ikh tolkovaniya v protsesse pravorealizatsii // Istoriya gosudarstva i prava, 2013, N 13.
Kashanina T.V. Otsenochnye ponyatiya v sovetskom prave: dis… kand. yurid. nauk. – Sverdlovsk, 1974.
Levina D.N. Teoreticheskie problemy primeneniya i tolkovaniya otsenochnykh ponyatiy: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. – Nizhniy Novgorod, 2007.
Luk'yanenko M.F. Otsenochnye ponyatiya grazhdanskogo prava: razumnost', dobrosovestnost', sushchestvennost'. M.: Statut, 2010
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 30.06.2011 N 14-P
Ryasina A.S. Otsenochnye kategorii: obshcheteoreticheskiy i nravstvenno-pravovoy aspekty: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. – Saratov, 2013.
Teoriya gosudarstva i prava. Uchebnik / pod red. S.S. Alekseeva 1998.
Fetisov O.E. Otsenochnye ponyatiya v prave: problemy teorii i praktiki: avtoref. dis… kand. yurid. nauk. – Tambov, 2009.
Pisenko K.A. Publichnye sub'ekty konkurentnogo prava
v Rossii i zarubezhnykh stranakh // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya. - 2012. - 2. - C. 60 - 71.

Reference:

Iliy S.K.. Administrative offences of corruption character // Administrative and municipal law. – 2015. – № 5. – P. 460-468. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.5.12588.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.5.12588

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The article considers the problems of administrative responsibility for corruption. The legislation of the Russian Federation in the sphere of administrative offences is one of the key elements in the mechanism of combating corruption. As an administrative offence of corruption character the author understands the action (inaction) of an individual person or a legal entity committed intentionally or due to carelessness with the use of official standing and deviation from rights and duties. In order to reveal corruption crimes in the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation it is supposed to proceed from the presence of: elements of bribery (article 5.16. Bribery of Voters or Participants of a Referendum, article 19.28. Unlawful Remuneration on Behalf of a Legal Entity); use of official standing (Taking Advantage of an Individual's Office or Official Position During an Election Campaign or a Referendum Campaign); violations of norms providing law and order of public management and, among others, aimed at combating corruption (article 19.29. Unlawful Engaging in Labour Activities or in Carrying Out Works and Rendering Services of a State or Municipal Civil Servant or a Former Civil Servant or Municipal Employee). On the basis of these criteria at least 11 articles of the Code should be rated as corruption offences. The author uses the logical and the statistical methods of research, studies analytical documents of the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian Federation, materials of judicial practice. The author offers the definition of administrative offences of corruption character and their list. The article considers some problems appearing in law enforcement practice in the process of qualification of administrative offences specified in art. 19.28, 19.29 of the Code. The author concludes: 1) Elaboration and normative establishing of a range of articles of the Code of Administrative Offences providing the responsibility for corruption offences is urgent; 2) It is reasonable to state article 19.28. in the version which provides not only the responsibilities of legal entities, but also the responsibility of individuals working as entrepreneurs without registration of a legal entity; 3) The possibility should be stipulated to condone the legal entities which actively assist the investigation in case of extortion of a bribe by an official, or if a legal person reported a crime after bribery to the official body: 4) It is necessary to amend the Code of Administrative Offences with the new corpora delicti of administrative offences of corruption character which should provide administrative responsibility for protectionism, intentional provision of unauthentic information about revenue and expenses, entrepreneurship of a public servant, inaction in case of conflict of interest, etc.

Keywords: corruption, administrative offences of corruption character, administrative responsibility, types of corruption offences, enhancement of anticorruption legislation, enhancement of administrative legislation, statistical data, corruption offence, definition of corruption offence, qualification of administration offences

References:
Deyatel'nost' pravookhranitel'nykh organov Rossiyskoy Federatsii po protivodeystviyu korruptsii. Monografiya / pod obshch. red. A.V. Kudashkina. – M.: Akademiya General'noy prokuratury RF, 2011.
Deyatel'nost' prokurorov po privlecheniyu k otvetstvennosti yuridicheskikh lits za korruptsionnye pravonarusheniya. Posobie / avt. kol. pod ruk. S.K. Iliya. – M.: Akad. Gen. prokuratury Ros. Federatsii. 2013.
Informatsionnoe pis'mo upravleniya General'noy prokuratury Rossiyskoy Federatsii v Ural'skom federal'nom okruge ot 20.03.2014 № 33-15-2014 «O praktike privlecheniya k administrativnoy otvetstvennosti po st. 19.28, 19.29 KoAP RF».
Korruptsiya: priroda, proyavleniya, protivodeystvie. Monografiya / otv. red. T.Ya. Khabrieva. – M.: ID «Yurisprudentsiya», 2012.
Korruptsiya v sovremennoy Rossii: problemy teorii i praktiki. Monografiya / pod obshch. red. T.L. Kozlova. – M.: Yurlitinform, 2014.
Obzor sudebnoy praktiki Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii «Obzor sudebnoy praktiki Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii za chetvertyy kvartal 2012 goda».
Plenkin N. Korruptsionnye pravonarusheniya i otvetstvennost' voennosluzhashchikh // ENI "Voennoe pravo". 2013. Vypusk № 4.
Postanovlenie Koordinatsionnogo soveshchaniya rukovoditeley pravookhranitel'nykh organov Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 27.11.2013 № 3 «O sostoyanii i organizatsii raboty pravookhranitel'nykh organov Rossiyskoy Federatsii po vypolneniyu meropriyatiy Natsional'nogo plana protivodeystviya korruptsii na 2012-2013 gody, utverzhdennogo Ukazom Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13.03.2012 № 297».
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 31.03.2011 № 5 «O praktike rassmotreniya sudami del o zashchite izbiratel'nykh prav i prava na uchastie v referendume grazhdan Rossiyskoy Federatsii».
Postanovleniya Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 24.03.2005 № 5 «O nekotorykh voprosakh, voznikayushchikh u sudov pri primenenii Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh».
Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 08.09.2010 № 700 «O poryadke soobshcheniya rabotodatelem pri zaklyuchenii trudovogo dogovora s grazhdaninom, zameshchavshim dolzhnosti gosudarstvennoy ili munitsipal'noy sluzhby, perechen' kotorykh ustanavlivaetsya normativnymi pravovymi aktami Rossiyskoy Federatsii, v techenie 2 let posle ego uvol'neniya s gosudarstvennoy ili munitsipal'noy sluzhby o zaklyuchenii takogo dogovora predstavitelyu nanimatelya (rabotodatelyu) gosudarstvennogo ili munitsipal'nogo sluzhashchego po poslednemu mestu ego sluzhby».
Prikaz General'nogo prokurora Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 15.05.2010 № 209 «Ob usilenii prokurorskogo nadzora v svete realizatsii Natsional'noy strategii protivodeystviya korruptsii».
Rostovtseva Yu.V. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' za korruptsionnye pravonarusheniya v sisteme gosudarstvennoy sluzhby // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2012. № 3.
Sootvetstvie rossiyskogo zakonodatel'stva trebovaniyam mezhdunarodnoy organizatsii truda. Analiticheskiy obzor, podgotovlennyy dlya sistemy Konsul'tantPlyus, 2014 (otv. red. L.A. Chikanova).
Ukazanie General'noy prokuratury i MVD Rossii ot 11.09.2013 № 387-11/2 «O vvedenii v deystvie Perechney statey Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii, ispol'zuemykh pri formirovanii statisticheskoy otchetnosti».
Federal'nyy zakon ot 04.05.2011 № 97-FZ «O vnesenii izmeneniy v Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii i Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v svyazi s sovershenstvovaniem gosudarstvennogo upravleniya v oblasti protivodeystviya korruptsii».
Federal'nyy zakon ot 25.12.2008 № 273-FZ «O protivodeystvii korruptsii».
Ramazanov R.U. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' za korruptsionnye pravonarusheniya. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2011. - 3. - C. 70 - 73.
But S.S. Sistema administrativno-pravovykh sredstv
protivodeystviya korruptsii
v tamozhennykh organakh
Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 8. - C. 8221 - 824. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.8.9317.
Shchedrin N.V. O korruptsii, korruptsionerakh i korruptsionnoy vygode // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2014. - 3. - C. 12 - 27. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2014.3.10983. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_10983.html
Dobrobaba M.B. Problema poiska fakticheskikh osnovaniy
distsiplinarnoy otvetstvennosti
gosudarstvennykh sluzhashchikh // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 6. - C. 631 - 640. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.06.6.
Andrushchak O.L. Problemy administrativnoy otvetstvennosti
yuridicheskikh lits za pravonarusheniya
na rynke aktsiy Ukrainy // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya. - 2013. - 3. - C. 520 - 525.
V.D. Plesovskikh Tendentsii razvitiya federal'nogo administrativno-
deliktnogo prava i zakonodatel'stva // Pravo i politika. - 2012. - 12. - C. 1990 - 1994.
Redkous V.M. Administrativno-pravovoe regulirovanie protivodeystviya korruptsii na Ukraine // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2010. - 7. - C. 39 - 45.
Redkous V.M. Administrativno-pravovoe regulirovanie protivodeystviya korruptsii v gosudarstvakh-uchastnikakh Sodruzhestva Nezavisimykh Gosudarstv // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2010. - 5. - C. 21 - 27.
M. B. Razgil'dieva Teoreticheskie problemy
byudzhetno-pravovoy otvetstvennosti // Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie. - 2013. - 2. - C. 102 - 118. DOI: 10.7256/2310-0508.2013.2.9876.
S.E. Naryshkin, T.Ya. Khabrieva Mekhanizm otsenki antikorruptsionnykh
standartov GREKO (sravnitel'no-
pravovoe issledovanie) // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya. - 2011. - 3. - C. 4 - 10.

References (transliteration):
Deyatel'nost' pravookhranitel'nykh organov Rossiyskoy Federatsii po protivodeystviyu korruptsii. Monografiya / pod obshch. red. A.V. Kudashkina. – M.: Akademiya General'noy prokuratury RF, 2011.
Deyatel'nost' prokurorov po privlecheniyu k otvetstvennosti yuridicheskikh lits za korruptsionnye pravonarusheniya. Posobie / avt. kol. pod ruk. S.K. Iliya. – M.: Akad. Gen. prokuratury Ros. Federatsii. 2013.
Informatsionnoe pis'mo upravleniya General'noy prokuratury Rossiyskoy Federatsii v Ural'skom federal'nom okruge ot 20.03.2014 № 33-15-2014 «O praktike privlecheniya k administrativnoy otvetstvennosti po st. 19.28, 19.29 KoAP RF».
Korruptsiya: priroda, proyavleniya, protivodeystvie. Monografiya / otv. red. T.Ya. Khabrieva. – M.: ID «Yurisprudentsiya», 2012.
Korruptsiya v sovremennoy Rossii: problemy teorii i praktiki. Monografiya / pod obshch. red. T.L. Kozlova. – M.: Yurlitinform, 2014.
Obzor sudebnoy praktiki Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii «Obzor sudebnoy praktiki Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii za chetvertyy kvartal 2012 goda».
Plenkin N. Korruptsionnye pravonarusheniya i otvetstvennost' voennosluzhashchikh // ENI "Voennoe pravo". 2013. Vypusk № 4.
Postanovlenie Koordinatsionnogo soveshchaniya rukovoditeley pravookhranitel'nykh organov Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 27.11.2013 № 3 «O sostoyanii i organizatsii raboty pravookhranitel'nykh organov Rossiyskoy Federatsii po vypolneniyu meropriyatiy Natsional'nogo plana protivodeystviya korruptsii na 2012-2013 gody, utverzhdennogo Ukazom Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13.03.2012 № 297».
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 31.03.2011 № 5 «O praktike rassmotreniya sudami del o zashchite izbiratel'nykh prav i prava na uchastie v referendume grazhdan Rossiyskoy Federatsii».
Postanovleniya Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 24.03.2005 № 5 «O nekotorykh voprosakh, voznikayushchikh u sudov pri primenenii Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh».
Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 08.09.2010 № 700 «O poryadke soobshcheniya rabotodatelem pri zaklyuchenii trudovogo dogovora s grazhdaninom, zameshchavshim dolzhnosti gosudarstvennoy ili munitsipal'noy sluzhby, perechen' kotorykh ustanavlivaetsya normativnymi pravovymi aktami Rossiyskoy Federatsii, v techenie 2 let posle ego uvol'neniya s gosudarstvennoy ili munitsipal'noy sluzhby o zaklyuchenii takogo dogovora predstavitelyu nanimatelya (rabotodatelyu) gosudarstvennogo ili munitsipal'nogo sluzhashchego po poslednemu mestu ego sluzhby».
Prikaz General'nogo prokurora Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 15.05.2010 № 209 «Ob usilenii prokurorskogo nadzora v svete realizatsii Natsional'noy strategii protivodeystviya korruptsii».
Rostovtseva Yu.V. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' za korruptsionnye pravonarusheniya v sisteme gosudarstvennoy sluzhby // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2012. № 3.
Sootvetstvie rossiyskogo zakonodatel'stva trebovaniyam mezhdunarodnoy organizatsii truda. Analiticheskiy obzor, podgotovlennyy dlya sistemy Konsul'tantPlyus, 2014 (otv. red. L.A. Chikanova).
Ukazanie General'noy prokuratury i MVD Rossii ot 11.09.2013 № 387-11/2 «O vvedenii v deystvie Perechney statey Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii, ispol'zuemykh pri formirovanii statisticheskoy otchetnosti».
Federal'nyy zakon ot 04.05.2011 № 97-FZ «O vnesenii izmeneniy v Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii i Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v svyazi s sovershenstvovaniem gosudarstvennogo upravleniya v oblasti protivodeystviya korruptsii».
Federal'nyy zakon ot 25.12.2008 № 273-FZ «O protivodeystvii korruptsii».
Ramazanov R.U. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' za korruptsionnye pravonarusheniya. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2011. - 3. - C. 70 - 73.
But S.S. Sistema administrativno-pravovykh sredstv
protivodeystviya korruptsii
v tamozhennykh organakh
Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 8. - C. 8221 - 824. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.8.9317.
Shchedrin N.V. O korruptsii, korruptsionerakh i korruptsionnoy vygode // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2014. - 3. - C. 12 - 27. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2014.3.10983. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_10983.html
Dobrobaba M.B. Problema poiska fakticheskikh osnovaniy
distsiplinarnoy otvetstvennosti
gosudarstvennykh sluzhashchikh // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 6. - C. 631 - 640. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.06.6.
Andrushchak O.L. Problemy administrativnoy otvetstvennosti
yuridicheskikh lits za pravonarusheniya
na rynke aktsiy Ukrainy // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya. - 2013. - 3. - C. 520 - 525.
V.D. Plesovskikh Tendentsii razvitiya federal'nogo administrativno-
deliktnogo prava i zakonodatel'stva // Pravo i politika. - 2012. - 12. - C. 1990 - 1994.
Redkous V.M. Administrativno-pravovoe regulirovanie protivodeystviya korruptsii na Ukraine // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2010. - 7. - C. 39 - 45.
Redkous V.M. Administrativno-pravovoe regulirovanie protivodeystviya korruptsii v gosudarstvakh-uchastnikakh Sodruzhestva Nezavisimykh Gosudarstv // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2010. - 5. - C. 21 - 27.
M. B. Razgil'dieva Teoreticheskie problemy
byudzhetno-pravovoy otvetstvennosti // Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie. - 2013. - 2. - C. 102 - 118. DOI: 10.7256/2310-0508.2013.2.9876.
S.E. Naryshkin, T.Ya. Khabrieva Mekhanizm otsenki antikorruptsionnykh
standartov GREKO (sravnitel'no-
pravovoe issledovanie) // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya. - 2011. - 3. - C. 4 - 10.

Reference:

Sizov I.Yu.. Administrative responsibility of legal entities for the violation of migration laws // Administrative and municipal law. – 2015. – № 5. – P. 455-459. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.5.14366.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.5.14366

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The article is devoted to the study of the peculiarities of imposition of administrative responsibility for the violation of migration laws on legal entities. The author considers the issues of infliction of punishment lower than the lowest limit stated in the corresponding article, and the peculiarities of responsibility in case of a belated notification about the conclusion of a labour contract with a foreign national. The article considers a range of changes which came into effect in the late 2014, and which relate to the enforcement of responsibility of legal entities for the violation of migration laws. The methodology of the research is based on the modern achievements of epistemology. The author uses the theoretical and the general philosophical methods (dialectics, the system approach, analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, observation, and modeling), the traditional legal methods (formal logical), and the methods used in special sociological research (the statistical method, expert evaluations, etc.). Administrative-legal regulation of migration of the population is one of the urgent problems in the sphere of state management for the following reasons: demographical problems, and insufficient theoretical study of the role and the importance of migration process in demographical development of the Russian Federation. These and other problems provoke a wide range of negative consequences in the sphere of enforcement of law and socio-economic development of the country. Every year illegal migration attracts more and more attention of public authorities. Annually the government considers the problems of migration in different contexts, defines the quotas of foreign labour use in the Russian Federation, and solves other problems in the sphere of migration policy. But despite the measures taken, the global problems in the sphere of migration policy haven’t been solved yet.

Keywords: responsibility, migration, the Federal Migration Service , punishment, sanction, entity, foreign national, deportation, exclusion, fine

References:
Kurakin A.V. Inostrannye grazhdane i litsa bez grazhdanstva kak sub'ekty administrativnogo prava Rossii // Gosudarstvo i pravo. – 2001. – № 6.
Kurakin A.V. Kontrol' organov vnutrennikh del za soblyudeniem pravil prebyvaniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii inostrannykh grazhdan i lits bez grazhdanstva. – M., 2002.
Oblezova (Kharitonova) A.O. Novoe v migratsionnom zakonodatel'stve: vvedenie otvetstvennosti za neprinyatie priglashayushchey storonoy mer po obespecheniyu priglashennogo inostrannogo grazhdanina // Migratsionnoe pravo. – 2013. – № 1.
Kurakin A.V. Kompetentsiya politsii v sfere realizatsii zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 28 - 48. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.4.8841. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8841.html
Sizov I.Yu. Problemy informatsionnogo obespecheniya
deyatel'nosti organov vnutrennikh del
pri protivodeystvii migratsionnoy
prestupnosti // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2012. - 1. - C. 26 - 30.
Klepikov S.N., Klepikova O.S. Administrativno-deliktnaya politika Rossiyskoy Federatsii i printsipy ustanovleniya administrativnoy otvetstvennosti // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2014. - 8. - C. 801 - 806. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.8.11432.
Agapov A.B. Publichnoe prinuzhdenie
ili obshchestvennaya sanatsiya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 7. - C. 743 - 752. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.7.9037.
O. L. Dubovik Ugolovno-pravovoe vozdeystvie v otnoshenii yuridicheskikh lits: sravnitel'nyy analiz mezhdunarodnogo, evropeyskogo, nemetskogo i rossiyskogo prava // Pravo i politika. - 2012. - 8. - C. 1448 - 1452.

References (transliteration):
Kurakin A.V. Inostrannye grazhdane i litsa bez grazhdanstva kak sub'ekty administrativnogo prava Rossii // Gosudarstvo i pravo. – 2001. – № 6.
Kurakin A.V. Kontrol' organov vnutrennikh del za soblyudeniem pravil prebyvaniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii inostrannykh grazhdan i lits bez grazhdanstva. – M., 2002.
Oblezova (Kharitonova) A.O. Novoe v migratsionnom zakonodatel'stve: vvedenie otvetstvennosti za neprinyatie priglashayushchey storonoy mer po obespecheniyu priglashennogo inostrannogo grazhdanina // Migratsionnoe pravo. – 2013. – № 1.
Kurakin A.V. Kompetentsiya politsii v sfere realizatsii zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 28 - 48. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.4.8841. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8841.html
Sizov I.Yu. Problemy informatsionnogo obespecheniya
deyatel'nosti organov vnutrennikh del
pri protivodeystvii migratsionnoy
prestupnosti // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2012. - 1. - C. 26 - 30.
Klepikov S.N., Klepikova O.S. Administrativno-deliktnaya politika Rossiyskoy Federatsii i printsipy ustanovleniya administrativnoy otvetstvennosti // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2014. - 8. - C. 801 - 806. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.8.11432.
Agapov A.B. Publichnoe prinuzhdenie
ili obshchestvennaya sanatsiya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 7. - C. 743 - 752. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.7.9037.
O. L. Dubovik Ugolovno-pravovoe vozdeystvie v otnoshenii yuridicheskikh lits: sravnitel'nyy analiz mezhdunarodnogo, evropeyskogo, nemetskogo i rossiyskogo prava // Pravo i politika. - 2012. - 8. - C. 1448 - 1452.

Reference:

Kretov V.V., Sevryugin V.E.. On the necessity of establishing of administrative responsibility for offences in the sphere of road economy of the Russian Federation // Administrative and municipal law. – 2015. – № 4. – P. 380-387. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.4.14614.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.4.14614

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The article analyzes the provisions of the Federal law "On automobile roads and road activities" and Code of the Russian Federation "On administrative offences" regarding imposition of administrative responsibility for both road users (individuals and legal entities) and officers of the traffic control sector for violations in repair, roads maintenance and safety. The authors propose the measures for improvement of the legislation on administrative offences, including toughening of responsibility and introduction of additional chapter in the Special part of the administrative code. The authors use the system, the comparative legal and the formal logical methods. The improvement of the Code Of The Russian Federation "On administrative offences" and the Federal law "On automobile roads and road activities.." No. 257-FL dated 8.11.2007 through the inclusion of new rules on liability in the sphere of roads and road-related activities, will allow not only to improve the responsibility system of road users and organizations involved in the operation of roads, but also to codify the responsibilities of road management, as well as their managers.

Keywords: officials, road users, administrative offences, road legislation, administrative responsibility, road activities, roads, administrative fine, individuals, legal entities

References:
Kheggie I., Viskers P. Upravlenie i finiansirovanie avtomobil'nykh dorog v rynochnykh usloviyakh/ Perevod pod red. prof. V.V. Sel'yanova – M.: MADI(TU),1999.-174s.
Otchet «Analiz zarubezhnogo dorozhnogo zakonodatel'stva».-M.: Rosdornii.-2003g.-270 s.
Dorozhnoe khozyaystvo Rossii tsifry i fakty.-M.:Rosavtodor,2011g.-279 s.
Shumeyko A.N., Yurkovskiy I.N., M.V. Nemchinov Avtomobil'nye dorogi Rossii. Sostoyanie i perspektiva.-M.: Molodaya gvardiya, 2007.-275s.
Transport Rossii №43 26.11 – 2.12. 2012g

References (transliteration):
Kheggie I., Viskers P. Upravlenie i finiansirovanie avtomobil'nykh dorog v rynochnykh usloviyakh/ Perevod pod red. prof. V.V. Sel'yanova – M.: MADI(TU),1999.-174s.
Otchet «Analiz zarubezhnogo dorozhnogo zakonodatel'stva».-M.: Rosdornii.-2003g.-270 s.
Dorozhnoe khozyaystvo Rossii tsifry i fakty.-M.:Rosavtodor,2011g.-279 s.
Shumeyko A.N., Yurkovskiy I.N., M.V. Nemchinov Avtomobil'nye dorogi Rossii. Sostoyanie i perspektiva.-M.: Molodaya gvardiya, 2007.-275s.
Transport Rossii №43 26.11 – 2.12. 2012g

Reference:

Dresvyannikova E.A.. Correct qualification of administrative offence as a component of the principle of unavoidability of punishment // Administrative and municipal law. – 2015. – № 4. – P. 375-379. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.4.13159.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.4.13159

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The subject of the research is qualification of administrative offences specified in the articles 12.6 and 12.23 part 3 of the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation. Implementation of the principle of unavoidability of punishment means the correct qualification of the offence committed. Unfortunately, when qualifying administrative offences in the sphere of road traffic a law enforcer sometimes faces the situation when one deed refers to several competing administrative-legal regulations. Regulations provide for various types of responsibility for transportation of children without a safety belt. In such situations the correct qualification of this deed is necessary for the correct legal treatment of the deed and imposition of a corresponding punishment. The author of the article considers the problem of correlation between the rules of transportation of children (article 12.23 part 3 of the Code of Administrative Offences) and the rules of safety belts use (article 12.6 of the Code) as competing legal regulations in the sphere of road traffic. The correct qualification of administrative offences fosters the respect for law enforcement bodies in citizens and promotes the increase of legal sense and legal culture of road traffic participants. The author uses general scientific methods (analysis, synthesis, the comparative method) and special research methods. The analysis of the administrative legislation and the court and law enforcement practice shows the need for the general explanation by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of the order of application of the rules of children transportation (article 12.23, part 3 of the Code of Administrative Offences) and the rules of safety belts use (article 12.6 of the Code). It is necessary to amend the general part of the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation with the regulation explaining the order of the general and the special norms of the Special Part application.

Keywords: offence, qualification, regulation, competition, principle, unavoidability, punishment, legal sense, law enforcement, court practice

References:
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30 dekabrya 2001 g. № 195-FZ (red. ot 21.07.2014 g.) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. – 2002. – № 1 (chast' I). – St. 1.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13 iyunya 1996 g. № 63-FZ (red. ot 21.07.2014 g.) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. – 1996. – № 25. – Ct. 2954.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 23.07.2013 g. № 196-FZ «O vnesenii izmeneniy v Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh i stat'yu 28 Federal'nogo zakona «O bezopasnosti dorozhnogo dvizheniya» // Rossiyskaya gazeta. – 2013. – № 161. – 25 iyulya.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Obshchaya teoriya kvalifikatsii prestupleniy. – M. – Yurist'. – 2007. – ISBN: 5797501708.
Ozhegov S. I., Shvedova N. Yu. Tolkovyy slovar' russkogo yazyka: 80 000 slov i frazeologicheskikh vyrazheniy // Rossiyskaya akademiya nauk. Institut russkogo yazyka im. V. V. Vinogradova. – 4-e izd., dopolnennoe. – M.: Azbukovnik, 1999. – 944 s. – ISBN 5-89285-003-X.
Rogova N. N. Osobennosti kvalifikatsii prestupleniy pri konkurentsii ugolovno-pravovykh norm // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. – 2011-№23.-S.22-25.
Internet resurs: http://dogovor-urist.ru.
Internet resurs: http:// newpraktika.org/praktika/65-sudy_permskogo_kraya/9556-reshenie_permskogo_kraevogo_suda_po_delu_n_7-65-2010.html.
Internet resurs: http://ria.ru/society/20120614/673315071.html.
Ofitsial'nyy sayt Gosavtoinspektsii MVD Rossii: htpp:// www.gibdd.ru
V.D. Plesovskikh Tendentsii razvitiya federal'nogo administrativno-
deliktnogo prava i zakonodatel'stva // Pravo i politika. - 2012. - 12. - C. 1990 - 1994.

References (transliteration):
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30 dekabrya 2001 g. № 195-FZ (red. ot 21.07.2014 g.) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. – 2002. – № 1 (chast' I). – St. 1.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13 iyunya 1996 g. № 63-FZ (red. ot 21.07.2014 g.) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. – 1996. – № 25. – Ct. 2954.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 23.07.2013 g. № 196-FZ «O vnesenii izmeneniy v Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh i stat'yu 28 Federal'nogo zakona «O bezopasnosti dorozhnogo dvizheniya» // Rossiyskaya gazeta. – 2013. – № 161. – 25 iyulya.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Obshchaya teoriya kvalifikatsii prestupleniy. – M. – Yurist'. – 2007. – ISBN: 5797501708.
Ozhegov S. I., Shvedova N. Yu. Tolkovyy slovar' russkogo yazyka: 80 000 slov i frazeologicheskikh vyrazheniy // Rossiyskaya akademiya nauk. Institut russkogo yazyka im. V. V. Vinogradova. – 4-e izd., dopolnennoe. – M.: Azbukovnik, 1999. – 944 s. – ISBN 5-89285-003-X.
Rogova N. N. Osobennosti kvalifikatsii prestupleniy pri konkurentsii ugolovno-pravovykh norm // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. – 2011-№23.-S.22-25.
Internet resurs: http://dogovor-urist.ru.
Internet resurs: http:// newpraktika.org/praktika/65-sudy_permskogo_kraya/9556-reshenie_permskogo_kraevogo_suda_po_delu_n_7-65-2010.html.
Internet resurs: http://ria.ru/society/20120614/673315071.html.
Ofitsial'nyy sayt Gosavtoinspektsii MVD Rossii: htpp:// www.gibdd.ru
V.D. Plesovskikh Tendentsii razvitiya federal'nogo administrativno-
deliktnogo prava i zakonodatel'stva // Pravo i politika. - 2012. - 12. - C. 1990 - 1994.

Reference:

Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V., Badulin A.D., Tregubova E.V., Kareeva-Popelkovskaya K.A.. Problems of administrative responsibility application in cases of violation of legislation in the sphere of state regulation of spirituous and alcohol-containing production // Administrative and municipal law. – 2015. – № 3. – P. 275-282. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.3.13849.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.3.13849

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The subject of the research is the complex of problems of a scientific and practical character connected with the application of measures of administrative responsibility for the offences in the sphere of production and distribution of ethyl alcohol, spirituous and alcohol-containing production. The object of the research includes public relations appearing in the process of administrative measures application for the offences in the sphere of production and distribution of ethyl alcohol, spirituous and alcohol-containing production. The authors pay special attention to the content and the principles of administrative responsibility in the sphere in question and formulate the suggestions about the enhancement of its realization. The methodology of the research is based on the up-to-date achievements of epistemology. The authors use the theoretical and the general philosophical methods (dialectics, the system method, analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, observation, modeling), the traditional legal methods (the formal logical) and the methods used in special sociological research (the statistical method, expert evaluations, etc). The article explains the necessity of extension of protective effect of administrative responsibility measures applied for the violation of order of production and distribution of ethyl alcohol, spirituous and alcohol-containing production, reveals the material and procedural components of administrative responsibility in this sphere. The study theoretically substantiates and reveals the mechanism of administrative measures realization in the sphere of production and distribution of ethyl alcohol, spirituous and alcohol-containing production. Moreover, the authors come to the conclusion about the necessity of inclusion of licence abolition as an administrative punishment for the offences in the sphere of production and distribution of ethyl alcohol, spirituous and alcohol-containing production.

Keywords: alcohol, spirit, responsibility, punishment, fine, police, coercion, control, distribution, production

References:
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. Aktual'nye problemy administrativnogo prava. – M., 2013.
Badulin A.D. Institut administrativnoy otvetstvennosti i ego realizatsiya v sfere proizvodstva i oborota alkogol'noy i spirtosoderzhashchey produktsii // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 49 - 70. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.4.8830. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8830.html
Kurakin A.V., Badulin A.D., Tregubova E.V. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' za pravonarusheniya na rynke alkogolya i rol' politsii v ee realizatsii // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 10. - C. 28 - 74. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.10.10151. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_10151.html
Kurakin A.V. Kompetentsiya politsii v sfere realizatsii zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 28 - 48. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.4.8841. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8841.html
Badulin A.D., Kurakin A.V., Tregubova E.V. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost'
za pravonarusheniya
na rynke alkogolya
i rol' politsii v ee realizatsii // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2013. - 4. - C. 227 - 244. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.4.9438.
Kurakin A.V., Badulin A.D. Problemy realizatsii mer administrativnoy otvetstvennosti v sfere proizvodstva i oborota etilovogo spirta, alkogol'noy i spirtosoderzhashchey produktsii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2012. - 6. - C. 59 - 66.
Kurakin A.V., Badulin A.D. Administrativnye problemy realizatsii mer otvetstvennosti za proizvodstvo i realizatsiyu alkogol'noy i spirtsoderzhashchey produktsii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2012. - 7. - C. 59 - 65.
Kareeva-Popelkovskaya K.A. Mery administrativnogo presecheniya i problemy ikh realizatsii v deyatel'nosti politsii // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2013. - 6. - C. 390 - 401. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.6.10597.

References (transliteration):
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. Aktual'nye problemy administrativnogo prava. – M., 2013.
Badulin A.D. Institut administrativnoy otvetstvennosti i ego realizatsiya v sfere proizvodstva i oborota alkogol'noy i spirtosoderzhashchey produktsii // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 49 - 70. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.4.8830. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8830.html
Kurakin A.V., Badulin A.D., Tregubova E.V. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' za pravonarusheniya na rynke alkogolya i rol' politsii v ee realizatsii // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 10. - C. 28 - 74. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.10.10151. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_10151.html
Kurakin A.V. Kompetentsiya politsii v sfere realizatsii zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 28 - 48. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.4.8841. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8841.html
Badulin A.D., Kurakin A.V., Tregubova E.V. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost'
za pravonarusheniya
na rynke alkogolya
i rol' politsii v ee realizatsii // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2013. - 4. - C. 227 - 244. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.4.9438.
Kurakin A.V., Badulin A.D. Problemy realizatsii mer administrativnoy otvetstvennosti v sfere proizvodstva i oborota etilovogo spirta, alkogol'noy i spirtosoderzhashchey produktsii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2012. - 6. - C. 59 - 66.
Kurakin A.V., Badulin A.D. Administrativnye problemy realizatsii mer otvetstvennosti za proizvodstvo i realizatsiyu alkogol'noy i spirtsoderzhashchey produktsii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2012. - 7. - C. 59 - 65.
Kareeva-Popelkovskaya K.A. Mery administrativnogo presecheniya i problemy ikh realizatsii v deyatel'nosti politsii // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2013. - 6. - C. 390 - 401. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.6.10597.

Reference:

Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V., Myshlyaev N.P.. On the issue of the reasons and the conditions of administrative delicts // Administrative and municipal law. – 2015. – № 2. – P. 152-159. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.2.14281.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.2.14281

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: 1. The subject of the article includes legal and organizational problems of revelation of causes and conditions of administrative delicts. The object of the article is a range of public relations in the sphere of prevention and prophylaxis of administrative offences. The authors pay special attention to the forms and methods of activities of state power and administration bodies aimed at the prevention of administrative offences. Special attention is paid to the theory of this problem; the article formulates the proposals about the improvement of the legislation in the sphere of administrative offences. Also, special attention is concentrated on the logical connection of administrative offences and criminal delicts. 2. The methodology of the research is based on the up-to-date achievements of epistemology. The authors use the general philosophical, theoretical methods (dialectics, the system method, analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, observation), the traditional legal methods, and the methods used in specific sociological researches. 3. The main conclusions of the research relate to the improvement of the legislation on administrative offences. The originality of this paper consists in the fact that it presents a comprehensive evaluation of public authorities' activities in the sphere of offences prevention; substantiates the use of the system approach in the sphere of crimes and administrative offences prevention. The specific contribution of the article consists in the conclusion that the achievement of significant results in provision of the rule of law and protection of the rights of citizens from various illegal encroachments is possible only on the basis of a complex approach to crime prevention.

References:
Kurakin A.V. Kompetentsiya politsii v sfere realizatsii zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya.-2013.-4.-C. 28-48. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.4.8841. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8841.html
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. K voprosu ob osnovanii administrativnoy otvetstvennosti v rossiyskom prave // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya.-2013.-10.-C. 75-88. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.10.10153. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_10153.html
Romanov G.A. Informatsionnoe obespechenie upravleniya profilakticheskoy deyatel'nost'yu organov vnutrennikh del // Profilaktika pravonarusheniy. – M., 1980. Vyp. 11. – S. 15.
Antonyan Yu.M. Rol' konkretnoy zhiznennoy situatsii v sovershenii prestupleniya. – M., 1973.
Mel'nik N.G. Prichiny i profilaktika administrativno-nakazuemykh narusheniy pasportnoy sistemy // Administrativno-deliktnye otnosheniya. Kiev, 1979. –S. 132.
Mel'nik N.G. Prichiny i profilaktika administrativno-nakazuemykh narusheniy pasportnoy sistemy // Administrativno-deliktnye otnosheniya. Kiev, 1979. –S. 134.
Remnev V.I. Aktual'nye voprosy administrativnoy deliktologii v sovremennyy period // Aktual'nye problemy administrativnoy deliktologii. –Kiev, 1984. – S. 13.
Remnev V.I. Aktual'nye voprosy administrativnoy deliktologii v sovremennyy period // Aktual'nye problemy administrativnoy deliktologii. –Kiev, 1984. – S. 13.
Mel'nik N.G. Prichiny i profilaktika administrativno-nakazuemykh narusheniy pasportnoy sistemy // Administrativno-deliktnye otnosheniya. Kiev, 1979. –S. 131.
Stolbovoy A.P. Administrativno-predupreditel'nye mery militsii kak sredstvo bor'by s pravonarusheniyami v usloviyakh razvitogo sotsializma: Avtoref. diss…kand. yurid. nauk. – Kiev, 1984. – S. 7.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Prichiny pravonarusheniy. – M., 1976.
Bilyalov A.K. Ob opredelenii kategoriy «osnova» i «osnovanie» // Filosofskie nauki. – 1976. – № 5. – S. 142.
Kerimov D.A. Metodologiya prava (predmet, funktsii, problemy filosofii prava) / 2-e izd.-M.: Avanta+, 2001. – S. 91.
Filimonov V.D. Kriminologicheskie osnovy ugolovnogo prava. – Tomsk: Tomskiy universitet. 1981. – S. 22.
Gertsenzon A.A. Vvedenie v sovetskuyu kriminologiyu. – M., 1965. – S. 136.
Karpets I.I. Problemy prestupnosti. – M., 1969. – S. 69.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Prichinnost' v kriminologii. – M., 1968. – S. 10.
Sakharov A.B. O lichnosti prestupnika i prichinakh prestupnosti v SSSR. – M., 1961. – S. 58.
Antonyan Yu.M. Sotsial'naya sreda i formirovanie lichnosti prestupnika. – M., 1975. – S. 5.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Kontseptual'nye osnovy profilaktiki pravonarusheniy // Materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii po probleme profilaktiki pravonarusheniy. – M., 1997. – S. 10.
Filosofskaya entsiklopediya. – M., 1960. T. 1. – S. 206.
Kobzar' I.A. Sotsial'naya i kriminologicheskaya obuslovlennost' ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti nesovershennoletnikh (teoriya i praktika). – M., 1998. – S. 36.
Filosofskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar'. – M., 1983. – S. 707.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Prichiny pravonarusheniy. – M., 1976. –S. 18.
Avanesov G.A. Teoriya i metodologiya kriminologicheskogo prognozirovaniya. –M., 1972. – S. 218.
Kuznetsova N.F. Kriminologiya kak nauka // Sovetskaya yustitsiya. 1970, № 2. S. 8.
Goryainov K.K. Kriminologicheskaya obstanovka (metodologicheskie aspekty). – M.: VNII MVD SSSR. 1991. – S. 21.
Goryainov K.K. Kriminologicheskaya obstanovka (metodologicheskie aspekty). – M.: VNII MVD SSSR. 1991. – S. 24.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Prichiny pravonarusheniy. – M., 1976. – S. 126.
Petrunina I.K. K voprosu o prichinakh administrativnykh pravonarusheniy v torgovle // Aktual'nye problemy administrativnoy deliktologii. – Kiev, 1984. – S. 84.
Petrunina I.K. K voprosu o prichinakh administrativnykh pravonarusheniy v torgovle // Aktual'nye problemy administrativnoy deliktologii. – Kiev, 1984. – S. 84.
Karpets I.I. Prestupnost' kak real'nost' // Voprosy filosofii. – 1989. – № 5. – S. 97.
Lazarev B.M., Lunev A.E. Osnovy zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. – 1981. – № 4. – S. 25.
Lozbyakov V.P. Kriminologicheskie osnovy administrativno-yurisdiktsionnoy deyatel'nosti rossiyskoy militsii: Dis… d-ra. yurid. nauk. M., 1995.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Prichiny pravonarusheniy. – M., 1976. – S. 8.
Stolbovoy A.P. Administrativno-predupreditel'nye mery militsii kak sredstvo bor'by s pravonarusheniyami v usloviyakh razvitogo sotsializma: Avtoref. diss…kand. yurid. nauk. – Kiev, 1984. – S. 8.

References (transliteration):
Kurakin A.V. Kompetentsiya politsii v sfere realizatsii zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya.-2013.-4.-C. 28-48. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.4.8841. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8841.html
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. K voprosu ob osnovanii administrativnoy otvetstvennosti v rossiyskom prave // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya.-2013.-10.-C. 75-88. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.10.10153. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_10153.html
Romanov G.A. Informatsionnoe obespechenie upravleniya profilakticheskoy deyatel'nost'yu organov vnutrennikh del // Profilaktika pravonarusheniy. – M., 1980. Vyp. 11. – S. 15.
Antonyan Yu.M. Rol' konkretnoy zhiznennoy situatsii v sovershenii prestupleniya. – M., 1973.
Mel'nik N.G. Prichiny i profilaktika administrativno-nakazuemykh narusheniy pasportnoy sistemy // Administrativno-deliktnye otnosheniya. Kiev, 1979. –S. 132.
Mel'nik N.G. Prichiny i profilaktika administrativno-nakazuemykh narusheniy pasportnoy sistemy // Administrativno-deliktnye otnosheniya. Kiev, 1979. –S. 134.
Remnev V.I. Aktual'nye voprosy administrativnoy deliktologii v sovremennyy period // Aktual'nye problemy administrativnoy deliktologii. –Kiev, 1984. – S. 13.
Remnev V.I. Aktual'nye voprosy administrativnoy deliktologii v sovremennyy period // Aktual'nye problemy administrativnoy deliktologii. –Kiev, 1984. – S. 13.
Mel'nik N.G. Prichiny i profilaktika administrativno-nakazuemykh narusheniy pasportnoy sistemy // Administrativno-deliktnye otnosheniya. Kiev, 1979. –S. 131.
Stolbovoy A.P. Administrativno-predupreditel'nye mery militsii kak sredstvo bor'by s pravonarusheniyami v usloviyakh razvitogo sotsializma: Avtoref. diss…kand. yurid. nauk. – Kiev, 1984. – S. 7.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Prichiny pravonarusheniy. – M., 1976.
Bilyalov A.K. Ob opredelenii kategoriy «osnova» i «osnovanie» // Filosofskie nauki. – 1976. – № 5. – S. 142.
Kerimov D.A. Metodologiya prava (predmet, funktsii, problemy filosofii prava) / 2-e izd.-M.: Avanta+, 2001. – S. 91.
Filimonov V.D. Kriminologicheskie osnovy ugolovnogo prava. – Tomsk: Tomskiy universitet. 1981. – S. 22.
Gertsenzon A.A. Vvedenie v sovetskuyu kriminologiyu. – M., 1965. – S. 136.
Karpets I.I. Problemy prestupnosti. – M., 1969. – S. 69.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Prichinnost' v kriminologii. – M., 1968. – S. 10.
Sakharov A.B. O lichnosti prestupnika i prichinakh prestupnosti v SSSR. – M., 1961. – S. 58.
Antonyan Yu.M. Sotsial'naya sreda i formirovanie lichnosti prestupnika. – M., 1975. – S. 5.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Kontseptual'nye osnovy profilaktiki pravonarusheniy // Materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii po probleme profilaktiki pravonarusheniy. – M., 1997. – S. 10.
Filosofskaya entsiklopediya. – M., 1960. T. 1. – S. 206.
Kobzar' I.A. Sotsial'naya i kriminologicheskaya obuslovlennost' ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti nesovershennoletnikh (teoriya i praktika). – M., 1998. – S. 36.
Filosofskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar'. – M., 1983. – S. 707.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Prichiny pravonarusheniy. – M., 1976. –S. 18.
Avanesov G.A. Teoriya i metodologiya kriminologicheskogo prognozirovaniya. –M., 1972. – S. 218.
Kuznetsova N.F. Kriminologiya kak nauka // Sovetskaya yustitsiya. 1970, № 2. S. 8.
Goryainov K.K. Kriminologicheskaya obstanovka (metodologicheskie aspekty). – M.: VNII MVD SSSR. 1991. – S. 21.
Goryainov K.K. Kriminologicheskaya obstanovka (metodologicheskie aspekty). – M.: VNII MVD SSSR. 1991. – S. 24.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Prichiny pravonarusheniy. – M., 1976. – S. 126.
Petrunina I.K. K voprosu o prichinakh administrativnykh pravonarusheniy v torgovle // Aktual'nye problemy administrativnoy deliktologii. – Kiev, 1984. – S. 84.
Petrunina I.K. K voprosu o prichinakh administrativnykh pravonarusheniy v torgovle // Aktual'nye problemy administrativnoy deliktologii. – Kiev, 1984. – S. 84.
Karpets I.I. Prestupnost' kak real'nost' // Voprosy filosofii. – 1989. – № 5. – S. 97.
Lazarev B.M., Lunev A.E. Osnovy zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. – 1981. – № 4. – S. 25.
Lozbyakov V.P. Kriminologicheskie osnovy administrativno-yurisdiktsionnoy deyatel'nosti rossiyskoy militsii: Dis… d-ra. yurid. nauk. M., 1995.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Prichiny pravonarusheniy. – M., 1976. – S. 8.
Stolbovoy A.P. Administrativno-predupreditel'nye mery militsii kak sredstvo bor'by s pravonarusheniyami v usloviyakh razvitogo sotsializma: Avtoref. diss…kand. yurid. nauk. – Kiev, 1984. – S. 8.

Reference:

Loginova E.S.. Proper issue of summons in the proceedings on administrative offences // Administrative and municipal law. – 2015. – № 2. – P. 144-151. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.2.12820.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.2.12820

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: One of the ways of legality provision in the proceedings on administrative offences is an obligatory issue of summons on the person, charged with the offence commitment. The improper issue of summons is an unconditional reason for cancelation of determination about administrative punishment infliction. Procedural legislation regulates this sphere inconsistently, consequently, a plenty of problems appear in law-enforcement practice. The article analyzes the criteria of proper issue of summons in the proceedings on administrative offences set in law-enforcement practice. The author uses the general scientific methods (analysis and modeling), and the special methods (comparative-juridical and technical-juridical). The article reveals the problems appearing with serving the summons on the persons, committed the violation norms of the existing legislation. One of the main problems is the evasion of a person from the receipt of summons, and the absence of the algorithm of actions for the administrative bodies’ officials in such situations in the existing legislation. On the base of judicial practice analysis the author offers the possible way to solve this problem.

Keywords: proper issue of a summons, proper issue of a summons criteria, proceedings, way of serving a summons, place of serving a summons, improper issue of a summons, administrative coercion, administrative offence, types of improper issue of a summons, summons

References:
Postanovlenie Dvenadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 13.01.2012 po delu N A12-11381/2011 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Volgo-Vyatskogo okruga ot 12.01.2006 № A82-4488/2005-31. Dosutp iz spravoch.-pravov.sistemy «Konsul'tant Plyus».
Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Severo-Kavkazskogo okruga ot 30.03.2010 po delu № A32-39211/2009-51/735-216AZh // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Severo-Kavkazskogo okruga ot 20.04.2009 po delu № A32-17671/2008-3/304-59AZh // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Sed'mogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 04.03.2013 po delu № A03-17695/2012 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Devyatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 15.01.2010 № 09AP-26296/2009-AK po delu № A40-109094/09-130-585 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Pyatnadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 07.08.2009 № 15AP-5166/2009 po delu № A32-6770/2009 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Vosemnadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 10.12.2013 g. № 18AP-12316/2013 po delu № A07-14405/2013 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Devyatnadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 24.07.2013 po delu № A35-12881/2012 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Reshenie Sankt-Peterburgskogo gorodskogo suda ot 10.02.2011 N 12-80. Dosutp iz spravoch.-pravov.sistemy «Konsul'tant Plyus».
Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Severo-Zapadnogo okruga ot 07.02.2011 po delu № A21-5066/2010 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Vtorogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 10.07.2014 po delu № A17-6868/2013 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Shestogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 30.04.2013 № 06AP-1488/2013 po delu № A37-3811/2012 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Sed'mogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 04.04.2013 po delu № A27-20679/2012 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Dvenadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 24.01.2013 po delu № A57-17820/2012 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Pyatnadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 23.12.2011 № 15AP-13056/2011 po delu № A53-13173/2011 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Moskovskoy oblasti ot 20.10.2009 po delu N A41-26666/09 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Devyatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 29.09.2008 N 09AP-9669/2008-AK po delu N A40-24011/08-146-277 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Chetvertogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 18.05.2011 po delu N A58-169/2011 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Chetvertogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 08.07.2009 po delu N A58-2314/08 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Pyatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 19.10.2009 N 05AP-4762/2009 po delu N A59-3314/2009 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Sed'mogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 18.06.2010 N 07AP-4696/10 po delu N A27-4028/2010 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Trinadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 02.06.2009 po delu N A56-60059/2008 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie FAS Tsentral'nogo okruga ot 26.10.2009 po delu N A62-4434/2009 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie FAS Severo-Kavkazskogo okruga ot 17.12.2010 po delu N A18-372/2010 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Vos'mogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 15.10.2010 po delu N A81-2444/2010 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Vos'mogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 17.04.2014 № 08AP-1344/2014 po delu № A81-4266/2013 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Vos'mogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 28.01.2014 po delu № A75-6813/2013 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Dvenadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 19.03.2009 po delu № A12-987/2009 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Povolzhskogo okruga ot 30.06.2009 po delu № A12-987/2009 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Semnadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 08.10.2012 № 17AP-10429/2012-AK po delu № A60-28934/2012 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Semnadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 26.10.2011 № 17AP-9646/2011-AK po delu № A50P-605/2011. Dosutp iz spravoch.-pravov.sistemy «Konsul'tant Plyus».
Reshenie Nizhegorodskogo oblastnogo suda ot 07.02.2011 po delu N 7-37/11. Dosutp iz spravoch.-pravov.sistemy «Konsul'tant Plyus».
Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Volgo-Vyatskogo okruga ot 07.11.2013 po delu № A29-38/2013 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Volgo-Vyatskogo okruga ot 14.12.2012 po delu № A82-4028/2012 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Vostochno-Sibirskogo okruga ot 24.02.2010 po delu № A10-4035/2009 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Severo-Zapadnogo okruga ot 17.09.2009 po delu № A56-11689/2009 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Ural'skogo okruga ot 15.07.2009 № F09-4913/09-S1 po delu № A76-2428/2009-56-178 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Vos'mogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 10.04.2014 № 08AP-648/2014 po delu № A46-13861/2013 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Trinadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 09.07.2014 po delu № A26-9077/2013 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Pyatnadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 15.11.2013 № 15AP-17775/2013 po delu № A53-14557/2013 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Shestnadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 12.09.2013 po delu № A63-3531/2013 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Semnadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 05.04.2012 № 17AP-2212/2012-AK po delu № A71-17312/2011. Dosutp iz spravoch.-pravov.sistemy «Konsul'tant Plyus».
Postanovlenie Devyatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 09.10.2007 N 09AP-13126/07-AK po delu N A40-6681/07-122-61 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Dvenadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 29.03.2013 po delu № A12-27612/12 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Dvenadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 01.02.2013 po delu № A12-22802/2012 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Vtorogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 24.09.2013 po delu № A28-2949/2013 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Devyatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 23.06.2014 № 09AP-17809/2014 po delu № A40-181674/2013 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Sverdlovskoy oblasti ot 20.03.2009 po delu N A60-5061/2009-S9 Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Vos'mogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 07.10.2010 po delu N A81-2442/2010 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie FAS Severo-Kavkazskogo okruga ot 10.11.2010 po delu N A18-369/2010 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Federal'nyy zakon ot 06.12.2011 № 404-FZ «O vnesenii izmeneniy v Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh» // Rossiyskaya gazeta.-2011.-10 dekabrya.
Postanovlenie Sed'mogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 07.04.2011 N 07AP-1792/10 po delu N A03-13250/2010 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014)

References (transliteration):
Postanovlenie Dvenadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 13.01.2012 po delu N A12-11381/2011 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Volgo-Vyatskogo okruga ot 12.01.2006 № A82-4488/2005-31. Dosutp iz spravoch.-pravov.sistemy «Konsul'tant Plyus».
Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Severo-Kavkazskogo okruga ot 30.03.2010 po delu № A32-39211/2009-51/735-216AZh // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Severo-Kavkazskogo okruga ot 20.04.2009 po delu № A32-17671/2008-3/304-59AZh // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Sed'mogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 04.03.2013 po delu № A03-17695/2012 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Devyatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 15.01.2010 № 09AP-26296/2009-AK po delu № A40-109094/09-130-585 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Pyatnadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 07.08.2009 № 15AP-5166/2009 po delu № A32-6770/2009 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Vosemnadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 10.12.2013 g. № 18AP-12316/2013 po delu № A07-14405/2013 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Devyatnadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 24.07.2013 po delu № A35-12881/2012 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Reshenie Sankt-Peterburgskogo gorodskogo suda ot 10.02.2011 N 12-80. Dosutp iz spravoch.-pravov.sistemy «Konsul'tant Plyus».
Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Severo-Zapadnogo okruga ot 07.02.2011 po delu № A21-5066/2010 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Vtorogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 10.07.2014 po delu № A17-6868/2013 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Shestogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 30.04.2013 № 06AP-1488/2013 po delu № A37-3811/2012 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Sed'mogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 04.04.2013 po delu № A27-20679/2012 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Dvenadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 24.01.2013 po delu № A57-17820/2012 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Pyatnadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 23.12.2011 № 15AP-13056/2011 po delu № A53-13173/2011 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Moskovskoy oblasti ot 20.10.2009 po delu N A41-26666/09 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Devyatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 29.09.2008 N 09AP-9669/2008-AK po delu N A40-24011/08-146-277 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Chetvertogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 18.05.2011 po delu N A58-169/2011 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Chetvertogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 08.07.2009 po delu N A58-2314/08 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Pyatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 19.10.2009 N 05AP-4762/2009 po delu N A59-3314/2009 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Sed'mogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 18.06.2010 N 07AP-4696/10 po delu N A27-4028/2010 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Trinadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 02.06.2009 po delu N A56-60059/2008 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie FAS Tsentral'nogo okruga ot 26.10.2009 po delu N A62-4434/2009 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie FAS Severo-Kavkazskogo okruga ot 17.12.2010 po delu N A18-372/2010 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Vos'mogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 15.10.2010 po delu N A81-2444/2010 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Vos'mogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 17.04.2014 № 08AP-1344/2014 po delu № A81-4266/2013 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Vos'mogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 28.01.2014 po delu № A75-6813/2013 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Dvenadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 19.03.2009 po delu № A12-987/2009 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Povolzhskogo okruga ot 30.06.2009 po delu № A12-987/2009 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Semnadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 08.10.2012 № 17AP-10429/2012-AK po delu № A60-28934/2012 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Semnadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 26.10.2011 № 17AP-9646/2011-AK po delu № A50P-605/2011. Dosutp iz spravoch.-pravov.sistemy «Konsul'tant Plyus».
Reshenie Nizhegorodskogo oblastnogo suda ot 07.02.2011 po delu N 7-37/11. Dosutp iz spravoch.-pravov.sistemy «Konsul'tant Plyus».
Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Volgo-Vyatskogo okruga ot 07.11.2013 po delu № A29-38/2013 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Volgo-Vyatskogo okruga ot 14.12.2012 po delu № A82-4028/2012 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Vostochno-Sibirskogo okruga ot 24.02.2010 po delu № A10-4035/2009 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Severo-Zapadnogo okruga ot 17.09.2009 po delu № A56-11689/2009 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Ural'skogo okruga ot 15.07.2009 № F09-4913/09-S1 po delu № A76-2428/2009-56-178 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Vos'mogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 10.04.2014 № 08AP-648/2014 po delu № A46-13861/2013 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Trinadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 09.07.2014 po delu № A26-9077/2013 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Pyatnadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 15.11.2013 № 15AP-17775/2013 po delu № A53-14557/2013 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Shestnadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 12.09.2013 po delu № A63-3531/2013 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Semnadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 05.04.2012 № 17AP-2212/2012-AK po delu № A71-17312/2011. Dosutp iz spravoch.-pravov.sistemy «Konsul'tant Plyus».
Postanovlenie Devyatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 09.10.2007 N 09AP-13126/07-AK po delu N A40-6681/07-122-61 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Dvenadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 29.03.2013 po delu № A12-27612/12 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Dvenadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 01.02.2013 po delu № A12-22802/2012 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Vtorogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 24.09.2013 po delu № A28-2949/2013 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Devyatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 23.06.2014 № 09AP-17809/2014 po delu № A40-181674/2013 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Sverdlovskoy oblasti ot 20.03.2009 po delu N A60-5061/2009-S9 Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie Vos'mogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 07.10.2010 po delu N A81-2442/2010 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Postanovlenie FAS Severo-Kavkazskogo okruga ot 10.11.2010 po delu N A18-369/2010 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014).
Federal'nyy zakon ot 06.12.2011 № 404-FZ «O vnesenii izmeneniy v Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh» // Rossiyskaya gazeta.-2011.-10 dekabrya.
Postanovlenie Sed'mogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 07.04.2011 N 07AP-1792/10 po delu N A03-13250/2010 // Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2014)

Reference:

Lapina M.A., Karpukhin D.V.. Construction of crimes and state coercive measures in administrative and budget legislation // Administrative and municipal law. – 2015. – № 1. – P. 43-54. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.1.12904.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.1.12904

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The development of administrative legislation has led to the formation of detached branches of Russian legislation – financial, tax, budget, and tariff. Therefore, the corpora delicti of corresponding crimes were included in the codified legal acts – Budget Code of the Russian Federation, Tax Code (chapter 1). This article is aimed at carrying out of comparative analysis of regulations, introducing juridical responsibility for offences in budget sphere, provided by Code of Administrative Offences and Budget Code of the Russian Federation; and at formulation of particular ways of state coercive measures regulation as they are provided by the existing legislation. The methodology of the research is based on the up-to-date achievements of epistemology. The authors use the general philosophical, theoretical methods, dialectics, the system approach, analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, observation, modeling, the traditional juridical methods (formal-logical), and the methods which are used in special sociological research (the statistical method, expert evaluations, etc.). The authors of the article fully share the point of view that has formed in Russian science of administrative law about the administrative legal nature of budget enforcement measures, which are applied by “financial institutions and institutions of the Federal Treasury (their officials) on the grounds of notification about budget enforcement measures application by the body of state (municipal) financial control” (art. 306.2 part 1 BC of the Russian Federation). Study of the problem of correlation of budget and administrative enforcement measures seems to be of a big importance. Budget enforcement measures are provided by part 2 article 306.2 of Budget Code of the Russian Federation.

Keywords: corpus delicti, responsibility, enforcement, sanction, constraint, administration, prohibition, finances, object.

References:
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30.12.2001 N 195-FZ (red. ot 05.05.2014) (s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 22.06.2014) // «Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF», 07.01.2002, N 1 (ch. 1), st. 1.
Byudzhetnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 31.07.1998 N 145-FZ (red. ot 28.12.2013, s izm. ot 03.02.2014) (s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 01.01.2014) // «Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF», 03.08.1998, N 31, st. 3823.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 23 iyulya 2013 g. № 252 – FZ «O vnesenii izmeneniy v Byudzhetnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii i otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // RG. N 172. 07.08.2013.
Administrativnoe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii / otv. redaktor L.L. Popov. Uchebnik dlya bakalavrov. M., 2014. 568 S.
Bakhrakh D.N. Administrativnoe pravo Rossii. Uchebnik. 5-e izdanie. M., 2010. 607 s.
Kardashevskiy V.V. K voprosu o ponyatii «administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya» // Administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya: materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii / Pod red. zav. kafedroy administrativnogo prava VGNA Minfina Rossii, doktora yuridicheskikh nauk, professora M.A. Lapinoy. M., VGNA Minfina. 2012. S. 34 – 36.
Kozlov Yu.M. Administrativnoe pravo. Uchebnik. M., 2005. 554 s.
Lapina M.A. Sovremennye podkhody k opredeleniyu soderzhaniya i struktury instituta administrativnoy yurisdiktsii v sisteme administrativnogo protsessa // Administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya: materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii / Pod red. zav. kafedroy administrativnogo prava VGNA Minfina Rossii, doktora yuridicheskikh nauk, professora M.A. Lapinoy. M., VGNA Minfina. 2012. S. 11 – 21.
Otchet po NIR «Aktual'nye voprosy sovershenstvovaniya pravovogo regulirovaniya v oblasti byudzhetnykh otnosheniy» (nauchnyy rukovoditel', d.yu.n., professor A.A. Fat'yanov). M., Finuniversitet, 2013. // Tekst otcheta razmeshchen na informatsionno-obrazovatel'nom portale Finuniversiteta.
Panov A.B. O nekotorykh voprosakh administrativnoy yurisdiktsii // Administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya: materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii / Pod red. zav. kafedroy administrativnogo prava VGNA Minfina Rossii, doktora yuridicheskikh nauk, professora M.A. Lapinoy. M., VGNA Minfina. 2012. S. 27 – 31.
Shergin A.P. Razmyshleniya ob administrativnoy yurisdiktsii // Administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya: materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii / Pod red. zav. kafedroy administrativnogo prava VGNA Minfina Rossii, doktora yuridicheskikh nauk, professora M.A. Lapinoy. M., VGNA Minfina. 2012. S. 21 – 27.
Agapov A.B. Publichnoe prinuzhdenie
ili obshchestvennaya sanatsiya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 7. - C. 743 - 752. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.7.9037.
Lapina M.A. Kontseptual'nye voprosy razvitiya administrativno-yurisdiktsionnogo zakonodatel'stva v oblasti finansov, nalogov i sborov, strakhovaniya, rynka tsennykh bumag // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2014. - 8. - C. 843 - 856. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.8.12396.

References (transliteration):
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30.12.2001 N 195-FZ (red. ot 05.05.2014) (s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 22.06.2014) // «Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF», 07.01.2002, N 1 (ch. 1), st. 1.
Byudzhetnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 31.07.1998 N 145-FZ (red. ot 28.12.2013, s izm. ot 03.02.2014) (s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 01.01.2014) // «Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF», 03.08.1998, N 31, st. 3823.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 23 iyulya 2013 g. № 252 – FZ «O vnesenii izmeneniy v Byudzhetnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii i otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // RG. N 172. 07.08.2013.
Administrativnoe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii / otv. redaktor L.L. Popov. Uchebnik dlya bakalavrov. M., 2014. 568 S.
Bakhrakh D.N. Administrativnoe pravo Rossii. Uchebnik. 5-e izdanie. M., 2010. 607 s.
Kardashevskiy V.V. K voprosu o ponyatii «administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya» // Administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya: materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii / Pod red. zav. kafedroy administrativnogo prava VGNA Minfina Rossii, doktora yuridicheskikh nauk, professora M.A. Lapinoy. M., VGNA Minfina. 2012. S. 34 – 36.
Kozlov Yu.M. Administrativnoe pravo. Uchebnik. M., 2005. 554 s.
Lapina M.A. Sovremennye podkhody k opredeleniyu soderzhaniya i struktury instituta administrativnoy yurisdiktsii v sisteme administrativnogo protsessa // Administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya: materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii / Pod red. zav. kafedroy administrativnogo prava VGNA Minfina Rossii, doktora yuridicheskikh nauk, professora M.A. Lapinoy. M., VGNA Minfina. 2012. S. 11 – 21.
Otchet po NIR «Aktual'nye voprosy sovershenstvovaniya pravovogo regulirovaniya v oblasti byudzhetnykh otnosheniy» (nauchnyy rukovoditel', d.yu.n., professor A.A. Fat'yanov). M., Finuniversitet, 2013. // Tekst otcheta razmeshchen na informatsionno-obrazovatel'nom portale Finuniversiteta.
Panov A.B. O nekotorykh voprosakh administrativnoy yurisdiktsii // Administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya: materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii / Pod red. zav. kafedroy administrativnogo prava VGNA Minfina Rossii, doktora yuridicheskikh nauk, professora M.A. Lapinoy. M., VGNA Minfina. 2012. S. 27 – 31.
Shergin A.P. Razmyshleniya ob administrativnoy yurisdiktsii // Administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya: materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii / Pod red. zav. kafedroy administrativnogo prava VGNA Minfina Rossii, doktora yuridicheskikh nauk, professora M.A. Lapinoy. M., VGNA Minfina. 2012. S. 21 – 27.
Agapov A.B. Publichnoe prinuzhdenie
ili obshchestvennaya sanatsiya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 7. - C. 743 - 752. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.7.9037.
Lapina M.A. Kontseptual'nye voprosy razvitiya administrativno-yurisdiktsionnogo zakonodatel'stva v oblasti finansov, nalogov i sborov, strakhovaniya, rynka tsennykh bumag // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2014. - 8. - C. 843 - 856. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.8.12396.

Reference:

Vaskevich, K. N.. Uses of Systematic Approach for Research into Legal Responsibility for tax Offences // Administrative and municipal law. – 2014. – № 12. – P. 1257-1263. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.12.13331.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.12.13331

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: This article examines the legal responsibility for violating tax law of the Russian Federation. The work analyses the uses of the systematic approach for studying this legal phenomenon on the basis of which legal responsibility appears to us as a system with its structure and functionalities. This system is described as a “corporeal” structure which is a way of uniting the elements of relatively table subjects and which is typical of the summative system of specific types of legal responsibility and, secondly, the “process” structure – the order of the temporal phases of the processes typical of dynamic systems with parameters changeable with time. The author uses the systematic approach, namely: first, the theory of functional systems developed by P. Anokhin, and second, the theory of dynamic systems, in research of legal phenomena. This article demonstrates the theoretical model of administrative responsibility, on the first level it is represented as a subsystem in the functional system of legal responsibility which makes it possible to define its scope of application, coordination and management connections with the criminal and tax responsibility by separating out a focused useful effect, and on the second level, as a two-stage ongoing process reflecting its contents. This model has a methodological function due to being an important stage is developing specific problems of sector-related types of responsibility, in particular, n tax law, and open ways to their practical improvement.

Keywords: systematic approach, administrative responsibility, functional system, tax responsibility, focused useful effect, tax system, Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation, Tax Code of the Russian Federation, criminal responsibility, legal responsibility.

References:
Anokhin P.K. Ocherki po fiziologii funktsional'nykh sistem. – M., 1975.
Zadneprovskaya M.V .Osushchestvlenie yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti i sotsialisticheskaya zakonnost'. Dis. … kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.01 /-M., 1984.
Kurdyuk P.M. Razvitie nauchnykh podkhodov i kontseptsiy o sushchnosti yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti v kontekste transformatsii rossiyskoy pravovoy sistemy. Nauka i obrazovanie: khozyaystvo i ekonomika; predprinimatel'stvo; pravo i upravlenie. 2012. № 3 (22).
Lipinskiy D.A. O nekotorykh problemakh sistemy yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti // Pravo i politika, 2004. № 12.
Polenina S.V. Sotsialisticheskoe pravo kak sistema // Sotsialisticheskoe pravo i nauchno-tekhnicheskaya revolyutsiya. – M., 1979.
Khasnutdinov R.R. Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost' kak funktsional'naya sistema. Vektor nauki TGU. № 1 (19), 2012
Yagudina V.M. Sistema yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti // Yuridicheskiy mir, 2009. № 10 (154).;
http://www.insor-russia.ru/files/modernUK.pdf (Data obrashcheniya 17.06.2014 g.)

References (transliteration):
Anokhin P.K. Ocherki po fiziologii funktsional'nykh sistem. – M., 1975.
Zadneprovskaya M.V .Osushchestvlenie yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti i sotsialisticheskaya zakonnost'. Dis. … kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.01 /-M., 1984.
Kurdyuk P.M. Razvitie nauchnykh podkhodov i kontseptsiy o sushchnosti yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti v kontekste transformatsii rossiyskoy pravovoy sistemy. Nauka i obrazovanie: khozyaystvo i ekonomika; predprinimatel'stvo; pravo i upravlenie. 2012. № 3 (22).
Lipinskiy D.A. O nekotorykh problemakh sistemy yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti // Pravo i politika, 2004. № 12.
Polenina S.V. Sotsialisticheskoe pravo kak sistema // Sotsialisticheskoe pravo i nauchno-tekhnicheskaya revolyutsiya. – M., 1979.
Khasnutdinov R.R. Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost' kak funktsional'naya sistema. Vektor nauki TGU. № 1 (19), 2012
Yagudina V.M. Sistema yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti // Yuridicheskiy mir, 2009. № 10 (154).;
http://www.insor-russia.ru/files/modernUK.pdf (Data obrashcheniya 17.06.2014 g.)

Reference:

Khramov K. N.. Certain Issues of Proof by Customs Authorities of Guilt in Administrative Cases // Administrative and municipal law. – 2014. – № 11. – P. 1165-1169. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.11.13217.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.11.13217

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The subject of this article is the relationship at law between the custom authorities of the Russian Federation and the parties responsible in customs affairs. Special attention is paid to the powers of the customs authorities in holding declarants administratively responsible. The author considers the problems related to proving the guilt in the context of customs practice in the Russian federation, arbitration courts and the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation. The institute of guilt was analyzed from the point of view of admissible evidence and the requirement to take into account all the facts and circumstances which serve as the basis for exemption for customs duties or their reduction. In this research, the author uses the comparative, statistical methods, as well as induction, analysis and synthesis. Scientific novelty and conclusions: the author makes the conclusion that proof in an administrative offence is the base factor for holding someone administratively responsible and imposing penalties. It is stressed that giving the incorrect Customs Union Commodity Classification of Foreign Economic Activity code is sufficient proof of the declarant’s guilt. In such cases, on the basis of arbitration precedents, in order to find out whether a person is guilty of an administrative offence, it is necessary to comprehensively consider the fact and documents as the evidential base.

Keywords: administrative offence, guilt, customs affairs, Customs Union Commodity Classification of Foreign Economic Activity, customs rules, Customs Code of the Customs Union, Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation, proof, declaration, administrative responsibility.

References:
Khalipov S. V. Tamozhennoe pravo. M.: Izdatel'stvo Yurayt, 2011.-s.24.
Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 07.01.2002, N 1 (ch. 1), st. 1.
https//:www.consultant.ru/
Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Moskovskoy oblasti ot 16.02.2013 po delu №A41-57882/12.
Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 13.12.2010, N 50, st. 6615.
Postanovlenie FAS Moskovskogo okruga ot 14.10.2013 po delu №A41-57882/12.
Vestnik VAS RF, N 8, 2004.
https://my.arbitr.ru
Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 29.07.2002, N 30, st. 3012.
Bychkovskaya A. A. Problemy dokazyvaniya viny po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh (v tamozhennom dele)// Tamozhennoe delo .-M.2010,№2.-s.16-20.
Vestnik VAS RF, N 1, yanvar', 2014.
Postanovlenie FAS Dal'nevostochnogo okruga ot 30.06.2014 №F03-2418/2014 po delu №A51-33538/2013.
Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 14.01.2013, N 2, st. 109.
http://www.customs.ru/
Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 05.12.1994, N 32, st. 3301.
Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 17.06.1996, N 25, st. 2954.

References (transliteration):
Khalipov S. V. Tamozhennoe pravo. M.: Izdatel'stvo Yurayt, 2011.-s.24.
Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 07.01.2002, N 1 (ch. 1), st. 1.
https//:www.consultant.ru/
Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Moskovskoy oblasti ot 16.02.2013 po delu №A41-57882/12.
Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 13.12.2010, N 50, st. 6615.
Postanovlenie FAS Moskovskogo okruga ot 14.10.2013 po delu №A41-57882/12.
Vestnik VAS RF, N 8, 2004.
https://my.arbitr.ru
Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 29.07.2002, N 30, st. 3012.
Bychkovskaya A. A. Problemy dokazyvaniya viny po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh (v tamozhennom dele)// Tamozhennoe delo .-M.2010,№2.-s.16-20.
Vestnik VAS RF, N 1, yanvar', 2014.
Postanovlenie FAS Dal'nevostochnogo okruga ot 30.06.2014 №F03-2418/2014 po delu №A51-33538/2013.
Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 14.01.2013, N 2, st. 109.
http://www.customs.ru/
Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 05.12.1994, N 32, st. 3301.
Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 17.06.1996, N 25, st. 2954.

Reference:

Konstantinova, L.V.. Administrative offences in the sphere of copyright protection within the sphere of competence of the customs bodies. // Administrative and municipal law. – 2014. – № 10. – P. 1048-1054. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.10.13086.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.10.13086

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The article is devoted to the topical issues within the system of legal relations in the sphere of procedural developments regarding administrative offences in the sphere of protection of copyright within the competence of the customs bodies within the framework of the Customs Union, as well as to the specific features of initiating of an administrative offence case under Art. 14.10 of the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation in cases of unlawful use of trademark belonging to the third parties, problems regarding proving guilt of a person transferring counterfeit goods, as well as issues on improving interaction among the competent controlling bodies, both in Russia and in the Customs Union Member States. The scientific study is based upon the comparative and scientific methods of studies, and they are applied for the purpose of improvement of administrative proceedings in the sphere of copyright. Based upon the analysis of the social relations in the sphere of administrative offences cases regarding copyright protection within the competence of the customs bodies within the framework of the Customs Union, the author formulates proposals for the improvement of the legislation in the sphere of proceedings on administrative offences cases and interactions among the controlling bodies in this sphere. In order to achieve the goals mentioned in the Strategy in order do intercept the copyright offences, there is need for the harmonization of the legislations of the Customs Union Member States on administrative offences. There is also need to improve inter-departmental and international cooperation at the supranational level (that is, at the level of the Customs Union), for example, there may be created an unified information database of the documents of various controlling bodies interacting with the customs bodies of the Customs Union.

Keywords: administrative offence, protection of exclusive rights, copyright objects, the Customs Union, counterfeit products, title owner, trademark, similar goods, expert, transition.

References:
Agamagomedova S.A. Pravovye osnovy i osobennosti administrativnoy zashchity olimpiyskoy i paralimpiyskoy simvoliki tamozhennymi organami Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2012. - 9. - C. 81 - 91.
S.A. Agamagomedova Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' za nezakonnoe
ispol'zovanie tovarnykh znakov (po materialam
deyatel'nosti tamozhennykh organov). // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2011. - 2. - C. 70 - 73.
Protsessual'no-ispolnitel'nyy kodeks Respubliki Belarus': Zakon Respubliki Belarus' ot 20.12.2006 № 194-Z [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://tamby.info/kodeks/pikoap.htm / data obrashcheniya: 24.02.2014).
Agamagomedova S.A. Poryadok deystviy tamozhennykh organov RF po zashchite prav na ob'ekty intellektual'noy sobstvennosti i ego optimizatsiya v sovremennykh usloviyakh // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2014. - 6. - C. 559 - 568. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.6.10860.
Kodeks ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh Respubliki Kazakhstan: Zakon Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 30.01.2001 № 156-II [Elektronnyy resurs].URL: http://www.zakon.kz/static/administrativnyykodex.html / (data obrashcheniya: 24.02.2014).
Dobrynin O.V. Vzaimodeystvie Rospatenta i FTS Rossii po voprosam obespecheniya zashchity prav intellektual'noy sobstvennosti//Doklad nachal'nika nachal'nika Upravleniya organizatsii predostavleniya gosudarstvennykh uslug Rospatenta, kan. yurid. nauk na Vserossiyskom seminar-soveshchanii po voprosam zashchity prav intellektual'noy sobstvennosti tamozhennymi organami Rossiyskoy Federatsii 2-6 sentyabrya 2013 g. Irkutsk.
Agamagomedova S. A. Model' administrativno-pravovogo mekhanizma zashchity prav na ob'ekty intellektual'noy sobstvennosti tamozhennymi organami na territorii Evraziyskogo ekonomicheskogo prostranstva // Vestnik Rossiyskoy Tamozhennoy akademii. 2013. № 4. S. 46-47.
Rasporyazhenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 28.12.2012 № 2575-r «O strategii razvitiya tamozhennoy sluzhby Rossiyskoy Federatsii do 2020 goda» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 2013. № 2. St. 109.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 27.11.2010 № 311-FZ «O tamozhennom regulirovanii v Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2010.29 noyabrya.
Tamozhennyy kodeks Tamozhennogo soyuza (prilozhenie k Dogovoru o Tamozhennom kodekse Tamozhennogo soyuza, prinyatomu Resheniem Mezhgosudarstvennogo soveta EvrAzES na urovne glav gosudarstv ot 27.11.2009 № 17) (v red. ot 16.04.2010) // Cobranie zakonodatel'stva RF.2010. № 50. St. 6615.
Ozhegov S.I. Slovar' russkogo yazyka: 70 000 slov / pod obshch. red. prof. L.I. Skvortsova. 24-e izd.,ispravlennoe. M. «ONIKS 21 vek» «Mir» «Obrazovanie» 2004. S. 547.
Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 21.03.2012 № 218 «O federal'noy sluzhbe po intellektual'noy sobstvennosti» [Elektronnyy resurs]. Dostup iz «Konsul'tantPlyus» (data obrashcheniya: 24.02.2014).
Postanovlenie Prezidiuma Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda ot 04.09.2012 № 3127/12. [Elektronnyy resurs]. Dostup iz «Konsul'tantPlyus» (data obrashcheniya: 24.02.2014).
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh. (v red. ot 15.02.2014 № 6-FZ) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF.2002, № 1 (ch. 1). St. 1.
Pis'mo FTS Rossii ot 16.07.2008 № 18-12/28610 «O napravlenii metodicheskikh rekomendatsiy».
Pis'mo FTS Rossii ot 30.10.2009 № 18-12/51934 «Obzor pravoprimenitel'noy praktiki po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v sfere intellektual'noy sobstvennosti».
Postanovlenie Prezidiuma Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda ot 03.02.2009 № 10458/08 // «Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii». 2009 №

References (transliteration):
Agamagomedova S.A. Pravovye osnovy i osobennosti administrativnoy zashchity olimpiyskoy i paralimpiyskoy simvoliki tamozhennymi organami Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2012. - 9. - C. 81 - 91.
S.A. Agamagomedova Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' za nezakonnoe
ispol'zovanie tovarnykh znakov (po materialam
deyatel'nosti tamozhennykh organov). // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2011. - 2. - C. 70 - 73.
Protsessual'no-ispolnitel'nyy kodeks Respubliki Belarus': Zakon Respubliki Belarus' ot 20.12.2006 № 194-Z [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://tamby.info/kodeks/pikoap.htm / data obrashcheniya: 24.02.2014).
Agamagomedova S.A. Poryadok deystviy tamozhennykh organov RF po zashchite prav na ob'ekty intellektual'noy sobstvennosti i ego optimizatsiya v sovremennykh usloviyakh // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2014. - 6. - C. 559 - 568. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.6.10860.
Kodeks ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh Respubliki Kazakhstan: Zakon Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 30.01.2001 № 156-II [Elektronnyy resurs].URL: http://www.zakon.kz/static/administrativnyykodex.html / (data obrashcheniya: 24.02.2014).
Dobrynin O.V. Vzaimodeystvie Rospatenta i FTS Rossii po voprosam obespecheniya zashchity prav intellektual'noy sobstvennosti//Doklad nachal'nika nachal'nika Upravleniya organizatsii predostavleniya gosudarstvennykh uslug Rospatenta, kan. yurid. nauk na Vserossiyskom seminar-soveshchanii po voprosam zashchity prav intellektual'noy sobstvennosti tamozhennymi organami Rossiyskoy Federatsii 2-6 sentyabrya 2013 g. Irkutsk.
Agamagomedova S. A. Model' administrativno-pravovogo mekhanizma zashchity prav na ob'ekty intellektual'noy sobstvennosti tamozhennymi organami na territorii Evraziyskogo ekonomicheskogo prostranstva // Vestnik Rossiyskoy Tamozhennoy akademii. 2013. № 4. S. 46-47.
Rasporyazhenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 28.12.2012 № 2575-r «O strategii razvitiya tamozhennoy sluzhby Rossiyskoy Federatsii do 2020 goda» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 2013. № 2. St. 109.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 27.11.2010 № 311-FZ «O tamozhennom regulirovanii v Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2010.29 noyabrya.
Tamozhennyy kodeks Tamozhennogo soyuza (prilozhenie k Dogovoru o Tamozhennom kodekse Tamozhennogo soyuza, prinyatomu Resheniem Mezhgosudarstvennogo soveta EvrAzES na urovne glav gosudarstv ot 27.11.2009 № 17) (v red. ot 16.04.2010) // Cobranie zakonodatel'stva RF.2010. № 50. St. 6615.
Ozhegov S.I. Slovar' russkogo yazyka: 70 000 slov / pod obshch. red. prof. L.I. Skvortsova. 24-e izd.,ispravlennoe. M. «ONIKS 21 vek» «Mir» «Obrazovanie» 2004. S. 547.
Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 21.03.2012 № 218 «O federal'noy sluzhbe po intellektual'noy sobstvennosti» [Elektronnyy resurs]. Dostup iz «Konsul'tantPlyus» (data obrashcheniya: 24.02.2014).
Postanovlenie Prezidiuma Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda ot 04.09.2012 № 3127/12. [Elektronnyy resurs]. Dostup iz «Konsul'tantPlyus» (data obrashcheniya: 24.02.2014).
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh. (v red. ot 15.02.2014 № 6-FZ) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF.2002, № 1 (ch. 1). St. 1.
Pis'mo FTS Rossii ot 16.07.2008 № 18-12/28610 «O napravlenii metodicheskikh rekomendatsiy».
Pis'mo FTS Rossii ot 30.10.2009 № 18-12/51934 «Obzor pravoprimenitel'noy praktiki po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v sfere intellektual'noy sobstvennosti».
Postanovlenie Prezidiuma Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda ot 03.02.2009 № 10458/08 // «Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii». 2009 №

Reference:

Ryzhkova, A.N.. On the issue of administrative responsibility for the illegal labor activities of a foreign citizen or a person without citizenship in the Russian Federation. // Administrative and municipal law. – 2014. – № 10. – P. 1039-1047. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.10.13014.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.10.13014

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: In the conditions of growing number of labor migrants searching for employment in the territory of the Russian Federation, the study of administrative offences in the sphere of violations of labor migration legislation becomes quite topical. The object of studies involves theoretical and practical aspects of functioning of the institution of administrative responsibility for the violations in the sphere of labor migration in the Russian Federation, namely, those related to the unlawful labor activities of a foreign citizen or a person without citizenship in the territory of the Russian Federation (Art. 18.10 of the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation). Method and methodology of studies are based upon the accumulation of the general scientific and specific scientific means and methods used by the legal science in general, such as dialectic, historical, structural systemic, comparative legal, statistical, formal logical, analysis, systemic method. Generally, the work involves all of the cognition methods as a combination, while the priority is provided to the methods of comparative legal studies and analysis. The scientific novelty of this study is due to the fact that the author attempts to provide a comprehensive evaluation of administrative responsibility for the illegal labor activities by a foreign citizen or a person without citizenship in the Russian Federation. The article involves the key definitions in this sphere, the author provides analysis of the current situation in the labor migration legislation as well as administrative responsibility for its violations, noting the tendency for the stricter administrative responsibility, including higher fines.

Keywords: administrative responsibility, labor migration, foreign citizen, foreign workforce, permit to work, patent, employment, administrative deportation, administrative fine, administrative offence.

References:
Agapov A.B., Administrativnaya otvetstvennost', M.: Yurayt, 2011.
Bazylev B.T. Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost' (teoreticheskie voprosy), 1985.
Bakhrakh D.N. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost': uchebnoe posobie. M.: Yurisprudentsiya, 1999.
Galagan I.A. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' v SSSR (Gosudarstvennoe i material'no-pravovoe issledovanie). Voronezh, 1970.
Kalinina L.A. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost': ucheb. posobie; Izdatel'stvo: Norma. 2009.
Kozlov Yu.M., Popov L.L. Administrativnoe pravo. M.: Yurist', 2000.
Kutafin O.E. Postateynyy nauchno-prakticheskiy kommentariy kollektiva uchenykh-pravovedov pod rukovodstvom akademika RAN O.E. Kutafina k Konstitutsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii. ZAO «Bibliotechka «Rossiyskoy gazety», 2004.
Murashev A.V. Osvobozhdenie pravonarushiteley ot administrativnoy otvetstvennosti organami vnutrennikh del. M., 1985.
Popov L.L. Administrativnoe pravo. M.: YuRAYT, 2011.
Rossinskiy B.V. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost'. M. Norma, 2009.
Simoshchenko I.S., Farukshin M.Kh. Otvetstvennost' po sovetskomu zakonodatel'stvu. –M. yurid. Lit. 1971.
Khamatova S.Kh.: k.yu.n., Avtoreferat «Administrativno-pravovoe regulirovanie v sfere proizvodstva i oborota etilovogo spirta, alkogol'noy i spirtosoderzhashchey produktsii», 2003.
Sidorov E.I. Pravovaya kharakteristika i osobennosti administrativnoy otvetstvennosti za narusheniya tamozhennykh pravil // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2012. - 11. - C. 62 - 66.
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. K voprosu ob osnovanii administrativnoy otvetstvennosti v rossiyskom prave // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 10. - C. 75 - 88. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.10.10153. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_10153.html

References (transliteration):
Agapov A.B., Administrativnaya otvetstvennost', M.: Yurayt, 2011.
Bazylev B.T. Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost' (teoreticheskie voprosy), 1985.
Bakhrakh D.N. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost': uchebnoe posobie. M.: Yurisprudentsiya, 1999.
Galagan I.A. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' v SSSR (Gosudarstvennoe i material'no-pravovoe issledovanie). Voronezh, 1970.
Kalinina L.A. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost': ucheb. posobie; Izdatel'stvo: Norma. 2009.
Kozlov Yu.M., Popov L.L. Administrativnoe pravo. M.: Yurist', 2000.
Kutafin O.E. Postateynyy nauchno-prakticheskiy kommentariy kollektiva uchenykh-pravovedov pod rukovodstvom akademika RAN O.E. Kutafina k Konstitutsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii. ZAO «Bibliotechka «Rossiyskoy gazety», 2004.
Murashev A.V. Osvobozhdenie pravonarushiteley ot administrativnoy otvetstvennosti organami vnutrennikh del. M., 1985.
Popov L.L. Administrativnoe pravo. M.: YuRAYT, 2011.
Rossinskiy B.V. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost'. M. Norma, 2009.
Simoshchenko I.S., Farukshin M.Kh. Otvetstvennost' po sovetskomu zakonodatel'stvu. –M. yurid. Lit. 1971.
Khamatova S.Kh.: k.yu.n., Avtoreferat «Administrativno-pravovoe regulirovanie v sfere proizvodstva i oborota etilovogo spirta, alkogol'noy i spirtosoderzhashchey produktsii», 2003.
Sidorov E.I. Pravovaya kharakteristika i osobennosti administrativnoy otvetstvennosti za narusheniya tamozhennykh pravil // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2012. - 11. - C. 62 - 66.
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. K voprosu ob osnovanii administrativnoy otvetstvennosti v rossiyskom prave // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 10. - C. 75 - 88. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.10.10153. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_10153.html

Reference:

Gromova, G.A.. Some problems relating to the legal regulation of disposal of the medical waste and administrative responsibility for violations regarding disposal of medical waste. // Administrative and municipal law. – 2014. – № 10. – P. 1031-1038. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.10.12091.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.10.12091

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The medical waste, which appears in the process of medical and pharmaceutical activities, is potentially hazardous for both the persons working with medical waste and to the environment and health of general public. That is why the issues regarding destruction of waste of medical and prophylactic institutions are quite topical. The article provides theoretical and practical problems regarding responsibility of persons violating the procedure of disposal of the medical waste. The author provides comparative classification of waste depending on the degree of negative influence upon the environment, as provided for in the Federal Law of June 24, 1998 N. 89-FZ \"On Production and Consumption Waste\", as well as classification of medical waste, as provided for by the Federal Classification of Waste, approved by the Order of the Ministry of Natural Resources of the Russian Federation N 786 of December 2, 2002 for medical waste (hospitals and medical rehabilitation institutions). The author analyzes the issues of lawfulness of administrative responsibility of persons violating the procedure for treatment of the medical waste, organs not being competent to control over the compliance with the sanitary and epidemiological norms. The author applies comparative legal studies in order to single out differences and general patterns of development of legal matters. Comparative legal method becomes necessary for any scientific legal study, since with its help it becomes possible to develop proposals for the improvement of the current administrative law. Synchronic comparison (limited to short periods of time) involves Russian legal system (domestic comparison), allowing to provide general characteristics of the legal system. Normative comparison involves similar legal norms, legislative acts, terms, definitions, classification. Internal comparison mostly involved the level of the legal norms in the same sphere (mycro-comparison). Methodological basis for this work mostly involves comparative legal method of studies. The article singles out some problems regarding treatment of medical waste and administrative responsibility for the violations in the sphere of disposal of medical waste in Russia, as well as provides analysis of gaps and defects of the Russian legislation in this sphere, developing recommendations for the improvement of the Russian legislation on administrative legal regulation of turnover of medical waste. The issues of administrative legal regulation of turnover of medical waste and administrative responsibility in this sphere are rather topical, ever since the Federal Law “On the Environmental Protection” was amended in 2008. There is an obvious legislative shortcoming in the sphere of treatment of medical waste, causing the guilty organizations to avoid responsibility in this sphere. The absence of definition of “medical waste” legislative provisions of the issues of licensing in the sphere of turnover of medical waste and passports of medical waste, discrepancies between the classification of medical waste and classes of danger under the Federal Law “On Production and Consumption Waste” cause insufficient control regulation of this sphere, as well as incorrect treatment of medical waste. In turn, it allows the institutions avoid responsibility for the violations in the sphere of disposal of medical waste, and raises the level of risks of harming the environment, contamination and traumas among the population in general and employees of the health sphere in particular.

Keywords: waste, waste of medical prophylactic institutions, medical waste, classification of waste, licensing, passports, responsibility, turnover, collection of waste, transportation of medical waste.

References:
Federal'nyy zakon ot 24 iyunya 1998 g. N 89-FZ "Ob otkhodakh proizvodstva i potrebleniya"// Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 29 iyunya 1998 g. N 26 st. 3009
Federal'nyy zakon ot 30.12.2008 N 309-FZ O vnesenii izmeneniy v stat'yu 16 Federal'nogo zakona "Ob okhrane okruzhayushchey sredy" i otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Rossiyskaya gazeta, N 267, 31.12.2008
Federal'nyy zakon ot 30 marta 1999 g. N 52-FZ "O sanitarno-epidemiologicheskom blagopoluchii naseleniya"// Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 5 aprelya 1999 g. N 14 st. 1650
Prikaz Ministerstva prirodnykh resursov RF ot 2 dekabrya 2002 g. N 786"Ob utverzhdenii federal'nogo klassifikatsionnogo kataloga otkhodov" // Rossiyskaya gazeta, №12, 23.01.2003
Nomenklatura rabot i uslug v zdravookhranenii (utv. Minzdravsotsrazvitiya RF 12.07.2004) // M., Izdatel'stvo "N'yudiamed", 2004
SanPiN 2.1.7.2790-10 "Sanitarno-epidemiologicheskie trebovaniya k obrashcheniyu s meditsinskimi otkhodami", utverzhdennym postanovleniem Glavnogo gosudarstvennogo sanitarnogo vracha Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 09.12.2010 N 163// Informatsionno-pravovoe obespechenie «Garant». Sudebnaya praktika 1. Postanovlenie Vos'mogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 16 aprelya 2014 g. N 08AP-1453/14 // Informatsionno-pravovoe obespechenie «Garant» 2. Postanovlenie Vos'mogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 31 avgusta 2012 g. N 08AP-6212/12 // Informatsionno-pravovoe obespechenie «Garant» 3. Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Severo-Zapadnogo okruga ot 16 dekabrya 2013 g. N F07-9680/13 po delu N A44-1462/2013 // Informatsionno-pravovoe obespechenie «Garant» 4. Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Povolzhskogo okruga ot 23 oktyabrya 2008 g. N A57-2255/08-132 // Informatsionno-pravovoe obespechenie «Garant» 5. Postanovlenie № 15AP0122997/2012 ot 13.12.1012 g. po delu № A32-49225/2011// Spravochno-pravovaya sistema "Konsul'tant Plyus": 6. Postanovlenie ot 18.12.2012 g. po delu № A46-11542/2012 // Spravochno-pravovaya sistema "Konsul'tant Plyus" Ispol'zovannaya literatura 1. Akimkin V.G. Sanitarno-epidemiologicheskie trebovaniya k organizatsii sbora, obezvrezhivaniya, vremennogo khraneniya i udaleniya otkhodov v lechebno-profilakticheskikh uchrezhdeniyakh: Metodicheskoe posobie.-M.: Izdatel'stvo RAMN, 2004.-84 s. 2. Akimikin V. G. Organizatsionno-epidemiologicheskie aspekty obrashcheniya s otkhodami lechebno-profilakticheskikh uchrezhdeniy// Epidemiologiya i infektsionnye bolezni. 2005.-№2. 3. Oparin P.S. Bakteriologicheskaya ekspertiza bol'nichnykh otkhodov // Epidemiologiya i infektsionnye bolezni.-2002.-№5. – S.35-37 4. Stepanov E.V. Administrativno-pravovoe regulirovanie poryadka or-ganizatsii i provedeniya konkursov na uslugi po utilizatsii meditsinskikh otkhodov // Pravo i zhizn'. 2009. №3. S. 144-162. 1,26 p.l. 5. Shchipanov M.M. Utilizatsiya otkhodov lechebno-profilakticheskikh uchrezhdeniy kak chast' gosudarstvennoy politiki v sfere zdravookhraneniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Sovremennoe pravo. 2008. N 1 (1). S. 21, 22.
Stepanenko V.S. Ekologicheskaya politika v oblasti obrashcheniya s otkhodami v ES i v Rossii // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'. - 2012. - 2. - C. 48 - 102. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/nb/article_297.html
Federal'nyy zakon ot 21 noyabrya 2011 g. N 323-FZ Ob osnovakh okhrany zdorov'ya grazhdan v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Rossiyskaya gazeta N 263, 23.11.2011 g.
Nobel' A.R. Voprosy ispol'zovaniya v dokazyvanii
po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh
v oblasti okhrany okruzhayushchey sredy
inykh protokolov, predusmotrennykh KoAP RF,
i dokumentov, poluchennykh v rezul'tate
osushchestvleniya gosudarstvennogo
kontrolya (nadzora)
i munitsipal'nogo kontrolya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 7. - C. 767 - 769. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.7.9057.
Kostennikov M.V. K voprosu o nekotorykh aktual'nykh problemakh administrativnogo prava // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 71 - 95. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.4.8840. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8840.html

References (transliteration):
Federal'nyy zakon ot 24 iyunya 1998 g. N 89-FZ "Ob otkhodakh proizvodstva i potrebleniya"// Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 29 iyunya 1998 g. N 26 st. 3009
Federal'nyy zakon ot 30.12.2008 N 309-FZ O vnesenii izmeneniy v stat'yu 16 Federal'nogo zakona "Ob okhrane okruzhayushchey sredy" i otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Rossiyskaya gazeta, N 267, 31.12.2008
Federal'nyy zakon ot 30 marta 1999 g. N 52-FZ "O sanitarno-epidemiologicheskom blagopoluchii naseleniya"// Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 5 aprelya 1999 g. N 14 st. 1650
Prikaz Ministerstva prirodnykh resursov RF ot 2 dekabrya 2002 g. N 786"Ob utverzhdenii federal'nogo klassifikatsionnogo kataloga otkhodov" // Rossiyskaya gazeta, №12, 23.01.2003
Nomenklatura rabot i uslug v zdravookhranenii (utv. Minzdravsotsrazvitiya RF 12.07.2004) // M., Izdatel'stvo "N'yudiamed", 2004
SanPiN 2.1.7.2790-10 "Sanitarno-epidemiologicheskie trebovaniya k obrashcheniyu s meditsinskimi otkhodami", utverzhdennym postanovleniem Glavnogo gosudarstvennogo sanitarnogo vracha Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 09.12.2010 N 163// Informatsionno-pravovoe obespechenie «Garant». Sudebnaya praktika 1. Postanovlenie Vos'mogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 16 aprelya 2014 g. N 08AP-1453/14 // Informatsionno-pravovoe obespechenie «Garant» 2. Postanovlenie Vos'mogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 31 avgusta 2012 g. N 08AP-6212/12 // Informatsionno-pravovoe obespechenie «Garant» 3. Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Severo-Zapadnogo okruga ot 16 dekabrya 2013 g. N F07-9680/13 po delu N A44-1462/2013 // Informatsionno-pravovoe obespechenie «Garant» 4. Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Povolzhskogo okruga ot 23 oktyabrya 2008 g. N A57-2255/08-132 // Informatsionno-pravovoe obespechenie «Garant» 5. Postanovlenie № 15AP0122997/2012 ot 13.12.1012 g. po delu № A32-49225/2011// Spravochno-pravovaya sistema "Konsul'tant Plyus": 6. Postanovlenie ot 18.12.2012 g. po delu № A46-11542/2012 // Spravochno-pravovaya sistema "Konsul'tant Plyus" Ispol'zovannaya literatura 1. Akimkin V.G. Sanitarno-epidemiologicheskie trebovaniya k organizatsii sbora, obezvrezhivaniya, vremennogo khraneniya i udaleniya otkhodov v lechebno-profilakticheskikh uchrezhdeniyakh: Metodicheskoe posobie.-M.: Izdatel'stvo RAMN, 2004.-84 s. 2. Akimikin V. G. Organizatsionno-epidemiologicheskie aspekty obrashcheniya s otkhodami lechebno-profilakticheskikh uchrezhdeniy// Epidemiologiya i infektsionnye bolezni. 2005.-№2. 3. Oparin P.S. Bakteriologicheskaya ekspertiza bol'nichnykh otkhodov // Epidemiologiya i infektsionnye bolezni.-2002.-№5. – S.35-37 4. Stepanov E.V. Administrativno-pravovoe regulirovanie poryadka or-ganizatsii i provedeniya konkursov na uslugi po utilizatsii meditsinskikh otkhodov // Pravo i zhizn'. 2009. №3. S. 144-162. 1,26 p.l. 5. Shchipanov M.M. Utilizatsiya otkhodov lechebno-profilakticheskikh uchrezhdeniy kak chast' gosudarstvennoy politiki v sfere zdravookhraneniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Sovremennoe pravo. 2008. N 1 (1). S. 21, 22.
Stepanenko V.S. Ekologicheskaya politika v oblasti obrashcheniya s otkhodami v ES i v Rossii // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'. - 2012. - 2. - C. 48 - 102. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/nb/article_297.html
Federal'nyy zakon ot 21 noyabrya 2011 g. N 323-FZ Ob osnovakh okhrany zdorov'ya grazhdan v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Rossiyskaya gazeta N 263, 23.11.2011 g.
Nobel' A.R. Voprosy ispol'zovaniya v dokazyvanii
po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh
v oblasti okhrany okruzhayushchey sredy
inykh protokolov, predusmotrennykh KoAP RF,
i dokumentov, poluchennykh v rezul'tate
osushchestvleniya gosudarstvennogo
kontrolya (nadzora)
i munitsipal'nogo kontrolya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 7. - C. 767 - 769. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.7.9057.
Kostennikov M.V. K voprosu o nekotorykh aktual'nykh problemakh administrativnogo prava // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 71 - 95. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.4.8840. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8840.html

Reference:

Volchenko, T.I.. Provision of legal assistance by the customs bodies of the Russian Federation in the proceedings on administrative offences cases. // Administrative and municipal law. – 2014. – № 9. – P. 938-944. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.9.12751.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.9.12751

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The article provides the study of the mechanism for the provision of legal assistance by the customs bodies of the Russian Federation in administrative offence cases, providing for its main stages. Additionally, the author pays attention to the fact that the legislator fails to list procedural acts which may be required from abroad via sending request for legal assistance on administrative offence cases in Chapter 29.1 of the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation. Based upon the interpretation of the provisions of the said Code with due consideration of the Treaty on Legal Aid and Cooperation of the Customs Bodies of the Member States of the Customs Union on criminal and administrative offence cases the author provides analysis of the amount of the legal aid requested by the customs bodies of the Russian Federation in the administrative offences cases. The methodological basis for the study involved dialectic materialism and the system of general and specific scientific methods based upon it, including: formal logical method, systemic method, method of comparative legal studies, etc. Based upon the analysis of norms of the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation, as well as international treaties on cooperation and mutual aid in customs cases the author studies the main stages of provision of legal assistance by the customs bodies of the Russian Federation in administrative offence cases, specifying their specific features. Additionally, the author names the procedural acts, which may be requested via sending the request on legal assistance on administrative offence cases.

Keywords: legal aid, administrative offences, administrative process, international cooperation, customs bodies, customs offences, proof, request, sending a request, implementing a request.

References:
Zubach A.V., Pyatikova E.A., Khomyakov L.L. Aministrativno-yurisdiktsionnaya deyatel'nost' tamozhennykh organov: monografiya. M.: RTA, 2009. – 124 s.
O ratifikatsii Konventsii o pravovoy pomoshchi i pravovykh ot-nosheniyakh po grazhdanskim, semeynym i ugolovnym delam: feder. zakon ot 04 avg. 1994 g. № 16-FZ // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva RF.-1994.-№ 15.-st. 1684.
Novikov, A.B. Sovershenstvovanie pravovogo obespecheniya pravookhranitel'noy deyatel'nosti tamozhennykh organov / A.B. Novikov // Vneshnetorgovoe pravo. 2008. № 2.-Rezhim dostupa: SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Pogodina, N.A. Administrativno-pravovoe regulirovanie tamozhennogo dosmotra / N.A. Pogodina // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2010. № 12.-S. 66–71.
Annenkov, A.Yu. Arest tovarov, transportnykh sredstv i inykh veshchey kak mera obespecheniya proizvodstva po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh / A.Yu. Annenkov // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess.-2011.-№ 12.-S. 25–28.
Agapov A.B. Postateynyy kommentariy k Kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh (rasshirennyy, s ispol'zovaniem materialov sudebnoy praktiki).-Rezhim dostupa: SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Ilyasov V.V. Pravovye osnovy vzaimodeystviya tamozhennykh or-ganov Rossiyskoy Federatsii i zarubezhnykh stran pri vedenii proizvodstva po delam o narushenii tamozhennykh pravil: dis. kand. yurid. nauk. Moskva, 2002. – 224 s.
V.D. Plesovskikh Tendentsii razvitiya federal'nogo administrativno-
deliktnogo prava i zakonodatel'stva // Pravo i politika. - 2012. - 12. - C. 1990 - 1994.
Strigunova N.Yu. Dokazyvanie po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v oblasti tamozhennogo dela v gosudarstvakh-chlenakh Tamozhennogo soyuza EvrAzES (sravnitel'no-pravovoy analiz) // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 10. - C. 980 - 985. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.10.9765.

References (transliteration):
Zubach A.V., Pyatikova E.A., Khomyakov L.L. Aministrativno-yurisdiktsionnaya deyatel'nost' tamozhennykh organov: monografiya. M.: RTA, 2009. – 124 s.
O ratifikatsii Konventsii o pravovoy pomoshchi i pravovykh ot-nosheniyakh po grazhdanskim, semeynym i ugolovnym delam: feder. zakon ot 04 avg. 1994 g. № 16-FZ // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva RF.-1994.-№ 15.-st. 1684.
Novikov, A.B. Sovershenstvovanie pravovogo obespecheniya pravookhranitel'noy deyatel'nosti tamozhennykh organov / A.B. Novikov // Vneshnetorgovoe pravo. 2008. № 2.-Rezhim dostupa: SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Pogodina, N.A. Administrativno-pravovoe regulirovanie tamozhennogo dosmotra / N.A. Pogodina // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2010. № 12.-S. 66–71.
Annenkov, A.Yu. Arest tovarov, transportnykh sredstv i inykh veshchey kak mera obespecheniya proizvodstva po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh / A.Yu. Annenkov // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess.-2011.-№ 12.-S. 25–28.
Agapov A.B. Postateynyy kommentariy k Kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh (rasshirennyy, s ispol'zovaniem materialov sudebnoy praktiki).-Rezhim dostupa: SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Ilyasov V.V. Pravovye osnovy vzaimodeystviya tamozhennykh or-ganov Rossiyskoy Federatsii i zarubezhnykh stran pri vedenii proizvodstva po delam o narushenii tamozhennykh pravil: dis. kand. yurid. nauk. Moskva, 2002. – 224 s.
V.D. Plesovskikh Tendentsii razvitiya federal'nogo administrativno-
deliktnogo prava i zakonodatel'stva // Pravo i politika. - 2012. - 12. - C. 1990 - 1994.
Strigunova N.Yu. Dokazyvanie po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v oblasti tamozhennogo dela v gosudarstvakh-chlenakh Tamozhennogo soyuza EvrAzES (sravnitel'no-pravovoy analiz) // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 10. - C. 980 - 985. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.10.9765.

Reference:

Belenko, V.V.. Influence of international law in the sphere of fighting legalization of criminal income upon the Russian system of financial control in the banking sector. // Administrative and municipal law. – 2014. – № 9. – P. 907-911. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.9.12459.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.9.12459

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The article concerns topical issues of development and improvement of the Russian legal institution of financial control in the sphere of fighting legalization of criminal income. Topicality of the study is due to the great public importance of this direction in the financial legal policy. Providing arguments regarding constructive moments in the sphere of fighting money laundering and terrorism financing in the foreign system of control over the financial resources, the author at the same time points out the problems should Russia follow foreign legal norms without regard to varying specificities in the understanding of democratic principles in various states. The study is based upon the combination of general and special methods of scientific analysis: dialectic, logical, comparative legal, normative. The conclusion is made on the need to develop Russian standards for the financial control based upon following the FATF recommendations in close interaction with its Member States. The author offers a set of measures in order to improve the quality of work of the special financial control body: Federal Financial Monitoring Service.

Keywords: fighting legalization of income, financial control, banking sector, financial resources, risks, terrorism financing, accounting operations, client, FATF Member States, FATF standards.

References:
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30.12.2001. № 195-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2002. № 1 (chast' I) St. 1 (s posl. izm. i dop.).
Rossinskiy B.V., Starilov Yu.N.. Administrativnoe pravo: uchebnik dlya vuzov, 4 izd. – M.: Norma: Infra-M, 2010.
Khomyakov L.L., Karpechenkov M.Yu., Sidorov E.I. Administrativnoe proizvodstvo po delam o narushenii tamozhennykh pravil: kurs lektsiy M.: Izd-vo RTA, 2011 g.
Strigunova N.Yu. Dokazyvanie po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v oblasti tamozhennogo dela v gosudarstvakh-chlenakh Tamozhennogo soyuza EvrAzES (sravnitel'no-pravovoy analiz) // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 10. - C. 980 - 985. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.10.9765.
Obydenov V.V. K voprosu o soderzhanie obstoyatel'stv, smyagchayushchikh administrativnuyu otvetstven-
nost' i ikh sootnoshenie s obstoyatel'stvami svyazannymi s osvobozhdeniem ot administrativnoy ot-
vetstvennosti // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 10. - C. 965 - 975. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.10.9717.
Kurakin A.V. Kompetentsiya politsii v sfere realizatsii zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 28 - 48. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.4.8841. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8841.html
Obydenov V.V. Obstoyatel'stva smyagchayushchie
administrativnuyu otvetstvennost'
v yurisdiktsionnoy deyatel'nosti
politsii // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2013. - 4. - C. 244 - 253. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.4.9582.
Sidorov E.I. Problemy primeneniya aresta tovarov i transportnykh sredstv kak mery obespecheniya proizvodstva po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v oblasti tamozhennogo dela // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2012. - 1. - C. 59 - 62.
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. K voprosu ob osnovanii administrativnoy otvetstvennosti v rossiyskom prave // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 10. - C. 75 - 88. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.10.10153. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_10153.html
Kurakin A.V., Badulin A.D., Tregubova E.V. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' za pravonarusheniya na rynke alkogolya i rol' politsii v ee realizatsii // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 10. - C. 28 - 74. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.10.10151. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_10151.html
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V., Tregubova E.V. Konstitutsionnoe pravo na provedenie mirnykh sobraniy, mitingov, demonstratsiy, shestviy i piketirovaniya i administrativnaya otvetstvennost' kak sredstvo ego obespecheniya // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 8. - C. 82 - 105. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.8.9955. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_9955.html

References (transliteration):
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30.12.2001. № 195-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2002. № 1 (chast' I) St. 1 (s posl. izm. i dop.).
Rossinskiy B.V., Starilov Yu.N.. Administrativnoe pravo: uchebnik dlya vuzov, 4 izd. – M.: Norma: Infra-M, 2010.
Khomyakov L.L., Karpechenkov M.Yu., Sidorov E.I. Administrativnoe proizvodstvo po delam o narushenii tamozhennykh pravil: kurs lektsiy M.: Izd-vo RTA, 2011 g.
Strigunova N.Yu. Dokazyvanie po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v oblasti tamozhennogo dela v gosudarstvakh-chlenakh Tamozhennogo soyuza EvrAzES (sravnitel'no-pravovoy analiz) // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 10. - C. 980 - 985. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.10.9765.
Obydenov V.V. K voprosu o soderzhanie obstoyatel'stv, smyagchayushchikh administrativnuyu otvetstven-
nost' i ikh sootnoshenie s obstoyatel'stvami svyazannymi s osvobozhdeniem ot administrativnoy ot-
vetstvennosti // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 10. - C. 965 - 975. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.10.9717.
Kurakin A.V. Kompetentsiya politsii v sfere realizatsii zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 28 - 48. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.4.8841. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8841.html
Obydenov V.V. Obstoyatel'stva smyagchayushchie
administrativnuyu otvetstvennost'
v yurisdiktsionnoy deyatel'nosti
politsii // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2013. - 4. - C. 244 - 253. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.4.9582.
Sidorov E.I. Problemy primeneniya aresta tovarov i transportnykh sredstv kak mery obespecheniya proizvodstva po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v oblasti tamozhennogo dela // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2012. - 1. - C. 59 - 62.
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. K voprosu ob osnovanii administrativnoy otvetstvennosti v rossiyskom prave // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 10. - C. 75 - 88. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.10.10153. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_10153.html
Kurakin A.V., Badulin A.D., Tregubova E.V. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' za pravonarusheniya na rynke alkogolya i rol' politsii v ee realizatsii // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 10. - C. 28 - 74. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.10.10151. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_10151.html
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V., Tregubova E.V. Konstitutsionnoe pravo na provedenie mirnykh sobraniy, mitingov, demonstratsiy, shestviy i piketirovaniya i administrativnaya otvetstvennost' kak sredstvo ego obespecheniya // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 8. - C. 82 - 105. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.8.9955. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_9955.html

Reference:

Abdulgalimov, R.Z., Suntsov, A.P.. Legal responsibility of non-governmental organizations as subjects of administration of public affairs. // Administrative and municipal law. – 2014. – № 8. – P. 807-813. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.8.12358.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.8.12358

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The object of studies in this article involves legal responsibility of political public non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and types of responsibility of such organizations. The author analyzes the existing opinions in the sphere of application of certain types of responsibility of NGOs in the Russian legal doctrine. In this respect the authors distinguish positive and negative legal responsibility, providing brief characteristics of each sub-type of responsibility in certain situations, as well as viability of application of certain types of responsibility in certain situations. Methodology of studies is viewed from the standpoint of materialistic dialectics, the authors use general scientific cognition methods — system, generalization and analysis of scientific, normative and practical materials, methods of dialectic cognition. The scientific novelty of this article is due to the studies of the legal responsibility of political public NGOs within the framework of the modern Russian legislation, as well as the specific features of relations between the state and the subject involved in the administration of public affairs in the process of application of certain legal norms in cases of administrative offences.

Keywords: non-governmental organizations, positive responsibility, legal responsibility, negative, administration, public affairs, society, democracy, citizens.

Contact information: Abdulgalimov, Rustam Zuhrebegovich, 628426, Russia, Surgut, pr. Lenina, 1.

References:
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V., Pavlyuk A.V. K voprosu o ponyatii i metodakh gosudarstvennogo upravleniya v administrativnom prave // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya.-2014.-2.-C. 40-63. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2014.2.11188. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_11188.html
Suntsov A.P. Administrativnye pravonarusheniya v sfere organizatsii i provedeniya vyborov.// Nauch.-prakt. komment. / Suntsov A.P., Serkov V.A., Mishunina A.A. ; Ros. Federatsiya, Tyum. obl., Izbirat. komis. Tyum. obl.. Tyumen', 2005.
Grudtsyna L.Yu., Petrov S.M. Vlast' i grazhdanskoe obshchestvo v Rossii: vzaimodeystvie i protivo-stoyanie // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo.-2012.-1.-C. 19-29.
Lapin A.E., Petrova Yu.A. K voprosu o realizatsii polnomochiy predstavitel'nykh organov mestnogo samoupravleniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo.-2011.-4.-C. 24-33.
E.V. Moiseeva. K voprosu o pravosub'ektnosti publichno-pravovykh obrazovaniy v grazhdanskom prave Rossii // Yurist. 2006. № 9.
[Postanovlenie prezidiuma VAS RF № 9498/04 ot 16.11.2004] Delo po isku o priznanii nedeystvitel'nym dogovora vykupa imushchestva v chasti priobreteniya nezhilykh pomeshcheniy napravleno na novoe rassmotrenie v svyazi s nepolnym issledovaniem arbitrazhnym sudom obstoyatel'stv dela // Vestnik VAS RF. 2005. №3.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 19.05.1995 № 83-FZ «Ob obshchestvennykh ob'edineniyakh» // SZ RF. 1995. № 21. St. 1930.
V.M. Serykh. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava. – M.: Bylina. 1998. Gl. 3, 4, 23.
E.S. Shugrina. Osobennosti konstitutsionno-pravovoy i munitsipal'no-pravovoy otvetstvennosti organov i dolzhnostnykh lits mestnogo samoupravleniya // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2005. №5.
V.A. Vinogradov. Osnovanie konstitutsionno-pravovoy otvetstvennosti // Zakonodatel'stvo. 2003. №2.
G.N. Chebotarev. Sootnoshenie konstitutsionno-pravovoy i munitsipal'no-pravovoy otvetstvennosti v sisteme mestnogo samoupravleniya // Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2002. №4; E.S. Shugrina. Munitsipal'noe pravo. Uchebnik. – M.: Prospekt. 2004. S. 293-294.
Naprimer: F.M. Mikhaylovich. «Delo KPSS» v Konstitutsionnom sude: zapiski uchastnikov protsessa. M.: Bylina. 1999. S. 169; Teoriya gosudarstva i prava: Uchebnik. N.I. Matuzov, A.V. Mal'ko. – M.: Yurist'. 2005.
I.A. Umnova. Konstitutsionnye osnovy sovremennogo rossiyskogo federalizma. M.: Izdatel'stvo «Delo». 1998. S. 219.
A.I. Korolev, S.M. Kazantsev. Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie i pravo: istoriya i sovremennost'. – Leningrad: Izdatel'stvo Leningradskogo universiteta. 1984. S. 12.
I.P. Safronova. Edinonachalie i kollegial'nost' v sotsialisticheskom promyshlennom predpriyatii. – M.: Vysshaya shkola. 1978. S. 49.
V.M. Chkhikvadze. Sotsialisticheskiy gumanizm i prava cheloveka: Leninskie idei i sovremennost'. – M.: Nauka, 1978. S. 215.
Pimanova M.A. Pravovoy status gosudarstvenno-obshchestvennykh ob'edineniy (konstitutsionno-pravovoe issledovanie). dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Tyumen'. 2007. S. 113.
Suntsov A.P. Pravonarusheniya v izbiratel'noy sisteme sub'ekta Rossiyskoy Federatsii. (Konstitutsionno-pravovoe issledovanie).//dissertatsiya na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni doktora yuridicheskikh nauk Ekaterinburg, 2000
M.A. Lipchanskaya Formy uchastiya grazhdan v upravlenii delami gosudarstva v sfere ispolnitel'noy vlasti. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo.-2011.-2.-C. 19-24.
Suntsov A.P., Voronina Yu.I. K voprosu o ponyatii i sushchnosti nezavisimoy antikorruptsionnoy ekspertizy normativnykh pravovykh aktov. //Akademicheskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2013. № 3 (53). S. 24-29.
Shchuplenkov O.V., Shchuplenkov N.O. Transformatsiya vlasti v protsesse postroeniya grazhdanskogo obshchestva v Rossii // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki.-2013.-9.-C. 20-88. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2013.9.9053. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_9053.html
I. D. Koroeva Filosofiya vzaimodeystviya vlasti i naroda // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2012.-4.-C. 18-24.
Suntsov A.P., Tikhiy R.S. Sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya zakonodatel'stva Tyumenskoy oblasti o pooshchreniyakh. //Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2004. № 1. S. 219-225.
Suntsov A.P. Zakonodatel'noe obespechenie administrativno-pravovogo rezhima prebyvaniya (prozhivaniya) inostrannykh grazhdan i lits bez grazhdanstva v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: problemy i perspektivy. // Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2012. № 3. S. 56-61.
R.R. Khasnutdinov Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost'
kak tselostnoe obrazovanie // Pravo i politika. - 2013. - 4. - C. 560 - 564. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.04.15.

References (transliteration):
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V., Pavlyuk A.V. K voprosu o ponyatii i metodakh gosudarstvennogo upravleniya v administrativnom prave // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya.-2014.-2.-C. 40-63. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2014.2.11188. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_11188.html
Suntsov A.P. Administrativnye pravonarusheniya v sfere organizatsii i provedeniya vyborov.// Nauch.-prakt. komment. / Suntsov A.P., Serkov V.A., Mishunina A.A. ; Ros. Federatsiya, Tyum. obl., Izbirat. komis. Tyum. obl.. Tyumen', 2005.
Grudtsyna L.Yu., Petrov S.M. Vlast' i grazhdanskoe obshchestvo v Rossii: vzaimodeystvie i protivo-stoyanie // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo.-2012.-1.-C. 19-29.
Lapin A.E., Petrova Yu.A. K voprosu o realizatsii polnomochiy predstavitel'nykh organov mestnogo samoupravleniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo.-2011.-4.-C. 24-33.
E.V. Moiseeva. K voprosu o pravosub'ektnosti publichno-pravovykh obrazovaniy v grazhdanskom prave Rossii // Yurist. 2006. № 9.
[Postanovlenie prezidiuma VAS RF № 9498/04 ot 16.11.2004] Delo po isku o priznanii nedeystvitel'nym dogovora vykupa imushchestva v chasti priobreteniya nezhilykh pomeshcheniy napravleno na novoe rassmotrenie v svyazi s nepolnym issledovaniem arbitrazhnym sudom obstoyatel'stv dela // Vestnik VAS RF. 2005. №3.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 19.05.1995 № 83-FZ «Ob obshchestvennykh ob'edineniyakh» // SZ RF. 1995. № 21. St. 1930.
V.M. Serykh. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava. – M.: Bylina. 1998. Gl. 3, 4, 23.
E.S. Shugrina. Osobennosti konstitutsionno-pravovoy i munitsipal'no-pravovoy otvetstvennosti organov i dolzhnostnykh lits mestnogo samoupravleniya // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2005. №5.
V.A. Vinogradov. Osnovanie konstitutsionno-pravovoy otvetstvennosti // Zakonodatel'stvo. 2003. №2.
G.N. Chebotarev. Sootnoshenie konstitutsionno-pravovoy i munitsipal'no-pravovoy otvetstvennosti v sisteme mestnogo samoupravleniya // Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2002. №4; E.S. Shugrina. Munitsipal'noe pravo. Uchebnik. – M.: Prospekt. 2004. S. 293-294.
Naprimer: F.M. Mikhaylovich. «Delo KPSS» v Konstitutsionnom sude: zapiski uchastnikov protsessa. M.: Bylina. 1999. S. 169; Teoriya gosudarstva i prava: Uchebnik. N.I. Matuzov, A.V. Mal'ko. – M.: Yurist'. 2005.
I.A. Umnova. Konstitutsionnye osnovy sovremennogo rossiyskogo federalizma. M.: Izdatel'stvo «Delo». 1998. S. 219.
A.I. Korolev, S.M. Kazantsev. Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie i pravo: istoriya i sovremennost'. – Leningrad: Izdatel'stvo Leningradskogo universiteta. 1984. S. 12.
I.P. Safronova. Edinonachalie i kollegial'nost' v sotsialisticheskom promyshlennom predpriyatii. – M.: Vysshaya shkola. 1978. S. 49.
V.M. Chkhikvadze. Sotsialisticheskiy gumanizm i prava cheloveka: Leninskie idei i sovremennost'. – M.: Nauka, 1978. S. 215.
Pimanova M.A. Pravovoy status gosudarstvenno-obshchestvennykh ob'edineniy (konstitutsionno-pravovoe issledovanie). dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Tyumen'. 2007. S. 113.
Suntsov A.P. Pravonarusheniya v izbiratel'noy sisteme sub'ekta Rossiyskoy Federatsii. (Konstitutsionno-pravovoe issledovanie).//dissertatsiya na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni doktora yuridicheskikh nauk Ekaterinburg, 2000
M.A. Lipchanskaya Formy uchastiya grazhdan v upravlenii delami gosudarstva v sfere ispolnitel'noy vlasti. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo.-2011.-2.-C. 19-24.
Suntsov A.P., Voronina Yu.I. K voprosu o ponyatii i sushchnosti nezavisimoy antikorruptsionnoy ekspertizy normativnykh pravovykh aktov. //Akademicheskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2013. № 3 (53). S. 24-29.
Shchuplenkov O.V., Shchuplenkov N.O. Transformatsiya vlasti v protsesse postroeniya grazhdanskogo obshchestva v Rossii // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki.-2013.-9.-C. 20-88. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2013.9.9053. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_9053.html
I. D. Koroeva Filosofiya vzaimodeystviya vlasti i naroda // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2012.-4.-C. 18-24.
Suntsov A.P., Tikhiy R.S. Sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya zakonodatel'stva Tyumenskoy oblasti o pooshchreniyakh. //Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2004. № 1. S. 219-225.
Suntsov A.P. Zakonodatel'noe obespechenie administrativno-pravovogo rezhima prebyvaniya (prozhivaniya) inostrannykh grazhdan i lits bez grazhdanstva v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: problemy i perspektivy. // Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2012. № 3. S. 56-61.
R.R. Khasnutdinov Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost'
kak tselostnoe obrazovanie // Pravo i politika. - 2013. - 4. - C. 560 - 564. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.04.15.

Reference:

Klepikov, S.N., Klepikova, O.S.. Administrative delict policy of the Russian Federation and the principles of establishing administrative responsibility. // Administrative and municipal law. – 2014. – № 8. – P. 801-806. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.8.11432.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.8.11432

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The principles play the foremost significant role in the implementation of the main provisions of the administrative responsibility institution. The problem of definition of principles of legal responsibility still does not have an uniform solution. The current Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation provided in its Art. 1.3 only for the objects of competence of the Russian Federation, and it had a negative impact upon the regional law-making activities and legal practice. Regarding the administrative responsibility both the general constitutional and special principles are applied. The authors use the main provisions of the general scientific dialectic method of scientific cognition, as well as systemic method, historical legal studies, comparative legal methods, and various techniques of formal logic Implementation of administrative punishments is based upon certain clearly established rules, which are called “principles” in the legal literature. Currently the practice of application of principles of administrative responsibility is based upon both the specific features of implementation of legal norms in a nation state, and attention to the global legal problems. Based upon the critical analysis of the modern condition of administrative delict legislation of the constituent subjects of the Russian Federation the authors substantiate propositions for the improvement of the legal regulation of responsibility principles.

Keywords: administrative offence, principles for establishing responsibility, administrative delict legislation, administrative responsibility, administrative delict policy, regional legislation, principle of succession, principle of efficiency, principle of legal certainty, principle of proportionality of punishment.

Contact information: Klepikov, Sergey Nikolaevich, 394006, Russia, Voronezh, ul. 20-letia Oktyabrya, 95.

References:
V.D. Plesovskikh Tendentsii razvitiya federal'nogo administrativno-deliktnogo prava i zakonodatel'stva // Pravo i politika.-2012.-12.-C. 1990-1994.
Goncharov V.V. Rol' printsipa tsentralizma i detsentralizatsii v organizatsii i deyatel'nosti gosudarstvennogo apparata v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // NB: Ekonomika, trendy i upravlenie.-2014.-1.-C. 64-75. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4595.2014.1.2020. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/etc/article_2020.html
PUMA. – 1999.-№ 4. – Rev. 1.
Klepikov S.N. Zakonodatel'naya deyatel'nost' sub'ektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii v oblasti ustanovleniya administrativnoy otvetstvennosti: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk / S.N. Klepikov. – Voronezh, 2003. – 240 s.
Sravnitel'nyy analiz zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh Rossiyskoy Federatsii i Respubliki Belarus': (informatsionno-analiticheskiy obzor) : ucheb. posobie. – Volgograd: VA MVD Rossii, 2010. – 121 s.
Yusupov, V.A. Teoriya administrativnogo prava / V.A. Yusupov. – M.: Yurid. lit, 1985. – 160 s.
Volkov, A.M., Dugenets, A.S. Administrativnoe pravo : ucheb. / A.M. Volkov, A.S. Dugenets. – M.: Forum, 2013. – 288 s.
Dugenets, A.S. Administrativno-yurisdiktsionnyy protsess : monografiya / A.S. Dugenets. – M .: VNII MVD Rossii, 2003. – 194 c.
Dugenets, A.S., Maslennikov M.Ya. Pravoprimenenie po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh: realii i perspektivy optimizatsii : monografiya / A.S. Dugenets, M.Ya. Maslennikov. – M.: FGKU «VNII MVD Rossii», 2011. – 362 c.
Myshlyaev, N.P. Teoreticheskie i prikladnye osnovy administrativnoy deliktologii: avtoref. dis. ... dok. yurid. nauk / N.P. Myshlyaev. – M., 2004. – 56 c.
Rogacheva, O.S. Effektivnost' norm administrativno-deliktnogo prava: avtoref. dis. ... dok. yurid. nauk / O.S. Rogacheva. – Voronezh., 2012. – 56 c.
Rogacheva, O.S. Pokazateli kachestva administrativno-deliktnogo zakona sub'ekta Rossiyskoy Federatsii i effektivnost' ego realizatsii (na primere Zakona Voronezhskoy oblasti «Ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh na territorii Voronezhskoy oblasti») / O.S. Rogacheva // Vestnik Voronezhskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriya: Pravo. – 2011.-№ 2 (11). – S. 288-297.
Serkov, P.P. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost': problemy i puti sovershenstvovaniya : avtoref. dis. ... dok. yurid. nauk / P.P. Serkov. – M., 2010. – 45 c.

References (transliteration):
V.D. Plesovskikh Tendentsii razvitiya federal'nogo administrativno-deliktnogo prava i zakonodatel'stva // Pravo i politika.-2012.-12.-C. 1990-1994.
Goncharov V.V. Rol' printsipa tsentralizma i detsentralizatsii v organizatsii i deyatel'nosti gosudarstvennogo apparata v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // NB: Ekonomika, trendy i upravlenie.-2014.-1.-C. 64-75. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4595.2014.1.2020. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/etc/article_2020.html
PUMA. – 1999.-№ 4. – Rev. 1.
Klepikov S.N. Zakonodatel'naya deyatel'nost' sub'ektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii v oblasti ustanovleniya administrativnoy otvetstvennosti: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk / S.N. Klepikov. – Voronezh, 2003. – 240 s.
Sravnitel'nyy analiz zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh Rossiyskoy Federatsii i Respubliki Belarus': (informatsionno-analiticheskiy obzor) : ucheb. posobie. – Volgograd: VA MVD Rossii, 2010. – 121 s.
Yusupov, V.A. Teoriya administrativnogo prava / V.A. Yusupov. – M.: Yurid. lit, 1985. – 160 s.
Volkov, A.M., Dugenets, A.S. Administrativnoe pravo : ucheb. / A.M. Volkov, A.S. Dugenets. – M.: Forum, 2013. – 288 s.
Dugenets, A.S. Administrativno-yurisdiktsionnyy protsess : monografiya / A.S. Dugenets. – M .: VNII MVD Rossii, 2003. – 194 c.
Dugenets, A.S., Maslennikov M.Ya. Pravoprimenenie po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh: realii i perspektivy optimizatsii : monografiya / A.S. Dugenets, M.Ya. Maslennikov. – M.: FGKU «VNII MVD Rossii», 2011. – 362 c.
Myshlyaev, N.P. Teoreticheskie i prikladnye osnovy administrativnoy deliktologii: avtoref. dis. ... dok. yurid. nauk / N.P. Myshlyaev. – M., 2004. – 56 c.
Rogacheva, O.S. Effektivnost' norm administrativno-deliktnogo prava: avtoref. dis. ... dok. yurid. nauk / O.S. Rogacheva. – Voronezh., 2012. – 56 c.
Rogacheva, O.S. Pokazateli kachestva administrativno-deliktnogo zakona sub'ekta Rossiyskoy Federatsii i effektivnost' ego realizatsii (na primere Zakona Voronezhskoy oblasti «Ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh na territorii Voronezhskoy oblasti») / O.S. Rogacheva // Vestnik Voronezhskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriya: Pravo. – 2011.-№ 2 (11). – S. 288-297.
Serkov, P.P. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost': problemy i puti sovershenstvovaniya : avtoref. dis. ... dok. yurid. nauk / P.P. Serkov. – M., 2010. – 45 c.

Reference:

Panshin, D.L., Dresvyannikova, E.A.. Period and procedure for the implementation of decisions imposing fines in administrative offence cases. // Administrative and municipal law. – 2014. – № 8. – P. 797-800. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.8.9110.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.8.9110

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: It is recognized in the modern administrative legal practice on payment of fines that there is a sixty-days period for the voluntary payment. However, this is not correct. In this article the authors pay attention to the periods when a person may voluntarily implement the decision, and the period when the decision is enforced by a competent official. As a general rule based upon part 1 of Art. 32.2 of the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation there is a sixty-days period for the voluntary payment of the decision imposing fine in an administrative offence case. That is, there is need for a document proving payment of fine, as well as the information of its payment in the databases. At the same time, no one pays attention to Chapter 31 of the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation directly providing that a decision on administrative offence case is obligatory for implementation from the moment, when it enters into force. It should be implemented by a judge, official body or an official, who has issued the relevant decision, and the decision should be sent for implementation within three days period, when it should be transferred to an official competent to implement it, and this requirement is not fully conformed to, so the principle of inevitability of punishment.

Keywords: implementation, proceedings, suspension, extension, period, administrative, offence, decision, body, competent.

Contact information: Panshin, Denis Leonidovich, 142008, Russia, Moskovskaya oblast, Domodedovo, mkrn. Aviatsionnyi, ul. Pikhtovaya, 3.

References:
Dokuchaeva T.V. Proizvodstvo po zhalobam ob osparivanii postanovleniy organov, dolzhnostnykh lits po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // LEX RUSSICA (RUSSKIY ZAKON). - 2004. - 1. - C. 202 - 217.
Prizhennikova A.N. Sostoyanie pravovogo regulirovaniya administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva: puti resheniya. // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 5. - C. 70 - 85. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8739.html
Kurakin A.V. Kompetentsiya politsii v sfere realizatsii zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 28 - 48. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8841.html
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30 dekabrya 2001 g. № 195-FZ (v red. Federal'nykh zakonov RF № 43-FZ ot 5 aprelya 2013 g.; № 49-FZ ot 5 aprelya 2013 g.; №98-FZ ot 7 maya 2013 g.) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. – 2002. – № 1 (chast' I). – St. 1.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 24 marta 2005 g. №5 «O nekotorykh voprosakh, voznikayushchikh u sudov pri primenenii Kodeksa RF ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh» // Rossiyskaya gazeta. – 2005. – № 80. – 19 apr.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 02 oktyabrya 2007 g. №229-FZ «Ob ispolnitel'nom proizvodstve» (v red. Federal'nogo zakona ot 5 aprelya 2013 g. №49-FZ) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. – 2007. – №41. – St. 4849.

References (transliteration):
Dokuchaeva T.V. Proizvodstvo po zhalobam ob osparivanii postanovleniy organov, dolzhnostnykh lits po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // LEX RUSSICA (RUSSKIY ZAKON). - 2004. - 1. - C. 202 - 217.
Prizhennikova A.N. Sostoyanie pravovogo regulirovaniya administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva: puti resheniya. // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 5. - C. 70 - 85. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8739.html
Kurakin A.V. Kompetentsiya politsii v sfere realizatsii zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 28 - 48. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8841.html
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30 dekabrya 2001 g. № 195-FZ (v red. Federal'nykh zakonov RF № 43-FZ ot 5 aprelya 2013 g.; № 49-FZ ot 5 aprelya 2013 g.; №98-FZ ot 7 maya 2013 g.) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. – 2002. – № 1 (chast' I). – St. 1.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 24 marta 2005 g. №5 «O nekotorykh voprosakh, voznikayushchikh u sudov pri primenenii Kodeksa RF ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh» // Rossiyskaya gazeta. – 2005. – № 80. – 19 apr.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 02 oktyabrya 2007 g. №229-FZ «Ob ispolnitel'nom proizvodstve» (v red. Federal'nogo zakona ot 5 aprelya 2013 g. №49-FZ) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. – 2007. – №41. – St. 4849.

Reference:

Babayan, K.A.. Principles of proof in administrative jurisdiction activities of the customs bodies. // Administrative and municipal law. – 2014. – № 7. – P. 680-688. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.7.12202.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.7.12202

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The object of studies includes combination of legal norms, theoretical provisions and aspects of practical activity defining the principles of activities of customs bodies officials regarding evidence and proof in the administrative offences proceedings. The immediate object of the studies includes both the norms of administrative procedural law and the norms of material law regulating the relations, which appear in the relating regarding the movement of goods and vehicles through the customs border of the Customs Union. The theoretical basis for the study was formed with the provisions of the theory of proof, administrative process and other procedural branches of law, as well as of the customs law. The article also involves analysis of some aspects of law-enforcement activities of structural divisions and officials of the customs bodies, taking part in the process of proof on administrative offences cases. In the process of studies the author used dialectic method of scientific cognition, reflecting the interrelation between theory and practice, general theoretical methods: deduction, analysis, synthesis, analogy. The author also involved method of comparative legal studies. The issues regarding the principles of procedural proof in administrative offence cases within the competence of the customs bodies did not previously form an object for independent studies. The conclusions are as follows: the author provides classification of the administrative procedural proof with due respect to the specific features of administrative jurisdiction activities of the customs bodies — the adversarial nature of proof in administrative jurisdiction activities of the customs bodies in relation with the judicial proof (viewing the cases on concealment of goods from customs control under Art. 16.1 p.2 of the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation), judicial challenging of decisions of the customs bodies on administrative offences cases; there is need to clarify the list of persons, for whom there are special conditions for the application of injunctions on administrative offences cases and administrative responsibility. It is also offered to amend the legislation in order to include the principle of fairness in part of making decisions on administrative offence cases. There is also need to widen the scope of competence of tax bodies for initiation and resolution of cases regarding violation of the procedure for the international automobile transportation through the state border of the Russian Federation. There is need to clarify the procedural status of the representative of an organization or an individual entrepreneur in the process of examination of premises and territories, as well as objects and documents there in the process of implementation of various types of state control (supervision) by the customs bodies, since the requirements to the evidence are analogous to those for typical evidence on administrative offences cases.

Keywords: process of proof, administrative jurisdiction process, violations of customs rules, principles of proof, adversarial procedure, evidence, customs bodies, customs control, administrative offences, customs work.

Contact information: Babayan, Karen Artemovich, 140009, Russia, Moskovskaya oblast, Lyubertsy, Komsomolskiy prt, 2.

References:
Strigunova N.Yu. Dokazyvanie po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v oblasti tamozhennogo dela v gosudarstvakh-chlenakh Tamozhennogo soyuza EvrAzES (sravnitel'no-pravovoy analiz) // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 10. - C. 980 - 985. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.10.9765.
Lazareva V. A. Problemy dokazyvaniya v sovremennom ugolovnom protsesse Rossii. Samara: Samar. un-t, 2007. 303 s
Ozhegov S. I. Slovar' russkogo yazyka. M.: Russkiy yazyk, 1991. 915 s.
Populyarnyy yuridicheskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar' / Pod red. O. E. Kutafina, V. A. Tumanova, I. V. Shmarova. M.: Bol'shaya Rossiyskaya entsiklopediya, 2000. 796 s.
Davidovich V. E. Sotsial'naya spravedlivost': ideal i printsip deyatel'nosti. M.: Izd-vo polit. lit., 1989. 256 s.
Abdulaev M. I., Komarov S. A. Problemy teorii gosudarstva i prava: Ucheb. SPb.: Piter, 2003. 576 s.
Administrativno-protsessual'noe pravo: Kurs lektsiy / Pod red. I. Sh. Kilyaskhanova. M.: YuNITI-DANA, Zakon i pravo, 2004. 400 s.
Petrukhin I. L. Ot inkvizitsii — k sostyazatel'nosti // Gosudarstvo i pravo. M.: Nauka, 2003. №
S. 28—36. 7. Lazareva V. A. Vliyanie sostyazatel'nosti ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva na ponyatiya teorii dokazatel'stv // Yuridicheskiy analiticheskiy zhurnal. Samara: Izd-vo Samar. un-ta, 2006. № 1. S. 14—19.

References (transliteration):
Strigunova N.Yu. Dokazyvanie po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v oblasti tamozhennogo dela v gosudarstvakh-chlenakh Tamozhennogo soyuza EvrAzES (sravnitel'no-pravovoy analiz) // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 10. - C. 980 - 985. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.10.9765.
Lazareva V. A. Problemy dokazyvaniya v sovremennom ugolovnom protsesse Rossii. Samara: Samar. un-t, 2007. 303 s
Ozhegov S. I. Slovar' russkogo yazyka. M.: Russkiy yazyk, 1991. 915 s.
Populyarnyy yuridicheskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar' / Pod red. O. E. Kutafina, V. A. Tumanova, I. V. Shmarova. M.: Bol'shaya Rossiyskaya entsiklopediya, 2000. 796 s.
Davidovich V. E. Sotsial'naya spravedlivost': ideal i printsip deyatel'nosti. M.: Izd-vo polit. lit., 1989. 256 s.
Abdulaev M. I., Komarov S. A. Problemy teorii gosudarstva i prava: Ucheb. SPb.: Piter, 2003. 576 s.
Administrativno-protsessual'noe pravo: Kurs lektsiy / Pod red. I. Sh. Kilyaskhanova. M.: YuNITI-DANA, Zakon i pravo, 2004. 400 s.
Petrukhin I. L. Ot inkvizitsii — k sostyazatel'nosti // Gosudarstvo i pravo. M.: Nauka, 2003. №
S. 28—36. 7. Lazareva V. A. Vliyanie sostyazatel'nosti ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva na ponyatiya teorii dokazatel'stv // Yuridicheskiy analiticheskiy zhurnal. Samara: Izd-vo Samar. un-ta, 2006. № 1. S. 14—19.

Reference:

Volchenko, T.I.. On improvement of administrative legal mechanism for the international cooperation of the customs bodies of the Russian Federation in the proceedings on administrative offences cases. // Administrative and municipal law. – 2014. – № 7. – P. 673-679. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.7.12209.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.7.12209

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The article concerns innovations in the administrative legal regulation of the international cooperation in the sphere of customs bodies of the Russian Federation in the administrative offence proceedings under the amended Chapter 29.1 of the Administrative Offences Code “Legal Aid on Administrative Offences Cases”. The author pays attention to the absence of legal definition of the term “legal aid on administrative offences cases”, that is why for the purpose of scientific studies of the definition of this term, the author analyzes the definitions of international legal aid and legal aid on criminal cases. The article also provides for the causes for the legislative provision of this form of international cooperation in the administrative offences proceedings. In addition, the author analyzes the specific features of provision of legal aid on administrative offences cases in regard to the activities of the customs bodies of the Russian Federation. The methodological basis for the study is formed with the dialectic materialism, and the system of general and specific scientific methods, which is based upon it, including: formal logical method, systemic method, method of comparative legal studies, etc. The author provides a definition of the term “legal aid on administrative offences cases”, offering to introduce into the scientific turnover the term “legal aid in the process of administrative offences proceedings by the customs bodies of the Russian Federation”. In addition based upon the study the author formulates the conclusion that provision of legal aid on administrative offences cases is an element of administrative process ( proceedings on administrative offences cases) in the activities of customs bodies of the Russian Federation.

Keywords: legal aid, international cooperation, provision of legal aid, customs bodies, administrative offences, reciprocal principle, international treaty, proceedings on a case, customs offences.

Contact information: Volchenko, Tatiana Igorevna, 347900, Russia, Rostovskaya oblast, Taganrog, Mariupolskoe shosse, 27b.

References:
Shikunova O.G. O sovershenstvovanii pravovykh mekhanizmov mezhdunarodnogo sotrudnichestva organov vnutrennikh del Rossiyskoy Federatsii po okazaniyu pravovoy pomoshchi po ugolovnym i administrativnym delam // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo.-2010.-1.-C. 35-39.
Strigunova N.Yu. Dokazyvanie po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v oblasti tamozhennogo dela v gosudarstvakh-chlenakh Tamozhennogo soyuza EvrAzES (sravnitel'no-pravovoy analiz) // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo.-2013.-10.-C. 980-985. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.10.9765.
Postnova D.A. Razvitie teoretiko-pravovykh i organizatsionnykh osnov mezhdunarodnogo sotrudnichestva tamozhennykh organov Rossiyskoy Federatsii pri vyyavlenii i rassledovanii tamozhennykh prestupleniy: dis. kand. yurid. nauk. Moskva, 2006. – 286 s.
Feoktistova E.E. Mezhdunarodnoe sotrudnichestvo organov predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya po ugolovnym delam: protsessual'no-pravovye i kriminalisticheskie aspekty: monografiya. M., 2010. – Rezhim dostupa: SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Novikov A.B. Sovershenstvovanie pravovogo obespecheniya pravookhranitel'noy deyatel'nosti tamozhennykh organov / A.B. Novikov// Vneshnetorgovoe pravo.-2008.-№ 2.-Rezhim dostupa : SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Tabaldieva V.Sh. Pravovaya pomoshch' po ugolovnym delam (po materialam Kyrgyzskoy Respubliki i Rossiyskoy Federatsii): dis. kand. yurid. nauk / V.Sh. Tabaldieva.-M., 1997. – 168 s.
Milinchuk V.V. Institut vzaimnoy pravovoy pomoshchi po ugolovnym delam. Deystvuyushchaya praktika i perspektivy razvitiya. M., 2001.-352 s.
Shlyantsev D.A. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo: kurs lektsiy.-M., 2006.-256 s.
Biryukov P.N. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. Osobennaya chast': uchebnik dlya vuzov / M.V. Andreev, P.N. Biryukov, R.M. Valeev i dr.-M.: Statut, 2010.-624 s.
Kiselev V.G. Pravovaya pomoshch' po ugolovnym delam v dogovorakh SSSR s drugimi sotsialisticheskimi gosudarstvami: dis. kand. yurid. nauk / V.G. Kiselev.-L., 1978. – 167 s.
Lesin A.V. Mezhdunarodnaya pravovaya pomoshch' v deyatel'nosti arbitrazhnykh sudov Rossiyskoy Federatsii (v kontekste mezhdunarodnogo publichnogo prava): dis. kand. yurid. nauk / A.V. Lesin.-Tyumen', 2003. – 202 s.
Szaszy Istvan, International Civil Procedure / Istvan Szaszy // A Comparative Study. Akademial Kiado.-Budapest, 1967. – 742 p.
O ratifikatsii Soglasheniya o pravovoy pomoshchi i vzaimodeystvii tamozhennykh organov gosudarstv-chlenov tamozhennogo soyuza po ugolovnym delam i delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh: feder. zakon ot 07 fev. 2011 g. № 13-FZ // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva RF.-2011.-№ 7.-st. 910.
Reshenie Mezhgosudarstvennogo Soveta EvrAzES ot 05.07.2010 № 50 «O mezhdunarodnykh dogovorakh Tamozhennogo soyuza v sfere sotrudnichestva po ugolovnym i administrativnym delam». – Rezhim dostupa: SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
O vnesenii izmeneniy v Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii i Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v svyazi s sovershenstvovaniem gosudarstvennogo upravleniya v oblasti protivodeystviya korruptsii: feder. zakon ot 04 maya 2011 g. № 97-FZ // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva RF.-2011.-№ 19.-st. 2714

References (transliteration):
Shikunova O.G. O sovershenstvovanii pravovykh mekhanizmov mezhdunarodnogo sotrudnichestva organov vnutrennikh del Rossiyskoy Federatsii po okazaniyu pravovoy pomoshchi po ugolovnym i administrativnym delam // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo.-2010.-1.-C. 35-39.
Strigunova N.Yu. Dokazyvanie po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v oblasti tamozhennogo dela v gosudarstvakh-chlenakh Tamozhennogo soyuza EvrAzES (sravnitel'no-pravovoy analiz) // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo.-2013.-10.-C. 980-985. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.10.9765.
Postnova D.A. Razvitie teoretiko-pravovykh i organizatsionnykh osnov mezhdunarodnogo sotrudnichestva tamozhennykh organov Rossiyskoy Federatsii pri vyyavlenii i rassledovanii tamozhennykh prestupleniy: dis. kand. yurid. nauk. Moskva, 2006. – 286 s.
Feoktistova E.E. Mezhdunarodnoe sotrudnichestvo organov predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya po ugolovnym delam: protsessual'no-pravovye i kriminalisticheskie aspekty: monografiya. M., 2010. – Rezhim dostupa: SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Novikov A.B. Sovershenstvovanie pravovogo obespecheniya pravookhranitel'noy deyatel'nosti tamozhennykh organov / A.B. Novikov// Vneshnetorgovoe pravo.-2008.-№ 2.-Rezhim dostupa : SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Tabaldieva V.Sh. Pravovaya pomoshch' po ugolovnym delam (po materialam Kyrgyzskoy Respubliki i Rossiyskoy Federatsii): dis. kand. yurid. nauk / V.Sh. Tabaldieva.-M., 1997. – 168 s.
Milinchuk V.V. Institut vzaimnoy pravovoy pomoshchi po ugolovnym delam. Deystvuyushchaya praktika i perspektivy razvitiya. M., 2001.-352 s.
Shlyantsev D.A. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo: kurs lektsiy.-M., 2006.-256 s.
Biryukov P.N. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. Osobennaya chast': uchebnik dlya vuzov / M.V. Andreev, P.N. Biryukov, R.M. Valeev i dr.-M.: Statut, 2010.-624 s.
Kiselev V.G. Pravovaya pomoshch' po ugolovnym delam v dogovorakh SSSR s drugimi sotsialisticheskimi gosudarstvami: dis. kand. yurid. nauk / V.G. Kiselev.-L., 1978. – 167 s.
Lesin A.V. Mezhdunarodnaya pravovaya pomoshch' v deyatel'nosti arbitrazhnykh sudov Rossiyskoy Federatsii (v kontekste mezhdunarodnogo publichnogo prava): dis. kand. yurid. nauk / A.V. Lesin.-Tyumen', 2003. – 202 s.
Szaszy Istvan, International Civil Procedure / Istvan Szaszy // A Comparative Study. Akademial Kiado.-Budapest, 1967. – 742 p.
O ratifikatsii Soglasheniya o pravovoy pomoshchi i vzaimodeystvii tamozhennykh organov gosudarstv-chlenov tamozhennogo soyuza po ugolovnym delam i delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh: feder. zakon ot 07 fev. 2011 g. № 13-FZ // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva RF.-2011.-№ 7.-st. 910.
Reshenie Mezhgosudarstvennogo Soveta EvrAzES ot 05.07.2010 № 50 «O mezhdunarodnykh dogovorakh Tamozhennogo soyuza v sfere sotrudnichestva po ugolovnym i administrativnym delam». – Rezhim dostupa: SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
O vnesenii izmeneniy v Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii i Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v svyazi s sovershenstvovaniem gosudarstvennogo upravleniya v oblasti protivodeystviya korruptsii: feder. zakon ot 04 maya 2011 g. № 97-FZ // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva RF.-2011.-№ 19.-st. 2714

Reference:

Vinokurov, A.Y.. On the issue of identifying the term “prosecutor” when implementing the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation. // Administrative and municipal law. – 2014. – № 7. – P. 665-672. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.7.10569.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.7.10569

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The object of studies in this article involves social relations, which are formed in the process of application by the prosecutor of the provisions of the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation regarding competence of prosecutors as participants in the administrative offences cases. The author analyses the meaning of the term “prosecutor” within the context of implementation by the prosecutors of the specific competences provided for them in the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation both in the process of application of means of administrative influence by the administrative jurisdiction bodies and within the framework of participation of prosecutors in the proceedings on the administrative offence cases. The conclusion is made on the need to amend the current legislation, and the author provides specific phrasing for the innovations. In the process of analysis the author mostly applied logical method and method of comparative legal studies within the context of comparison of the norms of the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation and the Federal Law “On Prosecution in the Russian Federation”. The scientific novelty of the article is due to the fact that the author has provided in-depth analysis of the norms of the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation containing mentions of the Prosecutor as an official and corresponding norms of the Federal Law “On Prosecution in the Russian Federation”, since this term covers a rather wide range of prosecution officials. The immediate result of the study involves new phrasings for the provisions of the said legislative acts.

Keywords: prosecutor, prosecutor status, prosecutor competence, initiating a case, proceedings on a case, prosecutor supervision, protest on a decision, administrative prosecution, supervising prosecutor, administrative offence.

Contact information: Vinokurov, Aleksandr Yurievich, 117463, Russia, Moskva, proezd Karamzina, d.1, k.1, kv. 355.

References:
Teterina O. Vozbuzhdenie del ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Zakonnost'. 2007. № 10.
Vinokurov K. Vynesenie prokurorom postanovleniya o vozbuzhdenii proizvodstva po delu ob administrativnom pravonarushenii // Zakonnost'. 2003. № 1.
Ergashev E.R. O problemakh normativnogo regulirovaniya primeneniya postanovleniya o vozbuzhdenii administrativnogo proizvodstva kak akta prokurorskogo reagirovaniya // Biznes, Menedzhment i pravo. 2012. № 2.
Vinokurov K.Yu. Prokurorskiy nadzor za zakonnost'yu resheniy, prinimaemykh organami administrativnoy yurisdiktsii (problemy realizatsii Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh: monografiya. M.: Izd-vo MNEPU, 2002.
Vinokurov A.Yu., Vinokurov Yu.E. O novom vzglyade na polnomochiya prokurora, svyazannye s primeneniem Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2012. 3 5.
Subnova N.V. Opredelenie prokurora ob otkaze v vozbuzhdenii dela ob administrativnom pravonarushenii // Zakonnost'. 2011. № 1.
Vinokurov A.Yu. "Faktor sderzhivaniya" v nadzornoy deyatel'nosti prokurora // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2011. № 3.
Vinokurov A.Yu. "Faktor sderzhivaniya" i effektivnost' deyatel'nosti prokuratury // Aktual'nye voprosy rossiyskogo prava. Vyp. 27. M.: MosGU, 2013.

References (transliteration):
Teterina O. Vozbuzhdenie del ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Zakonnost'. 2007. № 10.
Vinokurov K. Vynesenie prokurorom postanovleniya o vozbuzhdenii proizvodstva po delu ob administrativnom pravonarushenii // Zakonnost'. 2003. № 1.
Ergashev E.R. O problemakh normativnogo regulirovaniya primeneniya postanovleniya o vozbuzhdenii administrativnogo proizvodstva kak akta prokurorskogo reagirovaniya // Biznes, Menedzhment i pravo. 2012. № 2.
Vinokurov K.Yu. Prokurorskiy nadzor za zakonnost'yu resheniy, prinimaemykh organami administrativnoy yurisdiktsii (problemy realizatsii Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh: monografiya. M.: Izd-vo MNEPU, 2002.
Vinokurov A.Yu., Vinokurov Yu.E. O novom vzglyade na polnomochiya prokurora, svyazannye s primeneniem Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2012. 3 5.
Subnova N.V. Opredelenie prokurora ob otkaze v vozbuzhdenii dela ob administrativnom pravonarushenii // Zakonnost'. 2011. № 1.
Vinokurov A.Yu. "Faktor sderzhivaniya" v nadzornoy deyatel'nosti prokurora // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2011. № 3.
Vinokurov A.Yu. "Faktor sderzhivaniya" i effektivnost' deyatel'nosti prokuratury // Aktual'nye voprosy rossiyskogo prava. Vyp. 27. M.: MosGU, 2013.

Reference:

Serov, A.S.. On the issue of legal status of a person towards whom the proceedings on administrative offence case are implemented. // Administrative and municipal law. – 2014. – № 5. – P. 425-429. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.5.11734.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.5.11734

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The studies of the administrative legal position of the participants of proceedings on administrative offence cases are quite topical. It is due to a whole range of circumstances, one of which is the fact that for all of the branches of law the legal position of a subject of law is key, revealing the main legal institutions. Additionally, the development of the Russian legislation on administrative offences is characterized with certain difficulties and contradictions. That is why, the studies of administrative positions of the participants of the proceedings on administrative offence cases may reveal a number of contradictions, serving as obstacles in the way for achieving the goals of the proceedings on administrative offences cases. All of these and a number of other circumstances provide for the need to improve the norms of administrative law, defining the legal position of the participants of the proceedings on administrative offences cases. The methodological basis for the scientific article was formed by the current achievements of the theory of cognition. In the process of studies the author used general philosophical, theoretical and empiric methods (dialectics, systemic method, analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, observation, modeling), traditional legal methods ( formal logic method), and methods typical for specific sociological studies (statistical, expert evaluation, etc.). The issue of subjects of the branch of law is one of the most topical and complicated ones in the legal science. Its correct resolution influences the object and method of legal regulation, clear definition of the addressees of the legal norms, amount of their rights and obligations, limitations to the application of legal norms in the relevant discipline and its principles. The studies devoted to the subjects of administrative law facilitate the development of recommendations for the legislative and law-enforcement activities, assisting development of recommendations for legislative and law-enforcement activities, they are also necessary for the organization of the scientific work of scientists specializing in administrative law.

Keywords: status, positions, rights, obligations, responsibility, guarantees, regulation, coercion, sanction, influence.

Contact information: Serov, Aleksandr Sergeevich, 111395, Russia, Moskva, ul. Yunosti, 5.

References:
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V., Tregubova E.V. Konstitutsionnoe pravo na provedenie mirnykh sobraniy, mitingov, demonstratsiy, shestviy i piketirovaniya i administrativnaya otvetstvennost' kak sredstvo ego obespecheniya // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya.-2013.-8.-C. 82-105. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.8.9955. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_9955.html
Kurakin A.V. Kompetentsiya politsii v sfere realizatsii zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya.-2013.-4.-C. 28-48. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.4.8841. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8841.html
Kurakin A.V., Badulin A.D., Tregubova E.V. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' za pravonarusheniya na rynke alkogolya i rol' politsii v ee realizatsii // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya.-2013.-10.-C. 28-74. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.10.10151. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_10151.html
Yakimov A.Yu. Status sub'ekta prava (teoreticheskie voprosy) // Gosudarstvo i pravo. – 2003. – № 4.
Maslennikov M.Ya. Proizvodstvo po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v organakh militsii.-Tver', 1992.
Voevodin L.D. Yuridicheskiy status lichnosti v Rossii.-M., 1997.
Dyad'kin O.N. Pravovoy status litsa, privlekaemogo k administrativnoy otvetstvennosti (po materialam administrativnoy praktiki organov vnutrennikh del): Dis. … kand. yurid. nauk.-M., 2001.
Malein N.S. Pravonarushenie: ponyatie, prichiny, otvetstvennost'.-M., 1985.
Mel'nikov V.A. Pravo litsa, privlekaemogo k administrativnoy otvetstvennosti, na zashchitu: Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk.-M., 1995.
Korenev A.P. Administrativnoe pravo Rossii. Ch.1.-M., 2002.
Bakhrakh D.N. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost'.-M., 1999.
Astakhov D.V., Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. Administrativno-protsessual'nyy status uchastnikov proizvodstva po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh. – Domodedovo, VIPK MVD Rossii, 2006.
Alekhin A.P., Kozlov Yu.M. Administrativnoe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Ch 1.-M., 1994.
Serov A.S. Administrativno-pravovoe polozhenie advokata v proizvodstve po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2013. - 5. - C. 307 - 311. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.5.10220.
Serov A.S. Status sub'ekta prava i ego realizatsiya v proizvodstve po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2013. - 6. - C. 413 - 421. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.6.10433.
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V., Tregubova E.V. Konstitutsionnoe pravo na provedenie mirnykh sobraniy, mitingov, demonstratsiy, shestviy i piketirovaniya i administrativnaya otvetstvennost' kak sredstvo ego obespecheniya // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 8. - C. 82 - 105. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.8.9955. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_9955.html
Tregubova E.V. Dozvolenie i zapret v administrativnom prave // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 8. - C. 25 - 56. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.8.9953. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_9953.html
E.V. Tregubova Zapreshchayushchie normy
administrativnogo prava. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2011. - 1. - C. 52 - 55.

References (transliteration):
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V., Tregubova E.V. Konstitutsionnoe pravo na provedenie mirnykh sobraniy, mitingov, demonstratsiy, shestviy i piketirovaniya i administrativnaya otvetstvennost' kak sredstvo ego obespecheniya // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya.-2013.-8.-C. 82-105. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.8.9955. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_9955.html
Kurakin A.V. Kompetentsiya politsii v sfere realizatsii zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya.-2013.-4.-C. 28-48. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.4.8841. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8841.html
Kurakin A.V., Badulin A.D., Tregubova E.V. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' za pravonarusheniya na rynke alkogolya i rol' politsii v ee realizatsii // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya.-2013.-10.-C. 28-74. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.10.10151. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_10151.html
Yakimov A.Yu. Status sub'ekta prava (teoreticheskie voprosy) // Gosudarstvo i pravo. – 2003. – № 4.
Maslennikov M.Ya. Proizvodstvo po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v organakh militsii.-Tver', 1992.
Voevodin L.D. Yuridicheskiy status lichnosti v Rossii.-M., 1997.
Dyad'kin O.N. Pravovoy status litsa, privlekaemogo k administrativnoy otvetstvennosti (po materialam administrativnoy praktiki organov vnutrennikh del): Dis. … kand. yurid. nauk.-M., 2001.
Malein N.S. Pravonarushenie: ponyatie, prichiny, otvetstvennost'.-M., 1985.
Mel'nikov V.A. Pravo litsa, privlekaemogo k administrativnoy otvetstvennosti, na zashchitu: Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk.-M., 1995.
Korenev A.P. Administrativnoe pravo Rossii. Ch.1.-M., 2002.
Bakhrakh D.N. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost'.-M., 1999.
Astakhov D.V., Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. Administrativno-protsessual'nyy status uchastnikov proizvodstva po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh. – Domodedovo, VIPK MVD Rossii, 2006.
Alekhin A.P., Kozlov Yu.M. Administrativnoe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Ch 1.-M., 1994.
Serov A.S. Administrativno-pravovoe polozhenie advokata v proizvodstve po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2013. - 5. - C. 307 - 311. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.5.10220.
Serov A.S. Status sub'ekta prava i ego realizatsiya v proizvodstve po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2013. - 6. - C. 413 - 421. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.6.10433.
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V., Tregubova E.V. Konstitutsionnoe pravo na provedenie mirnykh sobraniy, mitingov, demonstratsiy, shestviy i piketirovaniya i administrativnaya otvetstvennost' kak sredstvo ego obespecheniya // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 8. - C. 82 - 105. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.8.9955. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_9955.html
Tregubova E.V. Dozvolenie i zapret v administrativnom prave // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 8. - C. 25 - 56. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.8.9953. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_9953.html
E.V. Tregubova Zapreshchayushchie normy
administrativnogo prava. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2011. - 1. - C. 52 - 55.

Reference:

Prokofiev, K.G.. Subjects of administrative responsibility for the violation of procedure for the organization and holding of gatherings, meetings, demonstrations, walks and picketing. // Administrative and municipal law. – 2014. – № 5. – P. 417-424. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.5.12016.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.5.12016

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The development of democratic principles an institutions of people’s rule takes place in a complicated and contradictory situation. That is why, the state needs to take maximum effort in order to guarantee public order, and to protect the right of people in the process of public political events. In the conditions of political instability in the Russian society the separatist and extremist tendencies are growing. That is why, formation of additional legal and organizational mechanisms for minimizing the defects in the development of the Russian political system is especially topical. The right to organize, hold and participate in meetings, gatherings, demonstrations, walks and picketing is a general democratic an constitutional value. It allows citizens and their associations to take part in the political life of the state, to show their demands to the state and to support their interests within the wide range of social issues. The methodological basis for the scientific article was formed by the current achievements of the theory of cognition. In the process of studies the author used general philosophical, theoretical and empiric methods (dialectics, systemic method, analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, observation, modeling), traditional legal methods ( formal logic method), and methods typical for specific sociological studies (statistical, expert evaluation, etc.). Taking into account the gravity of some administrative offences taking place when holding meetings, gatherings, demonstrations, walks and picketing, it is offered to amend Art. 4.3 “Circumstances aggravating administrative responsibility” of the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation, and include p.7, where it should be stated that an aggravating circumstance for the participant of a public event is use of Nazi attributes and symbols or public demonstration of attributes or symbols of extremist organizations in the course of relevant event.

Keywords: responsibility, offence, elements of an offence, punishment, qualification, meeting, demonstration, walk, picketing, organizer.

Contact information: Prokofiev, Konstantin Georgievich, 111395, Russia, Moskva, ul. Yunosti, d.5.

References:
Alekhin A.P., Karmolitskiy A.A., Kozlov Yu.M. Administrativnoe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii. – M., 1997.
Bakhrakh D.N. Administrativnoe pravo Rossii. – M., 2012.
Veremeenko I., Vorob'ev V., Yakimov A. Mitingi, demonstratsii, sobraniya // Sotsialisticheskaya zakonnost'. – 1989. – № 6.
Ivanovskiy V.V. Uchebnik administrativnogo prava. Politseyskoe pravo. Pravo vnutrennego upravleniya.-Kazan', 1911. 5. Koval' L.V. Administrativno-deliktnoe otnoshenie. – Kiev, 1979. 6. Kozlov Yu.M. Administrativnoe pravo. – M., 2001. – S. 48. 7. Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. Administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya.-M., 2005. 8. Shabalin V.A. Metodologicheskie voprosy pravovedeniya. – M., 1972. 9. Korenev A.P. Administrativnoe pravo Rossii. – M., 2000. 10. Petrov G.I. Administrativno-pravovye otnosheniya. – L., 1972. 11. Sorokin V.D. Administrativno-protsessual'noe pravo.-SPb., 2004. 12. Sivoplyas A.V. Otvetstvennost' za narushenie zakonodatel'stva o poryadke organizatsii i provedenii sobraniy, mitingov, ulichnykh shestviy i demonstratsiy // Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost': obshchie problemy i otraslevye osobennosti.-Vladivostok, 1990. 13. Cheredina N.V. Zashchita politicheskikh prav grazhdan federal'nymi sudami obshchey yurisdiktsii: Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk.-M., 2005.
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V., Tregubova E.V. Konstitutsionnoe pravo na provedenie mirnykh sobraniy, mitingov, demonstratsiy, shestviy i piketirovaniya i administrativnaya otvetstvennost' kak sredstvo ego obespecheniya // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 8. - C. 82 - 105. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.8.9955. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_9955.html
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. K voprosu ob osnovanii administrativnoy otvetstvennosti v rossiyskom prave // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 10. - C. 75 - 88. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.10.10153. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_10153.html
Kurakin A.V., Badulin A.D., Tregubova E.V. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' za pravonarusheniya na rynke alkogolya i rol' politsii v ee realizatsii // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 10. - C. 28 - 74. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.10.10151. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_10151.html
Kurakin A.V. Kompetentsiya politsii v sfere realizatsii zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 28 - 48. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.4.8841. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8841.html

References (transliteration):
Alekhin A.P., Karmolitskiy A.A., Kozlov Yu.M. Administrativnoe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii. – M., 1997.
Bakhrakh D.N. Administrativnoe pravo Rossii. – M., 2012.
Veremeenko I., Vorob'ev V., Yakimov A. Mitingi, demonstratsii, sobraniya // Sotsialisticheskaya zakonnost'. – 1989. – № 6.
Ivanovskiy V.V. Uchebnik administrativnogo prava. Politseyskoe pravo. Pravo vnutrennego upravleniya.-Kazan', 1911. 5. Koval' L.V. Administrativno-deliktnoe otnoshenie. – Kiev, 1979. 6. Kozlov Yu.M. Administrativnoe pravo. – M., 2001. – S. 48. 7. Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. Administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya.-M., 2005. 8. Shabalin V.A. Metodologicheskie voprosy pravovedeniya. – M., 1972. 9. Korenev A.P. Administrativnoe pravo Rossii. – M., 2000. 10. Petrov G.I. Administrativno-pravovye otnosheniya. – L., 1972. 11. Sorokin V.D. Administrativno-protsessual'noe pravo.-SPb., 2004. 12. Sivoplyas A.V. Otvetstvennost' za narushenie zakonodatel'stva o poryadke organizatsii i provedenii sobraniy, mitingov, ulichnykh shestviy i demonstratsiy // Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost': obshchie problemy i otraslevye osobennosti.-Vladivostok, 1990. 13. Cheredina N.V. Zashchita politicheskikh prav grazhdan federal'nymi sudami obshchey yurisdiktsii: Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk.-M., 2005.
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V., Tregubova E.V. Konstitutsionnoe pravo na provedenie mirnykh sobraniy, mitingov, demonstratsiy, shestviy i piketirovaniya i administrativnaya otvetstvennost' kak sredstvo ego obespecheniya // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 8. - C. 82 - 105. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.8.9955. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_9955.html
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. K voprosu ob osnovanii administrativnoy otvetstvennosti v rossiyskom prave // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 10. - C. 75 - 88. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.10.10153. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_10153.html
Kurakin A.V., Badulin A.D., Tregubova E.V. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' za pravonarusheniya na rynke alkogolya i rol' politsii v ee realizatsii // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 10. - C. 28 - 74. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.10.10151. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_10151.html
Kurakin A.V. Kompetentsiya politsii v sfere realizatsii zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 28 - 48. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.4.8841. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8841.html

Reference:

Izyumova, E.S.. Administrative prejudicing of criminal responsibility for the unlawful organization of gambling activities. // Administrative and municipal law. – 2014. – № 4. – P. 325-332. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.4.11299.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.4.11299

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The article is devoted to introduction of the administrative prejudicing in the criminal legislation of Russia. The author provides a constructive analysis of various viewpoints regarding the possibility for the application of administrative prejudicing in the criminal law of Russia. The author also evaluates the problems of applying criminal and administrative responsibility for the unlawful organization of gambling regarding the issue of responsibility of a person, who organizes unlawful gambling, does not receive the profits from it. Within the framework of the study the author turns to the history of the formation of the administrative prejudicing construction in the Russian legislation. Administrative prejudicing is making a person responsible for a crime due to him previously committing an analogous administrative offence. Administrative prejudicing may be applied in two forms. The first form provides that a person, who was previously found guilty for the administrative offence is brought to criminal responsibility for committing the same offence for the second time. The second construction provides for the period of committing repeated offences as a qualifying element. The article contains a proposal for introduction of the administrative prejudicing of criminal responsibility for unlawful organization of gambling activities and introduction of the relevant amendments into the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation and the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, substantiating the need for the said changes. The author also offers to resolve the conflict of laws of criminal and administrative legislation regarding the period for bringing a person to criminal responsibility with due regard for the introduction of the administrative prejudicing construction.

Keywords: administrative prejudicing, unlawful gambling activity, administrative responsibility, conflict of laws, judicial decision, the Criminal Procedural Code, pro et contra, administrative offence, prevention.

Contact information: Izyumova Evgenia Sergeevna, 169600, Russia, Respublika Komi, Pechora, ul. Rusanova, 43-191.

References:
Bezverkhov A.G. Administrativnaya preyuditsial'nost' v ugolovnom zakonodatel'stve Rossii: istoki realii perspektivy. Vestnik Samarskoy gumanitarnoy akademii, Seriya Pravo, 2011. №2 (10).
Borzenkov G.N. Tendentsii i perspektivy razvitiya ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva v XXI veke (opyt sravn.-vrem. analiza) // Ugolovnoe pravo v XXI veke: Materialy Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. M., 2002.
Boskhamdzhieva N.A. Administrativnaya deliktnost' v sisteme ugroz obshchestvennoy bezopasnosti // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2013. N 1.
Gadzhiev G.A. Konstitutsionnye osnovy yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti i konstitutsionno-pravovaya otvetstvennost'// Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, 2014. №1.
Deryuga A.N. Obshchestvennaya opasnost'-priznak administrativnogo pravonarusheniya? // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2011. N 8.
Zyryanov S.M. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' v sisteme publichno-pravovoy otvetstvennosti // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, 2014. №1.
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh [Elektronnyy resurs]: [ot 30.12.2001 № 195-FZ (red. ot 23.07.2013) // «Rossiyskaya gazeta», № 256, 31.12.2001,-Rezhim dostupa: [Konsul'tant plyus]. (Data obrashcheniya 25.02.2014).
Kozlov A.V. O dopustimosti administrativno-pravovoy preyuditsii v ugolovnom zakonodatel'stve Rossii // [Elektronnyy resurs]: Rezhim dostupa: [http://www.hse.ru/data/2013/01/17/1302968925/]. (Data obrashcheniya 25.02.2014).
Kolosova V.I. Administrativnaya preyuditsiya kak sredstvo preduprezhdeniya prestupleniy i sovershenstvovaniya ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. 2011. № 5 (1).
Kuznetsova N.F. Tseli i mekhanizm reformy Ugolovnogo kodeksa // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1992. № 6.
Likholetov A.A. Ugolovno-pravovye i Kriminologicheskie problemy protivodeystviya nezakonnomu igornomu biznesu. Avtoref. Dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. – Saratov, 2013.
Lopashenko N.A. Administrativnoy preyuditsii v ugolovnom prave-net! // Vestnik Akademii General'noy prokuratury Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2011. N 3.
Onokolov Yu.P. Rasshirenie primeneniya administrativnoy preyuditsii povysit preventivnoe vozdeystvie Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh i Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii // «Migratsionnoe pravo». 2013. N 3.
Sapsovich V.D. Uchebnik ugolovnogo prava T.1 vypusk 1, SPb , 1863.
Teoriya gosudarstva i prava: Uchebnik / Pod red. V.K. Babaeva. – M.: Yurist', 2004.
Ugolovnyy kodeks RSFSR [Elektronnyy resurs]: [utv. VS RSFSR 27.10.1960 (red. ot 27.08.1993) // «Svod zakonov RSFSR», t. 8, s. 497,-Rezhim dostupa: [Konsul'tant plyus]. (Data obrashcheniya 25.02.2014).
Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Elektronnyy resurs]: [ot 13.06.1996 № 63-FZ (red. ot 03.02.2014) // «Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF», 17.06.1996, № 25, st. 2954,-Rezhim dostupa: [Konsul'tant plyus]. (Data obrashcheniya 25.02.2014).
Frizen P.D. Administrativno-pravovoe preduprezhdenie otdel'nykh vidov prestupleniy. Dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. – Barnaul, 2004.
Khavronyuk N.I. Administrativnaya preyuditsiya i institut retsidiva s tochki zreniya ugolovnogo prava evropeyskikh stran // [Elektronnyy resurs]: Rezhim dostupa: [http://www.zakon.kz/190761-administrativnaja-prejudicija-i.html]. (Data obrashcheniya 25.02.2014).
Yamasheva E.V. K voprosu o vosstanovlenii instituta administrativnoy preyuditsii v ugolovnom zakone Rossii // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2009. № 10.

References (transliteration):
Bezverkhov A.G. Administrativnaya preyuditsial'nost' v ugolovnom zakonodatel'stve Rossii: istoki realii perspektivy. Vestnik Samarskoy gumanitarnoy akademii, Seriya Pravo, 2011. №2 (10).
Borzenkov G.N. Tendentsii i perspektivy razvitiya ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva v XXI veke (opyt sravn.-vrem. analiza) // Ugolovnoe pravo v XXI veke: Materialy Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. M., 2002.
Boskhamdzhieva N.A. Administrativnaya deliktnost' v sisteme ugroz obshchestvennoy bezopasnosti // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2013. N 1.
Gadzhiev G.A. Konstitutsionnye osnovy yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti i konstitutsionno-pravovaya otvetstvennost'// Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, 2014. №1.
Deryuga A.N. Obshchestvennaya opasnost'-priznak administrativnogo pravonarusheniya? // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2011. N 8.
Zyryanov S.M. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' v sisteme publichno-pravovoy otvetstvennosti // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, 2014. №1.
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh [Elektronnyy resurs]: [ot 30.12.2001 № 195-FZ (red. ot 23.07.2013) // «Rossiyskaya gazeta», № 256, 31.12.2001,-Rezhim dostupa: [Konsul'tant plyus]. (Data obrashcheniya 25.02.2014).
Kozlov A.V. O dopustimosti administrativno-pravovoy preyuditsii v ugolovnom zakonodatel'stve Rossii // [Elektronnyy resurs]: Rezhim dostupa: [http://www.hse.ru/data/2013/01/17/1302968925/]. (Data obrashcheniya 25.02.2014).
Kolosova V.I. Administrativnaya preyuditsiya kak sredstvo preduprezhdeniya prestupleniy i sovershenstvovaniya ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. 2011. № 5 (1).
Kuznetsova N.F. Tseli i mekhanizm reformy Ugolovnogo kodeksa // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1992. № 6.
Likholetov A.A. Ugolovno-pravovye i Kriminologicheskie problemy protivodeystviya nezakonnomu igornomu biznesu. Avtoref. Dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. – Saratov, 2013.
Lopashenko N.A. Administrativnoy preyuditsii v ugolovnom prave-net! // Vestnik Akademii General'noy prokuratury Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2011. N 3.
Onokolov Yu.P. Rasshirenie primeneniya administrativnoy preyuditsii povysit preventivnoe vozdeystvie Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh i Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii // «Migratsionnoe pravo». 2013. N 3.
Sapsovich V.D. Uchebnik ugolovnogo prava T.1 vypusk 1, SPb , 1863.
Teoriya gosudarstva i prava: Uchebnik / Pod red. V.K. Babaeva. – M.: Yurist', 2004.
Ugolovnyy kodeks RSFSR [Elektronnyy resurs]: [utv. VS RSFSR 27.10.1960 (red. ot 27.08.1993) // «Svod zakonov RSFSR», t. 8, s. 497,-Rezhim dostupa: [Konsul'tant plyus]. (Data obrashcheniya 25.02.2014).
Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Elektronnyy resurs]: [ot 13.06.1996 № 63-FZ (red. ot 03.02.2014) // «Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF», 17.06.1996, № 25, st. 2954,-Rezhim dostupa: [Konsul'tant plyus]. (Data obrashcheniya 25.02.2014).
Frizen P.D. Administrativno-pravovoe preduprezhdenie otdel'nykh vidov prestupleniy. Dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. – Barnaul, 2004.
Khavronyuk N.I. Administrativnaya preyuditsiya i institut retsidiva s tochki zreniya ugolovnogo prava evropeyskikh stran // [Elektronnyy resurs]: Rezhim dostupa: [http://www.zakon.kz/190761-administrativnaja-prejudicija-i.html]. (Data obrashcheniya 25.02.2014).
Yamasheva E.V. K voprosu o vosstanovlenii instituta administrativnoy preyuditsii v ugolovnom zakone Rossii // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2009. № 10.

Reference:

Konstantinova, L.V.. Improvement of the legal regulation of the proceedings on administrative offence cases within the competence of the customs bodies within the framework of the functioning Customs Union. // Administrative and municipal law. – 2014. – № 3. – P. 234-240. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.3.11122.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.3.11122

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The article concerns topical issues regarding proceedings on administrative offence cases within the competence of the customs bodies within the framework of the functioning Customs Union. The author analyzes the administrative legislation of the Member States of the Customs Union regarding violation of customs rules in the sphere of procedure for initiation of cases on failure to deliver the goods. It is noted that the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation establishes responsibility for the failure to deliver the goods carried in accordance with the customs transit no matter what customs body defines the place of delivery and whether the place where the goods should be delivered to is situated in the territory of the Russian Federation or in the territory of the Party. However, since the Republic of Belarus and the Republic of Kazakhstan still did not take measures for the unification of their administrative legislation, it forms prerequisites for the situations when persons, who have committed violations of the requirements of the customs legislation of the Customs Union of the Russian Federation may avoid responsibility and have the sustainable schemes for avoiding payment of the customs fees.

Keywords: unification of legislation, delivery of goods, carrier, the Customs Union, administrative offences, customs transit, administrative responsibility, legal regulation, customs bodies, transit.

Contact information: Konstantinova Larisa Valentinovna, 121087, Russia, Moskva, ul. Novozavodskaya, 11/5.

References:
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii 24 marta 2005 g. № 5 «O nekotorykh voprosakh, voznikayushchikh u sudov pri primenenii kodeksa rossiyskoy federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh». Abzats 3 p. 14 (v red. Postanovleniy Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 25.05.2006 № 12, ot 11.11.2008 № 23, ot 10.06.2010 №13, ot 09.02.2012 № 3). [Elektronnyy resurs]. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus». 7. Poryadok deystviy tamozhennykh organov gosudarstv – chlenov Tamozhennogo soyuza v sluchae otsutstviya svedeniy o dostavke tovarov, perevozimykh v sootvetstvii s tamozhennoy protseduroy tamozhennogo tranzita, libo polucheniya svedeniy ob ikh nedostavke. Utverzhden Protokolom rabochey vstrechi rukovoditeley tamozhennykh sluzhb Respubliki Belarus', Respubliki Kazakhstan i Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 21.09.2011. [Elektronnyy resurs]. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Kodeks Respubliki Kazakhstan ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh. Prinyat zakonom Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 30 yanvarya 2001 g. № 155-II. [Elektronnyy resurs]. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Kodeks Respubliki Kazakhstan o tamozhennom dele v Respublike Kazakhstan. Prinyat zakonom Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 30 iyunya 2010 g. № 296-IV, zaregistrirovan v Natsional'nom reestre pravovykh aktov Respubliki Belarus' 11 yanvarya 2007 g. № 2/1301. [Elektronnyy resurs]. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Kodeks Respubliki Belarus' ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh. Prinyat zakonom Respubliki Belarus' ot 21 aprelya 2003 g. № 194-Z, zaregistrirovan v Natsional'nom reestre pravovykh aktov Respubliki Belarus' 20 maya 2003 g. № 2/946. [Elektronnyy resurs]. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Dogovor ob osobennostyakh ugolovnoy i administrativnoy otvetstvennosti za narusheniya tamozhennogo zakonodatel'stva Tamozhennogo soyuza i gosudarstv – chlenov Tamozhennogo soyuza ot 05.06.2010. Utverzhden resheniem Mezhgosudarstvennogo soveta Evraziyskogo ekonomicheskogo soobshchestva ot 05.06.2010 № 50 «O mezhdunarodnykh dogovorakh Tamozhennogo soyuza v sfere sotrudnichestva po ugolovnym i administrativnym delam», ratifitsirovan Federal'nym zakonom ot 05.04.2011 № 59-FZ, vstupil v silu dlya Rossiyskoy Federatsii s 30 dekabrya 2011 goda. [Elektronnyy resurs]. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Federal'nyy zakon ot 27.11.2012 № 311-FZ «O tamozhennom regulirovanii v Rossiyskoy Federatsii». [Elektronnyy resurs]. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Tamozhennyy kodeks Respubliki Belarus'. Prinyat zakonom Respubliki Belarus' ot 4 yanvarya 2007 g. № 204-Z, zaregistrirovan v Natsional'nom reestre pravovykh aktov Respubliki Belarus' 11 yanvarya 2007 g. № 2/1301. [Elektronnyy resurs]. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Voronina N.A. Soyuznoe gosudarstvo Rossiya – Belarus': opyt pravovogo regulirovaniya // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. - 2013. - 3. - C. 52 - 67. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.3.9061. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wl/article_9061.html
Vasil'ev I.V., Karpov V.A. Aktual'nye problemy effektivnosti funktsionirovaniya mekhanizmov regulirovaniya Tamozhennogo soyuza // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2013. - 5. - C. 26 - 34. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2013.5.9577.
Moshkina N.A. Realizatsiya interesov gosudarstv v usloviyakh integratsii (na primere tamozhennogo soyuza Rossii, Belorussii i Kazakhstana) // NB: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2012. - 1. - C. 80 - 91. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_32.html
Ershova I.V. Gosudarstvennoe regulirovanie tsen v usloviyakh ekonomicheskoy integratsii // Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie. - 2014. - 1. - C. 110 - 119. DOI: 10.7256/2310-0508.2014.1.10019.

References (transliteration):
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii 24 marta 2005 g. № 5 «O nekotorykh voprosakh, voznikayushchikh u sudov pri primenenii kodeksa rossiyskoy federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh». Abzats 3 p. 14 (v red. Postanovleniy Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 25.05.2006 № 12, ot 11.11.2008 № 23, ot 10.06.2010 №13, ot 09.02.2012 № 3). [Elektronnyy resurs]. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus». 7. Poryadok deystviy tamozhennykh organov gosudarstv – chlenov Tamozhennogo soyuza v sluchae otsutstviya svedeniy o dostavke tovarov, perevozimykh v sootvetstvii s tamozhennoy protseduroy tamozhennogo tranzita, libo polucheniya svedeniy ob ikh nedostavke. Utverzhden Protokolom rabochey vstrechi rukovoditeley tamozhennykh sluzhb Respubliki Belarus', Respubliki Kazakhstan i Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 21.09.2011. [Elektronnyy resurs]. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Kodeks Respubliki Kazakhstan ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh. Prinyat zakonom Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 30 yanvarya 2001 g. № 155-II. [Elektronnyy resurs]. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Kodeks Respubliki Kazakhstan o tamozhennom dele v Respublike Kazakhstan. Prinyat zakonom Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 30 iyunya 2010 g. № 296-IV, zaregistrirovan v Natsional'nom reestre pravovykh aktov Respubliki Belarus' 11 yanvarya 2007 g. № 2/1301. [Elektronnyy resurs]. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Kodeks Respubliki Belarus' ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh. Prinyat zakonom Respubliki Belarus' ot 21 aprelya 2003 g. № 194-Z, zaregistrirovan v Natsional'nom reestre pravovykh aktov Respubliki Belarus' 20 maya 2003 g. № 2/946. [Elektronnyy resurs]. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Dogovor ob osobennostyakh ugolovnoy i administrativnoy otvetstvennosti za narusheniya tamozhennogo zakonodatel'stva Tamozhennogo soyuza i gosudarstv – chlenov Tamozhennogo soyuza ot 05.06.2010. Utverzhden resheniem Mezhgosudarstvennogo soveta Evraziyskogo ekonomicheskogo soobshchestva ot 05.06.2010 № 50 «O mezhdunarodnykh dogovorakh Tamozhennogo soyuza v sfere sotrudnichestva po ugolovnym i administrativnym delam», ratifitsirovan Federal'nym zakonom ot 05.04.2011 № 59-FZ, vstupil v silu dlya Rossiyskoy Federatsii s 30 dekabrya 2011 goda. [Elektronnyy resurs]. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Federal'nyy zakon ot 27.11.2012 № 311-FZ «O tamozhennom regulirovanii v Rossiyskoy Federatsii». [Elektronnyy resurs]. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Tamozhennyy kodeks Respubliki Belarus'. Prinyat zakonom Respubliki Belarus' ot 4 yanvarya 2007 g. № 204-Z, zaregistrirovan v Natsional'nom reestre pravovykh aktov Respubliki Belarus' 11 yanvarya 2007 g. № 2/1301. [Elektronnyy resurs]. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Voronina N.A. Soyuznoe gosudarstvo Rossiya – Belarus': opyt pravovogo regulirovaniya // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. - 2013. - 3. - C. 52 - 67. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.3.9061. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wl/article_9061.html
Vasil'ev I.V., Karpov V.A. Aktual'nye problemy effektivnosti funktsionirovaniya mekhanizmov regulirovaniya Tamozhennogo soyuza // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2013. - 5. - C. 26 - 34. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2013.5.9577.
Moshkina N.A. Realizatsiya interesov gosudarstv v usloviyakh integratsii (na primere tamozhennogo soyuza Rossii, Belorussii i Kazakhstana) // NB: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2012. - 1. - C. 80 - 91. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_32.html
Ershova I.V. Gosudarstvennoe regulirovanie tsen v usloviyakh ekonomicheskoy integratsii // Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie. - 2014. - 1. - C. 110 - 119. DOI: 10.7256/2310-0508.2014.1.10019.

Reference:

Serov, A.S.. Administrative procedural guarantees of participants in the proceedings in the administrative offence cases. // Administrative and municipal law. – 2014. – № 3. – P. 225-233. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.3.11175.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.3.11175

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The study of administrative legal position of the participants in the administrative offences cases shows that the problem of guarantees of rights and lawful interests of a person in the proceedings on administrative offences cases has several main aspects regarding the proceedings on the cases of administrative offences; application of administrative coercion measures in general, activities of the state regarding guarantees of rights and lawful interests of the state in the administrative law sphere. In the Russian Federation the system of state protection of human rights and basic freedoms is established and it included the rights and freedoms of a victim of an administrative offence. In the process of development of administrative legislation the activities of state bodies and officials implementing proceedings on administrative offence cases there was shift from the principle of protection of rights and interests of the state, society and individual. The methodological basis for the work was formed by the modern achievements of the cognitive theory. In the process of studies the author used general philosophical, theoretical and empiric methods (dialectics, systemic method, analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, observation, modeling), traditional legal methods ( formal logic method), and methods typical for specific sociological studies (statistical, expert evaluation, etc.). The legal position of the participants of the proceedings on the administrative offences cases is characterized by a complex of rights and obligations, which are based upon the constitutional rights and obligations of an individual, having its own specificities, additional rights and obligations. Additionally, the legal position of the participants of the administrative offence cases includes legal responsibility, which takes place in cases of non-performance or undue performance of their obligations.

Keywords: guarantee, process, participant, status, regulation, coercion, organization, proceedings, stage, person.

Contact information: Serov, Aleksandr Sergeevich, 111395, Russia, Moskva , ul. Yunosti, d.5.

References:
V.D. Plesovskikh Tendentsii razvitiya federal'nogo administrativno-deliktnogo prava i zakonodatel'stva // Pravo i politika.-2012.-12.-C. 1990-1994.
Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V. Administrativnyy protsess i ego realizatsii v deyatel'nosti politsii // NB: Rossiyskoe politseyskoe pravo.-2013.-4.-C. 1-44. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4218.2013.4.9250. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_9250.html
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. Administrativnyy protsess i ego realizatsiya v deyatel'nosti politsii // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'.-2013.-3.-C. 155-170. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.3.8995.
Yampol'skaya Ts.A. O sub'ektivnykh pravakh sovetskikh grazhdan i ikh garantiyakh // Voprosy sovetskogo gosudarstvennogo prava.-M., 1975.
Filatova A.V. Garantii administrativnoy otvetstvennosti grazhdan: Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk.-Saratov, 2003.
Shergin A.P. Problemy administrativno-deliktnogo prava // Gosudarstvo i pravo.-1994.-№ 8-9.
Sevryugin V.E. Problemy administrativnogo prava.-Tyumen', 1994.
Rabinovich P.M. Uprochnenie zakonnosti-zakonomernost' sotsializma. Voprosy teorii i metodologii.-L'vov, 1975.
Skitovich V. Protsessual'nye osobennosti rassmotreniya del po zhalobam na deystviya administrativnykh organov i dolzhnostnykh lits // Sovetskaya yustitsiya.-1985.-№ 11.
Patyulin V.A. Gosudarstvo i lichnost' v SSSR (problemy vzaimootnosheniy).-M., 1968.
Novikov V.P. Fizicheskie i yuridicheskie litsa kak poterpevshie po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh: Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk.-M., 2004.
Nedbaylo P.E. Sistema yuridicheskikh garantiy primeneniya sovetskikh pravovykh norm // Pravovedenie.-1981.-№ 3.
Mordovets A.S. Sotsial'no-yuridicheskiy mekhanizm obespecheniya prav cheloveka i grazhdanina.-Saratov, 1996.
Mitskevich A.V. Sub'ekty sovetskogo prava.-M., 1962.
Luchin V.O. Realizatsiya konstitutsionnykh norm: obshchee i osobennoe // Konstitutsionnaya reforma v SSSR: aktual'nye problemy.-M ., 1991.
Korenev A.P. Normy administrativnogo prava i ikh primenenie.-M., 1978.
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. Aktual'nye problemy administrativnogo prava. – M., 2013.
Dyuryagin I.Ya. Primenenie norm sovetskogo prava.-Sverdlovsk, 1973.
Ivanov V.A. Administrativno-pravovye garantii neprikosnovennosti lichnosti.-M., 1971.
Vitruk N.V. Pravovoy status lichnosti v SSSR.-M., 1985.
Voevodin L.D. Yuridicheskiy status lichnosti v Rossii.-M., 1997.
Aleksandrov S.A. Pravovye garantii vozmeshcheniya ushcherba v ugolovnom protsesse.-Gor'kiy, 1976.
Bobrova N.A., Zrazhevskaya T.D. Otvetstvennost' v sisteme garantiy konstitutsionnykh norm.-Voronezh, 1985.
D.A. Lipinskiy. Pravonarushenie kak fakticheskoe osnovanie yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti. // Pravo i politika.-2013.-№ 2.-C. 208-217. DOI: .10.7256/1811-9018.2013.02.

References (transliteration):
V.D. Plesovskikh Tendentsii razvitiya federal'nogo administrativno-deliktnogo prava i zakonodatel'stva // Pravo i politika.-2012.-12.-C. 1990-1994.
Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V. Administrativnyy protsess i ego realizatsii v deyatel'nosti politsii // NB: Rossiyskoe politseyskoe pravo.-2013.-4.-C. 1-44. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4218.2013.4.9250. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_9250.html
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. Administrativnyy protsess i ego realizatsiya v deyatel'nosti politsii // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'.-2013.-3.-C. 155-170. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.3.8995.
Yampol'skaya Ts.A. O sub'ektivnykh pravakh sovetskikh grazhdan i ikh garantiyakh // Voprosy sovetskogo gosudarstvennogo prava.-M., 1975.
Filatova A.V. Garantii administrativnoy otvetstvennosti grazhdan: Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk.-Saratov, 2003.
Shergin A.P. Problemy administrativno-deliktnogo prava // Gosudarstvo i pravo.-1994.-№ 8-9.
Sevryugin V.E. Problemy administrativnogo prava.-Tyumen', 1994.
Rabinovich P.M. Uprochnenie zakonnosti-zakonomernost' sotsializma. Voprosy teorii i metodologii.-L'vov, 1975.
Skitovich V. Protsessual'nye osobennosti rassmotreniya del po zhalobam na deystviya administrativnykh organov i dolzhnostnykh lits // Sovetskaya yustitsiya.-1985.-№ 11.
Patyulin V.A. Gosudarstvo i lichnost' v SSSR (problemy vzaimootnosheniy).-M., 1968.
Novikov V.P. Fizicheskie i yuridicheskie litsa kak poterpevshie po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh: Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk.-M., 2004.
Nedbaylo P.E. Sistema yuridicheskikh garantiy primeneniya sovetskikh pravovykh norm // Pravovedenie.-1981.-№ 3.
Mordovets A.S. Sotsial'no-yuridicheskiy mekhanizm obespecheniya prav cheloveka i grazhdanina.-Saratov, 1996.
Mitskevich A.V. Sub'ekty sovetskogo prava.-M., 1962.
Luchin V.O. Realizatsiya konstitutsionnykh norm: obshchee i osobennoe // Konstitutsionnaya reforma v SSSR: aktual'nye problemy.-M ., 1991.
Korenev A.P. Normy administrativnogo prava i ikh primenenie.-M., 1978.
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. Aktual'nye problemy administrativnogo prava. – M., 2013.
Dyuryagin I.Ya. Primenenie norm sovetskogo prava.-Sverdlovsk, 1973.
Ivanov V.A. Administrativno-pravovye garantii neprikosnovennosti lichnosti.-M., 1971.
Vitruk N.V. Pravovoy status lichnosti v SSSR.-M., 1985.
Voevodin L.D. Yuridicheskiy status lichnosti v Rossii.-M., 1997.
Aleksandrov S.A. Pravovye garantii vozmeshcheniya ushcherba v ugolovnom protsesse.-Gor'kiy, 1976.
Bobrova N.A., Zrazhevskaya T.D. Otvetstvennost' v sisteme garantiy konstitutsionnykh norm.-Voronezh, 1985.
D.A. Lipinskiy. Pravonarushenie kak fakticheskoe osnovanie yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti. // Pravo i politika.-2013.-№ 2.-C. 208-217. DOI: .10.7256/1811-9018.2013.02.

Reference:

Akimova, N.V.. On the issue of efficiency of administrative legal means of fighting offences in the sphere of copyright // Administrative and municipal law. – 2014. – № 2. – P. 119-127. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.2.10665.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.2.10665

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The article concerns specific features of application of administrative legal means for the guarantees of the protection of legal formation of mechanisms for the legal protection of copyright, which would conform with the modern needs. Having analyzed the issue of role and place of administrative coercion within the sphere of fighting offences against copyright and grounds for its application, the author notes that administrative legal preventive measures in the sphere of copyright protection have some positive features, which are due to its comparative ease and fast implementation, allowing for operative reaction to the copyright violations. Additionally, application of administrative legal measures is possible in a number of cases, and in the copyright sphere in particular in a preventive way without the offences, which makes it more efficient towards both natural persons and legal entities. Also, the administrative decisions may be used in future as evidence of copyright violation by a respondent in a civil or an arbitration process. In the process of preparation of this article the author used the comparative legal method, sociological method of systemic analysis, comparative and historical comparative method, and the structural functional method. Discussing efficiency of administrative legal sanctions, it is noted that it depends both at their unavoidable and operative application, and their efficiency, which relates to the amounts of monetary fines. At the same time, the author states that higher sums of administrative fines should be regarded from a fiscal standpoint, that is, these measures should not be aimed at income into federal and regional budgets.

Keywords: copyright, administrative legal sanctions, basis for legal responsibility, administrative coercion, offence, evidence, counteraction, efficiency, convincing, politics.

Contact information: Akimova, Natalia Viktorovna, 117638, Russia, Moskva, ul. Azovskaya, 3.

References:
Agapov A.B. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost'.-M.: Yurayt.2013.
Administrativnoe pravo. Uchebnik /Pod red. Popova L.L.-M.: VELBI. 2008.
Bakhrakh D.N. Administrativnoe pravo Rossii.-M.: Eksmo. 2010.
Bakhrakh D.N., Seregin A.V. Otvetstvennost' za narushenie obshchestvennogo poryadka.-M.: Yurid.lit. 1977.
Gorshenev V.M. Sposoby i formy pravovogo regulirovaniya v sotsialisticheskom obshchestve.-M.1972.
Gorfinkelya V.Ya. Aktual'nye problemy administrativnogo prava. Uchebnik.-M.:Yuniti-Dana.2013.
Uchebnik /Pod red. L.L. Popova. – M.: TK VELBI. 2008.
Konin N.M. Administrativnoe pravo Rossii.-M.: Prospekt.2013.
Maksimov I.V. Sistema administrativnykh nakazaniy po zakonodatel'stvu Rossiyskoy Federatsii.-Saratov. Izd. GOU VPO «Saratovskaya gosudarstvennaya akademiya prava». 2004.
Serkov P.P.Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' v rossiyskom prave. Sovremennoe osmyslenie i novye podkhody. Monografiya. –M.:Infra-M.2012
Truntsevskiy Yu.B. Nepotoplyaemost' piratskogo rynka (Pri kakikh usloviyakh voyna s kontrafaktnoy produktsiey okazhetsya uspeshnoy). Rossiyskaya gazeta. 1999.

References (transliteration):
Agapov A.B. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost'.-M.: Yurayt.2013.
Administrativnoe pravo. Uchebnik /Pod red. Popova L.L.-M.: VELBI. 2008.
Bakhrakh D.N. Administrativnoe pravo Rossii.-M.: Eksmo. 2010.
Bakhrakh D.N., Seregin A.V. Otvetstvennost' za narushenie obshchestvennogo poryadka.-M.: Yurid.lit. 1977.
Gorshenev V.M. Sposoby i formy pravovogo regulirovaniya v sotsialisticheskom obshchestve.-M.1972.
Gorfinkelya V.Ya. Aktual'nye problemy administrativnogo prava. Uchebnik.-M.:Yuniti-Dana.2013.
Uchebnik /Pod red. L.L. Popova. – M.: TK VELBI. 2008.
Konin N.M. Administrativnoe pravo Rossii.-M.: Prospekt.2013.
Maksimov I.V. Sistema administrativnykh nakazaniy po zakonodatel'stvu Rossiyskoy Federatsii.-Saratov. Izd. GOU VPO «Saratovskaya gosudarstvennaya akademiya prava». 2004.
Serkov P.P.Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' v rossiyskom prave. Sovremennoe osmyslenie i novye podkhody. Monografiya. –M.:Infra-M.2012
Truntsevskiy Yu.B. Nepotoplyaemost' piratskogo rynka (Pri kakikh usloviyakh voyna s kontrafaktnoy produktsiey okazhetsya uspeshnoy). Rossiyskaya gazeta. 1999.

Reference:

Panfilov, A.N.. Administrative responsibility for the violations in the sphere of protection of cultural heritage objects in the Russian Federation. // Administrative and municipal law. – 2013. – № 12. – P. 1097-1105. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.12.10210.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.12.10210

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The protective provisions of the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation regarding the responsibility for the violations in the sphere of protection, preservation, and use of cultural heritage objects were amended substantially in 2013. The existing provisions on offences were clarified and new types of offences were introduced, the amounts of fine were enlarged, and there were also changes in the competence of courts regarding administrative offence cases. The article provides analysis of administrative offences in the sphere of protection of historical and cultural heritage objects in the light of the legislative novelties, and the author formulates the propositions for the improvement. Noting the need to amend the material elements of an administrative offence under Art. 7.15 part 2 of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation the author supports the position that harming or destruction of the object of archeological heritage while holding archeological field work may only be committed with direct intent. Accordingly, such acts of persons and officials should be qualified under Art. 243 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.

Keywords: object of cultural heritage, object of archaeological heritage, lands designated for historical and cultural purposes, administrative offence, administrative responsibility, administrative fine, elements of an administrative offence, unlawful act, sanction, confiscation.

Contact information: Panfilov Anatoliy Nikolaevich, 625000, Russia, Tyumen, ul. Respubliki, 29.

References:
Administrativnoe pravo: uchebnik dlya vuzov / D.N. Bakhrakh, B.V. Rossinskiy, Yu.N. Starilov. – 3-e izd., peresmotr. i dop. M.: Norma, 2008.
Bogomyakov I.V. Soderzhanie ponyatiya «zemli istoriko-kul'turnogo naznacheniya» v Zemel'nom kodekse Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Ekologicheskoe pravo. 2011. № 1.
Vakhitov A.K. Administrativno-pravovaya okhrana ob'ektov kul'turnogo naslediya: avtoref. dis. … kand.yurid.nauk: 12.00.14. M., 2007.
Panfilov A.N. Problemy primeneniya mer administrativnoy otvetstvennosti za otdel'nye pravonarusheniya v sfere okhrany ob'ektov kul'turnogo naslediya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2012. № 8.
Panfilov A.N. Okhranitel'nye normy administrativno-deliktnogo zakonodatel'stva sub'ektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii v sfere okhrany ob'ektov kul'turnogo naslediya // Pravo i politika. 2013. №
Rogacheva O.S. Effektivnost' norm administrativno-deliktnogo prava: monografiya. Voronezh: Izdatel'stvo Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2011.
Salishcheva N.G. O nekotorykh tendentsiyakh razvitiya zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnoy otvetstvennosti v Rossii v sovremennyy period // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2009. № 5.
Sumachev A.V. K voprosu o ponyatii kul'turnykh tsennostey i sovershenstvovanii administrativno-pravovogo rezhima ikh okhrany // Pravo i politika. 2012. № 12.

References (transliteration):
Administrativnoe pravo: uchebnik dlya vuzov / D.N. Bakhrakh, B.V. Rossinskiy, Yu.N. Starilov. – 3-e izd., peresmotr. i dop. M.: Norma, 2008.
Bogomyakov I.V. Soderzhanie ponyatiya «zemli istoriko-kul'turnogo naznacheniya» v Zemel'nom kodekse Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Ekologicheskoe pravo. 2011. № 1.
Vakhitov A.K. Administrativno-pravovaya okhrana ob'ektov kul'turnogo naslediya: avtoref. dis. … kand.yurid.nauk: 12.00.14. M., 2007.
Panfilov A.N. Problemy primeneniya mer administrativnoy otvetstvennosti za otdel'nye pravonarusheniya v sfere okhrany ob'ektov kul'turnogo naslediya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2012. № 8.
Panfilov A.N. Okhranitel'nye normy administrativno-deliktnogo zakonodatel'stva sub'ektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii v sfere okhrany ob'ektov kul'turnogo naslediya // Pravo i politika. 2013. №
Rogacheva O.S. Effektivnost' norm administrativno-deliktnogo prava: monografiya. Voronezh: Izdatel'stvo Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2011.
Salishcheva N.G. O nekotorykh tendentsiyakh razvitiya zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnoy otvetstvennosti v Rossii v sovremennyy period // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2009. № 5.
Sumachev A.V. K voprosu o ponyatii kul'turnykh tsennostey i sovershenstvovanii administrativno-pravovogo rezhima ikh okhrany // Pravo i politika. 2012. № 12.

Reference:

Kim, N.I.. On the practice of assignment of an administrative fine for the offences in the sphere of customs. // Administrative and municipal law. – 2013. – № 12. – P. 1092-1096. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.12.10234.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.12.10234

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: T he a rticle i ncludes a nalysis o f t he a mendments i nto t he l egislation o n a dministrative o ffences regarding establishing the amount of an administrative fines, which took place in 2012. Based upon the results of the legal practice of the customs bodies and the courts on the cases regarding administrative responsibility for the offences in the sphere of customs, the author uncovers topical issues regarding assignment of administrative fines f or t he v iolations o f c ustoms r ules. It i s s ubstantiated t hat t he e xisting o rder o f c alculating f ines i n t he many-fold amount compared to the cost of the object of an offence and differentiated depending on the category of persons/entities being offenders causes legal uncertainty and breaches the rights of delinquents. Taking into account the legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, the author makes proposals on the improvement of the norms of the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation in order to establish a unified approach towards establishing the cost of offence objects for the purpose of calculating the amount of fines for customs offences.

Keywords: administrative offence, administrative punishment, administrative fine, violation of customs rules, the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, administrative offence, customs cost, non-declaring, physical persons, the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation.

Contact information: Kim Nikolay Igorevich, 690014, Russia, Vladivostok, prosp. Krasnogo Znameni, 66a

References:
Itogi pravookhranitel'noy deyatel'nosti tamozhennykh organov Rossiyskoy Federatsii za 2012 god [Elektronnyy resurs] / Federal'naya tamozhennaya sluzhba. Rezhim dostupa: http://customs.ru/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=16960:-2012-&catid=55:2011-01-24-16-40-26
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 13.07.2010 № 15-P «Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozheniy chasti pervoy stat'i 188 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii, chasti 4 stat'i 4.5, chasti 1 stat'i 16.2 i chasti 2 stat'i 27.11 Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v svyazi s zhalobami grazhdan V.V. Batalova, L.N. Valuevoy, Z.Ya. Ganievoy, O.A. Krasnoy i I.V. Epova // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2010. № 29. St. 3983.
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 26.11.2012 № 28-P «Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozheniy chasti 1 stat'i 16.2 i chasti 2 stat'i 27.11 Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v svyazi s zhaloboy obshchestva s ogranichennoy otvetstvennost'yu «Avesta» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2012. № 50 (ch. 6). St. 7124.
Postanovlenie Moskovskogo gorodskogo suda ot 13.12.2012 № 4a-2820/12 // Elektronnyy resurs. — SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus».
Reshenie Leningradskogo oblastnogo suda ot 15.11.2011 № 7-848/2011 // Elektronnyy resurs. — SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus».
Sidorov E.I., Khomyakov L.L. Pravovaya kharakteristika i osobennosti primeneniya administrativnykh nakazaniy za narushenie tamozhennykh pravil // Vestnik Rossiyskoy tamozhennoy akademii. 2013. №. 2. S. 20-26.
Kurakin A.V., Badulin A.D., Tregubova E.V. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' za pravonarusheniya na rynke alkogolya i rol' politsii v ee realizatsii // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 10. - C. 28 - 74. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_10151.html

References (transliteration):
Itogi pravookhranitel'noy deyatel'nosti tamozhennykh organov Rossiyskoy Federatsii za 2012 god [Elektronnyy resurs] / Federal'naya tamozhennaya sluzhba. Rezhim dostupa: http://customs.ru/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=16960:-2012-&catid=55:2011-01-24-16-40-26
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 13.07.2010 № 15-P «Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozheniy chasti pervoy stat'i 188 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii, chasti 4 stat'i 4.5, chasti 1 stat'i 16.2 i chasti 2 stat'i 27.11 Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v svyazi s zhalobami grazhdan V.V. Batalova, L.N. Valuevoy, Z.Ya. Ganievoy, O.A. Krasnoy i I.V. Epova // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2010. № 29. St. 3983.
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 26.11.2012 № 28-P «Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozheniy chasti 1 stat'i 16.2 i chasti 2 stat'i 27.11 Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v svyazi s zhaloboy obshchestva s ogranichennoy otvetstvennost'yu «Avesta» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2012. № 50 (ch. 6). St. 7124.
Postanovlenie Moskovskogo gorodskogo suda ot 13.12.2012 № 4a-2820/12 // Elektronnyy resurs. — SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus».
Reshenie Leningradskogo oblastnogo suda ot 15.11.2011 № 7-848/2011 // Elektronnyy resurs. — SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus».
Sidorov E.I., Khomyakov L.L. Pravovaya kharakteristika i osobennosti primeneniya administrativnykh nakazaniy za narushenie tamozhennykh pravil // Vestnik Rossiyskoy tamozhennoy akademii. 2013. №. 2. S. 20-26.
Kurakin A.V., Badulin A.D., Tregubova E.V. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' za pravonarusheniya na rynke alkogolya i rol' politsii v ee realizatsii // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 10. - C. 28 - 74. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_10151.html

Reference:

Panshin, D.L., Dresvyannikova, E.A.. Procedure and period of entry into force of the decisions on administrative offence cases. // Administrative and municipal law. – 2013. – № 12. – P. 1088-1091. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.12.9099.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.12.9099

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The current Russian administrative legislation provides that the decision on the administrative offence case, including those in the sphere of road traffic security, comes into force after ten day period provided for filing appeal and the period starts from the day when the copy of the decision is received by an offender. However, until an offender gets the decision the period for appeal does not start, and therefore, it is hard to establish when in particular the decision shall come into force. The analysis of current arbitration procedural, criminal procedural and civil procedural legislation and judicial practice shows that the decisions in other spheres of procedural law come into force once the period for appeal is over and it is calculated starting from the day when a decision or a judgment was made, and the period for notification and posting are included into the period.

Keywords: code, offence, administrative, arbitration, criminal, civil, procedural, decision, period, service.

Contact information: Panshin Denis Leonidovich, 142008, Russia, Moskovskaya oblast, Domodedovo, mkrn. Aviatsionnyi, ul. Pikhtovaya, 3

References:
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30 dekabrya 2001 g. № 195-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. – 2002. – № 1 (chast' I). – St. 1
Dokuchaeva T.V. Proizvodstvo po zhalobam ob osparivanii postanovleniy organov, dolzhnostnykh lits po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // LEX RUSSICA (RUSSKIY ZAKON). - 2004. - 1. - C. 202 - 217.

References (transliteration):
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30 dekabrya 2001 g. № 195-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. – 2002. – № 1 (chast' I). – St. 1
Dokuchaeva T.V. Proizvodstvo po zhalobam ob osparivanii postanovleniy organov, dolzhnostnykh lits po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // LEX RUSSICA (RUSSKIY ZAKON). - 2004. - 1. - C. 202 - 217.

Reference:

Panshin, D.L.. Some aspects regarding improvement of law-enforcement activities of the State Traffic Safety Inspectorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation when recording administrative offences with technical means of photography, video and filming. // Administrative and municipal law. – 2013. – № 11. – P. 1032-1035. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.11.8860.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.11.8860

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: Russian administrative legislation provides for the possibility of recording an administrative offence by two types of technical means (note to Art. 1.5 of the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation): special technical means having functions of photo-, video- and filming in automatic regime; and simply by photo-, video- and filming means. Currently, the second type of technical means is not regarded as means of administrative offence recording based on which under Art. 2.6.1 of the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation the owner is held responsible. In our opinion it is possible to hold a vehicle owner responsible for committing an offence, which is recorded by technical means of photo -, video- or filming which is not in automatic regime under Art. 28.6 of the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation (without administrative offence protocol). Art. 28.6 of the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation also presupposes that in cases of recording offences with technical means of photo-, video- and filming, which are not specialized technical means (measuring means), and which do not work in automatic regime, a decision on an administrative offence case should be issued.

Keywords: means, video recording, verification, presumption of innocence, owner, administrative regime, administrative regulation, protocol, decision, automatic regime, and means of recording.

Contact information: Panshin, Denis Leonidovich, Russia, 142002, Moskovskaya oblast, g. Domodedovo, mkrn. Aviatsionnyi, ul. Pikhtovaya, d.3.

References:
Prikaz MVD Rossii ot 02 marta 2009 g. №185 «Ob utverzhdenii Administrativnogo reglamenta Ministerstva vnutrennikh del Rossiyskoy Federatsii ispolneniya gosudarstvennoy funktsii po kontrolyu i nadzoru za soblyudeniem uchastnikami dorozhnogo dvizheniya trebovaniy v oblasti obespecheniya bezopasnosti dorozhnogo dvizheniya» (v red. prikaza MVD Rossii ot 13 avgusta 2012 g. №780) // Rossiyskaya gazeta, 2009.-№122. – 7 iyulya.
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30.12.2001 g. № 195-FZ (v red. Federal'nogo zakona ot 05.04.2013 g. №49-FZ) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. – 2002. – № 1 (ch. 1). – St. 1
Kuzina S.V., Kashkina E.V. Administrativnaya deyatel'nost' uchastkovogo upolnomochennogo politsii po profilaktike pravonarusheniy (na primere Leningradskoy oblasti). // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2011. - 2. - C. 19 - 23.

References (transliteration):
Prikaz MVD Rossii ot 02 marta 2009 g. №185 «Ob utverzhdenii Administrativnogo reglamenta Ministerstva vnutrennikh del Rossiyskoy Federatsii ispolneniya gosudarstvennoy funktsii po kontrolyu i nadzoru za soblyudeniem uchastnikami dorozhnogo dvizheniya trebovaniy v oblasti obespecheniya bezopasnosti dorozhnogo dvizheniya» (v red. prikaza MVD Rossii ot 13 avgusta 2012 g. №780) // Rossiyskaya gazeta, 2009.-№122. – 7 iyulya.
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30.12.2001 g. № 195-FZ (v red. Federal'nogo zakona ot 05.04.2013 g. №49-FZ) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. – 2002. – № 1 (ch. 1). – St. 1
Kuzina S.V., Kashkina E.V. Administrativnaya deyatel'nost' uchastkovogo upolnomochennogo politsii po profilaktike pravonarusheniy (na primere Leningradskoy oblasti). // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2011. - 2. - C. 19 - 23.

Reference:

Panshin, D.L.. Some topical issues regarding use of disqualification from driving vehicles as a penalty for administrative offences in the sphere of road traffic // Administrative and municipal law. – 2013. – № 10. – P. 976-979. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.10.9112.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.10.9112

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The cause for the study of the problem of defining the subject of administrative offences in the sphere of road traffic was paragraph 2 of the Decree of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of October 24, 2006 N.18 “On some issues arising before the courts when applying Special Part of the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation” (with amendments of November 11, 2008), where it is stated that the administrative punishment in form of disqualification from driving vehicles under Art. 2.8 of the said Code may be assigned only to those person, having such a right, or those persons, who have lost this right before in accordance with the law. Analysis of the provisions of part 1 of the Article 3.8 of the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation allows to draw a conclusion that deprivation of special right, such as a right to drive vehicles may be applied only to physical persons, who have previously gained such a right by being provided a driver’s permit by the competent state bodies.

Keywords: subject, person, owner, right, driving, user, offence, Plenum, court, Constitution.

Contact information: Panshin, Denis Leonidovich, Russia, 142008, Moskovskaya obl, Domodedovo, mkrn. Aviatsionnyi, ul. Pikhtovaya, d.3.

References:
1. Konventsiya o dorozhnom dvizhenii (Vena, 8 noyabrya 1968 g.). Ot imeni SSSR Konventsiya podpisana 8 noyabrya
1968 g. i ratifitsirovana Ukazom Prezidiuma Verkhovnogo Soveta SSSR ot 29 aprelya 1974 g. № 5938-VIII s ogo-
vorkami i zayavleniyami. Ratifikatsionnaya gramota SSSR sdana na khranenie General'nomu sekretaryu Organi-
zatsii Ob'edinennykh Natsiy 7 iyunya 1974 g. Nastoyashchaya Konventsiya vstupila v silu 21 maya 1977 g. / Sbornik dey-
stvuyushchikh dogovorov, soglasheniy i konventsiy, zaklyuchennykh s inostrannymi gosudarstvami, vyp. XXXIII. —
M., 1979. — S. 385.
2. Kodeks RF ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30 dekabrya 2001 g. № 195-FZ (v red. Federal'nogo za-
kona ot 7 maya 2013 g. № 98-FZ) // SZ RF. — 2002. — № 1 (ch. I) — St. 1.
3. Federal'nyy zakon ot 10 dekabrya 1995 g. № 196-FZ «O bezopasnosti dorozhnogo dvizheniya» // SZ RF. — 1995. —
№ 50. — St. 4873.

References (transliteration):
1. Konventsiya o dorozhnom dvizhenii (Vena, 8 noyabrya 1968 g.). Ot imeni SSSR Konventsiya podpisana 8 noyabrya
1968 g. i ratifitsirovana Ukazom Prezidiuma Verkhovnogo Soveta SSSR ot 29 aprelya 1974 g. № 5938-VIII s ogo-
vorkami i zayavleniyami. Ratifikatsionnaya gramota SSSR sdana na khranenie General'nomu sekretaryu Organi-
zatsii Ob'edinennykh Natsiy 7 iyunya 1974 g. Nastoyashchaya Konventsiya vstupila v silu 21 maya 1977 g. / Sbornik dey-
stvuyushchikh dogovorov, soglasheniy i konventsiy, zaklyuchennykh s inostrannymi gosudarstvami, vyp. XXXIII. —
M., 1979. — S. 385.
2. Kodeks RF ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30 dekabrya 2001 g. № 195-FZ (v red. Federal'nogo za-
kona ot 7 maya 2013 g. № 98-FZ) // SZ RF. — 2002. — № 1 (ch. I) — St. 1.
3. Federal'nyy zakon ot 10 dekabrya 1995 g. № 196-FZ «O bezopasnosti dorozhnogo dvizheniya» // SZ RF. — 1995. —
№ 50. — St. 4873.

Reference:

Panshin, D.L., Dresvyannikova, E.A.. Period and order of implementation of the decision on imposing a fine as an administrative punishment. // Administrative and municipal law. – 2013. – № 9. – P. 898-900. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.9.9099.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.9.9099

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: In the modern administrative practice on payment of fines imposed as administrative punishment it is recognized that the term for voluntary payment lasts 60 days. However, this is not correct. The authors of this article pay attention to the period of time, when, firstly, a person voluntarily pays a fine, and, secondly, when an official enforces payment. As a general rule, Art. 32.2 p.1 of the Administrative Offences Code provides for a 60 days period during which a decision on an administrative fine should be voluntarily implemented. Therefore, there is need for a document proving payment of a fine and information on its payment should be in the relevant information databases. However, no one seems to take into account Chapter 31 of the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation, where it is directly provided that the decision is object to obligatory performance from the moment, when it comes into force. It therefore should be implemented by a judge, body or official, who has made the decision, and in three days period it should be provided to the law enforcement officers, which is not always fully adhered to. Therefore, the principle of inevitability of punishment is not duly implemented.

Keywords: implementation, procedure, extension of payment, suspension of payment, period, administrative, offence, decision, body, competent.

Contact information: Dresvyannikova, Elena Anatolievna, Russia; 142008, Moskovskaya obl., Domodedovo, mkrn Aviatsionnyi, ul. Pikhtovaya, d. 3.

References:
1. Kodeks RF ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30 dekabrya 2001 g. № 195-FZ (v red. Federal'nykh zako-
nov RF № 43-FZ ot 5 aprelya 2013 g.; № 49-FZ ot 5 aprelya 2013 g.; №98-FZ ot 7 maya 2013 g.) // SZ RF. — 2002. —
№ 1 (ch. I). — St. 1.
2. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo suda RF ot 24 marta 2005 g. № 5 «O nekotorykh voprosakh, voznikayushchikh u
sudov pri primenenii Kodeksa RF ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh» // Rossiyskaya gazeta. — 2005. —
№ 80. — 19 apr.
3. Federal'nyy zakon ot 02 oktyabrya 2007 g. № 229-FZ «Ob ispolnitel'nom proizvodstve» (v red. Federal'no-
go zakona ot 5 aprelya 2013 g. № 49-FZ) // SZ RF. — 2007. — №41. — St. 4849.
4. Dokuchaeva T.V. Proizvodstvo po zhalobam ob osparivanii postanovleniy organov, dolzhnostnykh lits po de-
lam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // LEX RUSSICA (RUSSKIY ZAKON). — 2004. № 1. — C. 202-217.
5. Prizhennikova A.N. Sostoyanie pravovogo regulirovaniya administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva: puti reshe-
niya. // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. — 2013. — № 5. — C. 70-85 // URL:
http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8739.html
6. Kurakin A.V. Kompetentsiya politsii v sfere realizatsii zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravona-
rusheniyakh // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. — 2013. — № 4. — C. 28-48 // URL:
http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8841.html

References (transliteration):
1. Kodeks RF ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30 dekabrya 2001 g. № 195-FZ (v red. Federal'nykh zako-
nov RF № 43-FZ ot 5 aprelya 2013 g.; № 49-FZ ot 5 aprelya 2013 g.; №98-FZ ot 7 maya 2013 g.) // SZ RF. — 2002. —
№ 1 (ch. I). — St. 1.
2. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo suda RF ot 24 marta 2005 g. № 5 «O nekotorykh voprosakh, voznikayushchikh u
sudov pri primenenii Kodeksa RF ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh» // Rossiyskaya gazeta. — 2005. —
№ 80. — 19 apr.
3. Federal'nyy zakon ot 02 oktyabrya 2007 g. № 229-FZ «Ob ispolnitel'nom proizvodstve» (v red. Federal'no-
go zakona ot 5 aprelya 2013 g. № 49-FZ) // SZ RF. — 2007. — №41. — St. 4849.
4. Dokuchaeva T.V. Proizvodstvo po zhalobam ob osparivanii postanovleniy organov, dolzhnostnykh lits po de-
lam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // LEX RUSSICA (RUSSKIY ZAKON). — 2004. № 1. — C. 202-217.
5. Prizhennikova A.N. Sostoyanie pravovogo regulirovaniya administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva: puti reshe-
niya. // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. — 2013. — № 5. — C. 70-85 // URL:
http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8739.html
6. Kurakin A.V. Kompetentsiya politsii v sfere realizatsii zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravona-
rusheniyakh // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. — 2013. — № 4. — C. 28-48 // URL:
http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8841.html

Reference:

Adarchenko. E.O.. Administrative responsibility of legal entities of public law // Administrative and municipal law. – 2013. – № 9. – P. 893-897. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.9.9605.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.9.9605

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation provides for a variety of subjects of administrative responsibility. However, the definition of administrative responsibility is absent in the Code, and it is being an object of an endless scholarly discussion. Taking into account the existence of legal entities of public law, which are not provided for in the Code, it is necessary to single out their type of administrative responsibility. The article contains an analogy between administrative responsibilities of legal entities of public law and officials, since both of them are subjects having public power. Special attention is paid to administrative responsibility of the state and its bodies as a type of legal entities of public law. Administrative responsibility of state corporations is also compared with the administrative responsibility of state bodies, and not the non-commercial organizations, to which they belong.

Keywords: administrative responsibility, legal entity, official, state, executive bodies, state corporation, subjects of administrative law, private law, public law, power.

Contact information: Adarchenko, Ekaterina Olegovna, Russia, 394006,Voronezh, Universitetskaya ploschad, 1.

References:
1. Drago R. Administrativnaya nauka. — M., 1982.
2. Ripinskiy S.Yu. Imushchestvennaya otvetstvennost' gosudarstva za vred, prichinyaemyy predprinimatelyam. —
SPb.: Izd-vo «yuridicheskiy tsentr Press», 2002.
3. Vinnitskiy A.V. Gosudarstvennaya sobstvennost' v administrativnom prave. — M.: Statut, 2010.
4. Chanturiya L.L. Yuridicheskie litsa publichnogo prava: ikh mesto v grazhdanskom prave i osobennosti pravovogo
regulirovaniya // Gosudarstvo i pravo. — 2008. — №3.
5. Konstitutsiya zarubezhnykh gosudarstv: ucheb. posobie / sost. prof. V.V. Maklakov. — M.: Izd-vo BEK, 1999.

References (transliteration):
1. Drago R. Administrativnaya nauka. — M., 1982.
2. Ripinskiy S.Yu. Imushchestvennaya otvetstvennost' gosudarstva za vred, prichinyaemyy predprinimatelyam. —
SPb.: Izd-vo «yuridicheskiy tsentr Press», 2002.
3. Vinnitskiy A.V. Gosudarstvennaya sobstvennost' v administrativnom prave. — M.: Statut, 2010.
4. Chanturiya L.L. Yuridicheskie litsa publichnogo prava: ikh mesto v grazhdanskom prave i osobennosti pravovogo
regulirovaniya // Gosudarstvo i pravo. — 2008. — №3.
5. Konstitutsiya zarubezhnykh gosudarstv: ucheb. posobie / sost. prof. V.V. Maklakov. — M.: Izd-vo BEK, 1999.

Reference:

Nekrasova, T.A.. Social and legal nature and consequences of corruption on the private legal sphere. // Administrative and municipal law. – 2013. – № 9. – P. 885-892. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.9.9580.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.9.9580

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The article includes criminal and criminally-related corruption matters in private legal sphere. The author provides a typology of corruption acts and offences in the private spheres, and she analyzes their consequences. Based upon the above-mentioned study, she formulates proposals for the current legislation.

Keywords: corruption, private legal sphere, consequences of corruption, typology of corruption offences, limitation, control, regulation.

Contact information: Nekrasova, Tatiana Alekseevna, Russia, 117638, Moscow, ul. Azovskaya, d. 2, k. 1.

References:
1. Astanin V.V. Korruptsiya i bor'ba s ney v Rossii vtoroy poloviny XVI-XX vv.: kriminologicheskoe issledova-
nie: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 2001.
2. Pravovye sredstva protivodeystviya korruptsii/ pod obshch. red. Vlasenko N.A. — M., 2012.
3. Kashepov V.P. Korporativnyy shantazh: kvalifikatsiya, otvetstvennost' // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. — 2006. — № 10.
4. Korruptsiya: priroda, proyavleniya, protivodeystvie. Monografiya / otv. red. akademik RAN T.Ya. Khabrieva. —
M.: ID «Yurisprudentsiya», 2012.
5. Kriminologiya: uchebnik / pod red. A.I. Dolgovoy. — 4-e izd., pererab. i dop. — M.: Norma: Infra-M, 2010.
6. Kriminologiya: uchebnik / pod red. V.N. Kudryavtseva i V.E. Eminova. — 4-e izd., pererab. i dop. — M.: Norma,
2009.
7. Kurakin A.V. Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba i korruptsiya. — M., 2009.
8. Lektsii po ekonomike korruptsii: ucheb. posobie / M.I. Levin, E.A. Levina, E.V. Pokatovich (Uchebniki Vysshey
shkoly ekonomiki). — M.: Izdatel'skiy dom Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki, 2011.
9. Pokhmelkin V.V. Sotsial'naya spravedlivost' i ugolovnaya otvetstvennost'. — Krasnoyarsk, 1990.
10. Pravovye sredstva protivodeystviya korruptsii // pod obshch. red. N.A. Vlasenko. — M., 2012.
11. Smirnov G. Firmy–odnodnevki, beregites'! // «EZh-Yurist. — 2012. — № 14.
12. Tagantsev N.S. Ulozhenie o nakazaniyakh ugolovnykh i ispravitel'nykh 1866 g., s dopolneniyami po 1 dekabrya
1881 g. — SPb., 1882.
13. Fedorov A.Yu. Reyderstvo i korruptsiya v organakh sudebnoy vlasti v Rossii // Pravo i obrazovanie. — 2010. — №7.
14. Estrin A.Ya. Vzyatochnichestvo // Trudy kruzhka ugolovnogo prava pri SPb universitete. — SPb., 1913.

References (transliteration):
1. Astanin V.V. Korruptsiya i bor'ba s ney v Rossii vtoroy poloviny XVI-XX vv.: kriminologicheskoe issledova-
nie: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 2001.
2. Pravovye sredstva protivodeystviya korruptsii/ pod obshch. red. Vlasenko N.A. — M., 2012.
3. Kashepov V.P. Korporativnyy shantazh: kvalifikatsiya, otvetstvennost' // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. — 2006. — № 10.
4. Korruptsiya: priroda, proyavleniya, protivodeystvie. Monografiya / otv. red. akademik RAN T.Ya. Khabrieva. —
M.: ID «Yurisprudentsiya», 2012.
5. Kriminologiya: uchebnik / pod red. A.I. Dolgovoy. — 4-e izd., pererab. i dop. — M.: Norma: Infra-M, 2010.
6. Kriminologiya: uchebnik / pod red. V.N. Kudryavtseva i V.E. Eminova. — 4-e izd., pererab. i dop. — M.: Norma,
2009.
7. Kurakin A.V. Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba i korruptsiya. — M., 2009.
8. Lektsii po ekonomike korruptsii: ucheb. posobie / M.I. Levin, E.A. Levina, E.V. Pokatovich (Uchebniki Vysshey
shkoly ekonomiki). — M.: Izdatel'skiy dom Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki, 2011.
9. Pokhmelkin V.V. Sotsial'naya spravedlivost' i ugolovnaya otvetstvennost'. — Krasnoyarsk, 1990.
10. Pravovye sredstva protivodeystviya korruptsii // pod obshch. red. N.A. Vlasenko. — M., 2012.
11. Smirnov G. Firmy–odnodnevki, beregites'! // «EZh-Yurist. — 2012. — № 14.
12. Tagantsev N.S. Ulozhenie o nakazaniyakh ugolovnykh i ispravitel'nykh 1866 g., s dopolneniyami po 1 dekabrya
1881 g. — SPb., 1882.
13. Fedorov A.Yu. Reyderstvo i korruptsiya v organakh sudebnoy vlasti v Rossii // Pravo i obrazovanie. — 2010. — №7.
14. Estrin A.Ya. Vzyatochnichestvo // Trudy kruzhka ugolovnogo prava pri SPb universitete. — SPb., 1913.

Reference:

Shevkoplyas, N.A.. Specific features of administrative legal status of self-regulated organizations in the RussianFederation // Administrative and municipal law. – 2013. – № 9. – P. 867-873. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.9.9564.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.9.9564

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The article contains analysis of normative legal acts on the status of self-regulated organizations. The author presents proposals on improvement of the Russian legislation and formation of a unified approach towards all of the self-regulated organizations in part of providing for their specific features by other federal laws on self-regulation in various spheres of professional activities, establishing the key requirements to standards and rules of professional conduct for self-regulated organizations, administrative responsibility of self-regulated organizations and its officials. The author of the article supposes that above-mentioned measures shall make self-regulated entities in the Russian Federation more efficient by clearer provisions on their legal status in various economic spheres, guaranteeing due control and supervision over the activities of self-regulated organizations and improvement of the quality of their works and services. It shall also allow for a positive influence upon the process of formation of voluntary self-regulation in various economic spheres.

Keywords: self-regulated organization, administrative legal status, legal capability of self-regulated organizations, responsibility of a self-regulated organization, responsibility of officials, administrative responsibility, ability to commit delicts of self-regulated organizations, formation of a self-regulated organization.

Contact information: Shevkoplyas, Natalia Aleksandrovna, Russia, 394006, Voronezh, Universitetskaya ploschad, d. 1.

References:
1. Andreeva L.V., Andronova T.A., Apresova N.G. Rossiyskoe predprinimatel'skoe pravo: uchebnik // pod red.
I.V. Ershovoy, G.D. Otnyukovoy. — M.: Prospekt, 2012.
2. Babaev A.B. Praktika primeneniya Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii chasti pervoy // A.B. Babaev,
R.S. Bevzenko, V.A. Belov, Yu.A. Tarasenko. — M: Yurayt-Izdat, 2009.
3. Bogatskaya S.F. Pravovoe regulirovanie reklamnoy deyatel'nosti: ucheb. posobie. — M.: Akademicheskiy pro-
spektyu, 2007.
4. Borisov A.N. Kommentariy k Federal'nomu zakonu ot 1 dekabrya 2007 g. № 315-FZ «O samoreguliruemykh
organizatsiyakh» // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus», 2008.
5. Magaziner Ya.M. Obshchaya teoriya prava na osnove sovetskogo zakonodatel'stva // Pravovedenie. — 1997. — №4.
6. Mityakin I.V. Administrativno-pravovoe regulirovanie deyatel'nosti samoreguliruemykh organizatsiy v
Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. — 2012. — № 3.
7. Matuzov N.I. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava: kurs lektsiy // pod red. N.I. Matuzova i A.V. Mal'ko. — M.: Yurist',
2009.
8. Morozova I.G. K voprosu o prekrashchenii deyatel'nosti samoreguliruemykh organizatsiy // Zakonodatel'stvo
i ekonomika. — 2012. — № 12.
9. Rossinskiy B.V. Administrativnoe pravo: uchebnik / B.V. Rossinskiy, Yu.N.Starilov. — M.: Norma: Infa-M,
2010.
10. Sungatullina L.A. Organizatsionno-pravovye formy samoreguliruemykh organizatsiy // Nalogi. — 2012. —
№ 35.
11. Khalfina R.O. Obshchee uchenie o pravootnoshenii. — M.: Yur. lit., 1974.

References (transliteration):
1. Andreeva L.V., Andronova T.A., Apresova N.G. Rossiyskoe predprinimatel'skoe pravo: uchebnik // pod red.
I.V. Ershovoy, G.D. Otnyukovoy. — M.: Prospekt, 2012.
2. Babaev A.B. Praktika primeneniya Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii chasti pervoy // A.B. Babaev,
R.S. Bevzenko, V.A. Belov, Yu.A. Tarasenko. — M: Yurayt-Izdat, 2009.
3. Bogatskaya S.F. Pravovoe regulirovanie reklamnoy deyatel'nosti: ucheb. posobie. — M.: Akademicheskiy pro-
spektyu, 2007.
4. Borisov A.N. Kommentariy k Federal'nomu zakonu ot 1 dekabrya 2007 g. № 315-FZ «O samoreguliruemykh
organizatsiyakh» // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus», 2008.
5. Magaziner Ya.M. Obshchaya teoriya prava na osnove sovetskogo zakonodatel'stva // Pravovedenie. — 1997. — №4.
6. Mityakin I.V. Administrativno-pravovoe regulirovanie deyatel'nosti samoreguliruemykh organizatsiy v
Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. — 2012. — № 3.
7. Matuzov N.I. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava: kurs lektsiy // pod red. N.I. Matuzova i A.V. Mal'ko. — M.: Yurist',
2009.
8. Morozova I.G. K voprosu o prekrashchenii deyatel'nosti samoreguliruemykh organizatsiy // Zakonodatel'stvo
i ekonomika. — 2012. — № 12.
9. Rossinskiy B.V. Administrativnoe pravo: uchebnik / B.V. Rossinskiy, Yu.N.Starilov. — M.: Norma: Infa-M,
2010.
10. Sungatullina L.A. Organizatsionno-pravovye formy samoreguliruemykh organizatsiy // Nalogi. — 2012. —
№ 35.
11. Khalfina R.O. Obshchee uchenie o pravootnoshenii. — M.: Yur. lit., 1974.

Reference:

Gadaborsheva, Z.B.. The limitations to the prosecutor supervision in the sphere of implementation of legislation on entrepreneurial activities // Administrative and municipal law. – 2013. – № 8. – P. 843-846. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.8.9282.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.8.9282

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The article concerns theoretical issues regarding limitations to prosecutor, as well as the conditions defining the limitations to the supervision over the compliance to laws in the sphere of entrepreneurial activity. The article presents the analysis of existing scientific views on this issue. The article also contains analysis of topical issues regarding interaction between prosecution and specially empowered state controlling structures.

Keywords: prosecutor, prosecutor supervision, limits to prosecutor supervision, entrepreneurial activity, compliance to law, supervision function, controlling bodies, state control, protest, petition, warning, protocol, case, risk, activity, profit.

Contact information: Gadaborsheva, Zinaida Bekhanovna, Russia, 111395, Moskva, ul Yunosti, d. 5.

References:
1. But N.D., Lar'kov A.N., Palamarchuk A.V. Prokurorskiy nadzor za ispolneniem zakonodatel'stva v sfere za-
shchity prav sub'ektov predprinimatel'skoy deyatel'nosti: nauch.-metod. posobie. — M., 2008.
2. Idilova Zh.N. Prokurorskiy nadzor za ispolneniem zakonodatel'stva o zashchite malogo i srednego pred-
prinimatel'stva: sostoyanie i puti optimizatsii: avtoref. diss. … kand. yurid. nauk. — Ekaterinburg, 2012.
3. Prokurorskiy nadzor: uchebnik dlya vuzov / pod red. A.Ya. Sukhareva. — 4-e izd., pererab. i dop. — M.: Norma,
Infra-M, 2011.
4. Prokurorskiy nadzor: uchebnik dlya bakalavrov / pod obshch. red. Yu.E. Vinokurova. 10-e izd., pererab. i dop. —
M.: Yurayt, 2012.
5. Prokurorskiy nadzor za ispolneniem zakonodatel'stva v sfere ekonomiki: sb. metodich. materialov. — M.:
Akademiya General'noy prokuratury RF, 2010.
6. Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V. Aktual'nye problemy administrativnogo prava. — M., 2013.
7. Yastrebov V.B. Prokurorskiy nadzor: uchebnik dlya studentov yuridicheskikh vuzov i fakul'tetov. — 2-e izd.,
pererab. i dop. — M.: Zertsalo-M, 2012.

References (transliteration):
1. But N.D., Lar'kov A.N., Palamarchuk A.V. Prokurorskiy nadzor za ispolneniem zakonodatel'stva v sfere za-
shchity prav sub'ektov predprinimatel'skoy deyatel'nosti: nauch.-metod. posobie. — M., 2008.
2. Idilova Zh.N. Prokurorskiy nadzor za ispolneniem zakonodatel'stva o zashchite malogo i srednego pred-
prinimatel'stva: sostoyanie i puti optimizatsii: avtoref. diss. … kand. yurid. nauk. — Ekaterinburg, 2012.
3. Prokurorskiy nadzor: uchebnik dlya vuzov / pod red. A.Ya. Sukhareva. — 4-e izd., pererab. i dop. — M.: Norma,
Infra-M, 2011.
4. Prokurorskiy nadzor: uchebnik dlya bakalavrov / pod obshch. red. Yu.E. Vinokurova. 10-e izd., pererab. i dop. —
M.: Yurayt, 2012.
5. Prokurorskiy nadzor za ispolneniem zakonodatel'stva v sfere ekonomiki: sb. metodich. materialov. — M.:
Akademiya General'noy prokuratury RF, 2010.
6. Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V. Aktual'nye problemy administrativnogo prava. — M., 2013.
7. Yastrebov V.B. Prokurorskiy nadzor: uchebnik dlya studentov yuridicheskikh vuzov i fakul'tetov. — 2-e izd.,
pererab. i dop. — M.: Zertsalo-M, 2012.

Reference:

Panshin, D.L., Dresvyanniova, E.A.. The issues of entry into force of the decisions in the administrative cases on offences in the sphere of road traffic safety // Administrative and municipal law. – 2013. – № 8. – P. 831-832. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.8.9099.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.8.9099

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: At the current stage of development of the Russian administrative legislation in the sphere of road traffic safety, the issue of implementation of the principle of inevitability of punishment. Development of normative regulation in the sphere of enforcement of decisions on administrative fines and other administrative punishments is high priority in this sphere. In the opinion of the authors there is a conflict of norms of administrative legislation and enforcement legislation in the sphere of punishments with administrative fines and its enforcement. Firstly, if in 60 days after the court decision came into force (or since the end of the suspension or postponement period for this decision) there is no information on voluntary payment of administrative fine, under Art. 32.2 of the Code on Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation the decision should be transferred for enforcement to the court enforcement officers. Secondly, under Art. 8 of the Federal Law “ On Enforcement Proceeding” provides for the possibility of transfer of decision on administrative fine directly to banks or other credit organizations for payment from the accounts of debtor.

Keywords: enforcement, implementation, decision, term, court enforcement officer, credit, bank, direction, punishment, organ, organization, security, control, decision, fine.

References:
1. Kodeks RF ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30 dekabrya 2001 g. № 195-FZ (v red. Federal'nykh zako-
nov RF № 43-FZ ot 5 aprelya 2013 g.; № 49-FZ ot 5 aprelya 2013 g.; №98-FZ ot 7 maya 2013 g.) // SZ RF. — 2002. —
№ 1 (ch. I).
2. Federal'nyy zakon ot 02 oktyabrya 2007 g. №229-FZ «Ob ispolnitel'nom proizvodstve» (v red. Federal'no-
go zakona ot 5 aprelya 2013 g. №49-FZ) // SZ RF. — 2007. — №41. — St. 4849.

Reference:

But, S.S.. System of administrative legal means for fighting corruptions in the customs bodies of the Russian Federation // Administrative and municipal law. – 2013. – № 8. – P. 8221-824. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.8.9317.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.8.9317

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The article reflects upon the importance of the topical issues in the sphere of fighting against corruption offences, and special attention is paid to the dangers of corruption offences in the customs bodies of the Russian Federation. The author provides delict-based, social and legal characteristics of corruption and uses its legal definition. The article contains evaluation of topical issues and current administrative legal mechanisms for fighting corruption within the state service system in the Russian Federation, as well as of administrative anticorruption legal norms in accordance with the modern legislative tendencies. The author then makes a conclusion on the insufficiency of criminal legal means for the efficient fight against corruption offences, and evaluates the perspectives for the application of administrative legal norms against corruption in the customs bodies of the Russian Federation. As a result of the study, the author draws a conclusion on the formation of the system of administrative legal norms against corruption. The article includes analysis of some Federal Laws and Decrees of the President of the Russian Federation containing anti-corruption provisions. The author offers to develop the provisions of federal anti-corruption legislation in the departmental normative legal acts.

Keywords: corruption, corruption offence, corruption prevention, practice of criminal punishments, customs bodies of the Russian Federation, administrative law, executive bodies, fighting corruption, administrative legal means, legislation.

Contact information: But, Sergey Sergeevich, Russia, 115678, Moskva, ul. Novozavodskaya, d. 11/5.

References:
1. Astanin V.V. Nauchno-prakticheskiy kommentariy k Federal'nomu zakonu ot 25 dekabrya 2008 g. № 273-FZ «O
protivodeystvii korruptsii». — SPb.: «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press», 2009.
2. Strel'nikov K.A. «Voprosy realizatsii Federal'nogo zakona «O protivodeystvii korruptsii» // Yuridiche-
skiy mir. — 2009. — № 3.
3. Spravochnye materialy k zasedaniyu Kollegii FTS Rossii «Tamozhennaya sluzhba Rossiyskoy Federatsii v
2012 godu». — M., 2013.
4. Kurakin A.V. Administrativno-pravovye sredstva preduprezhdeniya i presecheniya korruptsii v sisteme gosu-
darstvennoy sluzhby Rossiyskoy Federatsii: dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk. — Lyubertsy, 2008.
5. Kozlov Yu.M., Ovsyanko D.M., Popov L.L. Administrativnoe pravo: uchebnik. «Yurist'». — M., 2000.
6. Korkunov N.M. Russkoe gosudarstvennoe pravo. — T. 2. Chast' osobennaya. — SPb., 1909. — s. 694.

References (transliteration):
1. Astanin V.V. Nauchno-prakticheskiy kommentariy k Federal'nomu zakonu ot 25 dekabrya 2008 g. № 273-FZ «O
protivodeystvii korruptsii». — SPb.: «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press», 2009.
2. Strel'nikov K.A. «Voprosy realizatsii Federal'nogo zakona «O protivodeystvii korruptsii» // Yuridiche-
skiy mir. — 2009. — № 3.
3. Spravochnye materialy k zasedaniyu Kollegii FTS Rossii «Tamozhennaya sluzhba Rossiyskoy Federatsii v
2012 godu». — M., 2013.
4. Kurakin A.V. Administrativno-pravovye sredstva preduprezhdeniya i presecheniya korruptsii v sisteme gosu-
darstvennoy sluzhby Rossiyskoy Federatsii: dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk. — Lyubertsy, 2008.
5. Kozlov Yu.M., Ovsyanko D.M., Popov L.L. Administrativnoe pravo: uchebnik. «Yurist'». — M., 2000.
6. Korkunov N.M. Russkoe gosudarstvennoe pravo. — T. 2. Chast' osobennaya. — SPb., 1909. — s. 694.

Reference:

Trunov, I.L.. Problems of road traffic rules // Administrative and municipal law. – 2013. – № 8. – P. 797-801. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.8.9369.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.8.9369

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The article concerns the road traffic security issues. The author analyzes current legislation and legal practice, then he offers a number of amendments and changes into the current legislation. It is noted in the article that road traffic security issues are high-priority within the criminal policy of Russia. Statistical analysis of car accidents shows that the number of car accident victims in Russia is among the highest rates in the world, and the offences against the road traffic security causing grave bodily harm and death of people are especially dangerous. Annually 30 to 40 thousand people die in road accidents in Russia, and many of them are children. In the first six months of 2013 according to the State Road Traffic Safety Inspection statistics more than 10 000 people died in road accidents in Russia.

Keywords: road traffic offences, presumption of guilt of a driver; gap impunity, equality under the law, experience of the foreign states, law, transportation, victim, offence, police, harm, rules, security, passenger, pedestrian.

Contact information: Trunov, Igor Leonidovich, Russia, 125080, Moskva, Volokolamskoye shosse, d. 15/22.

References:
1. Zvorygina S.A. Ugolovno-pravovaya kharakteristika spetsial'nogo sub'ekta transportnogo prestupleniya: av-
toref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — Ekaterinburg, 2013.
2. Isaev N.I. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za narushenie Pravil dorozhnogo dvizheniya i ekspluatatsii transport-
nykh sredstv / pod red. N.G. Kadnikova. — M., 2011.
3. Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. Aktual'nye problemy nauki administrativnogo prava. — M., 2011.
4. Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. Aktual'nye problemy administrativnogo prava. — M., 2013.

References (transliteration):
1. Zvorygina S.A. Ugolovno-pravovaya kharakteristika spetsial'nogo sub'ekta transportnogo prestupleniya: av-
toref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — Ekaterinburg, 2013.
2. Isaev N.I. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za narushenie Pravil dorozhnogo dvizheniya i ekspluatatsii transport-
nykh sredstv / pod red. N.G. Kadnikova. — M., 2011.
3. Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. Aktual'nye problemy nauki administrativnogo prava. — M., 2011.
4. Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. Aktual'nye problemy administrativnogo prava. — M., 2013.

Reference:

Astanin, G.V.. Administrative responsibility of insolvency officers in legislations of the Russian Federation and Ukraine: comparative analysis. // Administrative and municipal law. – 2013. – № 7. – P. 753-757. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.7.9038.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.7.9038

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The article includes comparative analysis of the elements of the institution of administrative responsibility of insolvency officers under the current legislations of the Russian Federation and Ukraine. Most of attention is paid to the grounds for administrative responsibility and types of measures of administrative responsibility. The author notes similarities and differences in legislation and law-enforcement practice in two states. The attention is drawn to some topical issues of general theory of administrative responsibility, as applied to bankruptcy (insolvency).

Keywords: insolvency officer, administrative responsibility, administrative offence, bankruptcy, insolvency, sanitation, entrepreneurs, corruption, legal entities, debtor, creditor

Contact information: Astanin, German Viktorovich, Ukraine, 01601, Kyir, ul. Trekhsvyatitelskaya, d. 4.

References:
1. Gorb E.E. Problematika privlecheniya arbitrazhnykh upravlyayushchikh k administrativnoy otvetstvennosti za
narushenie zakonodatel'stva o nesostoyatel'nosti (bankrotstve) // Elektronnoe nauchnoe izdanie «Uchenye
zametki TOGU». 2011. — T. 2. — № 2.
2. Dikhtyar A.I., Volkova N.A. Bankrotstvo: vneshnee upravlenie imushchestvom dolzhnika — yuridicheskogo litsa
(sravnitel'nyy analiz po konkursnomu pravu Rossii i Ukrainy) // Yurist. — 2012. — № 12.
3. Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. Aktual'nye problemy administrativnogo prava. — M., 2013.
4. Luk'yanova E.G. Teoriya protsessual'nogo prava. — M., 2003.
5. Luk'yanets D.N. O protsessual'noy forme administrativnoy otvetstvennosti // Vestnik Zaporozhskogo natsi-
onal'nogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki. — 2012. — № 1.
6. Popova E.N. O standartizatsii deyatel'nosti arbitrazhnogo upravlyayushchego // Predprinimatel'skoe pravo.
Prilozhenie Biznes i pravo v Rossii i za rubezhom. — 2011. — № 3.
7. Shivol'nik N.Sh. Protsedura bankrotstva po pravu Rossii i Ukrainy. — Kiev, 2008.

References (transliteration):
1. Gorb E.E. Problematika privlecheniya arbitrazhnykh upravlyayushchikh k administrativnoy otvetstvennosti za
narushenie zakonodatel'stva o nesostoyatel'nosti (bankrotstve) // Elektronnoe nauchnoe izdanie «Uchenye
zametki TOGU». 2011. — T. 2. — № 2.
2. Dikhtyar A.I., Volkova N.A. Bankrotstvo: vneshnee upravlenie imushchestvom dolzhnika — yuridicheskogo litsa
(sravnitel'nyy analiz po konkursnomu pravu Rossii i Ukrainy) // Yurist. — 2012. — № 12.
3. Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. Aktual'nye problemy administrativnogo prava. — M., 2013.
4. Luk'yanova E.G. Teoriya protsessual'nogo prava. — M., 2003.
5. Luk'yanets D.N. O protsessual'noy forme administrativnoy otvetstvennosti // Vestnik Zaporozhskogo natsi-
onal'nogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki. — 2012. — № 1.
6. Popova E.N. O standartizatsii deyatel'nosti arbitrazhnogo upravlyayushchego // Predprinimatel'skoe pravo.
Prilozhenie Biznes i pravo v Rossii i za rubezhom. — 2011. — № 3.
7. Shivol'nik N.Sh. Protsedura bankrotstva po pravu Rossii i Ukrainy. — Kiev, 2008.

Reference:

Agapov, A.B.. Public coercion or social sanitation… // Administrative and municipal law. – 2013. – № 7. – P. 743-752. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.7.9037.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.7.9037

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The article includes analysis of organizational and legal problems regarding implementation of the administrative responsibility, and it is noted that the current legislation on administrative offences lacks the definition of administrative offence, which is not a positive matter. In scholarly writing administrative responsibility is defined as an administrative coercive measure, which is applied to physical and legal entities. The measures of administrative responsibility are administrative punishments, which include proprietary and non-proprietary limitations of rights, and which are implemented within an established procedural order.

Keywords: public, responsibility, offence, punishment, guilt, guilty, sanitation, sanction, coercion, threat

Contact information: Agapov, Andrey Borisovich, Russia, 123995, Moskva, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9.

References:
1. Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. Aktual'nye problemy administrativnogo prava. — M., 2013.
2. Kozlova L.S., Sadovskaya T.D. Administrativnye reglamenty kak pravovoe sredstvo preduprezhdeniya kor-
ruptsii // Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. — 2010. — № 2.
3. Kurakin A.V. Administrativnoe pravo: problemy teorii i perspektivy razvitiya. — M., 2013.
4. Khabrieva T.Yu. Administrativnye protsedury i administrativnye bar'ery: v poiskakh optimal'noy mode-
li sootnosheniya / V knige Administrativnye protsedury i kontrol' v svete Evropeyskogo opyta / pod red.
T.Ya. Khabrievoy i Zh. Marku. — M., 2011.

References (transliteration):
1. Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. Aktual'nye problemy administrativnogo prava. — M., 2013.
2. Kozlova L.S., Sadovskaya T.D. Administrativnye reglamenty kak pravovoe sredstvo preduprezhdeniya kor-
ruptsii // Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. — 2010. — № 2.
3. Kurakin A.V. Administrativnoe pravo: problemy teorii i perspektivy razvitiya. — M., 2013.
4. Khabrieva T.Yu. Administrativnye protsedury i administrativnye bar'ery: v poiskakh optimal'noy mode-
li sootnosheniya / V knige Administrativnye protsedury i kontrol' v svete Evropeyskogo opyta / pod red.
T.Ya. Khabrievoy i Zh. Marku. — M., 2011.

Reference:

Astanin, V.V.. Fighting corruption: perspective approaches to prevention and compensation of harm. // Administrative and municipal law. – 2013. – № 7. – P. 719-722. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.7.9084.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.7.9084

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The article concerns topical issues of fighting corruption, which are due to the modern legislative, political and legal solutions in the sphere of prophylactics of corruption, and the restorative justice measures. The article includes analysis of defects in law enforcement, regarding many-fold fines assigned as additional punishment to the persons guilty of offences. The author notes the obstacles to the application of civil law measures of responsibility for the corruption-related offences. The existing shortcomings of the anti-corruption legislation is regarded as one of the sources of determination and development of criminal threats (organized crime, drug crime, legalization of money, earned by criminal means), as well as other corruption-related matters (non-payment policy, lack of financing, non-performance under state contracts).The perspective approaches to the prevention of corruption and active application of restorative legal measures are related to correction of legislation, optimization of law-enforcement (including the context of correlation of criminal law and civil law measures).

Keywords: corruption, corruption-related offence, prevention of corruption, shadow economy, compensation of harm, practice of criminal punishment.

Contact information: Astanin, Viktor Viktorovich, Russia, 117638, Moskva, ul. Azovskaya, d. 2, k. 1.

References:
1. Astanin V.V. O razvitii antikorruptsionnoy mirovoy politiki v kontekste bor'by s podkupom v chastnoy
sfere // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. — 2012. — № 4.
2. Astanin V.V. Problemy monitoringa pravoprimeneniya v tselyakh realizatsii antikorruptsionnoy politiki //
Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. — 2012. — № 6.
3. Interv'yu S. Ignat'ev // Vedomosti. — 2013. — 20 fevralya.
4. Kurakin A.V. Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba i korruptsiya. — M., 2010.
5. Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. Administrativnye zaprety kak sredstvo protivodeystviya korruptsii v si-
steme gosudarstvennoy sluzhby. — M., 2011.
6. Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. Aktual'nye problemy administrativnogo prava. — M., 2013.

References (transliteration):
1. Astanin V.V. O razvitii antikorruptsionnoy mirovoy politiki v kontekste bor'by s podkupom v chastnoy
sfere // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. — 2012. — № 4.
2. Astanin V.V. Problemy monitoringa pravoprimeneniya v tselyakh realizatsii antikorruptsionnoy politiki //
Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. — 2012. — № 6.
3. Interv'yu S. Ignat'ev // Vedomosti. — 2013. — 20 fevralya.
4. Kurakin A.V. Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba i korruptsiya. — M., 2010.
5. Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. Administrativnye zaprety kak sredstvo protivodeystviya korruptsii v si-
steme gosudarstvennoy sluzhby. — M., 2011.
6. Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. Aktual'nye problemy administrativnogo prava. — M., 2013.

Reference:

Panshin, D.L.. Some aspects of improvement of administrative legislation in the sphere of guarantees of road traffic security: the order of movement on pedestrian crosswalks. // Administrative and municipal law. – 2013. – № 7. – P. 705-708. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.7.8860.

rubric Административная и муниципальная ответственность

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.7.8860

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: In this article we would like to pay attention to the amendments in the Russian legislation in the sphere of road traffic security guarantees in the sphere of movement on pedestrian crosswalks. In our opinion, there is a number of norms regulating the obligations of participants of the road traffic to follow certain rules on movement (driving) on non-regulated pedestrian crosswalks, but there is no administrative responsibility for violations. The lack of responsibility for the violation of the Road Traffic Rules in this sphere lowers the level of prophylactic and preventive influence on road accidents. Amending the Road Traffic Rules the Government of Russia presumed that it is necessary for the drivers not only to give way to pedestrians and other participants of road traffic, but also to lower the speed up to complete stopping when there are pedestrians or bike riders on the crosswalk. However, there are no legislatively provided measures against violations of this obligation.

Keywords: road traffic, pedestrian, driver, pedestrian crosswalks, clear the way, overdrive, advancing, forced stop, transportation vehicle, collision.

Contact information: Panshin, Denis Leonidovidh, Russia, 142008, Moskovskaya obl., ul. Pikhtovaya, d. 3, m-n. Aviatsionnyi, Domodedovo.

References:
1. Bakhaev A.A. Administrativno-pravovoe regulirovanie dorozhnogo dvizheniya: voprosy bezopasnosti i ot-
vetstvennosti: Avtoref. dis. … kand yurid. nauk. — M., 2009.
2. Bykov A.I. Problemy primeneniya organami vnutrennikh del administrativnykh nakazaniy v oblasti bez-
opasnosti dorozhnogo dvizheniya: avtoref. dis. … kand yurid. nauk. — M., 2010.
3. Vova K.P. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' za pravonarusheniya v oblasti dorozhnogo dvizheniya: avtoref.
dis. … kand yurid. nauk. — Rostov-n/D, 2011.
Publikatsii interneta:
1. Ofitsial'nyy sayt MVD Rossii: http://www.mvd.ru/. (Data obrashcheniya 25 dekabrya 2012 g.).
2. Ofitsial'nyy sayt avtomobil'noy gazety «Klakson» http://www.klaxon.ru/archivepaper. (Data obrashcheniya 25
dekabrya 2012 g.).
3. Ofitsial'nyy sayt vserossiyskoy ezhemesyachnoy gazety «STOP-gazeta». http://www.stopgazeta.ru/news/gibdd/
obrashchenie_nilova. (Data obrashcheniya 25 dekabrya 2012 g.).
4. Ofitsial'nyy sayt GIBDD MVD Rossii: http://www.gibdd.ru/. (Data obrashcheniya 25 dekabrya 2012 g.).

References (transliteration):
1. Bakhaev A.A. Administrativno-pravovoe regulirovanie dorozhnogo dvizheniya: voprosy bezopasnosti i ot-
vetstvennosti: Avtoref. dis. … kand yurid. nauk. — M., 2009.
2. Bykov A.I. Problemy primeneniya organami vnutrennikh del administrativnykh nakazaniy v oblasti bez-
opasnosti dorozhnogo dvizheniya: avtoref. dis. … kand yurid. nauk. — M., 2010.
3. Vova K.P. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' za pravonarusheniya v oblasti dorozhnogo dvizheniya: avtoref.
dis. … kand yurid. nauk. — Rostov-n/D, 2011.
Publikatsii interneta:
1. Ofitsial'nyy sayt MVD Rossii: http://www.mvd.ru/. (Data obrashcheniya 25 dekabrya 2012 g.).
2. Ofitsial'nyy sayt avtomobil'noy gazety «Klakson» http://www.klaxon.ru/archivepaper. (Data obrashcheniya 25
dekabrya 2012 g.).
3. Ofitsial'nyy sayt vserossiyskoy ezhemesyachnoy gazety «STOP-gazeta». http://www.stopgazeta.ru/news/gibdd/
obrashchenie_nilova. (Data obrashcheniya 25 dekabrya 2012 g.).
4. Ofitsial'nyy sayt GIBDD MVD Rossii: http://www.gibdd.ru/. (Data obrashcheniya 25 dekabrya 2012 g.).