Abstract: One of the key findings of this study is the fact that tribunals serve as an alternative to the traditional method of judicial control - supervision of public administration. The article examines the legal nature and the essential characteristics of tribunals. The author considers the characteristics of tribunals and the way they should be understood. The author identifies certain features of tribunals, and these elements are also discussed. The general scientific methods of cognition such as the methods of analysis, the comparative methods, the systems and structural methods, the legal and technical research methods form the methodological basis of the article. Tribunals supervision remains an important guarantee of regulation and circumscription of their functioning. The author discusses the relevant features which should be normal for any supervisory body. Lastly, the author demonstrates a short review of the debates relating to the scope of tribunal jurisdiction, and some of their drawbacks. These elements should provide an over-arching supervision over a tribunal structure.

Keywords: fact-finding, judicial review, administrative tribunals, justification of decisions, ultimate decisions, legal force of decisions, appeal, merits review, conciliation, procedural impropriety

References:
Justice All Souls Review. 2011. S. 221.
Deytar ―The Tribunalisation of Justice in India‖ in Corder (ed) Comparing Administrative Justice Across the Commonwealth. 2007. S. 296.
Wade & Forsyth Administrative Law. 2012.
Schwartz & Wade Legal Control of Government. 1999.
Keyn Judicial Review in the Age of Tribunals in Forsyth, Elliott, Jhaveri, Ramsden & Hill Effective Judicial Review: A Cornerstone of Good Governance. 2010. S. 493.
Govender Administrative Appeals Tribunals‖ in Comparing Administrative Justice. S. 77.
Keyn Administrativnoe pravo. S. 390.
Farmer Tribunals and Government. 1974. S. 184.
S1 of the Constitution of the United States

References (transliteration):
Justice All Souls Review. 2011. S. 221.
Deytar ―The Tribunalisation of Justice in India‖ in Corder (ed) Comparing Administrative Justice Across the Commonwealth. 2007. S. 296.
Wade & Forsyth Administrative Law. 2012.
Schwartz & Wade Legal Control of Government. 1999.
Keyn Judicial Review in the Age of Tribunals in Forsyth, Elliott, Jhaveri, Ramsden & Hill Effective Judicial Review: A Cornerstone of Good Governance. 2010. S. 493.
Govender Administrative Appeals Tribunals‖ in Comparing Administrative Justice. S. 77.
Keyn Administrativnoe pravo. S. 390.
Farmer Tribunals and Government. 1974. S. 184.
S1 of the Constitution of the United States

Abstract: Actualization of the legislative principles is one of the conditions for the efficient state regulation. The goal of this article is to analyze the current principle of enforcement proceedings and to formulate propositions for their improvement. In the course of his studies the author draws a conclusion on the absence of need and expediency for providing in the Federal Law “On Enforcement Proceedings” for the general legal principles of lawfulness, respect for dignity of a person and obligation of timely enforcement acts and measures. The author also provides for the novel principles of enforcement proceedings (compared to the current Federal Law), such as: information transparency on identification and property of a debtor; supremacy of law, support of voluntary performance; permissive nature of enforcement proceedings for the creditor. The principle of information transparency is directly connected to the formation of public registers of enforcement and debtor property. The author is convinced that such a public register may become an economically efficient instrument allowing for greater trust in economic relations, lowering the risks evaluation in conclusion of contracts between the parties, curtailing the number of enforcement proceedings, and lowering the costs of judicial proceedings.

Keywords: enforcement proceedings, legislative principles, court enforcement officer, level of trust, proprietary immunity, public register, information transparency, supremacy of law, liability, court.

Contact information: Shevchuk, Polina Pavlovna, Russia, 119017, Moskva, ul. Malaya Ordynka, d. 17.

References:
1. Administrativno-protsessual'noe pravo Rossii / I.V. Panova. — 3-e izd., peresmotr. — M.: Norma:
INFRA-M, 2011.
2. Gal'perin M.L. Pravovaya politika i printsipy ispolnitel'nogo proizvodstva // Zakon. — 2011. — № 7.
3. Demichev A.A. Printsipy ispolnitel'nogo prava po Proektu Ispolnitel'nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federa-
tsii // Ispolnitel'noe pravo. — 2005. — № 1.
4. Dzhukha O.V. Printsipy administrativno-yurisdiktsionnogo protsessa: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. —
Rostov-n/D, 2011.
5. Kommentariy k Federal'nomu zakonu «Ob ispolnitel'nom proizvodstve» (s postateynymi materialami)
(postateynyy) (Valeev D.Kh.) // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
6. Kommentariy k Federal'nomu zakonu ot 8 avgusta 2001 g. № 129-FZ «O gosudarstvennoy registratsii yuridi-
cheskikh lits i individual'nykh predprinimateley» (postateynyy) (Kukharenko T.A., Nikolaeva E.A., Kartasho-
va Yu.A., Guseva T.A. ) (pod red. T.A. Gusevoy) // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
7. Lourenso P.M. Novye zakonodatel'nye polozheniya Dekreta-zakona ot 20 noyabrya 2008 g. № 226/2008: usile-
nie roli portugal'skogo agenta po ispolneniyu i sozdanie Komissii po effektivnosti ispolnitel'nogo
proizvodstva / Evropeyskiy grazhdanskiy protsess i ispolnitel'noe proizvodstvo: Sbornik materialov
Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, g. Kazan', Kazanskiy (Privolzhskiy) federal'nyy uni-
versitet, 25 marta 2011 g. / otv. red. D.Kh. Valeev. — M.: Statut, 2012.
8. Mnenie № 13 (2010) Konsul'tativnogo soveta evropeyskikh sudey «O roli sudey v ispolnenii sudebnogo
resheniya», razdel IV (po administrativnym delam) // URL: https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?Ref=CCJE%2820
10%292&Language=lanEnglish&Ver=original&BackColorInternet=DBDCF2&BackColorIntranet=FDC864&BackColor
Logged=FDC864.

References (transliteration):
1. Administrativno-protsessual'noe pravo Rossii / I.V. Panova. — 3-e izd., peresmotr. — M.: Norma:
INFRA-M, 2011.
2. Gal'perin M.L. Pravovaya politika i printsipy ispolnitel'nogo proizvodstva // Zakon. — 2011. — № 7.
3. Demichev A.A. Printsipy ispolnitel'nogo prava po Proektu Ispolnitel'nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federa-
tsii // Ispolnitel'noe pravo. — 2005. — № 1.
4. Dzhukha O.V. Printsipy administrativno-yurisdiktsionnogo protsessa: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. —
Rostov-n/D, 2011.
5. Kommentariy k Federal'nomu zakonu «Ob ispolnitel'nom proizvodstve» (s postateynymi materialami)
(postateynyy) (Valeev D.Kh.) // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
6. Kommentariy k Federal'nomu zakonu ot 8 avgusta 2001 g. № 129-FZ «O gosudarstvennoy registratsii yuridi-
cheskikh lits i individual'nykh predprinimateley» (postateynyy) (Kukharenko T.A., Nikolaeva E.A., Kartasho-
va Yu.A., Guseva T.A. ) (pod red. T.A. Gusevoy) // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
7. Lourenso P.M. Novye zakonodatel'nye polozheniya Dekreta-zakona ot 20 noyabrya 2008 g. № 226/2008: usile-
nie roli portugal'skogo agenta po ispolneniyu i sozdanie Komissii po effektivnosti ispolnitel'nogo
proizvodstva / Evropeyskiy grazhdanskiy protsess i ispolnitel'noe proizvodstvo: Sbornik materialov
Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, g. Kazan', Kazanskiy (Privolzhskiy) federal'nyy uni-
versitet, 25 marta 2011 g. / otv. red. D.Kh. Valeev. — M.: Statut, 2012.
8. Mnenie № 13 (2010) Konsul'tativnogo soveta evropeyskikh sudey «O roli sudey v ispolnenii sudebnogo
resheniya», razdel IV (po administrativnym delam) // URL: https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?Ref=CCJE%2820
10%292&Language=lanEnglish&Ver=original&BackColorInternet=DBDCF2&BackColorIntranet=FDC864&BackColor
Logged=FDC864.