Reference:
Lykova O..
The analysis of gender-specific peculiarities of insincerity
// SENTENTIA. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. – 2019. – ¹ 3.
– P. 72-79.
DOI: 10.25136/1339-3057.2019.3.28785.
DOI: 10.25136/1339-3057.2019.3.28785
Read the article
Abstract: The subject of the study is gender characteristics of insincere statements and behavior. The experimental material includes 100 video fragments in Russian and 100 video fragments in American English. The study of this material included perceptual-auditory and perceptual-visual types of analysis, which were conducted with the involvement of groups of test-auditors. The results of perceptual-auditory and perceptual-visual types of analysis revealed some gender differences in insincere statements and behavior. However, most of the parameter values noted by the subjects when working with the material are in the zone of average values, which makes the study of these parameters especially difficult and indicates the relevance of this problem. Processing such a data set (915,600 cells) was carried out for the first time, but it did not reveal major gender differences in the speech and behavior of communicants, which indicates the need for further study of this problem.
Keywords: perceptual-visual analysis, perceptual-auditory analysis, insincerity, lie detection, deception detection, deception, lies, paralinguistics, speech analysis, voice analysis
References:
Feldman R. S.,. Forrest J. A, Happ B. R. Self-Presentation and Verbal Deception: Do Self-Presenters Lie More?// University of Massachusetts, Amherst. – BASIC AND APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 24(2). 2002.– Pp.163–170.
DePaulo, B. M., Kashy, D. A., Kirkendol, S. E., Wyer, M. M., Epstein, J. A. Lying in everyday life.// Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. – V.70, 1996. – Pp. 979–995.
DePaulo B., Lindsay J., Malone B., Muhlenbruck L., Charlton K., Cooper H. Cues to deception. //Psychological Bulletin, 2003. – V. 129 (1). – Pp. 74–118.
Campanella S, Rossignol M, Mejias S, Joassin F, Maurage P, Debatisse D, Bruyer R, Crommelinck M, Guérit JM Neurosci Lett. Human gender differences in an emotional visual oddball task: an event-related potentials study.// Neurosci Lett., 2004. –Pp. 367.
Hall J.A. Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cues.// Psychol. Bull,1978. –V.85 Pp. 845–857.
Hoffmann H., Kessler H., Eppel T., Rukavina S., Traue H.C. Expression intensity, gender and facial emotion reco