Gashkov S.A. —
Subject and history: Castoriadis’ reasoning on modernity in the context of his philosophical polemics (Heidegger, Ricoeur, Habermas)
// SENTENTIA. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences.
– 2020. – ¹ 2.
– P. 1 - 8.
DOI: 10.25136/1339-3057.2020.2.32392 URL: https://en. nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=32392
Read the article
The subject of this research is the historical-philosophical and polemical context of the reasoning on history of the French philosopher of Greek descent Cornelius Castoriadis (1922-1997). The philosopher structures a complex polemical model that sharply responses to all attempts to determine society, being, history, and human. Even the recognized philosophical figures of the XX century, such as M. Heidegger, P. Ricoeur, J. Haberma, who have no biased attitude on philosophical knowledge, appear to be subject to critical analysis. The author applied intertextual, hermeneutic and dialogical methods leaning on the texts of the aforementioned authors, as well as the data of modern critical literature. The scientific novelty consists in attraction of the relatively unknown to the Russian audience historical-philosophical material, and an attempt to reproduce the polemics and debates that were held in French intellectual environment of the late XX century. At the same time, the author did not follow the goals of historical and biobibliographical description, but rather return to the origins of the philosophy and history and revival of philosophical reasoning on history based on the researched material, demonstration of complicated, aporetic, heterogeneous and heuristic nature of the relation between philosophy, social disciplines and humanities. The author concludes that we cannot speak of the poststructuralist philosophy of history; the work of Castoriadis mostly represents philosophical criticism of theoretical grounds of social disciplines and humanities, although in the context of philosophical thought, it acquires an independent scientific meaning. The author ubderlines that Castoriadis polemicized Heidegger's thought, especially in regard of Ancient Greek civilization; the limits of Castoriadis' thought, such as radical atheism, social monadism, refusal to think communication; the advantages of Castoriadis' thought of history, his multiculturalism, his claim to restore genuine philosophy and democracy, criticism of determinism, scientism, cultural egoism.
history of philosophy, polemics, history, subject, Habermas, Ricoeur, Heidegger, Castoriadis, philosophy of history, creation
Gashkov S.A. Problema interpretatsii drevnegrecheskoy tsivilizatsii. Kastoriadis i Mamardashvili: mezhdu germenevtikoy i strukturalizmom // Filosofskaya mysl'. — 0.-¹ 0.-S.0-0. DOI: 10.25136/2409-87220.127.116.1197. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_24197.htm
Ricoeur P. Memory, History, Forgetting. University of Chicago Press, 2004. 624 pp.
Ricoeur P. History and Truth, Northwestern University Press, 1965, 368 p.
Heidegger, M. Hegel and Greeks//Pathmarks, Cambridge Press, pp. 323-336
Michel J., Davidson S., Ricoeur and Poststructuralists: Bourdieu, Derrida, Deleuze, Foucault, Castoriadis. Rowman Publishers, 2014, 234 pp.
Habermas J. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, MIT-Press, 2001, 244 pp.
Habermas J. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, Twelve Lectures, trad. by Lawrence, MIT Press, 1987, 430 pp.
Gashkov S.A. — Cornelius Castoriadis reforms the philosophy of history // Filosofskaya mysl'. – 2019. – ¹ 1. – S. 50-58. DOI: 10.25136/2409-8728.2019.1.27541 URL: https://nbpublish.com/