Reference:
Leontyev G.D., Leontieva L.S..
Digital Techno-Democracy as a Post-non-Classical Praktopia
// Sociodynamics. – 2023. – ¹ 4.
– P. 1-10.
DOI: 10.25136/2409-7144.2023.4.40407.
DOI: 10.25136/2409-7144.2023.4.40407
Read the article
Abstract: The analysis of digital, socio-technological projects of the future is carried out in the context of post-non-classical utopian discourse based on a systematic approach, concepts of information society, dynamic information theory, K. Popper's ideas about social engineering. In order to identify the social effects of modern IT innovations, the current situation with universal ChatGPT is considered. It is argued that technology does not have an autonomous moral status, it is a projection of a person on the world. Their ethical burden, as well as the functionality and framework of self-organization are set from the outside. Artificial intelligence is a technology for simulating the reproduction of human reality, including patterns of social deviations. It means that not so much the virtual world as the actual reality needs humanizing correction. Information – technological, communicative mechanisms of overcoming social imperfections can be traced in the conceptually successive projects of "holotechnodemocracy" by M. Bunge, "information democracy" by M. Rocard, in projects of digital, cloud, electronic democracy. It is revealed that the modeling of an ideal digital future is based on a procedural approach, characterized by the authors of the article in the terminology of K. Popper as a "piecemeal" method, that is, "social engineering of private solutions". Therefore, digital techno-democracies are defined as a kind of modern praktopia, which evolutionarily and permanently forms an alternative social reality based on information and communication technologies and socio–network self–organization of a person and neural networks.
Keywords: information, praktopia, techno utopia, digital democracy, artificial intelligence, technology, virtual reality, self-organization, ethics, social engineering
References:
Leontyev, G. D., Leontieva, L. S. (2020). Praxeology of social utopia: protest-project-practice. Sociodynamics, No. 2, Ð. 64-73. DOI: 10.25136/2409-7144.2020.2.30089 Retrieved from https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=30089
Schwab, Klaus. (2017). The Fourth Industrial Revolution / K. Schwab.-Random House (USA), 192 p.
Safina, A. M., Leontyev, G. D., Gaynullina, L. F., Leontieva, L. S., Khalilova, T. V. (2018). Dialectics of freedom and alienation in the space of the internet. Revista ESPACIOS, Vol. 39 (Nº27), Ð. 8. Retrieved from http://www.revistaespacios.com/a18v39n27/18392708.html
Khalutornykh, O. N., Egorova, E. A. (2022). Digital utopia in modern society: socio-philosophical aspect. Humanitarian Bulletin of the Moscow State Technical University. N.E. Bauman. No. 2 (94). DOI: 10.18698/2306-8477-2022-2-771
Kuzemina, E. F., Pashkova, N. V. (2022). Utopia as a form of existential isolation. Society: philosophy, history, culture. No. 8, Ð. 45-49. Retrieved from https://doi.