Abstract: The object of this research is the normative legal documents that regulate the process of conducting various types of land surveying expertise. The subject of this research is the conceptual apparatus of land surveying expertise, formed by the indicated documentation. In the course of this study, the authors examined the organizational and legal framework of forensic land surveying expertise and state expertise of land surveying documentation; procedural experience in conducting these types of land surveying expertise; case law on resolution of land and property disputes; works of national and foreign scholars on the matter. The authors attempted to formulate recommendation on the arrangement of conceptual apparatus of land surveying expertise. The relevance of this research is substantiated by insufficient scientific-methodological basis and conceptual apparatus of forensic land surveying expertise. The scientific novelty lies in juxtaposition of the practice, conceptual apparatus, legal, and scientific-methodological framework of forensic land surveying expertise and state expertise of land surveying documentation. The conclusion is made that on partial nonconformity of the concept of forensic land surveying expertise to the type of works conducted thereof. It is proposed to amend judicial legislation with regards to allocation of the new type of forensic expertise, as well as cadastral legislation with regards to broadening the types of cadastral activity.

Keywords: land dispute, cadastral works, land use planning, land use planning expertise, real estate object, land use planning object, land plot, judicial expert, expert opinion, land use planning documentation

References:
Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 04.04.2002 № 214 «Ob utverzhdenii polozheniya o gosudarstvennoy ekspertize zemleustroitel'noy dokumentatsii» [Elektronnyy resurs] // SPS «Konsul'tant plyus». URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_36170/ (data obrashcheniya 17.06.2020).
Federal'nyy zakon ot 18.06.2001 g. № 78-FZ «O zemleustroystve» [Elektronnyy resurs] // SPS «Konsul'tant plyus». URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_32132/ (data obrashcheniya 17.06.2020).
Prikaz Minyusta RF ot 27.12.2012 № 237 «Ob utverzhdenii Perechnya rodov (vidov) sudebnykh ekspertiz, vypolnyaemykh v federal'nykh byudzhetnykh sudebno-ekspertnykh uchrezhdeniyakh minyusta Rossii, i perechnya ekspertnykh spetsial'nostey, po kotorym predstavlyaetsya pravo samostoyatel'nogo proizvodstva sudebnykh ekspertiz v federal'nykh byudzhetnykh sudebno-ekspertnykh uchrezhdeniyakh Minyusta Rossii» [Elektronnyy resurs] // SPS «Konsul'tant plyus». URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_141682/ (data obrashcheniya 16.06.2020).
Goryunova O.I. Podg

Abstract: The object of this research is the parties of relations of bank guarantee within the contractual system. The subject of this research is the legal position of the parties of the relations pertaining to provision bank guarantee in the sphere of procurement. In the process of examining the status of the parties of relations in bank guarantee within the contractual system, the author examines the normative legal acts that establish requirements and boundaries for parties of the relations pertaining to guarantee commitment in the sphere of procurement. Throughout the process of studying the status of subjects of guarantee commitments in the sphere of procurement, special attention is given to the requirements imposed on the guarantor, beneficiary, and principal in the contractual system. The main conclusions consist in the requirements established by the Law on Contractual System and other normative legal acts restricting the list of persons authorized to act as a guarantor, beneficiary, and principal of bank guarantee in the sphere of procurement. It is determined that such requirements are characteristic to the guarantee commitment in the sphere of procurement.

Keywords: state customer, legal entities, guarantee obligation, principal, beneficiary customer, guarantor bank, bank guarantee, municipal customer., contract system, procurement sphere

References:
Shumilov A.A. Kogo mozhno schitat' uchastnikom razmeshcheniya zakaza? // Korporativnyy yurist. 2007. № 6. S. 23-33.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 21.07.2005 № 94-FZ «O razmeshchenii zakazov na postavki tovarov, vypolnenie rabot, okazanie uslug dlya gosudarstvennykh i munitsipal'nykh nuzhd» // SZ RF. 2005. № 30. St. 3105.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 05.04.2013 № 44-FZ «O kontraktnoy sisteme v sfere zakupok tovarov, rabot, uslug dlya obespecheniya gosudarstvennykh i munitsipal'nykh nuzhd» // SZ RF. 2014. № 14. St. 1652.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 10.07.2002 № 86-FZ «O Tsentral'nom banke Rossiyskoy Federatsii (Banke Rossii)» // SZ RF. 2002, № 28. St. 2790.
Rezgo P.G. Problemy grazhdansko-pravovogo regulirovaniya otnosheniy po bankovskoy garantii v RF: Dis.... kand. yurid. nauk. Moskva, 2003.170 s.
Tarakanov S.A. Obespechitel'naya tsennost' poruchitel'stva i bankovskoy garantii v sisteme pravovykh sposobov, garantiruyushchikh ispolnenie kreditnogo dogovora: Dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Sankt-Peterburg, 1999. 189 s.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 02.12.1990 № 395-1 «O