Reference:
Kachay I.S..
Ontological, epistemological and anthropological dimensions of creativity in the context of classical European philosophy
// Man and Culture. – 2023. – ¹ 6.
– P. 137-152.
DOI: 10.25136/2409-8744.2023.6.69277.
DOI: 10.25136/2409-8744.2023.6.69277
Read the article
Abstract: The object of this research is creativity as a cultural and philosophical phenomenon. The subject of the research is the ontological, epistemological and anthropological aspects of creativity, revealed in the conceptual space of classical European philosophy. The aim of this research is to identify ways to understand creativity as a cultural and philosophical phenomenon through the prism of the views of the largest representatives of European philosophical thought. When considering the essential foundations of creativity, special attention is paid to the ontological, epistemological and anthropological nature of creativity, which is emphasized in the conceptual constructions of Plato, Aristotle, Augustine Blessed, Thomas Aquinas, F. Bacon, R. Descartes, J. Locke, I. Kant and F.W.J. Schelling. The theoretical basis of this research is the original works of representatives of classical European philosophy, as well as modern research in the field of philosophy of creativity. The methodological foundation of the research is the comparative analysis and the method of contextual vision of creativity. The main result of the conducted research is the articulation of the understanding of the phenomenon of creativity in the context of the classical period of the development of European philosophical thought from the standpoint of ontological, gnoseological and anthropological approaches. Based on the identified aspects of the desired cultural phenomenon, a historically determined concept of creativity is presented. The scientific novelty of the research also lies in the discovery and accentuation of both explicit and implicit aspirations of the classics of European philosophy to the essential understanding of the genuine and false intentions of the creative subject.
Keywords: false creativity, ontology, epistemology, anthropology, ancient philosophy, medieval philosophy, Philosophy of the New Time, German classical philosophy, genuine creativity, creative intentions
References:
Blok, V. (2022). The Ontology of Creation: Towards a Philosophical Account of the Creation of World in Innovation Processes. Foundations of Science, 1–18. doi:10.1007/s10699-022-09848-y
Fiut, I.S. (2002). The Ontology of the Creative Process. In: A. – T. Tymieniecka (Ed.), The Creative Matrix of the Origins (pp. 327–339). Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0538-8_25
Neves-Pereira, M.S., & Pinheiro, M.A. (2023). Creativity and Dialogism. In: M.S. Neves-Pereira, M.A. Pinheiro (Eds.), A Dialogical Approach to Creativity (pp. 11–32). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-11760-2_2
Zheng, L., & Mazzola, G. (2023). Ontology, Oniontology, and Creativity. In: Classification of Musical Objects for Analysis and Composition. Computational Music Science (pp. 7–12). Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-30183-4_2
Peschl, M., & Fundneider, T. (2008). Emergent Innovation – a Socio-Epistemological Innovation Technology. Creating Profound Chang