Abstract: This article discusses the ways to improve the decorative qualities of wood that are known to mankind since the ancient times, as well as the techniques of working with wood that have improved over time. The author underlines the importance of the proper choice of finishing materials, which is intended for not only preserving the cultural sites, but also making a certain aesthetic perception. The choice of materials is substantiated by the nature of wood, as well as the, the conceptual idea of the artist. The article explores the key methods of finishing woodworking in the process of creating the original wooden sculptures. The author lists the main types of wood finishing, as well as some of the original techniques. It is noted that there are various technologies of wood dye. A description is given to the treatment of wooden surface with wax in its traditional and modern form; as well as to some original techniques such as the woodworking affected by bark beetle and glazing. It is stated that the proper glazing gives wood strength and resistance, protecting from various influences and significantly extending its durability. Particular attention is turned to the method of gilding and implementation of this ancient technique in modern wooden sculpture. Recommendations are given for the proper selection of applicators to maintain wood dye.

Keywords: pigment, gilding, wax, art, a wooden sculptur, wood, painting, finishing, workin, an artis

References:
¹ 2. – S. 152-153. 9. Rykunin S.N., Kandalina L.N. Tekhnologiya derevoobrabotki: ucheb. dlya nach. prof. obrazovaniya / 5-e izd. – M.: Akademiya, 2011. – 352 s.
Yakovenko A.I. Stvolovye vrediteli na vetroval'nykh sosnyakakh Moskovskoy oblasti // Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta lesa. Lesnoy vestnik. 2011. ¹ 4. – S. 46-53.
Potalitsyn D.V., Zakharenko E.A. Tekhnologiya obrabotki dereva ognem kak metod zashchity ot deystviya agressivno-razrushayushchikh faktorov // Vestnik Studencheskogo nauchnogo obshchestva. 2018. T.
Pilikina N.N. Iskusstvo khudozhestvennoy obrabotki dereva v dialoge istorii i sovremennosti // Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul'tury i iskusstv. 2009. ¹ 1(27). – S. 236-241.
Manke Dzh., Beyd P., Kostello S. 1000 shedevrov. Skul'ptura. – SPb.: Azbuka, 2014. – 544 s.
Orlov I.I., Mashakin A.I. Tekhnologiya khudozhestvennoy obrabotki materialov (rez'ba po derevu): Uchebnoe posobie dlya provedeniya prakticheskikh zanyatiy. – M.: MGKhPA im. S.G. Stroganova, 2018. – 92 s.
Dzhekson A., Dey D. E

Abstract: The article signifies the historical prerequisites for the development of Krasnoyarsk school of sculptural art, as well as determines its main features. Based on the creative and pedagogical activity of Alexander Evgenyevich Tkachuk, as one of the leading pedagogues of the school, the article identifies his methodological orientations and creative approaches. The goal of this research lies in familiarization with the brief historical prerequisites for the establishment of Krasnoyarsk school of sculptural art; examination of the key methodological orientations and principles of teaching sculpture in Krasnoyarsk on the example of creative and pedagogical activity of Professor A. E. Tkachuk. The fact that Krasnoyarsk school as an independent phenomenon was not sufficiently studied substantiates the scientific novelty of this article. Krasnoyarsk school of sculptural art is characterized by the following attributes: gravitation towards integrity of composition and generalized interpretation of shape; expressivity of the silhouette, use of rhythm and graphic techniques, preservation of expressive modelling, step-by-step methodical work. This is a living phenomenon, continuous to evolve in the pedagogical sphere, and is passed on from the teacher to the student.

Keywords: Sculpture in Krasnoyarsk, Sculpture in the city, Urban sculpture, pedagogical principles of Tkachuk, Tkachuk, methodical settings, Krasnoyarsk school of sculpture, sculpture, Lavrov, Krasnoyarsk plastic

References:
Shavlygin D. O. Problematika razvitiya monumental'noy skul'ptury v arkhitekturnom prostranstve goroda Krasnoyarska // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2015. ¹ 9-1 (59). S. 205-210.
N. A. Bakhova, N. M. Sergienkova. The Siberian Specificity of the Sculpture of Krasnoyarsk (in the Context of the All-Russian Values) // Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences 12 (2011 4) 1767-1783}
Slabukha A. V. Proektnyy metod, sorazmernosti i smyslovye "allyuzii" v arkhitekture. Iz tvorcheskogo opyta pokoleniya sovetskikh arkhitektorov Sibiri vtoroy poloviny KhKh veka: Eduard Panov // Arkhitektura i dizayn. 2017. ¹ 1. S. 1-19.
Trigaleva N. V. Skul'ptura Krasnoyarska. Kratkiy ocherk istorii razvitiya // Surikovskie chteniya. Krasnoyarsk, 2008. S. 139-146.
Moskalyuk M. V. Skul'ptor Yuriy Ishkhanov. Krasnoyarsk, 2009. 143 s.
Lomanova T. M. Iskusstvo Krasnoyarska. KhKh vek. Zhivopis'. Grafika. Skul'ptura. Dekorativno-prikladnoe