Abstract: The subject of the study is the issues of codification of administrative procedural and administrative tort legislation. The complex issue of its codification requires a thorough analysis of a number of fundamental theses for further argumentation of the author's position regarding the improvement of the institutional foundations of codification both from the standpoint of scientific and methodological development and practical implementation. The need to codify administrative proceedings is due to the fact that the reform of the administrative procedure will be incomplete without improving the CAS of the Russian Federation in terms of including the provisions of the APC of the Russian Federation and the procedure for considering cases of administrative offenses and strengthening judicial control over the actions of administrative jurisdiction bodies by reforming the procedural mechanism for considering cases of administrative offenses by courts of general jurisdiction (option arbitration courts according to the rules of the RF PACS). The goals are achieved using the methods of historical, systematization, synthesis, and special legal methods. The scientific idea of the formation of the procedural form of administration is argued, the scientific idea of the formation of the procedural form of administrative legislation is documented, which means only the judicial procedure for the consideration of cases, including administrative proceedings and proceedings in cases of administrative offenses. Practical recommendations are formulated on reforming the legislative and organizational foundations in the field under study and the adoption of a basic law on the procedure for the implementation of administrative proceedings when considering and resolving administrative cases by courts on the protection of violated or disputed rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of citizens and organizations, as well as other administrative cases related to the exercise of judicial control over the legality and validity of public powers, namely, the Administrative Procedural Code of the Russian Federation (as a variant of the Procedural Administrative Code of the Russian Federation - PAK RF). An invitation to the discussion is published.

Keywords: improvement of legislation, administrative process, administrative procedural code, reformation, administrative proceedings, codification, administrative tort legislation, administrative procedural legislation, administrative law, administrative offenses

References:
Studenikina, M. S. (2001). Procedural forms of administration of justice in administrative cases. Judicial reform in Russia: problems of improving procedural legislation: based on the materials of the scientific and practical conference (Moscow, May 28, 2001). Moscow.
Maslennikov, M. Ya. (2012). Russian Administrative Procedure Code-real and self-sufficient. Administrative law and process, 2, 22-29.
Serkov, P. P. (2013). On the question of the modern understanding of administrative proceedings. Administrative law and process, 9, 9-21.
Volkov, A. M., & Milov, P. O. Institutional foundations of the activities of executive authorities as subjects of public administration. Modern science: actual problems of theory and practice: The series "Economics and Law", 1-2020 (January) (pp. 113-118).
Zelentsov, A. B. (2018). Differentiation and unification of administrative proceedings: conceptual problems. Administrative law and process, 3, 23-35.

Abstract: The object of the study is the general purpose and function, as well as the tasks of the proceedings in cases of administrative offenses. The interdependence and relativity of the concepts of "purpose" and "task" of proceedings in cases of administrative offenses cause difficulties in establishing their distinctive features and mutual differentiation, and therefore the issue of defining these categories in the science of administrative law is currently debatable. For this reason, the works of prominent Russian jurists such as D. N. Bakhrah, V. V. Dorokhin, S. D. Mogilevsky, A. Y. Yakimovich, revealing the content and essence of these concepts from different sides, formed the subject of this study. The specificity of the research object was a decisive factor in determining the research methodology. In preparing the article, a set of general scientific and private scientific methods was used, including the method of system analysis, which ensured the validity of the author's judgments, suggestions and recommendations. Within the framework of a systematic analysis, directing the research process from a complex to a simpler manifestation of the object of research, the author, based on the patterns of formation of tree-like hierarchical structures, reveals the content of the above concepts in an original way, defines the general law-restoring nature of production, identifies the law enforcement stages in it, as well as the goals and special tasks of each stage.
As a result of the research, the author's version of Article 24.1 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation is proposed, which establishes a legal definition of the purpose of proceedings in cases of administrative offenses.
Proposals for improving the current legislation indicate the applied significance of this study, while some conclusions and theoretical generalizations of the author can be used to conduct further research in this direction.

Keywords: function, goal, purpose, administrative proceedings, tree structures, system analysis, offense, administrative process, tasks, stages of proceedings

References:
Iziumova, E. С. (2019). Proceedings on cases of administrative offenses in the system of administrative law. NB: Administrative law and practice of administration, 6, 22–29.
Prokhorova, I. A. (2013). Theory of systems and system analysis: textbook. Chelyabinsk: SUSU Publishing Center.
Ozhegov, S. I. (Ed.). (2020). Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian Language: Ok. 100 000 words, terms and phraseological expressions. Moscow: AST Publishing House: Mir More and Education.
Glazunov, Y. T. (2013). Targeting and motivation. Bulletin of Murmansk State Technical University, 2(16), 288–299.
Ivanov, V. I. (2020). The purpose of the criminal process: a psychological and legal analysis. Siberian criminal–procedural and criminalistic readings, 3(29), 20–26.
Shergin, A. P. (2003). On the concept of administrative policy. In V. Kikot (ed), Actual problems of administrative and administrative–procedural law: Materials of the inter