ARTICLES of rubric«Liability in administrative and municipal law»

Sidorov E.T. — Problems of Qualification of an Administrative Offense Provided by part 1 of Article 20.20. of the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses (š3, 2023)
Gluzdak G.N., Likhomanova Y.Y., Bulgakova L.S. — Perspectives and Ways of Developing Alternative Methods for Calculating Administrative Fines (š4, 2022)
Bylinin I.A. — To the question of administrative legal regulation of carsharing and implementation of the federal state monitoring in the area of ensuring road traffic safety to the parties involved (š3, 2020)
Gunba A.A. — Regarding Extension of Terms of Bringing to Administrative Responsibility for Violation of the Contract System Law (š1, 2019)
Moshkina N.A., Ovsyannikov S.A. — The Problems of Implementation of Administrative Law on Punishment for the Violation of Public Order (š6, 2018)
Fofanov A.N. — State Defence Order as an Object of Administrative Protection (š5, 2018)
Bobrova A.V. — On the Single Nature of Resonsibility of Customs Authorities and Participants of Foreign Economic Activity (š2, 2018)
Sevostyanova E.V. — Relief from Administrative Responsibility for Failure to Declare or False Declaration of Goods: Implementation Issues in Eurasian Economic Union Business Environment (š5, 2017)
Sidorov E.T., Tarasov A.Y. — Some Issues of the Legal Institution of Relief from Administrative Responsibility (š5, 2017)
Mamatov M.V., Maslov I.A. — Administrative responsibility for the violation of the procedure of consideration of citizens appeals (š4, 2017)
Neganova E.N. — Directions of law-making in the sphere of administrative liability for the breach of the social constitutional right to housing (š3, 2017)
Lipinsky D.A., Musatkina A.A. — Goals and functions of administrative punishments (š2, 2017)
Karavaev A.O., Zabaykalov A. — On particular aspects of an Internet Service Providers responsibility for copyright infringement on the Internet (š5, 2016)
Bombitskii A.M. — Administrative responsibility and its implementation in cases of breaches of the legislation on contract system in procurement of goods, works, and services for state and municipal needs (š4, 2015)
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V., Myshlyaev N.P. — Causes and conditions of administrative offences (š3, 2015)
Lipinsky D.A. — Functions of administrative responsibility (š3, 2015)
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V., Myshlyaev N.P. — Classification of administrative and preventive measures (š2, 2015)
Motin V.V., Trofimov O.E. — Problems of security guarantees in water transportation. (š12, 2013)
Kurakin A.V., Badulin A.D., Tregubova E.V. — Administrative Responsibility for Violations on the Alcohol Market and the Role of Police in Legal Enforcement of Administrative Responsibility (š10, 2013)
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. — Concerning the Grounds of Administrative Responsibility in the Russian Legislation (š10, 2013)
Kabanov P.A. — The qualification requirements to the members of the Commissions on compliance with the requirements to service behavior of state (municipal) servants and conflict of interests regulation for those not holding state (municipal) service positions. (š3, 2013)
Moskvina Y.V. — Material Damage Resulting From a Traffic Accident as a Circumstance Aggravating Administrative Responsibility (š2, 2013)

Contents details

Reference:

Sidorov E.T.. Problems of Qualification of an Administrative Offense Provided by part 1 of Article 20.20. of the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses // NB: Administrative Law and Administration Practice. – 2023. – š 3. – P. 23-32.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The object of the study is the public relations arising between a police officer and a person brought to administrative responsibility for committing an administrative offense provided for in part 1 of Article 20.20 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation. The subject of the study was the legal norms contained in Part 1 of Article 20.20 of the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation. The proposed article analyzes the composition of an administrative offense provided for in part 1 of Article 20.20. of the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses and law enforcement practice in cases of this category.
The purpose of the work was to formulate, based on the analysis of theoretical provisions and law enforcement practice, proposals and recommendations for improving police activities in the qualification of an administrative offense provided for in part 1 of Article 20.20 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation.

Keywords: the composition of an administrative offense, drinking, alcoholic beverages, interpretation of the legal norm, legal norm, administrative responsibility, administrative offense, proofs, qualification of an administrative offense, consumption

References:
The Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses of 30.12.2001 No. 195-FZ. The Assembly of Legislation of the Russian Federation, 07.01.2002, No. 1 (Part 1), art. 1.
Federal Law of 22.11.1995 No. 171-FZ (ed. of 28.12.2022) "On state regulation of the production and turnover of ethyl alcohol, alcoholic and alcohol-containing products and on limiting the consumption (drinking) of alcoholic beverages". Collection of Legislation of the Russian Federation, 27.11.1995, No. 48, Article 4553.
Federal Law No. 7-FZ of February 3, 2015 "On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation" // Collection of Legislation of the Russian Federation of February 9 2015, No. 6, article 885.
Federal Law No. 156-FZ dated 05.12.2005 "On Amendments to the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation" // Collection of Legislation of the Russian Federation, 12.12.2005, No. 50, Article 5247.
Definition of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation dated 16.10.2003 No. 32

Reference:

Gluzdak G.N., Likhomanova Y.Y., Bulgakova L.S.. Perspectives and Ways of Developing Alternative Methods for Calculating Administrative Fines // NB: Administrative Law and Administration Practice. – 2022. – š 4. – P. 62-71.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The research focuses on methods of calculating administrative fines, which could be considered as an alternative to the existing ones. The aim of the work is to propose such methods, as well as to identify prospects and ways of their development. The study examines the problem of the appropriateness of calculating administrative fines in hard money, which is particularly relevant in the context of insufficient effectiveness of this type of administrative punishment. The authors analyze changes in the domestic legislation on administrative offences, and also refer to the comparative legal method, comparing the methods of calculating fines in the Russian Federation and in other states: Belarus, Kazakhstan, Finland. The authors conclude that significant money fines are not sufficiently effective. The novelty of the study lies in the proposal of alternative methods for calculating the administrative fine: the determination of the amount of the monetary penalty in relation to the minimum wage, the base value or the calculation indicator, the income of the offender. Special attention is paid to the consideration of alternative ways of calculating administrative fines for traffic offences: The establishment of a relationship between administrative penalties and the cost of the vehicle or the capacity of its engine and the introduction of a penalty point system are proposed. The results of the study can be used to improve the legislation of the Russian Federation on administrative offences.

Keywords: penalty points, traffic, basic value, minimum wage, amount of the fine, monetary penalty, administrative liability, administrative punishment, administrative fine, repeated offense

References:
Shubina, V. The history of the emergence and development of the institute of administrative penalty in Russia / V. S. Shubina // Tribune of the scientist. 2020, 10, 312-318.
Rossinsky, B. Administrative law / B. V. Rossinsky, Yu. N. Starilov Moscow : Norm : INFRA-M, 2020.
Lipinsky, D. Goals and functions of administrative punishments / D. A. Lipinsky, A. A. Musatkina // NB: Administrative law and practice of administration, 2017, 2, 20-37.
Bulakhova, T. Introduction to the problem of administration of fines as an element of non-tax revenues of the budget / T. P. Bulakhova, A. A. Zemtsov // Problems of accounting and Finance, 2012, š 2(6), 59-64
Panova, I. Actual problems of administrative responsibility / I. V. Panova, A. B. Panov // Asia-Pacific region: economics, politics, law. 2019, Vol. 21, 3, 105-134.
Maksimov I. The system of administrative penalties: the concept and signs // State and law. 2005, 4, 1827.
Avdeenkova, M. Legal possibilities of effective application of measures

Reference:

Bylinin I.A.. To the question of administrative legal regulation of carsharing and implementation of the federal state monitoring in the area of ensuring road traffic safety to the parties involved // NB: Administrative Law and Administration Practice. – 2020. – š 3. – P. 17-27.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The subject of this research is the normative legal acts that regulating responsibility for failure to comply with statutory requirements on ensuring road traffic safety in the context of short-term car rentals, law enforcement practice, statistical analysis of traffic accidents involving the vehicles provided by carsharing companies, as well as terms for their provision. The object of this research is the social relations emerging in the context of short-term car rentals owned by legal entities and individual entrepreneurs. The goal of this work consist in the attempt to improve the administrative legislation on bringing to responsibility legal entities and individual entrepreneurs who provide short-term rental services to citizens. The scientific novelty lies in legal regulation of the definition of “carsharing” on the level of federal legislation, as well as in amendments to the terms of the contract that would eliminate inconsistency of case law with regards to civil law relations and bringing to administrative responsibility of the persons who fail to comply with statutory requirements on ensuring road traffic safety. The proposed by the author concept of “carsharing” would allow imposition of obligations upon the leaseholders on compliance with road traffic safety requirements placed on the legal entities and individual entrepreneurs while operating a vehicle in accordance with the Federal Law No. 196-FZ of 12.10.1995 "On Road Traffic Safety".

Keywords: Legal entity, Damage, Risks, Hire, Administrative responsibility, Carsharing, Short-term vehicle rental, Traffic accident, road safety, Individual entrepreneur

References:
Bubnovskaya T.A., Suvorov Yu.B. K voprosu o karsheringe: pravovye aspekty / izd. ŤYuristť. 2018. š 7. S. 32-36.
Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva Moskvy ot 31 avgusta 2011 g. š 405-PP ŤO gorodskoy podderzhke taksomotornykh perevozok i uslugi karshering v gorode Moskveť (red. ot 08.08.2017).
Federal'nyy zakon ot 10.12.1995 š 196-FZ (red. ot 30.07.2019) ŤO bezopasnosti dorozhnogo dvizheniyať stat'ya 20.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 01.07.2011 š 170-FZ ŤO tekhnicheskom osmotre transportnykh sredstv i o vnesenii izmeneniy v otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsiiť, stat'ya 15.
Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii (chast' vtoraya) ot 26 yanvarya 1996 g. š 14-FZ.
Ayusheeva I.Z. Grazhdansko-pravovoe regulirovanie otnosheniy po sovmestnomu ispol'zovaniyu transportnykh sredstv na primere karsheringa / Vestnik Universiteta imeni O.E. Kutafina (MGYuA). 2019.š2. S.25-32.
Pokazateli bezopasnosti dorozhnogo dvizheniya [Elektronnyy resurs] // Rezhim dostupa: http://stat.gibdd.ru/ (data obrashcheniya: 10.09.2020).
https://www.auto

Reference:

Gunba A.A.. Regarding Extension of Terms of Bringing to Administrative Responsibility for Violation of the Contract System Law // NB: Administrative Law and Administration Practice. – 2019. – š 1. – P. 33-40.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The aim of this research is to analyze existing laws and regulations applicable as the means of regulation of the contract system as well as experience in bringing customers to administrative responsibility for violations in the sphere of state and municipal procurement as well as development of recommendations on how to implement the aforesaid mechanism and to improve it. The object of the research is not only administrative responsiblity for committed violations in the sphere of procurement but the entire contract system as an organic whole where administrative responsibility is just one of the sides. To avoid incorrect interpretation of the law and administrative sanctions the research implies the use of such instruments as deduction, i.e. from theoretical provisions and practice in the sphere of procurement in general to particular terms of administrative responsibility. As a result of the research, the author discovers that the current legal basis that regulates the process of bringing to responsibility for violations in the sphere of state and municipal procurement is far from being perfect and quite often does not take into account the causes of such violations.

Keywords: customer, Corruption, the Russian Federation Code of Administrative Offences, a responsibility, the Law, contract system, control bodies, administrative offense, administrative responsibility, executor

References:
Federal'nyy zakon "O kontraktnoy sisteme v sfere zakupok tovarov, rabot, uslug dlya obespecheniya gosudarstvennykh i munitsipal'nykh nuzhd" ot 05.04.2013 N 44-FZ Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_144624/ (data obrashcheniya: 01.06.2018).
"Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh" ot 30.12.2001 N 195-FZ Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_34661/(data obrashcheniya: 01.06.2018).
Pis'mo Kaznacheystva Rossii ot 02.07.2012 N 42-7.4-05/6.3-354 "O napravlenii obzornogo pis'ma Federal'nogo kaznacheystva po problemnym voprosam, voznikayushchim v deyatel'nosti territorial'nykh organov Federal'nogo kaznacheystva pri razmeshchenii zakazov na postavki tovarov, vypolnenie rabot, okazanie uslug" Rezhim dostupa: URL: https://zakonbase.ru/content/base/272135 (data obrashcheniya: 01.06.2018).
O nekotorykh problemakh realizatsii administrativnoy otvetstvennosti za narusheniya zakonodatel'stva o kontraktnoy sisteme v sfere zakupok Rezhim dostupa: URL: https://cyber

Reference:

Moshkina N.A., Ovsyannikov S.A.. The Problems of Implementation of Administrative Law on Punishment for the Violation of Public Order // NB: Administrative Law and Administration Practice. – 2018. – š 6. – P. 16-22.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The subject of the research is the provisions of the administrative law that regulates responsibility for public order offences. The authors of the article focus on the analysis of the regional legislation in this sphere as well as the problems that may arise in the process of this law enforcement. The authors note that the regulatory effect of the Russian Federation constituents o this sphere of social relations have been reduced lately, thus they emphasize the need to reform the regional legislation in part where it sets responsibility for public order and social security offences. The methodological basis of the research includes general research methods such as dialectical method, analysis and synthesis. The authors have also applied the comparative law method that helps analyze federal and regional administrative legislation. The novelty of this research is caused by the fact that the authors study problems that may arise in the process of enforcing administrative responsibility for the violation of the public order in the Russian Federation and Russian Federation constituents. As a result of the research, the authors make a conclusion about the need to improve the regional legislation and suggest areas for improving the legal regulation of administrative responsibility for the violation of public order at the regional level.

Keywords: territorial subjects of the Russian Federation, lawmaking, regional legislation, public safety, public order, police, administrative responsibility, administrative punishments, administrative offenses, administrative and legal ban

References:
Rossinskiy B.V. O polnomochiyakh Rossiyskoy Federatsii i sub'ektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii v oblasti ustanovleniya administrativnoy otvetstvennosti // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2015. š 6. S. 26-31.
Kodeks Tyumenskoy oblasti ob administrativnoy otvetstvennosti ot 27.12.2007 g. š 55 // Parlamentskaya gazeta ŤTyumenskie izvestiyať. 2007. š 242.
Zakon Kirovskoy oblasti ot 04.12.2007 g. š 200-ZO ŤOb administrativnoy otvetstvennosti v Kirovskoy oblastiť // Vyatskiy kray. 2007. š 231 (4119).
Starostin B.A. Nekotorye problemy ustanovleniya i realizatsii administrativnoy otvetstvennosti zakonami sub'ektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2013. š 8. S. 27-28
Zakon Altayskogo kraya ot 10.07.2002 g. š 46-ZS ŤOb administrativnoy otvetstvennosti za sovershenie pravonarusheniy na territorii Altayskogo krayať (red. ot 03.05.2017) // Altayskaya pravda. 2002. š 193-196.
Brtsieva Z.G. Kolliziya norm po peredache MVD Rossii chasti polnomochiy po sostavleniyu protokolov ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh s

Reference:

Fofanov A.N.. State Defence Order as an Object of Administrative Protection // NB: Administrative Law and Administration Practice. – 2018. – š 5. – P. 32-37.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The researcher describes the nature of state defence order that is performed for the purposes of national defence and security. Article 14.55 of the Administrative Offenses Code of the Russian Federation establishes the legal and adminitrative protection of state defence order. The researcher describes four kinds of administrative breach of state defence contract terms or terms of the contract that has been concluded for the purpose of performance of state defence order as well as relevant administrative sanctions. The researcher also analyzes legal precedents of applying Article 14.55 of the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation. The methodological basis of the research includes the following methods: general research methods, multiple survey, systems analysis, and formal law method. The main conclusions of the research are the following: 1. In the Russian Federation, the shift from centralised methods of state mangement to decentralised contract-based market methods creates a number of new risks caused by improper performance of state defence order obligations. This circumstance creates the need to impose administrative responsibility for the breach of the state defence order terms or the terms of the contract that has been concluded for the purpose of performance of state defence order. 2. There have been many precedents of bringing to responsibility based on Article 14.55 of the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation. 3. The need in administrative protection of state defence order is explained by the need in national defence and security.

Keywords: Conditions, Law, Officials, State contract, State defense order, Administrative code, Violation of the conditions, Administrative responsibility, SDO, Responsibility

References:
Golovetskiy G. N. Sovershenstvovanie organizatsionno-ekonomicheskogo mekhanizma gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniya proizvodstva voennoy produktsii i razmeshcheniya gosudarstvennogo oboronnogo zakaza // Internet-zhurnal Naukovedenie. 2016. š 2 (8). S. 1-17.
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30.12.2001 N 195-FZ (red. ot 07.03.2017) // SZ RF ot 07.01.2002, N 1 (ch. 1), st. 1.
Reshenie Zasviyazhskogo rayonnogo suda g. Ul'yanovska Ul'yanovskoy oblasti š 12-178/2017 ot 5 aprelya 2017 g. po delu š 12-178/2017 // Arkhiv Zasviyazhskogo rayonnogo suda g. Ul'yanovska Ul'yanovskoy oblasti.
Reshenie Kamenskogo rayonnogo suda Rostovskoy oblasti š 12-49/2017 ot 29 marta 2017 g. po delu š 12-49/2017 // Arkhiv Kamenskogo rayonnogo suda Rostovskoy oblasti // Arkhiv Kamenskogo rayonnogo suda Rostovskoy oblasti.
Reshenie Kurganskogo oblastnogo suda Kurganskoy oblasti š 72-121/2017 ot 23 marta 2017 g. po delu š 72-121/2017 // Arkhiv Kurganskogo oblastnogo suda Kurganskoy oblasti.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 29.12.2012 N

Reference:

Bobrova A.V.. On the Single Nature of Resonsibility of Customs Authorities and Participants of Foreign Economic Activity // NB: Administrative Law and Administration Practice. – 2018. – š 2. – P. 9-24.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The subject of the research is the responsibility of customs authorities and their officials, namely the types of offenses and the form of punishments for their commission, on the basis of which direct accountability of customs officials from foreign economic activity participants is possible, as well as indirect prosecution to disciplinary responsibility through higher-ranking officials persons of customs authorities. The aim of the research can be considered the equalization of rights and obligations of all parties to relations in customs, as well as identifying common signs of disciplinary, administrative and criminal liability of customs authorities. The methodological basis of the research consists of principles and methods of systematization and unification of the system of punishments for customs authorities and their officials,as well as the method of comparative analysis of the disciplinary, administrative and criminal responsibility of customs officials. The elements of novelty are proposals for the legal equality of customs officials and participants in foreign economic activity and ways to ensure this equality, as well as the regulation of compensation for damage caused by a government employee to a participant in foreign economic activity. The result of the study can be considered proposals for the creation of a unified system of punishments for customs officials with unified rules of pre-trial settlement and prosecution.

Keywords: anti-corruption measures, criminal offense, administrative offense, disciplinary misconduct, officials, customs authorities, measures, single law, participants of foreign economic activity, bringing to responsibility

References:
Dygay, Yu. A. Normativno-pravovaya reglamentatsiya distsiplinarnoy otvetstvennosti tamozhennykh organov RF // Evraziyskiy nauchnyy zhurnal. 2016. š 10. S. 95-98.
Sidorov, E. I. Pravovaya kharakteristika distsiplinarnogo proizvodstva v deyatel'nosti tamozhennykh organov // Vestnik Rossiyskoy tamozhennoy akademii. 2016. š 2 (35). S. 52-58.
Kozarenko, A. V. Normativno-pravovoe regulirovanie sluzhebnoy distsipliny v tamozhennykh organakh // Akademicheskiy vestnik Rostovskogo filiala Rossiyskoy tamozhennoy akademii. 2015. š 3 (20). S. 34-37.
Kuz'mina, V. E. Distsiplinarnaya otvetstvennost' dolzhnostnykh lits tamozhennykh organov: aktual'nye voprosy pravoprimenitel'noy praktiki // Aktual'nye voprosy sovremennoy nauki. 2015. š 42. S. 268-276.
Chirkov, A. A. Zloupotreblenie dolzhnostnymi polnomochiyami dolzhnostnymi litsami tamozhennykh organov: ugolovno-pravovye i kriminologicheskie aspekty // Otechestvennaya yurisprudentsiya. 2015. š 1 (1). S. 25-29.
Yarysh, V. G. Korruptsiya v tamozhennykh organakh i protivodeystvie e

Reference:

Sevostyanova E.V.. Relief from Administrative Responsibility for Failure to Declare or False Declaration of Goods: Implementation Issues in Eurasian Economic Union Business Environment // NB: Administrative Law and Administration Practice. – 2017. – š 5. – P. 1-10.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The subject of this research is the problems of implementing the institution of relief from administrative responsibility for failure to declare or false declaration of goods in Eurasian Economic Union business environment. The author of the article carries out a detailed analysis of tax and administrative laws as well as law-enforcement practice in ensuring adequacy and objectivity of amnesty granting conditions for faithful participants of tax relations. The author of the article analyses the legal bases to introduce supplementary grounds for relieving from administrative responsibility in case of voluntary elimination of consequences of failure to declare or submission of false information about goods before release of goods. The methodology and methods of research include dialectic materialistic approach and a set of general and special research methods that are based on that approach. These methods have been defined by certain goals and tasks of the research including but not limited to structured system analysis, logical method, generalisation, legalistic method, content analysis, etc. The scientific novelty of the research is caused by the fact that for the first time in the academic literature the author carries out an integral analysis of the legal grounds for relieving from administrative responsibility for failure to declare or false declaratino of goods in both Customs Union and Eurasian Economic Union business environments and offers to introduce supplementary grounds for granting amnesty to a faithful participant of tax relations from administrative responsibility for failure to declare or false declaration of goods.

Keywords: exemption, release of goods, administrative offense, Eurasian economic Union, failure to declare, false declaration, administrative responsibility, declaration, changes, customs

References:
Nyrkova N.A. Administrativnye pravonarusheniya v sfere tamozhennogo deklarirovaniya: problemy otvetstvennosti tamozhennogo predstavitelya v svete zakonodatel'stva i sudebnoy praktiki // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. 2015.
Marchenko M.N. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava: Uchebnik. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Prospekt, 2013.
Lazarev B.M. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost'. M., 1976. S. 11-15.
Zyryanov S.M. Eshche raz ob obshchestvennoy opasnosti administrativnogo pravonarusheniya // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2017. š 6. S. 43-46.
Stepanov V.V. Pravovaya priroda norm o maloznachitel'nosti pravonarusheniya // Leningradskiy yurid. zhurnal. 2007. š 1. S. 139-140.
Grechkina O.V. Administrativnoe proizvodstvo po delam o narushenii tamozhennykh pravil: Avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Chelyabinsk, 2004.
Klyushnikov I.A. Sovershenstvovanie zakonodatel'stva i pravoprimenitel'noy praktiki ob osvobozhdenii ot administrativnoy otvetstvennosti po maloznachitel'nosti pravonarusheniy (po materialam tamozhennykh organov): Avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid

Reference:

Sidorov E.T., Tarasov A.Y.. Some Issues of the Legal Institution of Relief from Administrative Responsibility // NB: Administrative Law and Administration Practice. – 2017. – š 5. – P. 11-21.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The authors of this article examine problems that may arise in the process of relief from administrative responsibility. The subject of the research is the legal rules that regulate the order and procedure for relieving an entity from administrative responsibility as a result of an insignificance of an administrative offense. The object of the research is the legal relations arising between law-enforcement authorities and entities that are held liable for administrative offenses. The authors analyze Articles 2.9, 6.8 and 6.9 of The Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses. The authors of the article emphasize the need to improve administrative laws in order to clarify grounds and rules for implementing the institution of relief from administrative responsibility. The authors also make suggestions regarding what should be changed in Articles 6.8 and 6.9 of The Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses. The methodological basis of the research implies dialectical method, fundamental research concepts, and philosophy that provides a general method of studying the reality. In the course of their research the authors have also applied such methods as historical, legal law, sociological, statistical analysis methods. The main conclusions of the research are the following. Firstly, to observe the principles of legality and expediency when appealing to Article 2.9 of The Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses, the authors suggest to make significant changes to the aforesaid article in order to clarify definitions and criteria to qualify an administrative offense as insignificant. Secondly, the authors prove the need to change Articles 6.8 and 6.9 of The Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses.

Keywords: drug trafficking, seizure, measures to ensure, inspection of a vehicle, proceedings, insignificance of an administrative offense, administrative offense, administrative responsibility, exemption, police officer

References:
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 14.02.2013 š 4-P ŤPo delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti Federal'nogo zakona "O vnesenii izmeneniy v Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh i Federal'nyy zakon "O sobraniyakh, mitingakh, demonst-ratsiyakh, shestviyakh i piketirovaniyakh" v svyazi s zaprosom gruppy deputatov Gosudarstvennoy Dumy i zhaloboy grazhdanina E.V. Savenkoť // Vestnik Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF. š 4. 2013.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 19 dek. 2013 g. š 40 ŤO vnesenii izmeneniy v postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 24 marta 2005 goda š 5 ŤO ne-kotorykh voprosakh, voznikayushchikh u sudov pri primenenii Kodeksa Rossiy-skoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakhť: // Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2014. š 2.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 20 dekabrya 2005 g. š 26 ŤO voprose, voznikshem posle prinyatiya Plenumom Verkhovnogo Suda RF 5 aprelya 2005 g. Postanovleniya š 7 ŤO vnesenii izmenen

Reference:

Mamatov M.V., Maslov I.A.. Administrative responsibility for the violation of the procedure of consideration of citizens appeals // NB: Administrative Law and Administration Practice. – 2017. – š 4. – P. 35-49.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The authors study the issues of legal regulation and implementation of the provisions of article 5.59 of the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation containing administrative responsibility for the violation of the procedure of consideration of citizens’ appeals. The paper analyzes provisions of legislation, organizational and information and guidance documents of Russian prosecution agencies, statistical data and judicial practice. The authors study and assess various viewpoints on the issues of the sphere under consideration including the subjects of such violation, appropriate qualification, etc. The study is based on general scientific dialectical method of cognition and the related scientific methods, structural and functional analysis, logical, legal, statistical methods and the method of legal modeling. The paper presents the results of the analysis of law-enforcement practice of realization of administrative responsibility for the violations contained in article 5.59 of the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation, which reflect the current situation in the sphere under consideration. The authors study statistical data of the key authorities involved in this sphere of relations. The authors conclude that the range of detected problems can be solved by means of law enforcement practice, and some of them need to be regulated.

Keywords: statistics, courts, citizens, appeals, Administrative offences code, Prosecutor, administrative responsibility, elements of offence, practice, law enforcer

References:
Federal'nyy zakon ot 11.07.2011 š 199-FZ ŤO vnesenii izmeneniy v Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakhť i Pasport proekta Federal'nogo zakona š 523986-5 ŤO vnesenii izmeneniy v Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakhť.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 03.12.2011 š 383-FZ ŤO vnesenii izmeneniy v otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsiiť.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 07.05.2013 š 80-FZ ŤO vnesenii izmeneniy v stat'yu 5.59 Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh i stat'i 1 i 2 Federal'nogo zakona O poryadke rassmotreniya obrashcheniy grazhdan Rossiyskoy Federatsiiť.
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 18.07.2012 š 19-P ŤPo delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti chasti 1 stat'i 1, chasti 1 stat'i 2 i stat'i 3 Federal'nogo zakona ŤO poryadke rassmotreniya obrashcheniy grazhdan Rossiyskoy Federatsiiť v svyazi s zaprosom Zakonodatel'nogo Sobraniya Rostovskoy oblastiť.
Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 26.05.2016 š

Reference:

Neganova E.N.. Directions of law-making in the sphere of administrative liability for the breach of the social constitutional right to housing // NB: Administrative Law and Administration Practice. – 2017. – š 3. – P. 1-6.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The research subject is the range of norms of housing law, contained in the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation, aimed at the protection of citizens’ rights against bureaucratic arbitrariness in the sphere of the social constitutional right to housing. The author states that the current compositions of administrative offences on the federal level don’t guarantee proper protection of the realization of the social constitutional right to housing. This fact speaks for the insufficiency of housing law with regard to the necessary administrative sanctions. However, the provisions of the Administrative Offences Code, containing the description of the compositions of administrative offences in the sphere of housing law, are disorganized and chaotic. The author formulates scientific conclusions based on the collection, generalization and analysis of judicial decisions of the courts of different levels and the materials of prosecutor’s practice contained in the reports, newsletters and information letters of the prosecutors of the Russian Federation and other levels for 2005 – 2016. The author also uses the comparative-legal method to analyze the provisions of administrative and housing law. In order to eliminate the legislative gaps in housing law, it is necessary to formalize the right to improved housing and the registration of those needing housing, thus guaranteeing citizens’ constitutional rights to housing. The administrative offences compositions system in the sphere of the right to housing, contained in the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation, should be structured in accordance with the general fundamentals of law and constitutional law.

Keywords: different categories of citizens, Russian citizens, stateless persons, foreign citizens, rental agreement, sanctions, administrative liability, right to housing, housing rights, social housing resources

References:
Mozymova E.N. Prokuror garant zashchity zhilishchnykh prav nesovershennoletnikh // Yurist. 2004. š 10. S. 53-55.
Neganova E.N. Pravovoy status detey-sirot i detey, ostavshikhsya bez popecheniya roditeley, v sfere obespecheniya zhil'em // Pravovoy status rebenka v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: monografiya / ruk. avt. kol. O.P. Pristanskaya. NII Akad. Gen. prokuratury Ros. Federatsii. M. 2011. S. 163-173.
Chashina O.Yu. Novye sostavy moshennichestva // Sovetnik yurista. 2013. š 2. S. 87-95.
Yani P. Spetsial'nye vidy moshennichestva // Zakonnost'. 2015. š 4. S. 23-28.

Reference:

Lipinsky D.A., Musatkina A.A.. Goals and functions of administrative punishments // NB: Administrative Law and Administration Practice. – 2017. – š 2. – P. 20-37.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The research object covers the goals and functions of administrative punishments; the research subject is the range of administrative norms predetermining the functioning of the administrative punishments institution. Along with the functions, traditional for administrative punishments, which are the punitive and the preventive ones, the authors give special attention to the regulative and the reconstructive functions. The authors note the close connection between the goals and functions of administrative punishments and the tasks of the legislation on administrative offences, and study the peculiarities of realization of each of the functions of administrative punishment. Within particular functions, the authors outline sub-functions, which reflect particular aspects of realization of the particular function. The authors apply functional and teleological methods, and comparative-legal and formal-legal methods. The basic research method is the dialectical method. Some conclusions and provisions are based on the methods of deduction and induction, analysis and synthesis, and the philosophical principle of transition from quantity to quality and the unity and struggle of opposites. The authors come to the following conclusions:

Administrative punishments have the following goals: regulation of social relations; punishing an administrative offender; prevention of administrative offences and crimes; restoration of social relations; correction of the offender. The authors formulate the new version of the article 1.2 of the Administrative Offences Code “Tasks of the legislation of the Russian Federation on administrative offences”: The tasks of the legislation on administrative offences include: protection of a personality, and human and civil rights and freedoms; protection of citizens’ health and sanitary and epidemiological welfare of the population; protection of public morality, environment, the established public order and public safety and property; protection of legal economic interests of persons and legal entities, the society and the state against administrative offences, and prevention of administrative offences”.
Functions of administrative punishment are the directions of its impact on social relations and legal consciousness of subjects, which reveal its social purpose and achieve its goals.
A regulative function of administrative punishment is the direction of administrative impact, which consists in ordering behavior of the subjects of administrative responsibility both prior to and after the administrative offence, and the use of measures of administrative punishment by authorized bodies.
A preventive function of administrative punishment is a direction of legal impact, which consists in the prevention of an administrative offence or a crime described in the Criminal Code.
A reconstructive function of administrative punishment is legal impact on the breached social relations for the purpose of their ordering, reconstruction, and restoration of social justice and order.
A punitive function is the imposition of personal, property, organizational, psychological or other restrictions on the offender.

Keywords: goals of punishment, types of punishments, legal responsibility , administrative punishment, administrative responsibility, prevention, reconstruction , function, regulation, punishment

References:
Mal'ko A.V., Shundikov K.V. Tseli i sredstva v prave i pravovoy politike. Saratov: SGAP, 2003. 144 s.
Lipinskiy D.A. Problemy yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti. SPb.: Yuridicheskiy Tsentr Press, 2003. 390 s.
Musatkina A.A. K voprosu o institute administrativnoy otvetstvennosti // Administrativnoe pravo i administrirovanie. 2015. š 3. C/ 30-43
Askerov M.M. Tseli naznacheniya administrativnykh nakazaniy // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel'stve. 2015. š 3. C. 15-21.
Onokolov Yu.P. Glavnaya tsel' administrativnykh nakazaniy preventsiya administrativnykh pravonarusheniy i prestupleniy // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2014. š 8. S. 37-40.
Maksimov S.V. Administrativnye nakazaniya. M.: Norma, 2009. S. 464 s.
Mal'ko A.V., Shundikov K.V. Tseli i sredstva v prave i pravovoy politike. Saratov: SGAP, 2003. 144 s.
Lodenko I.S., Tul'chinskiy G.L. Logika tselevogo upravleniya. Novosibirsk, 1988. 380 s.
Rad'ko T.N. Teoriya funktsiy prava. M.: Prospekt, 2014. 220 s.
Suvorova O.Yu. Sistema, printsipy i tseli admi

Reference:

Karavaev A.O., Zabaykalov A.. On particular aspects of an Internet Service Providers responsibility for copyright infringement on the Internet // NB: Administrative Law and Administration Practice. – 2016. – š 5. – P. 17-25.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Read the article

Abstract: The article considers the topical aspects of a provider’s responsibility for copyright infringement on the Internet. The authors study the particular gaps and inconsistences in the legal regulation of this sphere. Particularly, the authors note the shortcomings of the normative conceptual framework typical for anti-counterfeiting legislation. The authors analyze the approaches to this problem, applied in foreign countries and in Russia, substantiate and formulate the suggestions about the improvement of the current Russian legislation. The research methodology is based on the traditional principles and methods of jurisprudence: dialectics, analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, etc. The authors conclude that the constant resource locking, prescribed by the Federal Law of 2 July 2013 No 187 “On amending particular statutory instruments of the Russian Federation on the issues of copyright protection in information and telecommunication networks”, contradicts the basic principles of civil law. It is particularly important in the context of the absence of real mechanisms of interlock bypass prevention. Besides, the authors give attention to the problems of legal regulation of an “information intermediary” status.

Keywords: responsibility, content, information intermediary, Internet, blocking, copyright, rightholder, user, provider, site

References:
Nikolaev V.V. Ogranichenie dostupa k internet-resursu kak mera gosudarstvennogo prinuzhdeniya // Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie. - 2015. - 2. - C. 240 - 245.
Khurtin D.O. Kompetentsiya Roskomnadzora po vyyavleniyu administrativnykh pravonarusheniy, posyagayushchiy na prava intellektual'noy sobstvennosti v informatsionno-telekommunikatsionnoy seti ŤInternetť. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2014. - š9. - C. 965 - 970.
Minkomsvyaz': chislo pol'zovateley, pokupayushchikh legal'nyy kontent, vyroslo do 18 mln chelovek. - Rezhim dostupa: http://tass.ru/obschestvo/2400019 (data obrashcheniya: 19.07.2016 g.).
Postanovlenie Sed'mogo Arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 06 marta 2014 g. š A03-12782/2013. - Rezhim dostupa: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc;base=RAPS007;n=66648 (data obrashcheniya: 19.07.2016 g.).
Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii (chast' chetvertaya) ot 18 dekabrya 2006 g. š 230-FZ (red. ot 03 iyunya 2016 g.) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. - 2006. - š 52 (1 ch.). - St. 5496.

Reference:
Bombitskii A.M.. Administrative responsibility and its implementation in cases of breaches of the legislation on contract system in procurement of goods, works, and services for state and municipal needs // NB: Administrative Law and Administration Practice. – 2015. – š 4. – P. 129-141.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Read the article
up

Abstract: The article focuses on legal and organizational problems of implementation of administrative responsibility for breaches of the legislation on contract system in procurement of goods, works, and services for state and municipal needs. The author carries out a detailed theoretical and legal analysis of the concepts of administrative responsibility. The article presents the author's position on the concept of legal regulation of administrative responsibility. The main attention is paid to the development of methods and methodology of administrative-legal regulation of responsibility in administrative law. The study shows the author's position on the interpretation and legal regulation of these categories. The methodological basis of the article comprises the current achievements of epistemology. The author applies the general philosophical and theoretical methods (dialectics, the systems method, analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, observation, modeling), the traditional legal methods (formal logical), and the methods used in specific sociological studies (statistical, expert evaluation, etc.). The author concludes that at present in order to ensure legality in the sphere of procurement of goods, works and services for state and municipal needs it is necessary to improve the forms and methods of administrative-legal regulation in this sphere. The main contribution of the author is the conclusion about the necessity to develop administrative-legal regulation of responsibility in the sphere of public procurement. The novelty of the article lies in the proposals for the development of forms and methods of state regulation of administrative responsibility and the creation of legal and institutional guarantees of legality in public procurement.

Keywords: the contract, service, purchase, responsibility, auction, system, work, delivery, ensure, needs

References:
Alekseev S.S. Obshchaya teoriya prava. T. 1.-M., 1981.-S. 35.
Yavich L.S. Nauchno-tekhnicheskaya revolyutsiya i yuridicheskaya nauka // Pravovedenie.-1973.-š 5.-S. 50.
Dal' V.I. Tolkovyy slovar' zhivogo velikorusskogo yazyka. T. 2.-M., 1994.-S. 1863.
Galagan I.A. Metodologicheskie problemy obshchey teorii yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti po sovetskomu pravu // Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost': problemy, soderzhanie ustanovlenie, realizatsiya.-Voronezh, 1989.-S. 11.
Mal'tsev V.V. Sotsial'naya otvetstvennost' lichnosti, ugolovnoe pravo i ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' // Pravovedenie. 2000. š
S. 154. 6. Tarkhov V.A. Ponyatie yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti // Pravovedenie. 1973. š 2. S. 35.
Leyst O.E. Sanktsii v sovetskom prave. M., 1962. S. 94.
Cherdantsev A.F., Kozhevnikov S.P. O ponyatii i soderzhanii yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti // Pravovedenie. 1975. š 5. S. 41.
Teoriya gosudarstva i prava / Pod red. N.I. Matuzova, A.V. Mal'ko. M., 1997. S. 540.
Bogdanova M.S. O ponimanii yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti v sovremen

Reference:
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V., Myshlyaev N.P.. Causes and conditions of administrative offences // NB: Administrative Law and Administration Practice. – 2015. – š 3. – P. 44-62.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Read the article
up

Abstract: The article focuses on the problems of legal and organizational measures related to the administrative and legal regulation of establishing the causes and conditions of administrative offences. The authors carry out the theoretical and legal analysis of the concepts of legal regulation establishing the causes and conditions of administrative offences. The article presents the authors' position on the notion of administrative-legal prevention of offences and establishment of personal and professional qualities of the subject of an administrative offence. The main attention is paid to the development of methods and methodology of administrative-legal regulation of establishment of the causes and conditions of administrative offences. In addition, the article presents a theoretical and legal analysis of concepts of preventive activities in the sphere of administrative legal regulation. The article considers the authors' positions concerning the interpretation and legal regulation of these categories. The methodology of the research is based on the recent achievements of epistemology. The authors use the general philosophical and theoretical methods (dialectics, the systems method, analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, observation, modeling), the traditional legal methods (formal logic), as well as the methods used in the concrete sociological research (statistical, expert evaluations, etc.).The authors conclude that to provide law and order in the sphere of administrative law it is necessary to improve the forms and methods of establishment of the causes and conditions of administrative offences. The main contribution of the authors is the conclusion about the necessity to develop administrative regulations of identification of potential subjects of administrative offences. The novelty of the article lies in the proposals for the development of forms and methods of administrative-legal regulation of preventive activity, and the creation of legal and institutional guarantees of legality in our country.

Keywords: punishment, sanction, offence, competence, police, delict, result, reason, condition, base

References:
Avanesov G.A. Teoriya i metodologiya kriminologicheskogo prognozirovaniya. M., 1972. S. 218.
Kuznetsova N.F. Kriminologiya kak nauka // Sovetskaya yustitsiya. 1970, š 2. S. 8.
Filosofskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar'. M., 1983. S. 707.
Filosofskaya entsiklopediya. M., 1960. T. 1. S. 206.
Kobzar' I.A. Sotsial'naya i kriminologicheskaya obuslovlennost' ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti nesovershennoletnikh (teoriya i praktika). M., 1998. S. 36.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Kontseptual'nye osnovy profilaktiki pravonarusheniy // Materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii po probleme profilaktiki pravonarusheniy. M., 1997. S. 10.
Sakharov A.B. O lichnosti prestupnika i prichinakh prestupnosti v SSSR. M., 1961. S. 58.
Antonyan Yu.M. Sotsial'naya sreda i formirovanie lichnosti prestupnika. M., 1975. S. 5.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Prichinnost' v kriminologii. M., 1968. S. 10.
Karpets I.I. Problemy prestupnosti. M., 1969. S. 69.
Bilyalov A.K. Ob opredelenii kategoriy Ťosnovať i Ťosnovanieť // Filosofskie nauki. 1976. š 5. S. 142.
Lazarev B.

Reference:
Lipinsky D.A.. Functions of administrative responsibility // NB: Administrative Law and Administration Practice. – 2015. – š 3. – P. 63-93.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Read the article
up

Abstract: The subject of the research is the range of norms of administrative law which regulate the punitive, regulative, preventive and other spheres of action of administrative responsibility. The object of the research is the range of social relations in the sphere of administrative-legal regulation. The author substantiates the punitive, preventive, restorative and educational functions of administrative responsibility. He studies the structure of functions of legal responsibility in terms of its broad understanding, including the positive and negative aspects of realization. The paper notes the shortcomings of the Code of Administrative Offences and offers recommendations aimed at the enhancement of the existing legislation. The author uses the dialectical method, the comparative-legal method, the formal-legal method and the structural-functional analysis. The author comes to the following conclusions:
1. The Code of Administrative Offences if characterized by the “continuity” of the shortcomings of the expired Code of Administrative Offences of the RSFSR. It contains the doubling of compositions of tax offences and at the same time not all administrative offences have been included in the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation; the Code provides the following forms of administrative punishment: warning, administrative fine, confiscation of a crime instrument or a subject of administrative offence, deprivation of a special right, administrative arrest. Administrative banishment from the Russian Federation and onerous confiscation of a crime instrument in their legal nature are not the measures of administrative punishment. They are the measures of protection. Additional measures of protection are banishment from the Russian Federation, onerous confiscation of a crime instrument, applied simultaneously with the measures of administrative punishment, are aimed at strengthening of restorative effect of administrative responsibility if ordinary measures are not enough.
2. Liquidation of a legal person, suspension of a license, nullification of a license, prohibition of certain forms of activity are effective ways of private prevention of administrative offences since they exclude the subject from a definite sphere of social relations and deprive it of an actual and legal opportunity to commit a similar offence, but they should be contained in a single systematized normative-legal act – the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation, the more so because the legislator has chosen this way of administrative responsibility imposition.
3. Administrative disqualification, deprivation of a special right, suspension of a license, annulation of a license, confiscation of a crime instrument exclude an actual or legal opportunity to commit an administrative offence in definite spheres of social relations and thus further their normalization and restoration; the prevalence of fines in administrative sanctions indicates that the state considers a fine not only as the means of punishment and prevention but also as the means of budget replenishment and compensation of losses incurred by the state in the result of the committed crime. Each administrative offence damages not only the aggrieved party but the state in whole, and the fine is one of the ways of compensation of the damage.

Keywords: administrative and legal regulation, types of functions, administrative offenses, operation of responsibility, restorative function, regulatory function, functions of responsibility, legal responsibility, punitive function, administrative responsibility

References:
Pankratov V.V., Guseva T.A. Problemy administrativnoy otvetstvennosti v sfere nalogooblozheniya i predprinimatel'stva (k proektu novogo Kodeksa ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh) // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2000. š 9. − S. 53.
Shaburov A.S. Tseli i funktsii yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava / Pod red. V.M. Korel'skogo, V.D. Perevalova. − M., 1998. − S. 421.
Mal'ko A.V. Stimuly i ogranicheniya v prave // Pravovedenie. 1998. š 3. − S. 134
Fatkullin F.N. Problemy teorii gosudarstva i prava. − Kazan', 1987. − S. 233
Mal'ko A.V. Yuridicheskie pooshchritel'nye sanktsii // Atrium. Ser. ŤYurisprudentsiyať. š
− Tol'yatti: Izd-vo MABiBD, 1996. − S. 6. 6.Starilov Yu.N. Printsipy administrativnogo prava: ponyatie i sistema // Vestnik VUiT. Ser. ŤYurisprudentsiyať. Vyp. 5. − Tol'yatti, 1999. − S. 44.
Kazimirchuk V.P., Shneyder Kh.Kh. Sotsiologiya upravleniya/Problemy sotsiologii prava. Vil'nyus, 1970. − S. 30.
Mitskevich L.A. Administrativ

Reference:
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V., Myshlyaev N.P.. Classification of administrative and preventive measures // NB: Administrative Law and Administration Practice. – 2015. – š 2. – P. 72-88.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Read the article
up

Abstract: The article focuses on legal and organizational problems of administrative and legal regulation of prevention of administrative offences. The authors carry out the theoretical and legal analysis of the concepts of legal regulation of preventive activities from the position of administrative-legal regulation of law enforcement. The paper presents the authors' positions towards the notion of administrative and legal prevention of offences. The main attention is paid to the development of methods and methodology of administrative and legal regulation of prevention of offences. In addition, the article presents the theoretical and legal analysis of the concepts of preventive activities in the sphere of administrative legal regulation. The article provides the authors' positions concerning the interpretation and legal regulation of these categories. The methodology of the research is based on the recent achievements of epistemology. The author uses the general philosophical and theoretical methods (dialectics, the systems method, analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, observation, modeling), the traditional legal methods (formal-logical) and the methods, used in special sociological research (the statistical method, expert assessments, etc.)On the base of the research the authors conclude that at present in order to develop the rule of law in the sphere of activity of administrative legislation it is necessary to improve the forms and methods of administrative, legal and preventive influence. The main contribution of the authors lies in the statement about the need to develop administrative-legal regulation of prevention of administrative offenses. The novelty of the article consists in the proposals for the development of forms and methods of administrative-legal regulation of preventive activities, and the creation of legal and institutional guarantees of legality in Russia.

Keywords: jurisdiction, delictology, delict, law enforcement, work, system, classification, police, prevention, coercion

References:
Popov L.L., Shergin A.P. Upravlenie, grazhdanin, otvetstvennost'. M., 1975.
Administrativnaya deyatel'nost' organov vnutrennikh del / Pod red A.P. Koreneva. M., 1999. S. 231.
Zelentsov A.B. Konflikty v upravlenii i upravlenie konfliktami: Opyt kompleksnogo issledovaniya predmeta i form administrativnoy yurisdiktsii. M., 2001. S. 214.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Prichiny pravonarusheniy. M., 1976. S. 87.
Savvin M.Ya., Silaev A.I. Effektivnost' administrativno-pravovoy deyatel'nosti organov vnutrennikh del v sfere okhrany obshchestvennogo poryadka i ee otsenka. M., 1990. S. 17-18.
Genzyuk E.E. Administrativnaya deliktologiya: Disd-ra. yurid. nauk. M., 2001. S. 222.
Studenikin S.S. Sovetskoe administrativnoe pravo. M., 1949. S. 133.
Aksel' M. Novaya sotsial'naya zashchita. Perev. s frants. M., 1970. S. 219.
Reshetnikov F. M. Ugolovnoe pravo burzhuaznykh stran. Vyp. III. M., 1967. S. 33.
Piontkovskiy A.A. Ugolovnoe pravo RSFSR. Chast' obshchaya. M., 1924. S. 75, 81.
Ugolovnoe pravo zarubezhnykh gosudarstv. Vyp. IV. M., 1976. S. 1

Reference:
Motin V.V., Trofimov O.E.. Problems of security guarantees in water transportation. // NB: Administrative Law and Administration Practice. – 2013. – š 12. – P. 51-65. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.12.1087.

DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.12.1087

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Read the article
up

Abstract: The article concerns the problems of transportation security guarantees in water transportation in the conditions of active involvement of the Siberian rivers into the economic activities. The authors offers the ways to improve the legal regulation of transporation infrastructure functioning. The water economic complex in the Russian Federation is one of the largest in the world. Based upon the historical experience, one may state that more active use of transportation capabilities of waterways in the Siberian regions may serve as a catalyst for the further economic development of the Russian Federation. Some experts consider that in the second half of the XXI century the global struggle shall be for the water resources. Obligatory compliance for the environmental requirements to preservation of biological resources in Russia is especially topical at all of the stages of economic activities. Taking into consideration the role and perspectives of development of transportation infrastructure in the Russian economy, there is need to unify the documents regulating the relations in the sphere of transportation into a single document - the Transportation Code.

Keywords: transportation security, water transportation, development of waterways, legal regulation, transportation infrastructure, transportation code, environment, security of transportation of goods, shipping canal, potential

References:
Ot PIN-koda k kibervoyne. Biznesmen Evgeniy Kasperskiy o neobkhodimosti sozdaniya KiberMAGATE. // http://www.izvestia.ru/news/526680
SShA i Izrail' obvinili v razrabotke Ťsupervirusať // http://www.rg.ru/2012/06/20/virus-site.html
Kitayskiy internet vse bol'she podvergaetsya vneshnim setevym atakam // http://russian.people.com.cn/31521/7763896.html
Kibervoyska Severnoy Korei-3 tysyachi elitnykh khakerov // http://www.cnews.ru/top/2012/06/09/kibervoyska_severnoy_korei__3_tysyachi_elitnyh_hakerov_492597
Strategicheskie napravleniya issledovaniy i razrabotok na srednesrochnuyu perspektivu (2012-2015 gg.) // http://www.rzd-expo.ru/innovation/technology_platform_quot_high_intellectual_rail_transport_quot/Tehnologicheskaya_platforma_2012_2015.pdf
V Moskve ischeznut posty DPS // http://www.buhgalteria.ru/news/n57561
Moskovskiy mezhdunarodnyy kongress po intellektual'nym transportnym sistemam // http://www.pibd.ru/2012its22/
Prikaz Ministerstva transporta Rossiyskoy Federatsii (Mintrans Rossii) ot 12 aprelya 201

Reference:
Kurakin A.V., Badulin A.D., Tregubova E.V.. Administrative Responsibility for Violations on the Alcohol Market and the Role of Police in Legal Enforcement of Administrative Responsibility // NB: Administrative Law and Administration Practice. – 2013. – š 10. – P. 28-74. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.10.1015.

DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.10.1015

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Read the article
up

Abstract: It should be said that administrative responsiblity for violating the rules of production and turnover of ethyl alcohol, alcohol and alcohol-containing products makes an important contribution to reinforcement of legal order in this sphere. Administrative responsibility under review allows to make a differentiated influence on violators in the sphere of production and turnover of ethyl alcohol, alcohol and alcohol-containing products, in particular, physical, official and legal entities. Moreover, this form of legal responsibility allows the governmet to prevent and eliminate any crime which can be commited on the alcohol market. Therefore, enforcement of administrative responsibility for violating the rules of production an turnover of ethyl alcohol, alcohol and alcohol-containing products plays an important role in the development of a civilized market of alcohol production and prevents from excessive use of alcohol by the Russian population.

Keywords: principle, production, alcohol beverages, ethyl alcohol, responsibility, turnover, abuse, alcohol addiction, supervision, regulation

References:
Obshchaya teoriya prava i gosudarstva / Pod red. V.V. Lazareva. M., 1996.
Cherdantsev A.F., Kozhevnikov S.P. O ponyatii i soderzhanii yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti // Pravovedenie. 1975. š 5.
Khropanyuk V.N. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava. M., 1993.
Teoriya gosudarstva i prava / Pod red. A.I. Denisova. M., 1972.
Yuridicheskaya psikhologiya / Pod red. Yu.V Chufarovskogo. M., 1998.
Tarkhov V.A. Ponyatie yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti // Pravovedenie. 1973. š 2.
Tregubova E.V. Pravovoy zapret v mekhanizme realizatsii administrativnoy otvetstvennosti // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2008. š 10.
Savel'eva V.S. Osnovy kvalifikatsii prestupleniy. M., 2006.
Skvortsov S.M. Printsipy nalozheniya administrativnykh vzyskaniy i ikh realizatsiya v deyatel'nosti organov vnutrennikh del. M., 1984.
Samoshchenko I.S., Farukshin M.Kh. Otvetstvennost' po sovetskomu zakonodatel'stvu. M., 1971.
Teoriya gosudarstva i prava / Pod red. N.I. Matuzova, A.V. Mal'ko. M., 1997.
Syrovatskaya L.A. Otvetstvennost' po sove

Reference:
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V.. Concerning the Grounds of Administrative Responsibility in the Russian Legislation // NB: Administrative Law and Administration Practice. – 2013. – š 10. – P. 75-88. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.10.1015.

DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.10.1015

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Read the article
up

Abstract: The article is devoted to the grounds of administrative responsibility and describes peculiarities and features of administrative offence. The authors of the article conclude that the definition of administrative offece as it is provided by the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation should also inclue social security as a feature. The authors outline general features typical for all administrative offences and distinguishing administrative offences from legal behavior and other violations of law. It is noted that a classical definition of guilt cannot apply to a legal entity. It is said that a socially dangeous act prohibited by the law is recognized as an administrative offence only if commitment of such an act implies administrative responsibility. The authors also consider the difference between administrative offences from other violations of law according to legal features: the main material feature, illegal nature of the act and penalties for law violator. It is stressed out that administrative offence means violation of rules of general effect (violation of discipline). The authors also describe the difference between civil law delicts and adminitrative offences and offer a clear definition of administrative offence.

Keywords: offence, delict, law, component elements, punishment, violation of law, responsibility, implementation, grounds, threat

References:
Tagantsev N.S. Russkoe ugolovnoe pravo. Chast' obshchaya. T.1. M., 1994.
Seregin A.V. Osnovaniya i poryadok primeneniya mer administrativnogo vozdeystviya. M., 1974.
Petelin B.Ya. Vina kak obstoyatel'stvo, podlezhashchee dokazyvaniyu po delu // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1981. š11.
Martynov I.A. Institut isklyucheniya deliktnosti deyaniya v administrativnom prave: Avtoref. dis. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2006.
Kovalenko D., Marushko M. Pravovaya priroda instituta administrativnoy otvetstvennosti yuridicheskikh lits // Yustitsiya Belorussii. 2005. š9.
Kurakin A.V. Kvalifikatsiya administrativnykh pravonarusheniy. M., 2001.
Kolesnichenko Yu.Yu. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' yuridicheskikh lits: Avtoref. dis. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2000.
Kotyurgin S.I. O vine po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Obshcheteoreticheskie problemy administrativno-pravovogo obespecheniya obshchestvennogo poryadka. Kiev, 1982.
Koval' L.V. Administrativno-pravovoe deliktnoe otnoshenie: Avtoref. dis. d-ra yurid. nauk. Kiev, 19

Reference:
Kabanov P.A.. The qualification requirements to the members of the Commissions on compliance with the requirements to service behavior of state (municipal) servants and conflict of interests regulation for those not holding state (municipal) service positions. // NB: Administrative Law and Administration Practice. – 2013. – š 3. – P. 25-33. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.3.657.

DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.3.657

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Read the article
up

Abstract: The article formulates general and specific qualification requirements to the members of the Commissions on compliance with the requirements to service behavior of state (municipal) servants and conflict of interests regulation for those not holding state (municipal) service positions on professional competence disputes. Among such criteria the author singles out professional education of the relevant level, relevant position in educational or scientific research institution, working experience in state (municipal) service, impeccable reputation. The author also offers classification of the members of the Commissions on compliance with the requirements to service behavior of state (municipal) servants and conflict of interests regulation for those not holding state (municipal) service positions depending on legislative prescriptions on municipal (state) service - into those who are obligated to be included into such commissions, and those who may be included into such commission upon discretion of the head of the state or municipal body.

Keywords: state service, state servant, municipal service, municipal servant, independent expert, representative of the public, conflict of interests, professional qualification, qualification requirements, compliance to requirements

References:
Astanin V.V. Komissii po soblyudeniyu trebovaniy k sluzhebnomu povedeniyu gosudarstvennykh grazhdanskikh sluzhashchikh i uregulirovaniyu konflikta interesov: analiz i otsenka predmeta deyatel'nosti i korruptsiogennykh riskov uchastiya ekspertov v ikh rabote // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2009. š2.
Bikeev I.I., Kabanov P.A., Maklakova A.N. i dr. Organizatsiya raboty komissiy po soblyudeniyu trebovaniy k sluzhebnomu povedeniyu i uregulirovaniyu konflikta interesov v organakh mestnogo samoupravleniya Respubliki Tatarstan: metodicheskoe posobie. Kazan': Izd-vo ŤPoznanieť Instituta ekonomiki, upravleniya i prava, 2012.
Deytseva N.A., Martynov, A.V. Administrativno-pravovoe regulirovanie deyatel'nosti komissiy po soblyudeniyu trebovaniy k sluzhebnomu povedeniyu grazhdanskikh sluzhashchikh i uregulirovaniyu konfliktov interesov //Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2010. š7.
Dement'ev A.N. Konflikt interesov na gosudarstvennoy grazhdanskoy i munitsipal'noy sluzhbe // Grazhdanin i pravo. 2011. š2.
Kabanov P.A. Oznakomlenie s materialami uchastn

Reference:
Moskvina Y.V.. Material Damage Resulting From a Traffic Accident as a Circumstance Aggravating Administrative Responsibility // NB: Administrative Law and Administration Practice. – 2013. – š 2. – P. 81-90. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.2.597.

DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.2.597

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Read the article
up

Abstract: The article outlines the problem of efficiency of administrative law sanctions in the sphere of traffic safety. The Administrative Offence Code of the Russian Federation does not provide for the opportunity of an official who reviews the case of administrative offence of the Traffic Code to take into account negative consequences of such offence. At the present time circumstances under which the offence was committed and/or the amount or nature of the damage are only stated as facts but do not influence the degree of punishment or sanction. In order to realize the principles of justice, proportionality and personalization of responsibility, Section 12 of the Administrative Offence Code of the Russian Federation must contain a definite description of sanctions for violating the Traffic Code and material damage must be regarded as a circumstance aggravating administrative responsibility.

Keywords: security, traffic, traffic code, material damage, administrative responsibility, circumstance, traffic accident, aggravating circumstance

References:
Kuzhuget, S.S. Obstoyatel'stva, otyagchayushchie administrativnuyu otvetstvennost', i ikh znachenie v yurisdiktsionnoy deyatel'nosti organov vnutrennikh del: Uchebnoe posobie. Khabarovsk: Khabarovskaya vysshaya shkola MVD SSSR. 1987 S. 63.
Rossinskiy, B.V. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' v oblasti dorozhnogo dvizheniya: Postateynyy kommentariy. M.: Izdatel'stvo Norma. 2002 S. 246.
Bakhaev, A.A. Administrativno-pravovoe regulirovanie dorozhnogo dvizheniya: voprosy bezopasnosti i otvetstvennosti: dis. kand. yurid. nauk Chelyabinsk, 2009 S. 54.
Shergin, A.P. Osnovnye tendentsii razvitiya sovremennogo administrativno-deliktnogo zakonodatel'stva RF / Aktual'nye voprosy administrativno-pravovogo regulirovaniya v sovremennoy Rossii: Materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, posvyashchennoy 70-letiyu Zasluzhennogo yurista RF, doktora yuridicheskikh nauk, professora I.I. Veremeenko /Otv. red. dokt. Yurid. nauk, prof. A.S. Dugenets, dokt. Yurid. nauk, prof. V.I. Mayorov. M.: VNII MVD Rossii, YuUrGU. 2008 S. 99.
Golov