Ðóñ Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 2065,   Articles in work: 293 Declined articles: 786 
  • Issues
  • About the Journal
  • Requirements for publication
  • Editorial collegium
  • Editorial board
  • Peer-review process
  • Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it?
  • Policy of publication. Aims & Scope.
  • Article retraction
  • Ethics
  • Copyright & Licensing Policy
  • Open Access Policy
  • Open access publishing costs
  • Article Identification Policy
  • Plagiarism check policy
  • Digital archiving policy
  • Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it?
  • In memoriam
  • Liability in administrative and municipal law
  • Administrative and municipal legal practice
  • Administrative legal regimes and local self-government
  • Administrative law, municipal law and security
  • Administrative law, municipal law and other branches of law
  • Administrative law, municipal law and consumer protection
  • Administrative law, municipal law and the institutions of civil society
  • Administrative law, municipal law and institutes of democracy
  • Administrative law, municipal law and information security
  • Administrative law, municipal law and tax administration
  • Administrative law, municipal law and human rights
  • Administrative law, municipal law and property rights
  • Administrative law, municipal law and the issues of informatization
  • Administrative law, municipal law and the issues of culture
  • Administrative law, municipal law and the issues of migration
  • Administrative law, municipal law and issues in education
  • Administrative law, municipal law and environment issues
  • Administrative law, municipal law and the issues of political science
  • Administrative law, municipal law and the issues of education
  • Administrative law, municipal law and the issues of legal theory
  • Administrative law, municipal law and the issues of federalism
  • Administrative law, municipal law and the judicial branch
  • Administrative law, municipal law and judicial reforms
  • Administrative, municipal law and federal structure of the state
  • Administrative law, municipal law and financial activity
  • Administrative and municipal law: business, economy, finance
  • Administrative and municipal law: forms and methods of implementation (practice)
  • Administrative law and local self-government
  • Administrative enforcement
  • Administrative process and procedure
  • Issue of the day
  • Question at hand
  • Public service, municipal service and issues in the fight against corruption
  • Public and municipal service and the citizen
  • Debatable issues in administrative and municipal law
  • Executive authorities and the civil society
  • Legislation commentary
  • Reviews and bibliography
  • Tax administration
  • Academic life
  • Law-enforcement legislation
  • Issues of administrative and municipal legal relationship
  • Issues of Administrative and municipal legal science
  • Issues in settling of administrative and municipal disputes
  • Public law: New challenges and realities
  • About the authors
  • Subjects/Legal entities in administrative and financial law
  • Legal entities of administrative and financial law
  • Theory and science of administrative and municipal law
  • Management law
  • Monograph peer reviews
«NB: Administrative Law and Administration Practice»
Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it?
Fast peer-review (without loss of quality) became possible thanks to digital (paperless) technologies and constant expansion of the Institute of reviewers cooperating with our publishing house.

When you submit your manuscript to our journal, you always specify the corresponding code of the scientific specialty. The personal profile of the reviewer also includes his code of scientific specialty.

In case of positive results of the automatic checking of submitted article to the level of originality (the AntiPlagiarism & AntiRewrite online services), the Chief Editor decides 'To send the new article for peer review.' This action means that the Chief Editor instructs our online system for mailing notifications automatically about the receipt of a new article to all peer-reviewers who have the corresponding code of scientific specialty.

If the peer reviewer wishes to give an opinion on your article, he takes your item in processing (other peer-reviewers no longer have access to your article) and must provide a review to the Chief Editor within 24 hours. Both the Editorial Board and the peer reviewers based on the fact that a qualifying specialist in the considered scientific problem is capable analyze in-depth the article and provide a reasonable decision within the above mentioned time. The section 'Peer-review process' gives you more details about the structure of the peer reviewer's conclusion.

Because the online system uses sole the codes of scientific specialties to identify articles and reviewers, we provide a guarantee of the implementation of the principle of 'double-blind' peer review.

Unfortunately, the peer review time may increase due to objective and subjective reasons (for example, the reviewers on vacation, lack of interest in the topic, etc.). Also, an increase in the peer-reviewing time occurs if the Editorial Board disagreed with the arguments of the peer reviewer, or the opinions of the peer reviewers are contrary. In this case, the article goes for additional expert evaluation to another peer reviewer. However, the Editorial Board does its best to let you know about your article's future as soon as possible.