Abstract: Despite the ongoing measures to combat corruption in the judicial system of the Russian Federation, there remain cases when the presiding judge in a case is guided not by the norms of laws, but by personal and other material interests, which necessitates a change in the approach to identify, eliminate the causes, prevent, disclose, investigate corruption offenses, minimize and eliminate such offenses. The subject of the study is the norms of constitutional, civil and administrative law, other normative legal and judicial acts defining the procedural provisions of ongoing trials in the Russian Federation. The purpose of the research is to study the existing measures to combat corruption in the judicial system, as well as to develop proposals aimed at identifying and suppressing them. In the course of the research, the following methods were used: dialectical, logical, systemic, functional, formal-legal, comparative-legal research methods. The study analyzes the main legislative provisions related to combating corruption, as well as procedural norms of the law of judicial processes. The novelty of the research is the consideration of judicial instances as a single entity, where judges are divided not by specific courts where they carry out their official activities, but by internal conviction, and judges are united depending on the judicial instance. At the same time, the concealment of information about the judges themselves and the introduction of certain prohibitions on establishing their identity by the participants in the process will not only reduce the dependence of judges on the participants in the process, but also increase their personal security and reduce corruption. The analysis of the conducted research allowed us to establish that currently in the Russian Federation there are cases of corruption in the judicial system, where one of the main directions is the imposition of an illegal and unjustified court order, and in some cases the acquittal of a person who committed a crime. In this regard, it is proposed to reform the process of justice, which is based on the concealment of information about the identity of the presiding judges.

Keywords: concealment of information, personal data, reformation, digitalization, judges, the trial, judicial system, rights, corruption, operational activities

Abstract: This article examines ways to improve the institute of rehabilitation of individuals and legal entities illegally brought to administrative responsibility in Russian administrative law. The substantiation is given that the institute of administrative and legal rehabilitation consists of a set of actions aimed at making a decision to terminate administrative prosecution on rehabilitative grounds, restoring an innocent person to violated rights and compensation for harm caused. At the same time, there are no legal norms in the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation regulating the consequences taking place after a decision is made to terminate administrative and legal prosecution on rehabilitating grounds and to restore an innocent citizen's violated rights. According to the author, the currently available civil law mechanisms for compensation for harm are not able to fully ensure compliance with the legal consequences of rehabilitation in case of unlawful administrative prosecution. Based on the analysis of practical proposals put forward by scientists, the necessity is justified and ways of implementing legal regulation of administrative and legal rehabilitation using public legal mechanisms are proposed. The main conclusions of the study are that the right guaranteed by Article 53 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation to everyone to compensation by the state for harm caused by illegal actions (or inaction) of public authorities or their officials should be reflected in sectoral (administrative) legislation. For the development of the rehabilitation, it is important to use the experience of countries that recognize in national administrative legislation the right to rehabilitation and compensation for harm caused to an individual or legal entity by illegal actions of the authorities of jurisdiction. Such experience is important for the development of the institute of rehabilitation in Russian administrative legislation. The introduction of the rehabilitation into Russian administrative legislation will not only ensure the rights guaranteed by the Constitution of the Russian Federation, but also improve the quality of the administrative process (in terms of proceedings on administrative offenses).

Keywords: administrative legislation, state responsibility, public relations, restoration of violated rights, compensation for moral damage, procedural mechanisms for rehabilitation, compensation for harm, administrative responsibility, rehabilitation, observance of human rights