Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

National Security
Reference:

Przhilenskiy V.I. The logic of extremism: explanation vs. understanding

Abstract: The subject of this research is the specificity of extremist thinking, structure and contents of targeting of the extremist oriented individuals. The article examines extremism as a special type of attitude of an individual towards the processes and phenomena taking place in the surrounding world, in other words, in social, cultural, and ethno-confessional environment. The author explores the two types of main sources of the modern extremism (archaic and modern), by the reaction upon which the emotional and value-hued antagonism of the events encouraging individuals to search the way out from the situation in hand, are being determined. The author substantiates the thesis on the insufficient efficiency of classical means and methods of the analysis of specificity of the extremist thinking, such as historical materialism, positivism, and structural functionalism. The article presents two types of social techniques, with the help of which the modern world finds a “solution” of the problem of an individual and a group captured by the extremist attitudes. The author proves that there is a connection of these techniques with the spatial-temporal localization of values that unites the historical-geographical, ethno-confessional and sociocultural determinants of self-identification. The threats of the external interference into this process, as well as the need for the effective countermeasures against its manipulative technologization, are being demonstrated.


Keywords:

manipulation, identity, universal, unique, method, social tecniques, extremist thinking, modern, archaic, philosophical hermeneutics


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Zhigal'tsova T.V. Podkhody k ponyatiyam "modern" i "postmodern" v teorii kul'tury // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2011. ¹ 11. C. 102-113.
2. Shebanova M.A. Kosmopoliticheskaya identichnost' kak odna iz form transnatsional'nykh identichnostey // Politika i Obshchestvo. 2013. ¹ 8. C. 1039-1051. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.8.8781.
3. Khrenov N.A. Modernizatsionnye protsessy na rubezhe XX–XXI vekov i sud'ba traditsionnykh tsennostey // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. 2013. ¹ 5. C. 544-555. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2013.5.9570.
4. Fedotova N.N. Rol' identichnosti dlya razvitiya ekonomiki i modernizatsii // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2012. ¹ 10. C. 76-86.
5. Aly A. Countering violent extremism: social harmony, community resilience and the potential counter-narrative in the Australian context // Counter-Radicalisation: Critical Perspectives. L.,NY.: Routledge, 2015. P. 71-88.
6. Gofman A.B. V poiskakh utrachennoy identichnosti: traditsii, traditsionalizm i natsional'naya identichnost' // Voprosy sotsial'noy teorii. 2010. T. IV. S. 241-254.
7. Gusev D.G. Upravlyaemyy khaos // Sotsiologiya upravleniya. Teoretiko-prikladnoy tolkovyy slovar' / Otv. red. A.V. Tikhonov. M.: Izdatel'stvo URSS, 2014. S. 282-283.
8. Fedotova V.G. Khoroshee obshchestvo. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2004. 544 s.
9. Bodriyyar Zh. Gorod i nenavist' // Logos. 1997. ¹ 9. S. 107-116.
10. Przhilenskiy V.I. Upravlenie arkhaizatsiey: mezhdu etikoy, teleologiey i tekhnologiey // Filosofskie nauki. 2012. ¹ 5. S. 9-19.
11. Puankare A. O nauke. M.: Nauka, 1990. 736 s.
12. Gabriel Blouin Genest Le (dé)goût d’un printemps : la construction sociale de la violence et de l’extrémisme politique lors du conflit étudiant québécois // Cultures & Conflits. 87 (Automne 2012) Guerres et reconnaissance. R. 160-166.
13. Yakh'yaev M.Ya. Istoki i prichiny sushchestvovaniya ekstremizma kak negativnogo sotsial'nogo yavleniya / http://www.ekstremizm.ru/biblioteka/item/187-istoki-i-prichiny-ekstremizma
14. Rozin V.M. Pravdopodobnye konspirologicheskie teorii (diskursivnyy analiz) // Politika i Obshchestvo. 2016. ¹ 3. C. 301-310. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2016.3.18273.